That intro was great! After about 8 fake intros I was thinking, “Okay, this one has to be the actual one”. The Prof says it’s time to open Epilogue boosters and I lost it 😂
Prof. I have chosen both, to buy and not to buy products because of your reviews. However, just because I chose not to buy a product because of your review does not mean I would have bought it, it just means you saved me the time of looking more into the product myself before choosing not to buy it.
I feel the same! It also saves the waste of having to return something when it doesn't work -- that's fuel and packaging and work hours spent on correcting my mistake, due to lack of information, and sometimes the products don't even get resold to someone who might want them due to distributor policies. An honest review is a high-quality tool for decision making, and having an expert eye means I can spend that time and money in a more informed way.
Bout time the people still buying this junk are just as much the problem as Hasbro/Wizards. They ruined the game and people kept giving them money. Things don't change because most people don't care about anything.
I think the reality is a lot of the more casual MTG players with lower budgets look to you guys to give closer inspections on products before we spend our money and then feel bad if the products end up being trash. You also give positive reassurances on products that we like and make us feel a little more justified in our purchases. Should we have this mindset? Maybe not, but it is the reality. You guys know far more about the inner workings of the game than most. So, as one of the more casual people, thank you for being critics (both positive and negative).
Honestly, I think there's nothing wrong with relying on expert opinions. Even other experts can't be experts on everything -- that's why astrophysicist and surgeon are different careers, to make a silly example. I really value these MtG specialist perspectives, because there are some aspects of my hobbies I'm going to want to build expertise in, and some aspects I just don't really care to. Time is precious and people should be encouraged to spend it in the way that's most fulfilling -- as long as people are having fun, who cares? That's why having a community is so important, in a purely efficiency-oriented intellectual-economies-of-scale sort of way.
"Don't ask questions. Just consume product and get excited for new product." Is the motto of those unable to accept criticism of their product. Without any sort of criticism, you don't know if you've made any missteps or errors. Listening to the echo chamber brings no room for improvement or consistency in quality.
@@BobardeZanzibar So let me get this straight... If you ask me, "What is 2+2=?" And I keep giving you the wrong answer, how many times would you correct me before telling me the answer? One time? Five times? Eight-hundred times? Or would you even correct me at all to avoid seeming to be too critical?
@@tapitandsacitall tea comes from one plant but Earl Grey isn't just a type of tea, it's a blend, one of the most prominent parts of which is bergamot, which comes from a type of orange, making earl grey taste citrusy and floral, it's also normally served without milk
I actually did buy the Hobbits precon Commander deck based on your enthusiastic recommendation. I really appreciate how you try to keep your bias against Universes Beyond out of your reviews and grade the products on their own merits. And thanks for leading me to PleasantKenobi’s channel, I’ve been enjoying his content too. I think tough but fair is a good description of you both, and it’s why I feel like I can trust your word. I don’t always agree, but life would be rather boring if everyone agreed on everything. Cheers!
What often gets lost in a conversation about criticism, is that we tend to spend the most time criticizing the things we love the most. Any criticism that’s well laid out and thoughtful should be looked at as positive in my humble opinion. Remember folks, someone disagreeing with you or having a different opinion is not inherently a bad thing. It’s a good thing. Growth comes from discourse, change, discussion and criticism. Not blind obedience. Always challenge the things you love the most.
Yeah. When something lacks criticism it's not necessarily because its good its just because people stop. Caring. Insert examples of dead card games here
Brian’s point about wanting to watch uplifting content because you’re depressed about the state of things in the world is so relatable to me. There’s only so much true crime content that I can take before I just want to watch a goofy slice of life anime or listen to someone talk about how much they like Baldur’s Gate and stuff like that. While negative criticism can drive passion, sometimes I just need something happy
I want to say that Vince's videos of gameplay on Arena have really warmed my perception of Alchemy cards. I always thought they were kinda neat but it sucks that they were digitally exclusive, but now I don't have as much of a feels bad around them and can enjoy them for what they are- cards like Jarsyl and Settle the Wilds are some of my favorite cards I've played with this year and it's thanks in large part to Vince's gameplay of Jarsyl!
I'm really glad I managed to help inform and expand your view of the game in a way that helped you enjoy it more. Genuinely glad to hear it, thank you.
Sometimes youtube doesn't show me your videos even though I'm subbed to both of you. I subbed to PK because of his Minotaur tribal gameplay, and I have been loving the Gladiator content (I also love Shuffle Up & Play). I don't like that you have to, but I have watched many videos from Prof *because* he made a community post saying he posted a video. I value both of your opinions regardless of if they're positive or negative, but I understand that I am just one person. Thanks to both of you for all the work you do.
I love flesh and blood but I hate that they tear down anyone who criticizes anything they do. We're left with just praise and it's not how the game is discussed at the game stores there's a lot of good and there's a lot of bad. The one channel I know of that used to discuss it in a fair manner had their store banned by flesh and blood for tournaments.
Really? Sorry to hear that! From Sweden myself, and F&B hasn't really gotten off the ground here so not at all up to date, but always sad when communities are treated like that.
@@KerrxLaeda it was a TH-camr he made a comment how they overprinted monarch and took a guess the box numbers and it turned out he was pretty close to correct and when channel fireball unloaded nearly 50% of all first edition monarch boxes after the price had stabilized crashing it.
@@KerrxLaeda I don't think that them giving 50% of their entire stock to channel fireball was meant to be vindictive I just think from the pre-orders came and the box the shot up to $500 that channel fireball wanted to cash out. Apparently LSS had been paying them in products to run their tournaments in the United States. It was vindictive for them to ban his store he was one of the first couple stories that actually took up flesh and blood and he didn't even play at his own store or let alone go there so his customers were punished.
“The Command Zone” “Spell Slingers” and “You” are the reason I hint back into magic again. And I’m going to keep playing because of you and your videos. Thank you both for your service to the MTG community.
On a product-by-product basis, I don't think you've persuaded/dissuaded me from buying anything, but you've definitely influenced my approach to determining what to dedicate my money towards. I think I've purchased fewer boosterboxes, opting for singles instead, specifically due to points you've made in the past. And I thank you for it :)
It's funny and sad, because once I saw a podcast that used to be very, very renowned... Talk about how Product Fatigue is a "Lie", Magic 30 not being "That Bad" and "Maybe not every product is for you"... When they got sponsored by Wizards. It was a sad moment.
As an inhabitant of Barcemenapolis, I can confirm that our Pro Tour showcased the new Double Feature-Aftermath cards which, as demanded by tradition, were respectfully laid to rest in a local landfill.
I had the most growth working with my toughest professors 👨🏫 they were supportive but also knew me well and knew what I was capable of and thus pushed me to be better. I feel like you’re that professor of magic. (Or to Wotc) Your content is a supportive, standard holder, cheerleader, growth cultivator, educator, making people aware of other voices kind of professor.
Tolarian has a podcast?! Okay day made. I’m getting back into magic because of this amazing channel and it’s fair and balanced commentary. Keep up the good work!
I think content creators who want to focus on positivity should be allowed to do that. But when there are major, significant things happening in the community that they won’t even mention in passing because they’re “negative”, it’s really just advertising, and it feels very alienating. As much as I don’t want to endlessly hear angry people complaining about everything in videos and podcasts, I do want to have some sense of how people actually feel, and to know they care even a little bit about something like skyrocketing product prices, or Wizards siccing the Pinkertons on a small TH-camr. A refusal to even acknowledge the basic fact of these problems’ existence is discrediting, imo.
I can agree, but also don't envy the creators' position in how to convey that. A lot of various bad/dumb things happen around the game, be it Pinkertons or Double Feature or Magic 30 or whatever, that if you make a video on each one as it happens for relevancy's sake you could potentially end up with your solid chunk of your content being (rightfully) negative content. And you can't exactly make a yearly roundup because who cares about how bad Double Feature was when it's long gone. So while I agree such a creator should feel comfortable breaking from their style to address serious issues with the game, it's not exactly easy to do while maintaining their intended content feel.
Personally, I'm just so bored by all of it. For example, I skip quite a few Pleasant Kenobi videos nowadays when I see that they're about a scandal that I've already heard enough about. which is a shame because I often do enjoy hearing his perspective, but it's just too draining to hear about the same topic for the tenth time. I get why people want that kind of thing though. I think it might be a personality/taste thing. I'm pretty quick to compartmentalise the shitty things that a franchise or company does and move on from them, which has its upsides and downsides. Others may be less willing to separate the wheat from the chaff, which has its own positives and negatives. Ultimately, all of this should be in the hands of the creators themselves. All we can do is choose to follow the creators that we feel matches our preferences the closest.
@@Hemlocker Yeah, and I guess I should offer the specification that I'm talking about content creators who purport to cover Magic news in some capacity, even if it's not all they do. If you're someone who really just does deck-techs or lore analysis or whatever, then I get that it would be jarring to suddenly switch to some video about the latest evils of WOTC. But you know, the Pinkertons thing was big enough that not talking about when you talk about other Magic news is a very clear and deliberate choice, and as much as it's easy to get tired of hearing about it, I think in some ways it didn't get enough coverage, in that even though it may have seemed like all anyone was talking about for a couple weeks, it wasn't enough to elicit any kind of response from WOTC. It's still upsetting to me that the response was for a few specific people to act mad about it for a couple weeks and then go on talking about the new products like it was all normal. Maybe I'm getting into a separate issue at this point but I think there's certain stuff that just kind of NEEDS to matter to people who produce content about these subjects, and to brush it off under the banner of "staying positive" is very worth criticizing to me.
@@caulifloodle Fair enough. Personally I'd still say that what "needs" to be talked about should generally still be up to the creators themselves, but I can see why certain issues might feel so severe that they cross that boundary. The Pinkertons scandal might have been an example.
Well done to Vince for challenging Prof's view at 34:50 . I think fair criticism is important, be it either positive or negative but you can't on the one hand say that you have to create 'negative' thumbnails for the algorithm so that you get more viewers and then on the other hand say a negative review wouldn't have some sort of effect on sales. I know that if I see a reputable channel like this say a product isn't worth it or an alternative is better then I will not buy said product. It's a really interesting topic. Thank you both for the podcast!
You guys wondering if you were a part of someone getting into something new, Pleasant Kenobi you got me into both Marvel Snap and way into Warhammer Lore (along with other channels with their deep dives on the insane amount of Warhammer lore there is). And Prof you convinced me to make not one but two pauper commander decks, and also my own version of Jon Irenicus after your season finale episode, which was one of if not the best games of recorded commander content I have ever watched. And you also got my nostalgia firing for Yu-Gi-Oh (my first TCG) with your videos with Team APS and I’ve been playing a little bit of Master Duel lately.
I think its safe to say that your videos do cause people to not buy certain products but on the other hand your videos got me back into magic. WOTC has gotten more money out of me because of you than your videos could take away. Thank you both for all the positivity you bring to the community.
I pre-ordered the Tyranid 40k deck, and getting the promo from the LGS made it feel really special. Those promo cards do make a difference in all their forms.
I’ve loved this conversation The intro was hilarious, that you then followed into a super thoughtful conversation on life and meaning Love you guys and yes you’re both a part of my love of Magic
I didn’t even look at the thumbnail, I saw pleasant Kenobi and bryan’s face in my peripheral vision and went, “DIES TO REMOVAL” thank you for making my morning excellent
Wizards messed up since: Balance is less important than power creep, They took over every fun format to turn it into their gold donkey, They started neglecting the physical game for easier online Cashgrab, They bought the opinion and voice of every magic influencer, They started printing less creative more whacky cards to cash bait casuals, They printed important cards for competitive play at higher rarities for more set sales, They printed more and more "premium products" aka secret lair, mythic editions etc. To grab money inflating the value of foil or high rarity cards by having 10 different "high rarity versions", They ruined competetive play by custom designing the format with powercrept "must play" cards, They let magic die for low quality low identity and low creativity design on cards, sets and basically everything portrayed to the outside. Also the old Employee working conditions issue. Basically since war of the spark or some time around that
ngl, my interest in magic has plummeted to near zero in the last year. it used to be my main hobby, now i pretty much exclusively play pokemon tcg and warhammer. it is what it is i guess.
British person here: Earl Grey and Breakfast Tea are TOTALLY different! Both are black teas but the main difference, which is the unique feature of Earl Grey, is that Earl Grey has bergamot for an added orangey, citrus hint.
You get a thumbs up for that skit. It just kept getting better and I busted out laughing 3 different times. Love the new play on the "has a TH-cam Channel" bit. Also, I do prefer an Earl Grey over an Eng Breakfast and they are 100% different flavors.
The problem is regardless of what critics say Wizards can basically do whatever they want with Magic because people still throw tons of money at it anyways. The MTG community needs to come together and force change like the DnD community did.
I know it is a few days late for this video, but (for your personal data research) you and my friend Zack are the two main reasons I got into and have been playing Magic for the last 14 months. Thanks, Prof!
10:00 You mean talking in a wrestling announcers voice complaining about every single thing and calling for the doom of magic is not good criticism ? Iam historically disappointed
Leather daddy Hasbro is the only product I need for 2023. - "Oh daddy, give me those curled foils!" - (gruff voice) "you've been a bad customer.." - "So bad, Daddy Hasbro, I'll buy all the worthless collector boosters you want!" - "AND SECRET LAIRS!" - "Yessss Daddyyyyy!"
It's so fascinating that in their individual channels, I feel like Kenobi is waaaaaay more negative. But in these episodes it is the exact opposite xD cool to hear them discuss that!
A buddy of mine is just getting into magic. We had a fantastic game of 6 player edh, he borrowed my izzet dragon tribal deck and ended up winning (and we definitely didn’t hand him that win either.) he had a great time. When he expressed interest in learning how to play he opted to look up tutorial videos online. He likely came across some of your videos. My fear is if he continues to research to decide which commander he wants to build, he is going to stumble upon the critique videos, which tells the algorithm that he needs more negative energy. Then next thing you know he’s going to see nothing but the magic historian or other hyper negative channels and he starts wondering what the problem with this game is. We just want a friend to hang out with, and channels like that are going to prevent this, potentially. I think you’re absolutely right, fair criticism makes a lot of sense. Blatant hate is a waste of time
Thing about all those “positive” centric spaces and people who don’t wanna get bogged down in the negative aspects of the game is that sure, other people can respect that and move on to other types of content that speaks to them. They’re still not going to be safe when wotc eventually ruins the game in a way where even the most positive and open minded of mtg players say it’s enough and apathy truly sets in from them too. The enemy is not and has never been the player base, the enemy is wizard of the coast and their masters at Hasbro. Always has been, always will. Yelling amongst ourself does nothing but let them win.
I am new to the channel and TCG. What I enjoy about the channel's perspective is the overall love for the genre and the sincerity of the views. I have never thought that the Prof was trying to be negative for views.
I'm just getting back to Magic after about 15 years away from game after quitting in High School. Your videos give great information and advice for me to utilize in my choices as a complete plebiscite. I mentioned to a long time player I've been in a commander pod with for a couple months now that I was getting the LOTR starter decks so I could get the exclusives rates and mythics that come in them, and he had no idea that was a thing. Magic is a completely baffling and confusing array of products to sift through as a born again player, and I thank you for your help in doing so. This is an amazing channel.
I genuinely clicked to hear two of my favorite MTG creators have a thoughtful discussion about the roll of critics in an engagement driven space. Commenting for the algorithm.
56:25 Regarding "the health of magic being correlated in part to the health of its creators," it's important to address the issue of reversing causality and the implicit association of the community's well-being with the "big names." While MTG creators have indeed become more prominent than ever before in terms of views and financial success, it is crucial to note that the overall health and quality of the game have declined. This contradicts the notion that increased volume in terms of players or profit necessarily leads to an improved product or experience. Furthermore, we should not overlook the significant impact of the changes made by Wizards of the Coast to organized play, which essentially led to the demise of the "cottage industry" of MTG content and grassroots event series. The discontinuation of these elements not only resulted in thousands of job losses amongst the professional content community but also dissipated the financial support that once sustained that aspect of the game. It's disheartening to witness the absence of meaningful SCG or CFB premium articles, and the decline of grassroots events that used to occur at least once a month in various regions worldwide. The focus on collecting rather than playing the game, which WotC seems to prioritize, further exacerbates the issue. The current emphasis on a social fan format, which the game was not originally designed or balanced for, has diminished the desire for players to engage with content that enhance their gameplay. Moreover, the continuous need for card bans in the standard format makes it unappealing to invest $500 USD in a deck that could become obsolete due to these frequent bans. In the modern format, which has gradually veered towards a homogenized "5 color good stuff" approach, the cards themselves have become increasingly powerful, often possessing game-winning abilities, convoluted paragraphs of text and, conditionally free casting costs. TL;DR: The health of the Magic: The Gathering community is not solely determined by the success of one section of its popular creators. Despite portions of the game reciving increased prominence, the game's overall quality has declined. The changes made by Wizards of the Coast, including the effective discontinuation of organized play, have negatively affected the MTG content industry and grassroots events. The focus on collecting rather than playing, along with constant card bans, format imbalances and, a never ending stream of product releases has dampened enthusiasm among players.
Great point at the end. Even the whiniest, most pedantic critics mean that people still care about what you're putting out. Outrage is preferable to apathy.
I think its important to remember as a consumer, WotK is not there to be my friend, they aren't doing me any favors. They only want the contents of my wallet. Thats it. They will use every metric to get as much out of every customer as possible. When it comes to critics, When i see a critic who WotK is afraid to interact with, because THEY KNOW they are offering a weak/greedy product. The more I trust the critic. I can honestly say I trust Prof. more than any other outlet. Your growth proves you're a positive influence on the community, and helping to protect us from predictory marketing, Just like the late Total Biscuit (rip). Love ya Prof.
MTG isn't really my go-to game but I have enjoyed it, but this video is a great evaluation of the toxic content that is created against a lot of popular IPs. Anger mining, negative media. Great topics that are relevant accross many genres.
As someone who plays lots of different kinds of games, mtg really does have a great community behind it. Theres been plenty of games where i cant find hard data and it has ultimately ruined my experience because i cant figure out how something works and the only thing online is a forum post from 8 years ago that says "just do it right and itll work". Meanwhile, mtg has people going in depth for eveey aspect: deck building, why a curve is important, how to increase consistency, why some cards are better even though they read almost the exact same, IN DEPTH RULINGS with a ton of technical talk, product reviews, your deckbox and sleeve reviews (gave me tons of confidence in buying stuff so i didnt feel guilty like i just wasted my money), etc.
my favorite tea is the mysterious concoction my shaman gave me under that waterfall out behind the Dennys. It left me stranded in the astral realm for a month and a half. I woke up in the softest bed I've ever slept in, in a hotel in Algeria.
I’d watch a full-length movie of PK going about his day while the Prof appears out of random places and crannies and screams “PACK! OPEN IT!” Before letting loose with a handful of D-tier sealed packs.
Listening to this has reminded me of a Twitter post I saw recently, asking for your hot take about magic, and the one that really popped off was that wotc ruined edh by making all of these commander specific products over the years, and how the power levels of edh has just exploded to almost yugioh levels because of it
Prof, Vince is totally right on the tea thing. I have no idea how Earl Grey became the standard tea here in the states when it's the worst tasting option possible. Not unlike how the Red Delicious apple somehow became the standard apple. My favorite teas would be orange pekoe, darjeeling, or rooibos varieties
For me, the appeal of a critical video is not the negativity. But rather the fact that it forces analysis. I could make a positive video about any Magic product by picking 5 random cards, reading what they do, and imagining possible uses. That says nothing about the product because I could do it for everything. People who always complain are a little better not because you should want that energy in your life, but because at least they're offering some kind of comparison. Nevertheless, those people aren't much improvement because it too is something they can always do. Reality never matches imagination. The best creators are, as you say, fair critics. But even among them I'm more likely to watch a critical video simply because it takes more effort to say what's wrong than to simply describe something and declare it "good enough."
Top teas for me: Jasmine (don't steep for too long or too hot, scalding ruins it, imo) Moroccan mint Darjeeling Genmaicha (and popped rice tea, in general)
I keep playing magic because of people like you two. You helped me feel like getting back into the game after over a decade would be a reasonable goal. Been playing consistently for years now. Thanks. Jasmine, but Earl Grey over English breakfast.
This is kinda random, but am the only one who watches the professor just move his toes around while I listen? It's really nice to just feel like he's not trying to impress, just be himself and talk about something with us like friends.
As creators/influencers you have a voice. This will resonate with your audience both positively and negatively. This does have an effect on product purchases for your viewers but does that affect the overall product sales, unlikely.
Speaking of channels that just want to talk about magic for the sake of talking about magic, I highly recommend Chorocojo. Probably the chillest thing in magic youtube. Basically randomly generates a card and finds something neat to say about it for a minute or 2. Like bite sized Rhystic Studies but less academic.
So, the thumbnail caught my eye, but the title and the publisher is what made me watch. But yes, a lot of people just want to be angry. Also, I will say that as a former primarily Yugioh player, Yugioh has a very in depth creatorsphere. I'm not sure any one Yugituber is as popular as Tolarian Community College, but so many Yugitubers are incredibly popular within the Yugioh playerbase. I would be surprised if other popular TCGs (Pokemon specifically) didn't have creatorspheres as large as MTG and Yugioh.
Heres some fuel to the whole critic arguement - I ignored all criticism and gameplay videos, ignored all positive and negatives when it came to MoM aftermath. I just saw the cool card I liked. I bought a booster box, cracked it, and immediately regretted it. Alternatively, I did watch basically only criticisms on and bought Innistrad Midnight Hunt and loved it! People need criticism but they also need to synthesize the information to their needs. You don't like negativity? Well be prepared to get let down when you buy something you didn't get info on.
Fair criticism is a big reason why I come to this channel. Not only is it NOT bad for the game in my experience, but it allows me to enjoy the game more. If the only voices I heard were relentlessly positive about things that I feel are plainly terrible, I'd probably look around and decide I don't want to be a part of this. The game design is impeccable as always, but the price of game pieces is so high that Wizards/Hasbro should be overjoyed that anyone says even remotely positive things about the product, while they stuff their pockets with the paychecks of addicts
Wizards of the Coast should be extremely ashamed of the decisions they've been making, but they're not, because they're too busy murdering puppies with butter knives, which. based on their decisions, is definitely a thing they do regularly and is not even close to the most horrible thing they do. We can't possibly think of what those things are because we have souls. Wizard's bad.
I actually think both Prof and Kenobi are underestimating the influence of algorithms on content creation/interaction. Yes, it's a more symbiotic relationship than merely "the algorithm says do this", however it is still a relationship where one party (the algorithm) is setting the parameters of that relationship. Similar to how a person's thoughts can be largely dictated by the language and ideas they are immersed within, a person's relationship with media is largely dictated by the method of its delivery. "The medium is the message" is the adage that applies. For example, Twitter has (had?) a strict character limit, which severely limits and shapes what a "conversation" on that platform is, and people quickly adapted to that environment such that the messages they share thrive within the set parameters (short, witty, snarky one-upsmanship). With algorithmic content delivery, algorithms have set a sort of "content character limit" of what is and is not promoted, and despite how an audience chooses to engage with that, they are beholden to the dynamic that emerges in such a system: provocative, binary extremes vying for attention. Try to "tell" the algorithm to stop functioning that way only by engaging the content it suggests, and see what happens. Algorithms don't necessarily foster negativity, but they do push people towards content bubbles which further reinforce algorithmic delivery, because that is the "best" way for them to function. And it so happens that extreme negativity is very profitable; both for attracting people's attention, and for eliciting a susceptible marketing response.
Vince has a TH-cam channel? He does! Watch his new gameplay series here: th-cam.com/video/UXzREm20dqs/w-d-xo.html
My favorite tea is lapsang souchong! I love the smoky, bacony taste it has! 🍃🐖🌋
"Wizards of the Coast has a TH-cam channel?!" was a wonderful joke
How tf you not taste the difference between british breakfast and earl grey? And I'm American.
Love me some dies to removal, British Breakfast Tea tastes COMPLETELY different to Earl Gray. Blended tea's are the best tea's.
If it wasnt people like you this wretched card game would die quicker
So admirable of Prof to distract from Vince’s bad American accent by immediately unleashing a British accent that is so much worse.
THREE Dies to Removal episodes in one year? Prof and Kenobi putting in work.
The output is truly prolific
I misheard Vince saying 'this term' at the start and thought that yeah, two a year sounds about right
Hasbro is there daddy now and has high standards
This is the content I came for! I also want more. MORE! MAAAAWWWRRRR!
Thank you Prof and PleasantKenobi!
And we're only halfway through the year! This is an incredible quantity!
That intro was great! After about 8 fake intros I was thinking, “Okay, this one has to be the actual one”. The Prof says it’s time to open Epilogue boosters and I lost it 😂
Rule of three? Never heard of it. Lol.
Legit made me laugh out loud, they were all fanstic
Rule of 3*3
“You wouldn’t proxy a car” got me 😂
You wouldn't download a card
Oh, but I WOULD proxy a Vehicle!
I literally would if I could lol
I would proxy a car so fast, no shred of doubt about it
@@Aigis31for greasefang rigth?
Prof. I have chosen both, to buy and not to buy products because of your reviews. However, just because I chose not to buy a product because of your review does not mean I would have bought it, it just means you saved me the time of looking more into the product myself before choosing not to buy it.
I feel the same! It also saves the waste of having to return something when it doesn't work -- that's fuel and packaging and work hours spent on correcting my mistake, due to lack of information, and sometimes the products don't even get resold to someone who might want them due to distributor policies. An honest review is a high-quality tool for decision making, and having an expert eye means I can spend that time and money in a more informed way.
The Prof sadly saying "Hasbro is both of our daddy now" awakened something 😂
New kink unlocked.
DONT PUT THAT EVIL INTO THE WORLD
Bout time the people still buying this junk are just as much the problem as Hasbro/Wizards. They ruined the game and people kept giving them money. Things don't change because most people don't care about anything.
I think the reality is a lot of the more casual MTG players with lower budgets look to you guys to give closer inspections on products before we spend our money and then feel bad if the products end up being trash. You also give positive reassurances on products that we like and make us feel a little more justified in our purchases. Should we have this mindset? Maybe not, but it is the reality. You guys know far more about the inner workings of the game than most. So, as one of the more casual people, thank you for being critics (both positive and negative).
Honestly, I think there's nothing wrong with relying on expert opinions. Even other experts can't be experts on everything -- that's why astrophysicist and surgeon are different careers, to make a silly example. I really value these MtG specialist perspectives, because there are some aspects of my hobbies I'm going to want to build expertise in, and some aspects I just don't really care to. Time is precious and people should be encouraged to spend it in the way that's most fulfilling -- as long as people are having fun, who cares? That's why having a community is so important, in a purely efficiency-oriented intellectual-economies-of-scale sort of way.
I don't normally laugh out loud at stuff, but when Kenobi shouts "You wouldn't proxy a car!" genuinely made me laugh out loud.
"Don't ask questions. Just consume product and get excited for new product."
Is the motto of those unable to accept criticism of their product. Without any sort of criticism, you don't know if you've made any missteps or errors. Listening to the echo chamber brings no room for improvement or consistency in quality.
Hasbro does not care😂
@@sebastian55112 Oh, it's painfully obvious they don't give a shit. It was obvious from day one.
But it does bring-in truckloads of money lol
It's just when people do nothing but complain which makes you wonder why you even want to play this "terrible" game.
@@BobardeZanzibar So let me get this straight... If you ask me, "What is 2+2=?" And I keep giving you the wrong answer, how many times would you correct me before telling me the answer? One time? Five times? Eight-hundred times? Or would you even correct me at all to avoid seeming to be too critical?
Prof... Vince was on point; earl grey and English breakfast teas are like Star Wars and Star Trek, in a totally different universe.
Wait... are you saying Chewbaca and Riker aren't the same person?
I'd definitely watch Chewie present Beyond Belief:Fact or Fiction 😂
All tea comes from one plant, Camellia sinensis- google lol
Green Tea > Earl Grey imo
@@tapitandsacitall tea comes from one plant but Earl Grey isn't just a type of tea, it's a blend, one of the most prominent parts of which is bergamot, which comes from a type of orange, making earl grey taste citrusy and floral, it's also normally served without milk
I actually did buy the Hobbits precon Commander deck based on your enthusiastic recommendation. I really appreciate how you try to keep your bias against Universes Beyond out of your reviews and grade the products on their own merits. And thanks for leading me to PleasantKenobi’s channel, I’ve been enjoying his content too. I think tough but fair is a good description of you both, and it’s why I feel like I can trust your word. I don’t always agree, but life would be rather boring if everyone agreed on everything. Cheers!
Wait Kenobi has a TH-cam channel?!
What often gets lost in a conversation about criticism, is that we tend to spend the most time criticizing the things we love the most. Any criticism that’s well laid out and thoughtful should be looked at as positive in my humble opinion.
Remember folks, someone disagreeing with you or having a different opinion is not inherently a bad thing. It’s a good thing. Growth comes from discourse, change, discussion and criticism. Not blind obedience.
Always challenge the things you love the most.
Yeah. When something lacks criticism it's not necessarily because its good its just because people stop. Caring. Insert examples of dead card games here
Brian’s point about wanting to watch uplifting content because you’re depressed about the state of things in the world is so relatable to me. There’s only so much true crime content that I can take before I just want to watch a goofy slice of life anime or listen to someone talk about how much they like Baldur’s Gate and stuff like that. While negative criticism can drive passion, sometimes I just need something happy
I love prof throwing packs at vince screaming, "Open it!" 🤣🤣🤣
I want to say that Vince's videos of gameplay on Arena have really warmed my perception of Alchemy cards. I always thought they were kinda neat but it sucks that they were digitally exclusive, but now I don't have as much of a feels bad around them and can enjoy them for what they are- cards like Jarsyl and Settle the Wilds are some of my favorite cards I've played with this year and it's thanks in large part to Vince's gameplay of Jarsyl!
I'm really glad I managed to help inform and expand your view of the game in a way that helped you enjoy it more. Genuinely glad to hear it, thank you.
@@PleasantKenobi The only digitally unique thing I find unforgivable is Specialize, but otherwise they're mostly good or ok
Alchemy is the devil.
Sometimes youtube doesn't show me your videos even though I'm subbed to both of you. I subbed to PK because of his Minotaur tribal gameplay, and I have been loving the Gladiator content (I also love Shuffle Up & Play). I don't like that you have to, but I have watched many videos from Prof *because* he made a community post saying he posted a video. I value both of your opinions regardless of if they're positive or negative, but I understand that I am just one person. Thanks to both of you for all the work you do.
I love flesh and blood but I hate that they tear down anyone who criticizes anything they do. We're left with just praise and it's not how the game is discussed at the game stores there's a lot of good and there's a lot of bad. The one channel I know of that used to discuss it in a fair manner had their store banned by flesh and blood for tournaments.
Really? Sorry to hear that!
From Sweden myself, and F&B hasn't really gotten off the ground here so not at all up to date, but always sad when communities are treated like that.
@@KerrxLaeda it was a TH-camr he made a comment how they overprinted monarch and took a guess the box numbers and it turned out he was pretty close to correct and when channel fireball unloaded nearly 50% of all first edition monarch boxes after the price had stabilized crashing it.
@@Genocide4all And they banned them for that?
Feels both petty and vindictive, especially if they didn't get the information in an underhanded way
@@KerrxLaeda I don't think that them giving 50% of their entire stock to channel fireball was meant to be vindictive I just think from the pre-orders came and the box the shot up to $500 that channel fireball wanted to cash out. Apparently LSS had been paying them in products to run their tournaments in the United States. It was vindictive for them to ban his store he was one of the first couple stories that actually took up flesh and blood and he didn't even play at his own store or let alone go there so his customers were punished.
@@Genocide4allthere is such a thing as "overprinting"?
In this episode of DtR, we learn The Prof can't distinguish flavors very well.
Thank you for shouting out to Film Joy Prof, Movie with Mikey is always such a great moment!
“The Command Zone” “Spell Slingers” and “You” are the reason I hint back into magic again. And I’m going to keep playing because of you and your videos. Thank you both for your service to the MTG community.
On a product-by-product basis, I don't think you've persuaded/dissuaded me from buying anything, but you've definitely influenced my approach to determining what to dedicate my money towards. I think I've purchased fewer boosterboxes, opting for singles instead, specifically due to points you've made in the past. And I thank you for it :)
No, i don’t think that Critics are bad for Magic
The most unrealistic part of the opening skit is that there were that many episodes of Dies to Removal in 6 months
It's funny and sad, because once I saw a podcast that used to be very, very renowned... Talk about how Product Fatigue is a "Lie", Magic 30 not being "That Bad" and "Maybe not every product is for you"... When they got sponsored by Wizards. It was a sad moment.
I don't consume a lot of mtg content who was this?
That intro skit was amazing and the whole podcast was great
As an inhabitant of Barcemenapolis, I can confirm that our Pro Tour showcased the new Double Feature-Aftermath cards which, as demanded by tradition, were respectfully laid to rest in a local landfill.
I had the most growth working with my toughest professors 👨🏫 they were supportive but also knew me well and knew what I was capable of and thus pushed me to be better. I feel like you’re that professor of magic. (Or to Wotc) Your content is a supportive, standard holder, cheerleader, growth cultivator, educator, making people aware of other voices kind of professor.
Tolarian has a podcast?! Okay day made.
I’m getting back into magic because of this amazing channel and it’s fair and balanced commentary. Keep up the good work!
I think content creators who want to focus on positivity should be allowed to do that. But when there are major, significant things happening in the community that they won’t even mention in passing because they’re “negative”, it’s really just advertising, and it feels very alienating. As much as I don’t want to endlessly hear angry people complaining about everything in videos and podcasts, I do want to have some sense of how people actually feel, and to know they care even a little bit about something like skyrocketing product prices, or Wizards siccing the Pinkertons on a small TH-camr. A refusal to even acknowledge the basic fact of these problems’ existence is discrediting, imo.
I can agree, but also don't envy the creators' position in how to convey that. A lot of various bad/dumb things happen around the game, be it Pinkertons or Double Feature or Magic 30 or whatever, that if you make a video on each one as it happens for relevancy's sake you could potentially end up with your solid chunk of your content being (rightfully) negative content. And you can't exactly make a yearly roundup because who cares about how bad Double Feature was when it's long gone. So while I agree such a creator should feel comfortable breaking from their style to address serious issues with the game, it's not exactly easy to do while maintaining their intended content feel.
Personally, I'm just so bored by all of it. For example, I skip quite a few Pleasant Kenobi videos nowadays when I see that they're about a scandal that I've already heard enough about. which is a shame because I often do enjoy hearing his perspective, but it's just too draining to hear about the same topic for the tenth time.
I get why people want that kind of thing though. I think it might be a personality/taste thing. I'm pretty quick to compartmentalise the shitty things that a franchise or company does and move on from them, which has its upsides and downsides. Others may be less willing to separate the wheat from the chaff, which has its own positives and negatives.
Ultimately, all of this should be in the hands of the creators themselves. All we can do is choose to follow the creators that we feel matches our preferences the closest.
@@Hemlocker Yeah, and I guess I should offer the specification that I'm talking about content creators who purport to cover Magic news in some capacity, even if it's not all they do. If you're someone who really just does deck-techs or lore analysis or whatever, then I get that it would be jarring to suddenly switch to some video about the latest evils of WOTC. But you know, the Pinkertons thing was big enough that not talking about when you talk about other Magic news is a very clear and deliberate choice, and as much as it's easy to get tired of hearing about it, I think in some ways it didn't get enough coverage, in that even though it may have seemed like all anyone was talking about for a couple weeks, it wasn't enough to elicit any kind of response from WOTC. It's still upsetting to me that the response was for a few specific people to act mad about it for a couple weeks and then go on talking about the new products like it was all normal. Maybe I'm getting into a separate issue at this point but I think there's certain stuff that just kind of NEEDS to matter to people who produce content about these subjects, and to brush it off under the banner of "staying positive" is very worth criticizing to me.
@@caulifloodle Fair enough. Personally I'd still say that what "needs" to be talked about should generally still be up to the creators themselves, but I can see why certain issues might feel so severe that they cross that boundary. The Pinkertons scandal might have been an example.
Well done to Vince for challenging Prof's view at 34:50 . I think fair criticism is important, be it either positive or negative but you can't on the one hand say that you have to create 'negative' thumbnails for the algorithm so that you get more viewers and then on the other hand say a negative review wouldn't have some sort of effect on sales. I know that if I see a reputable channel like this say a product isn't worth it or an alternative is better then I will not buy said product.
It's a really interesting topic. Thank you both for the podcast!
also props to the Prof for changing or clarifying his viewpoint!
You guys wondering if you were a part of someone getting into something new, Pleasant Kenobi you got me into both Marvel Snap and way into Warhammer Lore (along with other channels with their deep dives on the insane amount of Warhammer lore there is). And Prof you convinced me to make not one but two pauper commander decks, and also my own version of Jon Irenicus after your season finale episode, which was one of if not the best games of recorded commander content I have ever watched. And you also got my nostalgia firing for Yu-Gi-Oh (my first TCG) with your videos with Team APS and I’ve been playing a little bit of Master Duel lately.
I think its safe to say that your videos do cause people to not buy certain products but on the other hand your videos got me back into magic. WOTC has gotten more money out of me because of you than your videos could take away. Thank you both for all the positivity you bring to the community.
Great episode of Half in the bag !!!
Lol it really does feel that way. I love the chaos
My favourite tea is when entire sets are leaked online months prior to release
Set leak tea, now with 30% more Pinkertons!
I pre-ordered the Tyranid 40k deck, and getting the promo from the LGS made it feel really special. Those promo cards do make a difference in all their forms.
That was one of the greatest intros yet, and that's a high bar!
I’ve loved this conversation
The intro was hilarious, that you then followed into a super thoughtful conversation on life and meaning
Love you guys and yes you’re both a part of my love of Magic
I didn’t even look at the thumbnail, I saw pleasant Kenobi and bryan’s face in my peripheral vision and went, “DIES TO REMOVAL” thank you for making my morning excellent
Wizards messed up since:
Balance is less important than power creep,
They took over every fun format to turn it into their gold donkey,
They started neglecting the physical game for easier online Cashgrab,
They bought the opinion and voice of every magic influencer,
They started printing less creative more whacky cards to cash bait casuals,
They printed important cards for competitive play at higher rarities for more set sales,
They printed more and more "premium products" aka secret lair, mythic editions etc. To grab money inflating the value of foil or high rarity cards by having 10 different "high rarity versions",
They ruined competetive play by custom designing the format with powercrept "must play" cards,
They let magic die for low quality low identity and low creativity design on cards, sets and basically everything portrayed to the outside.
Also the old Employee working conditions issue.
Basically since war of the spark or some time around that
ngl, my interest in magic has plummeted to near zero in the last year. it used to be my main hobby, now i pretty much exclusively play pokemon tcg and warhammer. it is what it is i guess.
On MTG creators bringing success to MTG: Prof and the TCC team, your content got me back into the game after a 10year hiatus.
British person here: Earl Grey and Breakfast Tea are TOTALLY different! Both are black teas but the main difference, which is the unique feature of Earl Grey, is that Earl Grey has bergamot for an added orangey, citrus hint.
Shout-out to Vince's Miniac T shirt @4:00
Love Miniac's content.
Laughed so hard when Vince got up and left 😂
Being jumpscared by seeing myself at 30:55 stepping on Vince again
I enjoxed seeing you step on Vince. Maybe he enjoyed it too.
I can't express enough how much fun I had watching you two play and interact! [His editing was really fresh too!]
That intro was the _longest_ ever buildup to the dumbest joke - A+, absolutely perfect.
You get a thumbs up for that skit. It just kept getting better and I busted out laughing 3 different times. Love the new play on the "has a TH-cam Channel" bit.
Also, I do prefer an Earl Grey over an Eng Breakfast and they are 100% different flavors.
The problem is regardless of what critics say Wizards can basically do whatever they want with Magic because people still throw tons of money at it anyways. The MTG community needs to come together and force change like the DnD community did.
I just watch Dies to Removal. It doesn't matter what the title or thumbnail is as long as I get to see Prof and Vince talking about Magic.
I know it is a few days late for this video, but (for your personal data research) you and my friend Zack are the two main reasons I got into and have been playing Magic for the last 14 months. Thanks, Prof!
Let’s go pioneer on Arena!!!!
10:00 You mean talking in a wrestling announcers voice complaining about every single thing and calling for the doom of magic is not good criticism ? Iam historically disappointed
Leather daddy Hasbro is the only product I need for 2023.
- "Oh daddy, give me those curled foils!"
- (gruff voice) "you've been a bad customer.."
- "So bad, Daddy Hasbro, I'll buy all the worthless collector boosters you want!"
- "AND SECRET LAIRS!"
- "Yessss Daddyyyyy!"
Spell Table with Vince and guests is a must.
Ah yes, 'just doing it for clicks' directed at the guy who can get clicks by literally talking about if a box is good or bad.
Critics are bad for revenue.
So it's the company's mandate to make us believe that it means it's bad for the game.
It's so fascinating that in their individual channels, I feel like Kenobi is waaaaaay more negative. But in these episodes it is the exact opposite xD cool to hear them discuss that!
A buddy of mine is just getting into magic. We had a fantastic game of 6 player edh, he borrowed my izzet dragon tribal deck and ended up winning (and we definitely didn’t hand him that win either.) he had a great time. When he expressed interest in learning how to play he opted to look up tutorial videos online. He likely came across some of your videos. My fear is if he continues to research to decide which commander he wants to build, he is going to stumble upon the critique videos, which tells the algorithm that he needs more negative energy. Then next thing you know he’s going to see nothing but the magic historian or other hyper negative channels and he starts wondering what the problem with this game is. We just want a friend to hang out with, and channels like that are going to prevent this, potentially.
I think you’re absolutely right, fair criticism makes a lot of sense. Blatant hate is a waste of time
"English Breakfast is superior to Earl Gray" It's ok, Vince, not everyone can be correct 🙂
Thing about all those “positive” centric spaces and people who don’t wanna get bogged down in the negative aspects of the game is that sure, other people can respect that and move on to other types of content that speaks to them. They’re still not going to be safe when wotc eventually ruins the game in a way where even the most positive and open minded of mtg players say it’s enough and apathy truly sets in from them too.
The enemy is not and has never been the player base, the enemy is wizard of the coast and their masters at Hasbro. Always has been, always will. Yelling amongst ourself does nothing but let them win.
The poster board with all the MtG flyers was a fun background joke! Love the work the crew does for the set.
The shoutout to Rhystic Studies is fantastic. The game is better for those critics providing thoughtful insight into the visual aspects of the game.
Epic intro I couldn't stop laughing
The price of magic cards is bad for magic
Me looking at the title of this video: “Magic….History…..My bones hurt”
I am new to the channel and TCG. What I enjoy about the channel's perspective is the overall love for the genre and the sincerity of the views. I have never thought that the Prof was trying to be negative for views.
good video as always prof
I'm just getting back to Magic after about 15 years away from game after quitting in High School. Your videos give great information and advice for me to utilize in my choices as a complete plebiscite. I mentioned to a long time player I've been in a commander pod with for a couple months now that I was getting the LOTR starter decks so I could get the exclusives rates and mythics that come in them, and he had no idea that was a thing. Magic is a completely baffling and confusing array of products to sift through as a born again player, and I thank you for your help in doing so. This is an amazing channel.
I genuinely clicked to hear two of my favorite MTG creators have a thoughtful discussion about the roll of critics in an engagement driven space. Commenting for the algorithm.
We critics have checked ourselves thoroughly and found ourselves to be absolutely necessary to MTG.
56:25 Regarding "the health of magic being correlated in part to the health of its creators," it's important to address the issue of reversing causality and the implicit association of the community's well-being with the "big names." While MTG creators have indeed become more prominent than ever before in terms of views and financial success, it is crucial to note that the overall health and quality of the game have declined. This contradicts the notion that increased volume in terms of players or profit necessarily leads to an improved product or experience.
Furthermore, we should not overlook the significant impact of the changes made by Wizards of the Coast to organized play, which essentially led to the demise of the "cottage industry" of MTG content and grassroots event series. The discontinuation of these elements not only resulted in thousands of job losses amongst the professional content community but also dissipated the financial support that once sustained that aspect of the game. It's disheartening to witness the absence of meaningful SCG or CFB premium articles, and the decline of grassroots events that used to occur at least once a month in various regions worldwide.
The focus on collecting rather than playing the game, which WotC seems to prioritize, further exacerbates the issue. The current emphasis on a social fan format, which the game was not originally designed or balanced for, has diminished the desire for players to engage with content that enhance their gameplay. Moreover, the continuous need for card bans in the standard format makes it unappealing to invest $500 USD in a deck that could become obsolete due to these frequent bans. In the modern format, which has gradually veered towards a homogenized "5 color good stuff" approach, the cards themselves have become increasingly powerful, often possessing game-winning abilities, convoluted paragraphs of text and, conditionally free casting costs.
TL;DR: The health of the Magic: The Gathering community is not solely determined by the success of one section of its popular creators. Despite portions of the game reciving increased prominence, the game's overall quality has declined. The changes made by Wizards of the Coast, including the effective discontinuation of organized play, have negatively affected the MTG content industry and grassroots events. The focus on collecting rather than playing, along with constant card bans, format imbalances and, a never ending stream of product releases has dampened enthusiasm among players.
Great point at the end. Even the whiniest, most pedantic critics mean that people still care about what you're putting out. Outrage is preferable to apathy.
I heard of a study that people bond over what they hate more than what they love. In fact a dating site was based around it!
I think its important to remember as a consumer, WotK is not there to be my friend, they aren't doing me any favors. They only want the contents of my wallet. Thats it. They will use every metric to get as much out of every customer as possible. When it comes to critics, When i see a critic who WotK is afraid to interact with, because THEY KNOW they are offering a weak/greedy product. The more I trust the critic. I can honestly say I trust Prof. more than any other outlet. Your growth proves you're a positive influence on the community, and helping to protect us from predictory marketing, Just like the late Total Biscuit (rip). Love ya Prof.
This is the most REAL comedy ive ever seen 😂
Wow the first 5 minutes of this one I could have sworn I was watching an episode of the Command Zone!
MTG isn't really my go-to game but I have enjoyed it, but this video is a great evaluation of the toxic content that is created against a lot of popular IPs. Anger mining, negative media. Great topics that are relevant accross many genres.
You guys are the positive media I consume to bring joy to my day. :)
As someone who plays lots of different kinds of games, mtg really does have a great community behind it. Theres been plenty of games where i cant find hard data and it has ultimately ruined my experience because i cant figure out how something works and the only thing online is a forum post from 8 years ago that says "just do it right and itll work". Meanwhile, mtg has people going in depth for eveey aspect: deck building, why a curve is important, how to increase consistency, why some cards are better even though they read almost the exact same, IN DEPTH RULINGS with a ton of technical talk, product reviews, your deckbox and sleeve reviews (gave me tons of confidence in buying stuff so i didnt feel guilty like i just wasted my money), etc.
my favorite tea is the mysterious concoction my shaman gave me under that waterfall out behind the Dennys. It left me stranded in the astral realm for a month and a half. I woke up in the softest bed I've ever slept in, in a hotel in Algeria.
Great video guys!
I know for a fact that The War Hammer set specifically got Josh from den of nerds channel into war hammer. And now he loves it.
I’d watch a full-length movie of PK going about his day while the Prof appears out of random places and crannies and screams “PACK! OPEN IT!” Before letting loose with a handful of D-tier sealed packs.
Listening to this has reminded me of a Twitter post I saw recently, asking for your hot take about magic, and the one that really popped off was that wotc ruined edh by making all of these commander specific products over the years, and how the power levels of edh has just exploded to almost yugioh levels because of it
Prof, Vince is totally right on the tea thing. I have no idea how Earl Grey became the standard tea here in the states when it's the worst tasting option possible. Not unlike how the Red Delicious apple somehow became the standard apple.
My favorite teas would be orange pekoe, darjeeling, or rooibos varieties
I must applaud Prof and Pleasant Kenobi for doing a spot on impression of LRR's "Tap Tap Concede Podcast" for the first five minutes of the vid!
For me, the appeal of a critical video is not the negativity. But rather the fact that it forces analysis.
I could make a positive video about any Magic product by picking 5 random cards, reading what they do, and imagining possible uses. That says nothing about the product because I could do it for everything. People who always complain are a little better not because you should want that energy in your life, but because at least they're offering some kind of comparison. Nevertheless, those people aren't much improvement because it too is something they can always do. Reality never matches imagination.
The best creators are, as you say, fair critics. But even among them I'm more likely to watch a critical video simply because it takes more effort to say what's wrong than to simply describe something and declare it "good enough."
Top teas for me:
Jasmine (don't steep for too long or too hot, scalding ruins it, imo)
Moroccan mint
Darjeeling
Genmaicha (and popped rice tea, in general)
I keep playing magic because of people like you two. You helped me feel like getting back into the game after over a decade would be a reasonable goal. Been playing consistently for years now. Thanks.
Jasmine, but Earl Grey over English breakfast.
This is kinda random, but am the only one who watches the professor just move his toes around while I listen? It's really nice to just feel like he's not trying to impress, just be himself and talk about something with us like friends.
As creators/influencers you have a voice. This will resonate with your audience both positively and negatively. This does have an effect on product purchases for your viewers but does that affect the overall product sales, unlikely.
Props to the Prof for having a Fagles translation of Odyssey on the shelf:)
I always love travelling to Barceminapolis for work when business takes me there
Speaking of channels that just want to talk about magic for the sake of talking about magic, I highly recommend Chorocojo. Probably the chillest thing in magic youtube. Basically randomly generates a card and finds something neat to say about it for a minute or 2. Like bite sized Rhystic Studies but less academic.
So, the thumbnail caught my eye, but the title and the publisher is what made me watch.
But yes, a lot of people just want to be angry.
Also, I will say that as a former primarily Yugioh player, Yugioh has a very in depth creatorsphere. I'm not sure any one Yugituber is as popular as Tolarian Community College, but so many Yugitubers are incredibly popular within the Yugioh playerbase. I would be surprised if other popular TCGs (Pokemon specifically) didn't have creatorspheres as large as MTG and Yugioh.
Heres some fuel to the whole critic arguement - I ignored all criticism and gameplay videos, ignored all positive and negatives when it came to MoM aftermath. I just saw the cool card I liked.
I bought a booster box, cracked it, and immediately regretted it. Alternatively, I did watch basically only criticisms on and bought Innistrad Midnight Hunt and loved it!
People need criticism but they also need to synthesize the information to their needs. You don't like negativity? Well be prepared to get let down when you buy something you didn't get info on.
Fair criticism is a big reason why I come to this channel. Not only is it NOT bad for the game in my experience, but it allows me to enjoy the game more. If the only voices I heard were relentlessly positive about things that I feel are plainly terrible, I'd probably look around and decide I don't want to be a part of this. The game design is impeccable as always, but the price of game pieces is so high that Wizards/Hasbro should be overjoyed that anyone says even remotely positive things about the product, while they stuff their pockets with the paychecks of addicts
Wizards of the Coast should be extremely ashamed of the decisions they've been making, but they're not, because they're too busy murdering puppies with butter knives, which. based on their decisions, is definitely a thing they do regularly and is not even close to the most horrible thing they do. We can't possibly think of what those things are because we have souls. Wizard's bad.
Love the new lighting! Much softer, sets a better mood!
I actually think both Prof and Kenobi are underestimating the influence of algorithms on content creation/interaction. Yes, it's a more symbiotic relationship than merely "the algorithm says do this", however it is still a relationship where one party (the algorithm) is setting the parameters of that relationship. Similar to how a person's thoughts can be largely dictated by the language and ideas they are immersed within, a person's relationship with media is largely dictated by the method of its delivery. "The medium is the message" is the adage that applies. For example, Twitter has (had?) a strict character limit, which severely limits and shapes what a "conversation" on that platform is, and people quickly adapted to that environment such that the messages they share thrive within the set parameters (short, witty, snarky one-upsmanship).
With algorithmic content delivery, algorithms have set a sort of "content character limit" of what is and is not promoted, and despite how an audience chooses to engage with that, they are beholden to the dynamic that emerges in such a system: provocative, binary extremes vying for attention. Try to "tell" the algorithm to stop functioning that way only by engaging the content it suggests, and see what happens. Algorithms don't necessarily foster negativity, but they do push people towards content bubbles which further reinforce algorithmic delivery, because that is the "best" way for them to function. And it so happens that extreme negativity is very profitable; both for attracting people's attention, and for eliciting a susceptible marketing response.