The character of Shylock is meant to be multi dimensional. Some perceive him as a villain, others as villianised. It depends of your person so please don't have a huge argument. It's like one person likes blue another likes red. Jeez. Personally (having studied the play) I think Shylock is isolated and villainised by the Christians, I mean seriously the acts committed against him are horrible. There is more to the play than the scene so I suggest being educated on it before being crude. :)
the actor's portrayal of the characters is commendable. On the play, it is my personal opinion that the court should have allowed Shylock his 6000 ducats for many reasons and not have forced him to convert to christianity. firstly, a religion that was the cause of his hate towards Antonio, would seem a fitting revenge but, Antonio had on many occasions berated the old man's religion as well. If not for anything but out of the christian spirit of respect, Shylock should not have been as disrespected as he was. this is my personal opinion thats all
I personally think that Portia went quite a bit too far in bringing about 'justice' as she calls it. I feel she should have just let him take the 6000 ducats when he said at last he would take them. No point in making him convert to Christianity. It was really the Christians' fault for the way Shylock acted in the first place if you think about it. If they had treated him well, he wouldn't have felt he need to go and attempt to kill Antonio. That's just what I think.
Hey its not fair, I stand for shylock try to see all of them as a human and there had been injustice to him . Its like Every Christian in Venice Vs Shylock. And lastly Venice fie Upon your law!!!
16:52 I must admit, to see the Jew in that condition is heartbreaking, despite everything else, true Justice would have been to leave the initial conditions the same as the final conditions.
thomasg74 I was pissed at that moment and hoping that somehow the guy would be spared, however, receiving injustice doesn't mean you have to commit it or be a part of it.
thomasg74 Sympathy for those who merit it? So that gives the right to destroy anyone who doesn't fit the description? I didn't sermon, I stated something obvious, if it's beyond your comprehension, I suggest you analyze how society should be instead of how society wants you to be.
well it certainly is a commendable act....... the actors totally pulled it off ........ the end was too good................. in the end u fell sorry for both aggressor and on whom the aggression was carried on.....but its just what life's about.
Al Pacino great actor indeed! I am amused the way they treated jews that time, it is the battle of principles and what you believed in, thou i must say, no blood shall shed or life shall die to seek justice of what others have done unto you.
but the fate shylock suffers...too much. Any one in there right minds would sympathize with him. we are reading the play at school now. wont say i like antonio much
I understand Shylock's hatred and anger towards Antonio and I'll be honest, I don't care for Antonio so much, but Shylock went too far. The best way he could've gotten revenge on Antonio was by proving that he was the better man and not become what Antonio believed he was. He never should've demanded Antonio's flesh in the first place. It was never worth it.Portia gave several chances of mercy and Shylock only cared about getting revenge. So it's not surprising that this would happen. As strange as it may sound, I actually understand why Jessica did what she did. Her world with her father had no place for her and she wanted to be happy with the man she loved and he loved her, and if she was going to be condemned no matter how she chose to live her life, she'd do it while being happy. Her father was too full of hatred and it was another reason why she left him, even though she still loved him. Times were different then. Things should be thought about and seen through the characters during that time period and try to use their own personal situations with themselves for it to make sense.
dude but what about the cruelty antonio did with shylock. i feel its just like mahabharat, everybody thinks the pandavs to be the good ones but there are many reasons why duryodhan had hatred towards pandavas
@@subhamagarwal1665 I'm not denying Antonio's wrongs, but two wrongs don't make a right. In my eyes, Antonio is the lesser of two evils and truth be told, I did want to punch Antonio for he said about Jews. Another harsh reality is that the legal system was rigged and NEVER would've been on any Jew's side at that time. That didn't change until YEARS later. From the beginning, the law was never going to support Shylock. He was so hungry for revenge that he didn't see or understand the reality of the situation until it was too late
under the tempest , PROSPERO By what? by any other house or person? Of any thing the image tell me that Hath kept with thy remembrance. MIRANDA 'Tis far off And rather like a dream than an assurance That my remembrance warrants. Had I not Four or five women once that tended me? PROSPERO Thou hadst, and more, Miranda. But how is it That this lives in thy mind? What seest thou else In the dark backward and abysm of time? If thou remember'st aught ere thou camest here, How thou camest here thou mayst. the merchants of venice at work:
where is portia's speech about mercy? the most important i think was this speech about mercy. shylock's guilt was that he had no mercy for christians, only hate. i think shylock is right by law but not by love. god is love not cold law.
dont you see how shakespeare used hypocrisy throughout . portia gives a speech about mercy to shylock but then has no mercy herself when the tabes turn, they take his daughter, his money and even convert him to christianity. for a while the name of the play was about to be changed to he tragedy of the jew instead of merchant of venice
If you seek a modern-day adaptation of this story, tune in to nearly every TV lawyer ad that flashes before you on a daily basis. Charlatans have been making fortunes off of "the law" in the most lawless of ways for hundreds of years. Pay particular attention to their LAST name, by the way. Make your own determination.
As you urge on justice be assured you shall have justice. Upright judge. Learned judge. If you see the whole production and it's commentary you'll note that Pacino says he'd been asked to play Shylock before but refused because he was afraid the thing would be antiSemetic. But he took this role precisely because it showed how the Catholic church treated them. Here it has nothing to do with race or ethnicity. It has to do with using a strict reading of law to exact personal revenge. Portia gives Shylock an even stricter reading. The law allows not a drop of blood so Shylock gets what he deserves.
I feel bad for Portia. Bassanio just goes on about how he'd scarification her, his wife for antonios life, and when you see her face, she looks so betrayed and upset.
They're disguised as men so you can't tell the difference, at a... Wait... That means back in the time this play was released, Portia and Nerissa, in this scene, they were played by men, dressed as women, disguised as men...
Proverbs 14:22 Do they not err that devise evil? but mercy and truth shall be to them that devise good.-------------------------James 2:8 If ye fulfil the royal law according to the scripture, Thou shalt love thy neighbour as thyself, ye do well:9 But if ye have respect to persons, ye commit sin, and are convinced of the law as transgressors.10 For whosoever shall keep the whole law, and yet offend in one point, he is guilty of all.11 For he that said, Do not commit adultery, said also, Do not kill. Now if thou commit no adultery, yet if thou kill, thou art become a transgressor of the law.12 So speak ye, and so do, as they that shall be judged by the law of liberty.13 For he shall have judgment without mercy, that hath shewed no mercy; and mercy rejoiceth against judgment.
I dont understand a point: Doesnt cutting flesh already means dropping blood ? Are they have to write every single detail ? And why removing charge of death penalty counts as attempt of murder ? Isn't it his right to pull back his charge ?
Well Shakespeare had written this in the Elizabethan era where he was writing for a Christian audience. If this were to take place today, Portia's explanation as to why Antonio should not die (the whole no jot of blood shall flow thing) would be considered in bad law. It is irrelevant and when the bond says pound of flesh it means the blood, tissues, organs, mitochondria, all are included. As for the second part of your question, back then Venice was not a part of Italy but a free city with its own charter and set of laws, it was Venetian law that is an alien ( foreigner;non-Christian) conspired directly or indirectly against as Venetian's life, then half of all his goods and property would be given to the person he conspired against and half to the privy coffer (treasury ) of the state and whether he will face death or not will be decided only by the duke no matter what others say. Hope I helped :)
Hi Inebuolu: To help you understand the plot (or any of Shakespeare's plots) I'd advise you of this- although the wisdom contained in his writings is often massive, and his use of English is unmatched, his plots are RUBBISH! They were made for Elizabethan audiences, and in those days, writers had to be wary of The Church, the monarch, and well as their wealthy patrons, and their plots were often made with an eye to remaining in the favour of the powerful. The plots are usually unbelievable, pure hokum, but they were a vehicle for the actors and the words. The same is true for opera-- fabulous singing, totally unbelievable plots!
People argue and argue about the meaning behind this play. Like with all Shakespeare, and plays in general, it is down to interpretation. The Merchant of Venice is a fundamentally racist play. Remember, at Shakespeare's time many people wouldn't even know what a Jew was - the religion was nowhere near its borders. People need to stop going on and on about who is and isn't the villain. There is no 'perfect' character in the play, all have their massive faults - Shylock has his hate, Antonio his pettiness and Jessica her willingness to condemn another person at the behest of man who may or may not be in love with her. They are all floored but some get more than what they deserved and others, like Antonio and Bassanio, don't. But, again, its just my opinion.
in fact Jews like Armenian and foreigners in Venice we treated with great respect. After all the Republic of Venice was called Serenissima not by chance !
Make you think about the expulsion of the shylocks from Spain, the country and its infrastructure collapsed after 10 years of it happening, the Spanish Monarchs scrambled to get them back, what was their loss became Italy's gain and the merchants made a lot of money from the bonds issued by the Jewish bankers. This is Shakespeare not a day in the life of documentary and not a platform for hate like i have read from some of the comments here. You have sadly missed the entire message.
Even his own daughter Jessica said that her father's intention was not to receive the money back.... Shylock's intention was always to kill Antonio. John 8:42 Jesus said unto them, If God were your Father, ye would love me: for I proceeded forth and came from God; neither came I of myself, but he sent me.43 Why do ye not understand my speech? even because ye cannot hear my word.44 Ye are of your father the devil, and the lusts of your father ye will do. He was a murderer from the beginning, and abode not in the truth, because there is no truth in him. When he speaketh a lie, he speaketh of his own: for he is a liar, and the father of it.45 And because I tell you the truth, ye believe me not.46 Which of you convinceth me of sin? And if I say the truth, why do ye not believe me?47 He that is of God heareth God's words: ye therefore hear them not, because ye are not of God.48 Then answered the Jews, and said unto him, Say we not well that thou art a Samaritan, and hast a devil?49 Jesus answered, I have not a devil; but I honour my Father, and ye do dishonour me.50 And I seek not mine own glory: there is one that seeketh and judgeth.51 Verily, verily, I say unto you, If a man keep my saying, he shall never see death.
![[#SHORTS CLIP] ครูอึ้ง กรรมการอึ้ง ฮ่าๆ l ซานิเบาได้เบา l One Playground](http://i.ytimg.com/vi/qeBTuMJs4t0/mqdefault.jpg)
antonio and portia are just mind blowing.....some great acting. Love it
they went too far taking Shylocks religion away from him! that was heartless and cold
And you know what, such things would actually happen to Jews in that era.
The character of Shylock is meant to be multi dimensional. Some perceive him as a villain, others as villianised. It depends of your person so please don't have a huge argument. It's like one person likes blue another likes red. Jeez. Personally (having studied the play) I think Shylock is isolated and villainised by the Christians, I mean seriously the acts committed against him are horrible. There is more to the play than the scene so I suggest being educated on it before being crude. :)
i gotta play Antonio in a drama competition.....the movie's awesome!!
great help.....
i am playing portias role in the drama.... it helped me a lot
I feel kinda bad for Shylock :(
Same
Me too
One of the best play of Shakespeare's plays
the actor's portrayal of the characters is commendable. On the play, it is my personal opinion that the court should have allowed Shylock his 6000 ducats for many reasons and not have forced him to convert to christianity. firstly, a religion that was the cause of his hate towards Antonio, would seem a fitting revenge but, Antonio had on many occasions berated the old man's religion as well. If not for anything but out of the christian spirit of respect, Shylock should not have been as disrespected as he was. this is my personal opinion thats all
+kshira mushunuri i agreed but not 6000 ducats only his principal 3000 ducats
I personally think that Portia went quite a bit too far in bringing about 'justice' as she calls it. I feel she should have just let him take the 6000 ducats when he said at last he would take them. No point in making him convert to Christianity. It was really the Christians' fault for the way Shylock acted in the first place if you think about it. If they had treated him well, he wouldn't have felt he need to go and attempt to kill Antonio. That's just what I think.
epic love this
love pacino love irons (performance)
Unbelievable acting by Pacino.
I'm gonna die. I got Portia's role and a single line is a paragraph.
Zarah Bacoto good for u plus thier English is worse than memorizing all prime no. from 1 to 1000000000000 I know cuz I've tried
Jeremy Irons and Al Pacino... Oh my God... O.O
Hey its not fair, I stand for shylock try to see all of them as a human and there had been injustice to him .
Its like Every Christian in Venice Vs Shylock.
And lastly Venice fie Upon your law!!!
that's the law for you ....it's an ass.
16:52 I must admit, to see the Jew in that condition is heartbreaking, despite everything else, true Justice would have been to leave the initial conditions the same as the final conditions.
agreed. very touching.
Were you heartbroken when the Jew was preparing to take the life of Antonio? Not likely, you revolting lackey.
thomasg74 I was pissed at that moment and hoping that somehow the guy would be spared, however, receiving injustice doesn't mean you have to commit it or be a part of it.
TheSLK66 The Jew got his justice, keep your sympathy for those who merit it. Your little sermon was cringe-worthy.
thomasg74 Sympathy for those who merit it? So that gives the right to destroy anyone who doesn't fit the description? I didn't sermon, I stated something obvious, if it's beyond your comprehension, I suggest you analyze how society should be instead of how society wants you to be.
Good play ever
Perfect
Wonderful performance by Pachino. It's just a play, powerful meaning of Christianity Antisemitism !!!!!
NICE FOR ANY DECLAMATION
well it certainly is a commendable act....... the actors totally pulled it off ........ the end was too good................. in the end u fell sorry for both aggressor and on whom the aggression was carried on.....but its just what life's about.
Al Pacino great actor indeed! I am amused the way they treated jews that time, it is the battle of principles and what you believed in, thou i must say, no blood shall shed or life shall die to seek justice of what others have done unto you.
nice n heart touching..
but the fate shylock suffers...too much. Any one in there right minds would sympathize with him. we are reading the play at school now. wont say i like antonio much
"Quality of Mercy" is cut😕
Yes, why??
Can anyone tell me the background music at 10:02 it would help me so much, we have a play and i need some intense background soundtrack
hey i commented
I understand Shylock's hatred and anger towards Antonio and I'll be honest, I don't care for Antonio so much, but Shylock went too far. The best way he could've gotten revenge on Antonio was by proving that he was the better man and not become what Antonio believed he was. He never should've demanded Antonio's flesh in the first place. It was never worth it.Portia gave several chances of mercy and Shylock only cared about getting revenge. So it's not surprising that this would happen. As strange as it may sound, I actually understand why Jessica did what she did. Her world with her father had no place for her and she wanted to be happy with the man she loved and he loved her, and if she was going to be condemned no matter how she chose to live her life, she'd do it while being happy. Her father was too full of hatred and it was another reason why she left him, even though she still loved him. Times were different then. Things should be thought about and seen through the characters during that time period and try to use their own personal situations with themselves for it to make sense.
+1femalegeek Excellent points! But, a lifetime spent getting spit on the face can lead one to hate... Just saying....
+1femalegeek i agree
+golperuano yes i agree but greed ist the cause of all
dude but what about the cruelty antonio did with shylock. i feel its just like mahabharat, everybody thinks the pandavs to be the good ones but there are many reasons why duryodhan had hatred towards pandavas
@@subhamagarwal1665 I'm not denying Antonio's wrongs, but two wrongs don't make a right. In my eyes, Antonio is the lesser of two evils and truth be told, I did want to punch Antonio for he said about Jews. Another harsh reality is that the legal system was rigged and NEVER would've been on any Jew's side at that time. That didn't change until YEARS later. From the beginning, the law was never going to support Shylock. He was so hungry for revenge that he didn't see or understand the reality of the situation until it was too late
damn
damn ur scarrryyyyyy
the script in the video doesn t match the script in the book lol
dammmmmmm. its deep
under the tempest , PROSPERO
By what? by any other house or person?
Of any thing the image tell me that
Hath kept with thy remembrance.
MIRANDA
'Tis far off
And rather like a dream than an assurance
That my remembrance warrants. Had I not
Four or five women once that tended me?
PROSPERO
Thou hadst, and more, Miranda. But how is it
That this lives in thy mind? What seest thou else
In the dark backward and abysm of time?
If thou remember'st aught ere thou camest here,
How thou camest here thou mayst.
the merchants of venice at work:
I love the letter of the law.😀
why is it cut?!
where is portia's speech about mercy? the most important i think was this speech about mercy. shylock's guilt was that he had no mercy for christians, only hate. i think shylock is right by law but not by love. god is love not cold law.
dont you see how shakespeare used hypocrisy throughout . portia gives a speech about mercy to shylock but then has no mercy herself when the tabes turn, they take his daughter, his money and even convert him to christianity. for a while the name of the play was about to be changed to he tragedy of the jew instead of merchant of venice
@@HarshSingh-tt4tz "and forgive us our debts, as we also have forgiven our debtors" if you dont give mercy you dont deserve mercy.
It’s literally been cut from the scene...
If you seek a modern-day adaptation of this story, tune in to nearly every TV lawyer ad that flashes before you on a daily basis. Charlatans have been making fortunes off of "the law" in the most lawless of ways for hundreds of years. Pay particular attention to their LAST name, by the way. Make your own determination.
Why was Portia's mercy speech cut?
no. feel the same. they provoke him to this. shylock wasn't rude with Anonio, but Antonio kept pressuring on him.
As you urge on justice be assured you shall have justice.
Upright judge. Learned judge.
If you see the whole production and it's commentary you'll note that Pacino says he'd been asked to play Shylock before but refused because he was afraid the thing would be antiSemetic. But he took this role precisely because it showed how the Catholic church treated them. Here it has nothing to do with race or ethnicity. It has to do with using a strict reading of law to exact personal revenge. Portia gives Shylock an even stricter reading. The law allows not a drop of blood so Shylock gets what he deserves.
Nice thank you!
A Pound Of -Heat 💚
It's not too bad, but better than previous 🤔🤔🤨🤨🤨☺️☺️☺️
good
I feel bad for Portia. Bassanio just goes on about how he'd scarification her, his wife for antonios life, and when you see her face, she looks so betrayed and upset.
Bassanio was a fake man and a lousy one too. He didn't deserve a woman like Portia. He is as detestable as his friend, Antonio.
Well I heard that women were not allowed in the court room in those days
But I see a lot of lady in there laces in this court room
They're disguised as men so you can't tell the difference, at a... Wait... That means back in the time this play was released, Portia and Nerissa, in this scene, they were played by men, dressed as women, disguised as men...
Seán Egan look in the background those people dressing like women aren't cross dressing men
#justice4Shylock
Best play
What is the name of the music used
this lesson is there in my English textbook 9Gujarat Board
Shylock got countered soo hard....
naah..just like me you don't like happy endings.!!
Who else is from the heathland school here
Money lead money is great and the solution is to find something grater and that's the word allah Akbar means God is greater you
This would be 10 times better if it had Phoenix wright music
Or if it hadn’t been cut.
How the tables have turned
11:23 Portia: OBJECTION (TURNABOUT MODE ACTIVATE)
Proverbs 14:22 Do they not err that devise evil? but mercy and truth shall be to them that devise good.-------------------------James 2:8 If ye fulfil the royal law according to the scripture, Thou shalt love thy neighbour as thyself, ye do well:9 But if ye have respect to persons, ye commit sin, and are convinced of the law as transgressors.10 For whosoever shall keep the whole law, and yet offend in one point, he is guilty of all.11 For he that said, Do not commit adultery, said also, Do not kill. Now if thou commit no adultery, yet if thou kill, thou art become a transgressor of the law.12 So speak ye, and so do, as they that shall be judged by the law of liberty.13 For he shall have judgment without mercy, that hath shewed no mercy; and mercy rejoiceth against judgment.
I dont understand a point: Doesnt cutting flesh already means dropping blood ? Are they have to write every single detail ? And why removing charge of death penalty counts as attempt of murder ? Isn't it his right to pull back his charge ?
Well Shakespeare had written this in the Elizabethan era where he was writing for a Christian audience. If this were to take place today, Portia's explanation as to why Antonio should not die (the whole no jot of blood shall flow thing) would be considered in bad law. It is irrelevant and when the bond says pound of flesh it means the blood, tissues, organs, mitochondria, all are included. As for the second part of your question, back then Venice was not a part of Italy but a free city with its own charter and set of laws, it was Venetian law that is an alien ( foreigner;non-Christian) conspired directly or indirectly against as Venetian's life, then half of all his goods and property would be given to the person he conspired against and half to the privy coffer (treasury ) of the state and whether he will face death or not will be decided only by the duke no matter what others say. Hope I helped :)
Ayushi Dutta So demanding death in a contract is illegal in Venice ?
Hi Inebuolu:
To help you understand the plot (or any of Shakespeare's plots) I'd advise you of this- although the wisdom contained in his writings is often massive, and his use of English is unmatched, his plots are RUBBISH!
They were made for Elizabethan audiences, and in those days, writers had to be wary of The Church, the monarch, and well as their wealthy patrons, and their plots were often made with an eye to remaining in the favour of the powerful. The plots are usually unbelievable, pure hokum, but they were a vehicle for the actors and the words.
The same is true for opera-- fabulous singing, totally unbelievable plots!
Thanks both of you
🤔🤔🤔
why does Antonio like bissanio that much
PIXELSLASH
People argue and argue about the meaning behind this play. Like with all Shakespeare, and plays in general, it is down to interpretation. The Merchant of Venice is a fundamentally racist play. Remember, at Shakespeare's time many people wouldn't even know what a Jew was - the religion was nowhere near its borders. People need to stop going on and on about who is and isn't the villain. There is no 'perfect' character in the play, all have their massive faults - Shylock has his hate, Antonio his pettiness and Jessica her willingness to condemn another person at the behest of man who may or may not be in love with her. They are all floored but some get more than what they deserved and others, like Antonio and Bassanio, don't. But, again, its just my opinion.
in fact Jews like Armenian and foreigners in Venice we treated with great respect. After all the Republic of Venice was called Serenissima not by chance !
Writing an exam on this tomorrow
l love Portia
poor shylock
IS SHYLOCK REALLY THE ANTAGONIST???????????? PHILOSOPHICAL QUESTION
maybe the real shylock was the friends we made along the way
@@uzidayo corona
innit
Make you think about the expulsion of the shylocks from Spain, the country and its infrastructure collapsed after 10 years of it happening, the Spanish Monarchs scrambled to get them back, what was their loss became Italy's gain and the merchants made a lot of money from the bonds issued by the Jewish bankers. This is Shakespeare not a day in the life of documentary and not a platform for hate like i have read from some of the comments here. You have sadly missed the entire message.
i am gratiano
Tables turned.
Is it bad that I feel like shylock deserves better
Is it weird that I actually feel sad for shylock?
basicly, Venice law forces you to act on your accusations, even if you decide not to act on them or you yourself ill be punished........... what?
INJUSTICE THATS WHAT ITS ALL ABOUT.
Even his own daughter Jessica said that her father's intention was not to receive the money back.... Shylock's intention was always to kill Antonio. John 8:42 Jesus said unto them, If God were your Father, ye would love me: for I proceeded forth and came from God; neither came I of myself, but he sent me.43 Why do ye not understand my speech? even because ye cannot hear my word.44 Ye are of your father the devil, and the lusts of your father ye will do. He was a murderer from the beginning, and abode not in the truth, because there is no truth in him. When he speaketh a lie, he speaketh of his own: for he is a liar, and the father of it.45 And because I tell you the truth, ye believe me not.46 Which of you convinceth me of sin? And if I say the truth, why do ye not believe me?47 He that is of God heareth God's words: ye therefore hear them not, because ye are not of God.48 Then answered the Jews, and said unto him, Say we not well that thou art a Samaritan, and hast a devil?49 Jesus answered, I have not a devil; but I honour my Father, and ye do dishonour me.50 And I seek not mine own glory: there is one that seeketh and judgeth.51 Verily, verily, I say unto you, If a man keep my saying, he shall never see death.
isn't blood implicit
No its cheating
Please translate this to Hindi
The downfall of the jew is his pride... as it was then, and as it continues today
I'm on Antonio's side. Shylock is such a cunning person.
good