Austal Offshore Patrol 60

แชร์
ฝัง
  • เผยแพร่เมื่อ 13 ม.ค. 2025

ความคิดเห็น • 50

  • @anthonywarwick6090
    @anthonywarwick6090 2 ปีที่แล้ว +16

    Certainly like to see at least ten of these with 40 mm bofor canon, a 30mm canon on each side, decoys and anti air systems. Got to beef the RAN up.

    • @DavidOlver
      @DavidOlver 5 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

      the 40 mm more up front and a searam behind it

    • @DavidOlver
      @DavidOlver 5 หลายเดือนก่อน

      th-cam.com/video/q9Ajj7JS9EM/w-d-xo.html

  • @danielcampbell9950
    @danielcampbell9950 2 ปีที่แล้ว +24

    I'd be interested to see Austal put a missile vessel proposal forward, something with 8-12 Tomahawk Block V's or Konsberg NSM. Reckon RAN and Indonesia might go for that.

    • @robertopiedimonte2078
      @robertopiedimonte2078 ปีที่แล้ว

      Still talking about those things !?!
      Why ???
      Radar horizon of this ship is around 10 nautical miles, why must be armed with weapons having hundreds of nm range? It's like having a gun in a dark werehouse, you have no idea where to shoot !!!
      Cause this ship operate in EEZ if you know where is/are target/s you can even send there several trainers (Hawk) armed with missiles in hours...
      It's a patrol ship, let her patrol (or if you prefer is a police "patrol" car not a SWAT team on an armored MRAP, you'll never send a SWAT team on patrol it's a waste).
      On top optimum could be 2 sideway 25/30mm anti-drone/small-boat and a 76mm Superapido gun with Dart and Vulcano munitions so to cover 5nm anti-missile or 20nm anti-ship range, but a cheaper single 30mm will fit well for her mission.
      76mm is perfect for few larger OPV reaching Christmas or Cocos islands.
      Never forget this are peace time ship with "big" opponents sometimes as 100.000 tons merchant that's why a 76mm on OPV maybe on mission to far for our planes.
      By the way if you want to sink for sure a ship and you can get so close is better use a torpedo even a 324mm light one (same weapon as on Frigate/Destroyer)

    • @DavidOlver
      @DavidOlver 5 หลายเดือนก่อน

      th-cam.com/video/q9Ajj7JS9EM/w-d-xo.html

    • @DavidOlver
      @DavidOlver 2 หลายเดือนก่อน

      Chamsuri II-class patrol-boat killer medium rocket (PKMR) | Is it innovative or archaic?
      th-cam.com/video/UUP6Y6rmOwI/w-d-xo.html
      look as the weapons on this small boat

  • @ianrobinson8974
    @ianrobinson8974 2 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    12/10/2022 Good show Austal. These boats are next generation to those two which the RAN is getting soon; not to mention their older sisters. When did tis design option come about. You going from boats to ships keep going!

  • @jhnmusa1786
    @jhnmusa1786 10 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Indonesia dan Malaysia dah la jgn bergaduh ayuh bersatu di jalan Allah

  • @goverat
    @goverat 3 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    How do you intend on getting an accurate gun with only 2D radars?

  • @jaredphillips889
    @jaredphillips889 2 ปีที่แล้ว +5

    Let's get some of these in the U.S

    • @anthonywarwick6090
      @anthonywarwick6090 2 ปีที่แล้ว

      Be nice to have them m Australia. Currently building Lursen 80 m OPVs with virtually zero armament

    • @robertopiedimonte2078
      @robertopiedimonte2078 ปีที่แล้ว

      You have Sentinel class in USCG that fit perfectly just to expensive in my opinion, this are a little bit to large (so expensive again) for a peace time (not warship) vessell

  • @phil_nebula676
    @phil_nebula676 3 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    The 60M OPV would be perfect for both the Philippine Coast Guard and Philippine Navy, is especially in the southern waterways like Sulu Islands, Tawi-tawi, and Visayas Islands. Ideally not as replacement for older OPV. But supplementing them and freeing up other assets like the upcoming HDP-2200+ OPV for the West Philippine Sea where its more needed. Also could be used by the PCG escorting re-supply mission to the Sierra Madre.

  • @anthonywarwick6090
    @anthonywarwick6090 2 ปีที่แล้ว +5

    RAN is wasting its money on Lursen OPVs we should be buying variants of these

  • @pmcastillo2166
    @pmcastillo2166 ปีที่แล้ว +4

    60 meter is enough size for battle.. less expensive.

  • @davestoneband
    @davestoneband 2 ปีที่แล้ว +2

    Is the RAN ordering any of these anyone aware of?

    • @davestoneband
      @davestoneband 2 ปีที่แล้ว

      @@carisi2k11 Thanks for for your reply Craig.

  • @rosevitelli5814
    @rosevitelli5814 2 ปีที่แล้ว +2

    I like it very nice

  • @watermirror
    @watermirror 2 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    has mine-avoidance sonar for a 60m opv, yet didn't include ffbnw HMS for their 83.4m opv design. even if their client didn't require HMS, wouldn't it be better to include ffbnw HMS to make the opv versatile & the product more attractive

  • @NelsonLaud-t3g
    @NelsonLaud-t3g 5 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    How much per unit

    • @olivervalera4074
      @olivervalera4074 3 หลายเดือนก่อน

      I guess arround 50 million. The aluminum hall 58 mt vertion for trinidad and tobago cost 44 million the unit.

  • @MPKK746
    @MPKK746 2 หลายเดือนก่อน

    I think for rear arms one ciws should be better option than anti air missiles

  • @goutamdas2083
    @goutamdas2083 7 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    We need this type of vessel for Indian Navy

  • @rsdi_art
    @rsdi_art 2 ปีที่แล้ว +2

    Awesome

  • @crlsking7514
    @crlsking7514 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    This is good for the coasr guard

  • @nasigorengpecelesteh1506
    @nasigorengpecelesteh1506 11 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Subhanallah cukup bagus

  • @GermanGreetings
    @GermanGreetings 8 หลายเดือนก่อน

    A beast... if necessary :)

  • @arminjoemarblanche1948
    @arminjoemarblanche1948 8 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Additional ships for the PCG

  • @benamarmohammedadam9243
    @benamarmohammedadam9243 8 วันที่ผ่านมา

    perfect

  • @ykk6345
    @ykk6345 2 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    工場を日本に建設すべきだね。海上保安庁に採用させるのだよ。

  • @nicholasong2760
    @nicholasong2760 9 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Proposal for armaments
    2x Typhoon MK-30c
    1 x SIMBAD RC
    8 x Spike ER 2

  • @zinsta
    @zinsta 2 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    I swear I'm the only one hear

    • @jaredphillips889
      @jaredphillips889 2 ปีที่แล้ว +2

      Here*

    • @zinsta
      @zinsta 2 ปีที่แล้ว

      @@jaredphillips889 seriously rude git 😒

  • @WestValleyTransparency
    @WestValleyTransparency 2 ปีที่แล้ว +2

    Too bad it doesn't have VLS, and is constrained to 26 knots. This would be a perfect vessel to harass adversary ships and support other surface vessels. Even better if this was a frigate.

    • @robertopiedimonte2078
      @robertopiedimonte2078 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      😂🤣😂 no only Destroyers with hundreds of missiles are true warship!!! Others are just support ships...
      (except airplane carriers 😎)

  • @triplez300
    @triplez300 2 ปีที่แล้ว

    Why not something like Chinese Type 22 missile boat? Australia need many of those boats to defend the costal line.

    • @mistergnat638
      @mistergnat638 2 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      bruh

    • @robman2095
      @robman2095 2 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      Well we are not going to buy off the Chinese to defend ourselves against the Chinese 😂

    • @triplez300
      @triplez300 2 ปีที่แล้ว

      @@robman2095 Can you even read properly? "Something like" Duh!

    • @darren5971
      @darren5971 ปีที่แล้ว

      @@triplez300 You said it Duh Fk chinese vessels you can stick them up your bum .We make better ships in Australia anyway .I think the problem here is you can't Wright properly .

    • @triplez300
      @triplez300 ปีที่แล้ว

      @@darren5971 Are you effing your own mum now or what?

  • @turcenoarthurjamil4364
    @turcenoarthurjamil4364 2 ปีที่แล้ว

    and then the Philippines Canceled their order of these. LOL

    • @darren5971
      @darren5971 ปีที่แล้ว

      Astal should leave the Philippines

    • @Lito66_J
      @Lito66_J 10 หลายเดือนก่อน

      😅

  • @nicholasong2760
    @nicholasong2760 9 หลายเดือนก่อน

    This ship is so unsafe, as there are two ladders at the back of ship. This enables enemy commando to sneek in on the naval crew

  • @yank-tc8bz
    @yank-tc8bz ปีที่แล้ว

    Great but lose the awful music