You don't need the perfect histogram for amazing astrophotography results!

แชร์
ฝัง
  • เผยแพร่เมื่อ 30 ก.ย. 2024

ความคิดเห็น • 7

  • @crislato
    @crislato ปีที่แล้ว +1

    That's Photoshop?

    • @Naztronomy
      @Naztronomy  ปีที่แล้ว

      Yep! Photoshop 2023.

  • @nikaxstrophotography
    @nikaxstrophotography ปีที่แล้ว

    why photoshop? I don't really get this video and what you are trying to achieve? It's overcomplicates what you are trying to say.

    • @Naztronomy
      @Naztronomy  ปีที่แล้ว +1

      Photoshop is the best tool I can think of for histogram manipulation. This isn't meant to be a full processing video, just that you can take data from under/over exposed images and still make it look good. You can also use Gimp instead of photoshop to achieve similar results. I have other videos on processing if you're looking for that.
      If you have specific questions, I'm happy to answer.

    • @nikaxstrophotography
      @nikaxstrophotography ปีที่แล้ว

      @@Naztronomy What's the point of making a flat look good though? It doesn't work that way when stacking, a flat needs to be exposed properly when acquired for it to work when stacking/calibrating

    • @Naztronomy
      @Naztronomy  ปีที่แล้ว +1

      @@nikaxstrophotography I think I can see where the confusion is. The video is just to cover how the histogram works and how you can read it and not worry about over/under exposing either your individual flats or lights, as long as you're not clipping your data.
      I'm not asking anyone to manipulate any of the frames individually before stacking. That would make stacking more difficult.

    • @nikaxstrophotography
      @nikaxstrophotography ปีที่แล้ว +1

      @@Naztronomy thanks for the explainer