Dean Radin - Do Angels and Demons Exist?

แชร์
ฝัง
  • เผยแพร่เมื่อ 20 มิ.ย. 2024
  • Follow us on Instagram for announcements, giveaways, and more: shorturl.at/rwC16
    Many theologians take angels and demons seriously. Why? Certainly, most human beings believe in angels and demons. Anecdotal cases are legion. Certainly, such nonphysical beings, in one form or another, populate most of the world’s religions. But angels and demons seem out of place, anachronistic, in our modern world. Is there anything here we should take seriously?
    Get subscriber-only benefits with a free Closer To Truth account today: shorturl.at/ajRZ8
    Watch more interviews on this topic: shorturl.at/PJ46O
    Dean Radin is a researcher and author in the field of parapsychology. He is also co-editor-in-chief of the journal Explore: The Journal of Science and Healing.
    Subscribe to the Closer To Truth podcast to listen to new episodes every Wednesday: shorturl.at/hwGP3
    Closer To Truth, hosted by Robert Lawrence Kuhn and directed by Peter Getzels, presents the world’s greatest thinkers exploring humanity’s deepest questions. Discover fundamental issues of existence. Engage new and diverse ways of thinking. Appreciate intense debates. Share your own opinions. Seek your own answers.

ความคิดเห็น • 227

  • @stevenpickering5566
    @stevenpickering5566 หลายเดือนก่อน +10

    Believing in angels and demons means we haven’t progressed much in over 7000 years!

    • @stevefrompolaca2403
      @stevefrompolaca2403 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

      I would add that our history of endless barbaric wars to this very day is absolute proof of your thesis ;)

    • @isaacklanderud9773
      @isaacklanderud9773 หลายเดือนก่อน +5

      How does that mean we haven't progressed much in over 7000 years?

    • @Corteum
      @Corteum 28 วันที่ผ่านมา

      None of what you said makes any logical sense. Progress has happened in many different ways in humna civilization. The fact that a minority of humans believe in some biblical definition of angels and demons in no way suggests that humanity has no made progress. That's some kind of backwards logic.

    • @dis4980
      @dis4980 22 วันที่ผ่านมา

      Actually humans have regressed.

    • @Corteum
      @Corteum 22 วันที่ผ่านมา

      Put it into context: Only a small handful of ppl believe in angels and demons as described in religous books.

  • @vvolfflovv
    @vvolfflovv หลายเดือนก่อน +4

    If the 2020s have taught me anything, it's that I know nothing

  • @killbotone6210
    @killbotone6210 หลายเดือนก่อน +11

    Well if they do then they gotta start paying some damn Tax. I'm sick of these woke free loading mythical entities.

  • @sujok-acupuncture9246
    @sujok-acupuncture9246 หลายเดือนก่อน +7

    These are subject of esoteric science and they always remain hidden . Most of us are not sure if it's real or not.

  • @Archeidos-Arcana
    @Archeidos-Arcana หลายเดือนก่อน +8

    A message for the rigid material-empiricists: reality does not care if it neatly conforms to the map of our sense perception. It does not even need to yield itself to OUR logico-conceptual structures. No, we attempt to build these structures in a way that is in accord with IT.

    • @deanodebo
      @deanodebo หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      Exactly. They literally deny knowledge itself by way of worldview

    • @pablocosentino2126
      @pablocosentino2126 หลายเดือนก่อน

      So do you thing angels are demons are real ?

    • @deanodebo
      @deanodebo หลายเดือนก่อน

      @@pablocosentino2126 I do. What do you think is real and why do you think that?

    • @Archeidos-Arcana
      @Archeidos-Arcana หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      @@pablocosentino2126 I tend to take a phenomenological view of phenomenality; meaning that I'm not quick to divide things up into object/subject and observer/observed. I think the things that our ancestors were attempting to describe with the concept of angels and demons are very much "real" -- but I'm more willing to describe them upon psychological grounds. I don't, however -- think that these notions can be REDUCED to mere psychological explanations; this is where I differ from the ontology of 'the many' today.
      Such a material view not only is highly likely to be incomplete; but also renders our world as inhuman and inhospitable.

    • @pablocosentino2126
      @pablocosentino2126 หลายเดือนก่อน

      I think "real" are things that can be perceived by our senses....
      There is no prove of angels or demons...

  • @XOPOIIIO
    @XOPOIIIO หลายเดือนก่อน +5

    Interestingly that people using DMT talking about some small creatures living there, like gnomes or something, their descriptions are surprisingly consistent. If these are real creatures or some subconscious artifact, doesn't matter, our consciousness is the only reality we know anyway.

    • @Obeijin
      @Obeijin หลายเดือนก่อน

      DMT is hard to get ...

    • @Corteum
      @Corteum 28 วันที่ผ่านมา

      What we should be doing is running well designed experiments to see if we can communicate with these entitie and get some usable intel or information that enables us to solve our real-world problems and challenges. And if that can be done consistently. then maybe those things are not as imaginary as some would believe.

  • @halcyon2864
    @halcyon2864 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

    All in the dream, like our own existence, only a dream. Reality has no concepts, doesn't have forms, has no location and always here at this moment.

  • @browngreen933
    @browngreen933 หลายเดือนก่อน +9

    I like this interpretation. I myself felt demonic possession two years ago when the winter death-spirit (windigo) tried to enter my body to the point where i cried out: "Go away! Go away!" I knew it was my own mental illness causing it, but it sure seemed like an independent entity was in the room with me. Unconscious projection would explain a lot of weird things people honestly experience, yet still within physical reality without recourse to the full-blown supernatural. 😮

  • @Brody.W
    @Brody.W หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    Thanks! I listened to Dean Radins book on ESP over and over again. It's awesome. Thank you for this interview. Jesus loves us.

    • @joyfulnoise349
      @joyfulnoise349 21 วันที่ผ่านมา

      Jesus was a man made myth

  • @toadster_strudel
    @toadster_strudel หลายเดือนก่อน +13

    Here are two men, conditioned to only think about phenomenon in a material sense, discussing whether immaterial beings exist or not. These concepts are far too abstract, far beyond their present ability to comprehend this stuff. If you went to a person with only a high school diploma and attempted to explain theoretical physics, cosmology, advanced calculus, etc., it would go completely over their head. It's not that they are too stupid to understand these concepts, but because they've never been introduced to them before. They also hold very strong biases against anything nonphysical, anything non material. We see evidence of unexplained phenomenon all of the time. These things do exist, we just don't know what they are. We haven't yet been able to study them in a controlled setting. The concept of a multiverse is not testable, it can not be tested or observed, yet, many scientists appear to have a fetish for it. Therefore, belief in the multiverse is akin to belief in angels and demons. It might not be "scientific" to believe in angels and demons, but that doesn't stop reasonable people from believing in them any way.

    • @cinikcynic3087
      @cinikcynic3087 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      Heheh. Clever people have been down that route in the past. Thats why the focus is on empirical evidence today. We all know you cannot disprove a negative. I am sure there are many claims by other people that you consider idiotic.

    • @toadster_strudel
      @toadster_strudel หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      @cinikcynic3087 True. I'm not even going so far as to say that any unexplained phenomenon are angels, ghosts, or extraterrestrials. That's making a very bold claim. But, something is going on, these phenomenon do respond to us. They're not just an illusion or magical thinking.

    • @deanodebo
      @deanodebo หลายเดือนก่อน

      @@cinikcynic3087wait a second. You bring up proof. Can you prove anything with certainty?

    • @cinikcynic3087
      @cinikcynic3087 หลายเดือนก่อน

      @@deanodebo Nobody can dear. That's why we have theories. Best possible explanation to date.

    • @deanodebo
      @deanodebo หลายเดือนก่อน

      @@cinikcynic3087 can you prove that?

  • @NataliaCh93
    @NataliaCh93 หลายเดือนก่อน +7

    And what about Guardian Angels? Cause we all have one and I can tell You Angels are real and with twisted sense of humor

    • @setaihedron
      @setaihedron หลายเดือนก่อน

      It appears inevitable that in the future we will through evolution or technological development transcend the ordinary dimensions of space and time. It seems obvious then that " guardian angels " are merely our future selves affecting their own past.

    • @davenchop
      @davenchop หลายเดือนก่อน

      do children starving to death in africa have a guardian angel..what a bunch of complete idioitic
      nonsense

  • @vitus.verdegast
    @vitus.verdegast หลายเดือนก่อน +2

    Angels and demons are symbolic characters in the dramas we create about our own desires and fears. Children can relate to personalities more readily than the can to abstract concepts, but with maturity they can see what lies behind the metaphor. Good and evil spirits are real because the human mind is real. Likewise, Mickey Mouse is real-- but he's a real cartoon, not a real mouse.

    • @deanodebo
      @deanodebo หลายเดือนก่อน

      What do you think a “mouse” is? It’s a category.
      Do you think some simplistic appeal to a particular dubitable theory in biology accurately represents reality?
      Come on man. Don’t be so pedestrian.

    • @ashm-wl4xg
      @ashm-wl4xg หลายเดือนก่อน

      Most People are brainwashed from childhood by their “parents” religious beliefs… all to “belong to a community or tribe”…
      Scriptures are nothing but all Fairytales and stories of ancient times told to their communities to “belong” and behave in certain ways and “traditions”….
      Communities telling stories and made up moral Fairytales over time become “scripture” by men telling stories for money and fame and prestige…!!
      How come some religion only have some angles or no angles or demons or visa versa …??
      No Jhinns in the western or Asian world …
      No Vampires or Dracula or werewolf’s in eastern world or traditions …
      Of course then there is the “headless horseman” in the northeast early American traditions…😂😂
      Funny how they (Angle/Demons) all seem to follow or remain in certain forms and cultural narrative but don’t go anywhere else or not experienced anywhere else.

    • @vitus.verdegast
      @vitus.verdegast หลายเดือนก่อน

      @@deanodebo Mice are real just as humans are real, but angels and demons are products of human imagination just as cartoon characters are.

  • @user-if1ly5sn5f
    @user-if1ly5sn5f หลายเดือนก่อน

    So here’s a thought. If the neurons are alive and activating in response to stimuli then maybe all the patterns we think of, we share the neurons with them so the thoughts can go out of control unless we process or let them go. Like if we don’t process then we keep bringing back the big pattern and those could be like multiple personalities and such. Infinite patterns but not processing will bring back up the whole thing. Maybe that’s why we gotta process things before refilling our cup.

  • @hardworkingcriminal4873
    @hardworkingcriminal4873 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

    I promise i listened to all 10mins 10secs at what point did he answer the question??

  • @tanshihus1
    @tanshihus1 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Does anyone know how old this interview is? Is Radin still alive? Does anyone else know what it is they're talking about? Does anyone else know what C12H10N2 refers to? Does anyone care?

    • @piehound
      @piehound หลายเดือนก่อน

      I googled it. This is what i found. The term 'azobenzene' or simply 'azo' is often used to refer to a wide class of similar compounds. These azo compounds are considered as derivatives of diazene (diimide), and are sometimes referred to as 'diazenes'. It's knowledge. What it has to do with angels and demons i don't know.

    • @tanshihus1
      @tanshihus1 หลายเดือนก่อน

      @@piehound Congratulations for being brave. If you read the Wikipedia article you'll find all of the sources for Harmane. Unfortunately the authors have scrubbed the clinical usage from the definition. It's an MAOI used in combination with DMT during psychedelic drug trips. The Angel's and Demons are the same self transforming machine elves that McKenna describes in his drug experiences.

  • @kallianpublico7517
    @kallianpublico7517 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    Do materialists in science have a principle, like a Popper's Principle, for moral decision making when it comes to experimentation? Can it override government mandates?
    The relationship between science and government in different countries could be compared to malevolent or benevolent beings.
    It would be interesting to discuss how much the pursuit of science is guided by moral consideration and not national security. It would be interesting to characterize the angels and demons of scientific progress and threats.

    • @deanodebo
      @deanodebo หลายเดือนก่อน

      Interesting comment. Well done.
      My input is that the demonic temptation is to lure us to believe that science produces truth

  • @Archeidos-Arcana
    @Archeidos-Arcana หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    Do they exist in the way that religions have typically thought of them? Probably not. Do they exist in some other sense? I find it highly unlikely that we would have developed such beliefs if there wasn't a kernel of truth to them (and/or serving a functional purpose).

    • @johnz8843
      @johnz8843 หลายเดือนก่อน

      I think unconscious drives and strong passions which exert power over volitions have been forces humans have tried to name and understand, often construeing them as how they appear to us -- conscious spirits or godlike influences. There could be something more to them but at this point the weight of the evidence is not there.

    • @The_Great_Beyond
      @The_Great_Beyond หลายเดือนก่อน

      It is a question of morals I think. Of percieving of wright and wrong

    • @Archeidos-Arcana
      @Archeidos-Arcana หลายเดือนก่อน

      @@The_Great_Beyond I think that's an aspect, sure. At a deeper level though, why is duality seemingly an inherent property of every structure within reality? Why do we divide the world into object and subject -- the observed and the observer? Why does it take an electron and a proton for atoms to form? Why is chirality observed throughout nature?
      I think these questions are all related.

    • @digitalfootballer9032
      @digitalfootballer9032 หลายเดือนก่อน

      I think you make a pretty good point. I would put ghosts/spirits in the same category. I actually dismissed all of this kind of stuff as BS for years until I actually watched a physical item float slowly down a hallway about 10 feet then drop to the ground (it was a Halloween decoration that was pinned up on my housemates door, it was hard plastic and relatively heavy unlike a paper item that may have appeared to float). Now I don't know what caused that but my housemate saw it as well and it freaked us out. Was it a spirit or a demon? Probably not. But it was something, and what that is I have no clue.

  • @oluckyman
    @oluckyman หลายเดือนก่อน +2

    There's the Melbourne Demons and the LA Angels.

  • @DouglasVoigt-tu3xb
    @DouglasVoigt-tu3xb หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    Do you believe in good and evil? I do. Begs the question…what is real? Any closer to truth?

  • @piehound
    @piehound หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    I can create my own interpretation based on the original Greek word for " ANGEL." As simply as possible it means MESSENGER . . . no more and no less. And i add that absolutely everything that exists can carry a message. Whether it's carried explicitly. Or if we READ OUR OWN THOUGHTS and INTERPRETATIONS INTO whatever happens. It's all " ANGELIC. " Or if you wish " DEMONIC. " Semantics is king in this case. The ancients did no more than we do today. They used their limited knowledge (as we today use our limited knowledge) to describe natural events that for lack of better words are difficult to put into simple concepts. Bada - bing. Mystery solved.

  • @0pieamii
    @0pieamii หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    the ubiquitous cookie monster strikes at even hard nosed scientists 🍪🧌

  • @zfm1097
    @zfm1097 หลายเดือนก่อน

    The ability to resist the cookie doesn't make any sense in the world we adapted for. We'd raid a beehive occasionally, otherwise we'd eat fruit that comes with fibre that uses up energy to process (along with all the other plants) and might not be that sweet. So, the instinct to eat it overwhelms us. I think 'supernatural experiences' are impossible to convey to anyone else, but can have circumstancial qualities impossible to dismiss for those who experience them.

  • @Rod-Wheeler
    @Rod-Wheeler หลายเดือนก่อน +11

    For we wrestle not against flesh and blood, but against principalities, against powers, against the rulers of the darkness of this world, against spiritual wickedness in high places.
    Ephesians 6:12

    • @deanodebo
      @deanodebo หลายเดือนก่อน

      That’s hard hitting and a fantastic comment. Thanks for that. Truth!

  • @browngreen933
    @browngreen933 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Wouldn't the castle granite wall storing ghost information at 5:40 be a rudimentary form of non-biological consciousness? 😮

  • @BaconMaker1
    @BaconMaker1 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    So if collective consciousness can manifest angles, demons, ghosts, UFOs, etc, then why doesn't he prove it experimentally. Let's drop the anecdotes which he relies on, and instead get some reproducible results from a peer-reviewed experiment.... oh wait, he cannot do that.

  • @supremegalacticcommander2783
    @supremegalacticcommander2783 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

    I love the people who don't question the idea of a "multiverse", something that is scientifically impossible to prove by definition, but that dismiss angels and demons without a second thought.😅

    • @deanodebo
      @deanodebo หลายเดือนก่อน

      The atheist worldview is inconsistent and arbitrary. That’s the way it is, every time

    • @vitus.verdegast
      @vitus.verdegast หลายเดือนก่อน

      The multiverse hypotheses (and there are more than one) are based on logical speculation derived from observations of our own universe. Spirits and demons are merely characters in the psychogical dramas we create about our own desires and fears. You can't equate the two. No one is clinging to "faith" in the multiverse, it's merely a scientific possibility that requires further study, unlike occult beliefs.

    • @deanodebo
      @deanodebo หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      @@vitus.verdegast you admit the multiverse theories are speculative
      Good.
      How do you know that spirits and demons are fictional?
      Actually, how do you know anything with certainty?

    • @vitus.verdegast
      @vitus.verdegast หลายเดือนก่อน

      @@deanodebo There is no abdolute certainty in science, only degrees of likelihood. It is the religious mind that demands certainty, even a false certainty based on wishful thinking rather than evidence. The evidence for a multiverse is found in the conditions in this one, which implies it is a unit in a larger array that extends beyond our horizon of direct observation. . There is no evidence that personalities exist in disembodied form, but plenty of evidence that spirits represent symbolic characters in the dramas that people create about their own desires and fears. Scientists are motivated by honest curiosity, they follow the evidence wherever it leads and are as ready to disprove a hypothesis as to prove it. The superstitious come to their conclusions first and only then search for arguments to support them, resorting to the sophistry of a lawyer or politician. Cult leaders try to wheedle their way into your mind by getting you to question reality itself, creating a false equivalence between any and all beliefs.to advance their own agendas. The burden of proof is on the one making the claim, not the skeptic. Science invites skepticism, it doesn't play mind games. The superstitious, too lazy and disorganized to employ the scientific method, only look for a fantasy that makes them feel good and then defend it against all reason.

    • @vitus.verdegast
      @vitus.verdegast หลายเดือนก่อน

      @@deanodebo We know that personality is a biological phenomenon that arises only in animals with physical nervous systems. Disembodied ghosts exist only in stories-- unless you can show us one. Conveniently for themselves, seance mediums and other charlatans always say the spirits refuse to show themselves in the presence of unbelievers.

  • @SandipChitale
    @SandipChitale หลายเดือนก่อน

    Really? for the question.

  • @alantan6786
    @alantan6786 21 วันที่ผ่านมา +1

    Run out of topics to talk about? Let’s bring up leprechauns next

  • @imperfekt7905
    @imperfekt7905 22 วันที่ผ่านมา

    Focused intention changes the physical substrate? I think there was a movie about that--The Men Who Stare at Goats.

  • @Brody.W
    @Brody.W หลายเดือนก่อน +2

    Thanks! I'd like to hear about telepathy.. Jesus Christ of Nazareth.

  • @evaadam3635
    @evaadam3635 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    Godless MATERIALISTS scream, "NO WAY!" ... but their cats and dogs say, "YES WAY!"

    • @mikel5582
      @mikel5582 หลายเดือนก่อน

      You've observed cats and dogs speaking English Eva? What language do those talking snakes speak?

    • @evaadam3635
      @evaadam3635 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      ​@@mikel5582... if you ever visit a famous haunted place, house, or building, don't forget to bring your dog or cat because they can sense better than you who do not believe in ghosts just because your senses are limited.. no need to learn their language if you have an IQ....

  • @dukeallen432
    @dukeallen432 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    No

  • @reginafefifofina
    @reginafefifofina หลายเดือนก่อน

    1:33 I thought that was the fat sugar salt capitalist trifecta of ultra processed foods.

  • @ansleyrubarb8672
    @ansleyrubarb8672 หลายเดือนก่อน

    ...Hello, just a thought. Eternity & Our Lives are just a breath apart/ a split second. It is not unusual to see/experience with us. This just reinforces the Multi-Verse concept, in which we have apart. Whether or not we personally are aware, respectfully, Chuck...captivus brevis...you tube...Blessings...

  • @stopclockapp
    @stopclockapp หลายเดือนก่อน

    Sounds like he's attempting to explain mass hallucination.

  • @zurc_bot
    @zurc_bot หลายเดือนก่อน

    order vs. chaos

    • @piehound
      @piehound หลายเดือนก่อน

      Yeah one way of describing it.

  • @tanned06
    @tanned06 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Apparently the hypothetical Jungian Collective Unconscious has been imstrimental to take over the place of a creator/creativeness of the religious figure God.

  • @samrowbotham8914
    @samrowbotham8914 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Everything happens in Consciousness or to put it in two others ways, Everything is happening in Mind at Large, It is all being dreamed by God. The Universe is an Informational entity its about making sense of the data.

  • @wallyr.7854
    @wallyr.7854 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

    Mmm 🤔. Watch the full-uncut version of the Exorcist (1973 original) and then that same evening spend an entire night “alone” in an abandoned building. The following morning report back what you experienced throughout the night, mentally, emotionally and physically. Go ahead, I dare ya 😉

    • @mikel5582
      @mikel5582 หลายเดือนก่อน

      My kid watched Godzilla and then was afraid to go to the beach because he was afraid that a giant fire-breathing lizard was going to come up from the ocean and wreak havoc. Congratulations, you've achieved the reasoning capacity of a six year old boy.

    • @wallyr.7854
      @wallyr.7854 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

      @@mikel5582 Well Geewiz, you’re quick to insult. I guess I should have expected that from a narrow minded jerk. As a man of faith, I forgive ya….but karma won’t, good luck in life 😁

    • @digitalfootballer9032
      @digitalfootballer9032 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      It's perfectly normal for a movie to evoke an emotional response. Plenty of adults get "creeped out" by things. I know of two different grown men who refuse to watch the movie "Event Horizon" because it creeps them out so much. Personally, I like that movie, but I refuse to watch any of the Saw movies or anything extremely gory. Of course I know it's fake but it is still gross 😂

    • @wallyr.7854
      @wallyr.7854 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

      @@digitalfootballer9032 Event Horizon was a great film, that sadly at the time it was underrated and misunderstood. I am glad that over time it has become a cult classic.

  • @StudentDad-mc3pu
    @StudentDad-mc3pu หลายเดือนก่อน

    No.

  • @billpope2111
    @billpope2111 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Kenneth Copeland

  • @tyvischjager9794
    @tyvischjager9794 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    The real demons are the adds

  • @djtomoy
    @djtomoy หลายเดือนก่อน

    I think angels exist but demons are a bit far fetched 🤔

  • @ericmedlock
    @ericmedlock หลายเดือนก่อน +2

    No more than Santa Claus or the tooth fairy

    • @ashm-wl4xg
      @ashm-wl4xg หลายเดือนก่อน

      Kinda like the fairytales in any “scripture”….!!
      Leap of faith”faith” into the fairytales world… is nothing more than belief in scripture…

  • @sciencefirst7880
    @sciencefirst7880 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

    This interview is not worthy of an intelligent human beings time or effort.

  • @patientson
    @patientson หลายเดือนก่อน +2

    Go into the deep forest.

  • @polarisnorth4875
    @polarisnorth4875 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

    Really?

  • @iamsincere23
    @iamsincere23 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    Yeah it's angels and demons and they are actually called humans😂

  • @playpaltalk
    @playpaltalk 13 วันที่ผ่านมา

    If you really try to get to know God and believe in him Satan will get mad at you and you will have a chance to get to know both.

  • @maxpower252
    @maxpower252 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Nah

  • @patientson
    @patientson หลายเดือนก่อน +2

    There are beings with the strangers of powers.

    • @mimetype
      @mimetype หลายเดือนก่อน

      Non-binary otherkin?

  • @11-AisexualsforGod-11
    @11-AisexualsforGod-11 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    Cloning technology could allow us to pass on hard earned angles of perspective to younger versions of our selves before passing..
    Immortality

    • @11-AisexualsforGod-11
      @11-AisexualsforGod-11 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      Artificial selection could insure perfect reincarnation from one life to the next

  • @lenspencer1765
    @lenspencer1765 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Good on ya Dean get away from dogmatic narrow minded scientists

  • @mimetype
    @mimetype หลายเดือนก่อน +7

    No. To even ask that in the year 2024 requires a massive lack of maturity.

    • @ManiBalajiC
      @ManiBalajiC หลายเดือนก่อน

      the fun should be in , in this universe : no, what if in multiverse : might be , in infinite universe : YES.

    • @t.j.payeur5331
      @t.j.payeur5331 หลายเดือนก่อน +6

      For you to even say such a thing shows a massive arrogance of assuredness that your intellect can perceive exactly how the Universe Is. Don't be afraid....

    • @browngreen933
      @browngreen933 หลายเดือนก่อน +3

      Existence has more tricks up its sleeve than we know. 😂

    • @markb3786
      @markb3786 หลายเดือนก่อน

      @@t.j.payeur5331 I think he is basing his statement on the complete lack of evidence.

    • @digitalfootballer9032
      @digitalfootballer9032 หลายเดือนก่อน

      ​@@t.j.payeur5331Typically it's the low IQ people that fein intelligence to a degree of arrogance. Genuinely intelligent people don't have a need to do as such. I may not be a hard believer in the supernatural, but I am always open to intelligent discussion on the topic. There is definitely things going on we can't explain. Claims of the supernatural were the answer to the unexplained traditionally (a "god of the gaps", if you will). What is most intriguing is that whatever force may actually be causing these strange phenomena may very well prove someday to have a scientific answer, but may also be more strange than anything supernatural we could concoct.

  • @Obeijin
    @Obeijin หลายเดือนก่อน

    Sheeples ...

  • @jeremy2958
    @jeremy2958 หลายเดือนก่อน +4

    Make sure you use a bidet or wipe thoroughly, otherwise you might get some Bibi Netanyahu on your boxers

  • @Bill..N
    @Bill..N หลายเดือนก่อน +3

    Dean is obviously brilliant and entertaining to listen to.. It is my opinion only that somewhere along the line, the good Doctor has EXITED the arena of science.. His current ideas sound more like the rough draft of a would-be fantasy novel than credible scientific research.. Immaterial projections, by definition, are not possible to test for, and when someone dies in an old house, information doesn't leak out of them to get STORED the walls.. Wow..

    • @Archeidos-Arcana
      @Archeidos-Arcana หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      What if there is a method for testing these kinds of claims that has not yet been formulated? The empirical sciences didn't come into fruition until we built the cognitive-conceptual structures capable of creating the current scientific method.

    • @Bill..N
      @Bill..N หลายเดือนก่อน +2

      Thanks for your reply friend.. In my humble opinion, one could ignore the current insights of physics and suggest that SOMEDAY the supernatural may become vulnerable to the scientific method of information analysis, BUT in order to become a CREDIBLE theory there MUST be some measure of credible evidence to support it.. No?

    • @Bill..N
      @Bill..N หลายเดือนก่อน

      Even mathmatical support would count as the first layer of credibility..

    • @johnz8843
      @johnz8843 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      ​@Archeidos-Arcana That's certainly possible what you suggest. But it does make the hypothesis invulnerable to criticism. "It exists but we haven't developed the constructs needed to study it." Of course that doesn't mean it can't exist but you can nearly say that about anything.

    • @Archeidos-Arcana
      @Archeidos-Arcana หลายเดือนก่อน

      @@Bill..N I don't think what I'm arguing for ignores physics at all. Physics is inherently intertwined with philosophy, because physics like all science; is ultimately interpreted through our logico-conceptual structures. My challenge is not to physics; it is to a philosophical components within the common interpretation of physics.

  • @evaadam3635
    @evaadam3635 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    "Do Angels and Demons Exist?"
    Whether Angels or Demons exist, it is not for us to know the truth but TO BELIEVE. I believe it is Heaven that exists where angels dwell whom many had fallen to end in hell and who are now being labelled as demons, devils, lost souls, etc.,
    .. hell is just a state of NOTHINGNESS where fallen angels ended up surrounded with cold dark EMPTINESS - an absence of God's grace...
    Please read the following light to understand why BELIEF is important :
    We left the truth about Heaven a long time ago in favor of a lie that ended us all in a state of cold dark emptiness (hell), and now we are totally lost not anymore knowing the truth...
    This was how this happened : We all were once in Heaven (our Original Home) with our loving God as the whole truth and nothing but the truth... but then we started "BELIEVING WITHOUT KNOWING" that we can be as powerful as God if we can find the knowledge that God forbids..
    ..we left Heaven to search for this forbidden knowledge despite God's plea and warning that there is only EMPTINESS and SUFFERING beyond Heaven...We ended in a state of cold dark emptiness instead, as God had warned. We created our own hell, only our free souls to blame because we lost faith in God's love....
    .. then we asked God to give us a chance to return Home, this is why we are in this temporary reality on this physical world for a chance to return Home through regaining our faith in a loving God so to override our prior bad choice of losing faith...If we fail, our prior bad choice will remain in effect and our lost souls will return to hell because God always respects our free choice.
    ...in other words, we are all demons who were once angels dwelling in Heavem..
    .. and, by the way, If we were able to freely choose to "BELIEVE WITHOUT KNOWING" while we were in Heaven that ended our souls in hell, we are also able to believe without knowing God, here on earth so for us to return Home. It is just a matter of choice because your soul is free - the same freedom you applied when you left God in Heaven for greed..
    ...for Godless people who continue to scream that they can never believe without knowing, you already did that when you were in Heaven, that was why your souls ended in hell and now on earth for a chance of salvation through believing without knowing...
    ..so, asking for the truth and nothing but the truth, that you abandoned a long time ago, IS JUST FUTILE. Your lost soul was sent here NOT to Know but "TO BELIEVE without Knowing" to return Home, the same way your soul ended in hell by believing without knowing...
    If you can not get the point that I just shared, you may need an exorcist to drive away the thing that is fogging up your good senses.

    • @davenchop
      @davenchop หลายเดือนก่อน

      and i believe you are an simpleton ignoranus

  • @asyetundetermined
    @asyetundetermined หลายเดือนก่อน +2

    The woo-woo episodes of CTT are truly the worst.

  • @edwardtutman196
    @edwardtutman196 หลายเดือนก่อน

    A saw a ghost of Einstein once, and he called it "A very spooky action at a distance".

  • @PhillipYewTree
    @PhillipYewTree หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    Why can’t we just accept that some people have a vivid imagination.

  • @ansleyrubarb8672
    @ansleyrubarb8672 หลายเดือนก่อน

    ...may I offer one other thought. Sorry a few thoughts. We are born knowledge empty, yet we seem to some other Eternal connection. Amazed at how we grow, learn, heal, &develope. There is so much more we must learn. Also, after many hours of research, learning, growing, there is also Revelational Knowledge. Both in the sciences, and also almost anything we are practicing, passionate, & studying. The, Ah-ha moment, and a whole new refreshed understanding, respectfully, Chuck...captivus brevis...Blessings...

  • @11-AisexualsforGod-11
    @11-AisexualsforGod-11 หลายเดือนก่อน

    "Angels" are eternal angles of perspective as far as I understand..
    Algorithims which ai can save before we pass on preserving our progress

  • @cujimmy1366
    @cujimmy1366 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    A dissociation of self.

  • @MJ1
    @MJ1 หลายเดือนก่อน +6

    Oh please. You are not a serious person to ask these questions. Go see a doctor.

  • @gregbrown5020
    @gregbrown5020 20 วันที่ผ่านมา

    No, angels&demons are not real. Thus the name, lol

  • @markb3786
    @markb3786 หลายเดือนก่อน +4

    Dean Radin - Do Santa Claus and the Easter Bunny Exist? Closer to Running Out of Topics Than Closer To Truth

    • @johnz8843
      @johnz8843 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      Read the book, Ghosthunter by Deborah Blum. Some top flight intellectuals, Charles Wallace, Henry Sidgwick, William James have pursued these issues. Not with success though and not for Santa Claus..

    • @digitalfootballer9032
      @digitalfootballer9032 หลายเดือนก่อน

      Dumb comment.

    • @digitalfootballer9032
      @digitalfootballer9032 หลายเดือนก่อน

      I just had a tea party with Bigfoot, the Tooth Fairy, and The Great Pumpkin in a black helicopter 😂

  • @mohdnorzaihar2632
    @mohdnorzaihar2632 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Get to know your "bad desire@nafsu" because it's the most real thing we've been experiencing. The Quran, bible, torah repeatedly mention it. Peace be upon us all

  • @jerryfoust3860
    @jerryfoust3860 หลายเดือนก่อน

    So, Dean buys into Freud.

  • @MasterofOne-zl6ur
    @MasterofOne-zl6ur หลายเดือนก่อน +2

    No. There are no spirits, no souls, no Gods, no consciousness, no after life all are empty all are invisible all represent survival of biological life. Soul, spirit, consciousness, God the after life are postulations of survival soul or spirit within the structure, like wise consciousness ,God representing the immortal soul or spirit of survival the after life representing survival extension or continuation in death and soul is required. However they all have one thing in common which survival does not which is I can see and measure survival within biological life where soul, spirit, consciousness, God the after life cannot be seen or measured and there is no correlation with material substance which can be observed but in survival it can bee clearly seen to be true and real. The others are empty, fallacious, postulations of survival, invisible, incoherent, and are circular in linguistics terms or you can never know the answer with proof. Soul ,spirit, consciousness, God the after life all share this same problem or issue so the language is false or incorrect. Survival has the advantage which is it can be seen, measured, and it also is a force of nature or within biological life for it to be seen it needs the material to exist because life has a survival disposition which is inherent. There is no confusion. Individuals create the problems for others or other material objects.
    Survival is the answer .Soul or spirit or consciousness are Religious terms like God or the after life .Do not be fooled. All are empty ,invisible, hollow, lack correlation with material in definition or no physical match in behaviour, all are survival oriented, all cannot be seen, cannot be measured, have no linguistical match with physical, are from 500 Years ago, lack historical postulations of the after life with earlier biological life 'Behaviour' or 'Availability 'of after life, humans evolved later in time scales so would be later additions to the after life [eternal], Survival and behaviour problem with availability of after life based on historical bio life's ability to survive measured against survival, hence the need to discredit evolution and survival itself while postulating survival, Dinosouls and biosouls would already be waiting for you unless they don't have souls for some reason. Now why would that be considering they were here millions of years before humans existed and the after life is eternal? When did souls first arise when humans existed or was it in earlier biological life forms because we evolved from these others, is this why we find the Religious discrediting Evolution because it holds clues to reality like survival of species and survival itself can explain long held linguistical errors like soul, spirit of dinosouls, Gods, consciousness, and the after life.? Why do all these postulations have different terminology and why are they all referring to survival be that be in death, from within soul or spirit, or now the religious trick of consciousness. These are all survival postulations in evolution.

    • @digitalfootballer9032
      @digitalfootballer9032 หลายเดือนก่อน +3

      You may not believe in God, but you sure believe in run-on sentences 😂

    • @MasterofOne-zl6ur
      @MasterofOne-zl6ur หลายเดือนก่อน

      @@digitalfootballer9032 This is good.

  • @rizwanrafeek3811
    @rizwanrafeek3811 หลายเดือนก่อน

    In the broad daylight, people captured in the video, chairs moving own on their own.
    I have seen, video where chairs thrown away in the air, men don't have a such physicals power to throw a chair up in the air to such a heights.

    • @markb3786
      @markb3786 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      Every single one of these videos is fake. Every single one.

  • @JJoeisCooking
    @JJoeisCooking หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    Nonsense.

  • @wthomas5697
    @wthomas5697 หลายเดือนก่อน +6

    Clearly this channel is running out of stuff to talk about.

  • @Mathilda668
    @Mathilda668 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Great video, If you are not currently active in the financial market, you are making a huge mistake. I understand it could be due to ignorance, but if you want to build generational wealth and promote financial literacy, you need to be in the market.

  • @sebek12345
    @sebek12345 หลายเดือนก่อน +3

    Now were just getting silly. Come on now - did you run out of actual “experts” to interview??

  • @oposkainaxei
    @oposkainaxei หลายเดือนก่อน +3

    This is not a serious question. I’m not gonna spend my valuable time on this. Thumb down.

  • @Promatheos
    @Promatheos หลายเดือนก่อน +23

    Nope, they dont. Next question?

    • @galaxy5am987
      @galaxy5am987 หลายเดือนก่อน +12

      What are the qualifications that allow you to come to such a conclusion, or is it just your opinion.

    • @wordzfailmebro
      @wordzfailmebro หลายเดือนก่อน

      👽👍

    • @MrWhatever1234567
      @MrWhatever1234567 หลายเดือนก่อน

      @@wordzfailmebrocookie. Hi I’m gay and I “like cooky Kooky. I’m cooky monster and I like penis” get me out of here!!!

    • @user-ei8ye8yn7p
      @user-ei8ye8yn7p หลายเดือนก่อน +2

      Are you 100% sure? Really?How?

    • @jacywilson
      @jacywilson หลายเดือนก่อน +2

      ​@@galaxy5am987maybe he is one of them...

  • @targetedplantsguy9481
    @targetedplantsguy9481 หลายเดือนก่อน +3

    Nope and if you say yes please don't vote or be part of modern society.

    • @digitalfootballer9032
      @digitalfootballer9032 หลายเดือนก่อน

      I bet you voted for the corpse in office right now. So did a lot of other corpses 😂

  • @user-gk9lg5sp4y
    @user-gk9lg5sp4y หลายเดือนก่อน

    Not only no, but he🏒🏒 no

  • @vincentzevecke4578
    @vincentzevecke4578 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Jung speak about shadow.self