Transcendental Idealism and Knowledge | Immanuel Kant #1

แชร์
ฝัง
  • เผยแพร่เมื่อ 16 ต.ค. 2024

ความคิดเห็น • 26

  • @Blaze.776
    @Blaze.776 10 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

    Thank youuuu, this is the only video that explains this type of idealism very well ❤❤❤

  • @HegemonicMarxism
    @HegemonicMarxism ปีที่แล้ว +1

    good video, concise and precise.

  • @yashika5574
    @yashika5574 10 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    Wonderfully explained , thankyou for this !!!

  • @75spinoza
    @75spinoza 8 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    Well explained. Clear and concise.

  • @tallatrasool9757
    @tallatrasool9757 2 ปีที่แล้ว +4

    you were doing very well, I found all my understanding through this video,, please keep making videos on philosophy basics,, kindly don't skip it,,, please keep it up...

  • @ozachar
    @ozachar ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Excellent! I have listened to many philosophy presentations. Your method of giving examples, not just general statements, is better clarifying than almost anything else that I have found.

  • @nadooor2007
    @nadooor2007 2 ปีที่แล้ว +2

    Amazing video and presentation. Best video in TH-cam in this regard.

  • @tcl5853
    @tcl5853 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Outstanding! Thanks!

  • @asadalionly9293
    @asadalionly9293 4 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    Well Explained!!!!!!🎉 Keep it up. Please make complete series on western philosophy.

  • @hmmmmmmmmmmm27
    @hmmmmmmmmmmm27 2 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Thank youuuuu! This video is really helpful. It made me understand easier🥰 Brief but intact

  • @matejasuban2393
    @matejasuban2393 3 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    you presented this well, great work mate :)

  • @zaheerabbas404
    @zaheerabbas404 2 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Very informative

  • @kennylong7281
    @kennylong7281 2 ปีที่แล้ว +2

    Over the centuries, Science has given us valuable tools which grandly enhance our senses. The list is too long to mention. So all knowledge obtained by using these tools of sensory extension, is as valid as any information obtained by normal senses, such as hearing, smelling, or seeing.

    • @keithperkins9871
      @keithperkins9871 2 ปีที่แล้ว

      right but its impossible to draw a complete distinction between these two since scientific knowledge still only exists insofar as a human is perceiving it, it is still greatly interpretational even if there is no disagreement

  • @bellapcm
    @bellapcm 2 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    I love this class, thank you! 💕

  • @imiikhan
    @imiikhan ปีที่แล้ว

    🖤🖤🖤

  • @nonamehere-y2t
    @nonamehere-y2t 5 หลายเดือนก่อน

    A priori is self evident knowledge. It literally means "from what is earlier". As the sun aways sets we can expect this as a continued truth from knowing from earlier. I see how you summarize and I feel if anyone shouldn't be translated by another for others it would be him and Hegel to leave be for the teachers. Sorry to say, but I think you will confuse people.

  • @nonamehere-y2t
    @nonamehere-y2t 5 หลายเดือนก่อน

    That is NOT a picture of Immanuel Kant and everyone would appreciate it all people who want to enlighten another or educate the public about ANY topic to first know and display only facts. So, the picture you have displayed is Friedrich Heinrich Jacobi. He was a CRITIC of Immanuel Kant. For Goodness sake, do things you know.

  • @lilianhaiucki291
    @lilianhaiucki291 3 ปีที่แล้ว +4

    I Kant believe this philosopher was so smart

    • @Impaled_Onion-thatsmine
      @Impaled_Onion-thatsmine 3 ปีที่แล้ว

      It just came out before it was transcdental aesthetic and he goes back like 800 years, they wanna Make it a movie.

  • @benquinneyiii7941
    @benquinneyiii7941 ปีที่แล้ว

    Synthesis

  • @ralphricart3177
    @ralphricart3177 2 ปีที่แล้ว

    Stars are not massive nor are they light years away.