Whenever big tech profits don’t constantly increase, they make it sound as if these companies go bankrupt. They milk customers for more and more money(like moving from owned property/goods to no ownership and continuously paying for subscriptions to temporarily own your device) - there is a limit to what people can afford.
@@thedude5040 MS Office is a perfect example of what he is talking about. Little to no innovations for decades but its more expensive now then it used to be.
Whoever thought it was a good idea to add background music - nope, it wasn't. I was close to stop watching a few times because the music made it way too hard to understand anything. Background music is fine if nobody is speaking, but when somebody is speaking, I want to hear what they say, not some background music! 😞
"Potent and powerful brands" indeed. But then, so were K-Mart and Sears. Big Tech's real problem is that only a fraction of its production is essential. Gaming, cellphones, wi-fi among many services are largely used for frivolous purposes. And all of them are susceptible to being replaced by new technology, just as AT&T's landlines were. In other words, not all of tech is equally valuable. Yet Big Tech profits depend on those ancillary services that frankly aren't necessary and often don't work as well as what they replaced. Yes, Google and TH-cam are nice to have, but people communicated quite well without them not that long ago. And high-handed corporate policies have not exactly endeared Big Tech to the masses.
It's hard to see how these companies fail to know about something called stagnation. There's always a saturation point for everything and these companies just think they can grow forever.
“What’s the use case for AI?” The answer is that no business or field will remain untouched. It’s like asking about the use case for industrialization in 1800. If you’d like a tidy summary, you could try putting this question to ChatGPT.
Honestly love it. if youre doing an assignment for uni, you can give it a link and tell it to reference it for you in havard style. or summarise something into a conclusion. Its not copying since its your own work being summarised
Don't get me wrong, I know the economy is in shambles and in order to break even and make profit, we have to ride it out until stock recovery, but how are some folks in the same stock market as me still able to pull off substantial profits of as much as 650K within months, what am I doing wrong?
@Clara Lynn Exactly why i enjoy my day to day market decisions being guided by a portfolio-coach, seeing that their entire skillset is built around going long and short at the same time both employing risk for its asymmetrical upside and laying off risk as a hedge against the inevitable downward turns, coupled with the exclusive information/analysis they have, it's near impossible to not outperform, been using a portfolio-coach for over 2years+ and I've netted over $800k
In the high-tech war, the United States is dealing with China in the same way it dealt with Japanese chips 30 years ago. It has added a cloak of freedom and democracy this time, but in essence it is for US's economic hegemony.
Lessons from Toshiba, Alstom: how US suppresses foreign rival companies to maintain tech hegemony Toshiba: 'national security threat' Japan's semiconductor industry was in full bloom in the 1980s with government support before it was ground down by the US. It had surpassed the US as the world's largest chip supplier, and its market share of DRAM (dynamic random access memory) products reached some 80 percent in 1987, according to a Los Angeles Times article in August 1992. Toshiba, Japan's leading chip producer at that time, was then targeted by the US over "national security concerns." After Toshiba and Norwegian military enterprise Kongsberg Våpenfabrikk, were found in 1986 to be secretly selling sophisticated milling machines to the Soviet Union, Washington issued a 2 to 5 year ban on all Toshiba Corporation products , saying the sale to the Soviet Union had posed a threat to US national security, and Toshiba had violated a Coordinating Committee for Multilateral Export Controls (CoCom) agreement, which prohibited members from exporting advanced weapons or machines to the Soviet Union. Toshiba was reportedly severely hit by the scandal. Two of its managers were sent to jail and several senior executives resigned. The company spent some 100 million yen ($0.95 million) on advertising in almost all major US newspapers apologizing for its actions. The scandal ended up hurting its reputation and prestige it had established globally. Its many technical documents were also allegedly seized during a CIA investigation.
In fact, the best way to deal with the high-tech war is to slow down the technology iteration cycle. Many high-tech applications in this world are actually of little practical significance. For example, what is called 5g now is not as much effective as 4g. Another example 5nm chips, have no special meaning for non-mobile products. If you keep following the high-tech iterations of the United States, then you will never be able to achieve your own high-tech industry.
"in the same way it dealt with Japanese chips 30 years ago" Huh? This is not your grandma's war. This is Ukraine. This is CCCp vs USA. This is direct action.
@@OakleyMoodie Pay attention to the title of the video, it's not the Ukraine you're talking about every day. There are endless videos on ukraine topics elsewhere, why do not u go there and have your political show over there?
Mind Begs the Question: Pegasus - Hacks into iOS,Android Apple,Google - design iOS,Android Apple,Google - if leave door open,don't fix Apple,Google - not responsible,culpable?
China doesn't want to give foreign companies market access but wants foreign access for their companies. All foreign apps and website are required by China to be hosted on Chinese hosting companies.
Mind Begs the Question: Pegasus - Hacks into iOS,Android Apple,Google - design iOS,Android Apple,Google - if leave door open,don't fix Apple,Google - not responsible,culpable?
And they steal like crazy. They steal all sorts of tech, IP, even stealth military tech. Look at their new jet; it's literally a mix of other countries' stolen/spied research.
China does NOT restrict anyone to participate in its market provided they follow local laws. Facebook and Google CHOSE to leave the market for that reason and were banned due to refusal to follow locals laws. They were not faring well at the time anyway. Amazon, Apple, eBay, Microsoft and many others chose to stay.
@@n.c9653 Try publishing website or app in China from outside China. It doesn't show on search engines as well as app stores. Even if you want to export any finished goods it is blocked at customs citing low quality I don't need to remind you what Chinese goods are famous for.
@@wololocute well, not sure what you are trying to sell but perhaps you should stop blaming the system for your own deficiencies? Plenty of 'foreign' goods and services and apps and whatever else are doing well in China.
Meta will be gone, Amazon is overvalued with its hign PE ratio. Applied AI will be the biggest opportunity, next to renewables which are subsidized and enforced by governments. $TSLA
Great and informative content, and nice music. Could you please skip the music? I didn't manage to watch the video through, it was too annoying with music. Some parts the music was so loud that I struggled to hear the voice.
I'd categorise that: Big tech is fine, as long as their core business works - Amazon prints money in their core business, they've lost 10B though in their Alexa/Audio department with products that sell well, but are tough to monetise after you've put them in your house. So for Amazon it's a tiny bump in the road, nothing to worry about. Same with Microsoft and several others mentioned here. Those got in trouble though, that basically subsidise their service heavily - Uber was extraordinarily cheap when it launched, now they are close to the price of a taxi, so people are moving to competitors. It's also a question of strategy: Apple is a maximum profit company, others emphasise user growth over profit.
China has already started to tighten the rules before Jack Ma made the speech. The timing was close but not because of his disrespect that the Chinese gov't acted but rather because the tech companies need to be monitored with regulations to ensure the safety of the investment.
@@sablefilms if you did your research, then you would have known exactly what happened. less than a week from what jack ma said, ant's IPO got blocked? it was suppose to go through and got full government support prior to his remarks. brainwashed shill
@@sablefilms use your brain for once if you have any brain cells left. it might make your life a little easier. but i do feel bad for you since you have none
US economy is tie to what the federal bank does. If the Fed reduces interest to almost zero; is free money for plutocrats and investors. They use zero percent Interest and QE to buy stocks and increase the value of the companies, but we all know that quantitative easy creates inflation. The Fed is fighting inflation by stopping the flow of free money for the rich in order to stop inflation. All you have to do is look at what the Fed is doing to predict the economic future. QE and low interest and market and value of companies go up. Quantitative tightening and high interest and is time to sell and markets go down and the value of companies goes down as well.
Low interest rates keep too low for too long making big bubbles. Now these companies must service more debt with rising interest rates. Many small business and startups, heavily debt weighed, are servicing more debt with less available for innovation/growth. More bankruptcies.
background music and some visual effects are annoying than helpful for the content it's like a serious well-made documentary ruined by bombardment with hans zimmerish blockbuster orchestra i got your concept of style for thi series but it's too much
As long as you just keep talking about what Wall St and D.C. are doing to consumers to protect profits, especially inflation right now, instead of the consumers themselves and what they need, you're just wasting time and helping to facilitate the collapse of capitalism. Not that it can be stopped at this point. Winter is coming.
Mind Begs the Question: Pegasus - Hacks into iOS,Android Apple,Google - design iOS,Android Apple,Google - if leave door open,don't fix Apple,Google - not responsible,criminal?
Okay? Company buy back their own stocks for more voting power, dividends, and as savings. Buy low sell high. They may do more buy backs if they have the free cash
ASML, Adyen, Booking Holdings. Just 3 big tech companies from the Netherlands. Really surprised ASML isnt mentioned since without them there is no "big tech".
Alstom: the 'bribery case' When a copy of The American Trap was spotted on the desk of Huawei founder Ren Zhengfei during a video interview in 2019, the book about the US takeover of French power company Alstom caught the attention of Chinese netizens. Hailed as "a French industrial jewel," Alstom had been a global leader in various power and transportation fields. It had built power generation stations and transmission lines and railways. Washington began targeting Alstom as it became a formidable competitor of US giant General Electric (GE) in many countries and regions in the early 2010s. In 2013, Frédéric Pierucci, Alstom's executive and co-author of The American Trap, was arrested by police at a New York airport for "authorizing bribes to Indonesian officials" to secure a contract. Pierucci wrote in his book that his lawyer had been offered a plea bargain: admit his guilt and be free within months or "risk up to 125 years in jail," the BBC reported in April 2019.
saying AI is going to be next thing is like people in 16 hundreds saying "this science thing is gonna be big". Yeah, sure, but like what exactly is gonna look like? If you are to ask me, which you didn't, and probably shouldn't anyway, the next big thing is gonna be in material science, which is gonna unlock a richer real life experience. Yes, it's not gonna be something digital. In few words that don't paint the picture well enough, I think 3d printing is gonna be the next big thing, but not like we have it right now. Right now 3d printing is still not accessible and not good enough. I'm envisioning a 3d printing method out of a material that: - can be almost infinitely recyclable - requires way less time to be molded in the right shape, say minutes - easily supports joints - can be reprogrammed from the outside, at least in certain environments, say homes. Imagine what Magneto was doing in X-men, but without the power of the mind and probably less evil.
So, basicaly is the market maturing, from a growth basis to a more sustainable business model that is not dependent in very risky investments to stay afloat in the enironment of easy money with low interest rates that the main global currencies have been experiencung
The real reason it that stocks can't grow forever. We having to go to the Earth. People buy stocks because they them to rise and eventually they selling off if they see stock declining. Don't have much with companies core business.
0:00 - 11:45 - 11:59 💯 0:00 - 11:45 - 13:04 - 13:16 Stronger Together 💯💯💯💯 0:00 - 11:45 - 13:04 - 13:52 🇪🇺🇩🇪Stronger Together💯💯💯💯💯 0:00 - 13:57 “that markets work better”… that’s still a little too vague and promiscuous imo, but okay 🙃🙂I think 🤔 0:00 - 11:45 - 14:23 of course, in the long run it could equally lead to unprecedented growth if Big Tech steps up to evolve with democratic values due to the guardrails/regulations/legislation that forced evolution of such as but not limited to: American Big Tech that the likes of China obviously doesn’t appear to be following democratic values, human rights, etc in a way that comes even adequately close to fitting democratic values instead of dictatorial/autocratic/authoritarian/etc systems that evidently continue to pose a none insignificant risk/temptations of evolving further in these ways, consequentially a seemingly constant temptation of diverging increasingly away from more democratic values for capitalistic focuses instead of an adequate/etc prioritization of democracy over profits. Effectively serving as a none insignificant risk of fanning the flames of perhaps democratic backsliding, etc .. in a none insignificant portion of cases/etc it feels. It’s never been about making Big Tech smaller or bigger… it’s just about incentivizing Big Tech to take on the challenges of evolving in a way that doesn’t rapidly converge towards authoritarian/autocracy in a way that has a none insignificant risk of reaching towards points of no return of such as but not limited to democratic backsliding, etc 0:00 - 11:46 - 14:48 well said❤️❤️❤️Stronger Together💯💯💯💯 0:00 - 14:48 - 16:32 - 16:55 - 17:48 not really, it just forces an evolution that includes prioritizations of the societies they are released in, not just such as but not limited to profits. It’s not about destroying big tech it’s about protecting the evolution of big tech in a way that encourages built in precautions of risks of i.e. democratic backsliding for cheap gains that may lead past the points of no return if say a Blip in Modern American history by electing a wannabe dictatorial/authoritarian/autocratic leader such as a Trump and his enabled/empowered extremists teams/followers flirting with effectively authoritarian/autocratic/dictatorial ambitions/tendencies 0:00 - 14:48 - 18:46 14:48 - 18:56 - 19:24 - 19:36 just facts💯💯 Thank you for spending the time to create and share this content awareness/perspective🖤❤️💛🙏🏾🇩🇪🇪🇺Etc STRONGEST TOGETHER🇺🇸❤️🤍💙💯💯💯💯💯
Item# 452 100mm P B 0-100 500um SSP Test In Stock 2526 $35.22 $27.06 $20.26 $13.46 $12.91 $12.09 100mm Silicon Wafer Used for sensor fabrication, spin coating, microfluidics research and Will be used as carrier wafers for etching quantum computing field R&D and more! Best seller!
As far as I'm concerned, M1cr0s0ft, Google and others like Facecrap can all disappear, good riddance. All things that hould be replaced by open source and or peer to peer solutions as much as possible. Things like that.
*At least, the US has big tech companies, unlike every country in Europe, which does not have any big tech companies. It's been almost 50 years of the software and the Internet industry. The un-skiled and inefficient Europe can only dream of having a big tech company.*
While some worry that Musk will turn Twitter into a free speech hellscape, others have lauded the Tesla founder for attempting to reduce the platform’s systemic Left-leaning bias. But the question remains: should we be troubled or encouraged by the concentration of all this power in one man’s hands? Unherd Magazine Online
Whenever big tech profits don’t constantly increase, they make it sound as if these companies go bankrupt. They milk customers for more and more money(like moving from owned property/goods to no ownership and continuously paying for subscriptions to temporarily own your device) - there is a limit to what people can afford.
You pay money for facebook, twitter, and google?
@@thedude5040
MS Office is a perfect example of what he is talking about. Little to no innovations for decades but its more expensive now then it used to be.
@@jeffreyschnedar8020 neat. Then use google docs or corel word perfect. You also dont spend nearly as much on new computers or as frequently.
Whoever thought it was a good idea to add background music - nope, it wasn't. I was close to stop watching a few times because the music made it way too hard to understand anything.
Background music is fine if nobody is speaking, but when somebody is speaking, I want to hear what they say, not some background music! 😞
"Potent and powerful brands" indeed. But then, so were K-Mart and Sears. Big Tech's real problem is that only a fraction of its production is essential. Gaming, cellphones, wi-fi among many services are largely used for frivolous purposes. And all of them are susceptible to being replaced by new technology, just as AT&T's landlines were. In other words, not all of tech is equally valuable. Yet Big Tech profits depend on those ancillary services that frankly aren't necessary and often don't work as well as what they replaced. Yes, Google and TH-cam are nice to have, but people communicated quite well without them not that long ago. And high-handed corporate policies have not exactly endeared Big Tech to the masses.
there is a line between success and greed.
It's hard to see how these companies fail to know about something called stagnation. There's always a saturation point for everything and these companies just think they can grow forever.
Company is NOT=stock ☝️
Good show but I couldn't stand that background "music".
Same. It's super distracting.
The next big thing is too ambiguous to contemplate. There may not be a "next big thing" for the consumer, but what about in science or industry?
Photonic computing. Light based information processing instead of based on current passing or not on a very small semi-conductor to make logic gates.
“What’s the use case for AI?” The answer is that no business or field will remain untouched. It’s like asking about the use case for industrialization in 1800. If you’d like a tidy summary, you could try putting this question to ChatGPT.
Honestly love it. if youre doing an assignment for uni, you can give it a link and tell it to reference it for you in havard style. or summarise something into a conclusion. Its not copying since its your own work being summarised
DW thank you very much, this was very interesting
Don't get me wrong, I know the economy is in shambles and in order to break even and make profit, we have to ride it out until stock recovery, but how are some folks in the same stock market as me still able to pull off substantial profits of as much as 650K within months, what am I doing wrong?
@Clara Lynn Exactly why i enjoy my day to day market decisions being guided by a portfolio-coach, seeing that their entire skillset is built around going long and short at the same time both employing risk for its asymmetrical upside and laying off risk as a hedge against the inevitable downward turns, coupled with the exclusive information/analysis they have, it's near impossible to not outperform, been using a portfolio-coach for over 2years+ and I've netted over $800k
@@2024Red-j5t Mind if I ask you to recommend this particular coach you using their service?
@@Steyne968 CASEY ALLEN GRAY is the coach that guides me, you probably might've come across her before, she's quite known in her field, look-her up.
In the high-tech war, the United States is dealing with China in the same way it dealt with Japanese chips 30 years ago. It has added a cloak of freedom and democracy this time, but in essence it is for US's economic hegemony.
Lessons from Toshiba, Alstom: how US suppresses foreign rival companies to maintain tech hegemony
Toshiba: 'national security threat'
Japan's semiconductor industry was in full bloom in the 1980s with government support before it was ground down by the US. It had surpassed the US as the world's largest chip supplier, and its market share of DRAM (dynamic random access memory) products reached some 80 percent in 1987, according to a Los Angeles Times article in August 1992.
Toshiba, Japan's leading chip producer at that time, was then targeted by the US over "national security concerns." After Toshiba and Norwegian military enterprise Kongsberg Våpenfabrikk, were found in 1986 to be secretly selling sophisticated milling machines to the Soviet Union, Washington issued a 2 to 5 year ban on all Toshiba Corporation products , saying the sale to the Soviet Union had posed a threat to US national security, and Toshiba had violated a Coordinating Committee for Multilateral Export Controls (CoCom) agreement, which prohibited members from exporting advanced weapons or machines to the Soviet Union.
Toshiba was reportedly severely hit by the scandal. Two of its managers were sent to jail and several senior executives resigned. The company spent some 100 million yen ($0.95 million) on advertising in almost all major US newspapers apologizing for its actions. The scandal ended up hurting its reputation and prestige it had established globally. Its many technical documents were also allegedly seized during a CIA investigation.
@@happymelon7129 and
your point?
In fact, the best way to deal with the high-tech war is to slow down the technology iteration cycle. Many high-tech applications in this world are actually of little practical significance. For example, what is called 5g now is not as much effective as 4g. Another example 5nm chips, have no special meaning for non-mobile products.
If you keep following the high-tech iterations of the United States, then you will never be able to achieve your own high-tech industry.
"in the same way it dealt with Japanese chips 30 years ago"
Huh? This is not your grandma's war. This is Ukraine. This is CCCp vs USA. This is direct action.
@@OakleyMoodie Pay attention to the title of the video, it's not the Ukraine you're talking about every day.
There are endless videos on ukraine topics elsewhere, why do not u go there and have your political show over there?
This cyberpunk backgroud music on DW videos haha love it, very modern
Mind Begs the Question:
Pegasus - Hacks into iOS,Android
Apple,Google - design iOS,Android
Apple,Google - if leave door open,don't fix
Apple,Google - not responsible,culpable?
China doesn't want to give foreign companies market access but wants foreign access for their companies. All foreign apps and website are required by China to be hosted on Chinese hosting companies.
Mind Begs the Question:
Pegasus - Hacks into iOS,Android
Apple,Google - design iOS,Android
Apple,Google - if leave door open,don't fix
Apple,Google - not responsible,culpable?
And they steal like crazy. They steal all sorts of tech, IP, even stealth military tech. Look at their new jet; it's literally a mix of other countries' stolen/spied research.
China does NOT restrict anyone to participate in its market provided they follow local laws. Facebook and Google CHOSE to leave the market for that reason and were banned due to refusal to follow locals laws. They were not faring well at the time anyway. Amazon, Apple, eBay, Microsoft and many others chose to stay.
@@n.c9653 Try publishing website or app in China from outside China. It doesn't show on search engines as well as app stores. Even if you want to export any finished goods it is blocked at customs citing low quality I don't need to remind you what Chinese goods are famous for.
@@wololocute well, not sure what you are trying to sell but perhaps you should stop blaming the system for your own deficiencies? Plenty of 'foreign' goods and services and apps and whatever else are doing well in China.
👏 always high quality documentary, DW. This is the new era of Tech!
very well presented indeed!
bien = well
Market capitalization is NOT= value of a company! Trillions of dollars wiped out? That money was never there entirely!
00:17 Good stuff, keep it up! 🎵🔥
Meta will be gone, Amazon is overvalued with its hign PE ratio. Applied AI will be the biggest opportunity, next to renewables which are subsidized and enforced by governments. $TSLA
Very informative, thanks DW!
Superb expose !! Thank you so much.
Tech is hit...
Smaller techs are gone.
Not a good sign for any nation.
Very interesting and well presented.
Great and informative content, and nice music. Could you please skip the music? I didn't manage to watch the video through, it was too annoying with music. Some parts the music was so loud that I struggled to hear the voice.
I'd categorise that: Big tech is fine, as long as their core business works - Amazon prints money in their core business, they've lost 10B though in their Alexa/Audio department with products that sell well, but are tough to monetise after you've put them in your house. So for Amazon it's a tiny bump in the road, nothing to worry about. Same with Microsoft and several others mentioned here. Those got in trouble though, that basically subsidise their service heavily - Uber was extraordinarily cheap when it launched, now they are close to the price of a taxi, so people are moving to competitors. It's also a question of strategy: Apple is a maximum profit company, others emphasise user growth over profit.
China has already started to tighten the rules before Jack Ma made the speech. The timing was close but not because of his disrespect that the Chinese gov't acted but rather because the tech companies need to be monitored with regulations to ensure the safety of the investment.
nice try. but that wasn't what happened
@@WonderfulLidoff if you have done your research, you would have agreed that was exactly what happened.. Don't confuse personal opinions with facts.
@@sablefilms if you did your research, then you would have known exactly what happened. less than a week from what jack ma said, ant's IPO got blocked? it was suppose to go through and got full government support prior to his remarks. brainwashed shill
@@WonderfulLidoff as mentioned, do your research properly not just hearsay from the major media in the west.
@@sablefilms use your brain for once if you have any brain cells left. it might make your life a little easier. but i do feel bad for you since you have none
She gives a clear explanation and is easy to look at ( all of them )
Good analysis...I think it's good that also digital giants feel at least sometimes the force of gravity ;-)
US economy is tie to what the federal bank does. If the Fed reduces interest to almost zero; is free money for plutocrats and investors. They use zero percent Interest and QE to buy stocks and increase the value of the companies, but we all know that quantitative easy creates inflation. The Fed is fighting inflation by stopping the flow of free money for the rich in order to stop inflation. All you have to do is look at what the Fed is doing to predict the economic future. QE and low interest and market and value of companies go up. Quantitative tightening and high interest and is time to sell and markets go down and the value of companies goes down as well.
Why there's so much video carrying about Big Tech, and so few about people who left without job for months?
Low interest rates keep too low for too long making big bubbles. Now these companies must service more debt with rising interest rates. Many small business and startups, heavily debt weighed, are servicing more debt with less available for innovation/growth. More bankruptcies.
background music and some visual effects are annoying than helpful for the content
it's like a serious well-made documentary ruined by bombardment with hans zimmerish blockbuster orchestra
i got your concept of style for thi series
but it's too much
As long as you just keep talking about what Wall St and D.C. are doing to consumers to protect profits, especially inflation right now, instead of the consumers themselves and what they need, you're just wasting time and helping to facilitate the collapse of capitalism. Not that it can be stopped at this point. Winter is coming.
Another intelligent clip by DW 👏and the wonderful knowledgeable expert guests 🙏👌♥️
Netflix did‘t perform well. The timespan is just to short to see the real fall of its stockprice.
Forgot Samsung
LoL ?
If title was software tech companies.. for some.. maybe..
Big tech= TSMC, Nvidia, AMD, Intel, Samsung etc As far as I know they are rockin' it.
Great enthusiasm! Keep loudmouthing!
Sell short!
Mind Begs the Question:
Pegasus - Hacks into iOS,Android
Apple,Google - design iOS,Android
Apple,Google - if leave door open,don't fix
Apple,Google - not responsible,criminal?
TCS
No more stock buy backs because of higher interest rates
Okay? Company buy back their own stocks for more voting power, dividends, and as savings. Buy low sell high. They may do more buy backs if they have the free cash
@@thedude5040 do yourself the favor and TH-cam "stock buy backs" cuz you have no clue wats going on 🤡
ASML, Adyen, Booking Holdings. Just 3 big tech companies from the Netherlands. Really surprised ASML isnt mentioned since without them there is no "big tech".
Alstom: the 'bribery case'
When a copy of The American Trap was spotted on the desk of Huawei founder Ren Zhengfei during a video interview in 2019, the book about the US takeover of French power company Alstom caught the attention of Chinese netizens.
Hailed as "a French industrial jewel," Alstom had been a global leader in various power and transportation fields. It had built power generation stations and transmission lines and railways.
Washington began targeting Alstom as it became a formidable competitor of US giant General Electric (GE) in many countries and regions in the early 2010s. In 2013, Frédéric Pierucci, Alstom's executive and co-author of The American Trap, was arrested by police at a New York airport for "authorizing bribes to Indonesian officials" to secure a contract.
Pierucci wrote in his book that his lawyer had been offered a plea bargain: admit his guilt and be free within months or "risk up to 125 years in jail," the BBC reported in April 2019.
saying AI is going to be next thing is like people in 16 hundreds saying "this science thing is gonna be big". Yeah, sure, but like what exactly is gonna look like?
If you are to ask me, which you didn't, and probably shouldn't anyway, the next big thing is gonna be in material science, which is gonna unlock a richer real life experience. Yes, it's not gonna be something digital. In few words that don't paint the picture well enough, I think 3d printing is gonna be the next big thing, but not like we have it right now. Right now 3d printing is still not accessible and not good enough. I'm envisioning a 3d printing method out of a material that:
- can be almost infinitely recyclable
- requires way less time to be molded in the right shape, say minutes
- easily supports joints
- can be reprogrammed from the outside, at least in certain environments, say homes.
Imagine what Magneto was doing in X-men, but without the power of the mind and probably less evil.
As long as they keep hiring the some of brightest and well educated people people they will be OK
1 John 5:17(KJV)
“All unrighteousness is sin: and there is a sin not unto death.”
So, basicaly is the market maturing, from a growth basis to a more sustainable business model that is not dependent in very risky investments to stay afloat in the enironment of easy money with low interest rates that the main global currencies have been experiencung
Smart phones are your concierge. Never clueless about anything in life.
The real reason it that stocks can't grow forever. We having to go to the Earth. People buy stocks because they them to rise and eventually they selling off if they see stock declining. Don't have much with companies core business.
I feel nothing for Tech stocks. I hope they all fail. 👍
Many people's pension funds have invested in these companies
0:00 - 11:45 - 11:59 💯
0:00 - 11:45 - 13:04 - 13:16 Stronger Together 💯💯💯💯
0:00 - 11:45 - 13:04 - 13:52 🇪🇺🇩🇪Stronger Together💯💯💯💯💯
0:00 - 13:57 “that markets work better”… that’s still a little too vague and promiscuous imo, but okay 🙃🙂I think 🤔
0:00 - 11:45 - 14:23 of course, in the long run it could equally lead to unprecedented growth if Big Tech steps up to evolve with democratic values due to the guardrails/regulations/legislation that forced evolution of such as but not limited to: American Big Tech that the likes of China obviously doesn’t appear to be following democratic values, human rights, etc in a way that comes even adequately close to fitting democratic values instead of dictatorial/autocratic/authoritarian/etc systems that evidently continue to pose a none insignificant risk/temptations of evolving further in these ways, consequentially a seemingly constant temptation of diverging increasingly away from more democratic values for capitalistic focuses instead of an adequate/etc prioritization of democracy over profits. Effectively serving as a none insignificant risk of fanning the flames of perhaps democratic backsliding, etc .. in a none insignificant portion of cases/etc it feels.
It’s never been about making Big Tech smaller or bigger… it’s just about incentivizing Big Tech to take on the challenges of evolving in a way that doesn’t rapidly converge towards authoritarian/autocracy in a way that has a none insignificant risk of reaching towards points of no return of such as but not limited to democratic backsliding, etc
0:00 - 11:46 - 14:48 well said❤️❤️❤️Stronger Together💯💯💯💯
0:00 - 14:48 - 16:32 - 16:55 - 17:48 not really, it just forces an evolution that includes prioritizations of the societies they are released in, not just such as but not limited to profits. It’s not about destroying big tech it’s about protecting the evolution of big tech in a way that encourages built in precautions of risks of i.e. democratic backsliding for cheap gains that may lead past the points of no return if say a Blip in Modern American history by electing a wannabe dictatorial/authoritarian/autocratic leader such as a Trump and his enabled/empowered extremists teams/followers flirting with effectively authoritarian/autocratic/dictatorial ambitions/tendencies
0:00 - 14:48 - 18:46
14:48 - 18:56 - 19:24 - 19:36 just facts💯💯
Thank you for spending the time to create and share this content awareness/perspective🖤❤️💛🙏🏾🇩🇪🇪🇺Etc STRONGEST TOGETHER🇺🇸❤️🤍💙💯💯💯💯💯
Amazon with AWS runs most of internet
The next big thing is green tech. This might take advantage of new technologies like web3 or ai but what’s clear is the purpose
Item# 452 100mm P B 0-100 500um SSP Test In Stock 2526 $35.22 $27.06 $20.26 $13.46 $12.91 $12.09 100mm Silicon Wafer Used for sensor fabrication, spin coating, microfluidics research and Will be used as carrier wafers for etching quantum computing field R&D and more! Best seller!
As far as I'm concerned, M1cr0s0ft, Google and others like Facecrap can all disappear, good riddance. All things that hould be replaced by open source and or peer to peer solutions as much as possible. Things like that.
A bad time for big tech but an awesome year for the weapons makers !
Companies like Supercell, Riot, Epic and Valve are required to sell their shares to Tencent, or net ease if they want to publish games in China.
不是的，不要谣言
That is not true. They can choose to sell on their own.
If its the rule then you should obey it
IBM no longer in the big boy club?
Kicked out of it long ago
@@n.c9653 I have seen/remembered your comments before. Maybe because i'm from NC
@@noahway13 NC?
@@n.c9653 Yes. On coast
Made in USA will be a reality in 2023. 🇺🇸😎✌️💪
*At least, the US has big tech companies, unlike every country in Europe, which does not have any big tech companies. It's been almost 50 years of the software and the Internet industry. The un-skiled and inefficient Europe can only dream of having a big tech company.*
you are uninformed. for making advanced chips, machines from Holland are needed. no other company can build these.
Avg American: Braindead
Image distortion DISLIKE
nothing to see here
Informative it is, but please remove this distractive mediocre music from the background!!!
Aboriginal Lawyers
Ach! the editing, please. So many transitions and those gliches make it so annoying and amateur like
Increased interest rates means cooling off economy. Which means more layoff, job hiring freezes, and decrease salary increases.
Bhau bhau bhau!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
that wmoman has no idea what she is talking about
When will covid end
2 mins - no value => I am leaving
You go woke, you go broke.
funny perception
🤠🤠🤠🤠🤠🤠🤠😎😎😎😎
Meta Goggles Will be coming home to Roost baby yeah 💪🤑🤨👏🇺🇸✌️♥️🤟 Mexicans are welcome! Made in USA though 😉
😑🙏❤
nice but why this trash emo music
While some worry that Musk will turn Twitter into a free speech hellscape, others have lauded the Tesla founder for attempting to reduce the platform’s systemic Left-leaning bias. But the question remains: should we be troubled or encouraged by the concentration of all this power in one man’s hands?
Unherd Magazine Online
Whats the difference between one man having power to do good vs a group of faceless beurocrats having power to influence agendas?
of course, there is China problem. otherwise why een make this video. LOL