Amazing talk. Tim Noakes should be much more prevalent world-wide than he currently is. One day it will be realized and he will be remembered as one of the pioneers.
It seems they were trying to make the human fit the food supply rather than have the food supply fit the human. You can make more money, lots of profit, selling cheap, refined carbohydrates. They have a long shelf-life and massive profit margin. Soda is the ultimate example.
FROM AUSTRALIA - thank you for your presentation especially at 13mins 05 secs on cats eating Hill's Science Diet will get diabetes. That actually happened to my cat!
The message is GREAT, shame that the audio was not taken from a direct feed and not via the external speakers. That said... Thank you for uploading and sharing.
Not bad but Gerald Reaven would have remained a footnote if not for GT. I wish these guys would credit more of their peers. Leaving Taubes going unmentioned is all too common by health science academics. Why? Because he's a journalist, an outsider who makes the professionals look even more foolish for the low-fat travesty. GT should get at least a Pulitzer, if not a Nobel, for GC,BC. Further, modern diet and health science could easily be divided in two eras - pre and post Taubes. Let's all start referring to this great divide in our talks and presentations.
+Fred Cory Agree. Taubes scholarship on the history of calories in/calories out is really eye opening. It is a theory of weight gain without a biochemical basis because the pathway taught in medical schools (i.e., the accepted one) does not fit with CICO but with the pre-CICO school (i.e, that insulin drives obesity).
+Fred Cory "Further, modern diet and health science could easily be divided in two eras - pre and post Taubes. Let's all start referring to this great divide in our talks and presentations." I'm a Taubes fan and all for him receiving due credit. But there were a lot of people who had realized all along that things weren't right. These people get ignored. It's likely that, down the road, Taubes will be ignored. I think the real "dividing period" is WW2. Taubes points this out quite clearly. The more you look, the more you see WW2 as the defining period where the industrialists reinvented science to suit their interests. Money and politics determined where the research dollars went. It was all self-interest and the power of industry. I'm going to up the ante and say that, since WW2 we are increasingly living in a psychopathic society where an almost perfect "industrial feedback loop" has been created. You better believe that GT is simply going to be dismissed and ignored like every other naysayer who has come down the pike.
Yes, WWll was certainly a milestone into a nightmare for public health. And there were many voices but Taubes (thanks to the quality of his scholarship and the information age) made the walls come tumbling down. Atkins was one of many but Taubes delivered the final was the final blow. Lustig and the other Johnny come latlies would still be in a tenured slumber if GT's thunder didn't wake them.
DOCTORS NEGLECT TO TELL PEOPLE WHO HAVE G6PD THAT THEY HAVE A HIGHER RISK FOR DEVELOPING DIABETES AND WOMEN WHO HAVE SONS WITH G6PD ARE TOTALLY IGNORED. THEY TOO NEED TO AVOID G6PD TRIGGER FOODS AND EAT LOW CARB.
But humans are omnivores and evolved with carbs albeit unrefined ones - they've found evidence of bread in Stone Age peeps. I know skinny triathlete vegans - in their 50s and 60s - that do brilliantly
+Audrey Boyle You hear this claim over and over, but it is fairly questionable for a variety of reasons. 1) Some hunter gather cultures eat essentially no carbs. 2) There is evidence going way back, carb source gathering is to produce alcohol (not for food, and alcohol has a totally different metabolic impact). Carb sources spoil quickly anyway and potentially become alcohol anyway.
![[Full Episode] The Restaurant War Thailand ศึกพ่อค้าซ่าแม่ค้าแซ่บ Episode 1 | 22 ก.ย. 67](http://i.ytimg.com/vi/BuzQ70v-UZQ/mqdefault.jpg)
Brilliant I only wish my friends and my children would watch this, they are fed up with me raving about keto.!!!
Amazing talk. Tim Noakes should be much more prevalent world-wide than he currently is.
One day it will be realized and he will be remembered as one of the pioneers.
I like the constant smile on his face
It seems they were trying to make the human fit the food supply rather than have the food supply fit the human. You can make more money, lots of profit, selling cheap, refined carbohydrates. They have a long shelf-life and massive profit margin. Soda is the ultimate example.
FROM AUSTRALIA - thank you for your presentation especially at 13mins 05 secs on cats eating Hill's Science Diet will get diabetes. That actually happened to my cat!
The message is GREAT, shame that the audio was not taken from a direct feed and not via the external speakers.
That said...
Thank you for uploading and sharing.
love this!
Fantastic presentation.
Great info from a pioneer in health
Same thing happened to me. Bad genetics and a high carb diet.
Not bad but Gerald Reaven would have remained a footnote if not for GT. I wish these guys would credit more of their peers. Leaving Taubes going unmentioned is all too common by health science academics. Why? Because he's a journalist, an outsider who makes the professionals look even more foolish for the low-fat travesty. GT should get at least a Pulitzer, if not a Nobel, for GC,BC. Further, modern diet and health science could easily be divided in two eras - pre and post Taubes. Let's all start referring to this great divide in our talks and presentations.
+Fred Cory Agree. Taubes scholarship on the history of calories in/calories out is really eye opening. It is a theory of weight gain without a biochemical basis because the pathway taught in medical schools (i.e., the accepted one) does not fit with CICO but with the pre-CICO school (i.e, that insulin drives obesity).
+Paul Meyer
Yeah, Taubes nailed it. It's the energy balance model. It's a vacuous truth and an industrial lie.
+Fred Cory
"Further, modern diet and health science could easily be divided in two eras - pre and post Taubes. Let's all start referring to this great divide in our talks and presentations."
I'm a Taubes fan and all for him receiving due credit. But there were a lot of people who had realized all along that things weren't right. These people get ignored. It's likely that, down the road, Taubes will be ignored.
I think the real "dividing period" is WW2. Taubes points this out quite clearly. The more you look, the more you see WW2 as the defining period where the industrialists reinvented science to suit their interests. Money and politics determined where the research dollars went. It was all self-interest and the power of industry.
I'm going to up the ante and say that, since WW2 we are increasingly living in a psychopathic society where an almost perfect "industrial feedback loop" has been created. You better believe that GT is simply going to be dismissed and ignored like every other naysayer who has come down the pike.
Yes, WWll was certainly a milestone into a nightmare for public health. And there were many voices but Taubes (thanks to the quality of his scholarship and the information age) made the walls come tumbling down. Atkins was one of many but Taubes delivered the final was the final blow. Lustig and the other Johnny come latlies would still be in a tenured slumber if GT's thunder didn't wake them.
Sorry for my sloppy txt. I'm pressed for time.
DOCTORS NEGLECT TO TELL PEOPLE WHO HAVE G6PD THAT THEY HAVE A HIGHER RISK FOR DEVELOPING DIABETES AND WOMEN WHO HAVE SONS WITH G6PD ARE TOTALLY IGNORED. THEY TOO NEED TO AVOID G6PD TRIGGER FOODS AND EAT LOW CARB.
This dude is the shit
But humans are omnivores and evolved with carbs albeit unrefined ones - they've found evidence of bread in Stone Age peeps. I know skinny triathlete vegans - in their 50s and 60s - that do brilliantly
+Audrey Boyle You hear this claim over and over, but it is fairly questionable for a variety of reasons. 1) Some hunter gather cultures eat essentially no carbs.
2) There is evidence going way back, carb source gathering is to produce alcohol (not for food, and alcohol has a totally different metabolic impact). Carb sources spoil quickly anyway and potentially become alcohol anyway.
If Noakes is so good why is he balding with a creepy comb-over? Not to mention his stunted ugly teeth.
Kimberley H.
A specious and juvenile comment ! Either you have not listened to Dr Noakes's argument or you are one of those preachy vegan!