12 Most Mysterious Ancient Technologies Scientists Still Can't Explain
ฝัง
- เผยแพร่เมื่อ 6 มิ.ย. 2024
- For copyright matters, advertising and other questions, please contact us at: lightningtopchannel@gmail.com
Subscribe ► bit.ly/2knsQP7
The technological achievements of our ancient ancestors were outstanding, and they often don’t get enough credit for them. There were things our ancestors could do with bricks and stones in the distant past that we’d struggle to replicate today - so much so that we can’t help but wonder if some of the technology of the distant past has been lost. We’re not alone in wondering about that - many people feel the same way, and you might join them after watching this video!
#Amazing #AbandonedTechnologies #ScientistsStillCan'tExplain #EverSee #Compilation #LightningTop
![ไม่ต้องมีที่ที่ให้ฉันอยู่ แต่ขอแค่มีฉันอยู่ก็พอ (Spaceless) - getsunova [SHORT FILM]](http://i.ytimg.com/vi/MuT0d_cvJkc/mqdefault.jpg)
I believe in the fact that a huge amount of knowledge was lost in the fires and catastrophies primitive people did in ancient libraries like Alexandria
Most ancient knowledge was passed down by apprenticeship not written world.
They were not ancient, their knowledge are better than nowadays
@@jonathansturgisjs o80o08⁰pp
The precise stone carving may be just a prototype of large pyramid
@@jonathansturgisjs Wrong! There were or still there are lots of tangible information and wisdom but hidden from most of us.
I've always felt we have lost some math/knowledge along the way. The fires at the great library in Alexandria helped ensure that loss.
Well this Ball's been here a long time and I would only assume we're not the first ones here and we won't be the last. 📡👽🇺🇸 RUN!!! A lot of technologies we're not ready for we don't know how to handle them I.e nuclear.
Like the first emperor of china. He had destroyed technology and medicine that has been passed down for thousands of years. There's a lot of knowledge that cure the current disease that we have no clue to cure.
Id be curious to know whats in Vatican archives. Supposedly there's like 56 miles worth of scrolls and books and whatnot down there.
@@jared4902 kinda makes you wonder why they'd want to keep it hidden, does it prove everything they're saying wrong? Are they hiding it so they can keep their grasp on the religious? Hmmm
Or perhaps that stone was once wood that petrified
I absolutely loved this video's subject! More people need to question our past. Also, I never get to be one of the first people to comment on a new posting. Thank you and keep putting up great content.
These are definitely my favorite. They have tons of them, too.
We could also do with more people questioning our present! We are being asked to buy some pretty silly ideas today as well....
It's not unreasonable to conclude that our civilization might not be as far beyond our ancestors as we would like to think
or that there might have been other civilizations that had as much tech as ours before being wiped out by a catastrophe.
Or maybe each civilization had their own speciality
While it cant be taken as proof, the angels in the bible taught men technology beyond their time which is one of the reason for the great flood.
Imagine if that was true.
@@Delacrow_l_Chawngthu Maybe. Any record on the period, no matter how accurate can only amount to cliff's notes, basically.
Given that the 1800's was filled with "archeologists" and "historians" who's entire job was to misinterpret history and destroy evidence of prior civilizations advances to further glorify the European nations... even though for the most of history Europe was the least advanced hub of civilization.
I would wager your on the right track.
the spark plug is just another example of the ridiculous examples of age testing being laughably inaccurate
How does this guy know they only used bricks and stone? Just because that’s all that is left after 10k years of weathering doesn’t mean that’s all they had.
He doesn't know.. he clearly said that scientists say they used that stuff.
India has so many mysteries that there is no way they can be accidental. Agree that man. Ancestors are ahead of our times.
The iron oxide shell around the 1920's sparkplug is not a mystery. Apparently, the method of dating it is flawed.
Agreed, its probably a rusted peice of the engine itself
What method? The truth is it was never dated.
@@danbiss87 Its not pure metal, just likely a concretion of minerals, similar to a stalactite, which can form in decades.
@@poeticalvision 👍
@@poeticalvision Wouldn't it be an 'accretion' ?
Rust proofing iron is no big mystery, & it's been well know since the iron-age... I can duplicate the coating on the pillar in about an hour using nothing more than vinegar & boiling water. It's called rust bluing. The vinegar creates a thin layer of iron oxide ( you can just let it form naturaly, but it takes longer), boiling the item turns the surface into a hard black, rust proof layer that can last indefinately... The pillar was likely quenched after casting, with the mass holding enough heat to boil the water around it...
like a brown bess rifle. salt cured anti rust surface.
I am recommending you for the Nobel prize.
@@lukewarmwater6412 Fine musket indeed, i just inherited a 1722 and a 1723 B.B. Both in stellar condition.
It’s so amazing how we have books and scrips from thousands of years ago. But don’t know how people did anything of these things.
Thanks to all of you who already pointed out to Lightning Top that they misrepresented the Coso Artifact.
Yes, that's me at time index 1:48. It was lifted from a Seattle Times article that reported that geologists from the University of Washington examined the Coso Artifact after I provided it to them and the Pacific Science Center in Seattle, Washington.
As you may have guessed, their analysis showed that there was absolutely nothing special about the iron oxide nodule surrounding the Champion spark plug. There are numerous examples of spark plugs that became encased in iron oxide nodules and the Spark Plug Collectors of America enjoy finding them and have a good laugh over them.
It's amazing that despite the proof to the contrary some people still think it is some kind of ancient artifact. I've just read your piece on it from the TalkOrigins archive ... excellent work, thank you.
My guess was that the spark plug tips where coated with platinum, or some other catalyst (like they do,) and THAT caused the rust to form quicker than it would have without.
And if thus guy says "artifiCHal" one more time.....
Dammit ... I enjoyed that OOPART~!
9:43 they were probably as smart as us...
Thank you that was awesome I learned a lot great imaging great Contant overall very impressed thank you
As technology and knowledge grow we'll realize that our ancestors were not primitive at all and the past isn't exactly inferior to our present or future
I wonder what we could do if we didn't have today's distractions ?
Without slave labor? Not much
The Coso artifact is not a puzzle to anyone. The spark plug is encased in a concretion. That's what happens when an object gets buried and water filtering through the ground above it carries minerals that attach themselves to the object. It is a very simple and well understood process and the Coso artifact is not an OOP.
Blueberries.
12:57 That looks exactly like a tooth for a backhoe
I always wondered if the Nazca Lines weren't some sort of cartography training. I'd imagine they were similar to a graduation test
My wife and I took a private flight over Nazca ten years ago. Quite an experience!
Or maybe it was them trying to talk to the "God's" (aliens) ?
Awsome👍👍👍
The spark plug is clearly an iron concretion, which is a natural occurrence. Much like how a pearl forms in an oyster. The spark plug attracted iron particles that then attract additional forming an encasement around the foreign object.
I'm amazed they didn't somehow claim that aliens did it
Spark plug. It's not the only thing that this has happened to. Mining tools and cowboy boot with leg in it. You can find stalagmites and stalactites in basements and water fountains with a hard water issue.
Wouldn't similar finds as the spark plug throw doubt onto many dating attempts?
Drilling a perfect hole or carving a rock with great precision is impressive, but not impossible. There are many "unskilled" workers today that could eyeball things with incredible accuracy. It's just knowing your tools, and doing the same thing thousands of times.
agreed
How did they do it?
And further... when your god-king told you to do it, you bloody well put the time and effort into doing it. Otherwise... you weren't just going to be fired.
@@jmz2144 Time and the uncertainty of death
Yup, ancient does not equal stupid. They have their own way to do things. Us would be considered primitive too for future human.
I’m not sure we have lost the tech to do a lot of this , I believe we have lost the passion . As the clock ticks and time goes on ( GENERALLY SPEAKING) we have become lazier and lazier due to technology itself . We live in a throw away culture and we have about zero patients for anything . We don’t value the things we have because they are easily replaced .
Spot on!
Please do more videos about that! :) your voice is amazing btw✅
You earned a subscription
What we really don't know is how long it took them to drill a hole in rock or if they even measured production in clock time like we do now. If compared to current standards, where drilling any less than hundreds of holes per day would be unacceptable, they were likely not in a big hurry. There is a great lesson to be learned here.
Source: Trust me!!
i agree, today we have places to be, work, meetings, birthdays, school, back then there was no rush for all they knew this was the one thing they were born to do !
And the method? Still hasn't been reproduced in any convincing way by those who have done "demonstrations".
I would think the Pythagoras cup was to divide utilities like water, so that it's used wisely--especially if the supplies are limited.
I think it’s a Chinese invention.
I first heard the cup mentioned in a pre-calculus class I took years ago at a university. My professors explanation for the cup was that Pythagoras would give his students these cups when he had them divide up wine between themselves. That way if the student who was pouring the wine became greedy and decided to pour himself more than the others, he would then be embarassed by the cup emptying the wine all over the table, exposing the students greed in front of the others. I have no idea where this version of the story came from, but found it interesting. It may not be the actual origins of the cup, but I found it interesting none the less
@@johnnybodybags3994 makes the most sense
The geometric shapes edged in the desert of Kazakhstan at 6:33 , 6:54 , and 7:04 look like some type of blades on a rotorcraft . Triple and quadruple set of blades , similar like the Boeing Chinook- 47 + 1 extra set of blades or modern drones like we have today.
Nature is filled with geometric perfection.
Time had a different value in those days ,it didn't need to be done in a couple years building could be stretched out over decades with no projected opening date
Pride in what do you! That's what's needed today.
3:45 "It would have to be artifitchal!" Artifitchal??
Love the relaxing ambiance your background music gives
Yeah... thats a cool way to push some knowledge into a morons brain
@@yachasiki4676 best comment this week
Even back then, they needed a "Rock Solid" ignition... 🔥 for Time Travel..
It was a Ford, Mercury, Lincoln, or (dare I say it) an Edsel!
As a Glass blower I have to say, The Phoenicians may have discovered glass and the Egyptians may have turned it into a trade but the Italian Romans Really perfected the techniques we use today. Although the formulas differ, the range of colors that can be attained all started with them. They applied a Scientific approach to the entire process and all we have fone is built upon that. . The Major reason I blow glass is because Im always in wonderment when the piece is completed. I often ask myself.."Did I do That?!"..XD I hand the ability and self wonderment to my Predecessors. I only hope Im included as one sometime in the future.. XP
My willy is made of glass,dew it
I'm sorry
White supremacy thought. Saharan Africans(maybe moors or berbers) (def ancient egypt) perfected all these glass colors techniques and trades
I heard the Venetians were the best glass makers in the world.
Well, One from the 17th and 18th century may express that but the artisans of that time were using tools and formulas from the previous 1200 years, The Roman Techniques and industrial applications were well established for the Venetians.. The Romans just had the Talent pool of the entire conglomerated Empire and concentrated it all on one peninsula and applied it at an industrial scale, Great discoveries and streamlining are expected. Thats why very little has changed for the modern Artisan, We still use the same tools and techniques. Granted, The industrial revolution did change the formulas a lot as science developed better glasses for industrial applications vs Consumer based /Utilitarian and with that, some crossover techniques of today were simply impossible back then as they are specific to the type of glass being worked, . As a whole though Its still glass and works all the same.
What about the Lysuegis Cup that had nanotechnology and the legendary "unbreakable" and reshapable "glass".
Our "ancients" were AMAZING weren't they.
Ok good explain 😘😀❤️
Thanks bro! Very nice!
Antikythera ring a bell?
Those so called smooth holes had definite marks that cutting teeth on a core drill leave when it’s retrieved after boring a hole.
And if corrundum can cut granite, then any ruby laden bits may have been taken by raiding parties or locked in a Vatican vault. Not sure what you can do with sinew dipped in resin or tar and coated in ruby/sapphire/garnet/diamond, but maybe cutting stone isn't beyond them since you can get good speed out of those hand powered wheel drills.
Also: sulfure stone, fluorite crystal and water are all you need to make hydrofluoric acid which can dissolve silicates like granite. There's tell of a plant that was used, and I'm betting it was a plant that grew over fluorite granite and its soils. If reduced to a slurry, it could have been a sort of acidic lubricant that eased cutting and didn't harm non silicate gemstones. Maybe even jade could do the job? You could make some great bits from jade that might not dissolve... but I can't say for sure.
@@Cretaal Copper drills were routinely used by Egyptians as evinced by hieroglyphic depictions, including through granite when aided by quartz sand and water. The process has been repeatedly demonstrated IRL.
@@bigglesmcgillicuddy3388 the process has been demonstrated yes, but leaves very different markings in the hole.
You may be right.?? But to have that type of advanced technology 5 thousand years ago is the question..
They did leave tool marks on the drilled holes.
Yes and the grooves look like they are all going in at a constant rate not being pushed by a man. I work on a milling machine and get the same marks when the tips are worn.
@@damianbutterworth2434 exactly! I find it interesting how those of us who have actually worked with powered equipment see these obvious details right away yet there is a group of academics who have no experience continue to ague these artifacts were made with Bronze Age tools. Further these people who could not build a birdhouse are considered to be the experts in ancient construction methods.
@@hecanseeme8210 They should measure the distance between the machining grooves to find out more, A copper tube with sand and rope powering it like I`ve seen as the reason would just give a smooth hole. Like you say they have no common sense.
@@damianbutterworth2434 another proposed theory is that thousands of years ago, they weren't working with "rock", but that they were actually working with "cement" or "clay" which over time has fossilised into "rock". then that is why the machining marks are so apparent
insert technical terms where necessary.
@@damianbutterworth2434 Not to mention that a copper tube with sand and rope can't explain what we see at 5:29...
03:00 The modern object embedded in rock, is explained as follows; the ancients made rock, in the stone age, today this rock was made intentionally or accidentally in the same way, so no time travel, but just an object mixed with mud and dried at high temperature and high pressure.
If you look at the inner surface of the holes drilled into the granite you can see the tell-tale grooves that accompany such drilling. However, the distance between the grooves suggests that the drill was going through the granite at quite a pace. So the problem just gets even deeper. How the Hell did they do that??
In ancient times they have a rare metal which is able to cut stone like wood ...now the rare metal is finish from Earth.
"They" didn't. It simply was not "them".
Copper drills aided by quartz sand and water. The process has been demonstrated. Copper was the most common metal in ancient Egypt and they're known to have routinely used copper drills, even in granite. There are hieroglyphs depicting it.
@@bigglesmcgillicuddy3388 Apples and oranges. You miss the vital point (first pointed out by Sir Flinders Petrie) that the grooves are NOT circles (as they would be with copper drills) but continuous spirals with a bore spacing so wide that even modern powered drills could not achieve that speed of drilling. The fact that hieroglyphics depict ancient Egyptians making holes in soft limestone is totally irrelevant because everyone accepts that they DID drill holes in soft stone. The point you are missing is that the methods they used could not have made six or nine-inch holes several yards deep (!) in granite, as found in Abu Ghraib and elsewhere. The SPIRAL grooves indicate a revolving cutting tool. Copper drills would make just circular marks.
@@bigglesmcgillicuddy3388 you're wrong on many levels. Would you like to discuss them😂
Interesting stuff the likes of which are never taught in school.
The cup is easy to explain. It's a technique called fuming still used today. Flame working was around back then. They used rudimentary torches to burn the gold into the glass. Not unsolved
It's even been advanced to create all sorts of colors go watch corning museum of glass.
You mean to say the contemporary QUACKADEMIA can't explain..
Great content mate, keep it up!
the hole drilling segment has be tested adding sand to the copper say/drill. it is slow but it dose cut.
Same as using a pocket knife to cut down an oak tree "slow but it does cut
Mayan Calendar shows that we are on the 5th civilization or so of people on earth. We are only studying the early, primitive inhabitants of our own civilization! The other civilization were many more times advanced then we are today. Each civilization lasted tens of thousand years before a cataclysmic event happened and wiped out the majority of the population. This will happen again some time in the future.
Don't you remember the world ended already in 2012! There was even a movie about it!
The spark plug wouldn’t be so puzzling if scientists could admit their way of dating things is not always accurate and variables that are unknown exist. When you think you know everything it becomes much harder to learn things and understand things.
There are literally hundreds of articles on ancient hole drilling methods, by scientists, archeologists and geologists.
Also, "precision" is a relative term. These "precision" structures, holes, designs, etc. are precise relative to the age, technology and methods available to that time. There's literally been nothing that we've discovered that we can't create today and be able to do faster and more precisely.
It's fun to speculate, but they had methods that were just as clever and ground breaking as our relative respectives are to us.
They had access to diamonds and several metals either locally or through trade. They were going hundreds of miles to source stones and materials, they knew what they were doing. I get tired of the" Scientists have no idea" line used in so many videos.
You guys need to understand engineering and science to understand that there are unexplained artifacts that we find. What you stated is false. We cannot create today everything that we have discovered. You are welcome to write it, you can believe it, and you can use this comment section with clever comebacks, but it is still not fact. False blunder. Passionate opinions worrying by consumers of limited information
there is no way we could make a granite box that is as perfect as the one being studied there. seven diferent companies would go bankrupt trying.
@@focalgain Well said
the more you know, the more you realize you don't know.
"The slopes of the structure are ALMOST EXACTLY the same as the slopes of the pyramid at Giza." It would be MORE truthful to say what the slopes of the structure are NOT like...about 999 gazillion things!
The object referred to as an axe, appears more like the tips/teeth on a bucket of an excavator or backhoe.
It does, but it wouldn't last long unless the material was easy to dig, like in mud or sand.
first thing that came to my mind was "excavator bucket" too haha
Maybe they did have a microscope 1600 years ago!
I have been in Napa huaca. Precision is everywhere, except for the much later Inca construction. The living rock has been machined to close tolerances. You can find the nearly exact carving in the fountain at Ollantaytambo, Where I also have been, and can attest as to the nearly identical similarities.
14:54, these inscriptions found on the same iron column. The runes are different. The column is inscribed with different languages. Have anyone so far deciphered these? I see similarities to the proto-bulgarian runes. The Indian runes have been translated, but what about the other ones?
Aliens.
1:45 If it is 'Fanciful Thinking', Archeologists would be able to explain in some detail the technology used to make it.
The fact Archeologists have no clue whatsoever as to how it was made, suggests proposed ideas of what it was used for are not so 'Fanciful'.
Are they!
Or maybe an archeologist could have a conversation with a lapidary, or visit a working stone quarry.
@@hohner51 exactly
Its probably because they'd have rewrite the history books if they admit a previous advanced race here on Earth before us !
So lets say we dont know 😏
The Kosovo aluminum object is a tooth from an excavator bucket, not an axe.
They dated it at the age they did based on the surrounding material, not the actual object, which I'm guessing broke off during a 20th century construction project that was abandoned.
Good call. Yep, I was thinking the same thing.
Came here to say this, but I knew someone would already have.
🤣😂🤣 you ever see an excavator bucket with aluminum teeth? Hell no. That's because they wouldn't last two minutes. I ain't saying it's alien. I am saying it damn sure IS NOT the tooth from an excavator bucket. Use your brain man.
Never saw aluminum used for any sort of excavator tooth
@@harryneumann8304 they where used for coal mining. Since aliuminium is less likely to cause sparks which is very hazardous in the coal mining industry. With all the gases and coal dust in the air. Preventing sparks while keeping up with the mining methods of the time . There was a huge coal industry in Romania
Lovely
Sometimes modern technology makes us forget ancient ways
3:04 this should actually cause the scientific community to question their dating method. We can't just take everything scientist say hook line and sinker, especially the issue of dating
Especially the issues of any of their "theories". Our science hasn't even scratched the surface.
"actually"
Except that specimen was never dated. Not by anyone. And no citation suggesting 500k years has ever been provided. Because it's bunk. This specimen was a result of concretion, which can occur over decades rather than eons.
RAVAN had his own viman(aircraft)is evidence in Ramayan
Great channel! Very, very informative!
Correction. Tool marks are most certainly present in the bore holes found in granite. Studied since Flinders Petrie.
There were spiral grooves found in Egyptian granite cores and the cutting rate was much faster than modern core drills.
13:31 I think it may have been a farming tool dragged by a large animal. The dip on the side could have stabilized it
the problem is the dating. It's being dated before homo sapiens basicly
@@RodrigoRocha-of2xb ah, now I see the mystery. Ok I got it, dinos on wheels
The fact that we couldn't do it today shows plenty.
We very much could, the narrator is being hyperbolic. There are even many videos on TH-cam of people using simple and complex tools in creative ways with a variety of scales. People in a time period with no powered tools came up with smart ways to do grand things after all, they are not less intelligent then those living today.
Interesting stuff.I'm rather surprised though that the most incredible ancient artefact wasn't included : *The Antikythera mechanism* "the world's oldest analogue computer"
'Computer' is too general a term. It was used to predict solar, or cosmic, events.
I'd say that it's an analogue computer. Primitive, but still a computer ...
The answer is, never underestimate the skills of early man.
Never underestimate the power of a man with a whip, or if you don't get 'x' done your family doesn't eat
I can see why the cup didn't catch on.
When the expert doesn't know what is it they will become expert in bullshitting
The experts think it's boring to read the diaries of common people an labourers from the past.
They would rather gleam from the past through they eyes of degenerate elite.
Spark plug could of still had a piece of iron head used at that time attached around it and ended up being next to another iron element and the two merged messing with the test results for dating.
The holes could they not just be core samples taken later for testing date, material composition etc... the size and shapes of most core driller bits.
No, in many cases the holes were drilled in the process of creating the piece.
For the last one, it's possible it has nothing to do with the common language for that area or Latin. It's possible it could be a phrase in Dutch given the sculptor is Flemish. It's possible it could very well belong to a lost language we may never recover.
The aluminium “artefact” I think resembles a tooth from a large excavator of some kind.
it does kinda look like that, but excavators use ultra hard steel and carbide, aluminum is fairly soft
@@katsumiskytower8714 They also use duraluminum, which is 90% aluminum, identical to this specimen. Unlike steel shovels, Duraluminum won't cause sparks (and ignition) when working in areas near gas line methane pockets. Duraluminum also oxidizes very rapidly, giving the aged and pitted appearance. It is an excavator tooth. Little doubt of that.
Thoughtful. However, Aluminum is a considered far too soft a metal and unlikely to be used in a "typical" excavation tooth.
@@luxxul7236 Duralumin is used for excavation teeth. It wasn't conjecture, I was pointing out a fact. I worked in an aluminum plant for nearly twenty years. There are numerous alloys of aluminum, and several structural grades are more than capable.
@@bigglesmcgillicuddy3388 Ty for the input
Being that we know concrete gets harder as it ages, why can't we believe that stone like granite has gotten harder over time?
No
News flash from a "Jeweler" who has roamed the Cairo Grand Bazaar many times ... when we affix a Gold/Silver emblem to a signant ring with black Onyx top (very hard material ... more than Granite), we use to this day a "Brass Tube" along with pumice and water to core drill the hole to allow a riveting action to firmly secure the emblem to the Onyx stone. We do us an "electro mechanical lap drill" for ease and speed (takes about 6 hours to drill through a 1/8" stone) but it gets the job done and could easily have been accomplished with a "Bow Drill" ... both Brass and Copper were readily available during the time of the Giza constructs. Just so you know that ones relatively easy to explain. No Aliens necessary.
6 hours to go through 1/8" of stone with a diameter of what, 1/16 of an inch? Ok, lets talk about the 1000's of holes through granite, andesite etc... that are much much larger and deeper. Lets also throw in the various star shaped holes through the same material. How about the tool marks and striations inside some of these holes that are not circular scratches, but confirmed to be continuous spiraling tool marks that progress uniformly down into the hole. The evidence is everywhere that will contradict the accepted claims of how it was achieved. The more you actually analyze the evidence, the clearer it becomes how little we know of history.
@Craig Sowers Explain the one at 5:29... what type of "bow drill" does that, because it's not circular.
Another apples and oranges explanation. It just does not account for the facts. But then, when did archaeologists ever value the real facts over their precious theories?
Man, I wish I had some smile cookies right now.
So is that cup the first bell syphon?
That one looks like an excavator bucket.
Do you really make people think there were no diamonds back then
Is that carving at the last item, with the shepherds the one talked about in the book "holy blood, holy Grail?"
You missed most common fact that almost all toylets use the same principle that pitagoras cup does
A number of references in the Bible to a worm called the Shamir worm that would be put into a lead tube and it would cut through rock in perfect lines...used in the early iron age by King Solomon in his building constructions, perhaps we should be lookin in that direction.. amazing!
You just need to visit ancient Indian temples , u'r mind will be blowned by ancient stone-technologies .
The stone cutting technology of then is the same as today. The difference is that they had to work harder and take longer. We, on the otherhand have power tools.
Wrong. Much of the stonework is literally impossible to achieve without having tools that exceed our present capabilities. Those core drills show one continuous spiral indicating a rate of cutting that can only be matched today when drilling through plastic. We don't have a method of hollowing out a 50 ton block of granite to make a box from a single piece, etc. The evidence that power tools were used 1000's of years ago is everywhere.
I think they used the energy of the sun somehow.
They used a whip
Well said bill
The aluminum artifact is a knuckle for a machine of some type, you can tell its slap wore out, this is a small piece of a much larger machine
That Romanian aluminum artifact at 12:50 was confirmed to be a tooth from an excavator.
Aluminum teeth on an excavator?! Were they trying to break it by lunchtime?
Yeah pretty sure no one made an excavator from aluminum
@@charlesterrizzi8311 Yeah, they do make sacrificial bucket teeth out of aluminum. It's not even that uncommon.
Shows how much we don’t know and never will know.
Modern people: I made a new discovery...!!!
Ancient people: Really? Hold this 🍺
String not flying machines our ancestors were very clever
The holes in the granite are made using copper pipe, Quartz sand and water
👌👌👌
The Pythagorus cup is also called the Greedy Cup...
Lots of guesswork
Perhaps to drill round holes they put grit from rocks harder than the rock being drilled down the hole and the turning action of the shaft caused the hard particles to cut through the softer rock.
What rocks were they using that were harder then granite🤦♂️
It’s not aluminum it’s aluminium! 😡
Nothing like a spark plug to prove that dating methods don't work as well as some people think they do.
Dating methods work fine. Misuse of the methods by quacks leads to videos like this.
I agree. There’s sooooo much wrong with carbon dating as it stands. But don’t argue with the “experts” right? They’re “educated”… 🤓😏
Dude I lost a wrench years ago I later found looked much like the spark plug
The so called aluminum axe looks like a tooth off an excavator bucket