Death & Dungeons & Dragons: Resurrection in 5e D&D - Web DM

แชร์
ฝัง
  • เผยแพร่เมื่อ 24 พ.ย. 2024

ความคิดเห็น • 494

  • @WebDM
    @WebDM  6 ปีที่แล้ว +8

    Thanks for watching! Want more Web DM in your life? Get our podcast here: www.patreon.com/webdm

  • @LemanRussVanquisher
    @LemanRussVanquisher 7 ปีที่แล้ว +128

    On an alternate note; As a DM I actually really like revivify, to me it smacks of the idea that someone flatlines and you hit the with the defib paddles or epi needle and jolt them back to life before they have a chance to suffer from brain damage and the other nasty side effects of... death.

    • @JimCullen
      @JimCullen 7 ปีที่แล้ว +22

      Yup, that's exactly how I think of the _revivify_ option. It's not true resurrection like the other spells, but just a last-minute way of staving off death. It's the only resurrection spell that I _wouldn't_ remove or at least nerf if I'm going for a hardcore experience.

    • @JimCullen
      @JimCullen 7 ปีที่แล้ว +10

      Not to mention, it's super expensive to cast. At such a low level, you're not going to have the resources to bring people back more than maybe once or twice over a campaign.

    • @dynamicworlds1
      @dynamicworlds1 6 ปีที่แล้ว +17

      Same. To me, death in a fantasy setting is a process.
      Body stopping vital functions.
      Body begins to decay
      Soul detaches from body
      Soul leaves mortal plane
      Soul arrives in waiting plane
      Soul is judged
      Soul is sent to real afterlife
      Soul arrives in the afterlife
      At each step, returning them is a different level of magic.
      Revivify is analogous to what real world medical science can do, so is totally within the realm of a low-magic fantasy setting as they're only "mostly dead" and really, within 1 minute, wouldn't even be considered dead today IRL.
      Of course, some means of death would instantly put someone outside of the reach of such a spell, and that would make those causes of death more terrifying. Further, you can easily adjust the feel of how it works by defining how hard (up to and including being impossible) each step is. To me, the obvious cut off is that once a soul is residing in the afterlife, it can't come back, but for low magic, once it leaves the material world, being out of reach is reasonable.
      This, combined with a bit of uncertainty at least in the duration of each step (if not even the certainty of success) can really preserve the feel of danger while allowing the party access to minor resurrection magic.
      Of course, you really want to make players afraid, paying attention to monsters that can steal or consume souls can become a big deal.

  • @VechsDavion
    @VechsDavion 7 ปีที่แล้ว +78

    This happened in my world. At first I told players to just deduct the gold value of the diamonds from their gold total when they used a rez of any kind. Training wheels mode. Then, later in the campaign, the capital city gets attacked by an undead army -- thousands dead. Nobles and the middle class start popping those rez diamonds, and suddenly you can't find a single diamond on the market anymore. I give each player a rez diamond that was assumed to be on their person at the time, and beyond that, finding a rez diamond is going to be an endeavor. I think controlling the diamond supply is the best way to adjust the power of the rez line of spells in 5e.

    • @CompCompface
      @CompCompface 6 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      Vechs I just read the spells as they were mentioned, and was scrolling through to see whether any comments mentioned the material costs. This is such a good idea, it’s great!

    • @johnnye87
      @johnnye87 6 ปีที่แล้ว +2

      The problem with that is that it specifies "a diamond worth 1000gp" (or whatever it is). So if you make diamonds scarcer, 1000gp may get you a much smaller diamond... but by RAW, it's still enough for the spell. Because the forces of magic really care about the price of luxury goods for some reason.
      (Obviously that's ludicrous and should be changed, my point is that *just* changing the availability of diamonds without also tweaking the rules isn't going to have the desired effect.)

    • @Mazer2721
      @Mazer2721 6 ปีที่แล้ว +3

      ​@@johnnye87 Yeah, instead of requiring a diamond of a certain cash value (since that's completely dependent on the market) you could base it on the quality of its 4 Cs (its carat weight, clarity, cut, and color) regardless of the current market value. Players could potentially make a mini adventure out of having to track down a raw diamond of suitable quality then make a separate adventure to find a craftsman who's actually skilled enough to work a diamond to the proper cut.

    • @jakehoyer8668
      @jakehoyer8668 6 ปีที่แล้ว +3

      @@johnnye87 this is where you have to make the distinction between the value of the diamond and the actual price of the diamond.
      I've always taken it as the spell requires a diamond with a material value of 1000gp. This diamond may have a price of 800-2000GP when your players try to buy it, but its material value will always stay the same. This makes more sense as then the "1000gp" directly refers to the physical properties and dimensions of the diamond rather than what the market sells it as; I don't think magic cares much for economic fluctuations. The use of the word "worth" in the original wording of the spell is the source of the problem here

  • @pkrangehit
    @pkrangehit 6 ปีที่แล้ว +25

    Clerics could hold a resurrection auction. Everyone brings important people that dies that day and revive goes to the highest bidder

  • @Bluecho4
    @Bluecho4 7 ปีที่แล้ว +74

    The idea of an eternal warrior - repeatedly returned when the kingdom needs him - reminds me of King Arthur, slumbering in Avalon until Britain's greatest time of need. (Incidentally, if things like WWII or other terrible parts of the 20th and 21st century _aren't_ Britain's greatest time of need, I dread to think what events are yet to come that Arthur hasn't come back yet. At least according to the myth, obviously.)
    I'm now imagining a secret place, kept somewhere in the realm, where a great warrior king's body is kept and watched over by a secret order of holy monks and wizards. Individuals regularly casting Gentle Repose to keep the body fresh, and Circle of Protection so no ghosts try to claim it for their own. The order would probably be made - wholly or partially - of elves, since they can live for a long time. And they just stay there, guarding the king's cadaver until such time as he's needed again.

    • @jimdavis141
      @jimdavis141 7 ปีที่แล้ว +15

      Bluecho4 I like that and turning it around on the villain. There’s an eternal champion of evil and if you know the right rituals, a nefarious cultist or foul magician can bring back this champion to cleave a path of destruction through the good and noble realms.

    • @NeflewitzInc
      @NeflewitzInc 7 ปีที่แล้ว +9

      How do we know that King Arthur didn't awake during those times? Sounds like a kick ass campaign idea/comic book.

    • @MetaMdad
      @MetaMdad 7 ปีที่แล้ว +3

      Bluecho4 i mean to be honest England wasn't conquered in WWII so technically it wasn't the time of greatest need. Either that or the old king has the worst case of too good to use syndrome

    • @ReustersPlace
      @ReustersPlace 7 ปีที่แล้ว +2

      NeflewitzInc King Arthur as a Spitfire Pilot fending off the Huns

    • @yaldabaoth2
      @yaldabaoth2 4 ปีที่แล้ว

      It's a typical savior myth. Religions have them (Zoroastrianism, Judaism, Christianity, Islam), nations (England, Germany, Ireland) have them and probably many other things have them as well.

  • @delphydallon217
    @delphydallon217 7 ปีที่แล้ว +72

    As a french native speaker, i realy appreciate that ALL your Web DM shows are fully understandable without any subtitles (even if i don't get all your references imo). Eatch phrase isn't speaked too fast and eatch word is well articulate. Realy some quality job done here!

    • @mattiaroccaro3544
      @mattiaroccaro3544 4 ปีที่แล้ว +2

      Idem, by an italian cousin.

    • @martthesling
      @martthesling 3 ปีที่แล้ว

      You don't get all the American cultural references?😂

  • @derekburge5294
    @derekburge5294 7 ปีที่แล้ว +154

    Excuse you! The polite term is living impaired!

  • @wyattweber9983
    @wyattweber9983 7 ปีที่แล้ว +102

    Surprised there was no mention of Clone, probably the craziest resurrection spell of them all

    • @ShivaX51
      @ShivaX51 7 ปีที่แล้ว +42

      Clone is pretty insane. There is effectively no limit on it and it also bypasses old age. Make a clone, live your life. Die. Come back. Make a new clone. Repeat forever.

    • @glacialrelic7878
      @glacialrelic7878 7 ปีที่แล้ว +2

      True

    • @brandonpatterson634
      @brandonpatterson634 7 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      Gninthgil or something like Gandalf the Grey

    • @gnarlestongnu637
      @gnarlestongnu637 6 ปีที่แล้ว +2

      If you want real fun, don't let someone play their own clone - use it as an opportunity to bring in a new player... with limited amnesia, of course :)

    • @xandermoore9119
      @xandermoore9119 6 ปีที่แล้ว

      Add an element of Soul Deterioration from the Clone spell. After 5 clones, you lose the ability to do X, after 10, you lose Y, after 20, your soul can't come back at all anymore.

  • @babassoonist557
    @babassoonist557 7 ปีที่แล้ว +44

    Gentle repose is a second level spell not a cantrip

  • @misterdanny5421
    @misterdanny5421 7 ปีที่แล้ว +5

    Here's a thought: Crawling Claw is the re-animated hand of a murderer. If the dead character has murdered, then when you resurrect him, maybe his hands fall off, leaving two annoying critters and one character unarmed.

  • @MrAces023
    @MrAces023 7 ปีที่แล้ว +96

    I got a sicknesses and the only cure is more web DM

    • @NarutoGeek411
      @NarutoGeek411 7 ปีที่แล้ว +12

      How about a Minotaur Bard/Cleric who plays the cowbell and worships Hathor, the Egyptian bovine goddess?

    • @finnianquail8881
      @finnianquail8881 7 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      TheOtakuGamer Wut

    • @MrAces023
      @MrAces023 7 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      TheOtakuGamer I am screaming

    • @MrAces023
      @MrAces023 7 ปีที่แล้ว +2

      I gotta have more Cow Bell

    • @drowjack
      @drowjack 7 ปีที่แล้ว

      DEAD LAUGHING and no Rez...hahaha

  • @samchafin4623
    @samchafin4623 3 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    I came up with the idea, and haven't had the opportunity to try it out in a game, that the magic brings the target back from the dead immediately, but to make the resurrection permanent, the party has to go on a quest to fulfill the life-price of the resurrected character - so you complicate the resurrections, but the PC being resurrected still gets to play their character in the adventure that saves their life.

  • @qwertyb18
    @qwertyb18 7 ปีที่แล้ว +3

    Revivify is a godsend to me. I love rpgs (video games) that have tough as nails encounters, and you can't have these experiences in a game that has perma-death. This allows me to have difficult and interesting mechanics that allows my players to learn the encounter and slowly win without worrying whether or not I'm going too easy on them.

  • @adamisforgiants6762
    @adamisforgiants6762 7 ปีที่แล้ว +61

    Well right at the beginning you solved it for me. My bad guys are getting resurrected now.

  • @JonHerzogArtist
    @JonHerzogArtist 7 ปีที่แล้ว +25

    A small thing I like to add is that a Raise Dead has to be cast at the place where the person died. It's simple but there was one fun detour where the heroes had to excavate a collapsed evil castle in order to get back to the ritual room where the victim was sacrificed.

    • @RexTenomous
      @RexTenomous 7 ปีที่แล้ว +7

      That's a fun house rule!

    • @pyroparagon8945
      @pyroparagon8945 7 ปีที่แล้ว +3

      Jonathan Herzog what do you do if the place where he died doesn't exist anymore? Such as a collapsed plane of existence? I suppose they are rightfully boned

    • @farflownfalcon1076
      @farflownfalcon1076 3 ปีที่แล้ว

      That's a great idea, just stolen for our own house rules.

  • @GameNubQuin
    @GameNubQuin 7 ปีที่แล้ว +17

    I really like the thing about the rarity of gems, that was something I never even considered.

  • @CrazyConnor2
    @CrazyConnor2 7 ปีที่แล้ว +14

    That intro was more WebMD than WebDM 😆

  • @twogamingbros2586
    @twogamingbros2586 6 ปีที่แล้ว +3

    I can't help but imagine on the opposite end of the spectrum where you have a secret dwarven kingdom that knows how o make synthetic diamonds and just create a utopia without the knowledge of anyone.

  • @_Carlos
    @_Carlos 5 ปีที่แล้ว +4

    I really like revivify, I had an NPC who was aware the party could do it bargain with a fallen party member for the release of a prisoner. It was beautiful because the party MIGHT have been able to beat the NPC but not within a minute.

  • @rowanash5378
    @rowanash5378 4 ปีที่แล้ว +2

    In regards to the diamond rarity discussion: I find that in my experiences, most players forget that any spell requires material components simply due to the logic, "Well I have my arcane/divine focus. Isn't that supposed to cover material component requirements?" Because they don't fully comprehend the line that says it only covers material components that aren't consumed and lack a GP cost.

  • @snarkmarx
    @snarkmarx 7 ปีที่แล้ว +9

    Wow, the thumbnails get more, and more glorious over time. Between Pruitt's charisma, Jim's musings, and Travis' editing and behind the scenes work, this is fast becoming a real powerhouse of a show.

  • @philgagnon275
    @philgagnon275 7 ปีที่แล้ว +10

    Had a rogue in my party go the assassin route when they hit level 3. Zentarim kept approaching her to join. After refusing them 3 times they paid a group of street urchins to ambush the party and target a party member till he was dead... after they defeated the Urchins one player was dead and the Zent cointact showed up with a Cleric of Bane offering a deal... His life back, for her joining. She joined and has been doing side jobs for them ever since... Party still has no idea they were set up.

    • @jimdavis141
      @jimdavis141 7 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      Phil Gagnon sounds like something a crime syndicate would do!

    • @alexanderchippel
      @alexanderchippel 5 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      Talk about railroading.

  • @CWayneMartin
    @CWayneMartin 5 ปีที่แล้ว +2

    I like the idea of having the party fighting a deadly encounter with the Grim Reaper/Raven Queen. Or even making an offering of another life. Heck, even serve as a champion for them, therefore making the character multiclass into a paladin/cleric/warlock

  • @Zombie8tHeart
    @Zombie8tHeart 7 ปีที่แล้ว +17

    Would you guys be able to do a video on flight? Things like air ship, flying carpets, and spells? Just trying to get an idea of what kinda of role it can play in a game

  • @Draeckon
    @Draeckon 7 ปีที่แล้ว +2

    "I hope the Zealot Barbarian makes it into Xanathar's..."
    Congrats, guys, you got your wish!

  • @zombiewithapulse
    @zombiewithapulse 7 ปีที่แล้ว +5

    Whoa, what an awesome episode! You guys have given me so many adventure hooks just from this one topic, like what happens when the world runs out of diamonds? Who gets the last diamond? Keep up the great work!

  • @destroyer8000
    @destroyer8000 7 ปีที่แล้ว +6

    Jim Davis is probably pretty excited, because Zealot did make it into Xanathar's Guide. :)

  • @EvelynNdenial
    @EvelynNdenial 4 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    character idea: a zealot barbarian that can be brought back so easy not because he has a god doing it or he's magic somehow. it's because the barbarian is a master at navigating the most byzantine of bureaucracies and at some point in their life they've gotten in contact with the bureaucracy of mount celestia and filled out the right paperwork to have his resurrections approved without having to pay the processing fees.

    • @an8strengthkobold360
      @an8strengthkobold360 2 ปีที่แล้ว

      Now I imagine a barbarian bullying death into letting him leave the after life.

  • @minload
    @minload 7 ปีที่แล้ว +18

    What if you have the opposite problem? Players that are so unattached to their characters that they try and switch out or kamikaze anytime they come up with a new idea?

    • @rcnrbn
      @rcnrbn 7 ปีที่แล้ว +7

      Death taxes often work well here, say, losing magic items or your gold in the bank if your character banks it. Or, even, threaten their progress with the story. If enough of the party wipes in a short period of time then there's no one left who really cares about their original goal or even knows what that goal was in the first place, a la ship of Theseus.

    • @keithwinget526
      @keithwinget526 7 ปีที่แล้ว +3

      My rule for this is when you create a new character, they can be half the level (rounded down) of your previous character plus two (not counting if they were level one or two when they died). So, after level four you begin losing levels for doing this. Yeah, you can end up with a fresh level twelve character after losing your level twenty character, but that's only if you: A) Didn't resurrect your original character. B) Let your level twenty character die. C) Made it to level twenty in the first place... Plus I make sure to imply to my players that playing a level twelve character in an epic-level game is not instantly perilous, and you can catch up in levels rather quickly.
      However, I must stress that I don't do this unless I'm DM-ing for a group that is actually prone to suicide-ing their characters. It's really not all that necessary in any other case.

    • @rcnrbn
      @rcnrbn 7 ปีที่แล้ว +4

      There's also nothing wrong with playing multiple parties, AD&D style. In one game I ran, as the players became bigger movers and shakers they would have mandatory downtime to represent the kinds of concerns that affect tier 2+ characters being less frequent, and while their 'mains' were acting on the world during downtime they would have lower level 'alts' to go do the adventuring. That way, if a player got bored of playing one character all the time they had an out without committing suicide or sunsetting that character to never return to the campaign.

    • @garrettdaly9893
      @garrettdaly9893 5 ปีที่แล้ว

      I makem roleplay it out so these characters stay within the world we play in. The cleric stayed in a town in need the wizard became an apprentice for a later villain the fighter became a sell sword for a local king the thief became a libertarian stealing scrolls and spell book and collecting past due fees and books. In this we can have and encounter and bring in someone or something new but we have a chance to see them agian.

    • @Adamantium93
      @Adamantium93 4 ปีที่แล้ว

      Just my two cents in case anyone is looking at this now: maybe then the "level 1-15 epic campaign" is the wrong style of game for them. Maybe they'll like something more akin to older editions where the game plays on the scale of modules which take 2-4 sessions to go through. Look at something like "Tales from the Yawning Portal" or just convert older editions. At the end of each module you can ask the players if they want to keep going with their current characters or roll new ones. Those that like their characters can bring them into the new campaign, while those who got bored can try new ideas. Over time, you can flesh out larger background storylines and connections between the modules that the players will notice, even if the characters won't.
      In the end, you may have something like this (combining Keep on the Borderlands, Village of Hommlet, Scourge of the Slavelords, Against the Giants, Descent into the Depths of the Earth, and Queen of the Demonweb Pits).
      - Players solve the problem at the Keep but, in the victory celebration, one of the revelers shares concerns about strange happenings in his home town of Hommlet.
      -Then we cut to Hommlet, where players with new characters investigate the cult and, at the moathouse, realize that the cult was a front for a band of slavers who are part of a much larger operation.
      -The local baron and his knights (the players) investigate this slaving ring and destroy them.
      -Giants, who were the ones buying the slaves, begin launching raids against the barony in retalliation, and so strike teams (1 for all the giants or 1 for each) are formed to take them down.
      -After destroying the final giant stronghold, a lone drow is captured who reveals that the drow have been manipulating the giants. A party is organized to go beneath the earth and destroy them.
      -At the end of that campaign, Lolth is accidentally released into the world, and so the good gods intervene and send avatars of their justice (PCs) to defeat the demonweb queen once and for all.
      That way, you have an adventure that can be played with the same characters, but has places where it is very easy to swap out for a new character with little justification. Limit their ability to roll new characters in the middle of modules unless there is an obvious place to do so (maybe keep an NPC or two with them as back-ups just in case).
      And if even that is too long a story for them, then just run one-shots.

  • @goose6752
    @goose6752 7 ปีที่แล้ว +4

    When the DM's solutions to Raise Dead is to make diamonds rare, the players solution to the DM is Fabricate (if I can turn some trees and hemp plants into a bridge, I can turn a lump of coal into a lump of diamond; making diamond is easy and cheap, where do you think all those industrial grade diamonds for oil drilling diamond tipped drill bits come from, we make them).
    I look at Revivify as like the doctor pulling out the shock paddles, "CLEAR!!"

    • @tideoftime
      @tideoftime 6 ปีที่แล้ว +3

      That's not how Fabricate works. It reshapes/reweaves materials, but it doesn't transmute them. "You convert raw materials into products of the same material." The coal could be reshaped/woven into what would normally be an impossible design/configuration, but it couldn't be transformed into a diamond, the same way the tree/hemp couldn't be transmuted into, say, oil for lamps or similar, via this spell. So yeah... unfortunately that wouldn't work.

  • @ImADogRuff
    @ImADogRuff 7 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Man, I love yall. You help expand on my ideas so perfectly.
    The next game I run, I believe one PC wants to be a cleric, and another warlock pact of raven queen. So I'm thinking, the cleric needs to go through the process of setting up the ritual and such. It'll cost quite a pretty penny, plus to carry that stuff around is brutal.
    The warlock, however, if they so choose to try and revive someone, they'll have to trade the dead soul for another whose time has come. Maybe a shitty town watch captain who's been beating up teens, maybe the jolly bar owner who always gave them a round for free.

  • @tyler58701
    @tyler58701 4 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    "Stuff a body full of snow to keep it fresh" lmao I wasn't expecting that.

  • @Geeko170
    @Geeko170 7 ปีที่แล้ว +29

    I like the idea of revivify is temporary. It is used in emergencies and thus only keeps the person alive for lets say a random number of days.

    • @JainZar1
      @JainZar1 6 ปีที่แล้ว

      Or make them temporary hitpoints, thus they can be dispelled and only lasting a minute per spelllevel or casterlevel. And describe how the character isn't really healed but revitalized by sacred/profane energy, still bleeding profusely and being on the brink of collapse.

  • @calebfoster604
    @calebfoster604 7 ปีที่แล้ว +2

    The opening was my favourite part, and I loved the rest of the video.

  • @Eldagusto
    @Eldagusto 7 ปีที่แล้ว +4

    I've seen a lot of RPG stuff on youtube, but you guys are hella premium! I love both your interactions!

  • @DanJMW
    @DanJMW 4 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    I think you could have been clearer on the point about NPCs with/without raise dead - you can "ban" it from NPCs while still allowing the PCs to learn it. The PCs are meant to be extraordinary.

  • @ReustersPlace
    @ReustersPlace 7 ปีที่แล้ว +4

    This episode is why I love you guys. Great discussion and ideas. Thank you

  • @AJ-kj1go
    @AJ-kj1go 7 ปีที่แล้ว +77

    Why does it look like a green screen now Producer-Nerd? Are left and right Nerd CGI?

    • @travisboles7769
      @travisboles7769 7 ปีที่แล้ว +19

      They do their own mo-cap.

    • @JoseRS1186
      @JoseRS1186 7 ปีที่แล้ว +54

      Andy Serkis is incredible as Pruitt. His best work since Cesar.

    • @HawkBarrington
      @HawkBarrington 6 ปีที่แล้ว

      It’s just the FoV on the Camera, I think it looks kinda cool.

    • @HawkBarrington
      @HawkBarrington 6 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      Err... DoF depth of Field. Whoops.

  • @FrumpybutSuperSmart
    @FrumpybutSuperSmart 7 ปีที่แล้ว +25

    The solution to Revivify is strick enforcement of time and 300 gp worth of powdered diamond. That, in my experience, isn't easy to achieve at 5th level. But maybe me and my DM are stingy.

    • @Bluecho4
      @Bluecho4 7 ปีที่แล้ว +5

      It might be that the only person with ready supply of diamonds is aware of why a bunch of adventurers would want some on short notice, and jacks up the price or applies additional non-monetary costs onto the bill. They know the party is on a time limit, and abuses that for all they're worth. So even just to get the materials, they might need to perform a favor for the supplier, which could be a whole other adventure or mission. Maybe they have to rush to do it before the time limit expires, or the supplier makes them sign a legally (and perhaps magically) binding contract before the material is forked over. Either way, the party can't just get their buddy raised without going to great lengths.

    • @LordOfDarkness8296
      @LordOfDarkness8296 7 ปีที่แล้ว +4

      Bluecho4 Thing is you have a one minute time limit to cast the revivify spell. Revivify is a spell you're casting in the middle of combat not five hours afterwards. You don't have time to do a quest for the merchant to get those diamonds you need when your party member just died and all you have is the revivify spell.

  • @daltonprather6649
    @daltonprather6649 7 ปีที่แล้ว +26

    my players would just be like
    "my character died? I need to do all that to bring him/her back? I will just make a new character. who is an exact twin of my first character."

    • @gerbie42
      @gerbie42 7 ปีที่แล้ว +5

      In these cases I've often seen it ruled that any new characters would start at a level lower than the character who died. This starts to hurt more when a higher level character dies (asuming you use XP for leveling).

    • @shino4242
      @shino4242 7 ปีที่แล้ว +4

      In a scenario of dying at, say, level 17 or something...then whats the point? sure if they survive a single encounter they'll gain several levels, they are now always going to be the weakest link by far. And, assuming it wasn't just a series of really unlucky rolls, the fact that they died at level 17 makes it seem unlikely they'd survive very often at lower level...may as well just have the player retire from that campaign at that point

    • @caseyhudson4929
      @caseyhudson4929 7 ปีที่แล้ว

      Yeah, a twin that doesn't have all the magical gear as the dead one, sure.

  • @eronan03
    @eronan03 7 ปีที่แล้ว +2

    OOH, good call referencing Jonathan Strange and Mister Norrell. I always saw them as Wizard vs Sorcerer. One's the lifelong book-learner. The other's the intuitive magic user. You definitely see that when he places the note into the mirror without knowing how he's going to get it back.
    The way Strange "intuits" the next step without knowing the inverse is incredible.

    • @jimdavis141
      @jimdavis141 7 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      Yep. Just Eric agreed. I feel like Norrell could be a tomelock but I like the wiz/sor interpretation better.

  • @vermillionwraith7810
    @vermillionwraith7810 7 ปีที่แล้ว

    What I do for deaths in games is a malfunction table that gets rolled when they get brought back with effects ranging from needing to consuming magic items for survival to having a second personality that competes for control of the body.

  • @Minekatt3
    @Minekatt3 7 ปีที่แล้ว +2

    How fitting that I would have just been resurrected this Monday... Rip my halfling bard. Hello Half Orc Bard

  • @Malkor13
    @Malkor13 7 ปีที่แล้ว +4

    Has anybody considered having only one death saving throw failure disappear after a long rest or even a week or month? Perhaps all Revivify does is take away one failed roll and give one success after they have failed all 3. Lower tier spells relating to stabilizing just suspend the death saving rolls for an hour or so.
    As mentioned in the great video, harsh requirements on the body and soul's condition as well as stricter material component requirements and perhaps needing to go to sacred places with guardians or ghosts trying to take the body. Take advantage of this with monsters mutilating or eating the body. People know you can rez and steal corpses or threaten you to revive Hitler or his in-game equivalent. Perhaps the player is revived 'successfully' and creates an entirely new character who possesses the body and pretends nothing has changed while they carry out a hidden agenda or just enjoy their second or third chance at life. (imagine the entire party slowly and secretly gets replaced by other spirits throughout the campaign and no one realizes it. Hilarious)
    There's also the harsh resting rules where a short rest is a 6 hour sleep + light activity for 2 hours and you need 5 or 7 days for a complete rest. Resource management becomes much more complex and rez spells can't be spammed daily and must be applied in a timely fashion.

  • @CWayneMartin
    @CWayneMartin 5 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Web MD tells you how you're dying.
    Web MD tells how to come back to life.

  • @mikegould6590
    @mikegould6590 7 ปีที่แล้ว

    Guys, I have been inspired by this video. Thank you very much for that.
    Resurrection/Raise Dead will now require: The "Soul Bag" of a Night Hag and the feather of a celestial (like an Angel, a Pegasus or a Coatl), or the holy item of some faith (the hand of St. Llwellyn, or the Sword of St. Nathaniel the Archon...etc.)
    Like it.
    EDIT: LOVE the Weyland Yutani shirt. "Building Better Worlds...then filling them with screams and xenomorphs...then nuking them..."

  • @Dyndrilliac
    @Dyndrilliac 6 ปีที่แล้ว

    One of the things I found incredibly awesome about the Path of the Zealot Barbarian subclass from Xanathar's Guide to Everything is relevant to this topic: at 3rd-level, they gain the ability to be resurrected without the spellcaster needing to have/consume expensive material components. I'm currently playing one who is 1st-level, but I look forward to be able to make suicide runs with few (if any) consequences later on in the game!
    EDIT: Of course, Jim mentions exactly this near the end at 25:42. Very thorough job, guys!

  • @tobender4ever
    @tobender4ever 7 ปีที่แล้ว

    Matt Mercer's rezz rules put the tension back in, even for revivify. They're elegant and I can't even find a change to make, and I change everything.

  • @GalacticCoach
    @GalacticCoach 7 ปีที่แล้ว +6

    One idea I always thought would be good for my world is a 'death police' of sorts. Resurrection magic works perfectly fine, but these guys will come after you if they find out. They think that trying to defy death is one of the worst of crimes, and that makes it so that as a DM you don't have to change the magic itself, but rather just change the context of the world.
    I mean, people are not fond of necromancy, so how is this different?
    And sometimes, you not only have to worry about the death police, but also that god you just angered.

    • @jimdavis141
      @jimdavis141 7 ปีที่แล้ว +4

      GalacticCoach there are monsters who might be against resurrected PCs as well.

    • @theformalmooshroom9147
      @theformalmooshroom9147 7 ปีที่แล้ว

      +GalacticCoach I really like that idea and some I'm going to steal it.

    • @jnbaker7422
      @jnbaker7422 5 ปีที่แล้ว

      The Raven Queen might literally have patrol ravens that seek out people who were resurrected.

  • @joshuatungate8130
    @joshuatungate8130 7 ปีที่แล้ว +7

    Another quality episode. You guys are the best D&D TH-cam channel!

  • @freespam9236
    @freespam9236 7 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    21:08 Kingsman will come for me? Hell yea, where do i sing up for that game?

  • @LordSplendid
    @LordSplendid 7 ปีที่แล้ว

    Good video, lots of great points (like thinking about the diamond economy). One way to make resurrection spells a big deal is to require the sacrifice of a similar creature - sacrifice a human to resurrect a human, sacrifice a dwarf to resurrect a dwarf, sacrifice a horse to resurrect a horse. This mean in a sense that you not so much bring dead people back to life as changing who is dead. There is so many roleplaying opportunities and plot hooks that could be crafted from this. A murderer gets caught and is sentenced to be the sacrifice to resurrect a victim, but which victim? One PC might sacrifice himself to resurrect a loved one. Some woodelves might want help to capture an evil dark elf... to resurrect a deceased member of the tribe, it turns out.

  • @erezamir7218
    @erezamir7218 7 ปีที่แล้ว

    I think that Matthew Mercer's resurrection system is really something that everyone should consider if they want to run a game where PC death carries weight.

  • @skelitonking117
    @skelitonking117 7 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    All your videos are sooo beautiful; Being in one of your campaigns is on my Bucket list, The way you talk about the game almost sounds like music. You sound like you REALLY care about the game and i think that’s really important; Thank you for helping to make every Wednesday as good as it can be 👍

  • @DrPotatoPerson
    @DrPotatoPerson 7 ปีที่แล้ว

    The anime overlord, which draws heavily from dnd type systems, presents a world where 6th level magic is thought to be the highest level magic achievable by mortals, which makes it quite entertaining when the 20th level caster encounters someone who thinks their minions are unkillable because they are immune to 6th level and lower magic, so she drops a 7th level lightning bolt on it.

  • @VinceTenia
    @VinceTenia 7 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Now i feel the need to get a Feyland-Yuanti t-shirt. Thanks Pruitt.

  • @JudgeShadowfoot
    @JudgeShadowfoot 2 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    I am building out my BBEG who is either a Litch or someone with a powerful necromancer under his employ using soul jar or clone. He is secretly sending out the minor bosses to create chaos and conflict throughout the realm in order to then step in as the Leader of a mighty nation and offer help under the promise of those people joining his empire. This "emperor" has extended his life multiple times and has now drawn the attention of the inevitables and a Marut is coming for him. Hence the reason he wants to grow his empire and armies to help fend off the mighty being.

  • @kevinchristiansen4348
    @kevinchristiansen4348 5 ปีที่แล้ว

    The way to defeat a team that's resurrection heavy is to create traps that destroy bodies, enemies that swallow whole, restrict gem sales or bump up the price, make diamonds a quest to get, etc

  • @TheThundertwig
    @TheThundertwig 7 ปีที่แล้ว

    I think revivify is a nice addition because it inspires gameplay elements in its own. The party will want some diamonds so they can cast it, so you can integrate that was part of a larger adventure. Additionally, there are lots of ways that revivify becomes an unsavoury option. It can't reverse major damage like a missing hand, and so characters ressurected quick and dirty by a revivify may still be gravely wounded until an even more powerful healing spell is applied to them.
    On the flip side, this is a tool that can be employed by low-level baddies. It seems like an exciting encounter to face an evil cleric in an early game, and they keeps bringing back their body guards.

  • @isaacpromislow4928
    @isaacpromislow4928 7 ปีที่แล้ว +8

    help web dm i can't get my player characters up

  • @Licjr
    @Licjr 7 ปีที่แล้ว +3

    I like the idea of the person being resurrected having to make a Wisdom save or have some form of indefinite madness, and the DC increases each time you're brought back. So maybe your character comes back, but now they only speak Celestial, and they need to spend downtime relearning their old languages. Until then, hopefully someone else knows Celestial, or you won't be able to communicate effectively with the rest of the party

  • @elricengquist9989
    @elricengquist9989 7 ปีที่แล้ว

    I actually always loved the idea of using a lovecraftian style concept for a setting, and making death more of a measure of difficulty. Such as that the world in the past had a set of magical veils applied of it, which causes living beings to perceive the world differently than it actually is. Now you could do it that there are ways of piercing/lifting these sets of veils to see the world as it truly is, and that death or returning from death is one such method. In this way you return from the dead an you might find the world around you is different more an more as you come back, maybe the monsters of the world change as their true natures are revealed (making them much harder and more dangerous), and even that lifting the veils might reveal creatures hidden behind it that notice you now (even that if you go to far the great old ones notice you an might try and devour you making it a true death no coming back).

  • @thepopemichael
    @thepopemichael 4 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    If you're giving your players enough 300gp diamonds at 5th level for them to play wack-a-mole, then there are other issues involved

  • @tommurphy3786
    @tommurphy3786 7 ปีที่แล้ว

    I like the idea Age of Sigmarhas for the Stormcast Eternals; each time one dies, its essence is drawn back up, and reforged into a new body. But each time this happens, memories and personality are lost until the Eternal is little more than a robot. Might discourage players from even wanting multiple resurrection - the first time gives you a weird quirk, but the third time might leave you basically a robot.

  • @cinammonstyx7622
    @cinammonstyx7622 6 ปีที่แล้ว

    I love that whenever I look up your videos TH-cam tries to see if I want to watch web md instead.

  • @CarnivorousMeat
    @CarnivorousMeat 7 ปีที่แล้ว

    We had a group who had a player die and the plan was to get them a Rez. They were knee-deep in a dungeon and didn't want to drag the body around everywhere so they cut off a finger to have the spell cast upon the finger. When the time came - the spell was cast on the finger, but the DM had the magic trigger on the main body of the finger's person (the majority of the available body). I think it would have been played out different if the finger was the only part remaining, but ... The player woke up (still knee-deep in a dungeon - and now alone) with a nubby finger that was regenerating.

  • @sk8rdman
    @sk8rdman 4 ปีที่แล้ว

    One of the philosophies I use to help justify resurrection magic from a world building perspective comes from the fact that the soul has to be willing in order for the spell to work. Couple that with the fact that if you've died and your soul feels the call to come back to the realm of the willing, you don't necessarily know who is trying to bring you back. If you died at the hands of the enemy, then it could very well be them bringing you back to torture and interrogate you. For this reason many important figures in war will likely swear oaths that they will not accept resurrection magic if they die behind enemy lines.
    We've had a situation before where the party was supposed to capture and bring back an important enemy NPC alive. They failed in that quest, and brought back his corpse, hoping that the powerful figures who had given them the quest would at least be able to resurrect him. It didn't work. It also didn't help that they had cut of his head and sold it to an illithid, but that's a whole other thing.
    The same goes for the PCs. If one or more PCs die in a fight against a powerful enemy, then choosing to answer the call when someone tries to draw them back from the afterlife comes with a risk. It could be the enemy trying to bring them back, with a fate worse than death awaiting them on the other side. NPCs have warned them of this risk when sending them out on dangerous quests. To prevent them from metagaming this system don't ask them if their soul is willing when the spell is cast. Instead ask them when they die if they are going to accept resurrection magic, knowing only the circumstances of their death. Maybe ask them again after 10 days, since by then the circumstances of what magic is capable of bringing them back can change, but they still won't know for sure who is calling their soul back.
    Then I suppose there's also the possibility that people in the world could take out some sort of life insurance policy with temples. Pay them enough money for the cost of the spell plus some extra for the additional service. Then if you die and your body is brought to them, the spell has already been paid for. A more premium service might involve something like cutting your finger off and giving it to a druid before you go off on some dangerous quest. Make an arrangement so that if you don't come back in 10 days, that they are to cast reincarnate on the finger to try to bring you back. There's probably also something to be said for having a cleric cast sending to contact you once every 10 days, or once a year, or something like that. If the sending spell fails, assume that it means you're dead and cast true resurrection to bring you back. These are ways to get around the problem of a TPK where there's nobody left to take your body back to the temple.

  • @tomsawyerpiper9412
    @tomsawyerpiper9412 7 ปีที่แล้ว

    I like the idea of a resurrection quest. Someone dies, now you have to find a tome of raise dead and maybe you have to fight a necromancer to obtain it. Or diamonds are extremely rare and the only way to find one in loot is to slay a crystal dragon.

  • @jf3274
    @jf3274 4 ปีที่แล้ว

    This was SUCH a helpful discussion. Thank you, guys. Really appreciate the deep dives into these interesting topics 👌🏻

  • @michaelmorey3110
    @michaelmorey3110 6 ปีที่แล้ว

    I liked the repercussions from 3.5 and earlier..."Upon completion of the spell, the creature is immediately restored to full hit points, vigor, and health, with no loss of prepared spells. However, the subject loses one level, or 2 points of Constitution if the subject was 1st level. (If this reduction would bring its Con to 0 or lower, it can’t be resurrected). This level loss or Constitution loss cannot be repaired by any means."

  • @jessep3571
    @jessep3571 7 ปีที่แล้ว +5

    As a player, I do complain bout resurrection magic. It's part of my broader complaints that 5e is trying to be way too easy in order not to upset people. Combat can be challenging early on but not much later. Survival is pretty much out cause there's so many spells that make it too easy. Finding food? Outlander, Create Food and Water etc all make the process kind of unsatisfying in many respects.

  • @skajik8
    @skajik8 7 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    That was definitely your best intro

  • @SinerAthin
    @SinerAthin 7 ปีที่แล้ว

    One thing to keep in mind is that if you create a setting where 6+ spell level casters are rare or even absent then it might be difficult to challenge players once they get high level, as you won't really have that many NPC spellcasters available to challenge them.
    If you are playing with a typical DND setting though, one trick is to use resurrection magic against the PCs as well.
    Just as players have access to resurrection magic, so too does my NPCs, which means that killing important villains require big measures!
    In DND, the only way to make sure you've destroyed someone is to destroy their very soul.

  • @gpaulsen1
    @gpaulsen1 7 ปีที่แล้ว +2

    For a while, one person in my D&D group died at-least once, one time twice, every week. He just made a new character every time.

  • @andrewbacon4001
    @andrewbacon4001 6 ปีที่แล้ว

    I love this intro😂😂😂. Jim’s reassurance to Pruitt claiming it’s nothing to be a shamed of is great😂

  • @godqueenbidoof
    @godqueenbidoof 7 ปีที่แล้ว

    I like to require mummification for resurrection spells. Keeping the corpse "Fresh" and also making it a ritual that needs someone very skilled at something very specific

  • @dinosaurclub
    @dinosaurclub 7 ปีที่แล้ว

    Was really hoping you'd give ideas and suggestions for the dead players and what they can do at the table while their characters are dead waiting for these resurrections.

  • @alexanderchippel
    @alexanderchippel 5 ปีที่แล้ว +2

    I think a lot of players are perfectly fine with their characters dying. The problem is that they don't die how we want them to.

  • @wafl7212
    @wafl7212 7 ปีที่แล้ว

    One aspect of resurrection magic that would be cool to analyze is how it impacts assassination attempts. While low class hitmen might operate in much the same way as always, political assassins might have to go the extra mile with elaborate, detailed rituals for preventing revivals. That could involve mutilating or dispersing the target's vitals (perhaps the heart is required for a ritual), capturing them alive for soul banishments, or taking a curse specialist along to make sure that whatever they kill stays dead.

    • @jimdavis141
      @jimdavis141 7 ปีที่แล้ว

      ZeLuftewaffle very good points and worth considering for your plots and schemes!

  • @lifetake3103
    @lifetake3103 7 ปีที่แล้ว

    How my Dm has dealt with this idea is one time we are in a mass war setting. WW1 dnd edition basically. Reviving another player or character requires time and vocalization and the enemy isn't just gonna let that slide once they hear you.

  • @farflownfalcon1076
    @farflownfalcon1076 3 ปีที่แล้ว

    Web DM - you folks always knock it out of the park!
    We've just put together the house rules for our own 5e campaign:
    Bringing characters back from the dead is more challenging in this campaign. On the whole, spells that raise, reincarnate, resurrect, regenerate and remove curses and diseases are not available to player characters. They exist in the world, but only in the hands of powerful priests, druids and magical creatures. Should adventurers be slain, or succumb to a curse or disease, they will need to seek such beings for aid, which is unlikely to be granted freely.
    Do not expect characters that return from the dead to come back unmarked by their death.
    Magical scribes inscribed with these spells may also be discovered on the course of their adventures, and innate resistances to certain negative effects (such as those possessed by paladins and monks) are retained.
    Spells
    • Lesser Restoration (2nd level) - available to the PCs, but cannot be used to remove a disease.
    • Greater Restoration (5th level) - available to the PCs, but cannot be used to remove the effect of a curse or petrification.
    • Raise Dead (5th level) - unavailable to the PCs. The spell must be cast at the place where the character was slain. In addition, a raised character loses 1 point of Constitution permanently.
    • Regenerate (7th level) - unavailable to the PCs.
    • Reincarnate (5th level) - unavailable to the PCs. Furthermore, reincarnation magic may not necessarily bring a PC back in a humanoid form (see the AD&D) version of the spell. The DM will create a tailor-made 1d12 resurrection table for the player to roll on.
    • Remove Curse (3rd level) - unavailable to the PCs.
    • Resurrection (7th level) - unavailable to the PCs.
    • Revivify (3rd level) - available to the PCs. In addition, a revived character loses 1 point of Constitution permanently.
    • Spare the Dying (cantrip) - available to the PCs.
    • True Resurrection (9th level) - available to the PCs, but each character can only cast the spell once in their lifetime. Furthermore, the caster ages 1d20 years.
    • Wish - can be used to duplicate the effects of healing and restorative magic normally.
    Paladin’s Lay on Hands: Paladins can use the lay on hands ability to cure disease. They must expend 10 hit points from their pool (rather than 5) to cure a disease.

  • @killianduggan8730
    @killianduggan8730 7 ปีที่แล้ว

    I spent 3 months building and play testing a full lvl 1-20 homebrew class with a full character backstory for my long running campaign only to have him die on the 2nd session. I was sad at the time but next session I was right back to having fun as a Dwarven VanHelsing. Roll with the punches and have fun with it.

  • @An34syT4rg3t
    @An34syT4rg3t 7 ปีที่แล้ว

    My current campaign is set in the Star Wars universe (because I'm a huge nerd)
    In this world Dark Adepts (a converted version of a evil sorcerer) are insanely rare and their magic is forbidden, yet the are the only ones with resurrection spells and the cost is a lightsaber crystal instead of a diamond, along with a ritual.

  • @93lozfan
    @93lozfan 6 ปีที่แล้ว

    i once made resurrection part of a player's personal side story. his back story involved murdering someone in cold blood for revenge and then at level 5 that person is alive in a different town across the country. i had that person revived and then he moved away to avoid the confusion of being back (also the npc wanted to frame the player and keep him exiled). it was a fun side story.

  • @dionmager1068
    @dionmager1068 6 ปีที่แล้ว

    In a world of mine there are 3 gods of death that are all brothers and all of them have a different personality. Upon dying you meet one of them and if you've done a favor for them or they have a task they think you can accomplish for you to acomish, they can give you new chance or you can make a bargain in role-playing

  • @danielbrillat8793
    @danielbrillat8793 5 ปีที่แล้ว

    Hey guys. Just wanted to say thanks for the great discussion and some excellent ideas on how to handle resurrection magic.

  • @freddymcfred17
    @freddymcfred17 7 ปีที่แล้ว +3

    Another great example you could draw from is Full Metal Alchemist. When they try to bring someone back from the dead, depending on their skill level the "caster(s)" end up losing various body parts or even entire bodies. Maybe make the person casting the spell make a spell casting check of some sort with a risk of losing a body part, organ, a sense etc if they fail.
    I really like the idea of the zealot barbarian too. I feel like if you're ever DMing for a zealot barbarian, that guy really needs to devote his life to fighting for his god. If he dies and gets resurrected multiple times without performing any holy missions in the mean time, his god should contact him in the void while he's waiting to come back and let him know that this is the last time he's getting it for free if he doesn't get back to fulfilling his side of the deal. He then has to take on some quest that specifically involves thwarting the enemies of his god or else the next time he dies the cleric is paying the regular cost for him. Of course it'll be the DM's job to make sure he receives regular missions.

  • @MainlyMortal
    @MainlyMortal 7 ปีที่แล้ว

    in my campaign i made coming back from the dead a horribly traumatic experience that fucks you up for a long time

  • @Pijetlo91
    @Pijetlo91 5 ปีที่แล้ว

    I love the idea that most of these spells are in the necromancy school which could easily be banned from the civilized world because casting necromancy spells is a bad omen and sort of invites more evil and undead to that location. And so it would be hard even for nobles to be revived on a day to day base - they have to know a certain someone who has connection to some cultists etc. but since they are on the other side of law, doing business with them is always tricky and the price is more than bargained for.

  • @ArthWoW
    @ArthWoW 7 ปีที่แล้ว

    Nice video, per usual. I like some of the ideas to make res. magic a journey for the players, with negotiating prices, doing favors in return, and locating a priest to handle it. Makes it more thematic overall. For my current campaign, I borrowed an idea from Critical Role and give a DC for a res. spell to work. The caster rolls a D20 and adds their spellcasting modifier. The DC starts at 10 and each time a character dies, the DC increases for them. My players are cool with it, because they see how res. spells could break the game and they want the stakes to remain high.

  • @sanctusservus4714
    @sanctusservus4714 7 ปีที่แล้ว

    On the topic of Revivify, I'm personally fine with it. I see Revivify as a fantasy version of a defibulator because they both fill the same role from a story and concept perspective. In our world most first responders (usually) carry or have access to a defibulator so if the situation calls for it (like being dead), they can quickly use before it's too late. So in a d&d fantasy if their are clerics who are always on standby or something like that, they can quickly go the "deceased" and revive them or prevent their soul from leaving or however you want to flavor it.

  • @SinerAthin
    @SinerAthin 7 ปีที่แล้ว

    The most fun part of resurrection magic is turning it against the players.

  • @DrJest17
    @DrJest17 7 ปีที่แล้ว

    I've been reading the Vlad Taltos books and Brust has a cool approach. Resurrection is commonplace if you can afford it or if you're working for someone who can. However, certain injuries to the head or spine can make it so you can't come back. There's also a class of weapons that will destroy your soul, so you can't come back or even reincarnate if you're killed with one. And there are spells to keep someone from being raised, so you may have to find a wizard and make them drop the effect. Depending on the extent of damage and the time spent dead, the person performing the revivification (as it's called in the series) can have a very difficult time. These elements could be dropped into a game and work very nicely, I think.

  • @kevinchristiansen4348
    @kevinchristiansen4348 5 ปีที่แล้ว

    Basically how resurrection goes.. get high enough level you can be brought back because your team doesn't want to lose your high level party member for a new level 1

  • @TVlord5
    @TVlord5 7 ปีที่แล้ว

    Just had an idea that I'm totally going to be using is adding a loooong cast time for every single spell that taxes any time limits by adding a meditation period. Since you're appealing to a divine power to bring them back, then it might make sense for there to be a meditation required so that resurrection magic isn't used emotionally in the heat of the moment. You have to think "what does it mean to me and the world to bring a person back? Is this really a good idea?" And be very strict on where souls would go and who it might anger. Maybe that high-level PC was going to be a powerful soldier in some divine army after death that the god was prepping for and now they don't have their soul and they get a little pissed (really pissed if it was a character going to hell)

  • @sportsnut1473
    @sportsnut1473 7 ปีที่แล้ว

    When they talked about a place where you had to go to cast it made me think of the Lazarus pit in arrow and how that could be an interesting type of thing to put in a game

    • @sportsnut1473
      @sportsnut1473 7 ปีที่แล้ว

      Also I would make a table with some noticeable effects of resurrection some RP and some mechanical

  • @morum67
    @morum67 7 ปีที่แล้ว

    I just want to play a Zealot Barbarian who is introduced by having them mummified with "speak your noble quest and I shall join you" and then just punches his way out of his tomb ready to save the world all over again, slightly miffed that someone has dragged him out of Valhalla again!

  • @DungeonDad
    @DungeonDad 7 ปีที่แล้ว +51

    I think for a more hardcore D&D experience, revivify might be worth outright removing. However, if you do allow it in your game, and you want things to feel more dangerous, just put the players up against something that can create an antimagic zone in a small area (which can be placed on a dead body). You could even just give a bad guy an item that does this. Suddenly that massive crutch is gone, and the players have a huge problem to overcome.
    I'm also of the mind that coming back from the dead should be traumatic. Giving players quirks/scars/changes or handicaps when they come back from the dead can be a good way to make low level resurrections more interesting.
    I have a table which I roll on whenever someone comes back to life. Some of the consequences are cosmetic, like having one of your eyes go blind, or your skin is slightly more transparent. However you might have one of the spells you know swapped with another one, or two of your ability scores altered. Maybe your alignment or personality changes. I absolutely think there should be non-mechanical consequences for coming back from the dead.
    Using the madness table is a really legit idea.

    • @a7699aaa
      @a7699aaa 7 ปีที่แล้ว

      www.reddit.com/r/DnD/comments/3p9w7h/5e_revivify_thoughts/?st=j9rrp4kh&sh=537370b0

    • @Samilin4550
      @Samilin4550 7 ปีที่แล้ว

      As a DM and as a player the ease of survival in 5E is a problem. Since you have players taking bigger and bigger risks, with seemingly no consequences.

    • @longp94
      @longp94 7 ปีที่แล้ว +7

      Not sure why so many other DMs have such a problem with Revivify. It revives a creature that died within 1 minute with 1 hp. It can't revive someone who's died of old age nor does it restore body parts. It doesn't even heal wounds. All you need to do to make a character a valid target for say Raise Dead, but not Revivify is have enemies decapitate them. Intelligence IS an actual thing to think about when determining what enemies to throw at your players.

    • @TheFlashohol
      @TheFlashohol 7 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      Can't say I like the idea of arbitrary anti-magic. Severe injuries and special monster abilities are much easier to implement and are more plausible and/or interesting than anti-magic. It's also a hell of a lot easier to destroy a corpse with AoE and have the body gone or too damaged then risk potentially giving an anti-magic item to a party.

    • @gryffehondor4236
      @gryffehondor4236 7 ปีที่แล้ว +2

      Revivify is very limited tho.
      The mage can't find their diamond stash in the confusion (if they keep it in a pouch, make checks everytime they go to town to see if it gets stolen) ? Time up, can't revivify. 60s is short.
      Burnt by a fireball ? Dissolved in acid ? Decapitated ? Body not a valid target anymore. Need a bigger gun.

  • @Ex_Caseus_Fortis
    @Ex_Caseus_Fortis 7 ปีที่แล้ว

    In a horror campaign involving sanity I like to impose different rules regarding resurrection depending on the type, but the most basic is a penalty to sanity since death and the afterlife is quite traumatic.

  • @gorter23
    @gorter23 7 ปีที่แล้ว

    always liked the idea of 10th day adventists, a cult (hell)bent on reviving those who need reviving for their evil cause.
    regarding the spell components, it could be interesting as the dwarves and to some degree gnomes have an edge over accessing those over the other races
    it would be logical for a character who died due to a dragon to come back and have a fear of dragons (always fail fear saving throw) or a character who drowned might come back and have a fear of large bodies of water and never willingly enters a boat