This one seemed to be a lesson in King safety. Entering an endgame three pawns down (including 2 white passers!), King safety afforded Magnus the tempi to harass the white King and pick off pawns in the process, incredibly liquidating the two passers and going up by one pawn with the initiative.
Magnus' idea was to sack the a7 pawn, which at least allows him to regain control of the open file with Rd8. This would also come with tempo as white king has back-rank mate issues. Then after white reponds with a move like g3, black has some counterplay with Rd2 and a fork on f2 and b2. But Artemiev saw all of this, and just played g3 first, with the followup idea of meeting Rd8 with Qc3 where both of magnus' pieces would be hanging and he loses. At that point, magnus realised his mistake and tried to bail out with Qf3, seeking a perpetual check.
Not really strategic mastery. Slightly worse in the midgame, losing in the endgame, and then wins off of forcing blunders against a low time opponent. Classic Magnus with his rock solid endgame.
Strategic mastery? Not in this game, and you know it . Carlsen's own commentary gives the lie to your wild claim. I hope it was worth trying to fool us for the pittance TH-cam will pay for such small viewing figures.
@6:28 if he would've put Queen F5 he would attack the Rook and the 1 file, Rook takes pawn, Queen B1 Check, white is forced to block with Queen, Black Queen takes with Checkmate
clickbait There's no strategic mastery. Equal play, then Magnus blundered a bit and lost advantage, and then opponent got short on time and made mistakes.
![[Full Episode] MasterChef Junior Thailand มาสเตอร์เชฟ จูเนียร์ ประเทศไทย Season 3 Episode 1](http://i.ytimg.com/vi/Qs5zdBqLn_8/mqdefault.jpg)
Title: "Magnus Carlsen's strategic mastery".
Magnus: I'm just hoping for tricks at this point.
Very funny observation
😂
While giving a breakdown and making a video...
"this is probably a lost cause" ........ "Wow".
I love how every time magnus plays someone he has to explain his lore like he's a dark souls character
😂😂
what’s funny is i just came from playing elden ring and watching videos on it 😀
Hahahh😂
2:40 "So I'm thinking..." Well obviously, I was thinking the same thing actually... yeah.
I was pouring a beer at that time.. Jesus.
I was taking a shit
SO HE DOES THINKING ONE AT A TIME! I thought with his playing style, Magnus can see the future 😵💫
classic magnus effect. End game master, forcer of blunders
Anytime you have Magnus in a corner, he finds a way to make you feel the pressure as well 😂
Magnus is just so strong when time is of the essence - he is just fractions quicker
Mugsy Bogues is an NBA legend and one of the GOATs of basketball.
What a game!
Magnus: “I don’t know why he’s.. thinking..”
Magnus a kind day
It's funny how he took those 4 pawns at the end with the Queen
Rotelli speaks
This is why staying solid in low time matters. Keep your cool.
This one seemed to be a lesson in King safety. Entering an endgame three pawns down (including 2 white passers!), King safety afforded Magnus the tempi to harass the white King and pick off pawns in the process, incredibly liquidating the two passers and going up by one pawn with the initiative.
Can some please explain the move of black queen from E5 to F6, doesn’t it allow for the white to capture pond on A7?
Magnus' idea was to sack the a7 pawn, which at least allows him to regain control of the open file with Rd8. This would also come with tempo as white king has back-rank mate issues. Then after white reponds with a move like g3, black has some counterplay with Rd2 and a fork on f2 and b2.
But Artemiev saw all of this, and just played g3 first, with the followup idea of meeting Rd8 with Qc3 where both of magnus' pieces would be hanging and he loses.
At that point, magnus realised his mistake and tried to bail out with Qf3, seeking a perpetual check.
Not really strategic mastery. Slightly worse in the midgame, losing in the endgame, and then wins off of forcing blunders against a low time opponent. Classic Magnus with his rock solid endgame.
In classic hes different
I appreciate your video, it's really fun for me, not with your chess, but I always look at your face
More
Oof, opponent hates himself for losing that one
Magnus no play like that absoluty certain
Why wasn't 23. Rxa7?
Strategic mastery? Not in this game, and you know it .
Carlsen's own commentary gives the lie to your wild claim. I hope it was worth trying to fool us for the pittance TH-cam will pay for such small viewing figures.
@6:28 if he would've put Queen F5 he would attack the Rook and the 1 file, Rook takes pawn, Queen B1 Check, white is forced to block with Queen, Black Queen takes with Checkmate
They are not that dumb at that level
why didn't you go bh3 when queen was d5
what website is that
Should be chess24 back then b4 it was sold and shutdown. If it's chess24 then it's safe to conclude that these videos are supposedly 2 years old
@@zaidukazembe5140 thanks
The board sounds like chess24
Artemiev is so strooong
Hes a GM for a reason, i wanna Be strong like Him someday, So i can play with other Legend GM
What site Magnus Carlsen is playing on?
lichess
Could white bishop not have took pawn on H7 check, king captures bishop, and then white queen could take black queen?
He is real Magnus Carlsen ?
Gm
Now
I love how he draws arrows until it looks like a blob knowing full well simpleton like me have no idea how to follow this!
Lol i saw that his arrows would end up in him saving a knight protecting his undefended bishop at that point
That game was a draw the 3,000 player played like 1,500 rated player .😮
Couldnt handle the time pressure.
Cosmonaut america russia italy
No
entertaining game but strategic mastery? more like artemiev collapsing in time pressure in a winning position
This was actually a bad game for his level not a "Strategic Mastery"
clickbait
There's no strategic mastery. Equal play, then Magnus blundered a bit and lost advantage, and then opponent got short on time and made mistakes.
L take
Not a take, just objective facts.
where is the strategic mastery?
he was worse the entire game
so overrated
How can the best chess player to ever live be overrated
Idk if it bait or not but you definitely can't be serious
said by 900 elo
U are n00b …Artemiev just got obliterated.