🙏🙏🙏EXCELLENT KNOWLEDGE OF JUDICIARY & LAW SIR FAIZAN MUSTUFA SAAB🙏🙏🙏HOPE ALL THE LEARNED JUDGES/ADVOCATES & LAWERS READ THE JUDICIARY REPORTS & UNDERSTAND TO GIVE FAIR & LEGAL JUDGMENTS 🙏🙏🙏
Faizan sahab apko allah salamat rakhe ap jo law ke bare mein batate hein voh bilkul sahi hota h ❤aap doodh ka doodh aur pani ka pani karte hein salam h apko❤
Sir I think that apparently you are arguing the case in front Hon'able Supreme Court. This is unique way you have adopted to do lawful deed. I pray to Allah swt to bless you good health with longer life with faith. Ameen
कानून कितना भी अच्छा हो अगर उसका पालन करने वाले /करवाने वाले योग्य नहीं हैं तो कानून की धज्जियां उड़ना तय है जैसा कि संविधान निर्माता बाबा साहेब ने भी कहा था।जो हो रहा है इलाहाबाद के महान माननीय इसके खुले उदाहरण हैं और आश्चर्य नहीं कि उन्हें पारितोषिकों से सम्मानित भी किया जाए।
agar kisi ek samudai ko takleef dena ho to uske liye savidhan me change karne ki zarurat nahi hai, bus media, police, gov, aur court me aise logon ko baitha do jo us samudai se nafrat karta ho. media us samudai ke liye negative mahaul banayega, poilce uski sunegi nahi, court jayega to wahan uske khilaf faisla diya ayega. ab wo samudai kiya karega.
और समुदाय पत्थर हाथ में रखे और फेंके। जब समुदाय के पक्ष में कोई फैसला हो तो गप गप और जब समुदाय के विपक्ष में फैसला हो तो थू थू । समुदाय एक बार यह नहीं कह सकता कि जो हुआ वह गलत था । बाबर से मोहब्बत की जा रही है। देश की सीमाओं और देश के झंडे और संविधान से मोहब्बत नहीं। गाजा पट्टी और मुस्लिम मुल्कों में होने वाली घटनाओं का संपूर्ण विरोध मगर बंगला देश में होने वाली हिंदुओं के विरुद्ध होनेवाली घटनाओं पर कोई प्रतिक्रिया नहीं।बहुत खूब। बहुत हो चला अब देश के हो जाइए। पड़े लिखे फैजान साहब अलीगढ़ की शिक्षा के दबाव में कानून की धज्जियां उड़ा नासमझी में इजाफा करते। यही सच्चाई है इस समुदाय की ।फैजान साहब ओवैसी की जगह लेने के लिए तैयार।
1991 act kis samuday ko neecha dikhane ke liye banaya gya tha.. Or jo mandir tode gye the hamare unke bare kya vichar hai... Tum ek babari ke liye itna sb bol rahe ho... Yha to hajaro mandir hai.. Jo tute hai.. Hum kaise bhool jaye.
Thank you for the detailed video sir. You make great points/arguments and it certainly seems like the logical conclusion is that the Muslim side has a stonger case here. But in India today, decisions are no longer made on the basis of logic - they're made on the basis of the hindu faith and the Babri verdict was a clear example of this. So? Not much to expect from a Judiciary that's being filled with RSS and right-wing judges (by misuse of the collegium system) these days I guess? I feel like the right way to tackle this is for the muslims to protest peacefully and in large numbers together with secular people from all faiths/religions.
कोई चीज़ माने नहीं रखती sir जिसकी लाठी उसकी भैंस हर दौर मे यही रहा है कुछ कम या ज़्यादा जो fard या जो लोग या जो कम्युनिटी या जो देश अगर ताकत वर है तो वोह ख़ुशहाल थी और है और रहेगी सारा फोकस ताकत हासिल करने मे लोगों को लगानी चाहिए
Sir, you have come out with very valid legal points (as almost always). But, your last piece of advice i.e. keep faith in our (current) judicial process, is becoming more and more disgusting as revealed by a number of facts!😱
कोई भी नया कानून पुराने मामले में विवादलागू नहीं हो सकता और न ही पहले बने विवादित मामला नया कानून प्रभाव डाल सकता है.... पूजा सथल एक्ट कानून 1991 संविधान के अनुच्छेद 14 का पूरी तरह से उल्लंघन कर रहा है......
Of pressure the former cji buckled and gave a conflicting verdict so that the places of worship and shrines selectively of the Muslims to be contentious in the future. A judgemental blunder. So be it.
This Act of 1991 is very clear as explained by Faizan sir then why CJI Chandrachud in the case of Gyanvapi mosque allowed to survey the mosque ? That order opened the doors of other cases of mosques. That was very unfortunate.
Faizan sab You have good knowledge of law. Making video on TH-cam is not enough. Do something in practical to stop under every masjid and dargah is temple. I hope you will.
Janab Faizan Mustfa sahab aap khud kiun nahi Suprim court me bahes karte hain jis tarah se aap Low ko jante hain aur samjhate hain usi tarah se court me rakhen
I think the bench consisting of three justices is to hear the bunch of writ petitions challenging the Constitutionality of the religious places (special provisions)worship Act 1991 should be referred to larger bench of more than five justices in view of the judgement in Babri Masjid case by a bench of five justices recognising the validity and importance of the said Act. 😞😞😞
कितना भी चिल्लम चिल्ला करो यह तो मानना पड़ेगा कि इसी देश में धर्म के नाम पर कितना जुर्म हुआ है | आजादी के बाद मुसलमान को पाकिस्तान मिला और हिन्दू को क्या मिला | धर्मनिरपेक्षता के नाम पर झुनझुना | न्याय कोई नहीं करेगा तो समय तो न्याय जरूर करेगा | इंतज़ार करो न्याय जरूर होगा
Just need a healthy discussion between religious leaders on why Vedas doesn't justify idols let alone temples gir worship, unlike Qur'an which allows Mosques for worship
Sir, Very threadbare analysis of places of worship act. Further, I request u to make it clear whether places of worship act apply on Waqf Board or not, If yes, Why Waqf Board claims century old temples.
I hope you have to make an episode if a judge writes his judgment in discussion with his God , he worships, on that situation is there can power to relax of law can be applied or not?
Aap pehle a batao ki dharm ko pakadke avitak konsa community sabse pichhe hai? Madrasa education kya modernization ko badhaba de raha hai? Dharm ke hi nam par pakistan, Bangladesh le liya, kashmiri hinduo ka genocide hua ab hum apna cultural heritage ke liye court vi na jaye? Ram mandir banane ke liye 500 sal lag gaye ahi hai bhaichara?
Sirji, Waqf board has issued many acquiring notices to Hindu temples and Hindu peasants land. It will be contested at waqf tribunals. But by that time the decision will come the poor peasants are now barred to sell the land when he is in need of money than he has to wait for several years. Make video on that too.
ये भी बता देते बड़े मियां कि ASI संरक्षित स्थलों पर माइनॉरिटी को कब्जा करने का भी अधिकार है। ज्यों ज्यों उम्र बढ़ रही है बड़े मियां स्कॉलर कम और मुसलमान ज्यादा होते जा रहे हैं। Absolutely biased analysis.
Niyaay palika ki taakat ko kiya kahenge ki jis judiciary ke pass itni bhi jawaabdehi aur naitikta shesh nahi bachi hai khaastour par supreme Court of rulling parties and rulling government ke pass ki vo justice loya ke murder ka satya public ke saamne laa paane ki apni sanvedhanik jimmedaari nibhaane ke kaabil bhi nahi hai delhi ke siddhartha enclave near by aashram chowk ring road mein supreme Court of rulling parties and rulling government ki senior most advocate madam swarnna mahajan ji aur unki advocate beti ki hatya unhi ke flat mein hui thi but supreme Court ke chief justices ko yah nahi lagaa ki justice loya aur madam sawarnna mahajan ji maa beti ke murders ki CBI se investigation karaane ki naitikta to nibhate kiya aisi judiciary par garv karne ki gunjaaish bachti hai ?
Sir, Rahat Indori ka Ek ! Shair Lagay gi Aag 🔥 AaG tu 😅know reach DiP Southern state's karnataka's Srirangapatna's seat of Tipp's ( Jamia MasjiD) maintain bu Archeological Dept As Masjid E Aala.. too under Radar A fortnight Hanumangarh of MandyA for the Consequently..
Dharm ka influence kam karna he to pehle personal law definitely, wafq board , temples under state control , funding to religious school like mothersa these all polarised laws and systems should abolish, it can’t be one religion will have full influence in law and other will be secular .
@@mdiqbal68 Bilkul kia ja skta hai. POW is not in the basic structure of the Constitution. Almost everything can be changed by parliament. Even the preamble was changed..so this is just an ordinary law. The will of the people decides the course of a nation!
PREAMBLE OF CONSTITUTION CAN ONLY BE AMMENDED IN THE DIRECTION WHICH STRENGTHEN THE POSITIVITY OF IDEA OF INDIA WHICH JUST AND FAIR THATS WHY "SECULARISM" AND "SOCIALISM" HAD NOT BEEN REMOVED BECAUSE THESE WORDS GIVES A NOBLE AND ETHICAL BEAUTY AND FAIRNESS TO THE IDEA OF INDIA. @@Eps398
@@mdiqbal68 Don't belittle others' views. Counter them on the facts. I have given my views. Let's see your knowledge on the law. Explain why it can't be changed, as you said.
how can some one justify WAQF Board who can claim any land and properties no matter how old it is even if current ownership is before 1947. why should one group have all the fun is it called secularism?
I placed my comments on the video of Mr Faizan in social media as under: Sir, It appears that you wilfully decided to be prejudiced & biased, prima facie. Do you deserve to continue as VC, NLU which is a neutral statutory position?You are equating conversion of Mandirs by Moghuls with conversions of Buddhist monasteries into Mandirs. How many Buddist monasteries were converted into Mandirs? Are Monasteries & Mandirs really as different as Mandirs & Mosques are? You are speaking with the tone of religious zealotary which is least expected from an academician & an institution like VC. You are appearing as Babar's Advocates (a devil's Advocates). You are placing all your strength & stamina on the controversial Places of Worship Act,1992. You are placing your reliance on a legal position taken in 1872 by a Court at Chandausi & advocating for applicability of provisions of Resjudicata. Other than issue of applicability & practicality, it appears bizarre legal position.The way you are trying to articulate the Sambhal event/incident without a mention or condemnation of stone pelting, manifests that you are on the way to become a blindfolded Muslim political figure. You are trying to say that muslims Moghuls were peaceful in their conduct & had not resorted to destroying statues of Budha in Afghanistan. In your view, Babar is presented as the apostle of democracy. 😢 What is going to be the fate of Non muslim students in NLU, of which you are VC. Your in between comments on Courts & recent conducts of Chandausi Court is enmeshed & mired with controversies & tilted in favour of Muslims. Your attempt to place reliance on the archived Chandausi Court verdict aged 150 years ago is ridiculous & condemnable. Such videos are causing a question mark on your impartiality & apolitical stand. Why don't you accept the Babri Masjid verdict in toto? Why don't you donate Rs 100 /- only to start with, towards construction of a mosque at Ayodhya as a plot was ordered by the Supreme Court,to be given to muslims by the State Government? We understand the selective approach of Mr Faizan Mustafa? I suggest with all humility that you must not put your neck in controversial political issues till you are adorning the offices of VC.
Faizal Saheb , You are misinterpreting Civil Law 1908. "Res judicata is applicable in the Code of Civil Procedure (CPC) in India since the enactment of the CPC itself in 1908. The principle of res judicata is codified in Section 11 of the CPC, which states that no Court shall try any suit or issue in which the matter has already been directly and substantially in issue in a former suit between the same parties, and has been heard and finally decided by a competent Court. This principle aims to prevent the same issue from being litigated multiple times, ensuring finality and efficiency in judicial proceedings."बिना पढ़े लिखे शाहिद, बिलाल , शकील आदि आपसे बेतरतीब बात सुन रही हो रहे है । दुर्भाग्य है । आप acamedician हो कर रेड judicata कानून की गलत बयानी कर कानून खिलाफ कार्य कर गए है यह वीडियो यू ट्यूब से हटने लायक है क्योंकि गलत तथ्यों पर आधारित है ।
Amazing knowledge shared…. many thanks 🙏 may Allah swt bless you with more knowledge, wisdom, health, wealth, happiness, peace and strength…. Community should share all such videos for clear awareness, understanding and vision and also subscribe this channel for more information…. We are passing through a critical period, our youth have to play serious part in politics and law and understand the importance of our constitutional system, rights, freedom and liberty…..
1. हजारो साल पहले से भारत मुख्यत्वे हिंदू राष्ट्र रहा है फिर भी सभी इतर जाती धर्म के लोक ठे I सब कूछ कुशल मंगल था I 2. भारत की अबादी देखणे बाहेर के मोगल अक्रंता ओ की नजर पडी I उन्होंने भारत में आके सोशल, धार्मिक, आर्थिक 1500 साल अन्याय करते रहे I 3. फिर भारत के धर्म के आधार पे दो तुकडे करके मुस्लिम के लिये अलग देश बनाया I जब अगर सभी मुस्लिम अलग देश में स्थानांतरित होते तो हिंदू व गैर मुस्लिम लोगोंको सकुन का सूरज मिळता था I ऐसा हुवा नही और वहि पे सोशल गॅप निर्माण हुवा इससे दूर नही जा सकते I 4. भारत में मुस्लिम सम्राट राजायों ने हिंदुके मंदिर पे कब्जा किये इधर गॅप छुटे I 5. फिर मुस्लिम धर्जीने कानुन बने.....social injustice और अभी अलग अलग प्लॅटफॉर्म जितनी भी बहस हो रही है उससे 100% solution निकलेगे इसकी क्या गॅरंटी है I प्रश्न है की ज्या हिंदू राष्ट्र को मूळ सामाजिक स्तर पे वापस जानेके रस्ते खुल जानेके रास्ते खुल सकते हैं ????
Historical Wrongs cannot be corrected by Humans/ mortals. Legend::Achilles could never overtake the Tortoise (an amphibian). Places of Worship Act of 1991. History cannot be amended the way Laws are amended by mortals. Amit Shah foolishly said: now UCHIT sthan to Sardar Vallabh bhai patel etc. As against Nehru. After that concrete statue. Biography of an Incarnation Sripada Srivallabha 1320-1350 AD has to WAIT for 700 years / 7 centuries, due to the predicted (by Sripada Srivallabha) RULE of Mughals and Britishers. Of course the Incarnation was again available for Indians/ Hindus through the advent of Nrusimha Saraswati and Swami Samartha (full Incarnations) and some partial Amsa avatars in the mean time. And, and, present day muslims and present Christians whom RSS, BJP and Modi choose to dislike are the result of that 700 years / 7 centuries of HISTORY. No mortal can change that 700 years of History
Instead of going to all these processes like police, court, kachari etc etc, it is better that ruling dispensation bring a law in the Parliament stating that the will of majority community shall always prevail and minority's wishes will not be accepted. This will stop all fights between majority and minority once for all.
![KRK - ชนิสรา Ft.WanMai , N/A [Official MV] Prod. By Sakarin](http://i.ytimg.com/vi/C-WMwwYobcU/mqdefault.jpg)
Excellent analysis Sir thanks
🙏🙏🙏EXCELLENT KNOWLEDGE OF JUDICIARY & LAW SIR FAIZAN MUSTUFA SAAB🙏🙏🙏HOPE ALL THE LEARNED JUDGES/ADVOCATES & LAWERS READ THE JUDICIARY REPORTS & UNDERSTAND TO GIVE FAIR & LEGAL JUDGMENTS 🙏🙏🙏
Excellently described. Congratulations
इस कानून के हिसाब से तो संभल वाले जज को सजा होनी चाहिए
Ch..... sambhal maszid ASI protected monument hai.
Isliye saza Maszid committee ko hogi.
Faizan sahab apko allah salamat rakhe ap jo law ke bare mein batate hein voh bilkul sahi hota h ❤aap doodh ka doodh aur pani ka pani karte hein salam h apko❤
Excellent sir
Thank you so much
फैजान साहेब को सलाम।
Faizan saheb aaj kal sara qanoon tabah ho chuka hai
अब समझ में आया हजारों साल से गुलाम कैसें रहा भारत!❤❤❤❤❤❤❤
Excellent information explanation Thanks sir
Yah Hindu Muslim ki rajniti badhate ja rahi hai supreme court ko kadak nirnay Lena hoga 🙏😭
Kadak nirnay😀😃🤣🤗🙏
Bahut jankari dene kam desh hit hae AAP faezan sb desh ko sahi jankari dene ka shukriya
Appreciate, relevant, timely legal vetting (Constitutional).
Students/ Researchers, Officials' ink/ pen ✒can do needful, in the interest of Justice!
Pl
Thanks
This kind of contentious and conflicting issues should be closed forever by the esteemed supreme court so that harmony between communities prevails.
Give our temples back and it will be closed
Thank you so much. Indebted for your immense contribution
इलाहाबाद उच्च न्यायालय के जज यादव जैसी मानसिकत वाले लोग न्याय क्या करेंगे बाबरी मस्जिद मे भी न्याय नही हुआ
इस जज को बर्खास्त कर कड़ी से कड़ी सज़ा होनी चाहिए।
बेशर्म है यह जज।
न्यायपालिका पर एक कलंक है।
Good information sir , kindly keep continuing Your valuable knowledge towards india ❤🎉😂
Sir I think that apparently you are arguing the case in front Hon'able Supreme Court.
This is unique way you have adopted to do lawful deed.
I pray to Allah swt to bless you good health with longer life with faith.
Ameen
Cristal clear explanation.
Now table turn on Supreme court side
❤❤Thank you Sir Ji you only one I can Understand properly. I need you to Make more Clips Every other day .
कानून कितना भी अच्छा हो अगर उसका पालन करने वाले /करवाने वाले योग्य नहीं हैं तो कानून की धज्जियां उड़ना तय है जैसा कि संविधान निर्माता बाबा साहेब ने भी कहा था।जो हो रहा है इलाहाबाद के महान माननीय इसके खुले उदाहरण हैं और आश्चर्य नहीं कि उन्हें पारितोषिकों से सम्मानित भी किया जाए।
Dear sir Assalamualikum you are great personality
Great reading of the law
An excellent analysis of the said law
You are great 👍
agar kisi ek samudai ko takleef dena ho to uske liye savidhan me change karne ki zarurat nahi hai, bus media, police, gov, aur court me aise logon ko baitha do jo us samudai se nafrat karta ho. media us samudai ke liye negative mahaul banayega, poilce uski sunegi nahi, court jayega to wahan uske khilaf faisla diya ayega. ab wo samudai kiya karega.
और समुदाय पत्थर हाथ में रखे और फेंके। जब समुदाय के पक्ष में कोई फैसला हो तो गप गप और जब समुदाय के विपक्ष में फैसला हो तो थू थू । समुदाय एक बार यह नहीं कह सकता कि जो हुआ वह गलत था । बाबर से मोहब्बत की जा रही है। देश की सीमाओं और देश के झंडे और संविधान से मोहब्बत नहीं। गाजा पट्टी और मुस्लिम मुल्कों में होने वाली घटनाओं का संपूर्ण विरोध मगर बंगला देश में होने वाली हिंदुओं के विरुद्ध होनेवाली घटनाओं पर कोई प्रतिक्रिया नहीं।बहुत खूब। बहुत हो चला अब देश के हो जाइए। पड़े लिखे फैजान साहब अलीगढ़ की शिक्षा के दबाव में कानून की धज्जियां उड़ा नासमझी में इजाफा करते। यही सच्चाई है इस समुदाय की ।फैजान साहब ओवैसी की जगह लेने के लिए तैयार।
Hizrat kr jao Bhaai...sunnat v hai...aapke Prophet ne v kiya tha
@NikhilKumar-lp9bn thanks for your suggestion
1991 act kis samuday ko neecha dikhane ke liye banaya gya tha.. Or jo mandir tode gye the hamare unke bare kya vichar hai... Tum ek babari ke liye itna sb bol rahe ho... Yha to hajaro mandir hai.. Jo tute hai.. Hum kaise bhool jaye.
Thank you sir
Thank you for the detailed video sir. You make great points/arguments and it certainly seems like the logical conclusion is that the Muslim side has a stonger case here. But in India today, decisions are no longer made on the basis of logic - they're made on the basis of the hindu faith and the Babri verdict was a clear example of this. So? Not much to expect from a Judiciary that's being filled with RSS and right-wing judges (by misuse of the collegium system) these days I guess?
I feel like the right way to tackle this is for the muslims to protest peacefully and in large numbers together with secular people from all faiths/religions.
Thanks Faizan Mustafa for insight
Thought and knowledge sharing with us.your information is helpful for all community of people.
Salute you sir
कोई चीज़ माने नहीं रखती sir जिसकी लाठी उसकी भैंस हर दौर मे यही रहा है कुछ कम या ज़्यादा जो fard या जो लोग या जो कम्युनिटी या जो देश अगर ताकत वर है तो वोह ख़ुशहाल थी और है और रहेगी सारा फोकस ताकत हासिल करने मे लोगों को लगानी चाहिए
Thank u sir
Faizan Mustafa 5 ⭐
Sir, you have come out with very valid legal points (as almost always). But, your last piece of advice i.e. keep faith in our (current) judicial process, is becoming more and more disgusting as revealed by a number of facts!😱
कोई भी नया कानून पुराने मामले में विवादलागू नहीं हो सकता और न ही पहले बने विवादित मामला नया कानून प्रभाव डाल सकता है.... पूजा सथल एक्ट कानून 1991 संविधान के अनुच्छेद 14 का पूरी तरह से उल्लंघन कर रहा है......
Of pressure the former cji buckled and gave a conflicting verdict so that the places of worship and shrines selectively of the Muslims to be contentious in the future. A judgemental blunder. So be it.
This Act of 1991 is very clear as explained by Faizan sir then why CJI Chandrachud in the case of Gyanvapi mosque allowed to survey the mosque ? That order opened the doors of other cases of mosques. That was very unfortunate.
Sir ji 1991 act jo hai na sansad m bni bni or sansad m hi khatm hogi. Gold medal ki trah lahrate na firo
@
Yes this parliament can repeal this Act of 1991 but why it not repeal ? If it try to repeal, govt itself falls. Understand ?
खुदा है,ये सबको मालूम है,पर मान कौन रहा है उसकी और उसके कानून को ?
देश में संविधान तो है,लेकिन उसकी धज्जियां तो उच्च पदासीन लोग ही तार,तार कर रहे हैं।
Dear sir please भारतीय संविधान में अनुछेद 49 के बारे में जानकारी देने की मेहरबानी करे 🙏🙏 ये अनुच्छेद किस किस एक्ट पर भी लागू हो सकता है
Faizan sab
You have good knowledge of law.
Making video on TH-cam is not enough. Do something in practical to stop under every masjid and dargah is temple. I hope you will.
🙏
कानून केवल हिन्दूओं को पालन करना चाहिए❗
यही भारत का धर्मनिरपेक्षता है❗❗
😂😂😂
Hope next video on Allahbad judge hate speech ..
*Faizan Mushtafa*
Sub-section 3 of Section 4 of the Places of Worship Act,1991 should be repealed.
Janab Faizan Mustfa sahab aap khud kiun nahi Suprim court me bahes karte hain jis tarah se aap Low ko jante hain aur samjhate hain usi tarah se court me rakhen
If a lawyer can’t find the Places of Worship as one sided and it is draconian, I pity that person. Rotten
Janab shukria for enlighting us.
Bahut achcha❤
धर्म और राजनीति दोनों अलग अलग हैं ।
SIR WE THE PEOPLE OF INDIA RESPECT AND ACCEPT INDIAN CONSTITUTION BUT DIRTY POLITICS AND CORRECTION
Military ke baat ,agar kishn nahi hai mittray nahi c halata..🎉🎉
I think the bench consisting of three justices is to hear the bunch of writ petitions challenging the Constitutionality of the religious places (special provisions)worship Act 1991 should be referred to larger bench of more than five justices in view of the judgement in Babri Masjid case by a bench of five justices recognising the validity and importance of the said Act.
😞😞😞
कितना भी चिल्लम चिल्ला करो यह तो मानना पड़ेगा कि इसी देश में धर्म के नाम पर कितना जुर्म हुआ है | आजादी के बाद मुसलमान को पाकिस्तान मिला और हिन्दू को क्या मिला | धर्मनिरपेक्षता के नाम पर झुनझुना | न्याय कोई नहीं करेगा तो समय तो न्याय जरूर करेगा | इंतज़ार करो न्याय जरूर होगा
Aaj Hindumahsabha main chif justice allahabad ke ki taqreer par dr sahab
Sar Agar fir se Kisi justice ne Bhagwan ke samne baithkar Faisla liya tab kya hoga
Just need a healthy discussion between religious leaders on why Vedas doesn't justify idols let alone temples gir worship, unlike Qur'an which allows Mosques for worship
Sir, yours audio is poor pls adjust appropriate. Mashallah yours memory is from God gift. Zaheer. Jeddah.
Sir,
Very threadbare analysis of places of worship act.
Further, I request u to make it clear whether places of worship act apply on Waqf Board or not, If yes, Why Waqf Board claims century old temples.
Sir आवाज सही नहीं आ रही है। कृपया माइक पर ध्यान दीजिए🙏
संभल की जामा मस्जिद एएसआई द्वारा संरक्षित भवन है क्या इस पर पूजा स्थल अधिनियम 1991 के प्रावधान लागू होते हैं
I hope you have to make an episode if a judge writes his judgment in discussion with his God , he worships, on that situation is there can power to relax of law can be applied or not?
Aap pehle a batao ki dharm ko pakadke avitak konsa community sabse pichhe hai? Madrasa education kya modernization ko badhaba de raha hai? Dharm ke hi nam par pakistan, Bangladesh le liya, kashmiri hinduo ka genocide hua ab hum apna cultural heritage ke liye court vi na jaye? Ram mandir banane ke liye 500 sal lag gaye ahi hai bhaichara?
VC post holding does not mean that you dont comment n legal matters
Ilahabad high court ke judge Sekhar kumar Yadav ke barey mein video kijiye please!
Sirji,
Waqf board has issued many acquiring notices to Hindu temples and Hindu peasants land. It will be contested at waqf tribunals. But by that time the decision will come the poor peasants are now barred to sell the land when he is in need of money than he has to wait for several years.
Make video on that too.
Aap safsaf batadijye ki is samay jo horaha hai galat horaha hai zajen kanun ko nahi man rahe unhe bhi saja honichahiye
Please Sir Sound Quality Improve.❤
Later diye baat uska jawaab nahi araa sir
شكرية
Court pe bharosa nhi hai sir
🇮🇳🇮🇳🇮🇳👍👍👍🇮🇳🇮🇳🇮🇳🇮🇳
Sir, please advise whether the matter can be taken up with International Court of Justice, Vogue.
Ye kannon congress ne tustikaran ke lie banane hai.. ye hi du rashtra hai. Hinduo ka raaj hai,hume jaisa aacha lagega karenge
Ji
ये भी बता देते बड़े मियां कि ASI संरक्षित स्थलों पर माइनॉरिटी को कब्जा करने का भी अधिकार है। ज्यों ज्यों उम्र बढ़ रही है बड़े मियां स्कॉलर कम और मुसलमान ज्यादा होते जा रहे हैं। Absolutely biased analysis.
Kale chashme ka prayog hai. Sab kala hi nazar aayega.
@muhammadsalimshaikh8241 यही तो कह रहे हैं फैजान मियां से कि काला चश्मा उतारकर विवेचना किया करो।
Niyaay palika ki taakat ko kiya kahenge ki jis judiciary ke pass itni bhi jawaabdehi aur naitikta shesh nahi bachi hai khaastour par supreme Court of rulling parties and rulling government ke pass ki vo justice loya ke murder ka satya public ke saamne laa paane ki apni sanvedhanik jimmedaari nibhaane ke kaabil bhi nahi hai delhi ke siddhartha enclave near by aashram chowk ring road mein supreme Court of rulling parties and rulling government ki senior most advocate madam swarnna mahajan ji aur unki advocate beti ki hatya unhi ke flat mein hui thi but supreme Court ke chief justices ko yah nahi lagaa ki justice loya aur madam sawarnna mahajan ji maa beti ke murders ki CBI se investigation karaane ki naitikta to nibhate kiya aisi judiciary par garv karne ki gunjaaish bachti hai ?
Juge s.k yadav par sir video banayi
Sir,
Rahat Indori ka Ek !
Shair Lagay gi Aag 🔥 AaG tu 😅know reach DiP Southern state's karnataka's Srirangapatna's seat of Tipp's ( Jamia MasjiD) maintain bu Archeological Dept As
Masjid E Aala.. too under Radar A fortnight Hanumangarh of MandyA for the Consequently..
Lucknow
Dharm ka influence kam karna he to pehle personal law definitely, wafq board , temples under state control , funding to religious school like mothersa these all polarised laws and systems should abolish, it can’t be one religion will have full influence in law and other will be secular .
Kya 1991 me ab change Kiya ja sakta hai
Nahi kiya ja sakta.
@@mdiqbal68 Bilkul kia ja skta hai. POW is not in the basic structure of the Constitution. Almost everything can be changed by parliament. Even the preamble was changed..so this is just an ordinary law. The will of the people decides the course of a nation!
@@Eps398 What nonsense !! People without knowledge of law come here to make their stupid comments.
PREAMBLE OF CONSTITUTION CAN ONLY BE AMMENDED IN THE DIRECTION WHICH STRENGTHEN THE POSITIVITY OF IDEA OF INDIA WHICH JUST AND FAIR THATS WHY "SECULARISM" AND "SOCIALISM" HAD NOT BEEN REMOVED BECAUSE THESE WORDS GIVES A NOBLE AND ETHICAL BEAUTY AND FAIRNESS TO THE IDEA OF INDIA. @@Eps398
@@mdiqbal68 Don't belittle others' views. Counter them on the facts. I have given my views. Let's see your knowledge on the law. Explain why it can't be changed, as you said.
how can some one justify WAQF Board who can claim any land and properties no matter how old it is even if current ownership is before 1947. why should one group have all the fun is it called secularism?
Sir urdu ka thoda use rakhein aap bolne ham Jammu and Kashmir Wale proper hindi nahi smjte
wakeel sahab badesha me aur PM me kya farq hai
Anjam mere beta bati ki baad. Connect wire.
हमारे धर्मस्थल हमको दे ठाकुर.
Ye kannon hum nahi mante. Hum hindu majority main hai. Saare kanoon hum badal denge
I placed my comments on the video of Mr Faizan in social media as under: Sir, It appears that you wilfully decided to be prejudiced & biased, prima facie. Do you deserve to continue as VC, NLU which is a neutral statutory position?You are equating conversion of Mandirs by Moghuls with conversions of Buddhist monasteries into Mandirs. How many Buddist monasteries were converted into Mandirs? Are Monasteries & Mandirs really as different as Mandirs & Mosques are? You are speaking with the tone of religious zealotary which is least expected from an academician & an institution like VC. You are appearing as Babar's Advocates (a devil's Advocates). You are placing all your strength & stamina on the controversial Places of Worship Act,1992. You are placing your reliance on a legal position taken in 1872 by a Court at Chandausi & advocating for applicability of provisions of Resjudicata. Other than issue of applicability & practicality, it appears bizarre legal position.The way you are trying to articulate the Sambhal event/incident without a mention or condemnation of stone pelting, manifests that you are on the way to become a blindfolded Muslim political figure. You are trying to say that muslims Moghuls were peaceful in their conduct & had not resorted to destroying statues of Budha in Afghanistan. In your view, Babar is presented as the apostle of democracy. 😢 What is going to be the fate of Non muslim students in NLU, of which you are VC. Your in between comments on Courts & recent conducts of Chandausi Court is enmeshed & mired with controversies & tilted in favour of Muslims. Your attempt to place reliance on the archived Chandausi Court verdict aged 150 years ago is ridiculous & condemnable. Such videos are causing a question mark on your impartiality & apolitical stand. Why don't you accept the Babri Masjid verdict in toto? Why don't you donate Rs 100 /- only to start with, towards construction of a mosque at Ayodhya as a plot was ordered by the Supreme Court,to be given to muslims by the State Government? We understand the selective approach of Mr Faizan Mustafa? I suggest with all humility that you must not put your neck in controversial political issues till you are adorning the offices of VC.
Faizal Saheb , You are misinterpreting Civil Law 1908. "Res judicata is applicable in the Code of Civil Procedure (CPC) in India since the enactment of the CPC itself in 1908. The principle of res judicata is codified in Section 11 of the CPC, which states that no Court shall try any suit or issue in which the matter has already been directly and substantially in issue in a former suit between the same parties, and has been heard and finally decided by a competent Court. This principle aims to prevent the same issue from being litigated multiple times, ensuring finality and efficiency in judicial proceedings."बिना पढ़े लिखे शाहिद, बिलाल , शकील आदि आपसे बेतरतीब बात सुन रही हो रहे है । दुर्भाग्य है । आप acamedician हो कर रेड judicata कानून की गलत बयानी कर कानून खिलाफ कार्य कर गए है
यह वीडियो यू ट्यूब से हटने लायक है क्योंकि गलत तथ्यों पर आधारित है ।
Good job sir ❤❤❤
Shahbano Case के बारे में भी बोले
Sir Allahbad k judge kya Kathmulla bol sakte hain
Jihadi ko Jihadi ho bola jayega...aur Kathmulla ko Kathmulla.😅
Please Sir sound quality improve.
Amazing knowledge shared…. many thanks 🙏 may Allah swt bless you with more knowledge, wisdom, health, wealth, happiness, peace and strength…. Community should share all such videos for clear awareness, understanding and vision and also subscribe this channel for more information….
We are passing through a critical period, our youth have to play serious part in politics and law and understand the importance of our constitutional system, rights, freedom and liberty…..
1. हजारो साल पहले से भारत मुख्यत्वे हिंदू राष्ट्र रहा है फिर भी सभी इतर जाती धर्म के लोक ठे I सब कूछ कुशल मंगल था I
2. भारत की अबादी देखणे बाहेर के मोगल अक्रंता ओ की नजर पडी I उन्होंने भारत में आके सोशल, धार्मिक, आर्थिक 1500 साल अन्याय करते रहे I
3. फिर भारत के धर्म के आधार पे दो तुकडे करके मुस्लिम के लिये अलग देश बनाया I जब अगर सभी मुस्लिम अलग देश में स्थानांतरित होते तो हिंदू व गैर मुस्लिम लोगोंको सकुन का सूरज मिळता था I ऐसा हुवा नही और वहि पे सोशल गॅप निर्माण हुवा इससे दूर नही जा सकते I
4. भारत में मुस्लिम सम्राट राजायों ने हिंदुके मंदिर पे कब्जा किये इधर गॅप छुटे I
5. फिर मुस्लिम धर्जीने कानुन बने.....social injustice
और अभी अलग अलग प्लॅटफॉर्म जितनी भी बहस हो रही है उससे 100% solution निकलेगे इसकी क्या गॅरंटी है I
प्रश्न है की ज्या हिंदू राष्ट्र को मूळ सामाजिक स्तर पे वापस जानेके रस्ते खुल जानेके रास्ते खुल सकते हैं ????
Historical Wrongs cannot be corrected by Humans/ mortals.
Legend::Achilles could never overtake the Tortoise (an amphibian).
Places of Worship Act of 1991. History cannot be amended the way Laws are amended by mortals.
Amit Shah foolishly said: now UCHIT sthan to Sardar Vallabh bhai patel etc. As against Nehru. After that concrete statue.
Biography of an Incarnation Sripada Srivallabha 1320-1350 AD has to WAIT for 700 years / 7 centuries, due to the predicted (by Sripada Srivallabha) RULE of Mughals and Britishers. Of course the Incarnation was again available for Indians/ Hindus through the advent of Nrusimha Saraswati and Swami Samartha (full Incarnations) and some partial Amsa avatars in the mean time.
And, and, present day muslims and present Christians whom RSS, BJP and Modi choose to dislike are the result of that 700 years / 7 centuries of HISTORY.
No mortal can change that 700 years of History
Jo mandir kabjae gaye wo wapas lenge 40000. Chahe kitni kurbaani Deni pade .
Instead of going to all these processes like police, court, kachari etc etc, it is better that ruling dispensation bring a law in the Parliament stating that the will of majority community shall always prevail and minority's wishes will not be accepted. This will stop all fights between majority and minority once for all.
फैजान साहेब सरल हिन्दी में बताऐ