Bell's Theorem doesn't state locality is false, but rather local hidden variable theories are false. It's still valid to have locality theories but in turn it rejects realism, and vice versa. n.b. I am not saying I agree with the view of locality, but rather I see if as being perfectly possibly. One thing that always confused me is that if you know the entirety of the behaviour of the state of the system already, you have all the information already. The "spooky action at a distance" argument always seemed wrong to me. A classical example would be something like I have a total of £10.00 in my left and right pockets but don't know the distribution until I measure it. I look in my right pocket and see I have £6.71, which means I know I have £3.29 in my left pocket. I can then go and verify that by checking the left pocket to find the total (which should be £10.00). This is similar with quantum entanglement. If you know the entire wavefunction of the system, you can know what the other state bit is, but to verify that information, the verification cannot be faster than the speed of light. The weird bit I find here is the measurement itself (bringing two quantum systems together).
@@craig4320 Yes. Most people reject locality nowadays not because they support realism, but locality brings up a bunch of other issues. Side note: locality is not the same as local dynamics.
Would be very interesting to hear you expand on what non-locality might mean for causal reality. I have heard a suggestion that it being false disproves causal reality but I do understand how and my basic intuitions say causal reality is definitely real, but I may just not be understanding what some of the words used mean.
That is correct because the result of the measurement is "random"/unknown-beforehand. So it cannot be used to send any _useful_ information superluminal.
Relativity is an optical illusion. According to Relativity, two inertial moving observers will see each others space contract and time dilate. This is a complete contradiction and a physical impossibility if the effects are real. Objects and the passage of time can not be both small and large at the same time for the same observer. The only possible explanation is that the observed effects are an optical illusion. Any theory based on Special Relativity, such as General Relativity, must also have the same problem. Hi my name is Dr William Walker and I am a PhD physicist and have been investigating this topic for 30 years. It has been known since the late 1700s by Simone LaPlace that nearfield Gravity is instantaneous by analyzing the stability of the orbits of the planets about the sun. This is actually predicted by General Relativity by analyzing the propagating fields generated by an oscillating mass. In addition, General Relativity predicts that in the farfield Gravity propagates at the speed of light. The farfield speed of gravity was recently confirmed by LIGO. Recently it has been shown that light behaves in the same way by using Maxwell's equations to analyze the propagating fields generated my an oscillating charge. For more information search: William Walker Superluminal. This was experimentally confirmed by measuring radio waves propagating between 2 antennas and separating the antennas from the nearfield to the farfield, which occurs about 1 wavelength from the source. This behavior of gravity and light occurs not only for the phase and group speed, but also the information speed. This instantaneous nature of light and gravity near the source and been kept from the public and is not commonly known. The reason is that it shows that both Special Relativity and General Relativity are wrong! It can be easily shown that Instantaneous nearfield light yields Galilean Relativity and farfield light yields Einstein Relativity. This is because in the nearfield, gamma=1since c= infinity, and in the farfield, gamma= the Relativistic gamma since c= farfield speed of light. Since time and space are real, they can not depend on the frequency of light used. This is because c=wavelength x frequency, and 1 wavelength = c/frequency defines the nearfield from the farfield. Consequently Relativity is an optical illusion. Objects moving near the speed of light appear to contract in length and time appears to slow down, but it is just what you see using farfield light. Using nearfield light you will see that the object has not contracted and time has not changed. For more information: Search William Walker Relativity. Since General Relativity is based on Special Relativity, General Relativity must also be an optical illusion. Spacetime is flat and gravity must be a propagating field. Researchers have shown that in the weak field limit, which is what we only observe, General Relativity reduces to Gravitoelectromagnetism, which shows gravity can be modeled as 4 Maxwell equations similar in form to those for electromagnetic fields, yielding Electric and Magnetic components of gravity. This theory explains all gravitational effects as well as the instantaneous nearfield and speed of light farfield propagating fields. So gravity is a propagating field that can finally be quantized enabling the unification of gravity and quantum mechanics. The current interpretation if quantum mechanics makes no sense, involving particles that are not real until measured, and in a fuzzy superposition of states. On the other hand, the Pilot Wave interpretation of Quantum Mechanics makes makes much more sense, which says particles are always real with real positions and velocities. The particles also interact with an energetic quantum field that permeates all of space, forming a pilot wave that guides the particle. This simpler explainatiin explains all known quantum phenomena. The only problem is that the Pilot Wave is known to interact instantaneously with the particle and all other particles, and this is completely incompatible with Relativity, but is compatible with Galilean Relativity. So due to the evidence presented here, this is no longer a problem, and elevates the Pilot Interpretation to our best explanation of Quantum Mechanics TH-cam presentation of above argument: th-cam.com/video/sePdJ7vSQvQ/w-d-xo.html Paper it is based on: William D. Walker and Dag Stranneby, A New Interpretation of Relativity, 2023: vixra.org/abs/2309.0145
Bell's Theorem doesn't state locality is false, but rather local hidden variable theories are false. It's still valid to have locality theories but in turn it rejects realism, and vice versa.
n.b. I am not saying I agree with the view of locality, but rather I see if as being perfectly possibly.
One thing that always confused me is that if you know the entirety of the behaviour of the state of the system already, you have all the information already. The "spooky action at a distance" argument always seemed wrong to me.
A classical example would be something like I have a total of £10.00 in my left and right pockets but don't know the distribution until I measure it. I look in my right pocket and see I have £6.71, which means I know I have £3.29 in my left pocket. I can then go and verify that by checking the left pocket to find the total (which should be £10.00). This is similar with quantum entanglement. If you know the entire wavefunction of the system, you can know what the other state bit is, but to verify that information, the verification cannot be faster than the speed of light. The weird bit I find here is the measurement itself (bringing two quantum systems together).
A locality theory that rejects realism could be for example, superdeterminism?
@@craig4320 Yes. Most people reject locality nowadays not because they support realism, but locality brings up a bunch of other issues. Side note: locality is not the same as local dynamics.
Would be very interesting to hear you expand on what non-locality might mean for causal reality. I have heard a suggestion that it being false disproves causal reality but I do understand how and my basic intuitions say causal reality is definitely real, but I may just not be understanding what some of the words used mean.
Some have said that measuring entangled particles cannot be used to send an information signal faster than light. Do you agree?
That is correct because the result of the measurement is "random"/unknown-beforehand. So it cannot be used to send any _useful_ information superluminal.
it's based on an external observation using light. It can be done in quantum biology using phonons.
Relativity is an optical illusion. According to Relativity, two inertial moving observers will see each others space contract and time dilate. This is a complete contradiction and a physical impossibility if the effects are real. Objects and the passage of time can not be both small and large at the same time for the same observer. The only possible explanation is that the observed effects are an optical illusion. Any theory based on Special Relativity, such as General Relativity, must also have the same problem.
Hi my name is Dr William Walker and I am a PhD physicist and have been investigating this topic for 30 years. It has been known since the late 1700s by Simone LaPlace that nearfield Gravity is instantaneous by analyzing the stability of the orbits of the planets about the sun. This is actually predicted by General Relativity by analyzing the propagating fields generated by an oscillating mass. In addition, General Relativity predicts that in the farfield Gravity propagates at the speed of light. The farfield speed of gravity was recently confirmed by LIGO.
Recently it has been shown that light behaves in the same way by using Maxwell's equations to analyze the propagating fields generated my an oscillating charge. For more information search: William Walker Superluminal. This was experimentally confirmed by measuring radio waves propagating between 2 antennas and separating the antennas from the nearfield to the farfield, which occurs about 1 wavelength from the source. This behavior of gravity and light occurs not only for the phase and group speed, but also the information speed.
This instantaneous nature of light and gravity near the source and been kept from the public and is not commonly known. The reason is that it shows that both Special Relativity and General Relativity are wrong! It can be easily shown that Instantaneous nearfield light yields Galilean Relativity and farfield light yields Einstein Relativity. This is because in the nearfield, gamma=1since c= infinity, and in the farfield, gamma= the Relativistic gamma since c= farfield speed of light. Since time and space are real, they can not depend on the frequency of light used. This is because c=wavelength x frequency, and 1 wavelength = c/frequency defines the nearfield from the farfield. Consequently Relativity is an optical illusion. Objects moving near the speed of light appear to contract in length and time appears to slow down, but it is just what you see using farfield light. Using nearfield light you will see that the object has not contracted and time has not changed. For more information: Search William Walker Relativity.
Since General Relativity is based on Special Relativity, General Relativity must also be an optical illusion. Spacetime is flat and gravity must be a propagating field. Researchers have shown that in the weak field limit, which is what we only observe, General Relativity reduces to Gravitoelectromagnetism, which shows gravity can be modeled as 4 Maxwell equations similar in form to those for electromagnetic fields, yielding Electric and Magnetic components of gravity. This theory explains all gravitational effects as well as the instantaneous nearfield and speed of light farfield propagating fields.
So gravity is a propagating field that can finally be quantized enabling the unification of gravity and quantum mechanics. The current interpretation if quantum mechanics makes no sense, involving particles that are not real until measured, and in a fuzzy superposition of states. On the other hand, the Pilot Wave interpretation of Quantum Mechanics makes makes much more sense, which says particles are always real with real positions and velocities. The particles also interact with an energetic quantum field that permeates all of space, forming a pilot wave that guides the particle. This simpler explainatiin explains all known quantum phenomena. The only problem is that the Pilot Wave is known to interact instantaneously with the particle and all other particles, and this is completely incompatible with Relativity, but is compatible with Galilean Relativity. So due to the evidence presented here, this is no longer a problem, and elevates the Pilot Interpretation to our best explanation of Quantum Mechanics
TH-cam presentation of above argument:
th-cam.com/video/sePdJ7vSQvQ/w-d-xo.html
Paper it is based on: William D. Walker and Dag Stranneby, A New Interpretation of Relativity, 2023:
vixra.org/abs/2309.0145