Mark Nelson's Take on The Future of Nuclear

แชร์
ฝัง
  • เผยแพร่เมื่อ 19 ธ.ค. 2024

ความคิดเห็น •

  • @kaya051285
    @kaya051285 ปีที่แล้ว +2

    The biggest benefit of nuclear over Wind/Solar is that you don't need as much grid infrastructure extensions and upgrades (which are costly and people object to new power lines)
    You can do Wind/Solar upto maybe 50% but beyond that it rapidly needs significant costly grid upgrades
    The only exception to this is locations where Wind power has very high capacity factors eg for the UK where offshore wind farms are going to have 60% + capacity factor
    But most location don't have such good wind resources

  • @NomenNescio99
    @NomenNescio99 2 ปีที่แล้ว +11

    If Mark Nelson ever writes a book I would buy it, regardless of the topic.
    If he wrote the the book "How to mustache", I would buy two.

  • @ericdanielski4802
    @ericdanielski4802 2 ปีที่แล้ว +6

    Important interview.

  • @scottmedwid9346
    @scottmedwid9346 2 ปีที่แล้ว +2

    this information needs to be shared world wide!

  • @YourCapyFrenBigly_3DPipes1999
    @YourCapyFrenBigly_3DPipes1999 ปีที่แล้ว +2

    I was and am dismayed that they plowed right along with shutting down the San Onofre nuke plant near me.

  • @mdeucemeyer
    @mdeucemeyer 2 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Awesome discussion!

  • @chapter4travels
    @chapter4travels 2 ปีที่แล้ว +2

    Did I just hear Mark say something positive about an advanced nuclear reactor????
    I almost fell out of my chair.

  • @stanmitchell3375
    @stanmitchell3375 11 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Molten salt reactor needs no big power lines because it produces what is needed locally, can store excess or shut down, and needs small co2 turbines and can use heat for other things

  • @petefluffy7420
    @petefluffy7420 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Is Mr Nelson disguised as the 70s' king of porn, or is that his everyday appearance ?

  • @stephenbrickwood1602
    @stephenbrickwood1602 2 ปีที่แล้ว +3

    Naturally when 5 times more electricity is needed and no high energy density fossil fuels are used, then the national power grid capacity also can be increased.
    Grid overloads are dangerous.
    So if the grid cost 10 times more than power stations and an entire national power generation has to be expanded to 5 times more power then a national budget to subsidies the private construction of $trillions and $trillions and
    And USA military trained nuclear operators 3 shifts a day, 365.
    And also no CO2 in any other country, so every country has its own nuclear industries and USA military trained operators.
    9,000million people, all with nuclear industries and booming grid building economies