@@OutLanderUSNit's depressing. Like, trying to just have a standard conversation with these people, and it ends in trauma, or acronyms. Cuz that's all she talks about. Oh, or her radicalized views of what she thinks is good. (Shes lgbt, but supports Hamas, a group who would put a bag over her head, and kick her off the side of a building) Like fuck dude, you say you are smart, but that's not smart, thats straight up naive. Oh, and she comes from a middle upper class family. She grew up in a gated community ffs.
Hi kirsche, as a UK viewer i have to say how worrying i find the normalisation of not only BRIDGE initiatives, but also marxist ideologies and woke culture too. It genuinely is slowly shifting the boundaries and we barely notice it. My own city issues take down requests for English flags, while spending public money on pride and lgbt flags, just one example. My current commie government even considers enforcing blasphemy laws (making criticism of islam illegal). This stuff is handwaved by most people I know. victories over DEI feel so shallow to me when the rotting root of this stuff is tightening around us. Our PM promotes black rock publcially! I'm so happy Americans picked trump, but i worry most in my country don't care for freedom in the same way. I hope to legally move to the states one day. Keep holding the line, Americans!
i really worry about you english people, something really "fishy" is going on in your politics and on your island (no pun intended). The whole thing with the taxing of farmers seems utterly surreal, especially when you look upon the benefits your politician's pray to you. The unrest iam feeling is grounded in the way they are willing to take property and land away from families that actually lived there for hundreds of years, and mostly middle-class. (in my opinion; the "rich", your politics say they wanted to tax on, can easily pay out the State or just "transfer" land, property and money via. economically tricks and nothing is gained whatsoever) And then the Uk wants to give it to "new" farmers? I think, and bear with me, that could be very wrong what i am thinking, that from the start, many years ago, blackrock intended to buy everything that gets taken away from the english population and sell it back on high interest and/or to people they can manipulate into believing what they tell them. Which is exactly what happened in many other places on the world where BR invested into housing and land as property. Where i live, we have some politician's with BR background and they all seem to behave like there is always more the the whole story.
I don't know how that would be possible, when the original iteration was first given to Ronald Reagan in 1984. That said, read _1984,_ and understand: Orwell was right, when he described how anything of value was essentially taken over and controlled by Big Brother. Bridge seems to literally be acting via the Big Brother playbook.
While we continue to point out the cultural subversion, remember to also exude the good, the true, and the beautiful within our own lives, as such personal actions fractally spread across our culture. Keep rocking 💪
@LordNithilus Didn't work on me when they did it. Don't galvanize your enemies; also, you underestimate how obnoxious being a happy, unbothered person is to these miserable fucks 😂
Crazy Fox Lady, you may not be a journalist but you do far more actual journalism than than the so called journalists with all the degrees and training. We thank you for all the information you dig up.
2:24 Indeed being on here is especially egregious. A service where people find jobs should not be apart of any equality of outcome initiatives, because it incentivizes them to purposefully mishandle applications sent from people who aren't apart of a "protected class." I will be avoiding Indeed going forward.
Indeed should’ve been avoided for a while now. If you’ve paid attention to their advertising, they shifted from applicant-centric marketing to employer-centric marketing. They feel confident in having a captive pool of applicants so they don’t do anything to incentivize them anymore; now, they prioritize incentivizing employers with things like tools to more easily weed out applicants.
I tried Indeed for like two years, never got any response from nearly daily applications. Then I learned that all the online job boards are filled with what are called 'Ghost Jobs', which is basically some roundabout way for businesses to look good to the taxmen, by showing all the applications they're getting to prove that 'Yes we're not hoarding an absurd amount of money that you don't know about, look at all these salaries we're paying!', without having to actually hire anyone on. And I don't just mean like big corpo chains. This rot is at every rung of the ladder of capitalism.
I just had an interesting Thanksgiving. My entire family is right-winged. One of them works for the Heritage Foundation at the same pay scale of Project 2025 authors. So there's my father and brother who are pro-Trump. My sister who wants somebody more to the right of Trump because she knows he's not actually going to do Project 2025 and wishes he would. And then there's me the p***ed off Afghanistan war veteran who got shafted by Obama. I want whichever outcome gives me the "Tim Pool Special" because I am tired of communists breathing my air and really wish they'd just give us an excuse already! The argument sort of ended with me being quiet to avoid being pegged as the mentally unstable individual I probably am while my poor sister was getting double-teamed by the boomer and boomer fanboy. Good pie though.
wanna trade? my family is a bunch of unhinged liberals. thanksgiving amounted to me and my dad the only other conservative being shuffled off exiled to the foyer by ourselves while we cringed non-stop for 6 hours listening to all the insane shit they kept saying over in the dinning room.
Honestly, seeing that list of people reminded me of something I've heard, but I can't remember where from: the people making your life worse have names and addresses.
... not gonna lie, but each time I hear that plushie ad, I'm more inclined to send one to Sseth Tzeentach, to help him with ruling Africa, naturally! ... that or I send one to the guys that gave us 'Who Killed Captain Alex?', with hope it inspires them to create a new film after all these years...
Ah yes, Who Killed Captain Alex. A fine, yet underrated, underground classic. I wouldn't have known and seen it if it weren't for the VideoJoker commentaries a long time ago.
They're still fearmongering about the 2025 project because they don't have any real talking points. Well other than "the other side is mean and hurt my fee-fees 😢" I'll take a someone who a is a jerk but does good things over being buried in toxic positivity.
Some of the things in Project 2025 are wretched. If you don't know by now that they want to elevate the president to power over almost everything, you haven't been paying attention. Unitary executive theory. Look it up.
On one hand, this is entertaining to watch. On the other hand, though, I'm starting to have a feeling that the DEI faction isn't the only one vying for power. I think there might actually be at least two if not three different international factions, and I also think the three factions are connected to the major players on the Asian continent. If my hunch is correct, that brings up a question: how much of the information we receive is actually true?
...Does everyone just forget that Project 2025 was hacked by a bunch of furries several months ago and found to have connections to the CCP? Talk about important info getting memory holed.
Hate to break it to you, but "Press X To Doubt." I say this as someone who has actually read Project 2025, and those involved with it had nothing at all to do with China. Unless conservative organizations like Heritage Foundation have CCP connections, which again, I doubt.
Ever since watching Kirsche's virtuoso off-the-cuff read of candle descriptions, I've been wondering whether she auditions for voice acting roles. And if not, why not?
@@r.connor9280I don't know about that, I'm sure the pioneers of VTubing weren't trained in it. It's probably more common now with VTubing being the new Idol industry and the strong competition you'd encounter solo.
Maybe she in fact uses a voice-changer , maybe she's too afraid of her personal information getting out , who knows ? The fact that I (and others) heard similarities in her voice to that of Geeky Sparkles (nowadays not at all) might point to Kneon having adjusted the audio output a bit.
@@HenshinFanatic his board couped him after he bagged a big juicy story involving big money in a particular field (hint:This new segment sponsored by p__zer). OMG is 100% his but he keeps it open for more citizens journalists.
@@JuanGil-c6n I used to be the same way but I got tired of the principled loser ethos. Losing isn't ethical if you could win and prevent harm to the nation.
@@EidolonKaos "principled loser ethos" if you have victories based on lies and deceit, you end up like the left, defeated. being principled ensures that the foundation is sound, and difficult to overthrow the reason why americans are able to fight back is because the foundation for the culture was based on (christian) principles, which is why the opposition had to work for decades to undermine the population. the foundation was too strong. being a principled loser has a greater victory in the long run, while an unprincipled winner runs out of victories the closer they get to the end of the race.
this is a BRIDGE too far, and this entire thing has cult vibes with the cult infiltrating the fabric of society. then I suddenly and inexplicably get internet issue every time I watch these types of this videos, almost as if my internet provider is throttling my connection and slowing my browser down. weird.
It's basically every government and private org to some extent, including nonprofits. Crybullies can be removed from power though. That's the task for the next decade or two at least
It's funny to see all of those brands together like that because the place I worked was like plastered all over every single fucking place and they were for sure using DEI as a brand for companies to contract them so they both can abuse the DEI metrics
@@AOT_HxH95 nikkie was backed by Raytheon and plenty of Dems openly admitted to registering Republican just to try to primary her, they tried to stump trump with desantis as well but both Ron and Halle withdrew and neither gave their endorsements to my recollection BUT vivick and RFK jr. Did. So sure the establishment will claim WHATEVER they want to say they've gotten the upper hand but in the end it was a massive cope, we got the more truthful numbers this round about.
@@AOT_HxH95the democrats are known for being inconsistent on issues. Like how lots of democrats didn’t want to get the vaccine when trump was in office, but then as soon as he left, the democrats suddenly loved the vaccine
Bridge and project 2025 are 2 sides of the same coin. I disagree with both. Project 2025 has some more based ideas on paper but it leans too far to the right and may have unforseen consequences (like many of the far left policies are now experiencing) for me to stand behind it. We need to return to the center, not swing the pendulum 180 degrees in the other direction.
Project 2025 is based in a lot of far right ideas, BRIDGE is the exact opposite, you are right. Both export authoritarianism though, neither are libertarian in their ideals.
its already happened in large part. modern democrats sprinted left as fast as possible, their core are now extremists. modern republicans were dragged by trump kicking and screaming to the center. the policies of trumps republicans are the same as centrists from 2008. the difference lies in the fact that the current mainstream liberals are extreme left, there are no moderate leftists now. i myself was a centrist during the Obama years, and once trump dragged the republicans to the center, i ended up right wing. but my views and beliefs on each policy have been completely unchanged in all that time. i still believe and support the exact same things i did in 2008 as i do now, but now modern republicans actually line up with me on nearly every issue. i went from politically homeless to center right thanks to trump dragging them to the center.
OmG is the New Prject Veritas O'Keefe Media Group. Oh lol chat brought it up. O'Keefe literally teaches anyone how to do it 90% of his content is Anons
I remember someone making a post about project 2025 on Reddit when it was new and still unknown. I didn’t know anything about it so I asked what is said about abortion, since that’s what the poster was so hysterical about. That’s it, I didn’t offer an opinion, I merely asked what it was. No big deal right? Not offensive. Well, wouldn’t you know from just that, multiple people went on a days long campaign against me. Slandering me in ridiculously exaggerated ways, wishing some pretty horrific violence on me, digging through my post history, partially quoting me or quoting out of context, following me all over the website. Just from asking a question. Just because I didn’t immediately go all in on hysteria with them. That’s how cultishly devoted they are.
OT: I have problems to write comments. The whole Commentary part is missing for me, i cant click anywhere to open the writing box or write any letters. This Problem only appears on specific channels like this one here(kirsche), garrys channel, shad, swtheory etc. Does anyone have the same Problem?
Swear I had that happen. Not sure if it's a wide creator net or just on specific videos, but its been on a couple videos of that type that I've watched recently.
I never had a single argument before the election with a lib, where they didn't tried to force me to defend project 2025, when neither I nor Trump subscribes to it.
@Bsweds32 From what I heard, Project 2025 basically will turn the US into a Christian Theocracy, nix the Department of Education, the EPA, and curtail the rights of those who disagree with the architects of the entire apparatus. BRIDGE, on the hand, from what I know so far, it's basically Dee Eee Eye 2.0. Either way, corpos win. Anyone simping for either is either disingenuous, ignorant, or simply doing so out of spite.
Honestly it makes me sad that people like Azmon refuse to even react to kirsches stuff. I’m sure there are people on his subreddit that promote kirsche’s content.
What's the reason to be against this? I don't know enough about this to form a proper opinion, but can someone let me know, with more than just "it's evil", what is bad about it? I recently had to attend a DEI meeting and it seems fine enough to want everyone to feel included, what do you guys know that I don't about this?
DEI is just racism Systematically giving preferential treatment to a group of humans based on race / gender always means you are also systematically discriminating against the groups not included. People against DEI are generally just against racism. We want equality of opportunity, not equality of outcome.
DEI is the reason for stuff like race swaps, white men being kept out of managerial positions, Boeing planes falling out of the sky, and Kamala Harris being vice president.
DEI used to be equality of opportunity but has devolved into equality of outcome. We need equity measures to some extent to ensure equality of opportunities but turning the dial up to 11 is not the answer. At the same time turning the dial to -1 is also not the answer. I will be blunt here: a minor degree of DEI is A VERY GOOD THING. For example, a small degree of DEI helps a company providing outreach to disadvantaged groups who otherwise would not have a chance to apply to a company, and we just need to get more disadvantaged groups to apply, we don’t need to change standards for hiring in favor of disadvantaged groups. A high degree of DEI becomes minority supremacy though.
@@occultnightingale1106 I can point to a few: - "Eliminate terms..." from promise 1 is authoritarian and too broad. - "Federal policy to get tech out of the hands of children" from promise 1 is also too broad and subject to interpretation. Would this prevent a 10 year old from learning how to program on a laptop? - "Muzzle woke propaganda" from promise 2 defines neither 'woke' nor 'propaganda'. It's easy to assume what's understood by those words but such unclear understanding becomes dangerous when interpreted from the POV of law. - "Increase national defense" from promise 2 states neither the purpose nor size. Such an increase will come from tax. How much tax?
@@gnerkus *1: "Eliminate Terms..."* Removing gendered language from federal legislation is...authoritarian? By removing these specific terms, it means no law could or would be able to discriminate based on such categories, or enshrine such categories as protected characteristics. I agree that it's too vague for implementation, but how exactly is it either authoritarian or evil to prevent governments from discriminating against its own citizens based on their immutable characteristics? *2: "Federal policy to get tech out of the hands of children"* I agree that this is too broad and subject to interpretation, but being vague is not necessarily evil. *3: "Muzzle woke propaganda"* I agree that both terms would need to be defined properly before any actual legislation could be written, but failing to define one's terms is not evil. *4: "Increase National Defense"* I agree that there needs to be a lot more specificity when it comes to this statement, but that's not necessarily evil. Keep in mind that Project 2025 is designed as a proposed guideline for future legislation, not the legislation itself. Obviously it's going to be vague, because the people whose job it is to determine the finer details of legislation is Congress, not the Heritage Foundation. The original question wasn't "what part of Project 2025 is poorly written/defined/explained," the question was "how is Project 2025 evil?" And the next question after that is "how is Project 2025 in any way as evil as the BRIDGE initiative to which it was directly compared?"
And the potential banning of anything NSFW is also authoritarian. I do agree with removing it from schools, because kids should NOT be exposed to it. However wanting to shutter telecommunications firms? That sounds like Internet censorship.
It may not be necessarily evil but this vagueness can be a breeding ground for corruption and makes it hard to us to trust P2025. We have very good reasons to have major distrust in P2025 and it working. As good as the intentions might be it can also be interpreted by congress for objectively unconstitutional and evil reasons. I would highly suggest you become more skeptical of sources with vague definitions and favor more precise and trustworthy sources. Some people are racists who interpret anti-wokeness as anything that helps racial minorities and therefore will use antiwokeness as a vehicle for racism and hate while others are in good faith and use anti-wokeness to fight against excessive counterproductive progressivism. Because of this, antiwokeness has devolved into a meaningless buzzword with unreliable and possibly dangerous connotations especially when used with an audience who don’t interpret it in a positive manner. Precise definitions of terms should be put in an official document like P2025.
@@laffing_hwhitee The defense of the authoritarian goals expressed in Project 2025. For example, in 24:16, Kirsche agrees that "tech that faciliate the spread of pr0n be shuttered".
Take me home today! youtooz.com/products/kirsche-plush-9-inch
Hey, I think Elon could be interested in this video if he doesn't already know about Bridge...
woah. we skipping the song and dance?
youre shadow banned on YT
I did my part lol, she will be joining my pippa vinyl figurine :^ If both of those arrive safely x'D
@@thekingofseals6832 based
The amount of acronyms and code words is getting near schizophrenic
What better way to obfuscate and confuse us?
@@OutLanderUSNit's depressing.
Like, trying to just have a standard conversation with these people, and it ends in trauma, or acronyms. Cuz that's all she talks about. Oh, or her radicalized views of what she thinks is good. (Shes lgbt, but supports Hamas, a group who would put a bag over her head, and kick her off the side of a building)
Like fuck dude, you say you are smart, but that's not smart, thats straight up naive. Oh, and she comes from a middle upper class family. She grew up in a gated community ffs.
Kirsche already is more of a journalist than most "journalist"
Please don’t call Kirsche slurs
Hi kirsche, as a UK viewer i have to say how worrying i find the normalisation of not only BRIDGE initiatives, but also marxist ideologies and woke culture too. It genuinely is slowly shifting the boundaries and we barely notice it. My own city issues take down requests for English flags, while spending public money on pride and lgbt flags, just one example. My current commie government even considers enforcing blasphemy laws (making criticism of islam illegal). This stuff is handwaved by most people I know. victories over DEI feel so shallow to me when the rotting root of this stuff is tightening around us. Our PM promotes black rock publcially! I'm so happy Americans picked trump, but i worry most in my country don't care for freedom in the same way. I hope to legally move to the states one day. Keep holding the line, Americans!
Don't worry, Trump's administration will pressure Human Rights organisations to actually do their work. Just survive those couple of months.
Suffice to say, that blasphemy law is proof that the UK is NOT a free speech country.
i really worry about you english people, something really "fishy" is going on in your politics and on your island (no pun intended). The whole thing with the taxing of farmers seems utterly surreal, especially when you look upon the benefits your politician's pray to you. The unrest iam feeling is grounded in the way they are willing to take property and land away from families that actually lived there for hundreds of years, and mostly middle-class. (in my opinion; the "rich", your politics say they wanted to tax on, can easily pay out the State or just "transfer" land, property and money via. economically tricks and nothing is gained whatsoever)
And then the Uk wants to give it to "new" farmers?
I think, and bear with me, that could be very wrong what i am thinking, that from the start, many years ago, blackrock intended to buy everything that gets taken away from the english population and sell it back on high interest and/or to people they can manipulate into believing what they tell them. Which is exactly what happened in many other places on the world where BR invested into housing and land as property.
Where i live, we have some politician's with BR background and they all seem to behave like there is always more the the whole story.
You don’t need to differentiate between BRIDGE initiatives, Marxist ideologies, and woke culture. These things are all one and the same.
@@AceGold-hp8jv and equally deserving of being on the receiving end of the Geneva checklist.
I wish Trump was even half as cool as the left paints him out to be tbh
Trump is 100% for abortion. Even campaigned for late-term. It won't be a state's rights thing.
Or half as much a right-wing dictator. But he's actually just a 90's moderate progressive liberal.
@@axelhopfinger533He is a sane person whith sound ideas, And aparently that is extremelly rare in politics.
@@adrianocs4imagine believing trump is in charge……..
@@articlered2334 believing you won the elections....
So many fictional jobs...The worst is that these people truly think that they are active members of the society.
What a joke.
Inb4 bridge "enjoyers" actually say that project 2025 was theirs all along
Obviously. Communism isn't about winning the fight, it's about controlling what's fought over.
I don't know how that would be possible, when the original iteration was first given to Ronald Reagan in 1984.
That said, read _1984,_ and understand: Orwell was right, when he described how anything of value was essentially taken over and controlled by Big Brother. Bridge seems to literally be acting via the Big Brother playbook.
I miss when bridge was just a card game
Make Bridges Architecture Again
I miss when bridge was just a place mythical trolls live under
While we continue to point out the cultural subversion, remember to also exude the good, the true, and the beautiful within our own lives, as such personal actions fractally spread across our culture. Keep rocking 💪
Win with grace.
@@leebard9335 just remember winning means _winning._ even Jesus used a whip when necessary.
@EidolonKaos But winning without grace sets you up for a fall later. If you're not better than your opponents, you'll lose when it counts.
@@leebard9335 nah be as obnoxious to your foes and demoralize them with your energy.
@LordNithilus Didn't work on me when they did it. Don't galvanize your enemies; also, you underestimate how obnoxious being a happy, unbothered person is to these miserable fucks 😂
Crazy Fox Lady, you may not be a journalist but you do far more actual journalism than than the so called journalists with all the degrees and training. We thank you for all the information you dig up.
Beauty will save the world.
2:24 Indeed being on here is especially egregious. A service where people find jobs should not be apart of any equality of outcome initiatives, because it incentivizes them to purposefully mishandle applications sent from people who aren't apart of a "protected class." I will be avoiding Indeed going forward.
From the moment Indeed came out it was aggressively fellating preferential treatment for blacks and women.
X has a job search function now, incidentally.
Indeed should’ve been avoided for a while now. If you’ve paid attention to their advertising, they shifted from applicant-centric marketing to employer-centric marketing. They feel confident in having a captive pool of applicants so they don’t do anything to incentivize them anymore; now, they prioritize incentivizing employers with things like tools to more easily weed out applicants.
I tried Indeed for like two years, never got any response from nearly daily applications.
Then I learned that all the online job boards are filled with what are called 'Ghost Jobs', which is basically some roundabout way for businesses to look good to the taxmen, by showing all the applications they're getting to prove that 'Yes we're not hoarding an absurd amount of money that you don't know about, look at all these salaries we're paying!', without having to actually hire anyone on.
And I don't just mean like big corpo chains. This rot is at every rung of the ladder of capitalism.
@@minigunner1218 i knew i wasn't crazy, they switched up so fast after enough people signed up
I just had an interesting Thanksgiving. My entire family is right-winged. One of them works for the Heritage Foundation at the same pay scale of Project 2025 authors. So there's my father and brother who are pro-Trump. My sister who wants somebody more to the right of Trump because she knows he's not actually going to do Project 2025 and wishes he would. And then there's me the p***ed off Afghanistan war veteran who got shafted by Obama. I want whichever outcome gives me the "Tim Pool Special" because I am tired of communists breathing my air and really wish they'd just give us an excuse already!
The argument sort of ended with me being quiet to avoid being pegged as the mentally unstable individual I probably am while my poor sister was getting double-teamed by the boomer and boomer fanboy.
Good pie though.
wanna trade? my family is a bunch of unhinged liberals. thanksgiving amounted to me and my dad the only other conservative being shuffled off exiled to the foyer by ourselves while we cringed non-stop for 6 hours listening to all the insane shit they kept saying over in the dinning room.
@@e.corellius4495 Hell no!
Honestly, seeing that list of people reminded me of something I've heard, but I can't remember where from:
the people making your life worse have names and addresses.
- W I S D O M -
He can’t keep getting away with it
DEI is just discrimination with extra steps
im not sure there actually are extra steps lol. its just plain ol' discrimination.
I like that these "people" put there name's and faces out there, it'll make future proceedings much easier.
... not gonna lie, but each time I hear that plushie ad, I'm more inclined to send one to Sseth Tzeentach, to help him with ruling Africa, naturally!
... that or I send one to the guys that gave us 'Who Killed Captain Alex?', with hope it inspires them to create a new film after all these years...
Ah yes, Who Killed Captain Alex. A fine, yet underrated, underground classic.
I wouldn't have known and seen it if it weren't for the VideoJoker commentaries a long time ago.
"Project 2025 isn't real, it can't hurt you"
Project 2025: "Hello there"
They're still fearmongering about the 2025 project because they don't have any real talking points. Well other than "the other side is mean and hurt my fee-fees 😢"
I'll take a someone who a is a jerk but does good things over being buried in toxic positivity.
Some of the things in Project 2025 are wretched. If you don't know by now that they want to elevate the president to power over almost everything, you haven't been paying attention. Unitary executive theory. Look it up.
On one hand, this is entertaining to watch. On the other hand, though, I'm starting to have a feeling that the DEI faction isn't the only one vying for power. I think there might actually be at least two if not three different international factions, and I also think the three factions are connected to the major players on the Asian continent.
If my hunch is correct, that brings up a question: how much of the information we receive is actually true?
maybe they'll sponsor your BRIDGE ticket if you tell them that you're a non-buynary foxu-kin content creator seeking to report on their event?
It's nice that they put it all out there so you know what to avoid like plague
This is insane, gods above i hope this can be stopped.
no gods, only torment.
Rack'em and stack'em.
"No Jesus here. Only accurate shocks."
~Evil Neuro
Even if it cannot be stopped soon, all those behind it will kneel before Jesus
@@leargamma4912 since they've rejected the truth they deserve its best to not spoil the terrifying surprise.🤫
...Does everyone just forget that Project 2025 was hacked by a bunch of furries several months ago and found to have connections to the CCP? Talk about important info getting memory holed.
Hate to break it to you, but "Press X To Doubt."
I say this as someone who has actually read Project 2025, and those involved with it had nothing at all to do with China.
Unless conservative organizations like Heritage Foundation have CCP connections, which again, I doubt.
"Indeed" it makes so much sense now
Ever since watching Kirsche's virtuoso off-the-cuff read of candle descriptions, I've been wondering whether she auditions for voice acting roles. And if not, why not?
I'm fairly sure voice training is needed to make the VTuber job work, so it shouldn't surprise us that much
@@r.connor9280I don't know about that, I'm sure the pioneers of VTubing weren't trained in it. It's probably more common now with VTubing being the new Idol industry and the strong competition you'd encounter solo.
@@r.connor9280It helps for sure. I don’t think it necessarily is a requirement though.
Maybe she in fact uses a voice-changer , maybe she's too afraid of her personal information getting out , who knows ?
The fact that I (and others) heard similarities in her voice to that of Geeky Sparkles (nowadays not at all) might point to Kneon having adjusted the audio output a bit.
Smash JT wants you on his channel, I know he's not super big yet but a lot of people are watching him!
All these "diversity officers" need to get the sit down and "what, would you say, you do here?" speech like in The Office.
When she was reading the BRIDGE web site at the beggining, I puked a little bit in my mouth.
I knew Colgate was too large not to be shady, but I never had a reason to boycott until now. Damn.
Thanks for the heads up. Waze uninstalled.
Bring on the broligarchy
Kakarooooooottttttttttt!!!
A liftocracy
I will bring the melters for the Emporer's ultimate inevitable vixctory!!!😂😂😂😂😂😂😂
All this sounds all good and dandy, but in practice, it brings extreme chaos, leaving only destruction in its wake.
They should do this in Saudi Arabia and in Africa.
@@allenkrust4410 oh, and North Korea.
I love the plushie intro :D
God the list at the end really sums up how delusional they are. It hurts my brain hurts.
anyone made the connection of Bridge and that bridge in that one Pewdiepie gamer moment yet? lol
It would be absolutely hilarious if you managed to get o'keife attention.
OMG is Okeef Media Group.
So he's a grifter.
@@HenshinFanatic he got fired a year or two ago.
From his newest venture after Veritas? Guess he doesn't know how to vet his employees then.
@@HenshinFanatic his board couped him after he bagged a big juicy story involving big money in a particular field (hint:This new segment sponsored by p__zer). OMG is 100% his but he keeps it open for more citizens journalists.
I'm not a conservative or right leaning, but Project 2025 doesn't sound all that bad.
i personally dont trust anything that can be turned into law.
remember, unforseen consequences come about from good intentions.
Last time I looked, there were a few unconstitutional things in there, but it's not actually bad.
@@JuanGil-c6n I used to be the same way but I got tired of the principled loser ethos. Losing isn't ethical if you could win and prevent harm to the nation.
@@EidolonKaos "principled loser ethos"
if you have victories based on lies and deceit, you end up like the left, defeated.
being principled ensures that the foundation is sound, and difficult to overthrow
the reason why americans are able to fight back is because the foundation for the culture was based on (christian) principles, which is why the opposition had to work for decades to undermine the population. the foundation was too strong.
being a principled loser has a greater victory in the long run, while an unprincipled winner runs out of victories the closer they get to the end of the race.
@Eidelon People always forget the age old adage "who cares I won" lol you violated these principles "who cares I won" now I get to set the narrative.
You need to pair with Savvy for a supreme autistic girl destruction of bridge
this is a BRIDGE too far, and this entire thing has cult vibes with the cult infiltrating the fabric of society. then I suddenly and inexplicably get internet issue every time I watch these types of this videos, almost as if my internet provider is throttling my connection and slowing my browser down. weird.
If Asmon ignores it, KitsuneMizuki will cover it, she is a based fox girl named Mizuki here on YT ^^
Seeing indeed up there kinda explains a lot about my job hunting.
11:54 the meme becomes reality. Fox News is real and she has Parkinson's
I've already said: "When 'Fox News' means 'Anime Fox Woman Reporting The Truth' and not 'Legacy Media Company Colluding in the 2020 Election Fraud.'"
Ah come on man! Not Wayze too 🤦🏼♂️🤦🏼♂️🤦🏼♂️
It's basically every government and private org to some extent, including nonprofits. Crybullies can be removed from power though. That's the task for the next decade or two at least
What is Wayze?
WAIT! Is this Death Battle Episode?!
Blade Devil represent.
@@Marcara081 😎👍
Anyone have the name for Fox lady’s pre stream music? It actually fucks
It's funny to see all of those brands together like that because the place I worked was like plastered all over every single fucking place and they were for sure using DEI as a brand for companies to contract them so they both can abuse the DEI metrics
Talk to James O'Keefe about doing some undercover journalism?
A V Tuber doing more relevant news then the actual news. What a time-line
Popping in to remind people Niki Hallie's team put together Project 2025 it says it very early into the document
@@AOT_HxH95 nikkie was backed by Raytheon and plenty of Dems openly admitted to registering Republican just to try to primary her, they tried to stump trump with desantis as well but both Ron and Halle withdrew and neither gave their endorsements to my recollection BUT vivick and RFK jr. Did. So sure the establishment will claim WHATEVER they want to say they've gotten the upper hand but in the end it was a massive cope, we got the more truthful numbers this round about.
@@AOT_HxH95 TLDR: they like to make up stuff
@@AOT_HxH95the democrats are known for being inconsistent on issues. Like how lots of democrats didn’t want to get the vaccine when trump was in office, but then as soon as he left, the democrats suddenly loved the vaccine
they didn’t.
Here's my daily foxu viewer tax.
Bridge and project 2025 are 2 sides of the same coin. I disagree with both. Project 2025 has some more based ideas on paper but it leans too far to the right and may have unforseen consequences (like many of the far left policies are now experiencing) for me to stand behind it. We need to return to the center, not swing the pendulum 180 degrees in the other direction.
Project 2025 is based in a lot of far right ideas, BRIDGE is the exact opposite, you are right. Both export authoritarianism though, neither are libertarian in their ideals.
Today's center is yesterday's left.
Its Jewish, Left or Right. That's the problem.
its already happened in large part. modern democrats sprinted left as fast as possible, their core are now extremists. modern republicans were dragged by trump kicking and screaming to the center. the policies of trumps republicans are the same as centrists from 2008. the difference lies in the fact that the current mainstream liberals are extreme left, there are no moderate leftists now. i myself was a centrist during the Obama years, and once trump dragged the republicans to the center, i ended up right wing. but my views and beliefs on each policy have been completely unchanged in all that time. i still believe and support the exact same things i did in 2008 as i do now, but now modern republicans actually line up with me on nearly every issue. i went from politically homeless to center right thanks to trump dragging them to the center.
Project 2025 didn’t go far enough like repealing the civil right act.
Conspiracy theory we haven't found the conservative alternative to Bridge
Bridge? As in the initiative formed by China?
I think that's BRICS (Brazil, Russia, India, China, South Africa).
Are you thinking of the belt and road initiative?
I think national defense being greater than the next couple countries combined is large enough.
wait until you find out how much of it is because government contract negotiators suck and overpay for everything.
America is keeping NATO afloat after all
OmG is the New Prject Veritas O'Keefe Media Group. Oh lol chat brought it up. O'Keefe literally teaches anyone how to do it 90% of his content is Anons
I remember someone making a post about project 2025 on Reddit when it was new and still unknown. I didn’t know anything about it so I asked what is said about abortion, since that’s what the poster was so hysterical about. That’s it, I didn’t offer an opinion, I merely asked what it was. No big deal right? Not offensive.
Well, wouldn’t you know from just that, multiple people went on a days long campaign against me. Slandering me in ridiculously exaggerated ways, wishing some pretty horrific violence on me, digging through my post history, partially quoting me or quoting out of context, following me all over the website. Just from asking a question. Just because I didn’t immediately go all in on hysteria with them. That’s how cultishly devoted they are.
Screw Project 2025! It is no better than DEI and BRIDGE!
I no bs just got an ad on here for some dei webinar thing I had to report it for racism and sexism
Treat yourself to 9 inches of Kirsche
I don't agree with project 2025, but if I had to choose that or Bridges plans... Well sign me up for 2025.
You and Savvy should go undercover
Darn, I missed the kirsche plush. orz
Inclusivity and Diversity should not be forced.
👾
7:20 Team Rocket. Nooooo not giovanni too.
9:55 Maybe float this to James at OMG
OMG OKEEFE MEDIA GROUP
13:33 through 18:20 reads like the parts of the bible that just lists names and how they're related ad nauseum
Ye
We need to bring back McCarthyism...
OT: I have problems to write comments. The whole Commentary part is missing for me, i cant click anywhere to open the writing box or write any letters. This Problem only appears on specific channels like this one here(kirsche), garrys channel, shad, swtheory etc. Does anyone have the same Problem?
Swear I had that happen. Not sure if it's a wide creator net or just on specific videos, but its been on a couple videos of that type that I've watched recently.
They need Sam Porter Bridges
I never had a single argument before the election with a lib, where they didn't tried to force me to defend project 2025, when neither I nor Trump subscribes to it.
Lets goooo!
Hi pretty amenal lady. How are you today. Is your character on screen a foxy.
holy i thought at first kirsche was reading project 2025 then i notice its BRIDGES INTERPRETATION of project 2025, no wonder parts seems disjointed
The Lerner's??? It's all Cohencidence . . .
Not much room for Libertarianism in either , so sad
While there are head scratchers in 2025, mostly buried underneath philosophy & constitutional arguments, there's a lot of good things in it.
Patriot fox.
I'm confused, why is Project 2025 bad again?
bridge wasn't complaining, its promoting it😌
@Bsweds32 From what I heard, Project 2025 basically will turn the US into a Christian Theocracy, nix the Department of Education, the EPA, and curtail the rights of those who disagree with the architects of the entire apparatus.
BRIDGE, on the hand, from what I know so far, it's basically Dee Eee Eye 2.0.
Either way, corpos win. Anyone simping for either is either disingenuous, ignorant, or simply doing so out of spite.
Because it's connected to China? I am the only one who remembers this??
@@Blu3-Fir3 a bridge connecting to china?
how terrifying😐
I wish Trump was- Ah damn someone already posted it.
Honestly it makes me sad that people like Azmon refuse to even react to kirsches stuff. I’m sure there are people on his subreddit that promote kirsche’s content.
why is your model jittering so much? I'm sorry but I've never seen vtuber models jitter this much 😅
What's the reason to be against this? I don't know enough about this to form a proper opinion, but can someone let me know, with more than just "it's evil", what is bad about it? I recently had to attend a DEI meeting and it seems fine enough to want everyone to feel included, what do you guys know that I don't about this?
DEI is just racism
Systematically giving preferential treatment to a group of humans based on race / gender always means you are also systematically discriminating against the groups not included.
People against DEI are generally just against racism. We want equality of opportunity, not equality of outcome.
@LostOter thank you for this response. I hadn't thought of it in that way.
DEI is the reason for stuff like race swaps, white men being kept out of managerial positions, Boeing planes falling out of the sky, and Kamala Harris being vice president.
DEI used to be equality of opportunity but has devolved into equality of outcome. We need equity measures to some extent to ensure equality of opportunities but turning the dial up to 11 is not the answer. At the same time turning the dial to -1 is also not the answer. I will be blunt here: a minor degree of DEI is A VERY GOOD THING. For example, a small degree of DEI helps a company providing outreach to disadvantaged groups who otherwise would not have a chance to apply to a company, and we just need to get more disadvantaged groups to apply, we don’t need to change standards for hiring in favor of disadvantaged groups. A high degree of DEI becomes minority supremacy though.
Hey Kirsche are you lookin for a husband, asking for a friend
thanks friend, i didn't think to ask directly🥲
Get in line buddy!
What even is Bridge?
Kirsche has multiple videos going over what Bridge is, but put it simply. They are an org that sell other companies on how to implement DEI practices.
@@StevetheLynx Basically Sweet Baby Inc but spread wider?
Eeyup. And more totalitarian as well.
@@marcusblackwell2372 Much, much worse.
Juice NWO
.
The problem with Project 2025 is that it didn’t go far enough.
I honestly don’t like either
Project 2025 is some NGO's fan-fic. BRIDGE is trying to fundamentally change the world for the worse without our consent and against our will.
project 2025 = Make America Great Again
Both are just displays of evil from polar opposite sides.
What's evil about Project 2025?
@@occultnightingale1106 I can point to a few:
- "Eliminate terms..." from promise 1 is authoritarian and too broad.
- "Federal policy to get tech out of the hands of children" from promise 1 is also too broad and subject to interpretation. Would this prevent a 10 year old from learning how to program on a laptop?
- "Muzzle woke propaganda" from promise 2 defines neither 'woke' nor 'propaganda'. It's easy to assume what's understood by those words but such unclear understanding becomes dangerous when interpreted from the POV of law.
- "Increase national defense" from promise 2 states neither the purpose nor size. Such an increase will come from tax. How much tax?
@@gnerkus *1: "Eliminate Terms..."*
Removing gendered language from federal legislation is...authoritarian? By removing these specific terms, it means no law could or would be able to discriminate based on such categories, or enshrine such categories as protected characteristics. I agree that it's too vague for implementation, but how exactly is it either authoritarian or evil to prevent governments from discriminating against its own citizens based on their immutable characteristics?
*2: "Federal policy to get tech out of the hands of children"*
I agree that this is too broad and subject to interpretation, but being vague is not necessarily evil.
*3: "Muzzle woke propaganda"*
I agree that both terms would need to be defined properly before any actual legislation could be written, but failing to define one's terms is not evil.
*4: "Increase National Defense"*
I agree that there needs to be a lot more specificity when it comes to this statement, but that's not necessarily evil.
Keep in mind that Project 2025 is designed as a proposed guideline for future legislation, not the legislation itself. Obviously it's going to be vague, because the people whose job it is to determine the finer details of legislation is Congress, not the Heritage Foundation. The original question wasn't "what part of Project 2025 is poorly written/defined/explained," the question was "how is Project 2025 evil?" And the next question after that is "how is Project 2025 in any way as evil as the BRIDGE initiative to which it was directly compared?"
And the potential banning of anything NSFW is also authoritarian. I do agree with removing it from schools, because kids should NOT be exposed to it. However wanting to shutter telecommunications firms? That sounds like Internet censorship.
It may not be necessarily evil but this vagueness can be a breeding ground for corruption and makes it hard to us to trust P2025. We have very good reasons to have major distrust in P2025 and it working. As good as the intentions might be it can also be interpreted by congress for objectively unconstitutional and evil reasons. I would highly suggest you become more skeptical of sources with vague definitions and favor more precise and trustworthy sources. Some people are racists who interpret anti-wokeness as anything that helps racial minorities and therefore will use antiwokeness as a vehicle for racism and hate while others are in good faith and use anti-wokeness to fight against excessive counterproductive progressivism. Because of this, antiwokeness has devolved into a meaningless buzzword with unreliable and possibly dangerous connotations especially when used with an audience who don’t interpret it in a positive manner. Precise definitions of terms should be put in an official document like P2025.
Mask off Kirsche.
How so???🤔🤔🤔
@@laffing_hwhitee The defense of the authoritarian goals expressed in Project 2025.
For example, in 24:16, Kirsche agrees that "tech that faciliate the spread of pr0n be shuttered".
@@gnerkus p0rn is bad and destructive Industry
She wore a mask?
message Arch to get in contact with others
Ya but why the 1980s porno music?