I think the spire on OWTC is an advanced technology with a power and not just something to boost the height. Both OWTC and 270 Park are gorgeous and fascinating architectural designs.
I'm not impartial about this; from my point of view, everything was done in the worst possible way in this building, from the awarding process to the design. And regarding what you mentioned, I think everything on the antenna could have been placed inside a parapet or integrated into the building without being exposed on a simple mast. In any case, I think the CTBUH was very 'lenient' in admitting that the antenna was a spire, and therefore, I believe it should never have counted as the official architectural height. But again, it might be my own issue, and I may no longer be objective when evaluating this building.
@@Magnitudx Maybe it wasn't a perfect process but America was at war after 9/11. The OWTC is an architectural achievement because it was erected during war and built from ashes. The building of OWTC and WTC after 9/11 is meaningful and left an unforgettable mark on history hence 1,776 ft tall with the spire. I think the spire is an advanced technology for nuclear power and it needs to be outside. Maybe it shoots laser beams into the sky to create clouds/rain/lightening/electricity. Maybe it's a device with electromagnetic powers or a weapon like a death ray. The way antennas need to be on a roof or telescopes on top of mountains or in the atmosphere, the spire needs to be on top of a building at a high altitude so it can work. I do not believe at all the spire was placed there to boost the height. If you stack all the WTC buildings how high would that be? Do you really think that height could not be accomplished without the spire?
Yes, that's how it's planned for now, but we'll see how it turns out in the end. a4.pbase.com/o12/06/102706/1/174804985.J5hXUkqU.FosterandPartners3.png
It's mind boggling to me that they're willing to build such beautiful skyscrapers yet are held back by symbolism because of not wanting to go higher than the one World Trade Centre if I was building a high rise I wouldn't give a shit how fuking tall I had to go I wouldn't allow a certain height to stop me
Only one city on earth has at least eight skyscrapers that are at least 1200 feet / 364 m tall: New York City! I was there 2 weeks ago, and the skyscrapers, along with the retail, energy, bridges, rivers and restaurants, were wonderful. In my opinion, Central Park Tower is the tallest building in NYC. It has a roof that is over 100 feet / 30 m taller than 1 WTC. 1 WTC has a huge spire, that, technically, makes it taller. Central Park Tower was in the video, and is the tallest residential building on earth, and the tallest, by roof height, outside of Asia.
@@scottwood928 My apologies. You're absolutely right, I was wrong. And not just about that, Shenzhen won’t meet the criteria until next year either. So your statement is absolutely correct: The Big Apple still holds that title. And with what’s coming in the next few years, it’s only going to get better.
Nyc's skyline is getting crazier everyday yearbut i think it's losing its skyline quality due to having to find whatever spots are available for the next tallest buildings. When you're on Manhattan however, it will only look better.
The rendering you did of the building was fantastic, but that font coloration and the confusing reflections of it is weird and ugly. I’d suggest a solid white, keeping the same font. Also the flare flourishes and the font taking up half the screen when looking up at the building was very distracting
why do they have to put the commrae tower near the crysler building like that though and now it going to look like an L where the super tall skyscrapers are going to be at due to the street that lead to grand central and billionaire row
With the help of Blender and Resolve, mainly, and some work, of course. I'll take note of the Laredo thing; hopefully, sometime next month I'll have some time to dedicate to it.
NEITHER 270 PARK AVENUE, OR I WORLD TRADE CENTER IS THE TALLEST. NEW YORK'S TALLEST BUILDING IS, THE NORDSTRUM BUILDING, (AKA) THE CENTRAL PARK TOWER, 1,550 FEET BY ROOF HEIGHT. THEN THE SECOND TALLEST IS, III WEST 57th STREET (AKA) THE STIENWAY TOWER, 1,478 FEET, NEX IS THE VANDERBILT BUILDING, 1,401 FEET TALL, AND FINALLY, THERE'S 432 PARK AVENUE, AT 1,398 FEET TALL.
Hey Mr. Magnitudes😎👍🏼🗽 This is excellent! Are these new 3🏙️from scratch? Also, did you write the script too? PS - ever think of doing 3 + 4 wtc (to go w 1)? I’m going to shoot you an email later today A solemn day for sure😔🙏🏻🌎😓 Phenomenal job🙂👍🏼👍🏼
Man, my friend! You've been missed. Thank you so much, I'm glad you liked it. As for the new towers, I haven’t had time for more, so they’re 3D Warehouse models that I’ve modified a bit here and there depending on how they originally looked. As for the script, well, yes, but it’s nothing memorable either, haha. And no, honestly, if I don’t have much love for the OWTC anymore, I have even less for the rest, so it hasn’t crossed my mind to do it. But if it excites you, let me know, and I’ll make the effort. I’m looking forward to your email. As for the date... yes, it’s a day that says a lot, and none of it good.
@@Magnitudx ok - it will be later on though. PS - I thought the script was pretty professional. 😎👍🏼 A lot of anniversary videos online + events today too. . . survivor stories keep coming all these years later.✌🏼🕊️
Missed an opportunity to put 2 World Trade Center into the video. Looks like it might FINALLY happen with American Express as the anchor tenant!
It will be in the next one.
american express as tenant for 2wtc? really???
@@MartinRichardiWho cares, atleast it will (or might) FINALLY get built!
It’s not finalized, I been following skyscraper development since 2008 and one thing is don’t get your hopes up too early.
175 park ave is so royal and beautiful
270 Park Avenue is my favorite currently I am glad I videoed it rise into the skyline.
I like what you do. In fact, I had already seen some of your videos. You keep us updated on the skyline from the other shore.
@@Magnitudx thanks friend.
nice work: thank you :-)
Dude, nearly 200ft of the top of 270 Park is all vanity mechanical height.
Nova York a mais bonita e melhor cidade do mundo. 🌎
It would be cool to see modern twintowers or twin one wtcs here...
It is a little insensitive to build it in front of Chrysler Building.
I think the spire on OWTC is an advanced technology with a power and not just something to boost the height. Both OWTC and 270 Park are gorgeous and fascinating architectural designs.
I'm not impartial about this; from my point of view, everything was done in the worst possible way in this building, from the awarding process to the design. And regarding what you mentioned, I think everything on the antenna could have been placed inside a parapet or integrated into the building without being exposed on a simple mast. In any case, I think the CTBUH was very 'lenient' in admitting that the antenna was a spire, and therefore, I believe it should never have counted as the official architectural height. But again, it might be my own issue, and I may no longer be objective when evaluating this building.
@@Magnitudx Maybe it wasn't a perfect process but America was at war after 9/11. The OWTC is an architectural achievement because it was erected during war and built from ashes. The building of OWTC and WTC after 9/11 is meaningful and left an unforgettable mark on history hence 1,776 ft tall with the spire. I think the spire is an advanced technology for nuclear power and it needs to be outside. Maybe it shoots laser beams into the sky to create clouds/rain/lightening/electricity. Maybe it's a device with electromagnetic powers or a weapon like a death ray. The way antennas need to be on a roof or telescopes on top of mountains or in the atmosphere, the spire needs to be on top of a building at a high altitude so it can work. I do not believe at all the spire was placed there to boost the height. If you stack all the WTC buildings how high would that be? Do you really think that height could not be accomplished without the spire?
5:43 is it really gonna have a stone facade at it's base?
Yes, that's how it's planned for now, but we'll see how it turns out in the end.
a4.pbase.com/o12/06/102706/1/174804985.J5hXUkqU.FosterandPartners3.png
Wish I could stay alive to continue seeing this city evolve. I'll probably be 40 or 50 if and when tower 5th and 175 will be built.
Sure! That's nothing. And after that, there will still be much more ahead that you have to see.
It's mind boggling to me that they're willing to build such beautiful skyscrapers yet are held back by symbolism because of not wanting to go higher than the one World Trade Centre if I was building a high rise I wouldn't give a shit how fuking tall I had to go I wouldn't allow a certain height to stop me
Only one city on earth has at least eight skyscrapers that are at least 1200 feet / 364 m tall: New York City! I was there 2 weeks ago, and the skyscrapers, along with the retail, energy, bridges, rivers and restaurants, were wonderful. In my opinion, Central Park Tower is the tallest building in NYC. It has a roof that is over 100 feet / 30 m taller than 1 WTC. 1 WTC has a huge spire, that, technically, makes it taller. Central Park Tower was in the video, and is the tallest residential building on earth, and the tallest, by roof height, outside of Asia.
I thought there were plenty of buildings over 364 meters in other cities
Yes, there are three cities (Edited: Incorrect, with over 1,200 feet, only NYC) that meet that criterion: Hong Kong, Shenzhen, and NYC.
@@fabbieduckieofficial4073 8 of them? Source?
@@Magnitudx false. Hong Kong has 4. Just checked on 3 websites.
@@scottwood928 My apologies. You're absolutely right, I was wrong. And not just about that, Shenzhen won’t meet the criteria until next year either. So your statement is absolutely correct: The Big Apple still holds that title. And with what’s coming in the next few years, it’s only going to get better.
Nyc's skyline is getting crazier everyday yearbut i think it's losing its skyline quality due to having to find whatever spots are available for the next tallest buildings. When you're on Manhattan however, it will only look better.
The rendering you did of the building was fantastic, but that font coloration and the confusing reflections of it is weird and ugly. I’d suggest a solid white, keeping the same font. Also the flare flourishes and the font taking up half the screen when looking up at the building was very distracting
Hi again, why not you make it this same view video is: Taipei 101 vs Merdeka 118?
why? The video is set in The USA, not in Taiwan or Malaysia.
I'll jot it down, @Vernon1176
@@scottwood928 I know that then why u asking
me? Because I not asking u but thank u 😁
Visual effects are rather distracting.
why do they have to put the commrae tower near the crysler building like that though and now it going to look like an L where the super tall skyscrapers are going to be at due to the street that lead to grand central and billionaire row
Hey how do you do that? Also can you try the twin towers in Laredo Texas?
With the help of Blender and Resolve, mainly, and some work, of course. I'll take note of the Laredo thing; hopefully, sometime next month I'll have some time to dedicate to it.
@@Magnitudx oh wow. Also thanks
Still like 1WTC better. 270 Blocks the Chrysler Building.
NEITHER 270 PARK AVENUE, OR I WORLD TRADE CENTER IS THE TALLEST. NEW YORK'S TALLEST BUILDING IS, THE NORDSTRUM BUILDING, (AKA) THE CENTRAL PARK TOWER, 1,550 FEET BY ROOF HEIGHT. THEN THE SECOND TALLEST IS, III WEST 57th STREET (AKA) THE STIENWAY TOWER, 1,478 FEET, NEX IS THE VANDERBILT BUILDING, 1,401 FEET TALL, AND FINALLY, THERE'S 432 PARK AVENUE, AT 1,398 FEET TALL.
270 looks like complete shit along with the other megatall skyscrapers
Hey Mr. Magnitudes😎👍🏼🗽
This is excellent! Are these new 3🏙️from scratch?
Also, did you write the script too?
PS - ever think of doing 3 + 4 wtc (to go w 1)?
I’m going to shoot you an email later today
A solemn day for sure😔🙏🏻🌎😓
Phenomenal job🙂👍🏼👍🏼
Man, my friend! You've been missed. Thank you so much, I'm glad you liked it.
As for the new towers, I haven’t had time for more, so they’re 3D Warehouse models that I’ve modified a bit here and there depending on how they originally looked. As for the script, well, yes, but it’s nothing memorable either, haha. And no, honestly, if I don’t have much love for the OWTC anymore, I have even less for the rest, so it hasn’t crossed my mind to do it. But if it excites you, let me know, and I’ll make the effort. I’m looking forward to your email. As for the date... yes, it’s a day that says a lot, and none of it good.
@@Magnitudx ok - it will be later on though. PS - I thought the script was pretty professional. 😎👍🏼 A lot of anniversary videos online + events today too. . . survivor stories keep coming all these years later.✌🏼🕊️
@@Magnitudxwhat the program you use
@MitchellBPYao Mainly, Blender.
So so Sad. New York Must have a Building like Burj Azizi