Couple of updates: Jan Hus didnt refuse to recant his views. He refused to agree that he had actually taught the things of which he was accused. Secondly, under JP2, the catholic church issued a formal apology for Hus' condemnation in 1999
Interesting but one of the things Jan Hus stated was that every 'believer in Christ' is part of 'the Church' (which I believe but the Catholics don't so why would they apologise for that I wonder?).
Condemned articles of J. Hus (These are not everything Hus taught, only what the council of constance officially condemned him for) 1. There is only one holy universal church, which is the total number of those predestined to salvation. It therefore follows that the universal holy church is only one, inasmuch as there is only one number of all those who are predestined to salvation. 2. Paul was never a member of the devil, even though he did certain acts which are similar to the acts of the church's enemies. 3. Those foreknown as damned are not parts of the church, for no part of the church can finally fall away from it, since the predestinating love that binds the church together does not fail. 4. The two natures, the divinity and the humanity, are one Christ. 5. A person foreknown to damnation is never part of the holy church, even if he is in a state of grace according to present justice; a person predestined to salvation always remains a member of the church, even though he may fall away for a time from adventitious grace, for he keeps the grace of predestination. 6. The church is an article of faith in the following sense: to regard it as the convocation of those predestined to salvation, whether or not it be in a state of grace according to present justice. 7. Peter neither was nor is the head of the holy catholic church. 8. Priests who live in vice in any way pollute the power of the priesthood, and like unfaithful sons are untrustworthy in their thinking about the church's seven sacraments, about the keys, offices, censures, customs, ceremonies and sacred things of the church, about the veneration of relics, and about indulgences and orders. 9. The papal dignity originated with the emperor, and the primacy and institution of the pope emanated from imperial power. 10. Nobody would reasonably assert of himself or of another, without revelation, that he was the head of a particular holy church; nor is the Roman pontiff the head of the Roman church. 11. It is not necessary to believe that any particular Roman pontiff is the head of any particular holy church, unless God has predestined him to salvation. 12. Nobody holds the place of Christ or of Peter unless he follows his way of life, since there is no other discipleship that is more appropriate nor is there another way to receive delegated power from God, since there is required for this office of vicar a similar way of life as well as the authority of the one instituting. 13. The pope is not the manifest and true successor of the prince of the apostles, Peter, if he lives in a way contrary to Peter's. If he seeks avarice, he is the vicar of Judas Iscariot. Likewise, cardinals are not the manifest and true successors of the college of Christ's other apostles unless they live after the manner of the apostles, keeping the commandments and counsels of our lord Jesus Christ. 14. Doctors who state that anybody subjected to ecclesiastical censure, if he refuses to be corrected, should be handed over to the judgment of the secular authority, are undoubtedly following in this the chief priests, the scribes and the pharisees who handed over to the secular authority Christ himself, since he was unwilling to obey them in all things, saying, It is not lawful for us to put any man to death; these gave him to the civil judge, so that such men are even greater murderers than Pilate. 15. Ecclesiastical obedience was invented by the church's priests, without the express authority of scripture. 16. The immediate division of human actions is between those that are virtuous and those that are wicked. Therefore, if a man is wicked and does something, he acts wickedly; if he is virtuous and does something, he acts virtuously. For just as wickedness, which is called crime or mortal sin, infects all the acts of a wicked man, so virtue gives life to all the acts of a virtuous man. 17. A priest of Christ who lives according to his law, knows scripture and has a desire to edify the people, ought to preach, notwithstanding a pretended excommunication. And further on: if the pope or any superior orders a priest so disposed not to preach, the subordinate ought not to obey. 18. Whoever enters the priesthood receives a binding duty to preach; and this mandate ought to be carried out, notwithstanding a pretended excommunication. 19. By the church's censures of excommunication, suspension and interdict the clergy subdue the laity, for the sake of their own exaltation, multiply avarice protect wickedness and prepare the way for antichrist. The clear sign of this is the fact that these censures come from antichrist. In the legal proceedings of the clergy they are called fulminations, which are the principal means whereby the clergy proceed against those who uncover antichrist's wickedness, which the clergy has for the most part usurped for itself. 20. If the pope is wicked, and especially if he is foreknown to damnation, then he is a devil like Judas the apostle, a thief and a son of perdition and is not the head of the holy church militant since he is not even a member of it. 21. The grace of predestination is the bond whereby the body of the church and each of its members is indissolubly joined with the head. 22. The pope or a prelate who is wicked and foreknown to damnation is a pastor only in an equivocal sense, and truly is a thief and a robber. 23. The pope ought not to be called "most holy" even by reason of his office, for otherwise even a king ought to be called "most holy" by reason of his office and executioners and heralds ought to be called "holy", indeed even the devil would be called "holy" since he is an official of God. 24. If a pope lives contrary to Christ, even if he has risen through a right and legitimate election according to the established human constitution, he would have risen by a way other than through Christ, even granted that he entered upon office by an election that had been made principally by God. For, Judas Iscariot was rightly and legitimately elected to be an apostle by Jesus Christ who is God, yet he climbed into the sheepfold by another way. 25. The condemnation of the forty-five articles of John Wyclif, decreed by the doctors, is irrational and unjust and badly done and the reason alleged by them is feigned, namely that none of them is catholic but each one is either heretical or erroneous or scandalous. 26. The viva voce agreement upon some person, made according to human custom by the electors or by the greater part of them, does not mean by itself that the person has been legitimately elected or that by this very fact he is the true and manifest successor or vicar of the apostle Peter or of another apostle in an ecclesiastical office. For, it is to the works of the one elected that we should look irrespective of whether the manner of the election was good or bad. For, the more plentifully a person acts meritoriously towards building up the church, the more copiously does he thereby have power from God for this. 27. There is not the least proof that there must be one head ruling the church in spiritual matters who always lives with the church militant. 28. Christ would govern his church better by his true disciples scattered throughout the world, without these monstrous heads. 29. The apostles and faithful priests of the Lord strenuously governed the church in matters necessary for salvation before the office of pope was introduced, and they would continue to do this until the day of judgment if-which is very possible-there is no pope. 30. Nobody is a civil lord, a prelate or a bishop while he is in mortal sin. Source: www.ewtn.com/catholicism/library/council-of-constance-1459
Another fantastic addition to my favorite series. I really love the storyline where henry and godwin get shrunk and godwin lets henry do a jan hus sermons.
the history version of Jan Hus he was burned and sigismund was watcing him burn perry this version tells the smallest details some inportant things in history are not totally told like i had a ww2 lesson and we did that in like 2 lessons of history and ofcccccccccccc the teatcher will tell you everything about the first civilazation how the first ppl buil theyre houses fro wood and crap i find this very weird cuz u will have more situations in yur life whan someone asks u what u think about how hitler took over the whole europe or how he attacled russia with 3 million man and than lost againts the savage stalin that ditint care about human lifes
Thank you very much for this video. I remember the references from the game, but never really understood the significance. In sure they are setting something up for the sequel.
You're very welcome! I agree. I am hoping that they focussed on Hus as much as they did so it would make sense for the sequel to have something to do with the Hussite Wars.
Even today Jan Hus is described as ascetic, very thin, old man. He was neither. During his time at the Prague University he used to go out with students and other academics (drinking a lot), later when he was preaching in Prague and other places he was know for his love of good food. And because he was so loved, people used to bring him some good food. At the time of his awful death Jan Hus was 46 years old (young).
Jan Hus story is tragic. It is a shame that his lawyer, Jan Jesenice, and his stupendous feats of courage borne of friendship toward Jan Hus and probably to an unerring love of God, have all but been forgotten. Jan Jesenice was martyred and tortured to death while being held hostage by Ulrich II von Rosenberg.
The means and manner of Huss' Execution is grotesque to us today, but sadly was commonly used by the Civil authorities in and after the Middle Ages, Protestants used the same tactics. But what was missed in the interest of context, is that there were different groups of Hussites who in following Jan Huss went far beyond the whitewashed history in which we paint these "reformers" as great biblical scholars, who raised their voices against Catholic errors. Let's not forget that his followers, led by other priests who like himself had left the priesthood and gathered the peasants to reject the Church had been involved in expelling priests from churches, and gathered what were described violent mobs in doing so. There is also a difficulty when it comes to Hagiographies written by both sides. When someone of the stature of Huss, or choose any Catholic who battled Protestantism are written, we see the supporters almost always giving us a picture of someone who is without blame, pure in spirit and deed, humble and having a full and total devotion to God. They counter with the attacks both honest, excessive and fictional in which we see the end result among some that would make Q-Anon conspiracists blush. An example would be some of the paranoid teachings my SDA neighbors have that Jesuits spy on SDA congregants and have a plan to one day martyr their membership by slitting their throats with specially designed knives. There are also the claims that the Jesuits duped Mohommed into founding Islam by having a nun seduce him and giving him the Koran, which the Jesuits really wrote or influenced. (How this happened almost 700 years before the lifetime of Loyola and founding of the Jesuits is still a bit fuzzy) So I think a total acceptance of all what are presented as firsthand accounts and hagiographies is a bit naive if not outright dangerous.
Jan Hus preached the Gospel in the vernacular at the Bethlehem Church in prague and the catholic church wanted it done in Latin. Jan Hus set the people free that the catholic church wanted enslaved. And for that they saw themselves avenged in burning him alive as a public spectacle of humiliation, planned long in advance and torturing him before hand. His brilliant lawyer and friend, Jan Jesenice was held by Ulrich II von Rosenberg, tortured and killed as well. Jan Hus had nothing to do with the uprising that took place after his murder. Ostensibly the insurrections were planned to give Christ a bad name, which is nothing new. The world has always been anti-Christ. And still is.
Well, yes. Historically speaking, people have always been ostracized and silenced for viewpoints that stray outside the accepted norm of any institution. I think the difference in the modern age is that "cancelling" is a weapon to be used against people based on thought crime or less.
To this day, July 6th is a national public holiday in Czech Republic, celebrating this great man who hasn’t bent his knee to the corruption of the church. And there is a hussite church where Christian women can become priests and can be married, while the church members can receive a holy communion of both bread and wine, unlike in the catholic church. Whenever I met a hussite, they were upright and tolerant people who would live by the principle of not judging others and just living their own lives by the commandments of their religion. Peace and respect.
Just so you know, The Holy Catholic Church has been distributing the Body and Blood of Christ to everyone who is in communion with the church since the second vatican council. And, the blood was distributed at high masses from the second century onward.
@@ParryThis that’s news to me - I’ve been to a bunch of Catholic masses and they never gave wine to everyone, only the priest drank it. And that was the situation in the times of Hus as well, otherwise he wouldn’t have to demand that they give it to everyone…which was also one of his points that were condemned as heresy. But to be honest, I am not sure about what the situation was in other times, especially with early Christians (in the 2nd century, these were not Catholics yet, just Christians, as the divisions within Christendom only came later). And to be precise, I assume we’re talking about Roman Catholics and I’m not sure about Greek or other Catholic churches.
@@SirMikeSelf Yes, I am referring to the Roman Catholic Church. As for not being granted the Blood of Christ, the official doctrine is that Christ is 100% present in both the body and blood, so receiving either is fully participating in the sacrament of the Eucharist. It is up to the Priest's discretion whether or not to serve the Blood at Mass. Recently, many have not, given the transmission of germs involved with a whole congregation sharing a single cup.
@@ParryThis ok, I didn’t know that the priest has a free decision in this matter, nor have I ever heard of a Roman Catholic priest who would give both body and blood to everyone. The reasons of hygiene are obvious these days, that’s true. I attended a Catholic funeral including a mass during the first covid wave and the priest there would even wash his hands in alcohol after giving each person the bread, before moving on to the next one.
@@SirMikeSelf Yes, it has been some time since i have been to a Mass where, we were able to receive the Blood of Christ. Its unlikely with the way things are going, public health wise, that we will see a return to normalcy regarding the Eucharist any time soon.
@@ParryThis actually the Faculty of Arts (nowadays called the Faculty of Philosophy) of Charles University is right across the street from that concert hall. And just around the corner from there you have the Old Town Square with a statue of Hus in its centre and the nearby church where Hus used to preach (as well as the town hall where officials were thrown out of windows by protesters after Hus’s execution, starting the Hussite wars). PS: in this very concert hall, the entire soundtrack for Kingdom Come Deliverance was recorded.
Why do you insist of using a picture of a 19th century concert hall (the Rudolfinum) as a picture representing the Prague University which has nothing to do with it?
I mean, he certainly wasn't a god. Most modern christians recognize that what he wanted to change in the church was for the better. In fact, as far as i know, not long after Jan Hus' death, the Catholic Church in Rome made nearly all of the changes that the original hussites wanted, recognizing that they were in line with original church doctrine.
@@GAMER123GAMING A nuisance he preached to a bunch of peasants in Prague hardly a reason to burn a man alive and by doing so they created a bunch of extremists who ruined most of Bohemia probably why the Austrians swallowed it up successfully for so long and the fact the that in the Catholic counter revolution in response to the Protestant revolution was basically them doing exactly what Hus said to don't seem like badly thought out ideas to me if the Church adopted them after.
Couple of updates: Jan Hus didnt refuse to recant his views. He refused to agree that he had actually taught the things of which he was accused.
Secondly, under JP2, the catholic church issued a formal apology for Hus' condemnation in 1999
I am familiar with the apology for Hus' condemnation.
Hmmm i wonder why they would issue a formal apology for that bastard
@@GAMER123GAMING because Hus was right about the Catholics even to this day and they knew it.
Interesting but one of the things Jan Hus stated was that every 'believer in Christ' is part of 'the Church' (which I believe but the Catholics don't so why would they apologise for that I wonder?).
@@candyclews4047 They were probably apologising for strapping him to a pile of timber and literally burning him alive for thinking. Lol.
Condemned articles of J. Hus (These are not everything Hus taught, only what the council of constance officially condemned him for)
1. There is only one holy universal church, which is the total number of those predestined to salvation. It therefore follows that the universal holy church is only one, inasmuch as there is only one number of all those who are predestined to salvation.
2. Paul was never a member of the devil, even though he did certain acts which are similar to the acts of the church's enemies.
3. Those foreknown as damned are not parts of the church, for no part of the church can finally fall away from it, since the predestinating love that binds the church together does not fail.
4. The two natures, the divinity and the humanity, are one Christ.
5. A person foreknown to damnation is never part of the holy church, even if he is in a state of grace according to present justice; a person predestined to salvation always remains a member of the church, even though he may fall away for a time from adventitious grace, for he keeps the grace of predestination.
6. The church is an article of faith in the following sense: to regard it as the convocation of those predestined to salvation, whether or not it be in a state of grace according to present justice.
7. Peter neither was nor is the head of the holy catholic church.
8. Priests who live in vice in any way pollute the power of the priesthood, and like unfaithful sons are untrustworthy in their thinking about the church's seven sacraments, about the keys, offices, censures, customs, ceremonies and sacred things of the church, about the veneration of relics, and about indulgences and orders.
9. The papal dignity originated with the emperor, and the primacy and institution of the pope emanated from imperial power.
10. Nobody would reasonably assert of himself or of another, without revelation, that he was the head of a particular holy church; nor is the Roman pontiff the head of the Roman church.
11. It is not necessary to believe that any particular Roman pontiff is the head of any particular holy church, unless God has predestined him to salvation.
12. Nobody holds the place of Christ or of Peter unless he follows his way of life, since there is no other discipleship that is more appropriate nor is there another way to receive delegated power from God, since there is required for this office of vicar a similar way of life as well as the authority of the one instituting.
13. The pope is not the manifest and true successor of the prince of the apostles, Peter, if he lives in a way contrary to Peter's. If he seeks avarice, he is the vicar of Judas Iscariot. Likewise, cardinals are not the manifest and true successors of the college of Christ's other apostles unless they live after the manner of the apostles, keeping the commandments and counsels of our lord Jesus Christ.
14. Doctors who state that anybody subjected to ecclesiastical censure, if he refuses to be corrected, should be handed over to the judgment of the secular authority, are undoubtedly following in this the chief priests, the scribes and the pharisees who handed over to the secular authority Christ himself, since he was unwilling to obey them in all things, saying, It is not lawful for us to put any man to death; these gave him to the civil judge, so that such men are even greater murderers than Pilate.
15. Ecclesiastical obedience was invented by the church's priests, without the express authority of scripture.
16. The immediate division of human actions is between those that are virtuous and those that are wicked. Therefore, if a man is wicked and does something, he acts wickedly; if he is virtuous and does something, he acts virtuously. For just as wickedness, which is called crime or mortal sin, infects all the acts of a wicked man, so virtue gives life to all the acts of a virtuous man.
17. A priest of Christ who lives according to his law, knows scripture and has a desire to edify the people, ought to preach, notwithstanding a pretended excommunication. And further on: if the pope or any superior orders a priest so disposed not to preach, the subordinate ought not to obey.
18. Whoever enters the priesthood receives a binding duty to preach; and this mandate ought to be carried out, notwithstanding a pretended excommunication.
19. By the church's censures of excommunication, suspension and interdict the clergy subdue the laity, for the sake of their own exaltation, multiply avarice protect wickedness and prepare the way for antichrist. The clear sign of this is the fact that these censures come from antichrist. In the legal proceedings of the clergy they are called fulminations, which are the principal means whereby the clergy proceed against those who uncover antichrist's wickedness, which the clergy has for the most part usurped for itself.
20. If the pope is wicked, and especially if he is foreknown to damnation, then he is a devil like Judas the apostle, a thief and a son of perdition and is not the head of the holy church militant since he is not even a member of it.
21. The grace of predestination is the bond whereby the body of the church and each of its members is indissolubly joined with the head.
22. The pope or a prelate who is wicked and foreknown to damnation is a pastor only in an equivocal sense, and truly is a thief and a robber.
23. The pope ought not to be called "most holy" even by reason of his office, for otherwise even a king ought to be called "most holy" by reason of his office and executioners and heralds ought to be called "holy", indeed even the devil would be called "holy" since he is an official of God.
24. If a pope lives contrary to Christ, even if he has risen through a right and legitimate election according to the established human constitution, he would have risen by a way other than through Christ, even granted that he entered upon office by an election that had been made principally by God. For, Judas Iscariot was rightly and legitimately elected to be an apostle by Jesus Christ who is God, yet he climbed into the sheepfold by another way.
25. The condemnation of the forty-five articles of John Wyclif, decreed by the doctors, is irrational and unjust and badly done and the reason alleged by them is feigned, namely that none of them is catholic but each one is either heretical or erroneous or scandalous.
26. The viva voce agreement upon some person, made according to human custom by the electors or by the greater part of them, does not mean by itself that the person has been legitimately elected or that by this very fact he is the true and manifest successor or vicar of the apostle Peter or of another apostle in an ecclesiastical office. For, it is to the works of the one elected that we should look irrespective of whether the manner of the election was good or bad. For, the more plentifully a person acts meritoriously towards building up the church, the more copiously does he thereby have power from God for this.
27. There is not the least proof that there must be one head ruling the church in spiritual matters who always lives with the church militant.
28. Christ would govern his church better by his true disciples scattered throughout the world, without these monstrous heads.
29. The apostles and faithful priests of the Lord strenuously governed the church in matters necessary for salvation before the office of pope was introduced, and they would continue to do this until the day of judgment if-which is very possible-there is no pope.
30. Nobody is a civil lord, a prelate or a bishop while he is in mortal sin.
Source: www.ewtn.com/catholicism/library/council-of-constance-1459
He is kinda giving eastern orthodox vibes
@@Duxmamalakishe basically sounds like a calvinist to me
This was a great video. I like how you can take topics like this and make them enjoyable and understandable.
Glad you enjoyed it! I certainly try to make history as fun to learn as possible.
Been waiting for this vid much impressed good job DTG
Glad you enjoyed!
Another fantastic addition to my favorite series. I really love the storyline where henry and godwin get shrunk and godwin lets henry do a jan hus sermons.
I don't know about you but Kcd is my favourite game. Just saying lol
Couldn't agree more! That storyline was a lot of fun.
i literlly learned about him at school
@@abioticguide9240i perfer rdr2 or grand theft auto but kcd is like my 3th fav game
the history version of Jan Hus he was burned and sigismund was watcing him burn perry this version tells the smallest details some inportant things in history are not totally told like i had a ww2 lesson and we did that in like 2 lessons of history and ofcccccccccccc the teatcher will tell you everything about the first civilazation how the first ppl buil theyre houses fro wood and crap i find this very weird cuz u will have more situations in yur life whan someone asks u what u think about how hitler took over the whole europe or how he attacled russia with 3 million man and than lost againts the savage stalin that ditint care about human lifes
Love your videos. Maybe the next game puts us in the shoes of an older Henry in the Hussite wars.
I hope we will see Hussite Wars in KCD 2
You didnt include a link to the 30 articles.
thanks for this video, concise yet very informative .
Thank you very much for this video. I remember the references from the game, but never really understood the significance. In sure they are setting something up for the sequel.
You're very welcome! I agree. I am hoping that they focussed on Hus as much as they did so it would make sense for the sequel to have something to do with the Hussite Wars.
Husinec. Goosetown.
The burning of Hus is the meaning for the saying "Your goose is cooked".
Awesome video, the information was incredible. Thanks so much!
Glad you enjoyed it!
He comes up in the priest of uzhitz quest if you agree to drink with him. You end up giving a sermon preaching his ideas.
Yeah, that was funny. They presented it as Henry’s improv when it was in fact Hus’ preaching.
Jan Hus is right. Jesus is the only way.
Even today Jan Hus is described as ascetic, very thin, old man. He was neither. During his time at the Prague University he used to go out with students and other academics (drinking a lot), later when he was preaching in Prague and other places he was know for his love of good food. And because he was so loved, people used to bring him some good food. At the time of his awful death Jan Hus was 46 years old (young).
Where are the thirty articles of heresy that were promised at the 9-minute mark?
Sorry, this is a reupload, and i forgot to re add them back into the description.
And now, i can't find the article that i had originally linked.
Praise the Lord for brave men such as Jan Hus. Down with the Papacy!
When you say Prague University, you're showing a concert hall called Rudolfinum. :)
Jan Hus story is tragic. It is a shame that his lawyer, Jan Jesenice, and his stupendous feats of courage borne of friendship toward Jan Hus and probably to an unerring love of God, have all but been forgotten. Jan Jesenice was martyred and tortured to death while being held hostage by Ulrich II von Rosenberg.
Imagine murdering someone over disagreeing about the details of the invisible man in the sky.
The means and manner of Huss' Execution is grotesque to us today, but sadly was commonly used by the Civil authorities in and after the Middle Ages, Protestants used the same tactics. But what was missed in the interest of context, is that there were different groups of Hussites who in following Jan Huss went far beyond the whitewashed history in which we paint these "reformers" as great biblical scholars, who raised their voices against Catholic errors. Let's not forget that his followers, led by other priests who like himself had left the priesthood and gathered the peasants to reject the Church had been involved in expelling priests from churches, and gathered what were described violent mobs in doing so.
There is also a difficulty when it comes to Hagiographies written by both sides. When someone of the stature of Huss, or choose any Catholic who battled Protestantism are written, we see the supporters almost always giving us a picture of someone who is without blame, pure in spirit and deed, humble and having a full and total devotion to God. They counter with the attacks both honest, excessive and fictional in which we see the end result among some that would make Q-Anon conspiracists blush. An example would be some of the paranoid teachings my SDA neighbors have that Jesuits spy on SDA congregants and have a plan to one day martyr their membership by slitting their throats with specially designed knives. There are also the claims that the Jesuits duped Mohommed into founding Islam by having a nun seduce him and giving him the Koran, which the Jesuits really wrote or influenced. (How this happened almost 700 years before the lifetime of Loyola and founding of the Jesuits is still a bit fuzzy) So I think a total acceptance of all what are presented as firsthand accounts and hagiographies is a bit naive if not outright dangerous.
I agree with what you say about the burning of a man alive to be grotesque. But what about abortion? Why is that not grotesque to us today?
Jan Hus preached the Gospel in the vernacular at the Bethlehem Church in prague and the catholic church wanted it done in Latin. Jan Hus set the people free that the catholic church wanted enslaved. And for that they saw themselves avenged in burning him alive as a public spectacle of humiliation, planned long in advance and torturing him before hand. His brilliant lawyer and friend, Jan Jesenice was held by Ulrich II von Rosenberg, tortured and killed as well.
Jan Hus had nothing to do with the uprising that took place after his murder. Ostensibly the insurrections were planned to give Christ a bad name, which is nothing new. The world has always been anti-Christ. And still is.
No king. Burnt messiah. Emperor and Pope as the Beast at the gates. The Kingdom Come for sure for people of Bohemia in those days...
cancel culture has been around a long time
Well, yes. Historically speaking, people have always been ostracized and silenced for viewpoints that stray outside the accepted norm of any institution. I think the difference in the modern age is that "cancelling" is a weapon to be used against people based on thought crime or less.
Yes now you see book banning in the US by Neo Nazi MAGA. Very true.
To this day, July 6th is a national public holiday in Czech Republic, celebrating this great man who hasn’t bent his knee to the corruption of the church. And there is a hussite church where Christian women can become priests and can be married, while the church members can receive a holy communion of both bread and wine, unlike in the catholic church. Whenever I met a hussite, they were upright and tolerant people who would live by the principle of not judging others and just living their own lives by the commandments of their religion. Peace and respect.
Just so you know, The Holy Catholic Church has been distributing the Body and Blood of Christ to everyone who is in communion with the church since the second vatican council. And, the blood was distributed at high masses from the second century onward.
@@ParryThis that’s news to me - I’ve been to a bunch of Catholic masses and they never gave wine to everyone, only the priest drank it. And that was the situation in the times of Hus as well, otherwise he wouldn’t have to demand that they give it to everyone…which was also one of his points that were condemned as heresy. But to be honest, I am not sure about what the situation was in other times, especially with early Christians (in the 2nd century, these were not Catholics yet, just Christians, as the divisions within Christendom only came later). And to be precise, I assume we’re talking about Roman Catholics and I’m not sure about Greek or other Catholic churches.
@@SirMikeSelf Yes, I am referring to the Roman Catholic Church. As for not being granted the Blood of Christ, the official doctrine is that Christ is 100% present in both the body and blood, so receiving either is fully participating in the sacrament of the Eucharist. It is up to the Priest's discretion whether or not to serve the Blood at Mass. Recently, many have not, given the transmission of germs involved with a whole congregation sharing a single cup.
@@ParryThis ok, I didn’t know that the priest has a free decision in this matter, nor have I ever heard of a Roman Catholic priest who would give both body and blood to everyone. The reasons of hygiene are obvious these days, that’s true. I attended a Catholic funeral including a mass during the first covid wave and the priest there would even wash his hands in alcohol after giving each person the bread, before moving on to the next one.
@@SirMikeSelf Yes, it has been some time since i have been to a Mass where, we were able to receive the Blood of Christ. Its unlikely with the way things are going, public health wise, that we will see a return to normalcy regarding the Eucharist any time soon.
The picture of the building in 1:36 is a concert halls and not a university
Yeah, i used the wrong image there, but i've never been to Prague, so it shouldn't be surprising that i would make a small mistake like that.
@@ParryThis actually the Faculty of Arts (nowadays called the Faculty of Philosophy) of Charles University is right across the street from that concert hall. And just around the corner from there you have the Old Town Square with a statue of Hus in its centre and the nearby church where Hus used to preach (as well as the town hall where officials were thrown out of windows by protesters after Hus’s execution, starting the Hussite wars).
PS: in this very concert hall, the entire soundtrack for Kingdom Come Deliverance was recorded.
en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Karolinum
What's with the dashcam backgrounds, you do realis it distracts from an otherwise decent video.
It helps zoomers concentrate.
Its not a backround its game footage@@Maxშემიწყალე
Why do you insist of using a picture of a 19th century concert hall (the Rudolfinum) as a picture representing the Prague University which has nothing to do with it?
Western schism vid?
Yes, i will be doing that in the coming weeks. Hope to see you there.
YEET
YOTE
@@ParryThis um... yeet?
double down KFC! HAHAH! ur hilarious
janhuß was the god on the earth !!! he died for all !!! the white swan is upstanding 4.4.2021
I mean, he certainly wasn't a god. Most modern christians recognize that what he wanted to change in the church was for the better. In fact, as far as i know, not long after Jan Hus' death, the Catholic Church in Rome made nearly all of the changes that the original hussites wanted, recognizing that they were in line with original church doctrine.
Being a nuisance with no proper points doesn't make you a god
@@GAMER123GAMING A nuisance he preached to a bunch of peasants in Prague hardly a reason to burn a man alive and by doing so they created a bunch of extremists who ruined most of Bohemia probably why the Austrians swallowed it up successfully for so long and the fact the that in the Catholic counter revolution in response to the Protestant revolution was basically them doing exactly what Hus said to don't seem like badly thought out ideas to me if the Church adopted them after.
@@melkormorgothbauglir.4848 L bozo