Planck's approach was to analyze the entropy of blackbody radiation as a function of energy. To make both high-frequency and low-frequency data consistent with the Second Law of Thermodynamics, he included an additional "guess" term proportional to the frequency (hf); this results in Planck's Law. Planck's application of Boltzmann's Statistical Mechanics to justify his guess then led to his revolutionary conclusion that the material of the walls emit and absorb radiation in discrete quanta. A paper titled "Planck’s Route to the Black Body Radiation Formula and Quantization" by Michael Fowler (7/25/08) gives a nice discussion.
"When we turn our attention to the general case of electrodynamics ... our first impression is surprise at the enormous complexity of the problems to be solved.", Max Planck (1932), quoted at the opening of Chapter 15 "General Electromagnetic Fields" in Andrew Zangwill's "Modern Electrodynamics".
"Electromagnetic Fields and Waves" by Lorrain & Corson (2nd Edition) contains a problem in chapter 2 "Electrostatic Fields in a Vacuum" (2-19) on J.J. Thomson's "Plum Pudding" model of the atom. It asks to (A) find the force on an electron; (B) describe its motion; (C) the frequency for a 1 Angstrom-sized atom; and (D) compare this frequency to that of visible light. A rather thought-provoking question in an Undergraduate E&M textbook!
You have to spend "big sums of money" to learn high-school-level math? There are free textbooks and tons of free videos... It's impressive that Feynman taught himself and at such a young age, but anyone could teach themselves that, just not as fast or at such a young age.
I am not trying to criticize but I feel offended why Sir Nikola Tesla is forgotten in here.. He was not only forgotten during his time for his opposition to Sir Thomas Edison but also today after his great contributions to the world and all of the grid and every electrical appliance is a manifestation of his work on physics. He invented the microphone and started the idea of wireless charging.... Although a huge fan of sir Richard P Feynmann, I feel that Sir Nikola Tesla can displace Sir Richard P Feynmann in this Video...
The problem with this video is that it completely skips all the "ancient" scientists. It is true that it may be difficult to state if that result was effectively obtained by that scientist, but in any case you cannot exclude from the list Eratosthenes, Anaximander, Archimedes,... Also more modern physicists like Keplero, Laplace, Pascal, ... are missing. It looks like the decided to start with the birth of modern physics (with Galilei) and then to move on, but imho this gives a wrong idea about physics development and history and about the cleverness distribution during times.
I mean you have to start cutting off names somewhere. Would you also include ancient scientists from outside the Mediterranean? I think the video uses a fine list, and yours is also fine
It was only partially his astronomy that got Galileo in trouble with the Catholic Church, the bigger part of the accusations was directed against his erroneous religious views. Besides, another great summary!
Einstein never got a nobel prize for his theories of relativity (special or general) - he was awarded the Nobel Prize for the discovery of the photoelectric effect.
Good video 👏 But why you didn’t mention the oldest physicist, like archimedes or albayroony, also i think Mary curie does not deserve to be from the greatest physicist of all time, should you replace it with Hisenseberg
Paul Dirac was brilliant, wish we had a bunch of geniouses like we had before during the second world war, science and productive R&D peaked during that time and the 1960's.
Planck's approach was to analyze the entropy of blackbody radiation as a function of energy. To make both high-frequency and low-frequency data consistent with the Second Law of Thermodynamics, he included an additional "guess" term proportional to the frequency (hf); this results in Planck's Law. Planck's application of Boltzmann's Statistical Mechanics to justify his guess then led to his revolutionary conclusion that the material of the walls emit and absorb radiation in discrete quanta.
A paper titled "Planck’s Route to the Black Body Radiation Formula and Quantization" by Michael Fowler (7/25/08) gives a nice discussion.
"When we turn our attention to the general case of electrodynamics ... our first impression is surprise at the enormous complexity of the problems to be solved.", Max Planck (1932), quoted at the opening of Chapter 15 "General Electromagnetic Fields" in Andrew Zangwill's "Modern Electrodynamics".
"Electromagnetic Fields and Waves" by Lorrain & Corson (2nd Edition) contains a problem in chapter 2 "Electrostatic Fields in a Vacuum" (2-19) on J.J. Thomson's "Plum Pudding" model of the atom. It asks to (A) find the force on an electron; (B) describe its motion; (C) the frequency for a 1 Angstrom-sized atom; and (D) compare this frequency to that of visible light.
A rather thought-provoking question in an Undergraduate E&M textbook!
If you get into these physics/math and others you just can’t escape because your curiosity that lead to these aren’t letting you escape
feynmann taught himself what it would cost us usually 12 years of education and big sums of money
bruh 💀
Newton invented one of the great branches of Mathematics to explain his theory and also taught himself the Math known to in his days
You have to spend "big sums of money" to learn high-school-level math? There are free textbooks and tons of free videos... It's impressive that Feynman taught himself and at such a young age, but anyone could teach themselves that, just not as fast or at such a young age.
@@HuckleberryHim Exactly. Nothing stops you from lifting a book before it becomes compulsory to do it.
I like how little boilerplate your videos have. They just jump right into the subject at hand.
11:31 Heisenburg looking str8 up demonic in that photo lol
I am not trying to criticize but I feel offended why Sir Nikola Tesla is forgotten in here..
He was not only forgotten during his time for his opposition to Sir Thomas Edison but also today after his great contributions to the world and all of the grid and every electrical appliance is a manifestation of his work on physics. He invented the microphone and started the idea of wireless charging.... Although a huge fan of sir Richard P Feynmann, I feel that Sir Nikola Tesla can displace Sir Richard P Feynmann in this Video...
True, Hawking needed to be included as well. Edward Witten too.
yee u fogor hawking
Exactly.
Leo Szilard?
I hope my name gets in the list one day :)
"Almost everything is already discovered" by von Jolly is wild
yeah
@@ThoughtThrill365You're become one of my favorite TH-cam channel
But actually almost nothing is discovered
The problem with this video is that it completely skips all the "ancient" scientists. It is true that it may be difficult to state if that result was effectively obtained by that scientist, but in any case you cannot exclude from the list Eratosthenes, Anaximander, Archimedes,... Also more modern physicists like Keplero, Laplace, Pascal, ... are missing. It looks like the decided to start with the birth of modern physics (with Galilei) and then to move on, but imho this gives a wrong idea about physics development and history and about the cleverness distribution during times.
Right, and with that being said, where’s Hawking?
I mean you have to start cutting off names somewhere. Would you also include ancient scientists from outside the Mediterranean? I think the video uses a fine list, and yours is also fine
Hope you find this
Watch the previous videos there are some people you mentioned
I like how the video goes straight into it, no prevarication!
11:27 That photo... A pantheon of its time.
It was only partially his astronomy that got Galileo in trouble with the Catholic Church, the bigger part of the accusations was directed against his erroneous religious views. Besides, another great summary!
"The Feynman Lectures on Physics" are still a great read & available on-line.
Richard Feynman was a man of culture. Very based
😂🙈
Einstein never got a nobel prize for his theories of relativity (special or general) - he was awarded the Nobel Prize for the discovery of the photoelectric effect.
Should probably have John von Neumann on this list
It takes all kinds of
Where is gauss
Good video 👏
But why you didn’t mention the oldest physicist, like archimedes or albayroony, also i think Mary curie does not deserve to be from the greatest physicist of all time, should you replace it with Hisenseberg
5:51 Ernest Rutherfordb
No Copernicus? ((
great video!
Paul Dirac was brilliant, wish we had a bunch of geniouses like we had before during the second world war, science and productive R&D peaked during that time and the 1960's.
Great video, but Hawking certainly should have been included.
He’s a nonce
you are amazing at this @ThoughtThrill365