Viking 150 Updates after two years and Performance to 18,000

แชร์
ฝัง
  • เผยแพร่เมื่อ 26 ส.ค. 2024

ความคิดเห็น • 10

  • @MrSweetheartforever
    @MrSweetheartforever ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Awesome thank you! Eye on the Sky!

  • @AnthonyDigi1205
    @AnthonyDigi1205 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Id love to see the 150 in a 750 cruiser and performance numbers

  • @Mike-01234
    @Mike-01234 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    I love how these start up just like a modern car engine does. Look at some of these old carbureted aircraft reminds me of starting an old 1970s, or 80's car. Not that anything is wrong with that I like vintage engines too.

    • @billiondollardan
      @billiondollardan ปีที่แล้ว

      I get what you're saying. I don't want to feel like I'm in a plane with a vintage engine as cool as they may be lol

  • @JasonRidesmoto
    @JasonRidesmoto ปีที่แล้ว

    I'm convinced these engines are great and would love to put one in a Rans S21. Why are these Zenith airplane so popular? They just seem strange to me and not very efficient...

    • @mikhailjairnisbett441
      @mikhailjairnisbett441 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      They are great STOL aircraft and relatively simple to build, so I've seen.

    • @MFMediaProd
      @MFMediaProd ปีที่แล้ว +2

      Lets take performance / price specs with a rotax 912 for example
      S21 (rotax 912)
      useful load 500 lbs LSA
      Wing loading +6 - 2
      850 fpm climb
      38 mph dirty stall
      cruise speed 119 mph
      cockpit width 46 inches
      build time: 700-1000 (per rans website)
      total kit cost + finishing 29,000$
      zenith ch750 (stol)
      useful load 545 lbs LSA
      wing loading + 6 - 3
      1000 fpm lcimb
      35 mph dirty stall
      cruise speed 100mph
      cockpit width 50 inches
      build time 400 hours
      total cost + finishing 35740
      so I'd say fairly efficient for what you get.

    • @Frisher1
      @Frisher1 8 หลายเดือนก่อน

      They are cheap to build, proven reliable and really great slow STOL aircraft, for people that would rather go slow and have better STOL performance than go "fast" (140 knots is pretty fast for a STOL aircraft as you may know) which is what a Rans S21 is, harder to build and more expensive

  • @tpspc03
    @tpspc03 9 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Lol. The scientific method of determining C of G....pushing on the tail. Probably would be more crediable to give the actual numbers.....

    • @eggenfellner
      @eggenfellner  9 หลายเดือนก่อน

      When you have built over a dozen and installed over 50 engine in this exact model you can generally tell if something is off. Not to mention, weight and balance was already done on this aircraft during initial installation.