Simon Saunders | Branch Counting in the Everett interpretation

แชร์
ฝัง
  • เผยแพร่เมื่อ 10 ม.ค. 2025

ความคิดเห็น •

  • @bloodyorphan
    @bloodyorphan 2 ปีที่แล้ว

    I see shades of LHC string theory and I agree that probability does not affect outcome one jot.
    As for the interference dual slot problem, you have to understand how uniform is the virtual photon quantum or EM space distribution within the box.
    In my opinion it is extremely uniform and explains the 0+- to 90+- degree offset photon impact boundaries at the slot implied by the observation.
    Add the fact that a photon is actually a high dilation compressed skin down to the C^3 weight in the BB space you can account for all the Vector and Velocity energies of the interaction very easily. (i.e. the source photon can literally stop in place after the interaction if the collision was exactly 0 or 90 degrees offset resulting in one photon being transmitted straight through or two photons at half speed traveling at 45 degrees.
    Currently my thinking on Skin theory requires a SR space for every particle weight including the photon weight space, it's actually the skin apertures that move, my reasoning is the time dilation required for the visible skin persistence using (C^3/5)^2 also means the particle at the temperature high enough to form said skin will not be "moveable" in our space as velocity red shifts as temperature or weight increases, so the only way a particle can move is if the aperture down to the weight space snaps along a uniform sub structure of BB particles in it's given C^3 weight, as the aperture skin back to zero degrees C, is the only structure of the particle that can have a time dilation approaching our own. (i.e. energy transfers instantaneously when particles kiss)
    Great Talk, thanks :-)

    • @schmetterling4477
      @schmetterling4477 ปีที่แล้ว

      Why are you proving to everybody that you didn't pay attention in school? ;-)

  • @danielm5161
    @danielm5161 3 ปีที่แล้ว

    Great chat