Really well spoken! You can see how knowledgeable and passionate she is about the topic! She seemed almost choked up by the ending quote. I really admire her passion!
Thanks for the great info and speech Angelique..if nothing else people need to focus on what's going on with our planet and not do anymore harm to it. This is just more research that we need to do something..after we only have 1 home..the planet earth..
the charts are very misleading and don't show a baseline of zero for the CO2 nor a baseline of neutral for the PH. Nor do they show anything older than 24 years ago which is a blink in geological time. Since 1988 the alkalinity of the ocean (according to these charts) has dropped from a mean of 8.11 to a mean of 8.07. This isn't "more acidic" but it is "slightly less alkaline", a drop in alkalinity of 0.04 (it cannot be "more acidic" as everything above 7 is alkaline and everything below 7 is acidic, therefore 8.11 is alkaline just as 8.07 is alkaline. To be "more acidic" first it would have to be acidic). The measurement period of 24 years is way too small to make a meaningful prediction of future trends.
Wow, a ocean scientist that makes sense … or at least speaks on a level the average intelligent person can understand, without trying to impress us with research jargon. Plus, she deserves credit for reporting some positives rather than focusing on the typical doom and gloom glorified in the media..
As a human race, we really need to stop interfering with organisms and other life forms. We're inhibiting the ability for evolution to take charge and to adapt to changes in living conditions. We just need to let evolution do what evolution does best, and leave life other than our own to fend for itself. Because over time, it will adapt, and it will be able to thrive, but not if we're stopping its ability to adapt in the first place.
According to the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration, no. However, things could be getting pretty rough in areas around Charleston, SC and Willmington, NC for example. If all the ice on Earth melts, the western half of the Carolina's will remain.
The rate of CO2 increase is not unprecedented. The ice core data shows regular intervals of atmospheric CO2 spikes, which is a lagging indicator of temperature, not a leading indicator.
Josh Shuman The point is, there are natural processes that cause CO2 levels to double very quickly at regular intervals throughout history, which have nothing to do with human emissions. As the sun warms the oceans, more CO2 moves into the atmosphere. There is no experiment that I'm aware of that demonstrates how changing the concentration of a colorless gas by 100 ppm can affect the temperature of a greenhouse, let alone a planet. Even if we assume humans can increase the CO2 level in a meaningful way, I say great. Higher CO2 means faster plant growth and higher oxygen levels. All life on earth depends on that miniscule 400 ppm. Personally, I'd like to see the CO2 level about 25 times higher, just to be on the safe side.
@@DegreesOfThree Interesting theories, Can anyone research this subject online or do you have a degree/qualification. Increase the co2 levels by 25% you say? I wonder if you took your car into a greenhouse, and left it idling, generating co2. Do you think the plants could evolve fast enough to sequestere the co2 before you suffocate?
drzdeano Not by 25%... But by 2500%, which would bring the total CO2 concentration to a measly 1% of the atmosphere. Compare that with Mars which has a CO2 level of 96%. People have no conception how vanishingly small 400 ppm is. CO2 is not dangerous. You're thinking of Carbon Monoxide, which is a completely different thing.
drzdeano And yes, anyone can study this topic and come to their own conclusion, although I do have a biology degree with a focus on botany. Last time I checked, this lady was not a climate scientist, so I'm sure you will apply the same level of skepticism to her as well.
I will go north, I will rise up above the plans and motives of the congregations of the north, I will follow my own plans and work with the vibration of the stars! The vibes and messages the stars give me are my vehicle out of here
The top 1 km of oceans have an approximate mass of 3.6 X 10 to the power 17 tons, All the carbon in the atmosphere is about 3 X 10 to the power 12 tons. If all the CO2 were to dissolve into the oceans, their impact on ocean ph would be undetectable. Perhaps whatever decrease in ocean ph is caused by other factors. Ocean volcanoes?
the ratio of molecular masses between CO2 and H20 is 44 to 20. If carbon in atmosphere is 3X10 to 12th tons, Atmospheric CO2 mass would be 11X10 to 12th. tons. Ratio of H2O molecules in the top 1km of ocean, to CO2 molecules in atmosphere would be : 1.5X 10 to 16th power to 2.5X 10 to the 11th : ie about 60,000 to 1. The volume of the oceans is at least 5 times the top 1km. I am assuming a ratio of less than 1% of H2CO3 already in sea water. Would be glad for actual readings. I must admit, I have not been in college in over 50 years. I am prone to error.
Now, why do you think it is that audiences clap/applaud at the beginning of performances? Because they have already decided that they are going to be "good". No one needs to earn applaud anymore as even mediocrity gets applauded. A qualitative indicator of a species in serious decline.
@@MrSamulai Do you even know how vanishingly small the atmospheric CO2 concentration is? We could increase it by a factor of 20 and it would still be less than 1%. Pollution is a real problem. CO2 is not.
Or look to leading scientific organizations like NASA who have repeatedly stated that to the best of our research, variations in solar activity account for a small fraction (~2%) of global warming that carbon emissions from human activity have caused. "Since 1750, the warming driven by greenhouse gases coming from the human burning of fossil fuels is over 50 times greater than the slight extra warming coming from the Sun itself over that same time interval." [...] "These studies have suggested that while a grand minimum might cool the planet as much as 0.3 degrees C, this would, at best, slow down (but not reverse) human-caused global warming." climate.nasa.gov/blog/2910/what-is-the-suns-role-in-climate-change/
Reid Dickson You mean the same organizations that said we should be terrified of global cooling in the 70s? Just when I perfected my igloo, now they say it's man-made warming we need to watch out for. Sorry, but your experts have zero credibility left. Their forecasts have been consistently wrong and their tone increasingly shrill. The ice core data shows these cycles are a regular and expected occurrence.
@@DegreesOfThree A review of 17 climate models dating between 1970 and 2007 found that 12 of those models predicted the current warming trend with a high level of accuracy. The global cooling predictions were from 7 research papers published between 1965 and 1979 while another 42 papers from that same time predicted a warming trend. That's 6 times as many published papers predicted a warming trend compared to cooling. You're getting bad information.
I will go north, I will rise up above the plans and not fall into the motives of the congregations of the north, I will follow my Christ within, and follow the guidance of the vibration of Orion! The vibes and messages the stars give me are my vehicle out of here! Pacific Stargate..NB,Q, O,M,S,ABC
Sadie Phy you’re thinking of zooplankton perhaps? They utilize chlorophyll and are autotrophs (produce their own food) so it makes sense to refer to algae as a plant probably. I just finished a biology course last semester, but I could be misremembering.
Kinda. As a biologist myself I understand that zooplankton are “animal-like” floating, single cell or colonial eukaryotes (not necessarily autotrophic) and phytoplankton are “plant-like” floating, single cell or colonial autotrophic eukaryotes. But algae all together fall into the immensely diverse kingdom of Protista, not Plant. I see why referring to planktonic protists as plants simplifies things for a general audience, but being a nit picky bio nerd it bothers me a little. Not trying to criticize, just trying to correct.
Lets all blame the 👍🏻 GreatBig USA 🇺🇸. & mean old Trump its all his problem when we are one of the few countries trying too do anything about man made pollution , hows China 🇨🇳 & 🇮🇳 India doing.
The first thing Trump could do would be acknowledging the issue itself. He basically cofounded climate change denial, just a reminder. Meanwhile china is investing in pv, wind energy and electric mobility. Maybe visit shensen to see the scale and dimension of progress for yourself. Ofc China still has a long way to go (as every country has). But if you are actually supporting environmentalism and the fight against climate change then you shouldnt defend Trump and go for the old and cheap whataboutism with china and india. Please dont feel personally attacked. It is just a continuity error that im hearing a lot recently.
Now, why do you think it is that audiences clap/applaud at the beginning of performances? Because they have already decided that they are going to be "good". No one needs to earn applaud anymore as even mediocrity gets applauded. A qualitative indicator of a species in serious decline.
@@MrAndrew535 I don't know how you do things where you're from, but it is proper etiquette to greet someone politely when meeting them. This is how an audience greets a speaker. She did earn an applause in the end. It's also a polite way to thank someone for speaking. You must only talk to your self since you're apparently better than middle-class people. All this over people clapping for someone? you must be a bitter know-it-all rich guy. Hilarious!
@@ThriftyTsShop Indeed I am better than the middle class for the very reasons I indicated and more. Nothing is validated simply because people do it, regardless of number. Clapping is a hideous convention which, among other factors has the effect of infantilizing a society, as does the very notion of class itself. "It is normal" is no defence either" as this ludicrously obscene behaviur is passed on, and I would effectively argue, thrust upon generations who possess no facilities to defend themselves against it. Politeness has no place in a truly civilized society. As for etiquette, historically, that was more a question of internal discipline and not a function of massaging the egos of the mediocre. Like I previously stated, society is in serious decline and I have seen nothing in your response that would affect my evaluation. I am no spring chicken and I "know the score and have encountered many with the exact same facile views you have just evacuated, and from an orifice most inappropriate. I do hope you wiped afterwards.
we humans are one part of the cause , but I think there is something else also causing this changes , maybe as the galaxy spins and we change locations , or maybe as the earth orbit the sun , or the earth tilted more than it should I dont know , all I know something is not right
Usually scientists are not that good on communicating but White is a ⭐
👏👏👏👏👏👏👏👏👏👏👏👏 ✔
Really well spoken! You can see how knowledgeable and passionate she is about the topic! She seemed almost choked up by the ending quote. I really admire her passion!
The end quote hit home!
Thank you for your clear explanations and your hard work. This kind of knowledge is crucial in our time.
plz give the subtitles
Thanks for the great info and speech Angelique..if nothing else people need to focus on what's going on with our planet and not do anymore harm to it. This is just more research that we need to do something..after we only have 1 home..the planet earth..
the charts are very misleading and don't show a baseline of zero for the CO2 nor a baseline of neutral for the PH. Nor do they show anything older than 24 years ago which is a blink in geological time. Since 1988 the alkalinity of the ocean (according to these charts) has dropped from a mean of 8.11 to a mean of 8.07. This isn't "more acidic" but it is "slightly less alkaline", a drop in alkalinity of 0.04 (it cannot be "more acidic" as everything above 7 is alkaline and everything below 7 is acidic, therefore 8.11 is alkaline just as 8.07 is alkaline. To be "more acidic" first it would have to be acidic). The measurement period of 24 years is way too small to make a meaningful prediction of future trends.
This tha good and very knowledgeable
Wow, a ocean scientist that makes sense … or at least speaks on a level the average intelligent person can understand, without trying to impress us with research jargon. Plus, she deserves credit for reporting some positives rather than focusing on the typical doom and gloom glorified in the media..
Your Video is Politically Correct!
As a human race, we really need to stop interfering with organisms and other life forms. We're inhibiting the ability for evolution to take charge and to adapt to changes in living conditions. We just need to let evolution do what evolution does best, and leave life other than our own to fend for itself. Because over time, it will adapt, and it will be able to thrive, but not if we're stopping its ability to adapt in the first place.
Yes, our coast is beautiful, but deadly.
Got it, we don't want change because we want our clams to be beneficial to us when we eat them.
Very shellfish.
LMAO
Many a times facts are needed to convince our logical beings. Destruction is obvious but ignoring that builds the ignorance.
Question: Will the Carolinas will be under water in the next 10- 15 years?
According to the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration, no. However, things could be getting pretty rough in areas around Charleston, SC and Willmington, NC for example. If all the ice on Earth melts, the western half of the Carolina's will remain.
With all coastal US cities right behind, not including entire countries like Shri Lanka and The Netherlands.
The rate of CO2 increase is not unprecedented. The ice core data shows regular intervals of atmospheric CO2 spikes, which is a lagging indicator of temperature, not a leading indicator.
It's not? I thought the CO2 cycles you are referring to over the past 800K years have fluctuated between 170 and 300 PPM. We're now at 400+ PPM...
Josh Shuman The point is, there are natural processes that cause CO2 levels to double very quickly at regular intervals throughout history, which have nothing to do with human emissions. As the sun warms the oceans, more CO2 moves into the atmosphere. There is no experiment that I'm aware of that demonstrates how changing the concentration of a colorless gas by 100 ppm can affect the temperature of a greenhouse, let alone a planet. Even if we assume humans can increase the CO2 level in a meaningful way, I say great. Higher CO2 means faster plant growth and higher oxygen levels. All life on earth depends on that miniscule 400 ppm. Personally, I'd like to see the CO2 level about 25 times higher, just to be on the safe side.
@@DegreesOfThree
Interesting theories, Can anyone research this subject online or do you have a degree/qualification.
Increase the co2 levels by 25% you say? I wonder if you took your car into a greenhouse, and left it idling, generating co2. Do you think the plants could evolve fast enough to sequestere the co2 before you suffocate?
drzdeano Not by 25%... But by 2500%, which would bring the total CO2 concentration to a measly 1% of the atmosphere. Compare that with Mars which has a CO2 level of 96%. People have no conception how vanishingly small 400 ppm is. CO2 is not dangerous. You're thinking of Carbon Monoxide, which is a completely different thing.
drzdeano And yes, anyone can study this topic and come to their own conclusion, although I do have a biology degree with a focus on botany. Last time I checked, this lady was not a climate scientist, so I'm sure you will apply the same level of skepticism to her as well.
Sant ana wind!
*Quote of the day*
Never give up on what you really want to do. The person with big dreams is more powerful than the one with all facts
I will go north, I will rise up above the plans and motives of the congregations of the north, I will follow my own plans and work with the vibration of the stars! The vibes and messages the stars give me are my vehicle out of here
The top 1 km of oceans have an approximate mass of 3.6 X 10 to the power 17 tons, All the carbon in the atmosphere is about 3 X 10 to the power 12 tons. If all the CO2 were to dissolve into the oceans, their impact on ocean ph would be undetectable. Perhaps whatever decrease in ocean ph is caused by other factors. Ocean volcanoes?
the ratio of molecular masses between CO2 and H20 is 44 to 20.
If carbon in atmosphere is 3X10 to 12th tons, Atmospheric CO2 mass would be 11X10 to 12th. tons.
Ratio of H2O molecules in the top 1km of ocean, to CO2 molecules in atmosphere would be : 1.5X 10 to 16th power to 2.5X 10 to the 11th : ie about 60,000 to 1. The volume of the oceans is at least 5 times the top 1km.
I am assuming a ratio of less than 1% of H2CO3 already in sea water. Would be glad for actual readings.
I must admit, I have not been in college in over 50 years. I am prone to error.
I m confuse that I choose Biology , or English for University studies 😑✌
Choose Biology!
@@halcyon1009 Yeah dear ! But here is some problem in Biology there is no vast field of jobs etc
Doom and gloom. I think I have heard this before.
Like me for nothing😬
Now, why do you think it is that audiences clap/applaud at the beginning of performances? Because they have already decided that they are going to be "good". No one needs to earn applaud anymore as even mediocrity gets applauded. A qualitative indicator of a species in serious decline.
Is actually like you for something.
I am not refuting the speech, just saying this is the wrong audience. Someone needs to say this in China and in India.
Eli Nope The Chinese and Indians are a little busy pulling 2 billion people out of poverty to give a damn about phytoplankton.
The USA elected a climate science denier for president so uhh
@@DeoMachina Because feelings matter more than the actual people and nations doing the polluting. Okay doomer.
MrSamulai Except turning off that stove means hundreds of millions of people don't get to have cars, air conditioning, or basic appliances.
@@MrSamulai Do you even know how vanishingly small the atmospheric CO2 concentration is? We could increase it by a factor of 20 and it would still be less than 1%. Pollution is a real problem. CO2 is not.
Sucks
😍😍
4th
#govegan
scary and sad..
Don't be a sheep. Question everything, especially "authority" figures.
Wake up girl
Have you included the effects of our Sun's cycles on our ecosystems? No? See SpaceWeatherNews and suspiciousobservers on youtube! 💖😎
Or look to leading scientific organizations like NASA who have repeatedly stated that to the best of our research, variations in solar activity account for a small fraction (~2%) of global warming that carbon emissions from human activity have caused.
"Since 1750, the warming driven by greenhouse gases coming from the human burning of fossil fuels is over 50 times greater than the slight extra warming coming from the Sun itself over that same time interval." [...] "These studies have suggested that while a grand minimum might cool the planet as much as 0.3 degrees C, this would, at best, slow down (but not reverse) human-caused global warming."
climate.nasa.gov/blog/2910/what-is-the-suns-role-in-climate-change/
Reid Dickson You mean the same organizations that said we should be terrified of global cooling in the 70s? Just when I perfected my igloo, now they say it's man-made warming we need to watch out for. Sorry, but your experts have zero credibility left. Their forecasts have been consistently wrong and their tone increasingly shrill. The ice core data shows these cycles are a regular and expected occurrence.
@@DegreesOfThree A review of 17 climate models dating between 1970 and 2007 found that 12 of those models predicted the current warming trend with a high level of accuracy. The global cooling predictions were from 7 research papers published between 1965 and 1979 while another 42 papers from that same time predicted a warming trend. That's 6 times as many published papers predicted a warming trend compared to cooling. You're getting bad information.
I will go north, I will rise up above the plans and not fall into the motives of the congregations of the north, I will follow my Christ within, and follow the guidance of the vibration of Orion! The vibes and messages the stars give me are my vehicle out of here! Pacific Stargate..NB,Q, O,M,S,ABC
First view
I really appreciate this lecture and advocation but phytoplankton aren’t plants...
Sadie Phy you’re thinking of zooplankton perhaps? They utilize chlorophyll and are autotrophs (produce their own food) so it makes sense to refer to algae as a plant probably. I just finished a biology course last semester, but I could be misremembering.
Kinda. As a biologist myself I understand that zooplankton are “animal-like” floating, single cell or colonial eukaryotes (not necessarily autotrophic) and phytoplankton are “plant-like” floating, single cell or colonial autotrophic eukaryotes. But algae all together fall into the immensely diverse kingdom of Protista, not Plant. I see why referring to planktonic protists as plants simplifies things for a general audience, but being a nit picky bio nerd it bothers me a little. Not trying to criticize, just trying to correct.
First
And she went politic... Can you vote for Chinese government to care about climate? I don’t think so, unless you live there.
Lets all blame the 👍🏻 GreatBig USA 🇺🇸. & mean old Trump its all his problem when we are one of the few countries trying too do anything about man made pollution , hows China 🇨🇳 & 🇮🇳 India doing.
The first thing Trump could do would be acknowledging the issue itself. He basically cofounded climate change denial, just a reminder. Meanwhile china is investing in pv, wind energy and electric mobility. Maybe visit shensen to see the scale and dimension of progress for yourself. Ofc China still has a long way to go (as every country has). But if you are actually supporting environmentalism and the fight against climate change then you shouldnt defend Trump and go for the old and cheap whataboutism with china and india. Please dont feel personally attacked. It is just a continuity error that im hearing a lot recently.
a lot of maybes and night's in her science
stu S as all good scientist should say. There is no such thing as certainty, just likelihood’s.
Now, why do you think it is that audiences clap/applaud at the beginning of performances? Because they have already decided that they are going to be "good". No one needs to earn applaud anymore as even mediocrity gets applauded. A qualitative indicator of a species in serious decline.
@@MrAndrew535 You could have just put "someone argue with me" lol
Andew Tarjanyi you must think you’re cool
They were applauding her arrival to speak and greeting her, Lets see you do a public speech on how our you think the species is declining. lol
@@MrAndrew535 I don't know how you do things where you're from, but it is proper etiquette to greet someone politely when meeting them. This is how an audience greets a speaker. She did earn an applause in the end. It's also a polite way to thank someone for speaking. You must only talk to your self since you're apparently better than middle-class people. All this over people clapping for someone? you must be a bitter know-it-all rich guy. Hilarious!
@@ThriftyTsShop Indeed I am better than the middle class for the very reasons I indicated and more. Nothing is validated simply because people do it, regardless of number. Clapping is a hideous convention which, among other factors has the effect of infantilizing a society, as does the very notion of class itself. "It is normal" is no defence either" as this ludicrously obscene behaviur is passed on, and I would effectively argue, thrust upon generations who possess no facilities to defend themselves against it.
Politeness has no place in a truly civilized society. As for etiquette, historically, that was more a question of internal discipline and not a function of massaging the egos of the mediocre. Like I previously stated, society is in serious decline and I have seen nothing in your response that would affect my evaluation. I am no spring chicken and I "know the score and have encountered many with the exact same facile views you have just evacuated, and from an orifice most inappropriate. I do hope you wiped afterwards.
we humans are one part of the cause , but I think there is something else also causing this changes , maybe as the galaxy spins and we change locations , or maybe as the earth orbit the sun , or the earth tilted more than it should I dont know , all I know something is not right
No matter what we do, climate will never stop changing. But We do not need to deliberately accelerate the speed.