How To Get A Perfect 36 On ACT English - 2 Must-Know Strategies From A Perfect Scorer
ฝัง
- เผยแพร่เมื่อ 17 ส.ค. 2024
- The ACT English section is the EASIEST section to score a perfect 36 and drastically improve your score 5, 8, even 10 points! 94% of my students score 30 and above on the ACT English Test, and in this video I will share my expert advice, tips, strategies, and secrets so that you can too!
To crush the ACT English Test in 2024, there are 2 keys: (1) learn ALL the grammar rules tested on the ACT and (2) learn the best strategies and pattern-spotting techniques to make ACT English feel easy on test day. I truly believe that almost anyone can score 30 and above on the ACT English Test. I have coached over 150 students to scores of 34-36 on ACT English, so I know exactly what it takes to achieve top scores.
To learn some of the most commonly tested grammar rules and start your journey to an AMAZING ACT English score, sign up for the FREE TRIAL to my Ultimate ACT Course here: www.preppros.i....
If you really want that perfect 36 or to improve your ACT score as much as possible, the Ultimate ACT course is the best online ACT Course anywhere. The course includes all the same materials, lessons, and content that I teach in private tutoring session for $250/hr, all for only $99/month. It's by far the best deal in test prep!! The English Course includes my ACT English Book and all of the grammar rules and pattern-spotting skills that you need to know for your best score ever. There are also courses for Math, Reading, Science, and full practice ACTs. Sign up here: www.preppros.i....
Feel free to ask any questions you have in the comments below. You can also reach out to me directly at matt@preppros.io. I would love to hear from you and would be happy to help you get your dream ACT scores!
Don't forget to like and subscribe! New ACT videos each week.
![[Official Music Video] ฝังใจ - BOW Maylada [Prod. By Tan LIPTA]](http://i.ytimg.com/vi/rSjk1jKWRN4/mqdefault.jpg)
Improve your ACT score by 3 points, GUARANTEED! My Ultimate ACT Course has 70+ hours of videos where I teach you everything you need to know to crush the ACT. Learn some of the most commonly tested grammar rules in the FREE Trial (no credit card needed): www.preppros.io/act-course.
this got me from 25 to 35 on this section
fr
Me who got the ultimate act guide. It really help got my English score from a 21 to a 26 and its still climbing.
So glad to hear that you are enjoying the Ultimate ACT Course and have seen so much improvement so far!
@@preppros oh yea, my English is from a 21 to a 26 and it's still going up with practice(yet that act scammed me, because I got 11 wrong for a 26 which is like a 33 on a different test) and my math went from a 27 to a 31.
@@walter-yt8mu That's awesome. Keep up the good work! I'd really appreciate if you could leave a review for my ACT Math Book on Amazon...the book is new so great reviews will really help more students know about it.
@@preppros I've really never used the book but I heard it was good. My score went up from all the TH-cam videos you posted and all the help you did with my on reddit. But I can still leave a review because you deserve it.
Used only the free course, and on the last ACT I was able to improve my english from 21 to a 25. I plan on getting the paid package for the act in september to improve my scores even more. Thanks!
I got a 11 on the English ACT the first time on Mar 27 of this year since I’m a junior but hope to score better this October when I’m a senior
lock in bro😭😭😭
@@cohen6642BROS COOKED
@@cohen6642 ong bra 11 is insane
11 is crazy i got a 21 as a freshamn
@@Nolifemelon I got like 25 as a freshman (but that was pre act)
So if you added "the" it would make it specific enough to be the festival organizer "Dottie Thompson"
Can you post those section overviews on each section? Those really helped!
by that I mean can you do a full test and go over each question?
@@user-ur6yd2xm6i I would love to but the ACT forced me to take down all my practice ACT test explanations due to copyright issues. The ACT doesn't allow us to record explanations with their tests. I'm going to write my own test(s) and post them on TH-cam. The math test is already done and available on TH-cam! I'll do an English section next once I have some time to get it written and filmed.
@@prepprosis the test that you will make be free?
@@walter-yt8mu Yes, it will be free.
@@preppros That is perfect, I know you can't do it all but I really wanna see you go over it before the September 9th ACT, that is my last one I can take. Thank you
Hello! I love watching your videos since I am preparing for the ACT in September. Now a question occured in my most recent english test, and I can't find my mistake. Maybe someone could help?
Yet until 1903, few visitors could gain access to the trees in the *park: there was* was no completed road.
A: No change
B: park: because there was
D: park; because there was
E: park;
I thought we have two independet clauses "Few visitors could gain access to the trees in the park" and "there was no completed road" and I could therefor go with E. But in the anwsers it says there is a phrase and I should go with A? Can someone please explain? Thank you so much!
how do you distinguish if something is common or not common tho for the name rule
It all depends on if the identifier (the thing before the name) is specific to 1 person or not. As I said in the video, an identifier like "friend" is not specific since we do not know which friend is being referring to, so the name is necessary and there are no commas.
If the identifier is something like "best friend" or "youngest sister," the identifier is specific to 1 person and then the name is unnecessary information and can be removed with commas.
started at a 40/75, currently average about 66-69/75 of questions. I tend to get a lot of questions wrong in the last or last 2 passages. Are the passages in difficulty order?
No, there is no order of difficulty on the ACT English Test. If you are missing more questions later on your practice tests, the issues is likely losing focus or time management (if you are rushing to finish).
Great videos. But at 1:45, how can you say that is not specific to one person? It is true that there may be multiple organizers, but the way the sentence is written, one could reasonably assume that she is the only one. Perhaps I am not quite understanding what "specific" means in this case.
By definition, one can only have one best friend. Perhaps it is because the title, "festival organizer," itself does not convey a feeling of uniqueness?
What if, though, the writer of this article knew that Dottie Thompson was the only festival organizer? Would that have any effect on how the sentence should be written?
And what about a sentence that describes a CEO? Generally, that title belongs to one person.
Tomorrow, the CEO, Bill Smith, will be at the meeting.
Tomorrow, the CEO Bill Smith will be at the meeting.
I just looked it up, though, and it is possible for a single company to have multiple CEOs. In that case, which of the above sentences would be correct?
Good question. For this question, since "festival organizer" is not specific to one person (there are a bunch of festival organizers in general and could be more than 1 for this event as well), there are no commas. Even if the author knows that there is only 1 organizer, there are still no commas because the reader does not know who is being referred to.
The CEO example also would have no commas assuming this is the first time we are given the name Bill Smith. "the CEO" is not specific to 1 person (there are a bunch of CEOs). If we had already introduce Bill Smith as the CEO, so the readers knows who the CEO is, then you can have commas.
If it was instead like "The CEO of Apple," that is specific to 1 person, so then there would be commas.
Again, they generally do not include borderline examples like the CEO one that you made up on the ACT. The names rule questions on the ACT are quite clear as long as you know the rule.
1:33 What if the friend was already identified?
I have a friend who lives next door. We have been friends for years. My friend, John Smith, is coming to my house for dinner on Saturday.
If the friend is identified in a way that makes it clear exactly who is being referred to, the name is unnecessary and can be placed in commas. In your example, I still think it needs commas since you could have multiple friends who live next door, but it's borderline (so it won't be like this on the ACT).
If instead you example was like the one below, then it would need commas for sure.
I have a friend who lives next door. We have been friends for years. That friend, John Smith, is coming to my house for dinner on Saturday.
i knew the first one bc of nri
Is the 10 McGraw act practice tests worth to take even though it’s from 6-7 years ago, and if not do you know any good act practice tests sites
No, I wouldn't use those. It's best to use practice ACTs written by the ACT. There is a website crackab.com/act that has some old ones. You can also buy the ACT Prep book (it's a big red book) that has practice ACTs as well that you can use.
@@preppros I already did the crack ab ones, is there any free act practice test besides the ones act gives out each
@@nayeemahmadxt7043 The ACT releases 3 tests each year in April, June, and December. I’m not sure how many that website has up. The ACT has been cracking down on the tests being available online (copyright issues) so it’s harder to find them now online.
@@preppros thank u
Nah I can't take this serious u look and sound similar to Andrew Tate 💀