I commend Shweta Narayan and the individuals she highlighted in her talk for their efforts in providing healthcare and education to those who are truly at a disadvantage because of decisions made outside of their control. As proposed in this talk, I believe, by making health at the heart of climate change we will reach more people and will have a greater impact on the opinion people have on climate change. By showing real impacts of climate change and pollution, we will create more interest and more drive to make changes and do better for our health while making a difference for the environment and health of the planet as well. I don’t think many people are aware of the impacts of natural disasters, like floods, on healthcare systems especially in low income and marginalized communities. Loss of power, unsafe working conditions, and having to destroy medications and other supplies due to contamination or improper storage. I recently read a statistic that if global health care was its own country, it would be the 5th largest contributor to carbon emissions in the world. So just as Shweta Narayan said, this problem is a double edged sword. I would personally love to see move push and more action being taken in the USA as we are one of the most wealthy countries and still really not doing our part to decrease our emissions. Medical professionals, like doctors and nurses, are viewed as some of the most trusted professionals, and if we can motivate these individuals to advocate for these types of changes in their own hospitals and beyond, there is so much potential for change. Health should not be determined by a person’s wealth. I absolutely love the points made by Narayan about the principles of “do no harm” in all decisions. We have recently seen this come to the forefront with the train derailment in Ohio, political decisions and actions made about gun control, LGBTQ+ rights, and many other topics. Climate justice is justice for all.
Excellent Madam, Indeed we should think of # Air pollution to control and overcome the challenges and put our efforts not only for wealth and for protection of the climate.
"Bad, wrongful, harmful and unjust behaviour needs to stop". What a surprising and profound insight. I always thought Bad, wrongful, harmful and unjust behaviour needed to continue. (Sarcasm) But seriously, this talk took the almost tautological "good things are good, bad things are bad", and tried to make it sound like a novel insight. The tricky questions are ones with a tradeoff. You have a fresh human heart, and a transplant patient across the country. You can charter a private jet to get it their now. Or put it on already flying passenger planes, and it will arrive a bit slower. You have a chart showing the heart has a 10% chance of rejection if fresh, and a 30% chance if less fresh. They don't say how to trade good healthcare vs pollution. They don't say how to trade off people not having electricity vs pollution.
Appreciate as it's high time n most needed thing of an hour .It is destructing draining earth's natural resources along with living beings in the name of development,economy n progress but ultimately creating only wastage of resources n leading to misuse n wastages of material things as which r easily available at cheaper price sadly on the cost of mother earth. I seek blessings 🙏 to fulfill your noble aim
what he says is very good, but caring for the environment and also for health is something that should be given as a subject in primary and secondary schools, that is the problem, today in schools people are programmed to that they are employees of these polluting companies, the fight against them is
Thank you for her sharing. But i wonder, climate change affects our health, and first, "do no harm". Is it practical ? I don't know but we talk about enviroment problem a lot, but I don't see any project or method practical and effectively .......
The "first do no harm" doctrine was used to stop human challenge trials, and to recall vaccines with tiny risks of blood clots. (Blood clot risk far far smaller than covid risk) "First do no harm" privileges doing nothing. Pick the action that overall leads to the most good. Sometimes avoiding any chance of doing any harm just means a greater harm of inaction.
the premise is all wrong. Just simply existing makes you unhealthy. Unhealthy is something that we have to accept but it doesnt mean that things cant be less unhealthy
Is that...an Apple watch on her wrist?! Produced with 0% pollution and with no child/slave labor at all, no doubt. And did she...fly...to this event? 🙄😒
And is she healthy (inner and outer)? Not saying she is not but not sure about preaching about what should others do instead of applying it by herself… TED talks are now just “What some people say all SHOULD do”
Ahaha ! And there it is... Another person thinking that someone needs to be perfect to advocate for something. There it is. The broken mentality that keeps people in their complaisance.
To meet the worldwide demand of energy without hurting Mother Earth, we need these kinds of energy: wind, solar, hydro, geothermal, tidal, and biomass. But for the next 1000 years we also need nuclear fusion. Someday, however, we will need to get energy from tiny black holes. 💕 ☮ 🌎 🌌
This whole speech is based on the premise that the planet is actually “sick”. It is not. Life expectancy globally has skyrocketed, largely due to an abundance of inexpensive and reliable fossil fuel energy. The exact same can be said for our resilience to at responding to natural disasters, largely due to the wealth and response capability fueled by hydrocarbons. The death rate from natural disasters just 1-200 years ago was astronomically higher than it is today and that is the result of fossil fuels and the technologies which they fuel or helped create. This misanthropic cliche that humans are poisoning the earth for profits and greed and that we already have obvious and effective solutions that said greed is preventing, is just naive simplistic. You can see it in her appeals to solar panels as this panacea and the delusional belief that on the back of “green” or “renewable “ energy, we will reach 100% zero omissions. We will not and the failure to grasp that and the complexities of energy production as well as the failure to realize that all of this stuff requires making painful trade offs will only cause more damage and suffering in the misallocation of trillions of dollars of “green “ projects that are doomed to fail.
Please atleast leave healthcare from climate change improvement. People need to live first in order to enjoy climate. Start with other factors like industry ,pollution etc. Healthcare must be priority over climate change.
The time has come for us to measure the advancement of our civilisation through the metric of health rather than the metric of wealth. Yes indeed
I commend Shweta Narayan and the individuals she highlighted in her talk for their efforts in providing healthcare and education to those who are truly at a disadvantage because of decisions made outside of their control. As proposed in this talk, I believe, by making health at the heart of climate change we will reach more people and will have a greater impact on the opinion people have on climate change. By showing real impacts of climate change and pollution, we will create more interest and more drive to make changes and do better for our health while making a difference for the environment and health of the planet as well. I don’t think many people are aware of the impacts of natural disasters, like floods, on healthcare systems especially in low income and marginalized communities. Loss of power, unsafe working conditions, and having to destroy medications and other supplies due to contamination or improper storage. I recently read a statistic that if global health care was its own country, it would be the 5th largest contributor to carbon emissions in the world. So just as Shweta Narayan said, this problem is a double edged sword. I would personally love to see move push and more action being taken in the USA as we are one of the most wealthy countries and still really not doing our part to decrease our emissions. Medical professionals, like doctors and nurses, are viewed as some of the most trusted professionals, and if we can motivate these individuals to advocate for these types of changes in their own hospitals and beyond, there is so much potential for change. Health should not be determined by a person’s wealth. I absolutely love the points made by Narayan about the principles of “do no harm” in all decisions. We have recently seen this come to the forefront with the train derailment in Ohio, political decisions and actions made about gun control, LGBTQ+ rights, and many other topics. Climate justice is justice for all.
very good speeches, its really inspiring me, thank you so much
Yes, the fact that people really believe being fat is healthy; Makes it difficult to have a healthy world when you're being gaslit.
This is a good speech and got me lot of information
Excellent Madam, Indeed we should think of # Air pollution to control and overcome the challenges and put our efforts not only for wealth and for protection of the climate.
Yeah you are right. People should think about do no harm before buying goods and services from businesses.
"Bad, wrongful, harmful and unjust behaviour needs to stop". What a surprising and profound insight. I always thought Bad, wrongful, harmful and unjust behaviour needed to continue. (Sarcasm)
But seriously, this talk took the almost tautological "good things are good, bad things are bad", and tried to make it sound like a novel insight.
The tricky questions are ones with a tradeoff. You have a fresh human heart, and a transplant patient across the country. You can charter a private jet to get it their now. Or put it on already flying passenger planes, and it will arrive a bit slower. You have a chart showing the heart has a 10% chance of rejection if fresh, and a 30% chance if less fresh. They don't say how to trade good healthcare vs pollution. They don't say how to trade off people not having electricity vs pollution.
TED Countdown is so good 🥺🥀
Appreciate as it's high time n most needed thing of an hour .It is destructing draining earth's natural resources along with living beings in the name of development,economy n progress but ultimately creating only wastage of resources n leading to misuse n wastages of material things as which r easily available at cheaper price sadly on the cost of mother earth.
I seek blessings 🙏 to fulfill your noble aim
Not remotely true, although the proportion of healthy people will likely be smaller than in a healthier biosphere.
The United States military are exempt from all EPA regulations. But those factories in China that make our iPhones are as well.
what he says is very good, but caring for the environment and also for health is something that should be given as a subject in primary and secondary schools, that is the problem, today in schools people are programmed to that they are employees of these polluting companies, the fight against them is
🤘
เห็นด้วย
Great job I salute you here watching from Philippines
Less people in the 🌎 is the solution as well
Ok Thanos
Thank you for her sharing. But i wonder, climate change affects our health, and first, "do no harm". Is it practical ? I don't know but we talk about enviroment problem a lot, but I don't see any project or method practical and effectively .......
The "first do no harm" doctrine was used to stop human challenge trials, and to recall vaccines with tiny risks of blood clots. (Blood clot risk far far smaller than covid risk)
"First do no harm" privileges doing nothing.
Pick the action that overall leads to the most good. Sometimes avoiding any chance of doing any harm just means a greater harm of inaction.
💘
Let’s see..how
That's true
the premise is all wrong. Just simply existing makes you unhealthy. Unhealthy is something that we have to accept but it doesnt mean that things cant be less unhealthy
WE UNDERSTAND W.H.O. SUPPORTS FLYING IF WE HOLD OUR BREATH OR STICK OUR HEAD OUT THE WINDOW OF THE PLANE.
WHICH IS SAFER?❤️🙏
Is that...an Apple watch on her wrist?! Produced with 0% pollution and with no child/slave labor at all, no doubt. And did she...fly...to this event? 🙄😒
And is she healthy (inner and outer)? Not saying she is not but not sure about preaching about what should others do instead of applying it by herself… TED talks are now just “What some people say all SHOULD do”
Ahaha ! And there it is... Another person thinking that someone needs to be perfect to advocate for something. There it is. The broken mentality that keeps people in their complaisance.
👌👌🙏🙏
오늘도 영상 👀잘보고 갈께요~
Air pollution and industrial water pollution are known worldwide problems. (Climate change is debatable according to some corporations.)
Problem is we turn a blind eye to pollution, even if it is highly visible.
To meet the worldwide demand of energy without hurting Mother Earth, we need these kinds of energy: wind, solar, hydro, geothermal, tidal, and biomass. But for the next 1000 years we also need nuclear fusion. Someday, however, we will need to get energy from tiny black holes. 💕 ☮ 🌎 🌌
A planet cannot get sick
It can die
Hello
"We've Been Trying To Reach You About Your Car's Extended Warranty"
This whole speech is based on the premise that the planet is actually “sick”. It is not. Life expectancy globally has skyrocketed, largely due to an abundance of inexpensive and reliable fossil fuel energy. The exact same can be said for our resilience to at responding to natural disasters, largely due to the wealth and response capability fueled by hydrocarbons. The death rate from natural disasters just 1-200 years ago was astronomically higher than it is today and that is the result of fossil fuels and the technologies which they fuel or helped create. This misanthropic cliche that humans are poisoning the earth for profits and greed and that we already have obvious and effective solutions that said greed is preventing, is just naive simplistic. You can see it in her appeals to solar panels as this panacea and the delusional belief that on the back of “green” or “renewable “ energy, we will reach 100% zero omissions. We will not and the failure to grasp that and the complexities of energy production as well as the failure to realize that all of this stuff requires making painful trade offs will only cause more damage and suffering in the misallocation of trillions of dollars of “green “ projects that are doomed to fail.
Maybe not but a planet can die.
What a small brained take.
🖖🏽🙏🏽🖤
言いたい事は理解したわ、先生
まず【私自身を治してそれから頑張れ】って事でしょう？
だが、私は今の方法以外に自分を治す方法など知らぬ( ･̀ω･́ )ｷﾘｯ
…先生だけだからよ？
やっと信頼する医師に出会えたと思ったのだもの
でも…(ryもう説明しません
眠剤と安定剤ありがとう
お陰で頭痛がなくなりました😊💕
Please atleast leave healthcare from climate change improvement.
People need to live first in order to enjoy climate.
Start with other factors like industry ,pollution etc.
Healthcare must be priority over climate change.
😇
Maybe the planet has too many mouths to feed, and that's also the problem.
Money monry money
This îs their way of eradicating the Poor
Modern india ..... lol
People still watch these talks? 😆
16th comment
“Congrats to everyone who is early and who found this comment”🏆
such an achievement
All this being first or early is ridiculous 🙄
@@vesawuoristo4162 It's all they have.. haha
👍👍👍