Art talks about the core developers not being able to change the code as a bad thing. I find that the problem with all these projects are the core developers, foundations, organizations, companies, overseer's. The only way BTC is changed is if the "miners" choose to implement your change.
@@DouglasHeyen The entity showed us the amount of centralization in these projects. They all very quickly changed the code to make them ASIC resistant. This ability only comes from being centralized.
0 confs will exchanges and other users/platforms accept at that stage is the question. I’d suspect it’ll still take 2-3 confirmations before an exchange even considers it valid. So if the chain is overloaded there will be all these transactions in mempool and no way to boost with rbf. It’ll be a mess when this gets traction.
CEX's won't use 0-confs, it would make no sense for them to do so. Radiant is built to scale, with a large and increasing block size, so the chain won't get overloaded. Already Radiant has achieved more tx's per day than Kaspa.
If you dont like whats happening, make your own chain. This guy-2024 Talks about community now... Forgive me for giving his words no weight whatsoever Appreciate you Minesum10 🙂
Right!?!?! So glad I dumped this trash project.. The disrespect to gpu miners and little jabs taken via social media was crazy. Nothing to brag about sucking off the entity and selling dog shit asics that will never roi what a joke.
Thanks for your time MineSum10 🤝
Likewise sir
The future Radiant💥
Great stuff guys!
In Radiant, we trust ❤❤❤
Radiant has grassroots. Art has done an impressive job guiding the community over the past few years. RXD will continue to impress.
15:30
Thanks Art and Minesum10! Great interview, solid real convo. The future is Radiant!
The future is indeed Radiant💥
Let’s gooooooo
Art talks about the core developers not being able to change the code as a bad thing. I find that the problem with all these projects are the core developers, foundations, organizations, companies, overseer's. The only way BTC is changed is if the "miners" choose to implement your change.
Thank you. My sentiment exactly.
@@DouglasHeyen The entity showed us the amount of centralization in these projects. They all very quickly changed the code to make them ASIC resistant. This ability only comes from being centralized.
decentralization means the protocol stays put
Lomg live radiant.
what is the purpose and goal of radiant?
Socialism for the devs and miner manufacturers. all projects that came after Bitcoin seem to have this “issue”. No gains after payday
Scale BTC. Digital sovereignty.
Dang, I have no question.
The coin has only gone down and now DragonBall is manipulating the price till there miners sell out. Which will still just be another lower high
Hi
0 confs will exchanges and other users/platforms accept at that stage is the question. I’d suspect it’ll still take 2-3 confirmations before an exchange even considers it valid. So if the chain is overloaded there will be all these transactions in mempool and no way to boost with rbf. It’ll be a mess when this gets traction.
CEX's won't use 0-confs, it would make no sense for them to do so. Radiant is built to scale, with a large and increasing block size, so the chain won't get overloaded. Already Radiant has achieved more tx's per day than Kaspa.
If you dont like whats happening, make your own chain. This guy-2024
Talks about community now...
Forgive me for giving his words no weight whatsoever
Appreciate you Minesum10 🙂
Right!?!?! So glad I dumped this trash project.. The disrespect to gpu miners and little jabs taken via social media was crazy. Nothing to brag about sucking off the entity and selling dog shit asics that will never roi what a joke.