The Philosophy of Outer Space | The Fermi Paradox | Part 1

แชร์
ฝัง
  • เผยแพร่เมื่อ 8 ก.พ. 2025

ความคิดเห็น • 24

  • @NewportPíoneer27
    @NewportPíoneer27 4 หลายเดือนก่อน +7

    This guy deserves a raise for these incredible animations and magnificent text layouts.

  • @helloInternets
    @helloInternets 2 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    Sovereign: The pattern has repeated itself more times than you can fathom. Organic civilizations rise, evolve, advance. And at the apex of their glory, they are extinguished.
    Sovereign: The Protheans were not the first. They did not create the Citadel. They did not forge the mass relays. They merely found them, the legacy of my kind.

  • @hankkingofmischief4372
    @hankkingofmischief4372 4 หลายเดือนก่อน

    I enjoy this channels aesthetics

  • @Asankeket
    @Asankeket 4 หลายเดือนก่อน

    A fascinating topic, and I'm looking forward to the other videos aboutm space. As for the Fermi Paradox, one great filter we might have passed is the development of eucaryotes and multi-cellular life. Life itself appeared on Earth almost immediately after it was cool enough, just a few hundred million years after the planet formed, or that's what scientists mostly conclude from the available evidence. However, after that, it took at least three billion years for multicellular life to appear. That's a very long time for a planet to remain stable enough in supporting life, even on an astrononomical timescale.

  • @DRayL_
    @DRayL_ 4 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    I certainly HOPE my next "Matrix simulation" places me in a MUCH better body. This one totally sucks.
    Great video!

  • @realDonaldMcElvy
    @realDonaldMcElvy 4 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

    The Truth is out there...

  • @Girono01
    @Girono01 2 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Would you ever make a video on Wittgenstein’s hinge epistemology?? Expounded upon in his work “On Certainty”. It would be a good watch.

  • @kapi_yakumo
    @kapi_yakumo 4 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Philosophy has finally gone out of this world

  • @RENATVS_IV
    @RENATVS_IV 4 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Not only the content of the video is very cool and important for Philosophy, but also, there is an improvement in the way you present it 🤌

  • @kataliyun226
    @kataliyun226 4 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Needs to mention the thinkers who contributed to this nascent field next, e.g. the proponents of Fermi Paradox Solutions and list the papers where they explained their ideas

  • @Pfhorrest
    @Pfhorrest 4 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Send clean spacecraft containing isolated extremophiles to first thoroughly check planets for existing life and if there definitely is none then plant some. And in general, get AI out there all over space with a mission to both preserve and create. And get that down here with that mission too, while we're at it.

    • @CarneadesOfCyrene
      @CarneadesOfCyrene  4 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

      Interesting solution! I like it.

  • @AttilaM-p6x
    @AttilaM-p6x 3 หลายเดือนก่อน

    6:49 Don't you mean, oldest planet? The older the planet, the more likely that life has emerged on it.

  • @real_pattern
    @real_pattern 4 หลายเดือนก่อน

    dark forest ftw

    • @Asankeket
      @Asankeket 4 หลายเดือนก่อน

      That is a flawed explanation, since it seems to be extremely difficult for a civilization to hide itself from others. Our civilization will have already revealed itself to anyone within a hundred light years or so, and also we are already at the cusp of being able to detect biosignatures on planets thousands of light years away. In fact JWST may have already detected biosignatures, the scientists are just unable, at the moment, to rule out alternative explanations with enough confidence.

    • @real_pattern
      @real_pattern 4 หลายเดือนก่อน

      @@Asankeket i'm not sure what data you're drawing on, since currently we're the n=1, the only civilization we know exists. the universe is *large af* or perhaps infinite. there's no reason to assume that the closest civilization is within distances we can ever reach.

    • @Frozo-nt2ky
      @Frozo-nt2ky 4 หลายเดือนก่อน

      @@real_patternobviously this criticism loops back fully to your own argument

    • @real_pattern
      @real_pattern 4 หลายเดือนก่อน

      @@Frozo-nt2ky not necessarily, bc there may be clusters of advanced civilizations that are nevertheless far from us but closer to each other. idk though, the dark forest hypothesis doesn't entail that hiding is extremely difficult.

  • @CorndogMaker
    @CorndogMaker 4 หลายเดือนก่อน

    it's not a paradox because of the size of space.

  • @AgustusAtrahasis
    @AgustusAtrahasis 3 หลายเดือนก่อน

    That "paradox" is just a cope invented to ignore that God created this world, so life on Earth is safely sustained through lots of years.

    • @BoomShanka29
      @BoomShanka29 2 หลายเดือนก่อน

      Which God?

    • @AgustusAtrahasis
      @AgustusAtrahasis 2 หลายเดือนก่อน

      @@BoomShanka29 the way we define God itself proves there's only One God.
      Everything is contengient so things depend on energy to exist (they consume energy and move by that), and every force has to come from somewhere, to claim entropy existed forever is absurd, cuz entropy is caused, and by infinite regress (fallacy) you can never come to a beginning point, which refutes itself. So there has to be a beginning point, thus, the First Creator is the Necessary Being by logic, cuz God created space-time, He is beyond space-time and forms, so He's limitless, eternal and formless, there can't be two limitless, so there's no other God, and He's not limited into space-time, so He isn't a living being among us, and as He's not bond by forms by logic, it refutes He's nothing like what people describe, it means all those images people are worshipping aren't gods. Jesus, Krishna, Zeus, so on, who're claimedly walking forms, they're all fake by logic.
      It's hard to make it short for those who don't know, so if you've questions, you can ask.
      In short, He's the Creator of everything.

  • @Carneadesorg
    @Carneadesorg 4 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    When will you make Video about Augustine's book against academic?