Why shouldn't laws be made gender-neutral??? Why can't male victims seek justice and why shouldn't female perpetrators be punished??? Shame on Indian legal system.
Inquiring about the groom's job, his salary, his house condition, and whether he has siblings or not to assume how much family property he will get, which will eventually be their daughters' property in the future, etc., are equal to a dowry.
The anchor is a clown...he says he doesnt endorse comitting suicide as way of putting your point but the fact is that his channel is conducting this show only because of the suicide. I dont know how these people face themselves in the mirror
Dont know why everyone is taking about 498a. In reality it is DVC and 125 that are more detrimental. 498a is a criminal complaint and it is super hard to prove and hence there are so many acquittals in these cases. But 125 and DVC are laws through which women can legally extort money from men. This anchor is highly biased, he doesnt really wants to understand the pain on men's side.
If wife want to leave husband -- just go away freely and find a job if you do not already have one. Do not kill husband. No maintenance to alimony to wife. If mother cannot maintain children give the children to father. Shut down family courts and pay no salary to family courts.
This 498a is destroying our both families specifically man's family suffer a lot like a trauma , given by British to make people not live in harmonies as it was easy to them they could rule india easily so now this is new india it must be dismissed in law for sake of life of talented youth in india.
This is a larger conspiracy against Hindus ...The very article will either dissuades or fail a hindu marraige and thus will deminish the hindu population. The same is not applicable for Non-Hindu as they have there own personal law board. Note the Bill was by a Hindu ....REnuka Chowdary (Congress) and the Corrupt Judge in this case is Hindu Rita Kaushik Needless to say about the Corrupt Police etc etc.
Misuse of 498a is now reached to a next level,it's high time to show equality means . Just add all laws against boys family members and insult harassment
The side stepping that the host of the channel is doing. Looks like if he says openly and call out the bias against men, his gf or wife is going to kick him out of the house tonight. What a joke this is.
Irony is a life has to go for people/ system to awaken or at most come to a discussion table. Shows a gap/lack in the competency in framework with such laws.
Clearly biased and tries to put anyone making statements in favour of Atul on the spot. Some debate this is…even goes to the extent of clearly pointing it out at the end, as if afraid that someone might still be in favour of Atul. Let men suffer who cares.. did not expect it from this channel. Guess sophistication does not mean empathy or impartiality.
A marriage is arranged only after the (financial) expectations/demands of both the families are agreed. Why demands from the bride (well settled, wealthy, good salary/earnings) are not classified as dowry? If a husband is expected to bring his share of family wealth, why not a wife? A wife has her share of wealth from her parents and also from her husband. But a husband can't claim wife's wealth. Law should be gender neutral.
Deepikaji is genuinely working for rights of men.Others are just promoting themselves by appearing on tv
There are some other women like Antara Das, Jyoti Tiwari Panday, Barkha Trehan, Nandini Bhattacharya and Arnaz Madam
Why shouldn't laws be made gender-neutral??? Why can't male victims seek justice and why shouldn't female perpetrators be punished??? Shame on Indian legal system.
Faminist NGOs
It's not Indian legal system bro it's women's legal system
Inquiring about the groom's job, his salary, his house condition, and whether he has siblings or not to assume how much family property he will get, which will eventually be their daughters' property in the future, etc., are equal to a dowry.
agreed
We need one more law...
If the woman is unable to prove the allegations, then she should be sent to prison for atleast 7 years
Not 7 rather 25 years atleast so that she can’t marry again and harass another innocent man 🫡
Also she should pay for defamation
How come every one facing Ipc498a package
The anchor is a clown...he says he doesnt endorse comitting suicide as way of putting your point but the fact is that his channel is conducting this show only because of the suicide.
I dont know how these people face themselves in the mirror
Absolutely correct
Means if husband paid 3 CR
All crime is vanish
Wow great
one step solution, this is an expensive one my brothers: Carry spy cams with you everywhere.
Sorry to say.. women do ask dowry in a way of good paying job own houses cars and should only 1 son etc...
Divorce industry is worth more than 20,000 crore. Everybody makes money out of husband.
Dont know why everyone is taking about 498a. In reality it is DVC and 125 that are more detrimental. 498a is a criminal complaint and it is super hard to prove and hence there are so many acquittals in these cases. But 125 and DVC are laws through which women can legally extort money from men. This anchor is highly biased, he doesnt really wants to understand the pain on men's side.
The lawyers who filed the cases should also be investigated.
Most of the Lawyers add gruesome allegations to make the case stronger
im not really understanding whos side the advocate and lawyer are on
Women's
If wife want to leave husband -- just go away freely and find a job if you do not already have one. Do not kill husband. No maintenance to alimony to wife. If mother cannot maintain children give the children to father.
Shut down family courts and pay no salary to family courts.
This 498a is destroying our both families specifically man's family suffer a lot like a trauma , given by British to make people not live in harmonies as it was easy to them they could rule india easily so now this is new india it must be dismissed in law for sake of life of talented youth in india.
This is a larger conspiracy against Hindus ...The very article will either dissuades or fail a hindu marraige and thus will deminish the hindu population. The same is not applicable for Non-Hindu as they have there own personal law board.
Note the Bill was by a Hindu ....REnuka Chowdary (Congress)
and the Corrupt Judge in this case is Hindu Rita Kaushik
Needless to say about the Corrupt Police etc etc.
In every show she would start with her history classes ..😂😂. 4:28
Need to reform matrimonial laws by gender neutral. Don’t punish innocent men. Man lives matter!
Mentality of men needs to be changed
Especially in up bihar etc.
Misuse of 498a is now reached to a next level,it's high time to show equality means . Just add all laws against boys family members and insult harassment
The side stepping that the host of the channel is doing. Looks like if he says openly and call out the bias against men, his gf or wife is going to kick him out of the house tonight. What a joke this is.
or maybe he is afraid of losing his job
Why should husband pay life long alimony to wife for few monrhs of staying together.
5:41 how can you arrest a man even on fake cases??😑
Yes it's become a way of getting dowry by way settling 498A case from the man.
Nawazuddin should also come in front, he faces issues as well
the basic issue is there is no mutual respect for each other , all our discussions are mostly conforntational
Anchor has certain mindset.... I feel Atul committed suicide thinking "If the deaf are to hear, then the sound has to be very loud"
Yes, he is true husband side father, mother, sisters , brothers n they children future is destroyed.
Please cover SSC CGL 2024 scam
My cousin is also a victim of dowry
Those who agree to give dowry are also equally responsible
Why did you paid should have just said no for marriage
Irony is a life has to go for people/ system to awaken or at most come to a discussion table.
Shows a gap/lack in the competency in framework with such laws.
Clearly biased and tries to put anyone making statements in favour of Atul on the spot. Some debate this is…even goes to the extent of clearly pointing it out at the end, as if afraid that someone might still be in favour of Atul. Let men suffer who cares.. did not expect it from this channel. Guess sophistication does not mean empathy or impartiality.
A marriage is arranged only after the (financial) expectations/demands of both the families are agreed. Why demands from the bride (well settled, wealthy, good salary/earnings) are not classified as dowry? If a husband is expected to bring his share of family wealth, why not a wife? A wife has her share of wealth from her parents and also from her husband. But a husband can't claim wife's wealth. Law should be gender neutral.
This is a cultural issues. A educated man and woman with spine will build their house and home with both participation.