Why Modern Art Is So Expensive | So Expensive

แชร์
ฝัง
  • เผยแพร่เมื่อ 24 ก.ย. 2024
  • Modern art is expensive. From completely white canvases to simple abstract colours, these seemingly basic works can cost you millions. So what makes their price so high and how can they possibly be worth this much money?
    For more of Josef Neet's work: / josef_neet
    MORE SO EXPENSIVE:
    Why Gold Is So Expensive | So Expensive
    • Why Gold Is So Expensi...
    Why Apple Products Are So Expensive | So Expensive
    • Why Apple Products Are...
    Why Avocados Are So Expensive | So Expensive
    • Why Avocados Are So Ex...
    ------------------------------------------------------
    #ModernArt #SoExpensive #BusinessInsider
    Business Insider tells you all you need to know about business, finance, tech, retail, and more.
    Visit us at: www.businessin...
    Subscribe: / businessinsider
    BI on Facebook: read.bi/2xOcEcj
    BI on Instagram: read.bi/2Q2D29T
    BI on Twitter: read.bi/2xCnzGF
    BI on Amazon Prime: read.bi/PrimeVideo
    Why Modern Art Is So Expensive | So Expensive

ความคิดเห็น • 18K

  • @roilangarcia
    @roilangarcia 3 ปีที่แล้ว +29682

    Before, I do not understand why modern art is very expensive. But after watching this, I still do not understand why modern art is so expensive.

    • @deannajohnson3933
      @deannajohnson3933 3 ปีที่แล้ว +693

      Oddly, me too.

    • @jadeandblood
      @jadeandblood 3 ปีที่แล้ว +1096

      Yea this video tells nothing lmao

    • @celesteinfantino1409
      @celesteinfantino1409 3 ปีที่แล้ว +2325

      Modern art is expensive because it is one of the easiest ways to launder money.

    • @maryamkhalid5889
      @maryamkhalid5889 3 ปีที่แล้ว +52

      Same

    • @chalkid3390
      @chalkid3390 3 ปีที่แล้ว +71

      @@celesteinfantino1409 Marty Byrde moment

  • @HB-lx3wv
    @HB-lx3wv 4 ปีที่แล้ว +18945

    I have a painting to sell. Its a white canvas that wasnt even touched by paint. I call it nothingness. Starting bid is 5 million.

    • @niharikaaredla5799
      @niharikaaredla5799 4 ปีที่แล้ว +249

      H B 🤣🤣🤣

    • @ffrebello
      @ffrebello 4 ปีที่แล้ว +968

      ☝️ 5.5 million in nothing dollars lol

    • @HB-lx3wv
      @HB-lx3wv 4 ปีที่แล้ว +818

      @@ffrebello sorry, somebody dm'ed me 9.8million before ur bid

    • @Marcel-il2te
      @Marcel-il2te 4 ปีที่แล้ว +242

      I must have it!!!

    • @HB-lx3wv
      @HB-lx3wv 4 ปีที่แล้ว +208

      @@Marcel-il2te put a bid on it, or are you all talk?

  • @satriaamiluhur622
    @satriaamiluhur622 4 ปีที่แล้ว +46651

    I feel bad for all the artists with actual skills and creativity being unnoticed out there

    • @richieblack5530
      @richieblack5530 4 ปีที่แล้ว +3985

      When it comes to art and business it isn't about talent or skill but more about who you know

    • @anapaulatavares1931
      @anapaulatavares1931 4 ปีที่แล้ว +530

      I think they are aware you can't do it for the money.

    • @PrivatePrivate-do2on
      @PrivatePrivate-do2on 4 ปีที่แล้ว +144

      The most wealthy living artists are called "art fabricators" they don't actually make it. The biggest art dealer in the world is called the PT Barnum of the art world.

    • @d3r4g45
      @d3r4g45 4 ปีที่แล้ว +677

      People with actual talents and skills are plenty. Beauty is abundant and plentiful, therefore cheap. Scarcity is what costs.

    • @CWJ0725
      @CWJ0725 4 ปีที่แล้ว +822

      C O I’m sure all the kindergarten kids could produce all these pieces of modern contemporary shits.

  • @FeliciaHines-ng2cg
    @FeliciaHines-ng2cg 8 หลายเดือนก่อน +448

    To me, this is a slap in the face for every hard working, underpaid animators and comic artists.

    • @deathOfTheWinterMoon
      @deathOfTheWinterMoon 5 หลายเดือนก่อน +6

      Thank you 😭😭🙏

    • @SleepyMatt-zzz
      @SleepyMatt-zzz 5 หลายเดือนก่อน +13

      Don't worry, a lot of these artists don't see much of a return either. A lot of money earned by artists actually goes to art dealers and galleries.

    • @Pamela-dv7gb
      @Pamela-dv7gb 4 หลายเดือนก่อน

      And even for every people able to make beautifull paint made whit oil of flowers or anything realist and I admit it’s not original but at least it look good and there is work to make it

    • @TheWaitingRoomTWR
      @TheWaitingRoomTWR 3 หลายเดือนก่อน +3

      Ahhh yes because Stan Lee has only made pennies from his comics what a slap in the face

    • @houlester
      @houlester 2 หลายเดือนก่อน

      Throw some paint on a canvas on the side for extra money.

  • @reversal2341
    @reversal2341 2 ปีที่แล้ว +5224

    Feels like the secret of modern art is not the art skill itself, but the skill about how good are you at persuading people into something

    • @emperorthylord
      @emperorthylord 2 ปีที่แล้ว +101

      It's money laundering and tax frauds.

    • @soulblazer6232
      @soulblazer6232 2 ปีที่แล้ว +184

      scamming people is a form of art

    • @OphiuchiChannel
      @OphiuchiChannel 2 ปีที่แล้ว +8

      Most artists dont create to make a fortune. Jeff Koons and Diamen Hirst are exceptions.

    • @hughmiller7127
      @hughmiller7127 2 ปีที่แล้ว +2

      @@emperorthylord You can't launder money through art and it be the dumbest way.

    • @hughmiller7127
      @hughmiller7127 2 ปีที่แล้ว +5

      Except most Modern Artist are dead, and the one that are selling high are dead. Also Modern art is not all cubism, Minimalism, Impressionism, Expressionism, and Abstract, they are many styles each with their own set of rules and philosophy.

  • @mrspo7012
    @mrspo7012 3 ปีที่แล้ว +2795

    As an artist I find this.. how do I say it, sarcastically irritating.

    • @henrywu8500
      @henrywu8500 3 ปีที่แล้ว +115

      I luckily have not reached too deep into this passion I have... after watching this video it’s like destroying something that resembles who I am... now I feel like it is pointless to understand the anatomy of the human body, the techniques of brushes, pen and pencils, etc, because all these will result in a piece “less beautiful” than what museum artists creates.

    • @mrspo7012
      @mrspo7012 3 ปีที่แล้ว +75

      @@henrywu8500 ik it is disappointing but it is never useless, you should never give up on something you like.. no matter what others think about it.. those pieces that got sold for high prices are the best example that money doesn't truly value your art

    • @jedibjj5488
      @jedibjj5488 3 ปีที่แล้ว +9

      Me too i hated it in art college .

    • @lauren-sq5cd
      @lauren-sq5cd 3 ปีที่แล้ว +2

      @@henrywu8500 yeah, it made me feel the same way...

    • @monica_g456
      @monica_g456 3 ปีที่แล้ว +17

      Though I can't really call myself a good artist, I enjoy drawing, from each sketch to the lineart. And I can't help but agree with you. . . I can't even fathom wth happened to modern art.

  • @FRISHR
    @FRISHR 3 ปีที่แล้ว +8213

    Basically rich people spend millions on random art to launder their money, so they don’t have to pay taxes since it counts as a donation/charity.

    • @sonofhibbs4425
      @sonofhibbs4425 3 ปีที่แล้ว +866

      Aaaand BINGO..here we have the actual answer.

    • @SkywardWords
      @SkywardWords 3 ปีที่แล้ว +231

      Wow that's actually very true

    • @justinysuncle6721
      @justinysuncle6721 3 ปีที่แล้ว +146

      You have the right idea my friend

    • @KitKatWiffleBallBat
      @KitKatWiffleBallBat 3 ปีที่แล้ว +165

      This is what I was expecting."It's controlled by a bunch of rich CEO psychopaths/sociopaths." But your answer is probably very true as well.
      So they don't discuss this in the video then? Then I suppose I already know the answer. Moving on...back to reading, I guess.

    • @aminewaffleuwu15
      @aminewaffleuwu15 3 ปีที่แล้ว +35

      Wait that’s how it works?

  • @Toyslasher
    @Toyslasher ปีที่แล้ว +295

    I remember having spent about two weeks on a painting that would go towards me college gallery. I wasn't expecting to win anything but I was just happy it got shown. It was a very emotional piece that I spent much time and thought towards. Only for my work to not just win anything, but not even make it in the gallery. Instead this guy walked in with 50 or so paintings of simple lines and colors and he would explain his "thought process" on it. None of it made any sense, just giberish. And of course he received pats on the back and money out of it. It was extemely discouraging. Unless you have connections, money, or power, your dream as an artist will die with you.

    • @BunnyLang
      @BunnyLang ปีที่แล้ว +13

      There is truth to this, an artist's work can be promoted like a product and invested in so as to create a marketplace for investment purposes. But the artist's work has to grow over time. Don't let a college situation hold you back or make. you believe this is the total truth because it is not. Perhaps you need to find your. niche, there are art collectors out there who aren't necessarily millionaires but see the value in your work. Talk about the meaning behind your paintings, create a connection with the viewer based upon this. How to find collectors? I'm praying about this myself. I do believe in the power of prayer. However, you may not believe in that and that's okay. There is information out there that can teach you, or at least lead you to find your niche and your own collectors. All the best.

    • @m1churr0
      @m1churr0 ปีที่แล้ว

      @@davidhetherman8127 imagined if you spent two weeks putting your all into something only for a scribble to win. that's not jealousy, it just feels awful.

    • @ahmedm.7432
      @ahmedm.7432 ปีที่แล้ว +11

      ​@@davidhetherman8127ok? So he have all the right to be jealous angry and sad like why would he the one the approximately spent half-hour drawing lines to win that is absurd

    • @stielimusterman3066
      @stielimusterman3066 11 หลายเดือนก่อน +15

      @@davidhetherman8127
      Ur probably just a modern "artist“...

    • @feyrol42
      @feyrol42 11 หลายเดือนก่อน +13

      You need to learn to sell your art. That guy knew how to sell his work, you clearly didn’t. If you want to be a working artist that has their pieces in galleries then you need to craft stories around your work, create mythology, charm curators, collectors. Simply making good art is not enough, sad but true. You’re venturing into the business side of things which is a skill set of its own. You have to sharpen your social skills and build those networks that will get you through the door.

  • @LocketInThinePocket
    @LocketInThinePocket 4 ปีที่แล้ว +6040

    Buyer: Truly a masterpiece...the artist must have thought long on this...I can feel their thoughts touching me spiritually.
    Artist: haha paint go sploosh

    • @vibaj16
      @vibaj16 4 ปีที่แล้ว +236

      WisteriaRotting kindergarten teachers are having the top paying jobs. Just gotta sell their 5 year old students’ art for tens of millions of dollars

    • @AA-po3hn
      @AA-po3hn 4 ปีที่แล้ว +3

      Don't say that.

    • @BlueBaeChai
      @BlueBaeChai 4 ปีที่แล้ว +6

      Lol

    • @rmswifeoreo6719
      @rmswifeoreo6719 4 ปีที่แล้ว +15

      LMFAo yeah pretty much

    • @sharmintareque
      @sharmintareque 4 ปีที่แล้ว

      Eshal A Hey, we have the same name!!!

  • @pyjuscurus3825
    @pyjuscurus3825 3 ปีที่แล้ว +2806

    My art teacher told me this quite a while ago and i still remember it until now for how great it was.
    "Modern art isn't about art, it's about the artist. First, you have to make yourself known and apreciated by actually making good paintings and then you can make modern art because people will buy it because it was painted by you, not because of how it looks. "
    Amen

    • @afunkylittleguy
      @afunkylittleguy 3 ปีที่แล้ว +186

      Yes, this is what people are missing. They think an artist just makes one of these paintings and sells it for over a million. No they have to have a whole history of artwork.

    • @wood2640
      @wood2640 3 ปีที่แล้ว +70

      Actually it all bullshit.

    • @wood2640
      @wood2640 3 ปีที่แล้ว +58

      @@praytherosaryforpeace1204 yes . Same opinion. It all bullshit. They make you feel it strange so you believe it above your understanding. The truth it all bullshit. Litterally bullshit. Throw piss and shit in the wall. Wah lah... an art

    • @jedibjj5488
      @jedibjj5488 3 ปีที่แล้ว +16

      Not all ways true.

    • @proximaism
      @proximaism 3 ปีที่แล้ว +20

      Kim Kardashian's poop is still poop

  • @arianrahman4840
    @arianrahman4840 4 ปีที่แล้ว +2859

    I used to be a modern artist back when i was 3-4 years old and eating paint and dirt

    • @ivansupetran2914
      @ivansupetran2914 3 ปีที่แล้ว +10

      Lol

    • @Ryomei_Asta
      @Ryomei_Asta 3 ปีที่แล้ว +4

      😂ik

    • @euphoricepitome66
      @euphoricepitome66 3 ปีที่แล้ว +4

      @John Carter So true 😂😭

    • @cliffdawg9800
      @cliffdawg9800 3 ปีที่แล้ว +2

      @@euphoricepitome66 ah yes *truer*

    • @milo8165
      @milo8165 3 ปีที่แล้ว +5

      A little more of eating glue and booger your value will rise drastically

  • @evelynaaspidov123
    @evelynaaspidov123 ปีที่แล้ว +227

    I went to the Chicago Art institute and stood in awe. Literal AWE looking at the paintings by Van Gogh. You can get so close that you can see every brushstroke.
    Then we went to the modern art side and I felt sick. Not only were the paintings pointless. But so many gave me the creeps. I got out of there as soon as I could.

    • @usagi009
      @usagi009 ปีที่แล้ว +16

      The ' creep ' I felt that. I too am so sick of this modern art

    • @somerobloxdude3699
      @somerobloxdude3699 ปีที่แล้ว +11

      @@davidhetherman8127i imagine this comment with your voice to be the stereotypical british with string quintet in e major playing in the background OR a fat american discord mod who complains about memes in general

    • @jojostar88
      @jojostar88 9 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

      It's the energy that people are imprinting into the artwork, intentionally or unintentionally, that can feel creepy or amazing....depending on the vibes infused🤸💫

    • @ronbarok4
      @ronbarok4 5 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      years and years wasted in art school and we get this trash🤣 a toddler can do better

    • @kunaljanvalkar2850
      @kunaljanvalkar2850 4 หลายเดือนก่อน

      ​@@jojostar88You sound like someone who believes in astrology...

  • @gabrielefarina9103
    @gabrielefarina9103 4 ปีที่แล้ว +8747

    “Art isn’t about beauty, it never really was”
    Italian Renaissance: Am i joke to you?

    • @marciocouto3543
      @marciocouto3543 4 ปีที่แล้ว +105

      Well, Italian Renaissance wasn't exactly about beauty, you know?

    • @gabrielefarina9103
      @gabrielefarina9103 4 ปีที่แล้ว +448

      Marcio Couto so Botticelli and his la Nascita di Venere, the David of Michelangelo? That actually are standard of beauty, and you can find hundreds of pieces, that are an example of astonishing beauty. Just think at the sculptures, with ripped muscles during different action like fighting, or just staring. Aren’t them beauty?

    • @gabrielefarina9103
      @gabrielefarina9103 4 ปีที่แล้ว +154

      I think only a blind won’t see beauty looking at La Pietà, or Mosè.

    • @danie7kovacs
      @danie7kovacs 4 ปีที่แล้ว +37

      @@gabrielefarina9103 It is not that they are not beautiful, but rather that beauty comes in all forms and shapes.

    • @marciocouto3543
      @marciocouto3543 4 ปีที่แล้ว +71

      @@gabrielefarina9103 they are beautiful, obviously, but Renaissance was about much more also.

  • @juliusmendoza8382
    @juliusmendoza8382 4 ปีที่แล้ว +2538

    I’m an artists and I do realism, and when I’m drawing realism it takes me time a precision, getting the exact colors right, and making sure all the proportions are correct. Just seeing someone splatter some paint and calling it a day kind of irritates me because artists that are struggling because people don’t find realism as fascinating as contemporary art struggle

    • @lexitnute1306
      @lexitnute1306 4 ปีที่แล้ว +76

      Omg that hurts!!😢😢😢😢😢😭😭

    • @shom924
      @shom924 4 ปีที่แล้ว +62

      Julius Mendoza ikr it might have thought or whatever but it takes literally no skill

    • @Pathrissia
      @Pathrissia 4 ปีที่แล้ว +10

      Agreed

    • @farrelsamdyanasywah615
      @farrelsamdyanasywah615 4 ปีที่แล้ว +63

      @@shom924 I can do that random splatter shit that most of the artist in the video do

    • @FirstLast-cj4uz
      @FirstLast-cj4uz 4 ปีที่แล้ว +36

      Iovanska Berenice Delgadillo Villa yeah my dad does abstract but it’s kinda a mix between that and realism and he draws people and I know most people can’t do it so I hate how people just do a squiggle and call it abstract

  • @xrayfalconx2528
    @xrayfalconx2528 3 ปีที่แล้ว +1326

    It actually pisses me off that there are genuinely talented artists out there but shit like this is what is people are willing to pay millions for.

    • @wumbology3109
      @wumbology3109 3 ปีที่แล้ว +47

      idk man, my fkin mind blown up and turn into pile of turd. Why do they even call these things art what the heck, it's fkin bright paint slathered by 5 years old child wtf?

    • @andrewhartmangunsmith2755
      @andrewhartmangunsmith2755 3 ปีที่แล้ว +36

      It's simply because of too many rich people either launder money through "art", or to show off or to invest their money. In other words, there are 1000s of Billionaires and 100 millions of millionaires who are willing to buy due to the above mentioned reasons or simply to climb the elite social class.
      Or many buyers, obviously the ones who can afford to buy anything they want worth 100s of million dollars buy it simply because they like it and can afford it. Personally, I feel most of it are a scam. If the ones auctioned for millions were on someones yardsale they wouldn't even fetch a 100 bucks!

    • @Starrrwarrrs6rbluey
      @Starrrwarrrs6rbluey 3 ปีที่แล้ว +13

      My turd is nicer then these art work

    • @pogoose1007
      @pogoose1007 3 ปีที่แล้ว +2

      @@Starrrwarrrs6rbluey lol

    • @butbunwin3107
      @butbunwin3107 3 ปีที่แล้ว +3

      Actually this is all about billionaires paint themselves and buy it for their own paint. Garbage painting can cost 100000trillions dollars if the owner paint on it own and buy it.

  • @pkplayz7711
    @pkplayz7711 ปีที่แล้ว +453

    In short: the art doesn't has value, the artist has the value!

    • @sanvigupta6141
      @sanvigupta6141 ปีที่แล้ว +14

      Beautifully put

    • @lel6801
      @lel6801 ปีที่แล้ว +6

      this is brilliant

    • @junokyael
      @junokyael ปีที่แล้ว +2

      Present form instead of past form, change "has" to "have"

    • @Pearl1010
      @Pearl1010 ปีที่แล้ว +4

      @@junokyael 🤓

    • @Elixir9
      @Elixir9 ปีที่แล้ว

      PK playz
      if its a pice of s*it on canvas doesn't matter who made it it's still a piece of s*it

  • @zenwisteria3736
    @zenwisteria3736 3 ปีที่แล้ว +1915

    Meanwhile There are many beautiful traditional artwork all around the world which are on the brink of disappearing.
    Sometimes I just don't understand people.😭

    • @zeratulofaiur2589
      @zeratulofaiur2589 3 ปีที่แล้ว +67

      That's what happens with "liberal arts" schools and their curriculum.

    • @tanya.c6615
      @tanya.c6615 3 ปีที่แล้ว +85

      So much REAL talent hidden away while people go about buying splatters of paint on canvas for millions

    • @smiley_face2872
      @smiley_face2872 3 ปีที่แล้ว +18

      I don’t think they’re on the verge of disappearing? Many old styles/techniques are still very relevant! I’m pretty sure in most art schools they make you try many different techniques like both modern and traditional. There’s nothing wrong with liking different types of art as long as it doesn’t hurt anybody!

    • @an_38kitkashyap
      @an_38kitkashyap 3 ปีที่แล้ว +44

      There are places in India where they will make some of the most beautiful hand woven design on a piece of cloth, but they're barely earning anything for a living and are forced to find other jobs. On the other hand, splashing paints on a piece of paper are being sold for millions.

    • @celineragnarto6546
      @celineragnarto6546 3 ปีที่แล้ว

      Nah most of people are on digital they're switching now though...

  • @criticaltransmission6643
    @criticaltransmission6643 3 ปีที่แล้ว +1268

    Its expensive because someone has to launder a large amount of money.

    • @karlaanchondo
      @karlaanchondo 3 ปีที่แล้ว +19

      But why they don't pick actual good paintings to do that?

    • @MaestroTunes
      @MaestroTunes 3 ปีที่แล้ว +34

      @@karlaanchondo they do buy good ones but they buy those for cheap i dont think that someone with the skill to create a real masterpiece would want to take place in money laundering schemes at the very least it would feel like an insult to the effort put into it

    • @aravinds3846
      @aravinds3846 3 ปีที่แล้ว +12

      The good ones at track attention. These shit ones transaction is covered up. Also there are tax laws regarding art which have loopholes around them which can be exploited

    • @828burke
      @828burke 3 ปีที่แล้ว +10

      @@karlaanchondo laundering requires that the actual transaction is worth less than the money being transferred.

    • @Odin31b
      @Odin31b 3 ปีที่แล้ว +2

      @@MaestroTunes until you're hungry. Ever heard of a starving artist?

  • @abcdefghijklmnopqrstuvwyxz102
    @abcdefghijklmnopqrstuvwyxz102 3 ปีที่แล้ว +702

    Van gogh died thinking he was never good enough with no recognition yet these people literally just splash paint on the canvas and get famous. It's honestly sad.

    • @g.o.a.t4380
      @g.o.a.t4380 3 ปีที่แล้ว +3

      That's not dad thayts smartness of artists

    • @MrExcessum
      @MrExcessum 3 ปีที่แล้ว +36

      Its just basic money laundering, most of these have no artistic value.

    • @theleafshandsomedevil1552
      @theleafshandsomedevil1552 3 ปีที่แล้ว +18

      Worst thing is that after his death, greedy art dealers took advantage and (no offense to him; he was still unique and worthy of success during his time on earth) over-exaggerated his name, adding way more value to the art than the contents of the paintings themselves.
      I grow tired of artists being popular by their stories over the quality of their artwork. I don’t care if someone had a difficult life, what I care about is that their art is skillfully and well composed.

    • @oscarosullivan4513
      @oscarosullivan4513 3 ปีที่แล้ว +4

      @@theleafshandsomedevil1552 A lot of van gogh’s work is well composed but I agree

    • @oscarosullivan4513
      @oscarosullivan4513 3 ปีที่แล้ว +4

      I love a starry night

  • @hansolodolo92
    @hansolodolo92 ปีที่แล้ว +34

    Everytime i see modern art i Just sit and think of how hard I worked to learn the techniques of the masters. And how many years of dedication that took. Its so infuriating

  • @HowtolucidOfficial
    @HowtolucidOfficial 3 ปีที่แล้ว +3230

    It MUST be some kind of money laundering scheme.. I mean 99% of 'modern art' literally looks like a child did it, and ANYONE could make something that looks either the same, or better with NO skill required whastoever.

    • @O.LEO.N
      @O.LEO.N 3 ปีที่แล้ว +25

      Not 99%. WAY less.

    • @madara6668
      @madara6668 3 ปีที่แล้ว +331

      @@O.LEO.N yeah 100%

    • @O.LEO.N
      @O.LEO.N 3 ปีที่แล้ว +9

      @@madara6668 No i mean that that's not right at all.

    • @Harry11enderson
      @Harry11enderson 3 ปีที่แล้ว +200

      Its a way for rich people as a tax write off

    • @SayYourSomething
      @SayYourSomething 3 ปีที่แล้ว +101

      The “art” in this video is what I call “Tax art”, in which the rich use to get less taxes. REAL modern art is more about the meaning aspect of the art rather than the appearance.
      While you don’t have to be obligated to like it I just wanted to tell you and people reading this.

  • @abhimanyookarve5778
    @abhimanyookarve5778 3 ปีที่แล้ว +3046

    I am 22. I can proudly say that I am modern artist since 20 years.

    • @RagnarDanneskjold-Pirate
      @RagnarDanneskjold-Pirate 2 ปีที่แล้ว +85

      Winner - Comment of the Day.

    • @techwithmaadhesh6622
      @techwithmaadhesh6622 2 ปีที่แล้ว +19

      So, your name is 22 and you said that you r a modern artist 2 decades ago so now are you in your 40s?

    • @sreemapaul4943
      @sreemapaul4943 2 ปีที่แล้ว +8

      That was clever.....

    • @noice8674
      @noice8674 2 ปีที่แล้ว +64

      @@techwithmaadhesh6622 eat almonds bro

    • @kimfromnorthkorea
      @kimfromnorthkorea 2 ปีที่แล้ว +2

      maybe, but can you produce the same kind of completely free creativity today? no, because the past 20 years had an influence on you.

  • @aadharagarwal6648
    @aadharagarwal6648 3 ปีที่แล้ว +2017

    The back of my notebook: finally, a worthy opponent

    • @therealeren2045
      @therealeren2045 3 ปีที่แล้ว +101

      Me: *looks at notebook*
      Me to myself: so how much would people pay for a 10 second drawn penis with pubic hair?

    • @sohamparab2795
      @sohamparab2795 3 ปีที่แล้ว +9

      Hmmm

    • @ok4297
      @ok4297 3 ปีที่แล้ว +36

      Me: Looks into my baby sisters diaper while changer her, I'm a millionaire.

    • @yashkaran19
      @yashkaran19 3 ปีที่แล้ว +4

      @@ok4297 😂😂

    • @ameyaaa9260
      @ameyaaa9260 3 ปีที่แล้ว +13

      @@marinaaguas9219 20 mil . Going around once , going around twice.......

  • @bhavyasaxena_
    @bhavyasaxena_ ปีที่แล้ว +38

    As someone who paints acrylic paintings over the course of days, even looking at the modern “art” leaves me unsettled. Experimenting with colours is another thing, but selling it for this insane amount of money is absurd, because I find absolutely no way for it being worth that much. I don’t find this art, I simply find it colours slathered on a canvas. The main reason why I hate this is because the actual, real art, the detailing, the colour schemes that took actual time and effort are being overlooked because of this. For me, random brushstrokes will never be equal to a detailed work.

    • @Cpt_John_Price
      @Cpt_John_Price 4 วันที่ผ่านมา

      Meanwhile, some small minds called AI art "not art". Yet AI can draw more detailed pictures than whatever these things. Which makes them more of a "not art" than some AI pictures.
      This proves that AI art IS art, the definition does not count on who draws it.

  • @jaypark2177
    @jaypark2177 2 ปีที่แล้ว +4829

    I agree. Art isn't about Beauty. It can be grotesque, terrifying, sorrowful, or grating. Art is about feeling something.
    And when I look at these squiggles and shapes - I feel nothing.

    • @mikaellagracevarquez2961
      @mikaellagracevarquez2961 2 ปีที่แล้ว +242

      A round of applause to this!

    • @maiyukinoshita2458
      @maiyukinoshita2458 2 ปีที่แล้ว +62

      Hahahaha. Exactly

    • @smokegasplaynintendo5767
      @smokegasplaynintendo5767 2 ปีที่แล้ว +67

      How sad for you. Most of these pieces are amazing. Maybe you'd feel something if you witnessed them up close in person. Abstract art can really brighten up a room in a mysterious and wonderful way.
      Anybody can learn art/painting techniques over time and learn to master painting realistic portraits or realism. Abstract art on the other hand really can't be taught. It's a self taught journey an artist must go through and despite how simple and un-skilled or lack of talent you may think these abstract pieces showcase, you're wrong. It's actually very hard to produce good abstract art pieces in reality. Some really good artist make it look easy the way they splash their paint around but don't be fooled.

    • @maiyukinoshita2458
      @maiyukinoshita2458 2 ปีที่แล้ว +114

      @@smokegasplaynintendo5767 there are different kinds of abstract. So which do you think such art belongs to?

    • @W4ELU
      @W4ELU 2 ปีที่แล้ว +163

      Basically my kindergarten nephew can make my family a fortune if she splatters paint on her paper because we told her no snacks

  • @kalpitvalesh
    @kalpitvalesh 4 ปีที่แล้ว +3035

    And they still didn't give a "valid and logical" reason why art is expensive.

    • @alialavib
      @alialavib 4 ปีที่แล้ว +294

      money laundering that's why

    • @px4536
      @px4536 4 ปีที่แล้ว +88

      there is nothing logical about art, its all about feeling

    • @benmemon
      @benmemon 4 ปีที่แล้ว +38

      Its just a scribble

    • @madzee8139
      @madzee8139 4 ปีที่แล้ว +29

      Elitism plays a role I reckon

    • @renlesterpantin7000
      @renlesterpantin7000 4 ปีที่แล้ว +13

      cause it unique and unrepeatable

  • @haritinasakova4327
    @haritinasakova4327 3 ปีที่แล้ว +387

    This makes me so angry... That shitty art is being sold for millions where amazing artists I follow sell artworks for a 100$-500$

    • @dalon6900
      @dalon6900 3 ปีที่แล้ว +32

      Couldn't agree more. It's also kinda sad that these millionaires and billionaires spend millions on this rubbish when there are millions around the globe starving to death.

    • @haritinasakova4327
      @haritinasakova4327 3 ปีที่แล้ว +3

      @ vibe ruiner

    • @Raja-id8hz
      @Raja-id8hz 3 ปีที่แล้ว +2

      True.ive seen people on the street drew their customer really well in under 5m and theiy are getting 50 fpr it

    • @georgewashingtonballs5603
      @georgewashingtonballs5603 3 ปีที่แล้ว +4

      @heimer donger If you make an income of 100 mil from that 37% of it goes to federal taxes alone. So 37 million dollars just taken from the government. Let's say you buy an art piece from an auction house for 10 million dollars. And you store it in a free port anonymously so taxes doesnt count on your art piece. Your art piece stays in the free port for 5 years. Auction houses always keep exclusive partnerships with artists and make sure the demand for their art goes up and keep marking the price up as time goes on. You can get an appraisal for your art piece, and because its from a famous auction house and a famous artist, its worth 50 mil now. You can donate this art piece to a museum and get a tax write off of 50 million from your 37 million taxes. The other 13 million can be evenly split for the next 5 years.

    • @georgewashingtonballs5603
      @georgewashingtonballs5603 3 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      @heimer donger they can evade taxes for a lot cheaper. The art is generally bad because auction houses dont really care about the product quality because the buyers dont care if it looks nice or not.

  • @Jack.Strait
    @Jack.Strait ปีที่แล้ว +14

    I think one of the biggest challenges in fighting the undeniable degeneracy of modern art is that it's really not enough to point out the laziness of the work. To really be effective in your criticism, you need to shift your focus towards modernism itself.

    • @SleepyMatt-zzz
      @SleepyMatt-zzz 5 หลายเดือนก่อน

      "degeneracy of modern art" careful what you say, that's what the Nazis said about the Modernists.

  • @baronliu2546
    @baronliu2546 3 ปีที่แล้ว +3253

    I watch this whole video but still don’t get why it’s so expensive

    • @ViaMirage
      @ViaMirage 3 ปีที่แล้ว +350

      Because it’s a scam.

    • @sadface6180
      @sadface6180 3 ปีที่แล้ว +373

      Rich people buy it so they can launder money and it can be considered as a "donation"

    • @khushigosar211
      @khushigosar211 3 ปีที่แล้ว +7

      Same

    • @lilyblack1979
      @lilyblack1979 3 ปีที่แล้ว +56

      Money laundering platform

    • @AnAirConditioner
      @AnAirConditioner 3 ปีที่แล้ว +66

      I am just going to get a white canvas and some paint and splash it on the canvas. Apparently people would like to buy it for over a million dollars so they won’t have to pay taxes. Fine by me

  • @Gamesha_Guy
    @Gamesha_Guy 3 ปีที่แล้ว +1543

    Is it just me or did no one say anything during this video? I didn’t hear a single explanation as to why it’s expensive

    • @henrywu8500
      @henrywu8500 3 ปีที่แล้ว +141

      They said it’s expensive because apparently “drawing realistically” is taken by photographers, so all they do is draw “simplicity”, something a goddamn ONE YEAR OLD can accidentally draw. Art can actually be amazing if people didn’t think drawing shapes is better than drawing like a photograph.

    • @peniskopf653
      @peniskopf653 3 ปีที่แล้ว +76

      @@henrywu8500 beeing abstract isnt bad in general. many REALLY famous artists did it but theres a big difference between a abstract van gogh wich resembles something you can actually feel and see and someone that violently hits the piece of art with a brush for no goddamn reason other than making monetas. no skills needed whatsoever. you could basically "paint" that shit beforehand and then think about ANY reason why you did it and it would still fit as its only a random piece of crap 😂. you cant see how much thought process is in there. you can say its art but to me sth you need to explain isnt art. simple as that 😂

    • @kuwachi8241
      @kuwachi8241 3 ปีที่แล้ว +20

      @@peniskopf653 True that. But from what I've seen in the video, they only sell the bad ones for such uh unreasonable price. I feel like those good abstract arts just went to waste 😔👊

    • @shivam-aggarwal
      @shivam-aggarwal 3 ปีที่แล้ว

      @@kuwachi8241 Chuck Close?

    • @MisKristalful
      @MisKristalful 3 ปีที่แล้ว +14

      One of the reasons was "because an artist is dead", which is stupid anyway

  • @BAlexanderProduction
    @BAlexanderProduction 4 ปีที่แล้ว +5175

    I really wish I would’ve kept the masterpieces I did in kindergarten. 😔

    • @Equa11ysurl
      @Equa11ysurl 4 ปีที่แล้ว +267

      I bet someone would be like "OMG THIS IS THE BEST ART EVEN THOUGH ITS JUST SCRIBBLES ITS WORTH 70,000,000"

    • @RaiComrade
      @RaiComrade 4 ปีที่แล้ว +92

      yeaa i hope so too, as they say "the art represent a history in it", kindergartner literally have the most history (imagination) its a looooooot wider

    • @nsr5961
      @nsr5961 4 ปีที่แล้ว +87

      A G your teacher probably kept your scribbles and she’s now a millionaire..

    • @ame8370
      @ame8370 4 ปีที่แล้ว +26

      This comment is gold😂

    • @bruh-cz4ge
      @bruh-cz4ge 4 ปีที่แล้ว +13

      @@nsr5961 stonks

  • @saepudin_A_Z
    @saepudin_A_Z ปีที่แล้ว +9

    Short answer on why these things get so expensive
    *MONEY LAUNDERING*

  • @GOATaro_
    @GOATaro_ 3 ปีที่แล้ว +8371

    Abstract art is the “I’m not like the other girls” of the art world.

    • @the_Pleiades
      @the_Pleiades 3 ปีที่แล้ว +257

      And there are two types of contemporary art
      .
      Jojo or money laundering
      .

    • @ZenitsuKunn
      @ZenitsuKunn 3 ปีที่แล้ว +60

      I never seen 2 pretty best friends,,, one of them gotta be ugly

    • @jasonroblero5684
      @jasonroblero5684 3 ปีที่แล้ว +9

      I love this comment

    • @mk-ki4ls
      @mk-ki4ls 3 ปีที่แล้ว +19

      Abstract: Don't *call me out*

    • @MrWeebs-gc2jj
      @MrWeebs-gc2jj 3 ปีที่แล้ว +10

      Jotaro!!!

  • @capedbaldy6404
    @capedbaldy6404 3 ปีที่แล้ว +1206

    “Art isn’t about beauty, it never really was”
    Definition of art:
    the expression or application of human creative skill and imagination, producing works to be appreciated primarily for their beauty or emotional power.
    Explain this then

    • @yuturtuyieie5544
      @yuturtuyieie5544 3 ปีที่แล้ว +134

      There it is: "emotional power", which is not the same thing as beauty.
      Not defending shitty paintings, just saying she's half right on this one.

    • @mrowkojadmeduza
      @mrowkojadmeduza 3 ปีที่แล้ว +49

      Because there's only one definition of "art", sure. 🤦‍♀️

    • @yuturtuyieie5544
      @yuturtuyieie5544 3 ปีที่แล้ว +13

      @S a) in Caped Baldy's definition, which I responded to, there's the expression "beauty or emotional power". The word "or" implies the validity and independence of both concepts: they are not two conditions which should be met, but two different possibilites art can explore.
      b) This definition of art is arbitrary, as most are, but at least the concept of "emotional power" encompasses more stuff that is commonly called art. An example would be movies like "Incendies" or "No Country for Old Man". They are incredible, gut wrenching movies. Yet they're not exactly "beautiful", but they do carry emotional power.
      Of course, it all depends on how you define beauty in the first place.

    • @m234476ghhma
      @m234476ghhma 3 ปีที่แล้ว +5

      @@yuturtuyieie5544 I'm trying to understand how to associate what you said to the reason someone calls a plain black Square art, *and* make me want to pay for it
      Whether is art or not, i don't know, but if is something worth buying? In my opinion, no.

    • @yuturtuyieie5544
      @yuturtuyieie5544 3 ปีที่แล้ว +6

      @@m234476ghhma You shouldn't buy it. To me, the likes of Malevich or Pollock are amusing, but I wound't pay millions, not even thousands for their work.
      The reason why these paintings are so expensive is simple: speculation and money laundering.
      With that said, there are plenty of contemporary artists which create really astounding art, like Theo Jansen, Ron Mueck, even Ai Wei Wei deserves a lot of merit for his crazy ideas. Is just that money is not a good metric of quality, or of its absence.
      My original point was just that I agree art is more than beauty, NOT that people should pay millions of dollars for lackluster works or concepts.

  • @zixianyong1995
    @zixianyong1995 4 ปีที่แล้ว +5185

    Money laundering and people who are able to hallucinate random stories from simple daily products

    • @MrDelvoye
      @MrDelvoye 4 ปีที่แล้ว +104

      you mean monet laundering...hhh

    • @arnonmaks
      @arnonmaks 4 ปีที่แล้ว +3

      Indeed

    • @veretxnerd983
      @veretxnerd983 4 ปีที่แล้ว +4

      Yes thank u

    • @irwin770
      @irwin770 4 ปีที่แล้ว

      Yep well described

    • @0regret-l2s
      @0regret-l2s 4 ปีที่แล้ว

      You can do it with non moder art too

  • @holyswordsman8568
    @holyswordsman8568 ปีที่แล้ว +15

    Love the part where they explained why modern art is so expensive

  • @soumyaranjan4626
    @soumyaranjan4626 4 ปีที่แล้ว +2658

    As an artist I feel so hurt. We spend hours upon hours working on a piece, trying our level best to create a beautiful artwork that people would look at with awe and wonder, then there are these fake ass imposters who shit all over a canvas and have the audacity to call it art n say things like art isn't about beauty. Don't give me bs.
    People like these and the ones who buy their 2 cents worth shits are the reason why real artists are struggling today.

    • @ayeshaartacademy3818
      @ayeshaartacademy3818 4 ปีที่แล้ว +58

      saaaaammmeee here

    • @theroadtocosplayandcomicco5840
      @theroadtocosplayandcomicco5840 4 ปีที่แล้ว +31

      Same I just changed my minor to art. I decided to change for reasons
      1. I needed an outlet to channel my strees and emotions to
      2. I love hands on skills
      3. I love painting sure my paintings take at least 4 to 5 hours but with each new painting I get better
      4. An excuse to buy all the paints and canvases and materials I want

    • @tomk318
      @tomk318 4 ปีที่แล้ว +143

      Art is about expression and not only about beauty - an expression of pain may not be beautiful but it is art. But, that said, modern art is mostly nonsense foisted on us for complicated, evil reasons. It is highly priced because it is used for money laundering,

    • @thisisfine4093
      @thisisfine4093 4 ปีที่แล้ว +18

      Tom K I love your explanation

    • @procreateeasy804
      @procreateeasy804 4 ปีที่แล้ว +22

      REALISM TAKES 1000% MORE TIME AND I WOULD KNOW! ITS JUST STUPID

  • @Ryan_McGee
    @Ryan_McGee ปีที่แล้ว +2019

    I remember watching a news report many years ago where they took paintings made by elementary school students and put them in art galleries. It was hilarious to watch the "experts and critics" comment on how much depth, talent, skilled, etc, the artists were.

    • @jonathanmosher72
      @jonathanmosher72 ปีที่แล้ว +165

      Most skilled artist suck at modern abstract art. Children can make awesome art. There's artists like Twombly who got their inspiration from children, but added composition, color, and balance. All I see on here are people who have Dunning Kruger that don't know anything about what they're talking about.

    • @su2spinors
      @su2spinors ปีที่แล้ว +63

      @@jonathanmosher72 or maybe being an artist isn’t that impressive like being a scientist or other witty professions and some artists have a sunken cost fallacy.

    • @jonathanmosher72
      @jonathanmosher72 ปีที่แล้ว +15

      @@su2spinors There's no record of what the OP said ever happening. You can tell someone who understand weight, composition, color, and balance, vs an average elementary school student. Most great modern artists went through college making classical art. Much of modern art is an idea of art as invention.

    • @dianeyap6445
      @dianeyap6445 ปีที่แล้ว +42

      this dont consider as an art. such a dumb idea anyone could say this is an art worth of million dollars. such a shame to those people who work for hours days weeks and even months to finish their ART works meanwhile this kind of so called 'art' feels like elementary days and they called it "very difficult" for what? lmao everyone could do that even a 2yrsold could. glad many people wide awake to not consider those frames with dirty paints as an art. lol

    • @su2spinors
      @su2spinors ปีที่แล้ว +11

      @@jonathanmosher72 nobody is saying we need only classical art. But if you need to sort of make ad hominem to the audience to justify the price tag, perhaps its not innovative and more pretentious. We aren’t really angry, we are just saying meh, and perhaps a bit concerned about money laundering to evade taxes.
      I just personally think in today’s world where scientists or physicists have tapped into fundamentals of our very existence, is creating things that are borderline magical, a lot of continental philosophers/artist feel rather inadequate and not that innovative and that leads to these pretentious things.
      “Look we are also really abstract just like math people are! Praise be upon my intellect!”
      Comes across pretty self aggrandizing which rest of the population finds silly.
      Modern art isn’t abomination nor is it end of civ or something. It’s just silly insecure people doing silly things.

  • @arushisarmah4592
    @arushisarmah4592 3 ปีที่แล้ว +682

    Most of us are mad because if we do the same thing it's called trash. But if someone with a fancy name does it, it's considered art

    • @roboyollumnanddrodo1419
      @roboyollumnanddrodo1419 3 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      Maybe

    • @celesteinfantino1409
      @celesteinfantino1409 3 ปีที่แล้ว +74

      I'm mad because it's a front for money laundering. 150$ in materials suddenly equals 9 million?

    • @knoweverything9075
      @knoweverything9075 3 ปีที่แล้ว

      No offense but pretty much how people idolizing Picasso's lastest art.
      I mean there are some of his *old* arts that definitely worth. But now.. I failed to understand the meaning behind it.

    • @rafliarrasyd5753
      @rafliarrasyd5753 3 ปีที่แล้ว +5

      If some painter got a name called le cock sucker I'd buy a painting from him

    • @Anonymous-376
      @Anonymous-376 3 ปีที่แล้ว +2

      Depends on what you look in for art. Art is communication, and the less specific a painting is (like abstract), the more meanings people can give it. Although it is true that it costs a lot of money simply because of money laundering. If you just want to see something pretty, then abstract is usually awful

  • @newdrug1880
    @newdrug1880 2 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

    The problem with this is that its virtually impossible to decifer if a painting has a message or is just predatory advantage taking of the audience by the artist.

  • @owlfie4833
    @owlfie4833 2 ปีที่แล้ว +3646

    It would be interesting to see an experiment done involving a modern artist’s work vs. 3 random passersby instructed to imitate said artist’s work, and see whether a room full of social elites are able to differentiate the authentic one full of “meaning”. I reckon everyone would just start bidding on the spot.

    • @king_charles
      @king_charles 2 ปีที่แล้ว +33

      yes

    • @cristo_crosta_gesu2910
      @cristo_crosta_gesu2910 2 ปีที่แล้ว +234

      *I would pay someone to make a video like this*

    • @girthBrookssss
      @girthBrookssss 2 ปีที่แล้ว +81

      genius... better do this before someone beats u to it... modern artists have the mentality of 'yeah anyone CAN do this but im the one that DID'

    • @Jojosiwo
      @Jojosiwo 2 ปีที่แล้ว +94

      Someone left glasses in the floor of art gallery on purpose...and many people thought it was a artist who left it...
      It was just some random person ..who wanted to see others reaction..

    • @MOJSTER99
      @MOJSTER99 2 ปีที่แล้ว +39

      @@Jojosiwo so it Was art, and that person WAS an artist making a statement that succeded beautifully.

  • @frigid_monarch
    @frigid_monarch 3 ปีที่แล้ว +1584

    _splashes paint on canvas_
    _sells it for 100 million_
    "Why would we buy this?"
    "It represents society and life"
    _sold_

    • @davidnoel1665
      @davidnoel1665 2 ปีที่แล้ว +132

      *piss on canvas*
      "Some dumbass will definitely buy this for 1 billion dollars"

    • @catassistant
      @catassistant 2 ปีที่แล้ว +36

      Someone could probably get stickers from a store, paint them random colors, then stick it on a canvas and have enough to retire and live a happy life

    • @jaspherjamesdolendo_mms-kitka
      @jaspherjamesdolendo_mms-kitka 2 ปีที่แล้ว +24

      And yet hitlers art is considered a bad art.

    • @tweetytinglesasmr3420
      @tweetytinglesasmr3420 2 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      Sounds fair to me

    • @flamixin
      @flamixin 2 ปีที่แล้ว +3

      For me: splash paint by my self.
      sell it for 99 Million to myself.
      instant profit

  • @Olav3D
    @Olav3D 4 ปีที่แล้ว +482

    "Art isn't about beauty." Modern art in a nutshell, ugly.

    • @robertospina6429
      @robertospina6429 4 ปีที่แล้ว +20

      @Marcus Dietachmair yes

    • @_timothy_tomato_9801
      @_timothy_tomato_9801 4 ปีที่แล้ว +23

      the whole point of art for buyers is to hang on your wall. people want beautiful things to look at, like flowers or a portrait- not a stupid black square. if you’re selling art I think it would help an awful lot to paint something beautiful

    • @luisgutierrez8047
      @luisgutierrez8047 4 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      .....their complete argument is that "it's about evoking a responce". Even back in the day when religious art dominated. The purpose was not to show how beautiful jesus or the virgin Mary were but how holy they were. Them being beautiful was just a means to convey that

    • @swarnavasengupta69
      @swarnavasengupta69 4 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      @Marcus Dietachmair what is a black square supposed to make you feel? Not racist maybe?

    • @swarnavasengupta69
      @swarnavasengupta69 4 ปีที่แล้ว +2

      @Marcus Dietachmair well, maybe those people could set their wallpaper as a black square maybe and not spend millions? Mate grow up, it's about tax evasion

  • @telle140
    @telle140 ปีที่แล้ว +8

    Art can’t be recreated even by the same artist. And even if it is recreated it’s merely just another creation. All art is one of a kind❤️

    • @rcartoons3941
      @rcartoons3941 ปีที่แล้ว +19

      I shat 3 days worth of food by holding it in. The canvas was all brown and stuff. I call it “Le merde”

    • @davidap257
      @davidap257 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      Andy Warhol recreated his own art, Modern art is crap.

  • @darshansibakoti8474
    @darshansibakoti8474 3 ปีที่แล้ว +1038

    The back of my Notebook has more personality than these.

    • @marguskiis7711
      @marguskiis7711 3 ปีที่แล้ว +5

      You don't have any notebook actually.

    • @chimkennubbets6899
      @chimkennubbets6899 3 ปีที่แล้ว +89

      @@marguskiis7711 don’t think you’re being cool with this shitty attitude of yours, just leave if you’re that annoyed. And stop coming at random people for no reason.

    • @saharrareyes3999
      @saharrareyes3999 3 ปีที่แล้ว +4

      So do I. 😆

    • @darshansibakoti8474
      @darshansibakoti8474 3 ปีที่แล้ว +33

      @Olivier Merheb My God! How could a peasant like me understand what you said? You must be using language of the gods. Like come on dude, seriously?

    • @luis9639
      @luis9639 3 ปีที่แล้ว +16

      @Olivier Merheb 99% of modern artists are gonna be forgotten anyway

  • @chloerabbitheart3129
    @chloerabbitheart3129 2 ปีที่แล้ว +1211

    What normies see: shitty art
    What rich people see: tax evasion

    • @kimfromnorthkorea
      @kimfromnorthkorea 2 ปีที่แล้ว +27

      What normies see: a worthless digital coin - seems like a great idea to dump my life savings into it.
      What rich people see: the normies are going crazy for worthless digital coins, let's make some money off those morons.

    • @imnonene
      @imnonene 2 ปีที่แล้ว +23

      Tax evasion and money laundering

    • @kevinduliesco5468
      @kevinduliesco5468 2 ปีที่แล้ว

      @@kimfromnorthkorea very real

    • @joeroeinski1107
      @joeroeinski1107 2 ปีที่แล้ว +2

      It’s not tax evasion, it’s avoiding piling taxes to begin with.

    • @danielawesome36
      @danielawesome36 2 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      @@joeroeinski1107 ...wait, so what's tax evation?

  • @ranuastika9847
    @ranuastika9847 3 ปีที่แล้ว +2145

    I mean like, i dont know about this kind of "art", but people need to appreciate more comics artist who literary draw and thinking about their comic story.

    • @AA-vr8ve
      @AA-vr8ve 3 ปีที่แล้ว +88

      Ikr?? The composition that goes into comics needs to be appreciated

    • @ZoZo-fh6tq
      @ZoZo-fh6tq 3 ปีที่แล้ว +40

      modern comic art is literally shit tho with a few exceptions
      manga art is better

    • @AA-vr8ve
      @AA-vr8ve 3 ปีที่แล้ว +9

      @@ZoZo-fh6tq what do you mean?

    • @ZoZo-fh6tq
      @ZoZo-fh6tq 3 ปีที่แล้ว +3

      @@AA-vr8ve u said that comic art and the effort that goes into it should be appreciated but most of them suck balls

    • @AA-vr8ve
      @AA-vr8ve 3 ปีที่แล้ว +20

      @@ZoZo-fh6tq i wouldn't say that but they have to churn out piece after piece of art that tells a story

  • @GreatMewtwo
    @GreatMewtwo 2 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    Modern art isn't about how much training you have, who you worked with, your brush work, your message, or how well your colors are done. It's about all the galleries and dealers you paid along the way.

  • @ManvendraSK
    @ManvendraSK 3 ปีที่แล้ว +5009

    DaVinci would have died again seeing this kind of art.

    • @Anchoviy
      @Anchoviy 3 ปีที่แล้ว +61

      Indeed

    • @spartanstark8908
      @spartanstark8908 3 ปีที่แล้ว +92

      Angelo too.

    • @mrunknon
      @mrunknon 3 ปีที่แล้ว +72

      Artist does not make painting for sell
      But the painting has value as others want to buy

    • @chrissebastian7330
      @chrissebastian7330 3 ปีที่แล้ว +11

      Thats 100% true

    • @_K_i_w_i_
      @_K_i_w_i_ 3 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      Agree

  • @yungchangsta
    @yungchangsta 4 ปีที่แล้ว +708

    Imagine going to art school, studying and practicing hard to be the next Leonardo Da Vinci. Then imagine making a painting you put your heart and soul into it for 46 years, only to be bested by some squiggles because some dude had a heart attack and the “artist” stole it.

    • @midori6913
      @midori6913 4 ปีที่แล้ว +2

      lil memeio LMAO

    • @BlueBaeChai
      @BlueBaeChai 4 ปีที่แล้ว

      Honestly

    • @misterant910
      @misterant910 4 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      I am an art student at Paris's beaux arts and i knw lot of teachers who lived this

    • @Pascal5207_
      @Pascal5207_ 3 ปีที่แล้ว

      Your not an artist I’m guessing.

    • @yungchangsta
      @yungchangsta 3 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      @@Pascal5207_ boo hoo you posers who love those squiggly lines are not even artists

  • @danzho6442
    @danzho6442 3 ปีที่แล้ว +1349

    Whats sad is there are actual artist with amazing talent being overshadowed by these 10 minute "abstract" paintings

    • @anthonyisquirky3510
      @anthonyisquirky3510 3 ปีที่แล้ว +13

      what does it mean to be a talented artist?

    • @LS-qt9bo
      @LS-qt9bo 3 ปีที่แล้ว +61

      @@anthonyisquirky3510 you are good at art

    • @aphnisfallon2746
      @aphnisfallon2746 3 ปีที่แล้ว +81

      @@anthonyisquirky3510making an actual art

    • @traveler678
      @traveler678 3 ปีที่แล้ว +20

      @@anthonyisquirky3510 you would be interested in art and be able to feel thing when you look at a artwork

    • @Caspr818
      @Caspr818 3 ปีที่แล้ว +52

      @@anthonyisquirky3510 be creative, put effort in your work, be original and most importantly be patient with your art.

  • @KokoMcMonkey
    @KokoMcMonkey 10 หลายเดือนก่อน +3

    There are countless stories of ‘installation art’ being thrown out by the cleaning staff at museums who mistook it for the garbage it was. If something can’t stand on it’s own merit, without explanation as to why it should be appreciated or admired, it doesn’t deserve to be called ‘art’.

  • @mftripz8445
    @mftripz8445 3 ปีที่แล้ว +685

    The reason why rich people “buy” shitty art for so much, isn’t because of the uniqueness or the art itself, it’s actually donations to the artist so the rich man can avoid paying taxes (if you donate a certain percentage of your total income you are exempt from income tax, this certain percentage is cheaper then what Uncle Sam would have robbed you for)

    • @falafel.waffle8630
      @falafel.waffle8630 3 ปีที่แล้ว +40

      thank you for explaining, I didn't know this

    • @Jasondurgen
      @Jasondurgen 3 ปีที่แล้ว +32

      That and money laundering and being unnecessarily frivolous with spending

    • @bigvee401
      @bigvee401 3 ปีที่แล้ว +2

      that makes a lot of bro

    • @veryconfused9768
      @veryconfused9768 3 ปีที่แล้ว +4

      Ah now that makes sense.Rich ppl obviously can't be dumb so that's what is happening.Then why is government allowing it? Sorry I am a bit stupid.

    • @NevermindThee
      @NevermindThee 3 ปีที่แล้ว +8

      @@veryconfused9768 Because politicians profit from it, too.

  • @Ahmad.....................
    @Ahmad..................... 3 ปีที่แล้ว +616

    My theory: after what happened with hitler, art schools started accepting anything and everything in order to avoid another world war

  • @Юлиус-п6ц
    @Юлиус-п6ц 3 ปีที่แล้ว +2874

    "Only two things are infinite, the universe and human stupidity" - Albert Einstein

    • @pranjalsingh3998
      @pranjalsingh3998 3 ปีที่แล้ว +92

      "And I'm not sure about the universe"

    • @scares3859
      @scares3859 3 ปีที่แล้ว +15

      entropy of universe and human stupidity = ♾

    • @clarkalarcon4057
      @clarkalarcon4057 2 ปีที่แล้ว +2

      I love your pfp

    • @ilsuocavallopazzo
      @ilsuocavallopazzo 2 ปีที่แล้ว +5

      Both are impermanent... but there are somthing infinite; when we stop being stupid we will know.

    • @Niilo2.2
      @Niilo2.2 2 ปีที่แล้ว

      @@ilsuocavallopazzo so you realize it was a joke?

  • @michaeloneill6524
    @michaeloneill6524 11 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

    I paint for my self, i build my own frames and my home is my gallery. I dont feel like sellling or showing anything, they bring me joy. My wife loves them so they will never be sold. So with each painting my happiness grows.

    • @Kevin-qo6qt
      @Kevin-qo6qt 17 วันที่ผ่านมา

      Pretty much the same here

  • @nikgeniuses6856
    @nikgeniuses6856 4 ปีที่แล้ว +750

    My opinion about some of these Modern art, in a nutshell;
    Is it Art? Yes, it is.
    Is it Good Art? No, it is not.
    Art is subjective, beauty is too, but I for one am unable to see the beauty of a canvas with a black painted box on it. I don't think that the experience of a painter makes up for it either. It's not fair to look at the box and say "It's amazing!" just because the artist is well known, while artists with genuine beauty are left struggling.

    • @Burak-rv8ev
      @Burak-rv8ev 4 ปีที่แล้ว +29

      same. sure everything is art, but not everything is good art. and definitely not every art is worth 459438 billions of dollars. if art is so expensive why pay it for the crap and completely ignore the works that has been worked on with intense actual labour?

    • @WhenAllTheWarmthLeavesUs
      @WhenAllTheWarmthLeavesUs 4 ปีที่แล้ว +3

      Beauty is objective.

    • @ethansblue3studioscreat134
      @ethansblue3studioscreat134 4 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      so TRUE... 😅🤔😭😭😭

    • @aharrypotterfan5951
      @aharrypotterfan5951 4 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      empty . com yeah, they said that.

    • @Mica_T
      @Mica_T 4 ปีที่แล้ว +4

      So you're telling me artists like Van Gogh, Monet, Manet, Munch... produce "not good" art? Because they're are extension of the modernist category as Expressionism and Impressionism are often categorised under "Modern". Please use the terms carefully. What you dislike is Minimalist art. Not Modern art.

  • @shadoninja
    @shadoninja 4 ปีที่แล้ว +463

    Who else found this video to be completely unconvincing?

    • @samchen9951
      @samchen9951 4 ปีที่แล้ว +34

      I found this video to be entirely bs

    • @anonx111
      @anonx111 4 ปีที่แล้ว +20

      Sam Chen Yeah its clearly so shady people can clean their dirty money

    • @arcanalumina3276
      @arcanalumina3276 4 ปีที่แล้ว +3

      This makes me think that when I go dump, I should put it on the canvas and call it "art" and nobody should fight me over it.
      Poop on the canvas = Million dollar art.
      It has a story. Periodt.

    • @noobgamer-cq1wm
      @noobgamer-cq1wm 4 ปีที่แล้ว +2

      Preaching that we are bullshitting everyone else.

  • @josephmcc234dy3
    @josephmcc234dy3 3 ปีที่แล้ว +2735

    “It’s not easy being an artist in London”
    ....paints messy circle.

    • @prancerjohnponce6889
      @prancerjohnponce6889 3 ปีที่แล้ว +41

      what he said is true if you are trash like him.

    • @user-hg2qi8bl2f
      @user-hg2qi8bl2f 3 ปีที่แล้ว +30

      *Woah* that must be 5 million dollars!

    • @laurocoman
      @laurocoman 3 ปีที่แล้ว +15

      He fave up and started painting with his fingers

    • @veryconfused9768
      @veryconfused9768 3 ปีที่แล้ว +19

      I watched him without blinking and dude was doing what my little niece does.i didn't any artistic or smthn.like he was just going randomly

    • @ape2533
      @ape2533 3 ปีที่แล้ว +7

      It’s true because there are like 500000 artists in london and only 20 are succesful

  • @mmuti7800
    @mmuti7800 ปีที่แล้ว +6

    i thought my comment on this topic would make me seem uncultured and uncivilised but its good to see that the comment section is filled with comments from people that have common sense !

  • @jortand
    @jortand 4 ปีที่แล้ว +2694

    *sneezes* at a canvas
    Money launderers: I will pay 20 million!

    • @joevilla4126
      @joevilla4126 4 ปีที่แล้ว +27

      Money launderers: (art dealers, sellers, agents etc) how much is my cut?

    • @pablovaldes2810
      @pablovaldes2810 4 ปีที่แล้ว +38

      hobo eats paint and shits on canvas "dies" painting valued at 420 million

    • @dmitrixallo7072
      @dmitrixallo7072 4 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      How exactly would someone launder money from this?

    • @SpottedCat.
      @SpottedCat. 4 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      Just made my day 🤣

    • @KingofHearts
      @KingofHearts 4 ปีที่แล้ว +4

      Dmitri Xallo two ways. One by using it as a vehicle to move mass amounts of money back and forth. Two, using losses, transfers or donations as a means of tax deductions.

  • @xeax-r5l
    @xeax-r5l 2 ปีที่แล้ว +953

    Tbh modern art is just about class. I can literally drop a few paint buckets on a canvas and if it’s auctioned in a room full of rich people, someone will buy it for a million dollars. Rich people just want to show off to each other that they can spend that much. But if that same art piece is auctioned in a room full of poor people, someone might buy it for 1 dollar. So the true value of modern art is actually dependent on the audience it’s being auctioned to. That’s literally it. Nothing else matters.

    • @IoannisSkepetzakis
      @IoannisSkepetzakis ปีที่แล้ว +61

      Picasso once said that, It took me four years to paint like Raphael but a lifetime to paint like a child

    • @jonathanmosher72
      @jonathanmosher72 ปีที่แล้ว +9

      Nope, maybe 130 years ago you could get away with that. Than again 130 years ago you'd go through traditional art school and do that because you're trying to make a point.

    • @honestartworks
      @honestartworks ปีที่แล้ว +12

      You nailed it..

    • @jonathanmosher72
      @jonathanmosher72 ปีที่แล้ว

      You people are Dunning-Kruger and don't understand any of this. Go back 100 years and start doing modern art. If you want to be a relevant artist start by doing something new... should be easy moron. Go do it, make your millions...

    • @djsauchan5727
      @djsauchan5727 ปีที่แล้ว +24

      Some likely money laundering

  • @aayansifayet7792
    @aayansifayet7792 3 ปีที่แล้ว +1257

    When the woman said, 'Art was never about beauty, it never has been.' really pissed me off.

    • @liannamkoyan9893
      @liannamkoyan9893 3 ปีที่แล้ว +44

      i mean, it never was. In some way yes, but artists didn’t show only beautiful things.

    • @oapeleftherotisaftistisepo9540
      @oapeleftherotisaftistisepo9540 3 ปีที่แล้ว +71

      @@liannamkoyan9893 it was and still is. It's Not just about beauty if that's what you're saying.

    • @rrrrrfffff
      @rrrrrfffff 3 ปีที่แล้ว +24

      @@flinbin I think what Aayan Abu Sifayet is getting at is not about beauty in the way we normally think, but how we perceive art on an emotional and visual level - that art should be about how it looks and feels, not about if it's "rare" or "valuable" which was the point of the quote from the video

    • @oapeleftherotisaftistisepo9540
      @oapeleftherotisaftistisepo9540 3 ปีที่แล้ว +57

      @@flinbin Beauty doesn't necessarily mean actual beautiful stuff, the ugly and dark at still has to have some kind of beauty to it. Even "Saturn devouring his son" is beautiful art. So you could agree on that.

    • @oapeleftherotisaftistisepo9540
      @oapeleftherotisaftistisepo9540 3 ปีที่แล้ว +7

      @@flinbin And don't even get me started on some of the really terrifying biblical renderings, yet beautiful, look up biblically accurate Angels.

  • @alphabetagamma4142
    @alphabetagamma4142 11 หลายเดือนก่อน +3

    As a lifelong artist and someone who has studied the contemporary art market in depth, I am convinced that it is complete bullshit.
    If I had to sum up my conclusions, I would say this: Owning contemporary art is the modern equivalent of medieval lords having lawns. It doesn't have any inherent value. It doesn't serve a purpose. It is simply a means of showing off how much wealth you can essentially "waste".

  • @sarafx1995
    @sarafx1995 4 ปีที่แล้ว +2586

    Even the way they paint makes me cringe, it's like they don't even care. Just smearing paint all over

    • @BOOMBoom-tv4kv
      @BOOMBoom-tv4kv 4 ปีที่แล้ว +142

      I'd rather buy a fan art of a certain fandom cause at least they look nice than... this

    • @Shawn-md2lr
      @Shawn-md2lr 4 ปีที่แล้ว +72

      Right! Even a toddler could do it who is in diapers. smearing paint all over it.

    • @EvilLaughter16
      @EvilLaughter16 4 ปีที่แล้ว +55

      @@Shawn-md2lr lol i found some painting i did on art school when i was 6 now after 18 years. I though i'll just keep them as memory...find this video...my brain...we are rich!

    • @ruki4577
      @ruki4577 4 ปีที่แล้ว +69

      thank you. I am so so careful with my strokes, I do everything with love and caution. seeing people violently rub brushes on a canvas makes me incredibly uncomfortable

    • @deoon7525
      @deoon7525 4 ปีที่แล้ว +23

      Because thats how they show their expressions through how they paint

  • @michaelmodernsonicfan5341
    @michaelmodernsonicfan5341 4 ปีที่แล้ว +1638

    My older brother: goes to art college
    Also my older brother: modern art is trash

    • @ghostie7776
      @ghostie7776 4 ปีที่แล้ว +95

      Me: is a pretty skilled artist
      Also me: this is bs

    • @ghostie7776
      @ghostie7776 4 ปีที่แล้ว +21

      @gheddi i post pretty simple artwork on my yt channel since recording is painful, i have to stack a bunch of books and put my phone on them, and then wait a MILLION years to export the video on my phone. Plus Thats one of my older videos, and i can tell you, I've gotten much better at art. Im planing on editing on my pc now since Its easier.

    • @thatoneguy9822
      @thatoneguy9822 4 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      @@ghostie7776 Yoooo, a fellow Balkan person. Šta ima?

    • @ghostie7776
      @ghostie7776 4 ปีที่แล้ว

      @@thatoneguy9822 e ćao

    • @robcatgg8014
      @robcatgg8014 4 ปีที่แล้ว +4

      @gheddi damn why so mean 🤣

  • @kirtisdrawing3034
    @kirtisdrawing3034 3 ปีที่แล้ว +1257

    Wow! So my years of practicing anatomy, shading, lighting, design, perspective, coloring and environments fundamentals are just a waste, all i need is to buy paint platter and paint random shapes on a canvas and i would be a billionaire.

    • @marguskiis7711
      @marguskiis7711 3 ปีที่แล้ว +9

      You never learned it. So, just go away.

    • @chimkennubbets6899
      @chimkennubbets6899 3 ปีที่แล้ว +161

      @@marguskiis7711 I bet you can’t even draw a line straight, so YOU go away :)

    • @chimkennubbets6899
      @chimkennubbets6899 3 ปีที่แล้ว +116

      @@marguskiis7711 well if you are, you don’t gotta be so self-centred and think you’re the best- Cuz your attitude is def not.

    • @marguskiis7711
      @marguskiis7711 3 ปีที่แล้ว +16

      @@chimkennubbets6899 everyone who has studied art never talk such a crap about art history. All the educated artists understand modern art, all the logic.

    • @chimkennubbets6899
      @chimkennubbets6899 3 ปีที่แล้ว +92

      @@marguskiis7711 I’m sorry but like when did this person talk about “art history”?? They just meant to say that they learned art and it has all gone to waste cuz of the “modern art standards”

  • @marilepine1
    @marilepine1 ปีที่แล้ว +2

    The truth is that most artists starve. Most of the comments say artists are scammers but 90% of them work really hard and don't get any money for their art. I'm an artist myself, I work hard and don't sell anything. Works only sell for millions after the artist is dead. So stop saying it's a scam, art don't do you any harm, on the contrary.

  • @rattyrat.
    @rattyrat. 3 ปีที่แล้ว +440

    never did i look at a piece of modern art and say “wow so much painstaking work must have been put into this art and it’s definitely worth the over 10 million dollars it costed”

    • @rattyrat.
      @rattyrat. 3 ปีที่แล้ว +60

      @Olivier Merheb I guess you are the same too, judging someone to be narrow minded solely based on one sentence.

    • @mhdfrb9971
      @mhdfrb9971 3 ปีที่แล้ว +43

      @Olivier Merheb aww modern shit art lover mad 😂

    • @minimumsolow.7535
      @minimumsolow.7535 3 ปีที่แล้ว +4

      @Olivier Merheb I mean, I agree with golden, but realistic painters and other more representational artists do have a lot more effort to put in in things like design perspective, and proportions, they have to get things to look right, while modern artists are more free. I prefer limited mediums tbh, they encourage more creativity, you'd have to find clever solutions to get around things or need to face challenges, and that satisfaction when you solve a challenge is simply delightful.

    • @jjkkmmmmjjib
      @jjkkmmmmjjib 2 ปีที่แล้ว

      @Olivier Merheb you are kinda right

    • @youtubedeletedmynamewhybother
      @youtubedeletedmynamewhybother 2 ปีที่แล้ว +12

      ​@Olivier Merheb I'm glad crazy people like you exist, it makes the rest of us feel a bit more normal.

  • @1948treetop
    @1948treetop 3 ปีที่แล้ว +206

    This is a true story, Many years ago there used to be a TV host who had a weekly show that held topics on current affairs. His name was Gilbert Harding. One week he decided to invite several (4) art critics to explain to his audience the concept of abstract art. He exhibited 4 works of art and ask each critic to explain the meaning of each piece of work. Each one, in turn, came out and gave their spiel on what the artists were trying to promote in each of the artwork. Which were in fact not too dissimilar to what Jackson Pollock produced when he was still around. Gilbert asked the critics to take a seat, and he would go into the back of the studio and bring out the artists, so they could congratulate them personally. Gilbert Harding came back on stage holding the hand of a chimpanzee. The audience response was priceless.

    • @kathryncarter6143
      @kathryncarter6143 3 ปีที่แล้ว +3

      Love it

    • @xplicitmike
      @xplicitmike 3 ปีที่แล้ว +13

      At the same time, that kind of proves the point and beauty of modern abstract art - it's all about how you personally perceive it, what emotional and chemical reactions each piece brings to you. It doesn't matter who painted it.

    • @covenawhite4855
      @covenawhite4855 3 ปีที่แล้ว +2

      Chimpanzee being trained to paint is a great accomplishment for both the trainer and Chimpanzee.

    • @iptg2673
      @iptg2673 3 ปีที่แล้ว

      do you have a link to it? i really want to watch it.

    • @joelstephenson8017
      @joelstephenson8017 3 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      Looooool

  • @JustinPiercee
    @JustinPiercee ปีที่แล้ว +2

    The idea that we should be highly rewarded for a small amount of effort has made its way into almost every aspect of life

  • @rushes74
    @rushes74 2 ปีที่แล้ว +1586

    My dad is an artist, since he was a kid he went through a lot, when I say a lot I mean it. He’s a brilliant artist, he works hard to sell his artworks and participates in exhibitions and galleries..etc , that breaks my heart, I really hate it when I see him up all night and working under pressure and not be able to sell anything.

    • @N_I_G_H_T--343
      @N_I_G_H_T--343 2 ปีที่แล้ว +19

      Yeah it's annoying to see ppl like that

    • @N_I_G_H_T--343
      @N_I_G_H_T--343 2 ปีที่แล้ว +77

      I just hate that somone can do a splat and sell it fo 1000000dollars like I can litterly do the same thing before if it was abstract I could see building the horizon or so thing but now I do not count this as art

    • @thibaudherbert3144
      @thibaudherbert3144 2 ปีที่แล้ว +14

      @@N_I_G_H_T--343 this is the game now you can cry or adapt sadly that's your only options

    • @N_I_G_H_T--343
      @N_I_G_H_T--343 2 ปีที่แล้ว +21

      @@thibaudherbert3144 yeah its so dumb

    • @미하우
      @미하우 2 ปีที่แล้ว +6

      We found Adolf jr.

  • @jaceyking5015
    @jaceyking5015 2 ปีที่แล้ว +2534

    I went to school for an art degree- traditional figurative stuff mainly. Love me some quality figure paintings. I had to take several art history classes for my degree, one of which was "20th Century Art." My professor split us up into groups the first day and gave us examples of Modern Art to discuss as a class and also discuss our opinions on Modern Art. I gave my honest opinion, that no matter how hard I try, when I look at Modern Art I feel nothing. It looks absolutely pointless to me. There was this rich older retired lady taking the class for giggles and to kill some time, and she got after me berating and belittling me for my opinion, and how I just didn't understand Modern Art, especially because I haven't traveled much (I don't have the money to travel). So she proceeded to tell me about a Jackson Pollock exhibit she went to in Rome one time. I guess there was one of his paintings that had a bee that had gotten stuck in the paint and died, and now its body is a permanent part of the painting. She said it was the "dichotomy of life and death." I just think it's really gross that it's an ugly painting with a dead bug stuck to it. But that's just me. I guess I'll never learn.

    • @sakurabrent1242
      @sakurabrent1242 2 ปีที่แล้ว +45

      🙌

    • @whyistherehandlesnow
      @whyistherehandlesnow 2 ปีที่แล้ว +417

      Nah your opinions are valid, and shared

    • @Ammeo
      @Ammeo 2 ปีที่แล้ว +248

      We live in a world where random lines on a canvas could cost millions

    • @jaynorthfield5581
      @jaynorthfield5581 2 ปีที่แล้ว +40

      She is a perfect example of the people with too much time and money that can stare at a couple lines and make up some bullshit to satisfy her pretentious mind.

    • @DescendDab
      @DescendDab 2 ปีที่แล้ว +164

      You were definitely not in the wrong, that disgusting woman was. How dare she berate your personal opinion (which also happens to be the less pretentious opinion)

  • @sliceofbread29yrago52
    @sliceofbread29yrago52 3 ปีที่แล้ว +510

    Buyer: "I connect with this piece of art, it touches me spiritually. It's almost as if me and this artwork are one"
    Artist: "All I did was smear my shit across the canvas"

    • @cyanscrewdriver2092
      @cyanscrewdriver2092 3 ปีที่แล้ว +4

      I bet fbreeze is illegal in his house

    • @tinajsews2835
      @tinajsews2835 3 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      Give your life to Jesus Christ , repent, pray and read your bible for your self it may be hard but its worth it ask God for understanding , and for him to guide you , give it all to him before its too late🙏❤ Repent , Jesus Christ is coming back, if you have any questions please ask me

    • @sarahscroggins2793
      @sarahscroggins2793 3 ปีที่แล้ว

      So funny...lol

    • @mgsgamer8340
      @mgsgamer8340 3 ปีที่แล้ว

      @@tinajsews2835
      Yassss preach for the emptiness of this buyer’s soul sis.
      PREACHHHHHHHH

    • @ink66
      @ink66 3 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      @@tinajsews2835 probably shouldn't bring up religion..

  • @FrancisHoward-l3p
    @FrancisHoward-l3p 7 หลายเดือนก่อน

    A portrait painting still has an edge over photography, as a painting can show how you wish to be represented; a camera shows what is actually there. Telling people what they want to hear can be a valuable skill.

  • @TripleMN
    @TripleMN 4 ปีที่แล้ว +313

    Man this means I was an artist in my early school days.

    • @Lunk42
      @Lunk42 4 ปีที่แล้ว +13

      Not even kidding when I say that I painted better stuff when I was in elementary school. Definitely not into that stuff now but I was at the very least decent compared to this garbage.

  • @lukekelchner5471
    @lukekelchner5471 3 ปีที่แล้ว +455

    *homeless man has diarrhea on a slab of concrete* art connoisseur- “The depth of this work is immeasurable. The pain in the brush strokes is beyond visceral and yet subtle. A true magnum opus.”

    • @stylesbyelkellc
      @stylesbyelkellc 3 ปีที่แล้ว +4

      Lmao!!!!!!

    • @popgumdrawjam7207
      @popgumdrawjam7207 3 ปีที่แล้ว +8

      The blending of the paint on the canvas is spectacular!

    • @owenb3567
      @owenb3567 3 ปีที่แล้ว +9

      “I love the colors, it truly brings the piece together.”

    • @ishitajariwala6829
      @ishitajariwala6829 3 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      lol

    • @ishitajariwala6829
      @ishitajariwala6829 3 ปีที่แล้ว +4

      But this is bs like people who make actual art like years of hard work are just being replaced by stupid dabs of paint over a white canvas and moreover they get millions of it

  • @andrewzhao444
    @andrewzhao444 4 ปีที่แล้ว +674

    "83% don't consider this to be art"
    "still divisive"
    doesn't sound that divisive to me.

    • @rrsharizam
      @rrsharizam 4 ปีที่แล้ว +18

      Anyone with more than 2 brain cells wouldn't consider that to be a piece of art.

    • @fatoeki
      @fatoeki 4 ปีที่แล้ว +3

      @@rrsharizam it's maybe the most controversial statement ever by one of the most well known artist. It was ment to ask the question of what art exactly is. It did exactly that, and does still. So yeah, one of the most important art pieces of the 20th century :)

    • @den427100840
      @den427100840 4 ปีที่แล้ว +2

      ​@@fatoeki art comes in different forms as u may know from sound like music or visual like movies or paintings .since painting is visual art i dont need the story behind what is meant for the artist nor his journey to paint it ,if u watch an universally bad movie with bad cuts or mediocre dialogue but u knew the director intentions or his struggle of shooting it will u like the movie more ? Im an amateur artist work mostly digitally doing some on fivrre i cant help but to think it is a joke played on realist artists . there was an experiment on 3 year old child they gave her paint brush and load of canvases ,then she got to work,and they rented a venue for her jumble. you can imagine how pretentious those art critic sound like some of them refused to make there face appear on the documentary after learning that the artist is 3 yo child . modern art in my opinion is a lazy art ,full of mishaps that should be corrected.

    • @midnightfun1277
      @midnightfun1277 4 ปีที่แล้ว +2

      Art culture is ruled by eccentric, snob people that thinks they know better thats why they are pulling away from mainstream so they could look like elites and cool.

  • @nekolyna033
    @nekolyna033 ปีที่แล้ว +2

    Art (drawing) is to deeply feel each stroke, color, and line. It depends on each perception and develops successfully according to the popularity/price of the painting.

  • @anilkanojiya1207
    @anilkanojiya1207 3 ปีที่แล้ว +3802

    If this is an art, then we all are perfect artist.

    • @यतोधर्मःततोजयः
      @यतोधर्मःततोजयः 2 ปีที่แล้ว +152

      My art teacher would beat ny ads if I draw a black square in my painting.

    • @PurpleOtakuBB
      @PurpleOtakuBB 2 ปีที่แล้ว +7

      Yes

    • @anuragyadav2086
      @anuragyadav2086 2 ปีที่แล้ว +4

      amen

    • @lian7092
      @lian7092 2 ปีที่แล้ว +33

      **If this is art , then we are all perfect artists** , No , nobody can be a perfect artist , because such does not exist , and nobody would give you the respect of an artist if you don't learn the basics first , anybody could draw a black square , but it wouldn't have a certain weight to it , it would be a meaningless art piece of bad taste

    • @14bqdonk
      @14bqdonk 2 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      yep

  • @jordigutierrez4161
    @jordigutierrez4161 3 ปีที่แล้ว +578

    This video could've literally just been 2 minutes of an accountant showing how u right off art on ur taxes.

    • @BELPHECROW
      @BELPHECROW 3 ปีที่แล้ว +10

      ayup

    • @swish153
      @swish153 3 ปีที่แล้ว +3

      EXACTLY

  • @partyfish3415
    @partyfish3415 3 ปีที่แล้ว +554

    The black square painting is the equivalent of revising draft after draft of an essay and then deleting all of it and submitting a blank Google doc. A+ work right there.

    • @gabeh1839
      @gabeh1839 3 ปีที่แล้ว +2

      Cringe

    • @ojaspathare2295
      @ojaspathare2295 3 ปีที่แล้ว +23

      @@gabeh1839 stfu

    • @ojaspathare2295
      @ojaspathare2295 3 ปีที่แล้ว +2

      😂😅

    • @an_38kitkashyap
      @an_38kitkashyap 3 ปีที่แล้ว +8

      @@gabeh1839 glad that you accepted it. You are truly cringe

    • @ravindrajahagirdar2701
      @ravindrajahagirdar2701 3 ปีที่แล้ว +3

      If you don't mind. The black square is philosophic, existentialist. It has everything you can imagine and at the same time nothing. Isn't that sufficient to make it great ?
      We go to a concert to hear the music they make,not to tell the artist what and how to play.

  • @memes_wikipedia
    @memes_wikipedia 2 หลายเดือนก่อน

    The reason why it costs so much is that the museum or the particular client paid that much for the art or requested a particular art from an artist. So, even if the artist don't do it seriously, the contract will never be stopped. Therefore the museum had no choice but to show it publicly and dictate how much it costs.

  • @hideinthemirror5306
    @hideinthemirror5306 3 ปีที่แล้ว +965

    Struggling artists who spent 20+ years practicing on their art but only makes less than $100 per artwork: are we a joke to you?

    • @rurathn5534
      @rurathn5534 3 ปีที่แล้ว +34

      Life is unfair

    • @user-fy1ef3dj6c
      @user-fy1ef3dj6c 3 ปีที่แล้ว +28

      @@rurathn5534 was and always will be

    • @lilia4113
      @lilia4113 3 ปีที่แล้ว +7

      Thats so sad...

    • @IShouldGoToSleep
      @IShouldGoToSleep 3 ปีที่แล้ว +10

      modern artists are also struggling artists, you think every artist is getting paid millions?

    • @samuraiboi2735
      @samuraiboi2735 3 ปีที่แล้ว

      Damn i hope art is alot better from now

  • @AMNG1994
    @AMNG1994 3 ปีที่แล้ว +1211

    "Art isn't about beauty."
    Statements like that make modern art even more preposterous than it already is.

    • @AA-vr8ve
      @AA-vr8ve 3 ปีที่แล้ว +13

      Some art is? Some art isn't

    • @vrath2423
      @vrath2423 3 ปีที่แล้ว +66

      @@AA-vr8ve if it's neither pretty nor meaningful then what's the point?

    • @AA-vr8ve
      @AA-vr8ve 3 ปีที่แล้ว +25

      @@vrath2423 i meant that art can be ugly looking if it's meaningful
      Like the spongebob close ups? Those look disgusting, and it's amazing.

    • @an_38kitkashyap
      @an_38kitkashyap 3 ปีที่แล้ว +9

      2:24 can actually be considered an art as it looks beautiful, although not the most complex stuff I've seen so far. But what in the name of seventh shit is the thing that comes after this?

    • @deeznuts-pf2lv
      @deeznuts-pf2lv 3 ปีที่แล้ว +12

      @@AA-vr8ve her argument was that artists don't feel the need to make beautiful paintings because now we have photography.. like wtf?

  • @loknezz3999
    @loknezz3999 3 ปีที่แล้ว +944

    Man, this piece is so deep. I wonder how the artist thought of such a thing.
    The artist: Crap, deadlines tomorrow. I think a square will work. Just say something that sounds deep and meaningful

    • @florencioalexandre7873
      @florencioalexandre7873 3 ปีที่แล้ว +66

      Crap, I need a good name if I want it to be famous...
      I know!
      "Untitled"
      ...
      Perfect masterpiece 👌

    • @WilfNelson1
      @WilfNelson1 3 ปีที่แล้ว +6

      @@florencioalexandre7873 tbh I paint for fun only and I have tons of stuff called untitled because legit how many different names for an abstract blob can you make? Untitled usually means 'i wasn't thinking in words when I did this so back off'

    • @florencioalexandre7873
      @florencioalexandre7873 3 ปีที่แล้ว +3

      @@WilfNelson1
      Yeah, I know... I was just being a smartass with a one liner joke...
      Sorry 😅
      But I 100% agree with you, and I personally like abstract paintings
      I think some pieces are "overrated", in the sense that the art market inflates their monetary value
      But besides that, for me every piece has an inherent value even if I personally don't like it/ the artist or understand it.
      I wish I could paint 🎨 abstract, instead of the random splashes and blobs of paint I call my creations 😬
      Anyway, thanks for the comment and take care 👋

    • @WilfNelson1
      @WilfNelson1 3 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      @@florencioalexandre7873 it's cool no hard feelings, I was also making fun of myself for just being lazy with naming. Tbh I'll also say that art is dead to me once it's done so I normally don't like naming things because at the point of naming I just want to move on

    • @shadowslayer4578
      @shadowslayer4578 3 ปีที่แล้ว

      @@florencioalexandre7873 or the unknown

  • @davidwilsonBC
    @davidwilsonBC 15 วันที่ผ่านมา +1

    So, modern art is so expensive because the price keeps going up. Thanks for that BI.

  • @alexmikhylov
    @alexmikhylov 4 ปีที่แล้ว +603

    I can understand the work of Malevich who spent the lifetime going to this simplification while starting in classic complex painting.
    I can not understand modern "modern" artists who start from childish drawings and stay at childish drawings. where is the journey here?

    • @alex1937
      @alex1937 4 ปีที่แล้ว +41

      Exactly! Art (I would think) is about branching out and exploring different mediums, most artists will stick to one primary medium because they have successfully skilled in it and love it but will still try other things. Sadly, a lot of people will stick to this modern art bs just to make quick fast-paced art for the money. I have a really difficult time understanding modern artists if all their work is a monochromatic painting...

    • @d3r4g45
      @d3r4g45 4 ปีที่แล้ว +18

      No one is paying millions to present day artists that do abstract shit.
      Malevich is priced because he is a historical figure, not because of what he did. Like gold. It is priced because we all agree it's worth, and because it's rare not because of its actual use. Malevich is rare, only a limited number of paintings in circulation. And he is valuable as historically established.

    • @emilnikolic
      @emilnikolic 4 ปีที่แล้ว

      You can't understand banksy?

    • @llamaliammm
      @llamaliammm 4 ปีที่แล้ว +13

      Exactly, and even his black square wasn’t just a black square, there were strokes, ways of painting which is evidence of his mastery. Now, those idiots paint the way I color my drawings when I was 5

    • @milkyii
      @milkyii 4 ปีที่แล้ว

      Same tho

  • @RANDOMstuffanimation
    @RANDOMstuffanimation 4 ปีที่แล้ว +737

    Cavemen paintings looked alot better... Shows how much we devolved...

    • @tamerov2387
      @tamerov2387 4 ปีที่แล้ว +32

      Cavemen paintings are genius!

    • @greenpeppermint7518
      @greenpeppermint7518 4 ปีที่แล้ว +26

      I don't think we devolved i just think the art in the museum devolved. Most of the public hates modern art. They still like still art of fruit and art Renaissance Art and art with beauty and expression

    • @stygian8049
      @stygian8049 4 ปีที่แล้ว +3

      @@tamerov2387 they can be considered revolutionary at their time

    • @tamerov2387
      @tamerov2387 4 ปีที่แล้ว

      @@stygian8049 And even beautiful today ;)

    • @ignaciobravo5129
      @ignaciobravo5129 4 ปีที่แล้ว +5

      Picasso said the same. From the cavermen paitning of Atapuerca to contemporary art, it's decay.
      You may laugh at his cubism work, but checkout the paintings he did at 14 y.old, he won a realistic painting contest

  • @JayeDoesArts
    @JayeDoesArts 4 ปีที่แล้ว +484

    I love cubism and semi-realistic and etc
    But, those scribble ones who just swoosh the paint into the canvas.
    I'm sorry, but I really can't understand it for some reason 😭

    • @everythingsgaming525
      @everythingsgaming525 4 ปีที่แล้ว +2

      Neither can i

    • @paweljanicki9657
      @paweljanicki9657 4 ปีที่แล้ว +25

      Yea... Abstract looks like one of my drawings from when I was about 3 years old

    • @id34l48
      @id34l48 4 ปีที่แล้ว +13

      That simple swooshing is how the mega rich feel everyday that's why they relate to it. Imagine how easy life is when u have countless millions to lose and still have more to lose.

    • @pablo1835rigel
      @pablo1835rigel 4 ปีที่แล้ว

      Kandinsky is a legend to me.

    • @Kasparoscar
      @Kasparoscar 4 ปีที่แล้ว +2

      There's nothing to understand, it's just crap.

  • @loveleeluv7
    @loveleeluv7 ปีที่แล้ว +2

    "No matter what the artist intended, art is now seen as an EASY INVESTMENT by many (really the GALLERIES), and COMPANIES HAVE APPEARED TO TREAT ART PURELY AS AN ASSET FOR FINANCIAL GAIN." INSIDER BUSINESS

  • @aoitakumi9081
    @aoitakumi9081 2 ปีที่แล้ว +1781

    I've seen an artist paints amazing landscape, one drew with ballpoint pen, I have also seen a guy smash a mirror to make portraits and they are underrated. Now I'm seeing what looks like a child's artwork being sold for millions. Just why?

    • @فازقنطارا
      @فازقنطارا 2 ปีที่แล้ว +144

      @Spooky Ghost u good?

    • @idonotconsent138
      @idonotconsent138 2 ปีที่แล้ว +183

      Money laundering.

    • @robinhylands69
      @robinhylands69 2 ปีที่แล้ว +69

      It's about identity. That's why they value "novelty" above all. People often want to feel unique and elite, and buying beautiful or good art is tainted by the poorer people's association with it. Its a lot like how "high" fashion ("brand" names with expensive logos) has changed to become ridiculous since clothing manufacturing had become so cheap. This is as opposed to pre industrial times, where beautiful art was highly valued by the wealthy (still is sometimes of course; not all wealthy people have no taste).
      And of course there's money laundering and all those shenanigans.

    • @florisdriessen2867
      @florisdriessen2867 2 ปีที่แล้ว +27

      Because Skills aren't rare anymore

    • @OphiuchiChannel
      @OphiuchiChannel 2 ปีที่แล้ว +23

      @@florisdriessen2867 exactly. It's about novelty, though-provoking, authenticity and concepts.

  • @goddessofdragons1996
    @goddessofdragons1996 4 ปีที่แล้ว +806

    And that’s why local artists who actually have talent can’t sell their art 💁🏻‍♀️

    • @saradorcic5310
      @saradorcic5310 4 ปีที่แล้ว +15

      Talent isn't a real thing, its years of work that get people where they are.

    • @goddessofdragons1996
      @goddessofdragons1996 4 ปีที่แล้ว +51

      Sara Dorcic Yes and no. Someone with talent for something is naturally good at it. It doesn’t take years to recognize their talent. Others aren’t good at something and take years to be good at that thing. Throwing paint on a canvas doesn’t take talent.

    • @saradorcic5310
      @saradorcic5310 4 ปีที่แล้ว +6

      @@goddessofdragons1996 Ofc it doesnt XD but i am yet to see a child that draws portraits like da vinci.. A person can have potential and show interest, but you only get better and more "perfect" as you work and improve

    • @thepriceofsalt9003
      @thepriceofsalt9003 4 ปีที่แล้ว +14

      talent is a concept. if there's no effort, talent can't take you anywhere. talent just means a flair for something. no matter how much flair you demonstrate, you need work to produce something substantial.

    • @meiji1815
      @meiji1815 4 ปีที่แล้ว +3

      @@thepriceofsalt9003 you're right talent ain't real but skills are. Skills that is full of hardwork will never betray you

  • @potatopertato
    @potatopertato 4 ปีที่แล้ว +727

    Then why digital artists didn't get such treatment. They work as hard too to achieve their level and ability

    • @matsumoto_9562
      @matsumoto_9562 4 ปีที่แล้ว +13

      Anyone can do digital art. Copy and paste. Am a pencil artist and i can tell u its harder.

    • @minizahra
      @minizahra 4 ปีที่แล้ว +209

      @@matsumoto_9562 copy and paste? really?? lmao. if you think anyone can make amazing digital art then ANYONE can be a pencil artist. i do pencil, watercolor and digital, and to say anyone can do one of them is the most biased thing i've heard...there are digital artists out there that can do things that "traditional" artists couldn't even imagine doing.

    • @potatopertato
      @potatopertato 4 ปีที่แล้ว +77

      @@matsumoto_9562 guess u never do digital art then

    • @potatopertato
      @potatopertato 4 ปีที่แล้ว +51

      @@Pfyzer sure traditional artist cannot ctrl z their work, but still have u seen the professional digital artists drawings? It's all a matter of skills and hard work too.
      But let's say that's the case, but the difference in treatment is still too big.

    • @CuongN24
      @CuongN24 4 ปีที่แล้ว +10

      Most digital art only existed in online space and people don’t have to pay money to have the artwork

  • @somyongkim8237
    @somyongkim8237 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    It seems to me that people who defend modern art claim that it is a personal expression of emotion from the artist and therefore, it has value. In 3:26, the speaker states that any person could make a black canvas, but because the artist put lots of thought into the work and had a journey to arrive to the work, the plain black canvas has value. However, you're not buying the journey or the thought, you're buying the stupid black canvas (which you could DIY at home). The journey and thought is deeply personal. It is an insult to the artist to think that one could buy that personal journey with rich people paper.

  • @6root91
    @6root91 4 ปีที่แล้ว +193

    No matter how much thought or emotion you put into it, the majority of this 'modern art' is just 5 minutes worth of splashing paint onto a canvas.

    • @Mica_T
      @Mica_T 4 ปีที่แล้ว +2

      Van Gogh: Am I joke to you?

    • @mingfei1622
      @mingfei1622 4 ปีที่แล้ว +11

      INDIGO BLUEoO woah, don’t pull Van Gogh into this, his artwork belong to Impressionism era not to the crap era

    • @Mica_T
      @Mica_T 4 ปีที่แล้ว +2

      @@mingfei1622 actually it's post-impressionism, or expressionism. And yes, this movement is actually categorised as part of the modernism, and is a precursor movement to minimalism and geometric abstraction. Go check it.

    • @ThatMilkJuice
      @ThatMilkJuice 4 ปีที่แล้ว

      That what I previously commented about is the TIME! Painting takes forever especially when your satisfied with the work

  • @samankhanArt
    @samankhanArt 4 ปีที่แล้ว +994

    “Art isn’t about beauty” That hurts as a scenery painter and calligrapher 😞😭
    Edit: 1k likes? Yall really understand my pain 😩💓

    • @wherearemydamfrenchfries8013
      @wherearemydamfrenchfries8013 4 ปีที่แล้ว +29

      Saman Khan art is kinda everything BUT hear me here BUT some art is not for 5mil or worth that is a SQUARE I mean , Really ?

    • @xyperkhert3055
      @xyperkhert3055 4 ปีที่แล้ว +9

      Im also painting scenery...yeah u got a point

    • @le_dr3677
      @le_dr3677 4 ปีที่แล้ว +15

      Art is beauty

    • @leandrofrancoramirez8833
      @leandrofrancoramirez8833 4 ปีที่แล้ว +5

      Art is about feelings of the viewer.
      The way should be, the artist share your vision and the viewer respond to them.
      But, even un that case the success of that paint or whatever, is not guarenteed because "that day", maybe, have a bad day or a good day.
      I' m just a normal person, who has nothing to do with art, but is my perception.

    • @kanrooihumera710
      @kanrooihumera710 4 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      Vangogh scenery is not that beauty but still make a masterpiece

  • @InventaChris
    @InventaChris 4 ปีที่แล้ว +625

    Let's be real: most of these are money laundering vehicles.

    • @WillemJH
      @WillemJH 4 ปีที่แล้ว

      They legitematly are not

    • @ObscureMachines
      @ObscureMachines 4 ปีที่แล้ว +2

      EXACTLY! Get enough hobnobbers drinking their own Kool-Aid for long enough and eventually everyone will believe it.

    • @preetidaimari6079
      @preetidaimari6079 4 ปีที่แล้ว +2

      I'd rather paint em myself than spend so much money

    • @MichaelJOneill333
      @MichaelJOneill333 4 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      For sure

    • @Luka1180
      @Luka1180 4 ปีที่แล้ว

      @@WillemJH They legitimately* are.*

  • @WhiskeyTangoFoxtrot9
    @WhiskeyTangoFoxtrot9 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    "I could do that" + "Yeah but you didn't" = MODERN ART

  • @rizshrestha6591
    @rizshrestha6591 4 ปีที่แล้ว +793

    Public: So why is simple art so expensive if I can do it ?
    “Experts”: 🤷‍♂️

    • @d3r4g45
      @d3r4g45 4 ปีที่แล้ว +22

      Like asking why CardiB crap music example made her a millionaire if anyone can do it.

    • @fasihullah8386
      @fasihullah8386 4 ปีที่แล้ว +12

      Because they didn't do it

    • @Pantsu51
      @Pantsu51 4 ปีที่แล้ว +23

      Lol I always laugh with that stupid argument. People claim all the time that they can do it but still none of them ever did it. Why is that? Maybe because none of them actually know a shit about art in general? I wonder. (Before starting to attack me I’m no art person, I just hate smartass people that have an opinion about EVERYTHING, without having the slightest idea about what they’re talking about.)

    • @moichibb
      @moichibb 4 ปีที่แล้ว +23

      @@Pantsu51 you have a point. Slapping paint on a canvas is easy, selling it is hard. Tbh a circle on a canvas gets more attention from the public (good or bad) than art that is praise worthy due to outrage etc. It is like shitty merch with a small logo on something from a big celeb.

    • @tkokflux6322
      @tkokflux6322 4 ปีที่แล้ว +6

      It’s valued like that because people will pay that much you may think you can create something like this and I am sure you can but you are mr nobody for now so it won’t be as valued