Deriving Planck's Law | The Equation That Began Quantum Physics

แชร์
ฝัง
  • เผยแพร่เมื่อ 20 ก.ย. 2024

ความคิดเห็น • 87

  • @tirthakamaldatta158
    @tirthakamaldatta158 3 ปีที่แล้ว +19

    Your classes are the best. The way you teach physics , in a easy way is really appreciable.........

  • @shovanray3557
    @shovanray3557 3 ปีที่แล้ว +17

    Your videos are really legendary to enhance the spectra of my learning and spark the flame of curiousity within my spirit

  • @skhatnavliya6343
    @skhatnavliya6343 3 ปีที่แล้ว +5

    In my opinion you are the best teacher of physics...I have watched so many videos for understanding quantum mechanics but your lecture is best... trust me..best.

  • @parmindersingh-cx2qw
    @parmindersingh-cx2qw 3 ปีที่แล้ว +11

    You’re doing the great job, thank you so much for this knowledge, I’ll never miss your video again :)

  • @douglasstrother6584
    @douglasstrother6584 3 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

    Planck's approach was to analyze the entropy of blackbody radiation as a function of energy. To make both high-frequency and low-frequency data consistent with the Second Law of Thermodynamics, he included an additional "guess" term proportional to the frequency (hf); this results in Planck's Law. Planck's application of Boltzmann's Statistical Mechanics to justify his guess then led to his conclusion that the material of the walls emit and absorb radiation in discrete quanta.
    A paper titled "Planck’s Route to the Black Body Radiation Formula and Quantization" by Michael Fowler (7/25/08) gives a nice discussion.

  • @cliveharris1433
    @cliveharris1433 3 ปีที่แล้ว +5

    Thank you for including and explaining every step. I was able to follow all to the end.

  • @deveshyadav950
    @deveshyadav950 3 ปีที่แล้ว +5

    Your explanation is making everything so simple. I'm loving it..👍😍

  • @physicsjourney1114
    @physicsjourney1114 3 ปีที่แล้ว +5

    This video is really wonderful. The derivation you have done is really amazing i never forget it anyway it is very clear and waiting for your next ones. Clear detailed information and derivation.❤️❤️❤️

  • @ocayaro
    @ocayaro 2 ปีที่แล้ว +3

    Actually, Planck called h the “hope” constant, in the hope that he would return twitter to correct it. It was an escape he used. Extremely useful presentation, my friend.

  • @subhransupattanayak2571
    @subhransupattanayak2571 3 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    The video was flawless, precise and mathematically revealing. But just one request to upload a video explaining all the physics behind this mathematics, like why did Planck assume that emission and absorption to be quantized? And the physical meaning behind probability of energy distribution that was used in the derivation.

  • @dyludylu
    @dyludylu 3 หลายเดือนก่อน

    love the fact that you go over the derivation, most textbooks just give the formula and leave it at that :-) one point: for the binomial expansion to converge don't we need -1 < x < 1? x >0 should be straightforward to see but how do we know x

  • @UROOZFATIMA190
    @UROOZFATIMA190 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    I Like mathematics so much and i am so interested in physics also. And quantum mechanics is combination of both .
    I like this series so much.

  • @piyusharora8626
    @piyusharora8626 3 ปีที่แล้ว +3

    I am in class 11. The way you are teaching quantum physics is mesmerising. I like your way of explaining the theories, derivations. I am learning so much new things. Thank you for coming with this series.

  • @Thaimeii
    @Thaimeii 2 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Thank you sir,i have been looking for this video to clear my doubts.

  • @amalm.p4809
    @amalm.p4809 3 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Bro you are superb and I will be respectful for your work and your efficiency keep going ...

  • @prj26
    @prj26 3 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Simplifying the equation in such a simple is great. Nice one....
    👍
    Loved it..

  • @deveshyadav950
    @deveshyadav950 3 ปีที่แล้ว +7

    How was the value of plank's constant calculated??

    • @demonkingrimuru7844
      @demonkingrimuru7844 10 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      Using monochrome leds calculating the voltage and and evaluating it with the value of energy and as the leds are monochromatic we just need to put the values of lambda and c and E , then by E=hc/lambda => h=E×lambda/c

    • @ankitbhattacharjee_iitkgp
      @ankitbhattacharjee_iitkgp 5 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      Photoelectric Effect experiment

  • @MohammedKObeid
    @MohammedKObeid 5 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Amazing job, sir. You did an excellent performance❤👍👍

  • @asuntus366
    @asuntus366 2 ปีที่แล้ว

    Good job done🙏, your video has cut down the time I would have spent to figure things out from my lecture notes. I 💚 it.

  • @mithleshkumarsah2344
    @mithleshkumarsah2344 2 ปีที่แล้ว

    Because of you I understand this today...keep moving forward sir

  • @TIMOTHYMLAWLOR
    @TIMOTHYMLAWLOR 2 ปีที่แล้ว

    Outstanding! A supremely clear derivation.

  • @giovanimendes1550
    @giovanimendes1550 3 ปีที่แล้ว

    I'm a beginner on Quantum Mechanics but I could follow 'til the end. Thanks for all the detailed explanation. Greetings from Sao Paulo, Brazil

  • @Frank-ie8dh
    @Frank-ie8dh 11 หลายเดือนก่อน

    For the binomial expansion, if you substitute x=2, you get right side equals 1 and left side infinity. Why?

  • @abubakarsadickaziz8513
    @abubakarsadickaziz8513 3 ปีที่แล้ว

    of all the videos I watched on youtube. is you that made this lesson clear and easy for me wow, wow God really bless you for helping me to pass my exam

  • @sujal00123
    @sujal00123 3 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    I am waiting for your video you are awesome in explaning quantum mechanics love you sir😘♥️❤️❤️♥️

  • @samarehab9029
    @samarehab9029 2 ปีที่แล้ว

    thank you, sir. please don't stop posting

  • @mohammadhosseinkholghifard
    @mohammadhosseinkholghifard 10 หลายเดือนก่อน

    This video was so useful for me.
    I appreciate you.🙏🏻

  • @youssefzaki3521
    @youssefzaki3521 3 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Thank you so much Sir! ❤❤

  • @kishoriranade8074
    @kishoriranade8074 3 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Wonderful video .Really loved it.

  • @saveearth9816
    @saveearth9816 ปีที่แล้ว

    .. I had watched many videos about this phenomenon (BLACK BODY RADIATION)
    what was confusing me is how they construct the curve for each certain temperature.... Then I understand that they heat the matter for e. g to 3000 K the body will glow (emit visible light +IR&UV ray) then they will pass this light through glassy prism which will analyse it into the spectrum including visible colors +IR&UV... Then they measure the intensity of each part of the spectrum (starting from IR...then visible light colors ended by UV)
    Plot wave length (horizontal) & intensity longitudinal
    THANKS & SORRY FOR THE BAD ENGLISH I USED

  • @225rip
    @225rip 2 ปีที่แล้ว

    Excellent video and very well broken down so I could follow it. Thanks

  • @Matrix_Decoded
    @Matrix_Decoded 3 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Yayieee new video ❤️

  • @AsmaaNazeh-f2r
    @AsmaaNazeh-f2r 3 ปีที่แล้ว

    I'm from egypt and i sport you , continue

  • @avinashsh4886
    @avinashsh4886 2 ปีที่แล้ว

    Good explanation about planck's theory 👏

  • @dominicestebanrice7460
    @dominicestebanrice7460 2 ปีที่แล้ว

    First of all, THANK YOU for taking the time to create this content; it is MOST helpful and you are a superb math/science communicator & teacher. I have a fundamental question please: at 10' 12" in the video, when you begin substituting in zero & positive integer values, why did Plank regard this as permissible? Why not non-integers? What stops us assuming 'n' equals root 2 or Pi? Or even a negative integer? Was it that he discovered this by trial & error and found that this (0, 1, 2, 3....) assumption just happened to output the values that agreed with the blackbody spectrum, or did he have something more fundamental in mind? Thank you sir.

    • @realbruh850
      @realbruh850 8 หลายเดือนก่อน

      n is for no. of waves so it cant be -ve irr etc

  • @hatirladimsimdi
    @hatirladimsimdi ปีที่แล้ว

    Excellent materials.

  • @roberthayter157
    @roberthayter157 3 ปีที่แล้ว

    Really enjoyable. Thanks. Very clearly explained.

  • @amalm.p4809
    @amalm.p4809 3 ปีที่แล้ว

    Dislikes from nothing understanded guys keep going bro always in support for your rise

  • @EnochBrown-s5j
    @EnochBrown-s5j 11 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Outstanding!!!

  • @jibiraj9816
    @jibiraj9816 2 ปีที่แล้ว

    Thankuuu. Very simple and understandable😁

  • @ethanleou8132
    @ethanleou8132 ปีที่แล้ว

    This video helps me a lot! Thank you

  • @ExplorerNeu
    @ExplorerNeu 3 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Thank you so much ❤❤❤

  • @samuelarango4567
    @samuelarango4567 ปีที่แล้ว

    Where can I find how the equation for the number of modes per unit volume inside the cavity is derived?

  • @victordhendecourt7443
    @victordhendecourt7443 ปีที่แล้ว

    I am a beginner in quantum mechanics and I am just satisfying my boredom. I get the derivations so far, it all makes sense mathematically. I just dont exactly know where e^-En/kT comes from, if anyone could help me with this I would greatly appreciate it.

  • @adilnawaz7050
    @adilnawaz7050 3 ปีที่แล้ว

    Please another videos discuss spacetime and spacetime intervals

  • @namratakadam8007
    @namratakadam8007 2 ปีที่แล้ว

    Why did you multiply energy with probability

  • @saumyaraj3689
    @saumyaraj3689 2 ปีที่แล้ว

    Omg...I really understood
    Thank you sir

  • @aynurmemet5576
    @aynurmemet5576 3 ปีที่แล้ว

    Handsome & smart teacher. 🙏

  • @PradeepKumar-ug5ut
    @PradeepKumar-ug5ut 3 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Dude, keep it up Bhai 🙏♥️

  • @raivivektyagi1877
    @raivivektyagi1877 2 ปีที่แล้ว

    Tq so much sir for making this helpful video 🙏

  • @jlpsinde
    @jlpsinde 2 ปีที่แล้ว

    Very good thanks

  • @dinglerdangler
    @dinglerdangler 2 ปีที่แล้ว

    really good video. thank you !!!!!!!!!!

  • @selin4393
    @selin4393 ปีที่แล้ว

    you are a legend thank you

  • @PalakSoni-sx4xk
    @PalakSoni-sx4xk 9 หลายเดือนก่อน

    awesome channel ...

  • @muhd-kifayath
    @muhd-kifayath 2 ปีที่แล้ว

    Planck proposed it before Rayleigh-Jean

  • @RahulSharmaSingularity
    @RahulSharmaSingularity 2 ปีที่แล้ว

    Fantastic Stuff !

  • @voidisyinyangvoidisyinyang885
    @voidisyinyangvoidisyinyang885 2 ปีที่แล้ว

    that was pure genius!

  • @EnochBrown-s5j
    @EnochBrown-s5j 10 หลายเดือนก่อน

    I disagree. Rayleigh and Jeans were correct in saying that any amount of energy could be exchanged between radiation and matter. However, they were wrong in their assumption that the radiation subsequently emitted by matter would likewise tend toward waves of shorter and shorter wavelength. I can understand their point because waves of higher frequency have a greater number of modes, so it is logical to assume that there are more standing waves as frequency increases. The equation they posited, however, was and is wrong. The radiation subsequently emitted by matter is emitted in quanta consistent with the energy orbitals within the atom''s structure. Rayleigh and Jeans knew nothing about atomic structure including orbitals and the quantum leaps necessary to both elevate and lower the electron among the orbitals, so it is reasonable that they did not posit an accurate model of reality. Furthermore, a standing wave emitted by an atom after receiving a sufficient amount of EM radiation is discrete insofar as it elevates to a higher orbital and then drops to its original orbital.

  • @demonkingrimuru7844
    @demonkingrimuru7844 9 หลายเดือนก่อน

    How did u reach the conclusion e-En/kt

  • @surenmoodley7744
    @surenmoodley7744 3 ปีที่แล้ว

    Wonderful explanation 👍👌

  • @riteshrk18
    @riteshrk18 3 ปีที่แล้ว

    What is harmonic oscillator here?
    Can anyone tell PLZZ

    • @roberthayter157
      @roberthayter157 3 ปีที่แล้ว

      The electromagnetic wave is the harmonic oscillator. This video explains the Raleigh-Jeans Law, which was a failed attempt to do what Planck did. th-cam.com/video/rCfPQLVzus4/w-d-xo.html

  • @nachiketachakraborty1409
    @nachiketachakraborty1409 ปีที่แล้ว

    Can you suggest some books for this topic?

  • @GALADIUM
    @GALADIUM ปีที่แล้ว

    I understood everything except the mathematical manipulation of binomial expansion ,

  • @yewdimer1465
    @yewdimer1465 2 ปีที่แล้ว

    @5:44 you really left us hanging on that didn't you... really good apart from that tho (:

  • @ivankoshovyi6068
    @ivankoshovyi6068 ปีที่แล้ว

    Sorry man, but 1+2x+3x^2+... = 1/(1-x)^2 makes no sense. Also where did you get that probability formula?

  • @Neodymigo
    @Neodymigo ปีที่แล้ว

    You have done this on a volume basis which is not very useful
    On an emitting area basis Plancks law is Intensity =2pi h c^2 / lamda^5 * 1/ (e^hc/ktlamda -1)
    which is much different than yours.

  • @gouravmahar1958
    @gouravmahar1958 10 หลายเดือนก่อน

    bhott acha padate ho sir app

  • @karthikyadav1437
    @karthikyadav1437 ปีที่แล้ว

    Super 👌

  • @bam2xgalon670
    @bam2xgalon670 3 ปีที่แล้ว

    Quantum for teleportation?

  • @krushnachandrashankhua637
    @krushnachandrashankhua637 3 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Perfect 😘👍

  • @AbuSous2000PR
    @AbuSous2000PR 2 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    this is the ONLY video that showed how to derive Plank's law...the rest jump over the critical pieces
    what is amazing.. that Plank postulated..he was guessing... he was frustrated... and found by accident a formula that just fitted the experimental data
    in other words..it was a hack which he hated but that was the best he can do🤲
    however..it was Elbert Einstein who put it all together. Initially.. Plank rejected his conclusion
    what is funny.. that even Elbert himself.. didn't believe in quantum mechanics (which he discovered) since it entailed quantum entanglement which he called spoky🤣
    he died fighting the idea

  • @umesh6856
    @umesh6856 3 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Hey

  • @charanreddy66
    @charanreddy66 3 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    U didn't explain how you got that probability 😂

  • @gaurav3794
    @gaurav3794 3 ปีที่แล้ว

    what is that n called

  • @t0ny360
    @t0ny360 3 ปีที่แล้ว

    You are god on earth