Except how many billable $600 hours she pretended to work. Did either def or prosecution actually adk her anyrhing specific about Michelle's case? Or just "in general"?
This is such an excellent cross examination of the doctor on memory. Sorry the judge thinks it's unhinged, he is brilliantly showing what a scam these experts are . Making so much money, in my view coluding with the Defendant. Well done State Prosecutor 👏👏👏👏👏👏
Memory Expert...best cross-examination ever! So entertaining! Whoever is paying this woman any money needs to terminate any contracts with her. She came across like a complete Quack-a-doodle.
The “Doctor/Scientist” needs a complete Mental Competency Evaluation … and should be prohibited from being an Expert Witness … she clearly has problems mentally specifically with her memory
As entertaining as this doctor is, my vote for best worst expert ever is the one from the Leticia stauch case. Remember she had her son in the interview with the defendant after she just said no one should be in the room! That lady was Gaga!
That cross was by far the best I’ve seen totally annihilating the witness’s credibility - bar none! THAT WAS PRICELESS! This man should get himself a well deserved raise!
Judge Randolph blows my mind in his brilliant knowledge and understanding of every rule of law of the courts . He is what every Judge in Judicial system should follow .
I love the way he speaks and his knowledge. And the way he eloquently repeats the question, states the law, and is just like…. “Sustained” he has such a low but booming voice
today was just strange...another string of worthless witnesses with judge randomly and frequently calling recess...and then at the end some witness seating herself on the stand and then getting down and court ending. What is the world?
The so-called “Expert Witness” was definitely more than strange but the Prosecutor was just plain BRILLIANT - thank goodness … Troconis is going down … She will be saying bye bye to freedom very soon
They're supposed to be non-bias & present their expert knowledge with facts. Of course the defense should choose the witness who aligns with their presentation of their case. (Especially @ $700 an hour)It backfired today it seems.
The Realtor testimony was very important. She said that the house showing on the 25 was for a client that was not interested in buying the property as it was completely of budget. They just wanted to check the finishings of the house to eventually build a house. The excuse for cleaning the house is not so great then as they just wanted to have a quick look and did only check a few features. This lasted only 10 mins according to the Realtor.
Has anyone noticed the side eyes and the wide eyes the Doctor constantly gives to the jury after the state asks a question, as if her innocence presumption of Michelle is already the answer in the juror’s minds. It’s appalling.
Let’s hope so. Interesting she consulted for so many cases, but they were smart enough not to hire her. Wow her short term memory is bad. Her long term memory is bad. What’s left? Total sell out. UCI should be ashamed she works for them.
@@tasst2674 my experience of 'educated experts' in work & a family member is they tend to be a one trick pony, can't think outside the box, if its not within prescribed ranges it doesn't exist and have little or no common sense.
The good doctor said statistics show people with higher education have better memories. My sweet mama told me there were exceptions to every rule. The exception to the good doctor’s rule was on the stand today and eviscerated by the prosecutor.
Wow. I’d have thought a memory expert would have a better memory? Most of her testimony is very vague. Not remembering the subtitle of her book? No dates when studies were done, no records of them being published, etc
12:30 court begins. Motion for prosecution protective order re: attorney Rose testimony with former client Fotis divorce proceedings. Jury arrives 16:50 Memory Expert Loftus, experimental psychologist and professor at UC Irvine 01:36:55 return from break with cross-exam 02:11:15 - 04:19:25 lunch break; return with neighbor Henry T French Jr 04:25:45 Attorney Rose 05:03:30 cross exam 05:34:00 return from break, continue cross 05:41:00 real estate agent Ms M. 06:02:00 Sgt Allegro 06:17:42 strange situation with MT crying while there's a sidebar, an unknown witness takes stand then leaves (wasn't called to the stand). Court ends abruptly..
I think that the divorce and child custody needed to be more exposed. We need to see why the custody battle was so full of animosity, There is more to this than has been explored.
@@l.g.4075 I think she means more of a motive to get answers as to why they would do something so terrible. We know a somewhat motive but what really drove him to do such a heinous crime. Or if anything at all! Some people are just horrible
And the defense attorney says "I got to meet Michelle's Mom and Dad!" I think his loyalty was not to his coward client who killed himself but to the defendant Michelle Troconis.
The expert for the defense is disappointing to say the least. She is biased for the defendants, most of them murderers, child molesters and killers etc...how does someone stoop so low. Is it the money?
Well if you think about it.... defendants will be the ones claiming terrible memory and prosecution is usually the state, so her work lies primarily with the ones doing/accused of the crime
At the very end of court today, while they were having that last side bar, was that MTs sister that came and took the stand for a second - before apparently being told to sit back down? Guess we will be seeing her in the morning eh? Also MT was in tears at the end today - perhaps she knows her fate is sealed…?
What an absolute snake shone is. To pay someone like that scientist to make excuses for MT’s lies. I hope the jury members have more brain cells than he gives them credit for. Despicable.
She made zero excuses for Michelle. She got on the stand and testified to memory research which is her specialty. She did not discuss that in context of the Troconis interrogation at all. Or did I miss something?! The memory research is left for the jury to do with want they want in terms of applying it to this trial. Never once did she make any claims about Troconis’s memory or the truth of her stories. Why is everyone acting like she got up on stand and said “Michelle Troconis never lied and here’s why…” Calm down, geez.
@@carterphelps3156 if it failed, it failed. That’s up to the jury. But the defense is doing their job. They’re trying to give the jury (valid) alternative explanations as to why someone might make inconsistent statements over the course of three long interviews. The jury might say, we hear you but we still don’t believe her. That’s fine. That doesn’t mean the defense shouldn’t at least try. It doesn’t mean defense attorney is a “snake.” Everyone in the country is allowed an adequate defense when convicted of a crime. The memory expert never got up there and said “Michelle Troconis is telling the truth.” All she did was get up there and explain how humans might behave or recall information under various situations.
i think when you see. your own family going to that stand it brings the tears. (If that is her sister..I mean what is she going to add here about what her sister did).
@@ritayammouni2803 well we now know it was a very good friend so could have made her cry....but also good for show given she knew she would not even get on the stand...so jury will have to decide for themselves how well she understands and speaks english (very well by all accounts) and if she is lying. I think any outsider looking at this case so far would deem her guilty of something...there will simply not be a not guilty verdict.
All of this expert’s testimony is general without even being tailored to each situation. She is not speaking to the defendant’s interrogation. Get her off the stand.
I was trying to watch the last day of trial and it says you have to pay. I don't understand why. I've watched every day for free, but today it's pay only.
Didn’t one of Johnny Depp’s witnesses get stricken and removed because she watched portions of the live trial? If so I’m confused why this gal’s testimony is allowed.
I followed this trial all those days now- it really is disgusting for me to see MT not taking the stand, not taking responsibility for any of her actions. Life of another person has no value for her, she accepts the death of another person, a mother of 5 innocent children. And in the end she pretends not understanding English👎👎🤮🤮🤮🤮
This trial has gotten national attention. She's already guilty in the court of public opinion. Even if she isn't found guilty in court of law, life will never be the same for MT.
Oh gosh misinformation! She’s one of those. Michelle was not beaten, tortured etc during her interrogation. Why no objection for here say as her colleagues said blah blah blah.
Before i say this, ive folllowed E. Loftuses career since AP Psychology in 10th grade and I did watch both Durst trials. I am also aware that Loftus is quite controversial. I lost all respect for the purported chat moderator 'JenLo' who rather then making effforts to chill the floodgates of insutls and invectives hurled Mrs.Loftus's way (i.e, youre not allowed to make fun of ANY witness--according to chat rules). The chat moderator also stps in and fills in gaps for newer trial watchers so that, ideally, no one is left behind as far as courtrooon and legal concepts and vocabulary. The main moderator for this channel does a really good job of overall assuming the position of the content creator on various tops (i.e., youre watching a conservative show; you get conservative moderators and vice versa. But the problem with "JenLo" just joining the stampede of hatred for Loftus was thats not the official position of the channel. Secondly, it does not promote healtthy discourse or dialog about her arguments or whatever she had to share. And finally jokes about her 'memory' only serve to make the entirety of the chat MORE IGNNORANT and less educated moving forward because the question of wether or not Loftus has crappy memory has no bearing on wether her research and her arguments are sceinntifcally and logicallly valid and well-founded. Thats called an 'ad hominem' logical fallacy. If a psychologist was testifying on his life work studying 'human nervousness in relation to public speaking' and when he testified, he appeared nervous; that says nothing about the quality of his peer-reveiwed scholarship. Why? Because you are attacking the man and not the arguments themselves. Oh and attacking him being nervous on the stand violates your OWN chat policy that you never enforece when its not convient to do so. i expect this comment to magically disapper, Thanks, Have a Great Day
Her deceased boyfriend's attorney Rose was hot for this defendant -- saying she was always happy, smiling, warm, as attorney Rose smiles ear to ear. All the chummy conversations he recalls on his trip down memory lane.
It’s funny to see how people who work within the law and justice system understand what the defense are doing and why they’re doing it and everyone else not so much.
We understand what the defense is doing. It’s just despicable. I know someone has to defend these criminals, but everyone else is wrong, lying, dirty etc, except the defendant of course. Enjoy counting all those big bucks for which they sold their souls.
She has been snowed over by the defense and it’s sad a doctor comes into court with HER OBJECTIVE RULING that she’s “innocent” so she answers the questions very smug!!
I think they paused because Michelle decided to finally save herself and tell them what she knows because when her atty said “may we approach “ she was crying then the witness went up there to testify and they told her to step back down then the judge said something about we were discussing scheduling. Not sure if I believe him lol. We’ll see only 1 witness why didn’t they allow her today?
Someone help me out here. Did I miss something with the memory expert? From what I listened to, she made zero excuses for Michelle. She got on the stand and testified to memory research which is her specialty. She did not discuss that in context of the Troconis interrogation at all. Or did I miss something?! The memory research is left for the jury to do with want they want in terms of applying it to this trial. Never once did she make any claims about Troconis’s memory or the truth of her stories. Why is everyone acting like she got up on stand and said “Michelle Troconis never lied and here’s why…” Everybody calm down.
Kind of complicated but she wrote a book on how some experts get personal feelings the defendant is definitely not guilty, she believes Traconis just forgot & mixed up timelines, not lieing. She stated this bout middle of testifying, prosecutors did their research knowing this lady has added to defense on some of the worst murderers & she basically always testifies for defense because she sees defendants getting thrown in prison a lot of times due to memory confusions, etc. which is true for many in prison that are not guilty but like Traconis & the serial sick murderers she has helped defense on,,,noooo.
She isn’t opining. She just spoke I generalities which is totally useless. Why did they even hire her? I would like to see the 48 pages of her Cv and see if she out recipes in there just to fill it up? She probably has lots of consulting, but didn’t get hired to testify as she is horrible.
The lady prosecutor is asking bad questions of the realtor lady. All she needed to do was have her refer to the exhibit that SHOWS the times she reached out to FD on 5/24 and times FD finally responded. The lady prosecutor is easily pulled off her game. As soon as defens called the lady realtor to stand even I could anticipate the text messages betw her & FD would be at issue. Come ON
The defense lawyer objects whenever the TRUTH is about to come out.
the memory expert doesn't remember anything
Hahaha 😂 👍
Exactly…. I believe that was the states point!
Except how many billable $600 hours she pretended to work. Did either def or prosecution actually adk her anyrhing specific about Michelle's case? Or just "in general"?
Indeed the irony is glaring!! “I don’t recall” and “I can’t remember” soooo many times! 😂
Well that was a waste of $700 - I reckon I could have done better!
This is such an excellent cross examination of the doctor on memory. Sorry the judge thinks it's unhinged, he is brilliantly showing what a scam these experts are .
Making so much money, in my view coluding with the Defendant.
Well done State Prosecutor 👏👏👏👏👏👏
Exactly my thoughts too
Experts are paid. That’s nothing new.
Exactly....
Memory Expert...best cross-examination ever! So entertaining! Whoever is paying this woman any money needs to terminate any contracts with her. She came across like a complete Quack-a-doodle.
The “Doctor/Scientist” needs a complete Mental Competency Evaluation … and should be prohibited from being an Expert Witness … she clearly has problems mentally specifically with her memory
As entertaining as this doctor is, my vote for best worst expert ever is the one from the Leticia stauch case. Remember she had her son in the interview with the defendant after she just said no one should be in the room! That lady was Gaga!
"I Don't Recall That" should be the title of her next book😆🤣😆🤣
That cross was by far the best I’ve seen totally annihilating the witness’s credibility - bar none!
THAT WAS PRICELESS!
This man should get himself a well deserved raise!
John Lewin wrote the page book for destroying this witness on the stand in the Robert Durst trial. Glad to see his cross continuing to be beneficial.
Judge Randolph blows my mind in his brilliant knowledge and understanding of every rule of law of the courts .
He is what every Judge in Judicial system should follow .
I love the way he speaks and his knowledge. And the way he eloquently repeats the question, states the law, and is just like…. “Sustained” he has such a low but booming voice
Over Ruled... love his voice !
Judge Randolph for President!!!!
Yes he is amazing, I'd never remember all them laws 🤣🤣
Yes, he is an exceptional Judge.
Great day for the state! Excellent cross on the defense’s “expert witness”! How embarrassing for Shoehorn. 🤣
Someone put this woman out of our misery… She needs to move along. What an embarrassment for her and her colleagues. She’s just out for the cash.
Yes, that was an excellent cross of this memory expert, she became a perfect witness for the State. Great cross examination!
The Memory Expert couldn’t remember the title to her own book! 😂
The memory expert has a bad or selective memory 😂😂😂😂
😂😂😂
😂
🤣🤣💀💀
The prosecution is brilliant here🤩
Why did they have her testify? She didn’t make a dent for Michelle???
If anything she helped the state !!! 😂
Omg. She can't even remember the title of her book!!! Ha ha.
So much for her expert memory
Well it was in 1991 lol
Exactly I was timed out by mods for reference to 1991 and my sobriety lol
I hope the defense gets their money back from that awful expert witness!!
Is the judge still mad at the prosecutor who questioned the memory expert?
Judge is probably refereeing between state and defense 😂😂
Memory Expert: "I'm sorry, I forgot the question"
She’s such a fraud.
But everyone else has the right to have their question repeated 😂 I get this is new to you but every expert are also human. Yw
Reminded me of the expert (Dr. Dorothy Lewis) for Letecia Stauch-- a disaster.
This is a master class on how to break and expert down 😂😂😂
today was just strange...another string of worthless witnesses with judge randomly and frequently calling recess...and then at the end some witness seating herself on the stand and then getting down and court ending. What is the world?
That lady looked like Michelle’s sister but I could be wrong
The so-called “Expert Witness” was definitely more than strange but the Prosecutor was just plain BRILLIANT - thank goodness … Troconis is going down … She will be saying bye bye to freedom very soon
@@kays1743I thought so too
@@marybryner5562Yes, Michelle is going straight to prison where she belongs. She is guilty.
His defense is an “experimental” memory psychologist?! 😂😂
The end of court michi looking like she knows she's caught!! Please michi do tell where you and fotis put Jennifer.
I'm sorry but isn't a defenses witness supposed to help the defense 😮😅
They're supposed to be non-bias & present their expert knowledge with facts. Of course the defense should choose the witness who aligns with their presentation of their case. (Especially @ $700 an hour)It backfired today it seems.
Expert witness has those ‘hungry ghost’ eyes. 😦 Scary!!!
She doesn’t appear or speak like she is even “mentally competent”
Expert witness getting paid $600/hr but has been watching the trial so that she knows how to respond! WRONG!
She’s had her day and is WELL past her sell by date!
I thought witnesses weren’t allowed to watch any of the trial or is that just for certain cases?
@@chrissilee785expert witnesses are able to watch.
Normal witnesses are not allowed to if “the rule” is ordered.
@@brittanyw4563 ok thank you
Experts are paid. It’s just how it is.
A 43 page CV is ridiculous.
I used to be an intern at the United Nations Development Program and that was common.
At $600/hr memory specialist should remember..lol
Well maybe if they paid her $700/hour she would remember more? She is so bitter she isn’t getting that extra $100/hour!
The Realtor testimony was very important. She said that the house showing on the 25 was for a client that was not interested in buying the property as it was completely of budget. They just wanted to check the finishings of the house to eventually build a house. The excuse for cleaning the house is not so great then as they just wanted to have a quick look and did only check a few features. This lasted only 10 mins according to the Realtor.
Very good point. It's crazy that this was introduced by the defense. It plays against their client imo.
Has anyone noticed the side eyes and the wide eyes the Doctor constantly gives to the jury after the state asks a question, as if her innocence presumption of Michelle is already the answer in the juror’s minds. It’s appalling.
Si wired
Yes I saw that too. Totally inappropriate.
Shoehorn has been doing that same thing with every question throughout this trial
Wait! What? A memory expert consulted on DNA issues related to the OJ Simpson case? Did someone in that case forget they had DNA?
Maybe that's why OJ was acquitted..😂 She's strange!🙄
the memory expert 🤣🤣
Professor Loftus also appeared as a defence 'expert' in the Houston Wig Shop murder case, she was a total disaster that day too.
2:41:19 "the defendant could simply be lying"
"That's possible"
Defence could have saved $$$$$$$$ it's obvious the truth is easy to remember.
Excellent Rebutal from the State ⚖️👋
State prosecutor is amazing!!
Leave Pawel alone!!! Michy is guilty!
I think this might be the memory experts last rodeo.
🤣🤣True!
Let’s hope so. Interesting she consulted for so many cases, but they were smart enough not to hire her. Wow her short term memory is bad. Her long term memory is bad. What’s left? Total sell out. UCI should be ashamed she works for them.
@@tasst2674 my experience of 'educated experts' in work & a family member is they tend to be a one trick pony, can't think outside the box, if its not within prescribed ranges it doesn't exist and have little or no common sense.
And she’s a memory expert ? 😂
The good doctor said statistics show people with higher education have better memories. My sweet mama told me there were exceptions to every rule. The exception to the good doctor’s rule was on the stand today and eviscerated by the prosecutor.
Brilliant observation. Thanks!!!
Beautiful comment, sweetpeas ❤
Wow. I’d have thought a memory expert would have a better memory? Most of her testimony is very vague. Not remembering the subtitle of her book? No dates when studies were done, no records of them being published, etc
The Distinguished Professor worked for Ted Bundy, O.J.Simpson, Phil Spector and Michael Jackson.....YIKES!!!
None of that testimony helped Michelle Traconis.
Hahaha 😂 scary!!!!
Timothy Mcveigh
Police lying during an interrogation shouldn’t affect your answers if they are the truth.
Next question Horn did he have a French fry making machine? Were there good?
Enjoy your last few weeks of freedom Troconis … you won’t be having it once the Jury gets this case to decide your fate!
I hope jurrors get it right
How unprofessional of him to speak to Michelle Triconis of the custody case.
Who?
The memory expert immediately changed her attitude when the prosecution started asking her questions. Clearly a biased “expert”
The memory expert is very impressed with her own 'accomplishments'.
12:30 court begins. Motion for prosecution protective order re: attorney Rose testimony with former client Fotis divorce proceedings. Jury arrives
16:50 Memory Expert Loftus, experimental psychologist and professor at UC Irvine
01:36:55 return from break with cross-exam
02:11:15 - 04:19:25 lunch break; return with neighbor Henry T French Jr
04:25:45 Attorney Rose
05:03:30 cross exam
05:34:00 return from break, continue cross
05:41:00 real estate agent Ms M.
06:02:00 Sgt Allegro
06:17:42 strange situation with MT crying while there's a sidebar, an unknown witness takes stand then leaves (wasn't called to the stand). Court ends abruptly..
Brilliant prosecutor.
Shohorn was disrespectful to all of the state’s witnesses but that wasn’t addressed???
The state slaughtered the memory lady
Guilty! Lock her up
This is so outrageous! A MEMORY SPECIALIST CANT REMEMBER..LOL..THE PROSECUTOR SHOULD HAVE SAID THIS..!
I think that the divorce and child custody needed to be more exposed. We need to see why the custody battle was so full of animosity, There is more to this than has been explored.
That's none of our business, nor a reason for Fotis and Jennifer to plot and kill Michelle.
Why? You think something in it would give a “reason” for Fotus and his side piece to kill Jennifer.
@@l.g.4075 I think she means more of a motive to get answers as to why they would do something so terrible. We know a somewhat motive but what really drove him to do such a heinous crime. Or if anything at all! Some people are just horrible
And the defense attorney says "I got to meet Michelle's Mom and Dad!" I think his loyalty was not to his coward client who killed himself but to the defendant Michelle Troconis.
Bravo to the state it’s about time! Just my opinion, but they need to just lock MT up And be done with it
M.Troconis is finally realizing she will be convicted for her acts⚖️ crying at court .Prison 👋
I hope
And shone still trying to defend FD. Unbelievable.
The expert for the defense is disappointing to say the least. She is biased for the defendants, most of them murderers, child molesters and killers etc...how does someone stoop so low. Is it the money?
100% she’s past her sell-by date!
She also had a terrible losing record on cases she was involved with.
@@LoriB58
stellar comment… 💪👍
Well if you think about it.... defendants will be the ones claiming terrible memory and prosecution is usually the state, so her work lies primarily with the ones doing/accused of the crime
Now I'm curious if any cases she was involved with actually resulted with acquittal or some type of victory?
At the very end of court today, while they were having that last side bar, was that MTs sister that came and took the stand for a second - before apparently being told to sit back down? Guess we will be seeing her in the morning eh? Also MT was in tears at the end today - perhaps she knows her fate is sealed…?
I think it was a friend of hers....
This witness skirts around every question...annoying.
What an absolute snake shone is. To pay someone like that scientist to make excuses for MT’s lies. I hope the jury members have more brain cells than he gives them credit for. Despicable.
She made zero excuses for Michelle. She got on the stand and testified to memory research which is her specialty. She did not discuss that in context of the Troconis interrogation at all. Or did I miss something?! The memory research is left for the jury to do with want they want in terms of applying it to this trial. Never once did she make any claims about Troconis’s memory or the truth of her stories. Why is everyone acting like she got up on stand and said “Michelle Troconis never lied and here’s why…” Calm down, geez.
Then why was she called? We all know what the intent was. And it failed.
@@carterphelps3156 if it failed, it failed. That’s up to the jury. But the defense is doing their job. They’re trying to give the jury (valid) alternative explanations as to why someone might make inconsistent statements over the course of three long interviews. The jury might say, we hear you but we still don’t believe her. That’s fine. That doesn’t mean the defense shouldn’t at least try. It doesn’t mean defense attorney is a “snake.” Everyone in the country is allowed an adequate defense when convicted of a crime. The memory expert never got up there and said “Michelle Troconis is telling the truth.” All she did was get up there and explain how humans might behave or recall information under various situations.
Everybodies seem clowns to the circus.😂😅😊
Where is the defendant’s laptop , replaced by a binder , going low tech now
Omg between the defense attorney and the memory expert it's like zzzz
What happened at the very end of today when a lady too the stand during the sidebar and then abruptly left??
I don’t understand what the judges problem is with the prosecutor he’s not being any worse than the defense lawyer been the whole trial
@melissacraig6315 right
Was that lady on the stand (for a min) after the cop, her sister?? Was she crying because of that or because she knows it doesn’t look good for her??
i think when you see. your own family going to that stand it brings the tears. (If that is her sister..I mean what is she going to add here about what her sister did).
Both
I think she was crying just for show 🤷♀️
@@ritayammouni2803 well we now know it was a very good friend so could have made her cry....but also good for show given she knew she would not even get on the stand...so jury will have to decide for themselves how well she understands and speaks english (very well by all accounts) and if she is lying. I think any outsider looking at this case so far would deem her guilty of something...there will simply not be a not guilty verdict.
@@danielbobberson9849I truly hope you’re right 🤞
All of this expert’s testimony is general without even being tailored to each situation. She is not speaking to the defendant’s interrogation. Get her off the stand.
I was trying to watch the last day of trial and it says you have to pay. I don't understand why. I've watched every day for free, but today it's pay only.
No surprise why she did not testify on some of those big cases. She’s terrible, but she would do it for the money in a heartbeat.
She is afraid to testify she knows she is guilty and didnt want to bring out any more of her thousand lies
Didn't even show court end?? 😮??
How many more years will take to find guilty the gold digger pleaseeeee 🤮
Fotis was the gold digger! Michelle is wealthy
SEAN DID A BRILLIANT JOB ON CROSS!! MITHCELLE IS GUILTY AS SIN!!!
At 2:08:00- does the judge say " lack of respect" or "of space"?
Respect. It’s ok for the defense to be disrespectful, but not the state when it is totally deserved.
No approach.
She watched the trial
Didn’t one of Johnny Depp’s witnesses get stricken and removed because she watched portions of the live trial? If so I’m confused why this gal’s testimony is allowed.
@@ReneS8373I believe expert witnesses are allowed to watch
@@Justbeth-228thanks for clarification. I was like what the….???
Witnesses deemed experts are allowed to sit in court, watch online streaming etc
Woohoo! Defense to rest tomorrow.
A memory expert doesn't remember anything? 👀
Why is Michelle allowed to have a cell phone?
I followed this trial all those days now- it really is disgusting for me to see MT not taking the stand, not taking responsibility for any of her actions. Life of another person has no value for her, she accepts the death of another person, a mother of 5 innocent children. And in the end she pretends not understanding English👎👎🤮🤮🤮🤮
This trial has gotten national attention. She's already guilty in the court of public opinion. Even if she isn't found guilty in court of law, life will never be the same for MT.
She's wealthy. There are different rules for them.
Judge Randolph made this possible to view this trial - he is brilliant
Oh gosh misinformation! She’s one of those. Michelle was not beaten, tortured etc during her interrogation. Why no objection for here say as her colleagues said blah blah blah.
Before i say this, ive folllowed E. Loftuses career since AP Psychology in 10th grade and I did watch both Durst trials. I am also aware that Loftus is quite controversial.
I lost all respect for the purported chat moderator 'JenLo' who rather then making effforts to chill the floodgates of insutls and invectives hurled Mrs.Loftus's way (i.e, youre not allowed to make fun of ANY witness--according to chat rules). The chat moderator also stps in and fills in gaps for newer trial watchers so that, ideally, no one is left behind as far as courtrooon and legal concepts and vocabulary. The main moderator for this channel does a really good job of overall assuming the position of the content creator on various tops (i.e., youre watching a conservative show; you get conservative moderators and vice versa. But the problem with "JenLo" just joining the stampede of hatred for Loftus was thats not the official position of the channel. Secondly, it does not promote healtthy discourse or dialog about her arguments or whatever she had to share. And finally jokes about her 'memory' only serve to make the entirety of the chat MORE IGNNORANT and less educated moving forward because the question of wether or not Loftus has crappy memory has no bearing on wether her research and her arguments are sceinntifcally and logicallly valid and well-founded. Thats called an 'ad hominem' logical fallacy. If a psychologist was testifying on his life work studying 'human nervousness in relation to public speaking' and when he testified, he appeared nervous; that says nothing about the quality of his peer-reveiwed scholarship. Why? Because you are attacking the man and not the arguments themselves. Oh and attacking him being nervous on the stand violates your OWN chat policy that you never enforece when its not convient to do so.
i expect this comment to magically disapper,
Thanks,
Have a Great Day
It's past 5 Eastern time they're gone 😮
🎉Yes !!
This is where Shannon Smith went wrong by not using this witness!
Will MT testify.??
Extremely doubtful. She will be eviscerated by the prosecution if she dares! All we would get are more lies anyway, so..
No way
@@Yogib123 I’ve seen crazier things. 🤷🏻♀️
Murdaugh testified!!
I wish! But I doubt it. Prosecution would destroy her in front of the jury.
Her deceased boyfriend's attorney Rose was hot for this defendant -- saying she was always happy, smiling, warm, as attorney Rose smiles ear to ear. All the chummy conversations he recalls on his trip down memory lane.
Nah. The hairdresser said the same thing.
It’s funny to see how people who work within the law and justice system understand what the defense are doing and why they’re doing it and everyone else not so much.
Care to explain for us laymans
We understand what the defense is doing. It’s just despicable. I know someone has to defend these criminals, but everyone else is wrong, lying, dirty etc, except the defendant of course. Enjoy counting all those big bucks for which they sold their souls.
I object, your Honor!
Overruled alot
What’s happening?
Boring! Make your question defense. What is your point?
Sorry memory lady I do not think it is ethical to implant false memories for science ….disgusting witness I hope the jury see through her she is vile
She has been snowed over by the defense and it’s sad a doctor comes into court with HER OBJECTIVE RULING that she’s “innocent” so she answers the questions very smug!!
Fixed it!
I'm not able to find a live feed of this trial today.....what happened??
I think they paused because Michelle decided to finally save herself and tell them what she knows because when her atty said “may we approach “ she was crying then the witness went up there to testify and they told her to step back down then the judge said something about we were discussing scheduling. Not sure if I believe him lol. We’ll see only 1 witness why didn’t they allow her today?
How would you know she was crying? She never shows her face.
She was very bent over the table & dabbing at her eyes w tissue.
Is court over
For today
Someone help me out here. Did I miss something with the memory expert? From what I listened to, she made zero excuses for Michelle. She got on the stand and testified to memory research which is her specialty. She did not discuss that in context of the Troconis interrogation at all. Or did I miss something?! The memory research is left for the jury to do with want they want in terms of applying it to this trial. Never once did she make any claims about Troconis’s memory or the truth of her stories. Why is everyone acting like she got up on stand and said “Michelle Troconis never lied and here’s why…” Everybody calm down.
Kind of complicated but she wrote a book on how some experts get personal feelings the defendant is definitely not guilty, she believes Traconis just forgot & mixed up timelines, not lieing. She stated this bout middle of testifying, prosecutors did their research knowing this lady has added to defense on some of the worst murderers & she basically always testifies for defense because she sees defendants getting thrown in prison a lot of times due to memory confusions, etc. which is true for many in prison that are not guilty but like Traconis & the serial sick murderers she has helped defense on,,,noooo.
She isn’t opining. She just spoke I generalities which is totally useless. Why did they even hire her? I would like to see the 48 pages of her Cv and see if she out recipes in there just to fill it up? She probably has lots of consulting, but didn’t get hired to testify as she is horrible.
.
This is not live
It's live real time and then they stream it after
The lady prosecutor is asking bad questions of the realtor lady.
All she needed to do was have her refer to the exhibit that SHOWS the times she reached out to FD on 5/24 and times FD finally responded.
The lady prosecutor is easily pulled off her game.
As soon as defens called the lady realtor to stand even I could anticipate the text messages betw her & FD would be at issue.
Come ON
Very weak evidence👎