If animals are dying because of polluted waters and you release the animals back in those waters they’re probably gonna die. Especially if it never got used to those waters like the wild parents did
their health slowly declining after first few days of release no doubt about it, that's why those experts always releasing them at 100% so they can have more tolerance of harsh condition before finally adapting or maybe ventures to the better environment.
if a species is endangered due to humans, we should try to fix our wrongdoings. just because we havent been able to do it well (sometimes) doesnt mean we should stop
I can understand helping animals that are endangered because of us as Humans, however sometimes there are some animals that are endangered and we are putting way to much effort in preserving them to the point we shouldn't really be bothering, more so when nature does not have a plan for them such as Koalas. Pandas, they are surviving because solely of pretty privileges.
Well unfortunately no wildlife today is unaffected by humanity, every creature is thriving or dying because of us one way or another. Maybe the creatures that started dying because of our conversation wasn't mean to be using this logic
And bro that thinking is also the part of the problem, we can't choose to save any particular species because we don't exactly understand their role in the ecosystem. Pandas might just be very crucial in some hidden form otherwise they wouldn't have existed for this long anyways
@@AneeshJonwal That is a good thought to think about, yes Nature isn't about "survival of the fittest" but a case of "survival of the good enough", but some species can get way to cozy to the point where, if we as humans go extinct, the animal go extinct. The Panda example, the only argument I heard was to maintain bamboo population yet bamboo is quite useful for construction, as well as being a seasoning threat so in a way that couldn't be the case. But then we as humans of course do dumb shit like bringing animals to places that have no business, going "oops" then the solution is to use the most inefficient method, IE setting up traps to catch invasive rabbits in Australia.
- Awe those baby sharks were so dang cute 😍 ❤. I do however believe that to completely bring in animals to their original environment, they should make sure *OTHER* populations of animals are thriving first so it won't make too much of a disturbance.
@@WoodlandT Only after the Sandy Hook parents have finally gotten their just compensation after his unutterably cruel and inflammatory libels, and stochastic attacks, against them and the memories of their forcibly departed children.
So, an entire swarm of crabs, at least once a year, covering the island, and the only idea is to get rid of them? Once a year, you have walking dinner, enough to feed a decent number of people, pear year, and you wanted to get rid of them? Intelligence.
Everyday on this Earth at least 25 species of animals go extinct. Everyday on this Earth. 25 new species are discovered. This has been happening ever since people have started to keep records
In Malaysia, efforts to save crocodiles from extinction have been successful, leading to a significant increase in their population. However, this surge has resulted in a rise in incidents where humans are attacked and eaten by crocodiles.
@@embush0 how about you swim specifically in resorts and specialised swimming areas i live in Libya and we have places specifically placed so that we dont get attacked by bullsharks stingrays ratfish that are highly venomous and the odd saltwater crocodile
From one perspective: humans are also repopulating and increasing which would inevitably lead to more incidents of many/any other predators, or viruses…
@@embush0 so we should kill a species because of something so natural, what's up with hunters excusing their behavior by saying that they are doing what other animals do, but then suddenly an animal eating an other animal is such a big thing ? Just make sure that the peoples don't live near those water instead of killing all this progress.
(It's now October 19, 2024), I don't know about you, but on TH-cam I get ads promoting voting for sports betting, and I would like to argue against that. Normally, I oppose legislation that prohibits a more or less victimless activity. However, Gambling is not quite victimless, and I can compromise my opposition. Gambling doesn't help anyone except the people who run the games. The winners get something, of course, but generally, someone's winnings don't compensate for their losses. Indeed, gambling games, including sports ones, are designed to take in more than they give out. It's often about half. IOW, If the gambling public bets 1,000 dollars, they only get back $500 in winnings, if that. In order to not be too restrictive, laws other than outright bans should be implemented. Perhaps not allowing advertisements for gambling would be a good compromise.
Almost every time in which people have trifled with plant and animal populations and location, whether it was exterminating or encouraging population growth, it has ended up in disaster. We are terrible at managing the biosphere.
I understand conservationists wor, but at the same time you are preventing the next generation of animals from rising. That is how it works. One dies because it couldn't hack it in the competition, others rise to take the place.
If an animal be ones extinct from unnatural human interference like overfishing, poaching, or by introducing an invasive species, then it messes up the entire ecosystem system. Look at Florida which is filled with invasive species that destroying land and killing the animals that already live there at an alarming rate.
I mean. Let nature take its course. You are absolutely right. Species go extinct, and other species take their place. Imagine if dinosaurs were alive today. No species love forever. Evolution is still a thing.
Humans throw that entire line of thinking straight out the windows.We are the reason for the current wave of extinctions and oyr conservation efforts are foolheardy at best.
Basically all the animals mentioned in this video were hunted to near extinction by humans… there is no animal on earth that can beat humans in competition. I get your point but it’s not a valid point in these situations. It’s almost always habit loss that causes a species to go extinct whether that’s humans making city’s or a volcano eruption, 881 species have gone extinct because of humans since the year 1500 and the last time we know of any going extinct for “natural” causes was during the ice age.
The animals that are dying off because of natural selection should be left to their fate. The animals that are dying because of us we probably shouldn't stand around and watch it happen.
Obviously trying to save some endangered animals is a good thing, but first, the cause of their extinction should be addressed; then you need to make sure the ecosystem can handle them back, and then you must gradually release them so a wave of change doesn’t mess things up even more.
Loosing animals that have survived for millions of years before humanity started the selective pressure that drives them extinct is a tragedy. Species like sea turtles, sharks, even coral have survived every event nature has tossed their way, there’s so much we can learn. Even with a “what’s in it for me?” Mindset theres breakthroughs in medicine and materials science all the time based on knowledge gained from biology.
No there was a crab shortage because china moved it's crab season up a month and caught them all before us. This used to start wars, and now you didn't even know about it.
How far do you take that, especially when its humankinds fault/greed have caused the issue. If you are on any medication for a health problem should we stop this and allow nature to take its progress ? your remark is illogical at best and stupid at worst.
This reminds me of that episode of Disney's Tarzan the series Seeds of Destruction, where things go from bad to worse, and to teach us to never mess with Mother Nature.
Those tiny frogs Should I have told someone if I saw one in Arizona around 2008 near dead horse ranch ? .... I swear that's the same little tiny guy I found near a stream when I was little
Hey, Steve, Tell researchers to induce fear from birth. The natural way to really live. When they are born they have to figure out how to stay alive right away. Lab grown do not. If any animal is to know true life that needs to be addressed. I believe that once that fear is introduced that then their survival instincts are activated and mating is part of that. Plus they tend to become close when hiding and close relations begin. It's just a thought. I don't even think you'll read this. Anyways, Love your stuff Brother! Love, Peace and Be Safe!
Why not only breed prey items? When it comes to oceans for example, Anchovies, sardines etc. basically animals closer to the bottom of the food chain to help everyone else. The only problem is you would also need to massively reduce commercial fishing for it to really have an impact.
Im struggling to understand the point of this video....with a title like that, and then listing examples where humans have decimates populations of animals and struggled to bring them back through extreme means and resources.... no thumbs up.
How will the sharks know how to naturally how to lay their egg pods in areas where they won’t die. Are they a species that mates for life or just mates with a new mate every year?
What happened? You don't see the problem? The problem is people are trying to play God and keeps messing up just leave nature alone and let it take care of itself after all it was doing just fine before human intervention
Yh but the problem began with humans intervention causing their extinction... How is it a problem for humans to attempt to fix something they initially caused? The animals wouldn't have gone extinct if it wasn't for humans in the first place. For example, the sharks at the beginning of the video. Only reason they're going extinct is because of human hunting. How about Rhinos? If humans weren't targeting the ivory then they wouldn't have been poached to a degree where they've gone extinct. If they died out in nature because they're ill-equipped for survival then sure you have a point. If they're dying out cause of humans hunting them, introducing invasive species or the destruction of natural habitats then I think it's more than fair to try and help them out. If you call helping them playing god then surely we've already been playing god by killing them off in the first place. The shark thing at the beginning I think was extremely fair. If you release the sharks into the wild and they still die out then it's not like there is any issue as they would have died out anyway if nothing was done. Only time I'd say no action should be done is if it is done by people who are unqualified to do so as they're most likely to introduce the species as an invasive one instead of their natural habitat
@user-em2nh2hh8m The problem is strategy not the goal. They need to ban fishing and enforce it. Some people in the US have even learned that attacking fishing vessels owned by enemy nations (like China) is legal during times of war. We need to remove the human effects like overfishing, pesticide run off from farms, sun screen pollution that is toxic to coral reefs, microplastics that they are now finding in the brains of sharks. You can chuck an animal into an environment as much as you want but it's no use if it dies immediately
@brittr1358 what's the problem with doing both? If the shark does die then it dies. But if it lives then you have an additional shark to repopulate. Do nothing then you have nothing, do something and you have a chance of accomplishing something. A chance of something is infinitely better than having a guarantee of nothing. If you remove the issue such as banning fishing, which they have, that doesn't fix the issue of how there are too few sharks which us leading them to become extinct from the not finding eachother. You can't leave it to their own devices after completely sabotaging the species. It's like asking someone to build you a PC in a week and they've destroyed all your parts and plans.
I think it's funny you think saving something that was already there is "playing god" but killing off species and destroying habitat that god made is fair? I think you need to rethink your philosophy on that
Great bustards are on Salisbury plane ( millitary fireing range ) this Is only a few miles away from me. I have heard they where highly prized for the table , but I've driven across the place and never seen one .a tank or armoured carrier is bound to peg one eventually and that might be a great opportunity to sample this delicious treat 😄
@@mosdeadly98send that Cat to the far east and after it's seasoned, marinated, and grilled and it's kittens raised in jars ask yourself again what qualifies as the most dangerous.
I never get why they don't sterilize predators they introduce into over populations. Sure, several thousand or million sterilization would suck, but would be regular steady work.
I assume it’s because most predators eat less often than their prey and have longer gestation periods so you need like 2-3 generations to get rid of the prey issue.
There were actually still Mammoths alive only 3,700 years ago, on a place called Wrangel Island. The rest died out 10,500 years ago at the end of the last ice age.
@@WASTHATABULLET I suspect mammoths can deal with modern temperatures, give it a generation and they will have adapted to have thinner furs or shed as needed. The problem is thye are so big they would have a massive impact on any ecosystem they are put in.
the night heron n human activity reduced the crab population by a lot i literally saw my first land crab this year but yes night herons are everywhere in bermuda
How depressing. :/ But thats the way of things, I guess. The bright side, if you can even call it that, is once humans disappear for whatever reason, nature will bounce back. There have been many extinction events over the lifespan of Earth, but life always bounced back.
Well, helping them one by one isn't going to do much. Deforestation and more people is the problem. But if you go into that topic, some will try to blame "The West" and excusing everybody else because of some type of colonization that happened before cars were built. So now they apparently have the "right" to do what they want ? Well maybe if we didn't let companies base their factories in questionable locations for profit (for the top brass) - which has happened since 1999. There's a reason for having the EU and the american version and that is to protect our markets. With rules.
What is it with the French and Frogs? Someone needs to tell them that these frogs won't grow big enough to eat. Amphibians are extremely sensitive to pollution, and until the pollution is removed from the environment, they will continue to die off, and in waterways, it is notoriously difficult to remove pollution. I truly hope that they can accomplish the reintroduction of the frogs into their former environment, but they disappeared for a reason, and sometime what we think we know isn't the same as what the real problem is because it's never one single thing that is responsible for the species' disappearance.
❤read revelations ❤ all the animals in the water and the water itself is poison and everything is dead..it's too late, it is written and literal ❤ we destroyed this beautiful majestic creation of God and there's a price to pay.
An ecosystem is, as the word implies, a "system”, and a very complex one, in which all the elements, i.e. the living beings, the animals and the plants, achieve a delicate balance.Tinker with one element, like exterminate a species or replace a lost one with another from a different system, and this balance is lost.
15:59 Surely these “high level of cannibalism” aren’t high enough to endanger a major endeavor to return them to nature; they are cannibalistic by nature! Especially when you consider that people could apply some of the strategies mentioned in 17:16…
Why? If you think we are the problem go ahead, be a pathfinder and be the first to go. Why do people think humans don't have the same right to live as some spotted minnow in an isolated pond in Lower Elbonia?
They leave out that we both cause and manage a reduction in invasive species. We have a massive amount of domesticated species including us who will die and cause methane blooms resulting in climate change and disease transfer between species. Plastic production and recycling and cellulose eating creatures are managed by us and micro-plastics won't go away when we do. The world will never return to a completely natural state.
If animals are dying because of polluted waters and you release the animals back in those waters they’re probably gonna die. Especially if it never got used to those waters like the wild parents did
their health slowly declining after first few days of release no doubt about it, that's why those experts always releasing them at 100% so they can have more tolerance of harsh condition before finally adapting or maybe ventures to the better environment.
Were you even watching the video? Watch it again, but this time VERY carefully. You will note that you're question had already been answered.
And yet they will live to lead the life of the prey they are intended to be. And those who can adapt and proliferate are not a useless endeavor
European zoos promise to keep endangered animals so they dont die out in the now polluted wilderness, but this is horrible too, of course
Overfishing by third world countries bro. Pollution has nothing to do with it.
if a species is endangered due to humans, we should try to fix our wrongdoings. just because we havent been able to do it well (sometimes) doesnt mean we should stop
If you bring back the Dodo in the uk you know some muppets going to want it for change to turkey or goose for Christmas dinner.
Dodo was on tropical islands not in the UK
@@cedhome7945 Yep, it's was only found on Mauritius, beside Madagascar
You lot forget we got dodos in the UK already man.....Rishi Suna🙃
“Crabs were everywhere” is a wild sentence
I can understand helping animals that are endangered because of us as Humans, however sometimes there are some animals that are endangered and we are putting way to much effort in preserving them to the point we shouldn't really be bothering, more so when nature does not have a plan for them such as Koalas.
Pandas, they are surviving because solely of pretty privileges.
Well unfortunately no wildlife today is unaffected by humanity, every creature is thriving or dying because of us one way or another. Maybe the creatures that started dying because of our conversation wasn't mean to be using this logic
And bro that thinking is also the part of the problem, we can't choose to save any particular species because we don't exactly understand their role in the ecosystem. Pandas might just be very crucial in some hidden form otherwise they wouldn't have existed for this long anyways
@@AneeshJonwal That is a good thought to think about, yes Nature isn't about "survival of the fittest" but a case of "survival of the good enough", but some species can get way to cozy to the point where, if we as humans go extinct, the animal go extinct.
The Panda example, the only argument I heard was to maintain bamboo population yet bamboo is quite useful for construction, as well as being a seasoning threat so in a way that couldn't be the case.
But then we as humans of course do dumb shit like bringing animals to places that have no business, going "oops" then the solution is to use the most inefficient method, IE setting up traps to catch invasive rabbits in Australia.
- Awe those baby sharks were so dang cute 😍 ❤. I do however believe that to completely bring in animals to their original environment, they should make sure *OTHER* populations of animals are thriving first so it won't make too much of a disturbance.
Chemicals in the water turning frogs gay. Another dollar into the "Alex Jones was right" jar!😂
Total in jar - $1
If I had to give you a dollar for every time Alex Jones was right; I would owe you about 1.5 bil.
❤😂
@@WoodlandT Only after the Sandy Hook parents have finally gotten their just compensation after his unutterably cruel and inflammatory libels, and stochastic attacks, against them and the memories of their forcibly departed children.
@@WoodlandTWell there was 9/11 and Bohemian Grove... So there's at least $3
@@MrSirlulzalot- the law disagrees
This has to be the best (D) channel there is on TH-cam the commentary is absolutely superb and the subjects are awesome
So, an entire swarm of crabs, at least once a year, covering the island, and the only idea is to get rid of them?
Once a year, you have walking dinner, enough to feed a decent number of people, pear year, and you wanted to get rid of them?
Intelligence.
They probably dug under infrastructure, over ate the other fisheries, killed bird eggs on the shore, and ate plants anywhere around the water.
Yes, and sell wood chippers to create the best planting soil ever…no brainer
Because maybe, just maybe, some crabs are inedible and poisonous.
@@izaakaz6863 There are several species of poisonous crabs.
That is one good treatment with either bicarbonate or vinegar from becoming edible.@@RayF6126
Everyday on this Earth at least 25 species of animals go extinct. Everyday on this Earth. 25 new species are discovered. This has been happening ever since people have started to keep records
You should watch David Attenborough: A Life On Our Planet and see if your still so lacking in knowledge
Giving frogs a blue chew to help mate is wild.
Oh God, you have been infected by AD's
five commercials in twenty minutes will drive me to extinction
In Malaysia, efforts to save crocodiles from extinction have been successful, leading to a significant increase in their population. However, this surge has resulted in a rise in incidents where humans are attacked and eaten by crocodiles.
That's okay cuz 1 it's rare 2 they are important to the environment
@@krakenmommy5169You can come and swim here and become part of the "environment" for crocodile.
@@embush0 how about you swim specifically in resorts and specialised swimming areas i live in Libya and we have places specifically placed so that we dont get attacked by bullsharks stingrays ratfish that are highly venomous and the odd saltwater crocodile
From one perspective: humans are also repopulating and increasing which would inevitably lead to more incidents of many/any other predators, or viruses…
@@embush0 so we should kill a species because of something so natural, what's up with hunters excusing their behavior by saying that they are doing what other animals do, but then suddenly an animal eating an other animal is such a big thing ? Just make sure that the peoples don't live near those water instead of killing all this progress.
(It's now October 19, 2024), I don't know about you, but on TH-cam I get ads promoting voting for sports betting, and I would like to argue against that. Normally, I oppose legislation that prohibits a more or less victimless activity. However, Gambling is not quite victimless, and I can compromise my opposition.
Gambling doesn't help anyone except the people who run the games. The winners get something, of course, but generally, someone's winnings don't compensate for their losses. Indeed, gambling games, including sports ones, are designed to take in more than they give out. It's often about half. IOW, If the gambling public bets 1,000 dollars, they only get back $500 in winnings, if that.
In order to not be too restrictive, laws other than outright bans should be implemented. Perhaps not allowing advertisements for gambling would be a good compromise.
Almost every time in which people have trifled with plant and animal populations and location, whether it was exterminating or encouraging population growth, it has ended up in disaster. We are terrible at managing the biosphere.
I understand conservationists wor, but at the same time you are preventing the next generation of animals from rising. That is how it works. One dies because it couldn't hack it in the competition, others rise to take the place.
If an animal be ones extinct from unnatural human interference like overfishing, poaching, or by introducing an invasive species, then it messes up the entire ecosystem system. Look at Florida which is filled with invasive species that destroying land and killing the animals that already live there at an alarming rate.
I mean. Let nature take its course.
You are absolutely right. Species go extinct, and other species take their place. Imagine if dinosaurs were alive today. No species love forever. Evolution is still a thing.
Humans throw that entire line of thinking straight out the windows.We are the reason for the current wave of extinctions and oyr conservation efforts are foolheardy at best.
Basically all the animals mentioned in this video were hunted to near extinction by humans… there is no animal on earth that can beat humans in competition. I get your point but it’s not a valid point in these situations. It’s almost always habit loss that causes a species to go extinct whether that’s humans making city’s or a volcano eruption, 881 species have gone extinct because of humans since the year 1500 and the last time we know of any going extinct for “natural” causes was during the ice age.
What if it's caused by an invasive species that shouldn't be in the area?
The animals that are dying off because of natural selection should be left to their fate.
The animals that are dying because of us we probably shouldn't stand around and watch it happen.
I agree unfortunately we are the reason for many going extinct. Except the panda that's not on humans
13:36 Wait. So it's ok for indigenous people to make a species go extinct? !?
Yes, get with the program.
Great action for saving animals
Obviously trying to save some endangered animals is a good thing, but first, the cause of their extinction should be addressed; then you need to make sure the ecosystem can handle them back, and then you must gradually release them so a wave of change doesn’t mess things up even more.
"IT'S OVER. NEVER INTERFERE WITH EXTINCTION"
Since much of the extinction is caused by humans it’s not natural.
animals have been going extinct for millions of years its a basic of life. sometimes things just need to phase out.
When was the last time a species went extinct for natural causes?
@@Fiercepower420 the polar bear
@@Fiercepower420 Panda, but it's a little different....
@@WATOP_VIDEO Would you say 'Extinction' is the back end of 'Evolution'?
Loosing animals that have survived for millions of years before humanity started the selective pressure that drives them extinct is a tragedy. Species like sea turtles, sharks, even coral have survived every event nature has tossed their way, there’s so much we can learn. Even with a “what’s in it for me?” Mindset theres breakthroughs in medicine and materials science all the time based on knowledge gained from biology.
No there was a crab shortage because china moved it's crab season up a month and caught them all before us. This used to start wars, and now you didn't even know about it.
Yup that's exactly what I was gonna say. Was a Problem lol😂
Just let nature run its course
How far do you take that, especially when its humankinds fault/greed have caused the issue. If you are on any medication for a health problem should we stop this and allow nature to take its progress ? your remark is illogical at best and stupid at worst.
I can tell you went to an Ivy league university 🤔
The Thylacine is back baby. Nature always wins.
Do you have a source for that I couldn’t find something validated
No it isn't.
@@whitegold2960There is no verifiable evidence of its existence
This reminds me of that episode of Disney's Tarzan the series Seeds of Destruction, where things go from bad to worse, and to teach us to never mess with Mother Nature.
Important Topic ❤ ! Extinction of insects,birds & animals could lead to ecological disbalance, adversely affecting human beings !
do i look like i care if humans die idc cuz theyre bad
Dont worry bout this channel, WATOP is just a corporate content farm
Those tiny frogs
Should I have told someone if I saw one in Arizona around 2008 near dead horse ranch ? .... I swear that's the same little tiny guy I found near a stream when I was little
Hey, Steve, Tell researchers to induce fear from birth. The natural way to really live. When they are born they have to figure out how to stay alive right away. Lab grown do not. If any animal is to know true life that needs to be addressed. I believe that once that fear is introduced that then their survival instincts are activated and mating is part of that. Plus they tend to become close when hiding and close relations begin. It's just a thought. I don't even think you'll read this. Anyways, Love your stuff Brother!
Love, Peace and Be Safe!
Im pretty sure this is a corporate content farm and steve is just voicing over a script he didn't make
Why not only breed prey items? When it comes to oceans for example, Anchovies, sardines etc. basically animals closer to the bottom of the food chain to help everyone else. The only problem is you would also need to massively reduce commercial fishing for it to really have an impact.
no solution is perfect
@@Eraz the real intervention was everything we've done that's caused these species to become endangered or extinct.
Sea otters also steal surf boards.
not the point
The problems are always caused by the proliferation of us.
Im struggling to understand the point of this video....with a title like that, and then listing examples where humans have decimates populations of animals and struggled to bring them back through extreme means and resources.... no thumbs up.
0:27 My favorite part ❤vnit ☕️ Cheers 😂
People are the problem period.
Humans are the best thing that ever happened to nature.
How will the sharks know how to naturally how to lay their egg pods in areas where they won’t die. Are they a species that mates for life or just mates with a new mate every year?
Baby shark, do do do
bring back the Dodo
Bring back the micro raptors
Your C.T.A for The LIKE Button is my FAV😇
I find it pretty cringe. Combined with the quality of videos and the "Facts" in them declining, I now hesitate to watch the channel.
Who would have thought that they created Viagra for frogs... Isn't science amazing
What happened? You don't see the problem? The problem is people are trying to play God and keeps messing up just leave nature alone and let it take care of itself after all it was doing just fine before human intervention
Yh but the problem began with humans intervention causing their extinction...
How is it a problem for humans to attempt to fix something they initially caused?
The animals wouldn't have gone extinct if it wasn't for humans in the first place.
For example, the sharks at the beginning of the video. Only reason they're going extinct is because of human hunting.
How about Rhinos? If humans weren't targeting the ivory then they wouldn't have been poached to a degree where they've gone extinct.
If they died out in nature because they're ill-equipped for survival then sure you have a point.
If they're dying out cause of humans hunting them, introducing invasive species or the destruction of natural habitats then I think it's more than fair to try and help them out.
If you call helping them playing god then surely we've already been playing god by killing them off in the first place.
The shark thing at the beginning I think was extremely fair.
If you release the sharks into the wild and they still die out then it's not like there is any issue as they would have died out anyway if nothing was done.
Only time I'd say no action should be done is if it is done by people who are unqualified to do so as they're most likely to introduce the species as an invasive one instead of their natural habitat
@user-em2nh2hh8m
The problem is strategy not the goal. They need to ban fishing and enforce it. Some people in the US have even learned that attacking fishing vessels owned by enemy nations (like China) is legal during times of war.
We need to remove the human effects like overfishing, pesticide run off from farms, sun screen pollution that is toxic to coral reefs, microplastics that they are now finding in the brains of sharks. You can chuck an animal into an environment as much as you want but it's no use if it dies immediately
@brittr1358 what's the problem with doing both?
If the shark does die then it dies.
But if it lives then you have an additional shark to repopulate.
Do nothing then you have nothing, do something and you have a chance of accomplishing something.
A chance of something is infinitely better than having a guarantee of nothing.
If you remove the issue such as banning fishing, which they have, that doesn't fix the issue of how there are too few sharks which us leading them to become extinct from the not finding eachother.
You can't leave it to their own devices after completely sabotaging the species.
It's like asking someone to build you a PC in a week and they've destroyed all your parts and plans.
I think it's funny you think saving something that was already there is "playing god" but killing off species and destroying habitat that god made is fair? I think you need to rethink your philosophy on that
Except hedgehogs, always feed the hedgehogs.
Maybe start with the disapering pray fish that are over fished before releasing predators back into the wild.
I'll head down to Saint-Constant or Mont St-Bruno this weekend to find some chorus frogs lmao
Great bustards are on Salisbury plane ( millitary fireing range ) this Is only a few miles away from me. I have heard they where highly prized for the table , but I've driven across the place and never seen one .a tank or armoured carrier is bound to peg one eventually and that might be a great opportunity to sample this delicious treat 😄
People never learn, I guess they didn't understand what Jurassic park wanted to convey.
You know what the most dangerous animal in the world is? A human.
pretty sure by that logic its a cat.
@@mosdeadly98who domesticated the cats?
@@mosdeadly98send that Cat to the far east and after it's seasoned, marinated, and grilled and it's kittens raised in jars ask yourself again what qualifies as the most dangerous.
Cats domesticated themselves but humans breed them for every environmental variations @gage1bradford198
@@Fiercepower420 Cats
Continue saving endangered species!!!
Aaaand... the cover picture?
I never get why they don't sterilize predators they introduce into over populations. Sure, several thousand or million sterilization would suck, but would be regular steady work.
I assume it’s because most predators eat less often than their prey and have longer gestation periods so you need like 2-3 generations to get rid of the prey issue.
So crank out 3 generations of predators who are neutered.
Ever see jurassic park?
I don't know what group does more damage. Environmentalists or Animal Rights.
Real animal lovers leave animals alone and in the wild
Bring back mammoth.
There were actually still Mammoths alive only 3,700 years ago, on a place called Wrangel Island. The rest died out 10,500 years ago at the end of the last ice age.
It would be torture to do this now. The world's hotter than before. Maybe with thinner hair?
@@WASTHATABULLET so a elephant?
@@WASTHATABULLET I suspect mammoths can deal with modern temperatures, give it a generation and they will have adapted to have thinner furs or shed as needed. The problem is thye are so big they would have a massive impact on any ecosystem they are put in.
Did anyone else have the feeling that Kermit the frog was narrating the video to raise awareness on frogs? 😂
Can you raise them in the desert
the night heron n human activity reduced the crab population by a lot i literally saw my first land crab this year but yes night herons are everywhere in bermuda
Mongooses look scary
Yes let's save the animals and while we do that build giant subdivisions of houses destroying hundreds of acres of woods..... just so smart.
Only the fittest of the fittest will survive!
How depressing. :/ But thats the way of things, I guess. The bright side, if you can even call it that, is once humans disappear for whatever reason, nature will bounce back. There have been many extinction events over the lifespan of Earth, but life always bounced back.
With zero context, that title can be interpreted horribly.
I flipped the phone to hit that like button and now i hand soap on my phone...
Well, helping them one by one isn't going to do much. Deforestation and more people is the problem. But if you go into that topic, some will try to blame "The West" and excusing everybody else because of some type of colonization that happened before cars were built. So now they apparently have the "right" to do what they want ? Well maybe if we didn't let companies base their factories in questionable locations for profit (for the top brass) - which has happened since 1999. There's a reason for having the EU and the american version and that is to protect our markets. With rules.
What is it with the French and Frogs? Someone needs to tell them that these frogs won't grow big enough to eat. Amphibians are extremely sensitive to pollution, and until the pollution is removed from the environment, they will continue to die off, and in waterways, it is notoriously difficult to remove pollution. I truly hope that they can accomplish the reintroduction of the frogs into their former environment, but they disappeared for a reason, and sometime what we think we know isn't the same as what the real problem is because it's never one single thing that is responsible for the species' disappearance.
We are so good
❤read revelations ❤ all the animals in the water and the water itself is poison and everything is dead..it's too late, it is written and literal ❤ we destroyed this beautiful majestic creation of God and there's a price to pay.
nature finds a way
Save endangered humans.
"Stop Saving Endangered Animals!!"
Dwl
Jamaican?
I was taught survival of the fittest a throughout my schooling days. Maybe my teachers were wrong
It depends on the context. Natural selection does happen, and always has. Humans have just messed it up.
15:35 looks like a giant version of a baby brine shrimp hatchery that i use lmao
Can you bring that species back elsewhere the birds in the USA.
That's not Bermuda. Bermuda didn't have a crab problem and it doesn't have buses like that.
I've been here for 38 years they call me doo.doo bird
Make it balance , predator and pray . Food chain
i am first
Save the endangered but help others to not become endangered because of it so just don't overdo it
Talk to the Asians about all the killing of Sharkey for SHARK FIN SOUP. TOO CRUEL
😢
It’s actually delicious.
An ecosystem is, as the word implies, a "system”, and a very complex one, in which all the elements, i.e. the living beings, the animals and the plants, achieve a delicate balance.Tinker with one element, like exterminate a species or replace a lost one with another from a different system, and this balance is lost.
❤
Watch the numbers of the ones u helped to possibly reduce their numbers if getting out of control
9:19 they need moonlight
Make those animal a pet, they gonna thrive, cause human gonna release unwanted pet and those pet kinda a problem.
Where is the real Steve 😢
15:59 Surely these “high level of cannibalism” aren’t high enough to endanger a major endeavor to return them to nature; they are cannibalistic by nature! Especially when you consider that people could apply some of the strategies mentioned in 17:16…
close call....🙏
Thank people for the majority of the respincibilty
Im from the UK and didn't even know they existed. It's sad we really don't have any space for them.
Those who automatically viewed this video
👇👈
someone need to run a simulation to see what the impact of humans being extinct does to every animal, insect, plants, and the planet itself.
Why? If you think we are the problem go ahead, be a pathfinder and be the first to go.
Why do people think humans don't have the same right to live as some spotted minnow in an isolated pond in Lower Elbonia?
People have already done this. There's a book called the world without us and a virtual series called Life after People.
They leave out that we both cause and manage a reduction in invasive species. We have a massive amount of domesticated species including us who will die and cause methane blooms resulting in climate change and disease transfer between species. Plastic production and recycling and cellulose eating creatures are managed by us and micro-plastics won't go away when we do. The world will never return to a completely natural state.
@@patrickdurham8393 "simulation" dip shit. And thanks already tried that several times but friends and family stop me before i can finish the deed.
@@patrickdurham8393 "simulation" dumbass
who looks out for all the species? So we get films about scarcity issues.
Why the video is named like that ? This guy haven't give a single reason why not save species on danger
So what they are doing is introduceing invasive species
Wow 5 min ago
All these animals going extinct…when are the next ones coming out?
Stop saving endangered animals
it's like you are saying stop saving people from any disease
Does anybody know what other channels this guy has?