sir @ 4:21 why flux phi 2 will interact with current i 1 and flux phi 1 will interact with current i 2 ? in machine, we have studied that fluxes corresponding to currents i 1 and i 2 will interact with each other to produce the torque!
Respected sir, i think 'w' got missed in the derivation timeline 6:40 -7:02. If we take it then it will come in final expression of resultant force time line 10:02-10:33.If 'w' is present in expression of resultant force then how can we say that resultant force is independent of frequency..? Plz explain sir...
Sir in the timeline from 3:50 to 4:00 U've just said that ∅1 interacts with i2 and ∅2 interacts with i1 ? Why is this necessary that ∅1should interacts with i2 not with i1 Bcoz torque will also produce if ∅1 interacts with i1?? Then why we take that ∅1 interacts with i2??
@@_sooyaaa_2002 I think that since I1 surrounding flux1 has two opposite direction thus resultant torque due to interaction of flux1 with both direction of current becomes zero. However only one direction of current I2 links with flux1 thus resultant torque occurs due to interaction between flux1 and I2....its my thinking...sir will confirm whether it is correct or not.
Sir agar aap hindhi language use krte videos me to mai aap ka channel v subscribe krta and videos v watch krta hindhi language sab ko samz lagti hai aur english kisi kisi ko . 🙏🏻 sorry
![The Wall Song ร้องข้ามกำแพง | EP.215 | พาเวล นเรศ - พูห์ กฤติน | 17 ต.ค. 67 [1/5]](http://i.ytimg.com/vi/IUzrjuf60P4/mqdefault.jpg)
So thankful to u sir lots of explanation. Lucky to found u on net.
Sir your most of the video clarify my all doubt 👍
sir @ 4:21 why flux phi 2 will interact with current i 1 and flux phi 1 will interact with current i 2 ?
in machine, we have studied that fluxes corresponding to currents i 1 and i 2 will interact with each other to produce the torque!
Respected sir, i think 'w' got missed in the derivation timeline 6:40 -7:02. If we take it then it will come in final expression of resultant force time line 10:02-10:33.If 'w' is present in expression of resultant force then how can we say that resultant force is independent of frequency..?
Plz explain sir...
Assume frequency is constant
Sir differentiating sinwt w. r. t dt we get wcoswt. But u have given coswt. Y sir
sir why flux1 doesnt interact with i1 and flux2 doesnt interact with i2....?
@@lecturesinelectricaleng I didn't get it sir....can you suggest me some video link.
Sir why induced voltage lags behind flux by 90
How the reset to pickup ratio depend on the air gap?
thanks a lot sir..
It all most 2 years but still use full
Thank you sir. Well explained
Sir in the timeline from 3:50 to 4:00
U've just said that ∅1 interacts with i2 and ∅2 interacts with i1 ?
Why is this necessary that ∅1should interacts with i2 not with i1
Bcoz torque will also produce if ∅1 interacts with i1??
Then why we take that ∅1 interacts with i2??
@@lecturesinelectricaleng
Sir what's tge reason behind it that ∅1 does not produce torque on interaction with i1?
@@_sooyaaa_2002 I think that since I1 surrounding flux1 has two opposite direction thus resultant torque due to interaction of flux1 with both direction of current becomes zero. However only one direction of current I2 links with flux1 thus resultant torque occurs due to interaction between flux1 and I2....its my thinking...sir will confirm whether it is correct or not.
Well explained sir 😊
@@lecturesinelectricaleng don't say thanks sir, you are doing much more for us..
Thank you sir
Good
Time line from13:05 to 13:24
But how the reset to pickup ratio vary on airgap?
Thank you
Sir agar aap hindhi language use krte videos me to mai aap ka channel v subscribe krta and videos v watch krta hindhi language sab ko samz lagti hai aur english kisi kisi ko . 🙏🏻 sorry
I hate terrible english speakers. I would delete this if i were the speaker.
he is not speaking english
then why r u watching it? just leave.