The Failure of Santa Fe Skyway

แชร์
ฝัง
  • เผยแพร่เมื่อ 10 ก.ย. 2024

ความคิดเห็น • 378

  • @brianbobcat
    @brianbobcat 2 ปีที่แล้ว +229

    It's super interesting to look back on how government tried to keep companies from being vertically integrated, while now a days we have Amazon that controls literally every aspect of the company. Amazon has their own airline, planes, trucks, delivery vehicle and people, warehouses, cargo containers, and even rents out whole ships. Only thing they don't own is a railroad.

    • @13stalag13
      @13stalag13 2 ปีที่แล้ว +27

      yet!

    • @krozareq
      @krozareq 2 ปีที่แล้ว +27

      Don't forget they own most cloud computing too.

    • @howardkerr8174
      @howardkerr8174 2 ปีที่แล้ว +24

      @@krozareq
      Actually, cloud computing is Amazon's major source of revenue at the moment and the foreseeable future.
      Personally, I find it extremely disturbing that the Pentagon came EXTREMELY close to awarding this mammoth conglomerate a contract for cloud services.

    • @RCAvhstape
      @RCAvhstape 2 ปีที่แล้ว +4

      More disturbing is that the modern tech giants like Amazon and Google do not even consider themselves "American" companies and will gladly do business with horrible overseas regimes for enough money. In their day companies like Santa Fe were staffed with patriotic war vets or their relatives, companies like Amazon are staffed by tech geeks brainwashed at college to abstain from military service and to believe that America is racist and backwards, while their bosses are hideously rich and powerful.

    • @MyKharli
      @MyKharli 2 ปีที่แล้ว

      @@RCAvhstape What bit of racist and backwards is wrong , have you seen your cities poor areas ! unless its a sneaky ironic post !

  • @Reed81315
    @Reed81315 2 ปีที่แล้ว +321

    This guy is a true TH-cam historian. Content is the gold bar, narration doesn't put me to sleep, visuals are better than history or discovery channel. Just a great channel. Wishing you many subs

    • @copper7136
      @copper7136 2 ปีที่แล้ว +14

      How his channel doesn’t have at least a million subscribers is mind boggling

    • @DreitTheDarkDragon
      @DreitTheDarkDragon 2 ปีที่แล้ว +9

      @@copper7136 For me this is a little like Technology Connections. I'm sure people will come if somebody pushes this channel to them a little :)

    • @peterdibble
      @peterdibble  2 ปีที่แล้ว +24

      Much appreciated!

    • @madchocolettechip2397
      @madchocolettechip2397 2 ปีที่แล้ว +7

      he is underrated because mostly unknown as we like this channel we need to share its fabulous content to suscitate more views in order to satisfy the algorithm and gave the guy behind it and the people who help him the recognition they deserve

    • @JanJaapBats
      @JanJaapBats 2 ปีที่แล้ว

      absolutely agree!

  • @TrainMaster26
    @TrainMaster26 2 ปีที่แล้ว +190

    Its really interesting how railroads were turned down so frequently to join the air industry. I think Santa Fe Skyway could have become a big player in the air freight industry if they were allowed to become common carriers.

    • @Kishanth.J
      @Kishanth.J 2 ปีที่แล้ว +7

      I know CN and CP tried to enter the Airline business, do you know other example?

    • @sirmetaladon
      @sirmetaladon 2 ปีที่แล้ว +6

      I wonder if the ATB was right, in the end. That line at the end about how the ATSF was worth more than the entire air freight industry was spooky, not the least of which because railroads are notorious for trying to bury competition once they get a hold on things. In an alternate reality, this would be the tipping point where home-grown common carriers went extinct, to be subducted by railroad-backed giants.

    • @TrainMaster26
      @TrainMaster26 2 ปีที่แล้ว +6

      @@sirmetaladon Maybe, but then again, Santa Fe had nearly 100 years of experience. So it isnt that hard to see why they made more money.

    • @jamesburns2232
      @jamesburns2232 2 ปีที่แล้ว +4

      My Dad worked for the Post Office for 40 years. He said: "There were many ways to save money at the United States Postal Service, but the USPS always chose the politically correct solution over the better and cheaper one."

    • @valvlog4665
      @valvlog4665 2 ปีที่แล้ว +8

      They may have become the forerunner to FedEx. Over night service between LA and SF, and CHI and NYC. We'll never know.

  • @CallmeDaBreeze1971
    @CallmeDaBreeze1971 2 ปีที่แล้ว +35

    I work in the air freight Industry. I can only imagine what my Industry would like today had the ATSF been allowed to continue air freight service.

  • @emdxemdx
    @emdxemdx 2 ปีที่แล้ว +35

    It’s interesting to note that in Canada, both the Canadian National and Canadian Pacific had their own airlines (Trans-Canada Airlines → Air Canada & Canadian Pacific Airlines → CP Air).
    And during the 1960’s, Penn Central got nailed by the ICC for illegally operating an executive private jet charter service…

  • @theminipetabyte4610
    @theminipetabyte4610 2 ปีที่แล้ว +72

    Absolutely wonderful how the maps featured show the Santa-Fe Railroad Network beneath all the routes and flights shown to highlight their overlay.

  • @mackpines
    @mackpines 2 ปีที่แล้ว +52

    I knew Santa Fe had tug boats and train ferries but I never knew they tried to get into the airline industry.
    Very informative video.

  • @jeffbuckles
    @jeffbuckles 2 ปีที่แล้ว +76

    I've tried watching _other_ documentaries on youtube. I swear the longest clip on some of them is no more than two seconds, with most 1 to 1.5. There's no time to LOOK at anything without constantly pausing and breaking up the audio. The frenetic pacing they use can be very frustrating.
    I have never felt that frustration watching your videos, and I think that's one reason I enjoy them so much.
    Thank you for not treating us like sugar-buzzed three-year-olds.

    • @peterdibble
      @peterdibble  2 ปีที่แล้ว +18

      😄 Thank you, Jeff! That sort of editing can drive me crazy too.

    • @wintersbattleofbands1144
      @wintersbattleofbands1144 2 ปีที่แล้ว +8

      @@peterdibble People do all sorts of stuff that's an Editing 101 no-no. Overlays with spelling and punctuation mistakes, or are not up long enough to actually read (the rule is, the average reader should be able to read it TWICE. yup.). Nice to see well researched and edited material here.

    • @RobbieSongwriter
      @RobbieSongwriter 2 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      Worst are most military documentaries, which show MANY clips that are short because otherwise you'd recognize that it is the wrong plane, tank or whatever in the clip or completely unrelated battle footage and you see clips repeated MULTIPLE times. The BEST war documentaries available are by Montemayor, who uses simple animations and authentic clips to give you a CLEAR understanding of important battles. Pearl Harbor, Coral Sea and 3 part Midway give clarity to these major events in history.

  • @xXRedTheDragonXx
    @xXRedTheDragonXx 2 ปีที่แล้ว +57

    I totally agree with Santa Fe on this one, they should've been allowed to fly. It really feels like the government introducing the law that said that applicants under review could operate as common carriers except if they're already a railroad was the final nail in their coffin. They were singled-out, and it really felt like the US Government overstepped their bounds here. Imagine the innovation that we could've had if their plans had come to be... They seemed so forward thinking and willing to expand in a good way.

    • @wintersbattleofbands1144
      @wintersbattleofbands1144 2 ปีที่แล้ว +9

      Yup. Today, we see DHL, UPS, FedEx all operating airplanes and trucks... Why not combine with rail for a seamless and less expensive service.

    • @larrybrennan1463
      @larrybrennan1463 2 ปีที่แล้ว +7

      The Federal government had been hostile to the railroad industry since the Wilson administration.

    • @PRH123
      @PRH123 2 ปีที่แล้ว +5

      FedEx’s launch in 1973 was made possible by changing the relevant air carrier legislation, without that the business could not have been launched, they also would have been consigned to essentially air taxi operations

    • @xBINARYGODx
      @xBINARYGODx 2 ปีที่แล้ว

      lots of cargo does ship on rails, just no generally anything you ship, because no, it would not be economical, or rather, it might be if that rail was not be put to better use transporting things that you generally don't want to be transported on busy roads. The split is almost firm or logical, but its exists.
      that said, I know amtrack (etc.) does some regular shipping, but mostly your packages are truck with a side of air.

    • @chemech
      @chemech 2 ปีที่แล้ว +2

      @@larrybrennan1463 And the top bureaucrats at the time of denying Santa Fe were under the Truman administration, which was a continuation of the FDR administration, which was a reincarnation of the Wilson administration...
      Looking back with historical perspective, it was a long shot gamble by Santa Fe to try to get CAA licensing to operate...

  • @brandonbloomquist3267
    @brandonbloomquist3267 2 ปีที่แล้ว +25

    At 2 minutes in, that setup has me feeling like they attempted a way too early version of Amazon's shipping operation.

    • @rhuephus
      @rhuephus 2 ปีที่แล้ว

      ha ha ...Amazon does not have a railroad

  • @EannaButler
    @EannaButler 2 ปีที่แล้ว +8

    "Flying over two million miles, without a single incident" - wow.
    Thanks for a great upload.. Subbed...

  • @joshroller9449
    @joshroller9449 2 ปีที่แล้ว +11

    It's incredible how the country post WWII turned its back on railroads. While policies can and have changed in many sectors - simple evolution - if FedEx wanted to buy/start a railroad, I bet they'd be allowed. Or if BNSF - Santa Fe's successor, wanted to start an airline, I bet they'd be allowed, too.

    • @ronniewall1481
      @ronniewall1481 2 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      THE ELITE ARE WEIRD.
      AND EVIL

    • @rhuephus
      @rhuephus 2 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      ha ha .. Buffet does not like airline stocks .. the odds of him starting his own airline is almost zero

    • @WesternOhioInterurbanHistory
      @WesternOhioInterurbanHistory ปีที่แล้ว

      Burlington Northern did

  • @Uncle_Fred
    @Uncle_Fred 2 ปีที่แล้ว +58

    Another great one. Imagine this level of anti-monopolistic oversight from the federal government today.

    • @J-1410
      @J-1410 2 ปีที่แล้ว +13

      I don't really think it was anti-monopolistic, more so lobbyist power.

    • @iannarita9816
      @iannarita9816 2 ปีที่แล้ว +5

      The real problem with regulation was it was a lot easier to stop something then to start. When the transportation industry was (at least partially) deregulated, transport companies really took off.

    • @blackhawk7r221
      @blackhawk7r221 2 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      All about lobbyists greasing palms

    • @tim3172
      @tim3172 ปีที่แล้ว

      @@iannarita9816 Stop something then to start?
      Isn't everything stopped and then you start?

  • @carlhaluss
    @carlhaluss 2 ปีที่แล้ว +20

    Absolutely one of the most interesting videos I have seen in a long time. Especially since I previously had no idea about Santa Fe Skyway, and it's many innovations. Top notch reporting and content. Thank you!

  • @robertkelly8106
    @robertkelly8106 2 ปีที่แล้ว +8

    Excellent video, shining the spotlight on a little-known piece of Santa Fe history. As it happens, Santa Fe was not the only North American railroad to go into the airline business. Canadian Pacific formed Canadian Pacific Airlines (which carried freight and passengers) in 1942 and operated until 1987 when it was merged into Canadian Airlines until that airline was absorbed into Air Canada in 2001. CP Air, as it came to be called, joined the railroad, CP Ships and CP Hotels as a comprehensive transportation company. While the Canadian government did not deny CP a license as the US did ATSF, it did limit which routes CP Air could fly, protecting Trans-Canada Air (ancestor of Air Canada) on the most lucrative routes. CP then pioneered routes from Vancouver to Asia and the Pacific as well as cities in Europe not served by TCA. In the US, CP served major cities on the West Coast from their operations center in Vancouver.

    • @shnorth888
      @shnorth888 2 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      Fun fact Canadian National controlled TCA and up to 1978 successor Air Canada, when in that year AC became a full fledge crown corp which was privatized in 1987

  • @dustbowlhammer7119
    @dustbowlhammer7119 2 ปีที่แล้ว +5

    I bet Santa Fe would have become quite an airline! I never knew this before, great story!

  • @andxblink
    @andxblink 2 ปีที่แล้ว +7

    Your videos are some of the best on TH-cam. Both in content selection and production quality. I greatly enjoy your work and thank you for that.

  • @RD2564
    @RD2564 2 ปีที่แล้ว +13

    You've put a lot of effort into these excellent videos Peter, well done.

  • @hoscalerailfan
    @hoscalerailfan 2 ปีที่แล้ว +3

    It's funny how Pan AM went the opposite direction (Well known Airline to Railroad) and lasted longer than a well known Railroad becoming an Airline.

  • @tylers6709
    @tylers6709 2 ปีที่แล้ว +18

    You do a wonderful job! This is a very interesting story that i would have never known about. I really enjoy what you do, and how you visually show what is happening. Also i would add that i especially appreciate the train content! Any further train videos would be awesome!

    • @peterdibble
      @peterdibble  2 ปีที่แล้ว +3

      Thanks a lot! I like to mix up the subject matter, but there are always more railroad history topics to explore. :)

  • @ninjasonmylawn25
    @ninjasonmylawn25 2 ปีที่แล้ว +2

    I just discovered this channel today and I gotta say I'm really impressed. The production value is great but the topics are well researched and accurate which is the most important factor for me. Excellent work! I look forward to exploring your library.

  • @jonwebb2300
    @jonwebb2300 2 ปีที่แล้ว +5

    Great video. A huge corporation at the time like Santa Fe started what could easily be a substantial air freight carrier and augmented by one of the largest railroad companies is a strategic stroke of genius that indeed would do the public at large a huge service at reasonable cost and efficiency. What an incredible shame that the US government would destroy this.

  • @kaifreeman294
    @kaifreeman294 2 ปีที่แล้ว +4

    Very interesting story, this reminds me of how Pan Am was once a "BIG" top airliner back in the day but now it's being used for rail freight service.

    • @rhuephus
      @rhuephus 2 ปีที่แล้ว

      how is that possible when they CEASED operations in 1991 ????

    • @amfm889
      @amfm889 2 ปีที่แล้ว

      @@rhuephus A small New England rail company bought the brand name, and slapped it on their railroad.

  • @sammagictv
    @sammagictv 2 ปีที่แล้ว +3

    This channel deserves more attention. Fantastic video, as always

  • @Bratsbergbanen1
    @Bratsbergbanen1 2 ปีที่แล้ว +7

    Hi Peter! This was very interesting for me as a train buff, and especially as a Santa Fe enthusiast. I would really encourage you to write a book about this subject (as well as the combined cross-country train and airline passenger service they had). I'm sure it would be a big hit among both air transport and railroad afficianados.

  • @ralphdoggie
    @ralphdoggie 2 ปีที่แล้ว +2

    Truly excellent in all respects -- story structure and details, graphics, appropriate video clips, and even the section titles.

  • @MovieMakingMan
    @MovieMakingMan 2 ปีที่แล้ว +2

    Excellent video. It was very interesting. Thanks!

  • @joeman1437
    @joeman1437 2 ปีที่แล้ว +11

    Classy editing, a variety of topics across all your videos, informative narration, very nicely done overall I must say. Seeing as this is the first time I can recall seeing your content, I must say I'm rather impressed and I look forward to checking out more. You've earned my sub, along with many others today I'm sure.

    • @peterdibble
      @peterdibble  2 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      Thank you and welcome aboard!

  • @johnopalko5223
    @johnopalko5223 2 ปีที่แล้ว +8

    Well, Peter, you did it again. You don't upload often but, when you do, it's always been worth the wait. Obviously, your emphasis is on quality rather then quantity. Would that more TH-camrs followed your example.

  • @chicagotypewriter2094
    @chicagotypewriter2094 2 ปีที่แล้ว +3

    Your channel's quality is simply astounding, a true hidden gem amongst the riffraff and rubbish on TH-cam! This quality is near unparalleled and that thumbnail is great too! I'm so glad I found it!!!

  • @pauliedweasel
    @pauliedweasel 2 ปีที่แล้ว +2

    Thanks you for a presentation on Santa Fe Skyway, I had seen various short articles about this over the years but nothing in-depth like yours.
    In April of 1995 after a 22 year career with Hewlett-Packard came to an end I had the great privilege of working for the Santa Fe Railway as a telecommunications technician before that dark day five and a half months later in September of that same year when we merged with that patchwork of a railroad the Burlington Northern to become the BNSF which is currently owned by Warren Buffet’s Berkshire Hathaway Holdings. We Santa Fe people often referred to the new organization as the Big Nothing So Far of the Butt Nugget Santa Fe.

  • @thomasjacques5286
    @thomasjacques5286 2 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    What a great history lesson this long-time USAF Logistician wasn't aware of. The politics of BIG government and MONEY. Thank you.

  • @daviddunsmore103
    @daviddunsmore103 2 ปีที่แล้ว +5

    Great quality documentary! Excellent use of maps and beautiful vintage color footage at appropriate times, detailed research with well selected quotations, and upbeat period music too!
    I give this a hearty A+ all around! 😎

  • @ShainAndrews
    @ShainAndrews 2 ปีที่แล้ว +51

    I believe it was not nearly as common to challenge the government back then as it is today. I believe they had a good case.. one probably worthy of taking all the way to the Supreme Court if necessary. On the flip side what if they were allowed in that market space. What would they be today? Would they have turned into some version of our current tech giants that short of complete abstinence individuals can not escape?

    • @J-1410
      @J-1410 2 ปีที่แล้ว +8

      They may be SFSP or SFSPBN(Santa Fe Southern Pacific Burlington Northern). Probably just the "winner" of the countless mergers of the 1970s and 1980s of railroads, owned by Bershire Hathaway today.

    • @peterdibble
      @peterdibble  2 ปีที่แล้ว +21

      These are the sort of questions that were going through my head as I put this together. There were strong arguments for letting Santa Fe move forward, but it's also not hard to imagine them growing into an Amazon situation.

    • @pseudonymous1382
      @pseudonymous1382 2 ปีที่แล้ว +3

      This question also has a converse that was highlighted by one of the forward-thinking executives in this video: during the 70s, many railroads were going bankrupt due to much of their customer base switching from rail to trucking for transportation instead. It's not unfounded to think that if Santa Fe -- or other railroads for that matter -- had managed to operate a successful air freight business, that those funds couldn't have helped prop up their existing rail operations, potentially saving many from bankruptcy. In such a scenario, it's possible that the railroads might have been able to continue passenger rail service despite declining public interest due to car and air travel alternatives. Many people now lament the lack of any real passenger rail outside of Amtrak, so it's interesting to think what the effect on society could have been if passenger rail service was as plentiful as it had been before the invention of the automobile.

    • @DTD110865
      @DTD110865 2 ปีที่แล้ว +3

      Canadian Pacific Railway had an airline too, and so did other railroads.

    • @blogengeezer4507
      @blogengeezer4507 2 ปีที่แล้ว +5

      @@peterdibble ..Today the International tech giants use their intense influence over media, to elect powerful lawmakers, even manipulate the entire Washington DC control agenda.
      All done to ensure their continuance toward their goals. Stock portfolios, connected with future gains insider information, are obviously unenforced. Political affiliation loyalties are far stronger today, than at the higher morals time of 'Santa Fe Air Freight'. ;[

  • @usmale4915
    @usmale4915 2 ปีที่แล้ว +5

    Very good. I never knew Santa Fe formed an airline...absolutely fascinating! Thank you for your very informative video. It's greatly appreciated!

  • @PMass
    @PMass 2 ปีที่แล้ว +5

    I always love to watch your videos when they come out. Some very highly quality content about some amazing subjects

  • @1allanbmw
    @1allanbmw 2 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    It seems like only when other airlines complained (Juan Tripp?!) just 10 days later, after over a year of consideration, they were turned down. Hmm... Perhaps if the name had been different and there had not been such an obvious connection to Santa Fe, they might have been allowed an honest go of it? Not sure how real the fear of monopoly was. It wasn't until the '80's Ma Bell was broken up. And as a trucker, I'd have to argue that deregulation was a disaster generally speaking... a race to the bottom. As for innovation, who has refrigerated air service today? These guys really were thinking ahead! Well done, thank you for this video.

  • @emilkarpo
    @emilkarpo 2 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Winslow Arizona was also the location of one of the Santa Fe's Fred Harvey hotels, The La Posada. The hotel is still open and has been restored to its original greatness.

  • @jaytowne8016
    @jaytowne8016 2 ปีที่แล้ว +3

    At that time a company having common carriage over routes and then serving those routes or that area with more than one method was considered to be an anti trust law violation. Same as Matson Airlines to Honolulu.

  • @MrAndrew618
    @MrAndrew618 2 ปีที่แล้ว +3

    And now we seem to be moving in the opposite direction (sort of). After Pan Am went bankrupt, Guildford Rail (Maine and New Hampshire) bought the Pan Am name, logo, and other property. We now have a rail line sporting the historic Pan Am livery (en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Pan_Am_Systems)

  • @BogWraith1
    @BogWraith1 2 ปีที่แล้ว +2

    Peter, an absolutely stellar production!
    I'm a huge fan of what was the best railroad in existence IMO, but I never even knew about Skyway. Thank you for making this wonderful documentary. Instant subscriber! People need to know about your channel so as to grow your subscriber count!

  • @alextomlinson1725
    @alextomlinson1725 2 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    A fascinating and very well presented video Peter. Thank you.

  • @natethegreat5968
    @natethegreat5968 2 ปีที่แล้ว +2

    It’s always a good day when you post

  • @enigmawyoming5201
    @enigmawyoming5201 2 ปีที่แล้ว +2

    I love that fitting, and period correct music! Great job, I’m glad I subscribed to your channel.

  • @daybird2
    @daybird2 2 ปีที่แล้ว +2

    What a find this channel is. Great narrator as well as great content!

  • @SignalLightProductions
    @SignalLightProductions 2 ปีที่แล้ว +2

    Spectacular video as always! Very professional and informative.

  • @jaifarrell
    @jaifarrell ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Just discovered your channel. Really enjoyed this story. Superb production values too. Keep up the good work.

  • @DeanstuD
    @DeanstuD 2 ปีที่แล้ว +3

    I love your work. This is the best channel content since the history guy.

  • @3henry214
    @3henry214 2 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    I enjoyed this video every bit as much as your "Failure of the SPSF Rail Merger". Excellent Job!!

  • @Ben31337l
    @Ben31337l 2 ปีที่แล้ว +3

    "Santa Fe has been operating DC-3s and DC-4s between LA, Chicago and NY with such regularity as to constitute a common carrier operation"
    I am like yeah? So? With contract based operations you have a fixed term contracts, if the shipments are few but many, then yeah, you're going to have regular planes flying in and out of those airplanes at regular intervals.
    That's like business 101.

  • @Southwest_923WR
    @Southwest_923WR 2 ปีที่แล้ว +2

    Wow!
    Never knew of this, or heard anything about it.
    Thanks for info and visuals.
    Just goes to show you; "preferential treatment" can be a deterent to innovation and progress!

  • @terryaltherr2481
    @terryaltherr2481 ปีที่แล้ว

    I thought this was going to be about the planes that substituted the Super Chief so the passengers could take the plane by day and the train at night but this was even more interesting than I anticipated. Great work!

  • @DelftTrains
    @DelftTrains 2 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Amazing video Peter, I enjoyed it!

  • @nedmarc
    @nedmarc 2 ปีที่แล้ว +2

    Your content and design sense are amazing!

  • @Ice43758
    @Ice43758 2 ปีที่แล้ว +4

    Another high quality video, great job!

  • @michaela.chmieloski3196
    @michaela.chmieloski3196 2 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Very interesting story of one venture within the rail industry of which I was previously unaware, thank you for presenting it. Reminds me of when the Pennsylvania Railroad attempted to get into the PASSENGER airline business. If I recall correctly, the same cry of "Monopoly!" was used to helped put an end to that venture.

    • @kevinkurtz9889
      @kevinkurtz9889 2 ปีที่แล้ว

      Letting our railroads go to hell was a big mistake. Given a choice of flying or by rail, I'll take the rail.

  • @Greatdome99
    @Greatdome99 2 ปีที่แล้ว +11

    Boeing once owned United Airlines, and Southern Pacific owned Greyhound. Both were forced to divest as did the Santa Fe.

    • @safetymikeengland
      @safetymikeengland 2 ปีที่แล้ว

      Thank you.

    • @BandanRRChannel
      @BandanRRChannel 2 ปีที่แล้ว +2

      Sprint also started as an arm of Southern Pacific, specifically after realizing their internal telephone network had excess capacity (Southern Pacific Railroad Internal Network Telecommuncations) I think they spun it off while the rail side started going downhill (or maybe right before SPSF?) to generate extra cash. That might also be worth a video.

    • @rhuephus
      @rhuephus 2 ปีที่แล้ว

      Santa Fe did NOT divest it's airline .. they shut id down. A huge difference. Try actually watching the video

  • @davidtodora3153
    @davidtodora3153 2 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    It is so unfortunate that when good companies have something unique, it then takes to an end and out of business. Thanks

  • @scottpalmer829
    @scottpalmer829 2 ปีที่แล้ว +3

    This eerily reminds me of "Atlas Shrugged" where companies use the power of the government to squash upstart competitors. In this case other airlines vs. Santa Fe. The problem with these government rules "in the public interest" is that they have the potential to outlive their usefulness as times change. Over time these rules limit or put out of business that better, more efficient enterprise.

  • @ronniewall1481
    @ronniewall1481 2 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    I USE TO WALK TO TOWN AND WATCH TRAINS. THE SANTA FE SYMBOL WAS A FAVORITE.

  • @jeralddunn3782
    @jeralddunn3782 2 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    There was another similar Airline by the name of Zantop that operated under c a b Authority started at about the same time. I was a pilot for them back in the seventies. They started operating originally with c-46 condors. I would like to see a historical documentary about zantop. Thanks for that fine documentary on Santa Fe. I really enjoyed it

  • @jacktaggart2489
    @jacktaggart2489 2 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Excellent documentary on a little known history of the AT&SF, now BNSF. Their safety record screams of the care and concern Santa Fe exercised as an organization. Balancing overregulation with under regulation continues to challenge governing bodies today, as well.

  • @redram5150
    @redram5150 2 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Great documentary. I had a feeling government bureaucracy was the hurtle in this case. Can't let business win or fail on its own.

  • @Gizathecat2
    @Gizathecat2 2 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    I love your looks at little known history tidbits!

  • @hansssnet
    @hansssnet 2 ปีที่แล้ว +2

    This is a really well made video keep up the great work!

  • @andrewkeeney701
    @andrewkeeney701 2 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Excellent program and I learned something!! :-) Thank you, Andy K

  • @morkovija
    @morkovija 2 ปีที่แล้ว +5

    I wonder if it was just one of those 'robust conversations' that were had between lobbyist and the certification agencies behind closed doors. Or was it just some dumb incompetence, robbing us of 20 years of progress, before the likes of dhl or fedex. Thanks for the great banger of a video

  • @rutaloot
    @rutaloot 2 ปีที่แล้ว +2

    Great content, please keep it up, really enjoy your videos!

  • @motorTranz
    @motorTranz 2 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Excellent documentary! Thank you!

  • @jeffreyhunt1727
    @jeffreyhunt1727 2 ปีที่แล้ว +2

    Fantastic video! I love all the content that you're creating. Please keep it up!!

  • @scofab
    @scofab 2 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    First of your videos I've seen... well done.
    Subscribed.

  • @jon9103
    @jon9103 2 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    There is a Dibble Avenue in Seattle named after a mysterious F D Dibble.

  • @bierbrauer11
    @bierbrauer11 2 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Interesting that in your closing you call it a “missed opportunity” but what I gathered from the rest of the context was more that they were screwed out of the opportunity. Anyways, I don’t know anything about these topics lol and just enjoy what I am learning about rail from your videos so far. Another good one!

  • @johnshaft5613
    @johnshaft5613 2 ปีที่แล้ว +3

    The paint job on the aircraft on your thumbnail looks very similar, if not identical, to the paint job on the aircraft that went down in the original "Flight of the Phoenix". Is that a coincidence?

  • @torgeirbrandsnes1916
    @torgeirbrandsnes1916 2 ปีที่แล้ว

    Great vlog. This was new to me. Keep up the good work. Greetings from Norway!

  • @ian_davidson
    @ian_davidson 2 ปีที่แล้ว +2

    Amazing quality and exceptionally interesting video!

  • @ericcsuf
    @ericcsuf 2 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Well-researched and interesting with relevant visuals. Great job. Thanks.

  • @garymcmills3493
    @garymcmills3493 2 ปีที่แล้ว +2

    At one time the Santa Fe airway carried passengers on transcontinental hops I believe before World War 2. Also the Penn Central planned something similar, they had plans to buy 6 Lockheed C5 Galaxies to haul freight. The CAB turned them down also.

    • @rhuephus
      @rhuephus 2 ปีที่แล้ว

      not likely ... the airline did NOT startup unitl AFTER WW2 ... obviously you didn't watch the video

  • @DasMoose9001
    @DasMoose9001 2 ปีที่แล้ว

    Never heard of this channel and I frequent like channels...
    Subbed, happily.
    Great presentation, and obvious time went into the research behind the subject.
    Thank you!

  • @HyperActive7
    @HyperActive7 2 ปีที่แล้ว +17

    Don't blame the railroad, blame our fearless government and the airlines for shooting down a great concept they ended up losing to where you have only Fed EX and UPS air left with DHL in this country. Imagine how different the airline industry would have looked if Santa Fe had been allowed to do what they were planning to do.

    • @goldenstateaviation2861
      @goldenstateaviation2861 2 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      Well you also have other airlines one of the bigger ones being Atlas which operates Prime Air. But I do agree that they were basically robbed

    • @HyperActive7
      @HyperActive7 2 ปีที่แล้ว

      @General Bismarck Couldn't agree more because it happened to our family dairy business in the thirties when my great great grandfather refused to pasteurize his dairy products and was put out of business as the only dairy in all of SW PA and WV!

  • @jonclassical2024
    @jonclassical2024 2 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Great story, thank you for this look.......typical Federal Government...with such a great name and reputation.....they needed better lobbying!!!

  • @fubarmodelyard1392
    @fubarmodelyard1392 2 ปีที่แล้ว

    Excellent video and very interesting piece of missed opportunity history.

  • @islanduck
    @islanduck 2 ปีที่แล้ว

    Another masterpiece Peter! I need MORE!!!

  • @Pensyfan19
    @Pensyfan19 2 ปีที่แล้ว +2

    Very interesting video. I never knew that the mighty Santa Fe had connections in the east coast. I still prefer good old rail transport though. Much more efficient in moving goods and people than any plane or truck ever will.

  • @trainroomgary
    @trainroomgary 2 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Well done • Cheers from the Detroit & Mackinac Railway 🚂

  • @bossprime1098
    @bossprime1098 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Excellent documentaries.

  • @AJ67901
    @AJ67901 2 ปีที่แล้ว

    I read about this years ago. Thanks for making a video on it.

  • @mauricedavis2160
    @mauricedavis2160 2 ปีที่แล้ว

    Real history is so fascinating, thank you for such a wonderful channel Sir!!!🙏👍📖🤔

  • @propman3523
    @propman3523 2 ปีที่แล้ว

    I know a lot about this period of aviation and yet never heard of this cargo carrier. Good work!

  • @mpeg2tom
    @mpeg2tom 2 ปีที่แล้ว +2

    The Airline Deregulation Act of 1978 specified that the CAB would eventually be disestablished -- the first federal regulatory regime, since the 1930s, to be totally dismantled - and this happened on January 1, 1985.

  • @heiligenwho
    @heiligenwho 2 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    you are the super chief. what a great story of my presumed backdoor deals with politicians.

  • @agoatmannameddesire8856
    @agoatmannameddesire8856 2 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    More great work by Peter!

  • @ashleyrodriguwz2554
    @ashleyrodriguwz2554 2 ปีที่แล้ว

    Thanks for making another Amazing Video!

  • @StevenSeiller
    @StevenSeiller 2 ปีที่แล้ว

    The soundtrack is delightful! 🎼🙏

  • @McRocket
    @McRocket 2 ปีที่แล้ว

    Very impressively done.
    And I knew nothing of this subject.
    An interesting topic.
    Thank you.

  • @Senor0Droolcup
    @Senor0Droolcup 2 ปีที่แล้ว

    Peter this was excellent!

  • @602br61458
    @602br61458 2 ปีที่แล้ว

    This was an entertaining and informative video. I will look at your other work. Thanks.

  • @MK3914
    @MK3914 2 ปีที่แล้ว

    Love your videos!

  • @Baynewsvideo
    @Baynewsvideo 2 ปีที่แล้ว

    Thank You Mr. Dibble...nice work.

  • @pauliedweasel
    @pauliedweasel 2 ปีที่แล้ว

    Thanks you for a presentation on Santa Fe Airways