Schottky Diode Part 1 - Band Diagram

แชร์
ฝัง
  • เผยแพร่เมื่อ 15 พ.ค. 2019
  • / edmundsj
    If you want to see more of these videos, or would like to say thanks for this one, the best way you can do that is by becoming a patron - see the link above :). And a huge thank you to all my existing patrons - you make these videos possible.
    In this video, I introduce the Schottky diode, and sketch out what its band diagram looks like. I introduce the concept of the metal/semiconductor barrier height and talk about the relevance of band bending, and how this device is similar to a PN junction diode.
    This is part of my graduate series on semiconductor physics and devices, following the book by Donald Neamen. It is also based on content taught at UC Irvine in EECS 170A and 174.
    Hope you found this video helpful, please post in the comments below anything I can do to improve future videos, or suggestions you have for future videos.

ความคิดเห็น • 32

  • @douglasstrother6584
    @douglasstrother6584 3 ปีที่แล้ว +6

    These Band Diagrams are great tools to understand interface characteristics between two materials.
    To keep things straight in my head, I line up the Fermi Levels for each material (impose thermal equilibrium) then think about the charge redistribution needed to make them line up. Keep in mind that the band structure of the bulk material is unchanged, and the band bending occurs only in the interface region.
    This works for metal/semiconductor, metal/metal and semiconductor/semiconductor interfaces.

  • @Diaming787
    @Diaming787 2 ปีที่แล้ว +2

    Better explained than the textbook or the lecture in my Semiconductors class. Thanks!

  • @abdulrahmanabuelkhokhat501
    @abdulrahmanabuelkhokhat501 3 ปีที่แล้ว +3

    We love you prof.
    You're a life saver
    I have an exam and it all makes sense now
    Thanks 🙏

  • @ferncat1397
    @ferncat1397 4 ปีที่แล้ว +4

    THANK YOU

  • @pasha1663
    @pasha1663 3 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Keep doing more videos please. thet are very good. Thanks 😊

  • @evaschmid2583
    @evaschmid2583 4 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    I loved it!

  • @rvlli2377
    @rvlli2377 4 ปีที่แล้ว +6

    Question: I understand that the two materials have different Fermi levels, but why must the bands bend "to make the fermi levels the same?" I keep hearing this but don't understand for metal-on-semiconductor context.
    EDIT: Never mind! See 8:29 for the answer to my Q.

    • @siuharry5881
      @siuharry5881 3 ปีที่แล้ว +2

      Fermi level is the level that the state will always have 50% chance of begin occupuied. If Fermi level is not constant in the system, there will be net current flowing. However, we assume in thermal equalibrum. (You assume in steady state). No transfer of energy occuers. So if the fermi level is not constant, it violates the assumption.

  • @tiagoarakaki3992
    @tiagoarakaki3992 4 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Nice! Love from Brasil

  • @hilairesj
    @hilairesj 3 หลายเดือนก่อน

    @jordanedmundseecs
    I think that if it was a p type semi conductor the Fermi energy would be near the valence band. On your drawing, it is near the conduction band.

  • @harpritkaur5930
    @harpritkaur5930 3 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Sir can you plz help... I want notea on ptype Schottky diode

  • @RubenTavernier
    @RubenTavernier 2 ปีที่แล้ว

    Thank you.

  • @christosvasiliou219
    @christosvasiliou219 7 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Dude i fucking love you, all your videos are so helpful

  • @samkessler3015
    @samkessler3015 2 ปีที่แล้ว

    Aren't there 2 barriers? One on each contact to the semiconductor?

  • @jozafsalmi123
    @jozafsalmi123 ปีที่แล้ว

    what is the difference between one said junction (p+n''''''n+p) and schottky diode

  • @opsahu8714
    @opsahu8714 9 หลายเดือนก่อน

    u explained this for system of metal and semiconductor with same value of work function, i.e. fermilevel and vacuum level of both align with eachother. i want u to check that again.

  • @rvlli2377
    @rvlli2377 4 ปีที่แล้ว +2

    At 10:28 are we sure it's a negative voltage that would be applied to decrease the barrier height and not a positive one? I'm used to seeing that height defined as (phi_i - Va) where Va is a negative bias so now I'm confused.

    • @JordanEdmundsEECS
      @JordanEdmundsEECS  4 ปีที่แล้ว

      Va is assumed to be a positive voltage here. A positive voltage applied to the p-side should reduce the barrier height.

    • @user-cz5qz7gd6o
      @user-cz5qz7gd6o 4 ปีที่แล้ว

      @@JordanEdmundsEECS The video is really helpful. But I have a question. If the negative charge increase. The bending of the n-type semiconductor should be more curved. Wondering why is the barrier height will decrease?

    • @amanjlateef8115
      @amanjlateef8115 4 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      @@user-cz5qz7gd6o yeah you are right instead of negative it must be a positive pole to reduce the curve

    • @papammeheia68
      @papammeheia68 ปีที่แล้ว

      It should be positive voltage to reduce the barrier

  • @abdolw3682
    @abdolw3682 5 ปีที่แล้ว +2

    Hello sir, what about p-type semiconductor? How the depletion region will be? And where the electric field direction will be? Thank you

  • @r.w178
    @r.w178 ปีที่แล้ว

    A remark on the bending of the vacuum level:
    As many here I was confused about why the vacuum level is not constant but bends. I thought a lot about it, because the vacuum level is the energy of an electron far away from the sample. This should be the same regardless of the material, voltage,…
    In fact, there is an ambiguity in the definition: 1. There is a vacuum level, often used in semiconductor physics, that is measured right above the surface of the material. This vacuum level shifts, as you said. 2.) There is a vacuum level as I explained above (which is measured from infinity). This vacuum level is an absolute reference.
    In the second case, the electron affinity/work function changes, and the vacuum level stays constant. Why? Because, if I apply a voltage to the sample, the energy of the electrons may decrease (or increase), which leads to the bending of valence an conduction band. Of course this changes the energy needed to take an electron from the sample and bring it far away (the vacuum energy). In the end you do not only have to overcome the ionisation energy (like in the case without applied external field) but you also have to overcome the energy of the electric field.
    Another effect is happening when we apply no voltage but e.g. make a metal-semiconductor junction or a p-n-junction: There is a potential difference (energy difference) between p- and n-side because of the electric field in the depletion region. This causes the work function to shift. The siping itself does also shift the work function, but this effect is negligible (as I was told).
    In short: I think the vacuum level is constant and the electron affinity/work function changes. It also leads to the same band diagram (at least vor E_c and E_v). What do you think about it?

  • @lucadebs7872
    @lucadebs7872 11 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    Why at the 8:50 minute the semiconductor bands rise high? I think they should rise down so Ef of the metal (white line) will "stick" to Ef of the semiconductor (blue line). You drew that graph assuming the Ef of the semiconductor is greater than that of the metal.. then at 8:57 it seems you changed your mind

    • @bolshevik7943
      @bolshevik7943 5 หลายเดือนก่อน

      The same doubt🥲

  • @utkarshbajpai5035
    @utkarshbajpai5035 2 ปีที่แล้ว

    Great content! But at the end when bending was performed, I don't think the vaccum level Eo will bend ... please correct me if I am wrong...

    • @JordanEdmundsEECS
      @JordanEdmundsEECS  2 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      The vacuum level is always the same distance from the conduction band, so it has to bend as well. That doesn’t mean that an electron will have more energy when it is freed from the semiconductor. Once it’s in vacuum, this band structure no longer applies.

  • @aga7679
    @aga7679 4 ปีที่แล้ว +2

    Are u sure the fermi level will be same through out the combination? Hmm

    • @seandafny
      @seandafny 4 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      At thermal equilibrium yea

  • @jaskiratsingh389
    @jaskiratsingh389 3 ปีที่แล้ว +2

    Nice
    Love from INDIA

  • @asawirshakeebasmaail5114
    @asawirshakeebasmaail5114 ปีที่แล้ว

    Thnx soooooo much
    الله يرزقك الجنة يا ربي

  • @althaf706
    @althaf706 3 ปีที่แล้ว

    PEOPLE ARE HIGHLY FOCUSED ON THIS TO BE UNDERSTOOD, SO PLEASE STOP TAKING UNNESSESARY THINGS