Hello, I am an undergradute electronic engineering student who has recently started working with scattering and green's functions and I'm trying to relate this to a synthetic aperture ground penetrating radar, but this radar doesn't work describing a linear trajectory like the one on an airplane, but describes a circular path. I was wondering if you could help me understand the the relationship between born approx. and the GPR mentioned above related to the waves and its scattering. thankyou
I'm not really very familiar with GPR calculations, but I'm guessing that you could sort of replace the wave function with the electric/magnetic field and you'd be close. Of course E/M fields are real vector fields, not complex scaler fields, but you get the idea. Also the Born approx. is best when the interaction between the field and the potential is weak, which may not be true with GPR. Sorry I can't be more help.
Sir your lectures are really very helpful.. thank you so much sir
Hello, I am an undergradute electronic engineering student who has recently started working with scattering and green's functions and I'm trying to relate this to a synthetic aperture ground penetrating radar, but this radar doesn't work describing a linear trajectory like the one on an airplane, but describes a circular path.
I was wondering if you could help me understand the the relationship between born approx. and the GPR mentioned above related to the waves and its scattering.
thankyou
I'm not really very familiar with GPR calculations, but I'm guessing that you could sort of replace the wave function with the electric/magnetic field and you'd be close. Of course E/M fields are real vector fields, not complex scaler fields, but you get the idea. Also the Born approx. is best when the interaction between the field and the potential is weak, which may not be true with GPR. Sorry I can't be more help.
ok, I'll check it out and maybe consider new options instead of the Born approx.
thank you for your time.