Ways to support the channel/special deals. VPN DEAL: get.surfshark.net/aff_c?offer_id=1448&aff_id=19647 PATREON: www.patreon.com/UEG LOCALS: upperechelon.locals.com/support
I watched Dogpack, Soggy, and even Asmon's response. This is what I can gather. 1) The hiring of offenders is something that definitely happened, but as mentioned, it was likely to be a mistake rather than something outright malicious. By that point it was already too late to change his employment status. 2) The thing with Ava did happen. MrBeast obviously didn't support that behavior, my question is did he actually actively attempted to cover it up? 3) Soggy did not address the allegations of Lacoya Hill. There have been allegations, none of which have been conclusively proven as of now. It is not conclusive he is innocent either. 4) Mr Beast reportedly claimed that the videos did not use CGI. Dogpack proven that he did use CGI in multiple instances. Soggy's counter was that the CGI was done as a stylistic and aesthetic choice, rather that outright falsifying the content. The point still stands that CGI was indeed use, and no clear disclaimer had been given. Soggy also did not address the hospital CGI, which gave the impression the hospital was built from the ground up, when in actuality solar panels were installed. I am sorry, but I think Soggy is the one doing the misrepresentation here. 5) Soggy used the interview and recording of Lacoya firing Dogpack as this big gotcha moment, when in reality, if he wish to prove malicious intent, wouldn't it make more sense for Dogpack to go after Lacoya instead of MrBeast. 6) In addition, the reason for Dogpack's firing is not stated. All we have are testimonies saying it was depressing to work with him. I happen to have autism, and let's just say, I recognize someone with the same symptoms. Are you absolutely certain his firing has absolutely nothing to do with his autistic behaviour? 7) The illegal gambling, I can believe it, it was a mistake. Is it a scummy practice for Mr Beast to scream out GUYS WE'RE LOSING MONEY when he is actually raking millions? Yes. Was it illegal? No. 8) One of the worst things you can do at a time of public scrutiny, is to join Logan Paul. Just by association, he gave people convenient bullets. He might as well have shown a video of himself kicking a puppy.
I watched Dogpack, Soggy, and even Asmon's response. This is what I can gather. 1) The hiring of offenders is something that definitely happened, but as mentioned, it was likely to be a mistake rather than something outright malicious. By that point it was already too late to change his employment status. 2) The thing with Ava did happen. MrBeast obviously didn't support that behavior, my question is did he actually actively attempted to cover it up? 3) Soggy did not address the allegations of Lacoya Hill. There have been allegations, none of which have been conclusively proven as of now. It is not conclusive he is innocent either. 4) Mr Beast reportedly claimed that the videos did not use CGI. Dogpack proven that he did use CGI in multiple instances. Soggy's counter was that the CGI was done as a stylistic and aesthetic choice, rather that outright falsifying the content. The point still stands that CGI was indeed use, and no clear disclaimer had been given. Soggy also did not address the hospital CGI, which gave the impression the hospital was built from the ground up, when in actuality solar panels were installed. I am sorry, but I think Soggy is the one doing the misrepresentation here. 5) Soggy used the interview and recording of Lacoya firing Dogpack as this big gotcha moment, when in reality, if he wish to prove malicious intent, wouldn't it make more sense for Dogpack to go after Lacoya instead of MrBeast. 6) In addition, the reason for Dogpack's firing is not stated. All we have are testimonies saying it was depressing to work with him. I happen to have autism, and let's just say, I recognize someone with the same symptoms. Are you absolutely certain his firing has absolutely nothing to do with his autistic behaviour? 7) The illegal gambling, I can believe it, it was a mistake. Is it a scummy practice for Mr Beast to scream out GUYS WE'RE LOSING MONEY when he is actually raking millions? Yes. Was it illegal? No. 8) One of the worst things you can do at a time of public scrutiny, is to join Logan Paul. Just by association, he gave people convenient bullets. He might as well have shown a video of himself kicking a puppy. 9) If I went through something extremely unpleasant, the staff came up to me and said, "That's a war crime bro," that's the first thing I will forever remember in my brain, not the "just kidding LOL" that comes seconds later. That's what happened in Waddle's mind. He didn't think it was a joke, he registered that as the truth.
I watched Dogpack, Soggy, and even Asmon's response. This is what I can gather. 1) The hiring of offenders is something that definitely happened, but as mentioned, it was likely to be a mistake rather than something outright malicious. By that point it was already too late to change his employment status. 2) The thing with Ava did happen. MrBeast obviously didn't support that behavior, my question is did he actually actively attempted to cover it up? 3) Soggy did not address the allegations of Lacoya Hill. There have been allegations, none of which have been conclusively proven as of now. It is not conclusive he is innocent either. 4) Mr Beast reportedly claimed that the videos did not use CGI. Dogpack proven that he did use CGI in multiple instances. Soggy's counter was that the CGI was done as a stylistic and aesthetic choice, rather that outright falsifying the content. The point still stands that CGI was indeed use, and no clear disclaimer had been given. Soggy also did not address the hospital CGI, which gave the impression the hospital was built from the ground up, when in actuality solar panels were installed. I am sorry, but I think Soggy is the one doing the misrepresentation here. 5) Soggy used the interview and recording of Lacoya firing Dogpack as this big gotcha moment, when in reality, if he wish to prove malicious intent, wouldn't it make more sense for Dogpack to go after Lacoya instead of MrBeast. 6) In addition, the reason for Dogpack's firing is not stated. All we have are testimonies saying it was depressing to work with him. I happen to have autism, and let's just say, I recognize someone with the same symptoms. Are you absolutely certain his firing has absolutely nothing to do with his autistic behaviour? 7) The illegal gambling, I can believe it, it was a mistake. Is it a scummy practice for Mr Beast to scream out GUYS WE'RE LOSING MONEY when he is actually raking millions? Yes. Was it illegal? No. 8) One of the worst things you can do at a time of public scrutiny, is to join Logan Paul. Just by association, he gave people convenient bullets. He might as well have shown a video of himself kicking a puppy.
I watched Dogpack, Soggy, and even Asmon's response. This is what I can gather. 1) The hiring of offenders is something that definitely happened, but as mentioned, it was likely to be a mistake rather than something outright malicious. By that point it was already too late to change his employment status. 2) The thing with Ava did happen. MrBeast obviously didn't support that behavior, my question is did he actually actively attempted to cover it up? 3) Soggy did not address the allegations of Lacoya Hill. There have been allegations, none of which have been conclusively proven as of now. It is not conclusive he is innocent either. 4) Mr Beast reportedly claimed that the videos did not use CGI. Dogpack proven that he did use CGI in multiple instances. Soggy's counter was that the CGI was done as a stylistic and aesthetic choice, rather that outright falsifying the content. The point still stands that CGI was indeed use, and no clear disclaimer had been given. Soggy also did not address the hospital CGI, which gave the impression the hospital was built from the ground up, when in actuality solar panels were installed. I am sorry, but I think Soggy is the one doing the misrepresentation here.
no no no. oompa.. i like beast.(6 months ago) oompa...ohhh Beast.. illegal lotterieS ?? ( 5 months ago) oompa.... OHH sh1tee.... HIRED.. DELEWARE THEN RE-HIRED THEN RE-HIRED TO EXECUTIVE? OHHH (4 MONTHS AGO) oompa... OHH DIDN'T PAY 8 MONTHS TO ... NOWWW.. DIDN'T PAY THE BLIND SURGERIES UNTIL A VIDEO FROM.. THEM.. OH MY GOSH... (3 MONTHS A) oompa..... OHHH... CRYPTO SCAM VIDEO FROM..... COFFEE ZILLA... LEGIT DUDE.. HE HAD BIT QUESTIONS TOO... BEAST IS NOT CLEAR (1 MONTH) THEN... oompa.. interview with 20 NEGATIVE VIDEOs on BEAST.... HE DEF want to SUCK him off now.. cuz its "BEAST"... so he does the 58 YR old mike tyson.. TRICK on us... OOMPA INTERVIEW WITH BEAST .. HEADS ON.... "you do it?" ... "NAH MY TEAM DID IT"..... "oh ok".... PEACE GUYS.. GIVE ME MILLIONS VIEWS. ( I'M unsub'd completely now OOMPA).
I can't wait to watch Asmongold reacting to moistcr1t1kal's and someordinarygamers' reactions to uppereschelon's reaction to mr beast's reaction to the allegations
You hit the nail on the head dude. I thought I was going crazy, like how was i the only one not being manipulated by this? It's very clear he took all of this time to plot the perfect way to herd sheep back into his wallet.
Oh my god same, they swept so many of the claims under the rug it's insane... The entire Soggy Cereal video was "debunking" superfluous claims or debunking portions of the claims that were not the main substantive complaint at all... For one example, the "war crime" claim. No one was seriously claiming Mr Beast committed an ACTUAL war crime. There weren't crimes committed and it wasn't during a war, so for the "debunk" to be "well he didn't commit war crimes" is nuts. The main substance of that complaint was the inhumane treatment of a contestant and the lack of proper procedure on behalf of the production team to ensure his mental and physical well being. To sweep all that under the rug by just saying "well it wasn't a war crime" as if THAT'S what people were actually saying is just so disingenuous. And every single one of the "debunked" claims were treated in the exact same manner by both Mr Beast and Soggy Cereal.
Idk to me it sounds like he didn’t take any time at all. All of his responses are just need your reactions. Anybody could have come up with the first week of the controversy. you know what I mean? They had all this time to come up with an actual defense rather than just deflect.
I think one point that can't be easily proven is that he might be a clinical psychopath, which would explain why he doesn't empathize with conversations about others being in pain, and can seem very eloquent and even smart, since he learned how to do it. It's impossible to read a person like that because there is no true empathy or "humanity" there. Also, all psychopaths are narcissists as well, and he does base a lot of arguments on himself or how it affects him. It's just a possibility though...
Things missed in UpperEchelon: -Soggy's creditability in the video is very shaky with the following: A false character assassination towards Pegasus (video would be edited because of it), a false pedo accusation towards Camnugget (video clip would be deleted and apologized), and the paid interviews -The eye surgery and mold aren't just footnotes since the eye surgery shows bad management towards charities and the mold is a food risk. Both were pretty much answered with "It happens."
@@greendino1310 The point is if you are gonna do something then do it right and make sure is gets handled correctly. If you have so much on your plate that you can't do it correctly then don't do it. If his defence is "I'm making videos for 3 channels, managing 2 companies, and trying to have a life.", then don't fucking do it if its gonna be done badly.
The thing about the mold too is that, apparently, Beast Burger also had mold in it’s food. You can chalk up the first time to mismanagement, sure, but the fact that mold was still an issue in Lunchly, not only shows a severe management issue but it could also suggest neglect.
No disrespect to Oompa, but this was a terrible interview. He takes all of Jimmy's answers at face value and doesn't really delve into any of his non-answers It feels like damage control, specifically Jimmy trying to swing the pendulum that is the court of public opinion the other way. Just because Dogpack straight up made some sh!t up, which Soggy disproved, doesn't mean that there isn't still stuff that needs to be adressed
You missed the point of this interview, it wasn't to press Jimmy to the limits which would have been disrespectful, it was to platform him so that he can explain himself, this was like a response video more than an interview, even at the start Jimmy keeps talking about how "I made a video but it isn't my style, I think this is going to be better, I assume this is the correct format for this"
@@momomon7662 ... So? First of all, that would be lying regardless Second of all, that doesn't negate the criticisms of the response and the manipulation tactics he's pulling.
1950 out of 2000 and he couldn't find "A single broken bone". As someone who has heard statistics tweaked by experts before, that sounds like a perfect admission of "So we MIGHT have left fifty people with broken bones, and I'm not saying anything about other kinds of injuries."
He said they tried to reach to them but couldnt It doesnt matter anyways. He isnt actually trying to say they tried to check 2000 people to see if anyone had broken bones. He is trying to say no one had broken bones in the set.
I would go as far as to say that it's highly unlikely that noone broke anything in an event like this with 2000 contestants. If there are lots of physical activities and that many people competing, someone _will_ break something even in the upmost perfectly controlled circumstances. I don't think i was on a single school sports event when i was younger where there wasn't _at least_ one greater injury or a broken bone. So saying that out of those 1950 contestants they couldn't find a single injury is either straight up a lie, or they had the luckiest event in all of history.
@@toastbrot97don't guess. Show receipts. Don't be a defamatory dogpack. Even if there are bones broken, so what? Accidents happen. Cancel culture at its peak
@@user-kf4gt7bo2k Because the allegations were "multiple people had broken bones in the set" So he said no thats not true. Why would he say shit like "oh one person stubbed his toe" when thats relevant? He also said if there were any injuries, they wouldnt continue filming. Thats what he said.
DogPack's biases notwithstanding, Mr. Beast needs to address the allegations against him in a serious manner because only explaining one or two circumstances then copping out and dodging accountability for the rest is only going to piss more people off and therefore scrutinize his every action further.
"needs to" not really, he will be very successful in dodging all accountability with the BS he's doing right now. his defenders will signal boost the interview and soggys video to the ends of the world as "CASE CLOSED! HE DROPPED THE MIC AND DEBUNKED IT ALL" and everyone like philly d will push the narrative.
literally this, and there is also the serious stuff with the Amazon beast games contestants being hurt and not being given basic needs. There is also illegal lotteries, kris being a disgusting creep, Jake Weddle solitary incident; etc
@@lJ0blixen yes, he was. He still managed to actually show some of dogpack's inaccuracies and a motive (being a disgruntled employee). Not that it changes anything, dogpack clearly and repeteadly mentions that many of the things he says are alleged (to the point of exaggeration sometimes), and at least to me it's always been clear that he was disgruntled and throwing a lot at the wall to see what stuck, and it just turned out most of what mattered seems to have stuck.
My issues with Mr Beast are simple: he has allegations against him, some better substantiated than others, and like any allegation, it needs addressing and debunking or owning up to. What he is instead doing is attempting to punch minute holes into his accuser's credibility while focusing a magnifying glass on those minute holes to make them appear as if they debunk his whole pile of accusations 'because he's not credible/trustworthy'. This isn't what someone innocent would do. This isn't what someone naive would do. This is what a person who doesn't actually care but wants the 'bad rep' to go away would do. After all, TH-cam is nearly two decades old at this point, IIRC, and we've seen our share of bad apples over that time, and this 'response' has all the same hallmarks of those whom have come before, for instance Fouseytube, former Faze Kay, or Jaystation, don't address anything as that means admitting that there's accusations against you just deflect until it goes away. (Oh, and Oompaville is just a bad interviewer if you're looking for the interviewee to be pressed on anything).
Goes a bit further than that even imo: Mr Beast has these allegations against him and is deciding to fight them in public by "addressing them" without really making any substantive arguments besides, "The other guy's a big dummy and he doesn't know what he's talking about." It's a gigantic problem when some of these allegations (i.e. the Team Seas one being a great example) seem to be true just based on publicly available information and Jimmy has effectively either ignored them or used attacking the idiotic allegations as a "clear of all wrongdoing" against the ones that seem to have a huge degree of validity behind them. Jimmy had the option of just not saying anything in the public sphere and if pressed on it, just say, "I'll defer to my legal team on that one." Not exactly the best PR defense but it's a "viable" tactic because it forces people to wait and see what the court of law decides on anything he's being sued over. Fighting it actively in the public sphere requires him to "demonstrate" why the claims are false and debunk them to the Nth degree or it requires him accepting he did poorly and vowing to do better (at least publicly). Somehow though, Jimmy has actively taken the worst of both paths by attempting to fight this publicly without accepting accountability, without showing details of why claims like the Team Seas ones are false, not deferring to his legal team publicly when it comes to stuff he's being sued over, and most of his defense publicly has been relying on him going after weak claims to say, "See, these ones are obviously untrue so that must mean all of it is untrue." Man's acting like most trust fund kids (and as bad as the comparison sounds, he's acting almost like Johnny Somali minus the intentionally terrorizing people bits). Stick him with anything and he'll try to avoid accountability. If he can't avoid it, he starts crying foul and tries to have a, "You turned them against me!" type of moment. You can see all these sorts of traits when you see him near anyone who talks bad about his food brand's products. Starts looking like he's been possessed and is an inch from committing to a salt on the person.
@@OnTheThirdDay what are you talking about, coffee literally reached out to mrbeast but was ignored. Instead he settled with criticizing mrbeast's crypto scam. Hes not on his side bud.
Its very obvious that Mr. Beast is trying to repair his image and is attempting to use Dogpack as a lynch pin for that, certainly its important to understand that Dogpack wasn't unbiased and didn't do the best job of making the facts clear VS things that were alleged, as well as the overall presentation being very nonchalant... but plenty of those things were very valid and there hasn't been any proper refute of the evidence... The investigation was a complete joke that didnt address any of the core issues either. To me, this just reads like doing a podcast tour to fix his image by focusing solely dogpack.
id go one step further, its not a podcast tour, its mrbeast making "mrbeast defence" content, hes producing and in full control of it all, hes just having other people upload it to their channels and put their name to it to add legitimacy to it.
@@DanielJacobs-rz1zl thats a lie mrbeast defenders keep stating to craft the narrative, most of his claims have absolutely not been disproven. mrbeast in this interview alone confirms more of dogpack claims than he disproves.
Jimmy was smart in saying REPEATEDLY that he was “ignorant” and that it’s just what “large companies are like.” He’s stupid however to think that we wouldn’t pick up on that bs.
The, "I'm not a groomer, just a loser" defense, except it's "I'm not malicious, I'm just stupid" instead. Sure, Hanlon's razor is a thing, but that only goes so far.
You have Jake the Viking saying Jimmy knew, Matt turner said he heard of a criminal record as well as providing more context on why Delaware was hired, Jake Weddle said he heard things from water cooler talk, Kris Tyson replying on Jake the Viking on twitter a SCREENSHOT of Delaware RSO record and you have Garrett confirming he was the guy on Dogpack 2nd video voice record and said that's "the rumor". And now you have MrBeast saying he and his Mom (who is the hiring manager), "don't remember"? and that's it? IDK man thats seems too convenient to say. ¯\_(ツ)_/¯
only in cuckville, usa can you be 16, be persecuted for a crime of having a girlfriend and then be called a pdf for the rest of time. all this in a country that celebrates the most extreme forms of degeneracy ever known to man. all signs of a society that's rotten to the core.
Wow someone that has a grudge against him said something, it must be true. It may it may be not, but we need to start requiring evidence before believing
@@sann7564 more like he is a registered r@pist of a young child and took the plea so he didn’t get done to him what he did to said young girl in prison
coffezilla really messed up mrbeast huh 😂 not 2 week after coffeezilla's take on his crypto history, suddenly theres sponsored soggy content with beast employee which is more on directing hate narrative on dogpack (im not saying he is a good guy) rather than debunking important allegation + background push soggy video to other commentary yutuber, now theres this "oopsie my bad" interview
@@tommysaja5106 Yeah right as if he is a christian lol, where that signature "conflict between body and spirit" of the average christian? He is literally the type of guy to gain the world but lose his soul lol.
I think this was incredibly irresponsible of Caleb. I think it's just going to do what happened for Dan Schneider, where it'll absolve him for his supporters while taking pressure off of him to make an actual response, taking actual accountability. I think Oompaville got played like a fiddle
@@pettykittyfam yeah… he had muta’s seal of approval by friendship but now I’m questioning everything and everyone :( I know you shouldn’t have parasocial relationships with yters but I trust muta’s judgement for things. We’ll see how he responds
@@pettykittyfam Nothing to be disappointed about. Oompa has never been a person to shy away from talking to people on both sides of a conversation. You would be an idiot to only listen to one side and wholeheartedly believe everything they are saying. There is nothing wrong with speaking to people to get information from both sides and coming to a conclusion yourself based on the evidence or lack there of from both sides.
I think one of they biggest things that got me about Jimmy's interview, was he used a very big gaslighting technique of the "you wouldn't understand" phrase to dodge around explaining things. There were many times I would hear stuff like " oh well you might not understand this but" or " they might not understand this but" and not explain anything. And I really wish oompaville kinda pushed more at these like " well try me let's see if you can explain it"
I actually lost all respect for Oompaville over that video. It's obvious he's garbage at asking hard questions. This reeks of damage control and silencing critics. I don't fully believe dogpack, but I don't trust a thing mr.beast is saying either. The *best* channel for the interview would have been Coffeezilla or any other interviewer.
I mean, if he's going that soft on Jimmy, it feels like he's just hoping to snug up to the Mr.Beast brand and the potential money he could get through him. Oompa has proven previously that he's not stupid, he should be able to read between the lines and he's not willing to put Mr.Beast on a burner for integrity. This interview does paint Oompa in a bad light.
True but Oompa did say he isn’t a journalist and doesn’t want to imply he is a journalist or a good one. He cleared that up at the start of the video. I think constructive criticism is what he needs to continue to do more videos as such but I think Mr.Beast took advantage of him.
That’s exactly why Mr beast got interviewed by him, not coffee. Coffee is a great interviewer and it’d be dumb af to willingly do that when you’re guilty
He does not give a flying Fig what his fans or people think. He will just slip off into the sunset with all the millions you silly people gave him and for what? He's a muppet of the highest level
Eh he burns money like crazy I doubt he has millions of disposable cash on hand and I don’t think it’s the money that’s driving him it seems more like the fame and the image he’s cultivated of himself as some savior is what he enjoys most
he cares what his fans think, but remember his fans are not us, theyre very young and naive ipad kids. they will buy his defence wholesale (if theyre even aware of the allegations that is)
That guy's true currency is attention. Its what he wants. If it was about the money he has more than enough for generations and he'd have already done what you said. IMO.
1:46 before the drama, his reddit page used to be open as well. You could post whatever, comment whatever. But then he had the mods lock it down to video discussion only and comments heavily criticising him were removed.
I completely agree that his ability to coherently and effectively explain his one response only highlights the lies and faux-stupid-nice-guy responses to the other serious allegations. There's a lot of signs of narcissistic behavior. He both thinks he is playing 4-D chess and can get everyone to believe he's a humble, well-meaning, naïve guy, but he just couldn't help himself to show how smart and well informed he actually is when given the chance.
I remember watching a JRE clip and joe asked him along the lines of "did you think you were ever going to fail" and he just gave the cockiest answer. And i'm not buying the humble, I wear plain clothes and flip flops even though I'm loaded, like how SBF said I still drive my old car and also wore a plain t-shirt. You would look at these people and wonder how they even get anything done, but of course that's part of the lie. Even bill cosby donated a bunch of money to charity before he got thrown into the slammer, either to make himself look good or because he felt guilty AF. Like, even being in the same room as logan paul will tell you all you need to know. Once you know the games these people play, you will be able to cut through the bs and word salad, even if you're not good at reading body language. I just hope that they get their comeuppance.
@@runningwolf2335 Regarding the Cosby question it's both imo. There's the obvious writing off of some amount of their millions for the purpose of laundering their reputations but the cognitive dissonance of feeling guilty while also enjoying and/or reaping the benefits of what they're doing to others only causes them to dig their heels in further and justify their actions by privileging the charity in the minds as if it cancels out their evil acts.
Honestly, I couldn't watch more than 30 minutes. So much of it reminded me of the narcissist's prayer. We know most people at the top of big businesses are or have narcissistic tendencies. But at the same time, what can we really expect when a person's rise to fame happens during the egocentrism of their teenage years? I'm seeing it more and more on TH-cam. Having faced no consequences for their actions thanks to their fame, they've have no real reality check to burst any inflated sense of ego. He is still young enough that he could change, and 'catch up', but if this interview is anything to go by, I don't think it'll happen.
When Soggy's video came out, I saw Mr. Beast commenting, "finally, a video that doesn't lie about me" or something like that. That was an incredibly arrogant and stupid move to make. I had to double-check if that was the real Mr. Beast (it was), because that looked so bad. Like the villain that needs to brag about their master plan, he couldn't help himself. I don't think he's cartoonishly evil, but I doubt he's very sorry either. He's probably more concerned about protecting his image and his brand than he is about actually making things right.
@@flarestorm9417 i actually believe he wants his imagine protected because he won’t be able to get sponsors. In the interview, he talked about his Philanthropy Channel which he confirms that he doesn’t own and is a charity. For him to be able to continue doing good, he needs sponsors and donations to continue helping and that’s ultimately his goal. If people believe that his philanthropy channel is a scam or doesn’t actually help people, sponsors won’t want to bring in money.
lol no, the world needs less ppl who feel "guilty until proven innocent" is an appropriate response. Jimmy doesn't have to prove anything, the onus is on the accuser and in a court of law, not the court of public opinion. I think less of UE after watching this, much less.
@@sirtra jimmy does have to prove it innocent by defending his self against the accusations and so far in my opinion he has been doing a piss poor job of it as UE and many other creators have pointed out. Let’s be honest sometime the court of public opinion is better than the court of law, money, power and fame rule this world and with those people can influence the narrative and outcome of things. Two current examples for you, R. Kelly and Diddy lots of people have knew for years that these people should’ve been in jail but why wasn’t they though, money power Fame all things jimmy has.
@@sirtra no I’m not 16 but I am old enough to articulate my point and provide two names to support my argument that you disregarded lol and instead resorting to insult, I can articulate myself once again. Would you like me to provide more example where the court of public opinion knew somebody was a bad person or did something bad thatwasn’t caught or maybe they got away with. I’ll do it anyway, O.J. Simpson, court of law found him innocent What’s your stance on that? hey let’s make it personal. I’m sure you know people that are fycked up individuals or have done some questionable things but to the court of law they’re an upstanding citizen right? They not in jail even though you know they probably should, Maybe a few drug dealers wanna be gang members I’m sure you got these people in your city don’t you?
finally someone who doesn't instantly become a mr beast glazer again.... nuxanor, quintheo, more pegasus... so disappointed in those guys. the way they rolled over because mr beast dm'd them. straight back to clout chasing.
why would you be dissapointed on TH-camrs that ONLY love money? Mr. Beast PAID them to flop, and they did. They always do that, every TH-camr You don't hate TH-camrs for the scum that they are
Not sure if you actually watched Quintheo's video on the Oompa video or not, but he still remains pretty critical of Mr. Beast. He was mainly agreeing that Dogpack made a lot of mistakes that ended up hurting his credibility, but he was also critical of Oompa's interview since he pointed out a lot of the allegations that went unanswered in that video (along with how soft he felt Oompa was on the questions). I may be wrong, but I get the impression that you probably saw the title and thumbnail for Quintheo's video regarding the recent updates and didn't actually watch it, 'cause I got basically zero impression that he became a Beast glazer or something.
As someone who works in HR.. there is no excuse for jimmy having his mother as the head of HR. Especially this long. This should have been corrected years ago. Years. You should not give him a pass on that. It's a big deal. Look into it.
Honest question. Is the problem simply that she is a family member of Mr beast, or is the problem that she has no credentials [ i.e. manager experience or college degree] and should not be the head of HR?
@@surewhynot6259 BUT SHE IS MORE THAN QUALIFIED LMAO SHE WAS LITERALLY A FIRST FEMALE WARDEN OF THE BIGGEST US FOREIGN MILITARY PRISON IN GERMANY FOR DECADES
@@Woodsie_Lordjust because you've been in a certain position doesn't make you qualified for another, completely different and unrelated position. Being the "first female warden" for a military prison doesn't make you better at running a production company focused on making videos for children. What aspects of being a PRISON WARDEN translate into being a good fit for running a TH-cam challenge video channel? The people who work there are not in prison (and shouldn't feel like they are), and the skill set for running a prison doesn't seem to have much overlap with a fun video production company. I imagine a good warden type to run a tight ship, making sure nothing slips between the cracks. Obviously, that's not the case. So what exactly are her qualifications to be the head of the company? I can see major conflicts of interest, so there's another point against her being in that position, but I'm really not seeing any points in her favor.
I'm so sick of people like Mr Beast getting away with being awfull, immoral, and criminal. The fact he's started a business with Logan Paul tells me everything I need to know.
Finally!! This is the best cover so far! Majority of people could see straight through this nonsense. In my eyes this just made him look even worse. And FFS his mum was a prison warden and didn't know about background check? Nor how to manage a small company (that time small) PLZZZZ😂😂😂
exactly! other ppls commentary on the interview ended up being so bloody grating bc they just believe everything jimmy said without checking or delving deeper into the claims. it’s almost pointless that the interview occurred in the manner it did. the depth creators like UE have gone into regarding the allegations should’ve been an indicator that a half arsed interview isn’t going to make everything go away
It's dumb to argue that Mr Beast is somehow out of the thickets. Clearing up some small little details do nothing to his credibility. People need to stop complaining about "slop" TH-camrs like Pegasus and focus on the real problem...
@@EternalMetaphorI literally don't know. Sure he hired a pedo and SA offender. But there's different between not background checks (bad but mistake). And intentionally hiring them, and joking about. Latter's what they were claiming. before.
THANK YOU!!! It was so weird watching "the internet" forgive him so easily and acting as if that interview answered anything. It gave clarity on many things but oompa went wayy too soft on him. Jimmy needs to do an interview with someone who will be actually confrontational.
Ikr? And don't forget to mention his attitude during the interview. I couldn't even finish it, a grown man just passing responsibility on everyone else is absolutely ridiculous. Oh wait he is a manchild not an adult actually 😂 He stayed quiet for months, too late, too little, and laughable.
Jimmy will never do an interview with someone like coffeezilla or anyone that will be confrontational and give an actual interview. He doesn't want someone who isn't afraid to ask the hard hitting questions that he isn't comfortable with and go for the throat. He doesn't want someone that will push back and question or call out his manipulation tactics or talking around the issues. He wants a puff piece to try and make himself look good and look like he is acknowledging the problems and taking accountability while not really doing either of those.
I watched Dogpack, Soggy, and even Asmon's response. This is what I can gather. 1) The hiring of offenders is something that definitely happened, but as mentioned, it was likely to be a mistake rather than something outright malicious. By that point it was already too late to change his employment status. 2) The thing with Ava did happen. MrBeast obviously didn't support that behavior, my question is did he actually actively attempted to cover it up? 3) Soggy did not address the allegations of Lacoya Hill. There have been allegations, none of which have been conclusively proven as of now. It is not conclusive he is innocent either. 4) Mr Beast reportedly claimed that the videos did not use CGI. Dogpack proven that he did use CGI in multiple instances. Soggy's counter was that the CGI was done as a stylistic and aesthetic choice, rather that outright falsifying the content. The point still stands that CGI was indeed use, and no clear disclaimer had been given. Soggy also did not address the hospital CGI, which gave the impression the hospital was built from the ground up, when in actuality solar panels were installed. I am sorry, but I think Soggy is the one doing the misrepresentation here. 5) Soggy used the interview and recording of Lacoya firing Dogpack as this big gotcha moment, when in reality, if he wish to prove malicious intent, wouldn't it make more sense for Dogpack to go after Lacoya instead of MrBeast. 6) In addition, the reason for Dogpack's firing is not stated. All we have are testimonies saying it was depressing to work with him. I happen to have autism, and let's just say, I recognize someone with the same symptoms. Are you absolutely certain his firing has absolutely nothing to do with his autistic behaviour? 7) The illegal gambling, I can believe it, it was a mistake. Is it a scummy practice for Mr Beast to scream out GUYS WE'RE LOSING MONEY when he is actually raking millions? Yes. Was it illegal? No. 8) One of the worst things you can do at a time of public scrutiny, is to join Logan Paul. Just by association, he gave people convenient bullets. He might as well have shown a video of himself kicking a puppy.
9) If I went through something extremely unpleasant, the staff came up to me and said, "That's a war crime bro," that's the first thing I will forever remember in my brain, not the "just kidding LOL" that comes seconds later. That's what happened in Waddle's mind. He didn't think it was a joke, he registered that as the truth.
2. Did he actively attempt to cover it up? What evidence or reason do you have that makes you believe he did? 4. CGI being used is common place, why are you so hung up on its usage? This video you are watching uses CGI lol, I don't see any warning label. "Mr Beast reportedly claimed that the videos did not use CGI." This isn't even true, he said that his videos use some CGI. MrBeast addressed the hospital CGI, idk why you need to hear it from Soggy. 6. If he was fired for having autism, that would be illegal. It probably didn't happen, and if it did, Dockpack would have mentioned it himself. The fact that he didn't, tells us that he was trying to hide this.
@@xx_amongus_xx6987 2) Cover it up may mean something like Beastmom dismissing the complaint etc. The only evidence of the coverup that exists to my knowledge is the scrubbing of the severs Ava was in. 4) There is a clear distinction between we never use CGI, and we only use it to enhance our videos. I distinctly remember Mr Beast claim to NEVER, but honestly, I cannot find the exact claim now, so I will have to look for it first. Yes I am aware "trust me bro" doesn't cut it. 6) This is the part where I call complete bull. No one with autism or adhd is ever fired for that reason. It's because he was talking to himself, not immediately responding to emails, pacing about at his workplace, typing too loudly, etc. Of course Dogpack didn't mention this, this is my point. My point being people with autism have been "let go" with the most bs reasons in existence.
Again my comment was deleted 2) Cover it up may mean something like Beastmom dismissing the complaint etc. The only evidence of the coverup that exists to my knowledge is the scrubbing of the severs Ava was in. 4) There is a clear distinction between we never use CGI, and we only use it to enhance our videos. I distinctly remember Mr Beast claim to NEVER, but honestly, I cannot find the exact claim now, so I will have to look for it first. Yes I am aware "trust me bro" doesn't cut it. 6) This is the part where I call complete bull. No one with autism or adhd is ever fired for that reason. It's because he was talking to himself, not immediately responding to emails, pacing about at his workplace, typing too loudly, etc.
Again my comment was deleted. 2) The only evidence of the coverup that exists to my knowledge is the scrubbing of the severs Ava was in. 4) There is a clear distinction between we never use CGI, and we only use it to enhance our videos. I distinctly remember Mr Beast claim to NEVER, but honestly, I cannot find the exact claim now, so I will have to look for it first. Yes I am aware "trust me bro" doesn't cut it. 6) No one with autism or adhd is ever fired for that reason. It's because he was talking to himself, not immediately responding to emails, pacing about at his workplace, typing too loudly, etc
It might be not that important, but I really didn't like his answers when it came to the moldy cheese. "These are factors that we cannot control, it's because of the transportation and care that it got spoiled. When we ship it out, there's no mold in it." Of course there's no mold during export, mold develops over time. Even slight touch or not properly cleaned equipment for cutting can affect the cheese. Not talking about a weak seal in the packaging itself(maybe the compartment for the cheese wasn't clean enough). Put the cheese into a seperate package, seal it by vacuum and close it tight. The probability of mold will probably get lower. Using a "cheese product" is also a possibility, if you want to keep your food from getting spoiled. BUT you have a REAL cheese. Therefore more precautions are needed when it comes to hygiene. Just my thoughts...
Video reviews already showed the defective part of the packaging where the adhesive applied for the seal didn't fully cover the compartment where the cheese is placed. So of course it gets moldy. MrBeast decides to play dumb and make fun of people on his podcast instead. Dude refuses to take accountability for anything, and in this case, he could have done so and state he'll take steps to fix it. If he did this, then it wouldn't be that big of an issue. But no, his default is play dumb and make fun of people.
@@XBluDiamondX Well yeah, I said that there's a possibility of a weak seal. That's why I recommended to put it into another bag/packet or whatever and then put into its compartment.
It's literally impossible to make sure none of your products have mold. Thats just expecting jimmy to be superman or smh Lunchables had mold, lunchly had mold, literally any food brand had mold.
@@throwawaychannel4807 then he gotta take precautions so it won't happen. Don't you think it looks kinda lazy and weird, that the cheese is just thrown into it ESPECIALLY when it's got more humidity compared to dried peperoni, piece of "pastry"? How come ketchup is sealed and cheese is not?
The most disgusting part of this whole thing is people buying this bs (judging by the like/dislike ratio) and Mr Beast will be off the hook soon enough.
Welcome to populism, people will forget how much sweepin Mr. Beast did for the past three months and they just gonna compare Soggy and Doggy for the rest of the year.
the people buying his bs are overwhelmingly kids and paid sweepers, he was always going to get off the hook (not counting the legal troubles, that stuff we will have to wait and see)
It depends on what you mean "off the hook". If you mean closing shop, that's not happening. Beast is not going out of business, there will always be children and brainrotted adults who will buy into his act, accept it and continue watching as if nothing has happened. And he makes enough money from them to influence key players to let him be. He is not getting cancelled. However, if you mean change of general public perception, he is not getting off the hook. His fake "altruist saint" persona image has been shattered for good. People would scrutinize him more harshly in the future. Which would probably have effect on his businesses going forward.
I really wanted Oomps to ask about the claims about the hiding delawares face and not letting them near minors and still claiming to not know he was a pedo but those were two points that were never raised in the interview.. only the name was discussed hastily..
Did you not see the Soggy Cereal video? He didn't hide Delawares face everytime because you can see him when Jimmy hires him from an actual best buy. You can STILL watch that video too. Jimmy assumed Best Buy wouldn't hire a pedo and guessed wrong when he did so. You have to lie about him just as much as Dogpack404 did.
@TheMonkePrince they suddenly started to hide his face after not doing so also changing the name they called him in the videos, mate, if you don't find that very god damn suspicious theres something wrong with you..
@@elitereptilian200 Where are the videos that have his face covered up? I’ve only seen 1 clip from the same episode reused to say they kept him in a mask. Meanwhile you can see he’s out of the mask 2 videos layers but sure.
Jimmy downplayed just about everything. The solitary confinement thing was really bad and they didn’t mention running the marathon and how his feet were all jacked up. Didn’t mention the toilet competition how the dudes skin was falling off. A lot of the things was jimmy saying “I was young” “I was ignorant” “I didn’t know”
Why does that tell you he is full of shit? These are words that are commonly said on this channel. It is true that Dogpack pushed out a lot of mis and disinformation.
@@REBELS24able They are propaganda terms. "True" and "false" (or "not true"), "accurate" or "inaccurate" are the words to use. Saying it's 'disinformation' is saying that the originator is engaging in propaganda and that _nothing_ they say should be believed. He's saying "everyone is lying about me, I am the only source of truth." Mr Beast knows _precisely_ what he is doing and thus, is, in my view, not to be trusted at all. It would not surprise me, at all, if he's a sociopath.
Even for the proof that he used to prove he used unions, just keep in mind that all he provided was a Wikipedia article. That's it. No screenshots of any sort. Nothing. The least you can do is to screenshot a document or at least a banking transaction proving something. A Wikipedia article I'm sure doesn't fly with most people.
To understand the type of person Oompaville is, four days ago he published a video called "I'm retiring" in which he states he is just launching a video game and not, in fact, retiring. With that in mind, how can anyone trust this dude to make an actual interview?
This means nothing, so many people have done that bit, its just a bit. Doesn't mean Oompa is suddenly untrustworthy, you using it that way puts your intention into question. Oompa is fine, just some youtuber who makes alright videos. Beast however is a malicious liar.
imo oompa isnt a shady person or a shill. He just likes to make watchable slop and be entertaining, but he's bad at pressing hard questions himself and prefers to be chill and laid-back, like this one. instead of being an interrogation interview it just becomes an uncomfortable podcast episode. I hope he just realizes that he's not good at this thing and next time when a high-profile controversial person reaches out to him like this, he should know to decline or instead it will just be giving that person free PR using his channel.
This is so dead on accurate. Thank you for having the courage to call it exactly what it was. I mean could he have throw any more softball questions at him. You blantley skip some of the biggest things. Then wanna ask over the phone....WEAK! great sruff keep it up
Even if we assume that EVERYTHING that dogpack404 said isn't true (which for the record I don't believe) the stuff that Jake said about his own experiences is enough to shut Mrbeast down.
It wasn’t an outside investigation. Same company sent c&d’s beforehand so they already had professional duty to best represent client. It’s a better look to get a new firm and have an investigation only contract AND relinquish control of final product approval and publication. That’s not what happened at all here but the public won’t understand that so yeah it will work
SIR, YOU ARE THE GOAT! I just knew you would not buy his BS half-baked responses! Seriously THIS is the only video that is worth watching about that lame interview.
This is how I imagined a Jimmy response would be like. The real problems aren't going to go away. Thanks for helping me digest this puff piece. (No offense to oompa)
@that’s not the point. The problem with Soggy is that his whole video “exposes lies” by simply retelling views from other employees. So it is essentially him trusting the words of his sources more than ones that went to Dogpack. Like you cannot say “I proved Dawson lied” by using the same methods as him and his own opinion. Plus, Soggy was paid by mrbeast for the useless interviews and him not disclosing this is super sketchy imo
@@Lephiz you guys are missing the points, dogpack brought out some allegations, and Jimmy's response was no reponse, then he started deleting old lottery videos, going back to old videos to delete the shadman poster, I as i guess many others took dogpacks videos with a grain of salt, It was Mr Beast's shady behavior that convinced me, sure Soggy proved that dogpack got things wrong or lied and he should be criticized for that, but that does not absolve Jimmy for the things he still have not addressed or the shady things he has been doing, also does not help that Soggy was paid by Mr Beast team, and that he then starts Dm'ing people Soggy's video, while still not addressing anything himself. Edits: I also forgot to add that he ignored Coffeezilla and dodged the interview with MorePegasus, probably because they would have been way more criticical, and would have pushed against the non answers.
@@ElementVoidX Everyone forgets Discord server leaks that are not tied to dogpack at all and are damning enough, even though we never saw what was happening on an easily accessible but deleted nsfw channel...
Yeah he basically got a free vacation and somehow got in contact with employees that dogpack couldn't yet people suck soggy off trying to say he owned dogpack, no the fuck he didn't, his credibility is ruined and his points are dogshit
Yeah, i also thought i was going crazy when Soggy (never heard of him till now), and then an Oompa interview basically right after with pretty much zero push. Looks like Jimmy is taking the Drake angle of ignoring the big allegations and handling the ones that dont matter.
Thank you for discussing this! I watched Oopma's video in full and I felt like things were off, but I couldn't quite put my finger on it. I did notice that the word "transparency" was said way too many times and that bothered me.
First time watcher and wanted to say thanks, I appreciate you taking the time to actually break this down. Other channels which I ended up unsubscribing from including Oompa, just seem to want to laugh and mock and not actually address or start a serious conversation about these allegations. So again, thanks for not making this a huge joke for views and subs.
Saying that faking the construction of an entire hospital for poor african people is just a "silly mistake" is plain disgusting. specially when he says "it only happen once" and we know that is not true
Thank you for this valuable perspective. I still wanna know what happened to the whole Fake Signature shirt stuff, cause that was the most blatant piece of evidence that I have not seen addressed a single time, at all, in any capacity. And so I am very skeptical of everything else.
You can clearly tell who is in a position of power in this interview by looking at their postures. Oompaville is tense, sitting up, leaned forward, hands and knees together like he is afraid to get slapped or be yelled at. Meanwhile Mr. Beast is fully open, reclined, one leg up, both legs spread open. That is the posture of confidence and knowing that you have nothing to be afraid of. Ideally in an investigative you'd have the interviewer poised and attentive, not necessarily aggressive but ready to spring to attention and pick apart little statements that might not add up, while the other side is slightly defensive.
Other people pointed out how Mr. Beast has one leg up on the table in front of him, and now I can't stop noticing it. It comes off as super disrespectful, especially since this is not his home or his studio. Imagine someone coming to your place for an interview and doing that. Intentional or otherwise it looks like a power move.
@@jakzine540 Oh yeah, not saying he's trying to intimidate/impress oompa, just that he is way too casual and relaxed for a topic like this. There is no need to be powerplaying on oompa because he is already very ... polite in the way he conducts his interviews.
@@Bloodfencer1990 Thus my assessment that Oompa is a paid bitch and Beast is a narcissistic nutcase trying to show off for the viewers. You're absolutely good, friend, no worries.
his response doesnt need to be good... because he has youtube and all of its dependent-shills; simping for him and validating his goofy attempts at deflecting criticism.
17:30 in my opinion you’re reading into this part wrong. It sounds like someone made an accusation that cannot be proved and no one on the crew has copped it. and he’s giving Girl the benefit of the doubt, saying he believes her but it’s unprovable. That’s how that part reads to me.
Lol. turns out the crypto questions at the end were sent to Oompa from Coffeezilla. No wonder they were some of the few questions that had Mr Beast sweating.
@aardwolf6668 much like mr beast using oompa to sweep for him, oompa and some ordinary gamers swept for nux after his shadman and loli justifications came to light
What a nimrod. He spoke to the guy a couple times then found out about Shadman's worst stuff and never spoke to the creep again. Ofc his friends would stand up for him in that situation
That interview was almost 3 hours of obfuscation. I simply couldn't make it through the video, so thank you for summarizing it. Completely agree with the conclusion too, sadly, he's going to come out of this unscathed. He simply makes much money for too many people and companies. 😞
Hey, few things. 1. The point with the eye surgeries and the Blue seas were, "Hey this is impressive, and while he did help out, they were a lot less involved then what was advertised." In the Seas example, it was literally, "This is impressive, but given the resources and money put into it, it's a LOT less impressive then advertised." 2. Legal Eagle covered this in his video, but the Lotteries are likely not illegal due to North Carolina Law. The point of that, was to say how these lotteries are being targeted towards kids, and less so on the legality. DogPack, despite saying it multiple times, even says, "I am not a lawyer," multiple times, hence the focus on the second half. 3. Soggy Cereal's video was horrendous as well. While it was criticizing DogPack, multiple times it hyper fixated or focused too much on small points while ignoring the actual points being presented. Jake Weddle having to run on a treadmill for a marathon barefoot during the isolation thing, Delaware/Jefferson rumors suggesting that other people knew about Jefferson's past yet somehow Jimmy didn't, and more. Past that, yeah, this hits everything I thought too.
This was a GREAT video, thank-you for calling out the softball "interview" that Oompa posted where he essentially sought to give Jimmy a "pass" for his years worth of deceptive, illegal & criminal behavior. Oompa didn't hold him accountable at all, it was essentially a video full of, "fluff" per usual w/him... ACTUALLY, Oompa did worse than not hold him accountable, he help put forward allegations with no fact checking. (Accusing the mods of the TH-camDrama sub of being anti- Mr Beast and all that jazz) It's pretty curious how Soggy got outed for taking money for a flight and hotel, and Oompa was willing to put out allegations without so much as a simple message to the people being accused. I wonder why Mr Beast is choosing to talk to the people he's talking to?
Ain't no way Mr Beast did not know about the shadman art. The art piece without any context whatsoever, is pretty vile on its own. He was also recorded at least 2 times with that drawing on the side. He has no excuse for this. You don't just keep this art and have an excuse that you did not notice it among the ton of your other anime posters. Imagine that you have a lot of anime posters and suddenly you see one(which Beast has) your friend put up that you don't know shit about. And this drawing is so disgustingly different from others, surely you would ask your friend about the source of the drawing or which anime was it from right? And knowing how vocally Ava supported Shadman, she would have named the source without hesitation.
Nothing screams "TOTALLY LEGAL AND LEGIT LOTTERY" more than a refund option. That's why I take my losing powerball tickets back to the gas station after the drawing to get my money back 😂
It's pretty clear that Mr. Beast is media trained and had an half truth for every actual issue. Then he focused on every single non issue. He picked a TH-camr that recently got scammed out of hundreds of thousands of dollars for a glorified drop shipping scam OVER DISCORD. I am sorry but how can anyone listen to this and not realize what is going on here? Literally almost anyone other creator would have pressed on the issues of deleting footage and crypto scamming. Softball interview is putting it lightly, this was a planned out media blitz on the weakest link.
Very good analysis! It's easy to downplay something by saying you're an idiot, but it's exactly what that is - downplaying. If you're fit to run a company that reaches out to millions of people, you can't be an idiot.
He looks extremely weird too. I never had to look at his face that much before this interview, but age/stress has definitely hit him hard it seems. .... not surprising given his career trajectory but yeah, just my thoughts from watching. Also, weird pants.
He def seems like that kid that wasn't popular in hs but he tried everything he could to be so and now that he made a successful TH-cam brand that he's better than anyone else because of his popularity. More and more I believe he's nothing but a joke. I used to respect him for the good things he's done because I thought he was doing them for good reasons with selfishness just being a secondary thought but I'm definitely seeing it's the other way around and it's disgusting.
This interview was also terrible because peoples' memory spans are so terrible these days that it'll probably be enough to make most people forgive/stop caring...
Mr Beast has always been so annoying. I remember when I first started hearing about him I thought he was insanely cringe and he just got cringier as time went on.
My theory is he is using smaller well liked tubers as a way to look humble and normal. When really he wouldn't put them out if they were on fire. But he chose oompa bc of the candy connection. I think he promised oompa help with his candy. Either buying it selling it. Pushing it. Suppliers or distributors but some promise to help his brand by a bigger tuber and oompa sucked the third leg of beast to get his candy big.
The Men Vs Women Survival bit a while back gave the women's side straight up ringers that were already experienced survivalist and had participated in Naked and Afraid. Sure the other side had some experience in outdoors but they were not to a survival level. Also the bear stunt near the end was utter trash.
No kidding, everyone already knows the only thing that "Female-Survivalists" do is P*ss & Moan while trying to make friends with something that is meant to be food; just like every other Men vs. Women "Survival" Show.
The fact Mr beast reached out to sloptubers to watch the soggy video is just so sad, instead of addressing the issues he just wants to pull the veil back over our eyes so we see him as “the golden boy”
I literally never heard of this guy or his channel until a couple months ago. It appears his channel is aimed at the young and the ignorant which is probably the reason. But it also occurs to me that, if I was a scam artist, I would also choose to focus my grift on the young and the ingnorant. His deliberate choice of audience type makes him more sus.
Oompa did a sort of pre-quel to his Interview explaining his thoughts getting in, but i wish he did that after the Interview aswell, to Check if he Was successful at his own goals. I would agree, that it very much seemed like in the Phone call that Oompa wanted to be harder on him after not doing that in the Interview beforehand
I know it's probably trivial to a lot of people, but Jimmy sitting there and putting his foot on the table in the room really peeved me. That's disrespectful where I come from. You don't sit in someone else's home and put your shoes on their table. Sit in a chair like a normal person and put your feet on the floor.
Even if it’s non cultural, this type of body language is too laid back and self assured. He literally lacks empathy and does this to show confidence. People who do this often come off as overly confident gloaters who feel like everything is their property. It’s a type of entitlement of someone who is out of touch with situational awareness and respect as it’s not very humbling.
@@C0smiccharm Yeah I feel like a body language expert would say that having his leg up on the table and in front of him like that is a sort of "shield" to feel protected from attacks. But aside from that it's also just the intent behind his actions and it feels like he doesn't respect a normal boundary. But his posture definitely feels over confident and relaxed when he shouldn't feel that way in this situation.
I don't know how much Oompa realizes he fucked up with that video. I didn't see a single comment under his video that was even close to neutral; no one was on his side in the slightest cause it was that apparent to everyone how he basically spent the entire video licking Mr Beast's shoes
Ways to support the channel/special deals.
VPN DEAL: get.surfshark.net/aff_c?offer_id=1448&aff_id=19647
PATREON: www.patreon.com/UEG
LOCALS: upperechelon.locals.com/support
Excellent video!
I watched Dogpack, Soggy, and even Asmon's response. This is what I can gather.
1) The hiring of offenders is something that definitely happened, but as mentioned, it was likely to be a mistake rather than something outright malicious. By that point it was already too late to change his employment status.
2) The thing with Ava did happen. MrBeast obviously didn't support that behavior, my question is did he actually actively attempted to cover it up?
3) Soggy did not address the allegations of Lacoya Hill. There have been allegations, none of which have been conclusively proven as of now. It is not conclusive he is innocent either.
4) Mr Beast reportedly claimed that the videos did not use CGI. Dogpack proven that he did use CGI in multiple instances. Soggy's counter was that the CGI was done as a stylistic and aesthetic choice, rather that outright falsifying the content. The point still stands that CGI was indeed use, and no clear disclaimer had been given. Soggy also did not address the hospital CGI, which gave the impression the hospital was built from the ground up, when in actuality solar panels were installed. I am sorry, but I think Soggy is the one doing the misrepresentation here.
5) Soggy used the interview and recording of Lacoya firing Dogpack as this big gotcha moment, when in reality, if he wish to prove malicious intent, wouldn't it make more sense for Dogpack to go after Lacoya instead of MrBeast.
6) In addition, the reason for Dogpack's firing is not stated. All we have are testimonies saying it was depressing to work with him. I happen to have autism, and let's just say, I recognize someone with the same symptoms. Are you absolutely certain his firing has absolutely nothing to do with his autistic behaviour?
7) The illegal gambling, I can believe it, it was a mistake. Is it a scummy practice for Mr Beast to scream out GUYS WE'RE LOSING MONEY when he is actually raking millions? Yes. Was it illegal? No.
8) One of the worst things you can do at a time of public scrutiny, is to join Logan Paul. Just by association, he gave people convenient bullets. He might as well have shown a video of himself kicking a puppy.
I watched Dogpack, Soggy, and even Asmon's response. This is what I can gather.
1) The hiring of offenders is something that definitely happened, but as mentioned, it was likely to be a mistake rather than something outright malicious. By that point it was already too late to change his employment status.
2) The thing with Ava did happen. MrBeast obviously didn't support that behavior, my question is did he actually actively attempted to cover it up?
3) Soggy did not address the allegations of Lacoya Hill. There have been allegations, none of which have been conclusively proven as of now. It is not conclusive he is innocent either.
4) Mr Beast reportedly claimed that the videos did not use CGI. Dogpack proven that he did use CGI in multiple instances. Soggy's counter was that the CGI was done as a stylistic and aesthetic choice, rather that outright falsifying the content. The point still stands that CGI was indeed use, and no clear disclaimer had been given. Soggy also did not address the hospital CGI, which gave the impression the hospital was built from the ground up, when in actuality solar panels were installed. I am sorry, but I think Soggy is the one doing the misrepresentation here.
5) Soggy used the interview and recording of Lacoya firing Dogpack as this big gotcha moment, when in reality, if he wish to prove malicious intent, wouldn't it make more sense for Dogpack to go after Lacoya instead of MrBeast.
6) In addition, the reason for Dogpack's firing is not stated. All we have are testimonies saying it was depressing to work with him. I happen to have autism, and let's just say, I recognize someone with the same symptoms. Are you absolutely certain his firing has absolutely nothing to do with his autistic behaviour?
7) The illegal gambling, I can believe it, it was a mistake. Is it a scummy practice for Mr Beast to scream out GUYS WE'RE LOSING MONEY when he is actually raking millions? Yes. Was it illegal? No.
8) One of the worst things you can do at a time of public scrutiny, is to join Logan Paul. Just by association, he gave people convenient bullets. He might as well have shown a video of himself kicking a puppy.
9) If I went through something extremely unpleasant, the staff came up to me and said, "That's a war crime bro," that's the first thing I will forever remember in my brain, not the "just kidding LOL" that comes seconds later. That's what happened in Waddle's mind. He didn't think it was a joke, he registered that as the truth.
I watched Dogpack, Soggy, and even Asmon's response. This is what I can gather.
1) The hiring of offenders is something that definitely happened, but as mentioned, it was likely to be a mistake rather than something outright malicious. By that point it was already too late to change his employment status.
2) The thing with Ava did happen. MrBeast obviously didn't support that behavior, my question is did he actually actively attempted to cover it up?
3) Soggy did not address the allegations of Lacoya Hill. There have been allegations, none of which have been conclusively proven as of now. It is not conclusive he is innocent either.
4) Mr Beast reportedly claimed that the videos did not use CGI. Dogpack proven that he did use CGI in multiple instances. Soggy's counter was that the CGI was done as a stylistic and aesthetic choice, rather that outright falsifying the content. The point still stands that CGI was indeed use, and no clear disclaimer had been given. Soggy also did not address the hospital CGI, which gave the impression the hospital was built from the ground up, when in actuality solar panels were installed. I am sorry, but I think Soggy is the one doing the misrepresentation here.
5) Soggy used the interview and recording of Lacoya firing Dogpack as this big gotcha moment, when in reality, if he wish to prove malicious intent, wouldn't it make more sense for Dogpack to go after Lacoya instead of MrBeast.
6) In addition, the reason for Dogpack's firing is not stated. All we have are testimonies saying it was depressing to work with him. I happen to have autism, and let's just say, I recognize someone with the same symptoms. Are you absolutely certain his firing has absolutely nothing to do with his autistic behaviour?
7) The illegal gambling, I can believe it, it was a mistake. Is it a scummy practice for Mr Beast to scream out GUYS WE'RE LOSING MONEY when he is actually raking millions? Yes. Was it illegal? No.
8) One of the worst things you can do at a time of public scrutiny, is to join Logan Paul. Just by association, he gave people convenient bullets. He might as well have shown a video of himself kicking a puppy.
I watched Dogpack, Soggy, and even Asmon's response. This is what I can gather.
1) The hiring of offenders is something that definitely happened, but as mentioned, it was likely to be a mistake rather than something outright malicious. By that point it was already too late to change his employment status.
2) The thing with Ava did happen. MrBeast obviously didn't support that behavior, my question is did he actually actively attempted to cover it up?
3) Soggy did not address the allegations of Lacoya Hill. There have been allegations, none of which have been conclusively proven as of now. It is not conclusive he is innocent either.
4) Mr Beast reportedly claimed that the videos did not use CGI. Dogpack proven that he did use CGI in multiple instances. Soggy's counter was that the CGI was done as a stylistic and aesthetic choice, rather that outright falsifying the content. The point still stands that CGI was indeed use, and no clear disclaimer had been given. Soggy also did not address the hospital CGI, which gave the impression the hospital was built from the ground up, when in actuality solar panels were installed. I am sorry, but I think Soggy is the one doing the misrepresentation here.
Oompa: did you do it
Jimmy: no
Oompa: ok you're good
Seriously, like huh?
Read the document in the description
That implies he even asked
no no no.
oompa.. i like beast.(6 months ago)
oompa...ohhh Beast.. illegal lotterieS ?? ( 5 months ago)
oompa.... OHH sh1tee.... HIRED.. DELEWARE THEN RE-HIRED THEN RE-HIRED TO EXECUTIVE? OHHH (4 MONTHS AGO)
oompa... OHH DIDN'T PAY 8 MONTHS TO ... NOWWW.. DIDN'T PAY THE BLIND SURGERIES UNTIL A VIDEO FROM.. THEM.. OH MY GOSH... (3 MONTHS A)
oompa..... OHHH... CRYPTO SCAM VIDEO FROM..... COFFEE ZILLA... LEGIT DUDE.. HE HAD BIT QUESTIONS TOO... BEAST IS NOT CLEAR (1 MONTH)
THEN... oompa.. interview with 20 NEGATIVE VIDEOs on BEAST.... HE DEF want to SUCK him off now.. cuz its "BEAST"... so he does the 58 YR old mike tyson.. TRICK on us...
OOMPA INTERVIEW WITH BEAST .. HEADS ON.... "you do it?" ... "NAH MY TEAM DID IT"..... "oh ok".... PEACE GUYS.. GIVE ME MILLIONS VIEWS. ( I'M unsub'd completely now OOMPA).
There is a document linked under Oompa's video with the proof and evidence provided by Mr. Beast.
Mr.Beast apology tour is so obvious it's very cringe.
I can't wait to watch Asmongold reacting to moistcr1t1kal's and someordinarygamers' reactions to uppereschelon's reaction to mr beast's reaction to the allegations
I wanna know the PR team fr
@Dydase-29 since you're so great tell me how would you have done it?
PR firm making bank
He didn't say 'sorry' ONCE
You hit the nail on the head dude. I thought I was going crazy, like how was i the only one not being manipulated by this? It's very clear he took all of this time to plot the perfect way to herd sheep back into his wallet.
Nah, not near the only one. I hardly ever watch Jimmy but I've never seen him so nervous and talking so fast before. 😂
No amount of money can help him if he keeps making these big mistakes that affect his reputation. Money talks but not that loud 😅
Oh my god same, they swept so many of the claims under the rug it's insane...
The entire Soggy Cereal video was "debunking" superfluous claims or debunking portions of the claims that were not the main substantive complaint at all...
For one example, the "war crime" claim. No one was seriously claiming Mr Beast committed an ACTUAL war crime. There weren't crimes committed and it wasn't during a war, so for the "debunk" to be "well he didn't commit war crimes" is nuts.
The main substance of that complaint was the inhumane treatment of a contestant and the lack of proper procedure on behalf of the production team to ensure his mental and physical well being. To sweep all that under the rug by just saying "well it wasn't a war crime" as if THAT'S what people were actually saying is just so disingenuous.
And every single one of the "debunked" claims were treated in the exact same manner by both Mr Beast and Soggy Cereal.
Idk to me it sounds like he didn’t take any time at all. All of his responses are just need your reactions. Anybody could have come up with the first week of the controversy. you know what I mean? They had all this time to come up with an actual defense rather than just deflect.
I think one point that can't be easily proven is that he might be a clinical psychopath, which would explain why he doesn't empathize with conversations about others being in pain, and can seem very eloquent and even smart, since he learned how to do it. It's impossible to read a person like that because there is no true empathy or "humanity" there. Also, all psychopaths are narcissists as well, and he does base a lot of arguments on himself or how it affects him. It's just a possibility though...
Yea Oompaville is not good at these types of interviews, he tries to be way too polite and it ruins the whole thing with everyone he interviews.
That's why he chose him No?
@@nojabhere oh for sure
Yeah basically just a fence sitter like Ludwig and those other famous streamers
Calling Beast on the telephone and not asking those quintessential questions face-to-face disavows his politeness
I mean dude's a wet blanket of a person. Has the worst takes, unfunny as shit and just all around seems like a terrible person.
Things missed in UpperEchelon:
-Soggy's creditability in the video is very shaky with the following: A false character assassination towards Pegasus (video would be edited because of it), a false pedo accusation towards Camnugget (video clip would be deleted and apologized), and the paid interviews
-The eye surgery and mold aren't just footnotes since the eye surgery shows bad management towards charities and the mold is a food risk. Both were pretty much answered with "It happens."
I would like to see you try to manage to do either of those, while making videos for 3 channels, managing 2 companies, and trying to have a life.
@@greendino1310 Way to deflect, must have learned it from your master Jimmy.
He also cried about recording consent in North Carolina which is a 1-party consent state anyways.
@@greendino1310 The point is if you are gonna do something then do it right and make sure is gets handled correctly. If you have so much on your plate that you can't do it correctly then don't do it.
If his defence is "I'm making videos for 3 channels, managing 2 companies, and trying to have a life.", then don't fucking do it if its gonna be done badly.
The thing about the mold too is that, apparently, Beast Burger also had mold in it’s food. You can chalk up the first time to mismanagement, sure, but the fact that mold was still an issue in Lunchly, not only shows a severe management issue but it could also suggest neglect.
No disrespect to Oompa, but this was a terrible interview. He takes all of Jimmy's answers at face value and doesn't really delve into any of his non-answers
It feels like damage control, specifically Jimmy trying to swing the pendulum that is the court of public opinion the other way.
Just because Dogpack straight up made some sh!t up, which Soggy disproved, doesn't mean that there isn't still stuff that needs to be adressed
You do realize Oompa was PAID to do this, right? Jimmy wrote the questions he was asked
Honestly once I saw Jimothy just kick his feet up on Oompas table during the interview it lost all credibility in my eyes.
You missed the point of this interview, it wasn't to press Jimmy to the limits which would have been disrespectful, it was to platform him so that he can explain himself, this was like a response video more than an interview, even at the start Jimmy keeps talking about how "I made a video but it isn't my style, I think this is going to be better, I assume this is the correct format for this"
@@Dre2Dee2 Top tier dogpack glazer, you even share similar traits with him, those being lying and theorizing.
@@momomon7662 ... So? First of all, that would be lying regardless Second of all, that doesn't negate the criticisms of the response and the manipulation tactics he's pulling.
1950 out of 2000 and he couldn't find "A single broken bone".
As someone who has heard statistics tweaked by experts before, that sounds like a perfect admission of "So we MIGHT have left fifty people with broken bones, and I'm not saying anything about other kinds of injuries."
He said they tried to reach to them but couldnt
It doesnt matter anyways. He isnt actually trying to say they tried to check 2000 people to see if anyone had broken bones. He is trying to say no one had broken bones in the set.
@@throwawaychannel4807pull jimmy’s pants back up when you’re done
I would go as far as to say that it's highly unlikely that noone broke anything in an event like this with 2000 contestants. If there are lots of physical activities and that many people competing, someone _will_ break something even in the upmost perfectly controlled circumstances. I don't think i was on a single school sports event when i was younger where there wasn't _at least_ one greater injury or a broken bone. So saying that out of those 1950 contestants they couldn't find a single injury is either straight up a lie, or they had the luckiest event in all of history.
@@toastbrot97don't guess. Show receipts. Don't be a defamatory dogpack. Even if there are bones broken, so what? Accidents happen. Cancel culture at its peak
@@user-kf4gt7bo2k Because the allegations were "multiple people had broken bones in the set"
So he said no thats not true. Why would he say shit like "oh one person stubbed his toe" when thats relevant?
He also said if there were any injuries, they wouldnt continue filming. Thats what he said.
DogPack's biases notwithstanding, Mr. Beast needs to address the allegations against him in a serious manner because only explaining one or two circumstances then copping out and dodging accountability for the rest is only going to piss more people off and therefore scrutinize his every action further.
He also didn't address in the beast games about the underwear being stolen and also people wont sue him for no reason there's obviously a base to that
"needs to" not really, he will be very successful in dodging all accountability with the BS he's doing right now. his defenders will signal boost the interview and soggys video to the ends of the world as "CASE CLOSED! HE DROPPED THE MIC AND DEBUNKED IT ALL" and everyone like philly d will push the narrative.
@@i.870idk hate travels louder and faster than love
He doesn't need to address shit for your entertainment. F@@k off.
He needs to take this to court. No more playing games.
literally this, and there is also the serious stuff with the Amazon beast games contestants being hurt and not being given basic needs. There is also illegal lotteries, kris being a disgusting creep, Jake Weddle solitary incident; etc
can always count on upper echelon for a solid level headed critique. great work.
Yummy
I just became a fan.
Except his take on sloppy’s vid, he was paid by Mr beast for a luxury abroad vacation
@@lJ0blixen yes, he was. He still managed to actually show some of dogpack's inaccuracies and a motive (being a disgruntled employee). Not that it changes anything, dogpack clearly and repeteadly mentions that many of the things he says are alleged (to the point of exaggeration sometimes), and at least to me it's always been clear that he was disgruntled and throwing a lot at the wall to see what stuck, and it just turned out most of what mattered seems to have stuck.
Sometimes employees are disgruntled for a good reason.
My issues with Mr Beast are simple: he has allegations against him, some better substantiated than others, and like any allegation, it needs addressing and debunking or owning up to.
What he is instead doing is attempting to punch minute holes into his accuser's credibility while focusing a magnifying glass on those minute holes to make them appear as if they debunk his whole pile of accusations 'because he's not credible/trustworthy'.
This isn't what someone innocent would do. This isn't what someone naive would do. This is what a person who doesn't actually care but wants the 'bad rep' to go away would do. After all, TH-cam is nearly two decades old at this point, IIRC, and we've seen our share of bad apples over that time, and this 'response' has all the same hallmarks of those whom have come before, for instance Fouseytube, former Faze Kay, or Jaystation, don't address anything as that means admitting that there's accusations against you just deflect until it goes away.
(Oh, and Oompaville is just a bad interviewer if you're looking for the interviewee to be pressed on anything).
Goes a bit further than that even imo: Mr Beast has these allegations against him and is deciding to fight them in public by "addressing them" without really making any substantive arguments besides, "The other guy's a big dummy and he doesn't know what he's talking about." It's a gigantic problem when some of these allegations (i.e. the Team Seas one being a great example) seem to be true just based on publicly available information and Jimmy has effectively either ignored them or used attacking the idiotic allegations as a "clear of all wrongdoing" against the ones that seem to have a huge degree of validity behind them.
Jimmy had the option of just not saying anything in the public sphere and if pressed on it, just say, "I'll defer to my legal team on that one." Not exactly the best PR defense but it's a "viable" tactic because it forces people to wait and see what the court of law decides on anything he's being sued over. Fighting it actively in the public sphere requires him to "demonstrate" why the claims are false and debunk them to the Nth degree or it requires him accepting he did poorly and vowing to do better (at least publicly).
Somehow though, Jimmy has actively taken the worst of both paths by attempting to fight this publicly without accepting accountability, without showing details of why claims like the Team Seas ones are false, not deferring to his legal team publicly when it comes to stuff he's being sued over, and most of his defense publicly has been relying on him going after weak claims to say, "See, these ones are obviously untrue so that must mean all of it is untrue."
Man's acting like most trust fund kids (and as bad as the comparison sounds, he's acting almost like Johnny Somali minus the intentionally terrorizing people bits). Stick him with anything and he'll try to avoid accountability. If he can't avoid it, he starts crying foul and tries to have a, "You turned them against me!" type of moment. You can see all these sorts of traits when you see him near anyone who talks bad about his food brand's products. Starts looking like he's been possessed and is an inch from committing to a salt on the person.
Coffee would devour Jimbo like Saturn's son
Hate to break it to you, but Coffee is on Beast's side.
He is reluctant to call a spade by giving Beast implausible deniability.
Coffee thinks he's tough but he's not tough enough to go against guys like these.
Nice refrence.
@@OnTheThirdDay He's reluctant because he doesn't have conclusive evidence. It's called integrity
@@OnTheThirdDay what are you talking about, coffee literally reached out to mrbeast but was ignored. Instead he settled with criticizing mrbeast's crypto scam. Hes not on his side bud.
Its very obvious that Mr. Beast is trying to repair his image and is attempting to use Dogpack as a lynch pin for that, certainly its important to understand that Dogpack wasn't unbiased and didn't do the best job of making the facts clear VS things that were alleged, as well as the overall presentation being very nonchalant... but plenty of those things were very valid and there hasn't been any proper refute of the evidence... The investigation was a complete joke that didnt address any of the core issues either. To me, this just reads like doing a podcast tour to fix his image by focusing solely dogpack.
Yep and I hope dogpack 404 comes out with that last video here soon enough
id go one step further, its not a podcast tour, its mrbeast making "mrbeast defence" content, hes producing and in full control of it all, hes just having other people upload it to their channels and put their name to it to add legitimacy to it.
Unbiased? the guy literally was filled with them to the point of lying just because he got mad he was fired for sucking at his job.
@@matthewmironI don't think he will be able to a lot of his claims have been disproven.
@@DanielJacobs-rz1zl thats a lie mrbeast defenders keep stating to craft the narrative, most of his claims have absolutely not been disproven. mrbeast in this interview alone confirms more of dogpack claims than he disproves.
Jimmy was smart in saying REPEATEDLY that he was “ignorant” and that it’s just what “large companies are like.” He’s stupid however to think that we wouldn’t pick up on that bs.
He takes a page from those running large companies: Answer questions without really answering them.
The, "I'm not a groomer, just a loser" defense, except it's "I'm not malicious, I'm just stupid" instead. Sure, Hanlon's razor is a thing, but that only goes so far.
You have Jake the Viking saying Jimmy knew, Matt turner said he heard of a criminal record as well as providing more context on why Delaware was hired, Jake Weddle said he heard things from water cooler talk, Kris Tyson replying on Jake the Viking on twitter a SCREENSHOT of Delaware RSO record and you have Garrett confirming he was the guy on Dogpack 2nd video voice record and said that's "the rumor". And now you have MrBeast saying he and his Mom (who is the hiring manager), "don't remember"? and that's it?
IDK man thats seems too convenient to say. ¯\_(ツ)_/¯
But you would accept hearsay and rumors? Jake the Viking is clearly unreliable
only in cuckville, usa can you be 16, be persecuted for a crime of having a girlfriend and then be called a pdf for the rest of time. all this in a country that celebrates the most extreme forms of degeneracy ever known to man. all signs of a society that's rotten to the core.
Wow someone that has a grudge against him said something, it must be true. It may it may be not, but we need to start requiring evidence before believing
Ah yes Jake the Viking know Delaware is his brother in law lmao
@@sann7564 more like he is a registered r@pist of a young child and took the plea so he didn’t get done to him what he did to said young girl in prison
coffezilla really messed up mrbeast huh 😂 not 2 week after coffeezilla's take on his crypto history, suddenly theres sponsored soggy content with beast employee which is more on directing hate narrative on dogpack (im not saying he is a good guy) rather than debunking important allegation + background push soggy video to other commentary yutuber, now theres this "oopsie my bad" interview
bros really in panic mode after coffeezilla video, even bringing out the bible
@@tommysaja5106 beast working fulltime catching the momentum, he said so himself "Finally! A video that doesn't spread baseless slander about me lol"
@@tommysaja5106what more he lied after swearing on it, blud is an offense to christianity
@@Ace-me7rq He is an apostate, having abandoned the faith. So the idea of swearing on a Bible means nothing.
@@tommysaja5106 Yeah right as if he is a christian lol, where that signature "conflict between body and spirit" of the average christian? He is literally the type of guy to gain the world but lose his soul lol.
I think this was incredibly irresponsible of Caleb. I think it's just going to do what happened for Dan Schneider, where it'll absolve him for his supporters while taking pressure off of him to make an actual response, taking actual accountability.
I think Oompaville got played like a fiddle
Its easy to play an idiot like a fiddle.
I'm guessing he was paid A LOT of money. That was 100% a scripted interview.
I'm so disappointed in Oompa
I thought he was a genuine guy
Now I'm convinced he's a fraud 😒
@@pettykittyfam yeah… he had muta’s seal of approval by friendship but now I’m questioning everything and everyone :(
I know you shouldn’t have parasocial relationships with yters but I trust muta’s judgement for things. We’ll see how he responds
@@pettykittyfam Nothing to be disappointed about. Oompa has never been a person to shy away from talking to people on both sides of a conversation. You would be an idiot to only listen to one side and wholeheartedly believe everything they are saying. There is nothing wrong with speaking to people to get information from both sides and coming to a conclusion yourself based on the evidence or lack there of from both sides.
I think one of they biggest things that got me about Jimmy's interview, was he used a very big gaslighting technique of the "you wouldn't understand" phrase to dodge around explaining things. There were many times I would hear stuff like " oh well you might not understand this but" or " they might not understand this but" and not explain anything. And I really wish oompaville kinda pushed more at these like " well try me let's see if you can explain it"
I actually lost all respect for Oompaville over that video. It's obvious he's garbage at asking hard questions. This reeks of damage control and silencing critics. I don't fully believe dogpack, but I don't trust a thing mr.beast is saying either. The *best* channel for the interview would have been Coffeezilla or any other interviewer.
I mean, if he's going that soft on Jimmy, it feels like he's just hoping to snug up to the Mr.Beast brand and the potential money he could get through him. Oompa has proven previously that he's not stupid, he should be able to read between the lines and he's not willing to put Mr.Beast on a burner for integrity. This interview does paint Oompa in a bad light.
Didn't oompa just launch a preview for a game that he made? 🤔
it was not at interview, but a space for mrbeast to respond to the allegations. Coffeezilla also only focuses on financial scams and frauds
True but Oompa did say he isn’t a journalist and doesn’t want to imply he is a journalist or a good one. He cleared that up at the start of the video.
I think constructive criticism is what he needs to continue to do more videos as such but I think Mr.Beast took advantage of him.
That’s exactly why Mr beast got interviewed by him, not coffee. Coffee is a great interviewer and it’d be dumb af to willingly do that when you’re guilty
He does not give a flying Fig what his fans or people think. He will just slip off into the sunset with all the millions you silly people gave him and for what?
He's a muppet of the highest level
I know you're right and it pisses me off. 😮💨
Eh he burns money like crazy I doubt he has millions of disposable cash on hand and I don’t think it’s the money that’s driving him it seems more like the fame and the image he’s cultivated of himself as some savior is what he enjoys most
he cares what his fans think, but remember his fans are not us, theyre very young and naive ipad kids. they will buy his defence wholesale (if theyre even aware of the allegations that is)
That guy's true currency is attention. Its what he wants. If it was about the money he has more than enough for generations and he'd have already done what you said. IMO.
Never gave him a single view in my life. Just never truly followed him but his content is not for me anyways.
1:46 before the drama, his reddit page used to be open as well. You could post whatever, comment whatever. But then he had the mods lock it down to video discussion only and comments heavily criticising him were removed.
I completely agree that his ability to coherently and effectively explain his one response only highlights the lies and faux-stupid-nice-guy responses to the other serious allegations.
There's a lot of signs of narcissistic behavior. He both thinks he is playing 4-D chess and can get everyone to believe he's a humble, well-meaning, naïve guy, but he just couldn't help himself to show how smart and well informed he actually is when given the chance.
I remember watching a JRE clip and joe asked him along the lines of "did you think you were ever going to fail" and he just gave the cockiest answer. And i'm not buying the humble, I wear plain clothes and flip flops even though I'm loaded, like how SBF said I still drive my old car and also wore a plain t-shirt. You would look at these people and wonder how they even get anything done, but of course that's part of the lie. Even bill cosby donated a bunch of money to charity before he got thrown into the slammer, either to make himself look good or because he felt guilty AF. Like, even being in the same room as logan paul will tell you all you need to know. Once you know the games these people play, you will be able to cut through the bs and word salad, even if you're not good at reading body language. I just hope that they get their comeuppance.
@@runningwolf2335
Regarding the Cosby question it's both imo. There's the obvious writing off of some amount of their millions for the purpose of laundering their reputations but the cognitive dissonance of feeling guilty while also enjoying and/or reaping the benefits of what they're doing to others only causes them to dig their heels in further and justify their actions by privileging the charity in the minds as if it cancels out their evil acts.
Honestly, I couldn't watch more than 30 minutes. So much of it reminded me of the narcissist's prayer. We know most people at the top of big businesses are or have narcissistic tendencies.
But at the same time, what can we really expect when a person's rise to fame happens during the egocentrism of their teenage years? I'm seeing it more and more on TH-cam. Having faced no consequences for their actions thanks to their fame, they've have no real reality check to burst any inflated sense of ego. He is still young enough that he could change, and 'catch up', but if this interview is anything to go by, I don't think it'll happen.
When Soggy's video came out, I saw Mr. Beast commenting, "finally, a video that doesn't lie about me" or something like that. That was an incredibly arrogant and stupid move to make. I had to double-check if that was the real Mr. Beast (it was), because that looked so bad. Like the villain that needs to brag about their master plan, he couldn't help himself.
I don't think he's cartoonishly evil, but I doubt he's very sorry either. He's probably more concerned about protecting his image and his brand than he is about actually making things right.
@@flarestorm9417 i actually believe he wants his imagine protected because he won’t be able to get sponsors. In the interview, he talked about his Philanthropy Channel which he confirms that he doesn’t own and is a charity. For him to be able to continue doing good, he needs sponsors and donations to continue helping and that’s ultimately his goal. If people believe that his philanthropy channel is a scam or doesn’t actually help people, sponsors won’t want to bring in money.
The PR team Mr. Beast has on the payroll worked with Harvey Weinstein.
Make of that what you will.
They are all connected in one way or another. You just don't become this big overnight for no reason. He's called MrBeast ffs
@nojabhere agreed.
All of them are extremely bad at their jobs and shouldn't be hired???
using all the same very effective tricks. just smear the opposition.
@@i.870 This time they have an army of autistic kids to help, "noo Mr Beast not bad you meanies..!"
Dont ever change bro. The world needs more people like you
lol no, the world needs less ppl who feel "guilty until proven innocent" is an appropriate response.
Jimmy doesn't have to prove anything, the onus is on the accuser and in a court of law, not the court of public opinion.
I think less of UE after watching this, much less.
Subhuman
@@sirtra jimmy does have to prove it innocent by defending his self against the accusations and so far in my opinion he has been doing a piss poor job of it as UE and many other creators have pointed out. Let’s be honest sometime the court of public opinion is better than the court of law, money, power and fame rule this world and with those people can influence the narrative and outcome of things. Two current examples for you, R. Kelly and Diddy lots of people have knew for years that these people should’ve been in jail but why wasn’t they though, money power Fame all things jimmy has.
@lamontbarnes6136 "Let's be honest sometime the court of public opinion is better than the court of law"
No. How old are you? 16?
@@sirtra no I’m not 16 but I am old enough to articulate my point and provide two names to support my argument that you disregarded lol and instead resorting to insult, I can articulate myself once again. Would you like me to provide more example where the court of public opinion knew somebody was a bad person or did something bad thatwasn’t caught or maybe they got away with. I’ll do it anyway, O.J. Simpson, court of law found him innocent What’s your stance on that? hey let’s make it personal. I’m sure you know people that are fycked up individuals or have done some questionable things but to the court of law they’re an upstanding citizen right? They not in jail even though you know they probably should, Maybe a few drug dealers wanna be gang members I’m sure you got these people in your city don’t you?
finally someone who doesn't instantly become a mr beast glazer again.... nuxanor, quintheo, more pegasus... so disappointed in those guys. the way they rolled over because mr beast dm'd them. straight back to clout chasing.
Deeply disappointed in pegasus, he rolled over immediately.
Yep these TH-camrs got awestrucked 😂
why would you be dissapointed on TH-camrs that ONLY love money?
Mr. Beast PAID them to flop, and they did. They always do that, every TH-camr
You don't hate TH-camrs for the scum that they are
Asmongold rolled over for him.
Not sure if you actually watched Quintheo's video on the Oompa video or not, but he still remains pretty critical of Mr. Beast.
He was mainly agreeing that Dogpack made a lot of mistakes that ended up hurting his credibility, but he was also critical of Oompa's interview since he pointed out a lot of the allegations that went unanswered in that video (along with how soft he felt Oompa was on the questions). I may be wrong, but I get the impression that you probably saw the title and thumbnail for Quintheo's video regarding the recent updates and didn't actually watch it, 'cause I got basically zero impression that he became a Beast glazer or something.
As someone who works in HR.. there is no excuse for jimmy having his mother as the head of HR. Especially this long. This should have been corrected years ago. Years. You should not give him a pass on that. It's a big deal. Look into it.
Honest question.
Is the problem simply that she is a family member of Mr beast, or is the problem that she has no credentials [ i.e. manager experience or college degree] and should not be the head of HR?
Don't worry he paid someone to look into it, and it was totally fine 😂
@@CoffeeFresh_both, conflict of interest and unqualified
@@surewhynot6259 BUT SHE IS MORE THAN QUALIFIED LMAO
SHE WAS LITERALLY A FIRST FEMALE WARDEN OF THE BIGGEST US FOREIGN MILITARY PRISON IN GERMANY FOR DECADES
@@Woodsie_Lordjust because you've been in a certain position doesn't make you qualified for another, completely different and unrelated position. Being the "first female warden" for a military prison doesn't make you better at running a production company focused on making videos for children.
What aspects of being a PRISON WARDEN translate into being a good fit for running a TH-cam challenge video channel? The people who work there are not in prison (and shouldn't feel like they are), and the skill set for running a prison doesn't seem to have much overlap with a fun video production company.
I imagine a good warden type to run a tight ship, making sure nothing slips between the cracks. Obviously, that's not the case. So what exactly are her qualifications to be the head of the company? I can see major conflicts of interest, so there's another point against her being in that position, but I'm really not seeing any points in her favor.
The questions were pretty bad. Dude was half asking the question, and half answered it for him
I'm so sick of people like Mr Beast getting away with being awfull, immoral, and criminal. The fact he's started a business with Logan Paul tells me everything I need to know.
Finally!! This is the best cover so far! Majority of people could see straight through this nonsense. In my eyes this just made him look even worse. And FFS his mum was a prison warden and didn't know about background check? Nor how to manage a small company (that time small) PLZZZZ😂😂😂
exactly! other ppls commentary on the interview ended up being so bloody grating bc they just believe everything jimmy said without checking or delving deeper into the claims. it’s almost pointless that the interview occurred in the manner it did. the depth creators like UE have gone into regarding the allegations should’ve been an indicator that a half arsed interview isn’t going to make everything go away
It's dumb to argue that Mr Beast is somehow out of the thickets. Clearing up some small little details do nothing to his credibility. People need to stop complaining about "slop" TH-camrs like Pegasus and focus on the real problem...
Jimmy was afraid of Pegasus.
They abunch of pdfs
What is the real problem?
@@EternalMetaphorI literally don't know. Sure he hired a pedo and SA offender. But there's different between not background checks (bad but mistake). And intentionally hiring them, and joking about. Latter's what they were claiming. before.
@@EternalMetaphor
Beast's content is trite, vacuous, passionless slop. That's enough of a problem for me.
THANK YOU!!! It was so weird watching "the internet" forgive him so easily and acting as if that interview answered anything. It gave clarity on many things but oompa went wayy too soft on him. Jimmy needs to do an interview with someone who will be actually confrontational.
most of "the internet" didn't forgive him to begin with 💀
Ikr? And don't forget to mention his attitude during the interview. I couldn't even finish it, a grown man just passing responsibility on everyone else is absolutely ridiculous. Oh wait he is a manchild not an adult actually 😂 He stayed quiet for months, too late, too little, and laughable.
Jimmy will never do an interview with someone like coffeezilla or anyone that will be confrontational and give an actual interview. He doesn't want someone who isn't afraid to ask the hard hitting questions that he isn't comfortable with and go for the throat. He doesn't want someone that will push back and question or call out his manipulation tactics or talking around the issues. He wants a puff piece to try and make himself look good and look like he is acknowledging the problems and taking accountability while not really doing either of those.
I watched Dogpack, Soggy, and even Asmon's response. This is what I can gather.
1) The hiring of offenders is something that definitely happened, but as mentioned, it was likely to be a mistake rather than something outright malicious. By that point it was already too late to change his employment status.
2) The thing with Ava did happen. MrBeast obviously didn't support that behavior, my question is did he actually actively attempted to cover it up?
3) Soggy did not address the allegations of Lacoya Hill. There have been allegations, none of which have been conclusively proven as of now. It is not conclusive he is innocent either.
4) Mr Beast reportedly claimed that the videos did not use CGI. Dogpack proven that he did use CGI in multiple instances. Soggy's counter was that the CGI was done as a stylistic and aesthetic choice, rather that outright falsifying the content. The point still stands that CGI was indeed use, and no clear disclaimer had been given. Soggy also did not address the hospital CGI, which gave the impression the hospital was built from the ground up, when in actuality solar panels were installed. I am sorry, but I think Soggy is the one doing the misrepresentation here.
5) Soggy used the interview and recording of Lacoya firing Dogpack as this big gotcha moment, when in reality, if he wish to prove malicious intent, wouldn't it make more sense for Dogpack to go after Lacoya instead of MrBeast.
6) In addition, the reason for Dogpack's firing is not stated. All we have are testimonies saying it was depressing to work with him. I happen to have autism, and let's just say, I recognize someone with the same symptoms. Are you absolutely certain his firing has absolutely nothing to do with his autistic behaviour?
7) The illegal gambling, I can believe it, it was a mistake. Is it a scummy practice for Mr Beast to scream out GUYS WE'RE LOSING MONEY when he is actually raking millions? Yes. Was it illegal? No.
8) One of the worst things you can do at a time of public scrutiny, is to join Logan Paul. Just by association, he gave people convenient bullets. He might as well have shown a video of himself kicking a puppy.
9) If I went through something extremely unpleasant, the staff came up to me and said, "That's a war crime bro," that's the first thing I will forever remember in my brain, not the "just kidding LOL" that comes seconds later. That's what happened in Waddle's mind. He didn't think it was a joke, he registered that as the truth.
2. Did he actively attempt to cover it up? What evidence or reason do you have that makes you believe he did?
4. CGI being used is common place, why are you so hung up on its usage? This video you are watching uses CGI lol, I don't see any warning label. "Mr Beast reportedly claimed that the videos did not use CGI." This isn't even true, he said that his videos use some CGI. MrBeast addressed the hospital CGI, idk why you need to hear it from Soggy.
6. If he was fired for having autism, that would be illegal. It probably didn't happen, and if it did, Dockpack would have mentioned it himself. The fact that he didn't, tells us that he was trying to hide this.
@@xx_amongus_xx6987
2) Cover it up may mean something like Beastmom dismissing the complaint etc. The only evidence of the coverup that exists to my knowledge is the scrubbing of the severs Ava was in.
4) There is a clear distinction between we never use CGI, and we only use it to enhance our videos. I distinctly remember Mr Beast claim to NEVER, but honestly, I cannot find the exact claim now, so I will have to look for it first. Yes I am aware "trust me bro" doesn't cut it.
6) This is the part where I call complete bull. No one with autism or adhd is ever fired for that reason. It's because he was talking to himself, not immediately responding to emails, pacing about at his workplace, typing too loudly, etc.
Of course Dogpack didn't mention this, this is my point. My point being people with autism have been "let go" with the most bs reasons in existence.
Again my comment was deleted
2) Cover it up may mean something like Beastmom dismissing the complaint etc. The only evidence of the coverup that exists to my knowledge is the scrubbing of the severs Ava was in.
4) There is a clear distinction between we never use CGI, and we only use it to enhance our videos. I distinctly remember Mr Beast claim to NEVER, but honestly, I cannot find the exact claim now, so I will have to look for it first. Yes I am aware "trust me bro" doesn't cut it.
6) This is the part where I call complete bull. No one with autism or adhd is ever fired for that reason. It's because he was talking to himself, not immediately responding to emails, pacing about at his workplace, typing too loudly, etc.
Again my comment was deleted.
2) The only evidence of the coverup that exists to my knowledge is the scrubbing of the severs Ava was in.
4) There is a clear distinction between we never use CGI, and we only use it to enhance our videos. I distinctly remember Mr Beast claim to NEVER, but honestly, I cannot find the exact claim now, so I will have to look for it first. Yes I am aware "trust me bro" doesn't cut it.
6) No one with autism or adhd is ever fired for that reason. It's because he was talking to himself, not immediately responding to emails, pacing about at his workplace, typing too loudly, etc
It might be not that important, but I really didn't like his answers when it came to the moldy cheese. "These are factors that we cannot control, it's because of the transportation and care that it got spoiled. When we ship it out, there's no mold in it."
Of course there's no mold during export, mold develops over time. Even slight touch or not properly cleaned equipment for cutting can affect the cheese. Not talking about a weak seal in the packaging itself(maybe the compartment for the cheese wasn't clean enough).
Put the cheese into a seperate package, seal it by vacuum and close it tight. The probability of mold will probably get lower.
Using a "cheese product" is also a possibility, if you want to keep your food from getting spoiled. BUT you have a REAL cheese. Therefore more precautions are needed when it comes to hygiene.
Just my thoughts...
Imagine any food company saying that...
Video reviews already showed the defective part of the packaging where the adhesive applied for the seal didn't fully cover the compartment where the cheese is placed. So of course it gets moldy. MrBeast decides to play dumb and make fun of people on his podcast instead. Dude refuses to take accountability for anything, and in this case, he could have done so and state he'll take steps to fix it. If he did this, then it wouldn't be that big of an issue. But no, his default is play dumb and make fun of people.
@@XBluDiamondX Well yeah, I said that there's a possibility of a weak seal. That's why I recommended to put it into another bag/packet or whatever and then put into its compartment.
It's literally impossible to make sure none of your products have mold. Thats just expecting jimmy to be superman or smh
Lunchables had mold, lunchly had mold, literally any food brand had mold.
@@throwawaychannel4807 then he gotta take precautions so it won't happen. Don't you think it looks kinda lazy and weird, that the cheese is just thrown into it ESPECIALLY when it's got more humidity compared to dried peperoni, piece of "pastry"?
How come ketchup is sealed and cheese is not?
The most disgusting part of this whole thing is people buying this bs (judging by the like/dislike ratio) and Mr Beast will be off the hook soon enough.
Welcome to populism, people will forget how much sweepin Mr. Beast did for the past three months and they just gonna compare Soggy and Doggy for the rest of the year.
the people buying his bs are overwhelmingly kids and paid sweepers, he was always going to get off the hook (not counting the legal troubles, that stuff we will have to wait and see)
😂😂😂😂😂 @@i.870
@@wikansaktianto9215 Its also populism to join in the Mr. Beast hate train, where everything he does has an evil ulterior motive lol
It depends on what you mean "off the hook".
If you mean closing shop, that's not happening. Beast is not going out of business, there will always be children and brainrotted adults who will buy into his act, accept it and continue watching as if nothing has happened. And he makes enough money from them to influence key players to let him be. He is not getting cancelled.
However, if you mean change of general public perception, he is not getting off the hook. His fake "altruist saint" persona image has been shattered for good. People would scrutinize him more harshly in the future. Which would probably have effect on his businesses going forward.
I really wanted Oomps to ask about the claims about the hiding delawares face and not letting them near minors and still claiming to not know he was a pedo but those were two points that were never raised in the interview.. only the name was discussed hastily..
Did….did you watch the interview?
Did you not see the Soggy Cereal video? He didn't hide Delawares face everytime because you can see him when Jimmy hires him from an actual best buy. You can STILL watch that video too. Jimmy assumed Best Buy wouldn't hire a pedo and guessed wrong when he did so. You have to lie about him just as much as Dogpack404 did.
@@Mailliwn12 no and i dont think most of this video's audience watched it either
@TheMonkePrince they suddenly started to hide his face after not doing so also changing the name they called him in the videos, mate, if you don't find that very god damn suspicious theres something wrong with you..
@@elitereptilian200 Where are the videos that have his face covered up? I’ve only seen 1 clip from the same episode reused to say they kept him in a mask. Meanwhile you can see he’s out of the mask 2 videos layers but sure.
I didn't even watch that interview, waiting for someone else to cover it, I'm not a fan of either Beast or Oompa. Glad we have you.
Jimmy downplayed just about everything. The solitary confinement thing was really bad and they didn’t mention running the marathon and how his feet were all jacked up. Didn’t mention the toilet competition how the dudes skin was falling off.
A lot of the things was jimmy saying “I was young” “I was ignorant” “I didn’t know”
Oompaville is the new shane dawson, go to him when youve got a bad rep and hell give you a 2 hour long puff piece.
Not the discount dawson, Oompa is just commentary channel like Charlie.
oompaville has fire content
@@AC-ov5ny And he is a trash interviewer.
Wait for the promos of his game on MrBeast.
Just a reminder that soggy cerial was bribed by a mr beast employee (paid flights and hotels)
That's not bribery but yes it's a conflict of interest
@@ILoveTinfoilHats it's a free transatlantic vacation, it would be enough to dismiss someone in court.
@cacovie ok buddy
@@ILoveTinfoilHatsas someone who works in business law, it would be bribery!
@@lJ0blixen paying for business travel is not bribery. You must not be very good at your job.
As soon as he said "mis- and disinformation", I know he's full of shit.
I missed that bit. "Disinformation" implies that it's some kind of evil conspiracy.
But there is a different between mis and disinformation. Whats the issue with being clear on that?
Why does that tell you he is full of shit? These are words that are commonly said on this channel. It is true that Dogpack pushed out a lot of mis and disinformation.
@@REBELS24able who chooses what and which parts are misinformation or disinformation?
@@REBELS24able They are propaganda terms.
"True" and "false" (or "not true"), "accurate" or "inaccurate" are the words to use. Saying it's 'disinformation' is saying that the originator is engaging in propaganda and that _nothing_ they say should be believed. He's saying "everyone is lying about me, I am the only source of truth."
Mr Beast knows _precisely_ what he is doing and thus, is, in my view, not to be trusted at all.
It would not surprise me, at all, if he's a sociopath.
these are ALOT of HUGE counterpoints you made. glad you didnt let it slip
Coffee shouldv done the interview. But he didnt respond to coffee and he didnt do an interview with pegasus. He took the safest bet with oompa
Even for the proof that he used to prove he used unions, just keep in mind that all he provided was a Wikipedia article. That's it. No screenshots of any sort. Nothing. The least you can do is to screenshot a document or at least a banking transaction proving something. A Wikipedia article I'm sure doesn't fly with most people.
Finally, one adult content creator who isn't manipulated like Mr Beast's children. Those other ones turn into sheeps once Mr Beast approaches them.
To understand the type of person Oompaville is, four days ago he published a video called "I'm retiring" in which he states he is just launching a video game and not, in fact, retiring. With that in mind, how can anyone trust this dude to make an actual interview?
This means nothing, so many people have done that bit, its just a bit. Doesn't mean Oompa is suddenly untrustworthy, you using it that way puts your intention into question. Oompa is fine, just some youtuber who makes alright videos. Beast however is a malicious liar.
That's not uncommon. They're all liars. They all use fake titles and thumbnails to get clicks. They consider it part of "the game".
imo oompa isnt a shady person or a shill. He just likes to make watchable slop and be entertaining, but he's bad at pressing hard questions himself and prefers to be chill and laid-back, like this one. instead of being an interrogation interview it just becomes an uncomfortable podcast episode. I hope he just realizes that he's not good at this thing and next time when a high-profile controversial person reaches out to him like this, he should know to decline or instead it will just be giving that person free PR using his channel.
That’s was a joke, others have done it. It’s a known joke making fun of clickbait.
@@creekbird_homesteadI don't think that's the point. The point is he's launching a game, not the title of the video.
Literally Mr beast response to everything:
I didn't know 🥶
With this annoying smile throughout.
The classic, "It wasn't me! It was someone else's fault!" probably slips in a bit into some of his defenses was well.
This is so dead on accurate. Thank you for having the courage to call it exactly what it was. I mean could he have throw any more softball questions at him. You blantley skip some of the biggest things. Then wanna ask over the phone....WEAK! great sruff keep it up
Thanks for this breakdown Upper Echelon. It's good to know at least some TH-camrs have integrity. The intelluctual dishonesty from Jimmy disgusts me.
Because he didn't want to say "I am guilty of shit I didn't do." Retards like you need some bibs.
Even if we assume that EVERYTHING that dogpack404 said isn't true (which for the record I don't believe) the stuff that Jake said about his own experiences is enough to shut Mrbeast down.
It wasn’t an outside investigation. Same company sent c&d’s beforehand so they already had professional duty to best represent client.
It’s a better look to get a new firm and have an investigation only contract AND relinquish control of final product approval and publication. That’s not what happened at all here but the public won’t understand that so yeah it will work
SIR, YOU ARE THE GOAT!
I just knew you would not buy his BS half-baked responses!
Seriously THIS is the only video that is worth watching about that lame interview.
Cry more.
This is how I imagined a Jimmy response would be like. The real problems aren't going to go away. Thanks for helping me digest this puff piece. (No offense to oompa)
Soggy's video was 10% facts, 70% reaching and 20% an interview WITH EMPLOYEES that were obviously told to say certain things
So when dogpack got ex employee's words and its treated as facts but when soggy does its obviously coheresed
and what about dogpacks videos? 100% facts according to you right?
@that’s not the point. The problem with Soggy is that his whole video “exposes lies” by simply retelling views from other employees. So it is essentially him trusting the words of his sources more than ones that went to Dogpack. Like you cannot say “I proved Dawson lied” by using the same methods as him and his own opinion. Plus, Soggy was paid by mrbeast for the useless interviews and him not disclosing this is super sketchy imo
@@Lephiz you guys are missing the points, dogpack brought out some allegations, and Jimmy's response was no reponse, then he started deleting old lottery videos, going back to old videos to delete the shadman poster, I as i guess many others took dogpacks videos with a grain of salt, It was Mr Beast's shady behavior that convinced me, sure Soggy proved that dogpack got things wrong or lied and he should be criticized for that, but that does not absolve Jimmy for the things he still have not addressed or the shady things he has been doing, also does not help that Soggy was paid by Mr Beast team, and that he then starts Dm'ing people Soggy's video, while still not addressing anything himself.
Edits: I also forgot to add that he ignored Coffeezilla and dodged the interview with MorePegasus, probably because they would have been way more criticical, and would have pushed against the non answers.
@@ElementVoidX Everyone forgets Discord server leaks that are not tied to dogpack at all and are damning enough, even though we never saw what was happening on an easily accessible but deleted nsfw channel...
Soggy video wasn't good at all either
Yeah he basically got a free vacation and somehow got in contact with employees that dogpack couldn't yet people suck soggy off trying to say he owned dogpack, no the fuck he didn't, his credibility is ruined and his points are dogshit
I really dont like how he did not disclose that his video was paid by a mrbeast employee (at the time)
Other than that the video was fine
@@alevitatingtrashcan7023 video was also produced by mrbeasts producer, and theres a lot of lies of omission and misleading or straight up lies.
Think some of what soggy said was not true but most of it was true
@@alevitatingtrashcan7023 The video wasnt fine. His response to many accusations was just "MrBeast employee said something else."
Oompa is too nice to interview anyone. You need Coffee or someone else to interview Mr Yeast
Yeah, i also thought i was going crazy when Soggy (never heard of him till now), and then an Oompa interview basically right after with pretty much zero push. Looks like Jimmy is taking the Drake angle of ignoring the big allegations and handling the ones that dont matter.
Thank you for discussing this! I watched Oopma's video in full and I felt like things were off, but I couldn't quite put my finger on it. I did notice that the word "transparency" was said way too many times and that bothered me.
First time watcher and wanted to say thanks, I appreciate you taking the time to actually break this down. Other channels which I ended up unsubscribing from including Oompa, just seem to want to laugh and mock and not actually address or start a serious conversation about these allegations. So again, thanks for not making this a huge joke for views and subs.
Saying that faking the construction of an entire hospital for poor african people is just a "silly mistake" is plain disgusting. specially when he says "it only happen once" and we know that is not true
Thank you for this valuable perspective. I still wanna know what happened to the whole Fake Signature shirt stuff, cause that was the most blatant piece of evidence that I have not seen addressed a single time, at all, in any capacity. And so I am very skeptical of everything else.
theres nothing to address, they were caught "dead to rights" as they say.
Apparently you are allowed other do you signature not against the law but that just me saying thing youtube video said
You can clearly tell who is in a position of power in this interview by looking at their postures. Oompaville is tense, sitting up, leaned forward, hands and knees together like he is afraid to get slapped or be yelled at. Meanwhile Mr. Beast is fully open, reclined, one leg up, both legs spread open. That is the posture of confidence and knowing that you have nothing to be afraid of.
Ideally in an investigative you'd have the interviewer poised and attentive, not necessarily aggressive but ready to spring to attention and pick apart little statements that might not add up, while the other side is slightly defensive.
Massive reach
Other people pointed out how Mr. Beast has one leg up on the table in front of him, and now I can't stop noticing it. It comes off as super disrespectful, especially since this is not his home or his studio. Imagine someone coming to your place for an interview and doing that. Intentional or otherwise it looks like a power move.
Without question Beast is engaging in power-play by posture at LEAST for the viewers of the interview.
@@jakzine540 Oh yeah, not saying he's trying to intimidate/impress oompa, just that he is way too casual and relaxed for a topic like this. There is no need to be powerplaying on oompa because he is already very ... polite in the way he conducts his interviews.
@@Bloodfencer1990 Thus my assessment that Oompa is a paid bitch and Beast is a narcissistic nutcase trying to show off for the viewers. You're absolutely good, friend, no worries.
his response doesnt need to be good... because he has youtube and all of its dependent-shills; simping for him and validating his goofy attempts at deflecting criticism.
17:30 in my opinion you’re reading into this part wrong. It sounds like someone made an accusation that cannot be proved and no one on the crew has copped it. and he’s giving Girl the benefit of the doubt, saying he believes her but it’s unprovable. That’s how that part reads to me.
Fun fact: [ Emphasis on the word *FACT* ] More money does not equal more intelligence.
Lol. turns out the crypto questions at the end were sent to Oompa from Coffeezilla. No wonder they were some of the few questions that had Mr Beast sweating.
Who tf would actually believe Mr Beast?
The Beast rider
His idiot fans and MeatRiders
Stopped trusting oompaville after the nuxtaku situation, and now this solidifies he is untrustworthy.
What happened? I already don't like Oompaville tbh but I never heard of this.
@aardwolf6668 much like mr beast using oompa to sweep for him, oompa and some ordinary gamers swept for nux after his shadman and loli justifications came to light
What a nimrod. He spoke to the guy a couple times then found out about Shadman's worst stuff and never spoke to the creep again. Ofc his friends would stand up for him in that situation
That interview was almost 3 hours of obfuscation. I simply couldn't make it through the video, so thank you for summarizing it. Completely agree with the conclusion too, sadly, he's going to come out of this unscathed. He simply makes much money for too many people and companies. 😞
Hey, few things.
1. The point with the eye surgeries and the Blue seas were, "Hey this is impressive, and while he did help out, they were a lot less involved then what was advertised." In the Seas example, it was literally, "This is impressive, but given the resources and money put into it, it's a LOT less impressive then advertised."
2. Legal Eagle covered this in his video, but the Lotteries are likely not illegal due to North Carolina Law. The point of that, was to say how these lotteries are being targeted towards kids, and less so on the legality. DogPack, despite saying it multiple times, even says, "I am not a lawyer," multiple times, hence the focus on the second half.
3. Soggy Cereal's video was horrendous as well. While it was criticizing DogPack, multiple times it hyper fixated or focused too much on small points while ignoring the actual points being presented. Jake Weddle having to run on a treadmill for a marathon barefoot during the isolation thing, Delaware/Jefferson rumors suggesting that other people knew about Jefferson's past yet somehow Jimmy didn't, and more.
Past that, yeah, this hits everything I thought too.
This was a GREAT video, thank-you for calling out the softball "interview" that Oompa posted where he essentially sought to give Jimmy a "pass" for his years worth of deceptive, illegal & criminal behavior.
Oompa didn't hold him accountable at all, it was essentially a video full of, "fluff" per usual w/him...
ACTUALLY, Oompa did worse than not hold him accountable, he help put forward allegations with no fact checking. (Accusing the mods of the TH-camDrama sub of being anti- Mr Beast and all that jazz)
It's pretty curious how Soggy got outed for taking money for a flight and hotel, and Oompa was willing to put out allegations without so much as a simple message to the people being accused. I wonder why Mr Beast is choosing to talk to the people he's talking to?
Man gives non answers to allegations.
In other news water is wet.
He will be involved in politics next he's just honed his skills
What did you expect from the face of company, exposing their own allegations? Ain't no way Miramax owned what Weinstein did.
@@wikansaktianto9215 I missed the part where Weinstein owned Miramax.
Ain't no way Mr Beast did not know about the shadman art. The art piece without any context whatsoever, is pretty vile on its own. He was also recorded at least 2 times with that drawing on the side. He has no excuse for this. You don't just keep this art and have an excuse that you did not notice it among the ton of your other anime posters. Imagine that you have a lot of anime posters and suddenly you see one(which Beast has) your friend put up that you don't know shit about. And this drawing is so disgustingly different from others, surely you would ask your friend about the source of the drawing or which anime was it from right? And knowing how vocally Ava supported Shadman, she would have named the source without hesitation.
Nothing screams "TOTALLY LEGAL AND LEGIT LOTTERY" more than a refund option. That's why I take my losing powerball tickets back to the gas station after the drawing to get my money back 😂
When you realize Mr beast defence argument is I don't think we did anything bad yall are just exaggerating
"I'll sue you if you said otherwise" type shit.
@@wikansaktianto9215 fr
It's pretty clear that Mr. Beast is media trained and had an half truth for every actual issue. Then he focused on every single non issue. He picked a TH-camr that recently got scammed out of hundreds of thousands of dollars for a glorified drop shipping scam OVER DISCORD. I am sorry but how can anyone listen to this and not realize what is going on here? Literally almost anyone other creator would have pressed on the issues of deleting footage and crypto scamming. Softball interview is putting it lightly, this was a planned out media blitz on the weakest link.
Very good analysis! It's easy to downplay something by saying you're an idiot, but it's exactly what that is - downplaying.
If you're fit to run a company that reaches out to millions of people, you can't be an idiot.
I really don't believe a word that Jimmy says, ever. He really is a very unlikeable person.
He looks extremely weird too. I never had to look at his face that much before this interview, but age/stress has definitely hit him hard it seems. .... not surprising given his career trajectory but yeah, just my thoughts from watching.
Also, weird pants.
He def seems like that kid that wasn't popular in hs but he tried everything he could to be so and now that he made a successful TH-cam brand that he's better than anyone else because of his popularity. More and more I believe he's nothing but a joke. I used to respect him for the good things he's done because I thought he was doing them for good reasons with selfishness just being a secondary thought but I'm definitely seeing it's the other way around and it's disgusting.
@@Styles_Breez he looks ai generated
This interview was also terrible because peoples' memory spans are so terrible these days that it'll probably be enough to make most people forgive/stop caring...
Oopmpaville: "did you refuse to turn off the lights for jake weddle?"
Mr Beast: "We dont know what ither people are comfortable with"
WHAT!!!
Mr Beast has always been so annoying. I remember when I first started hearing about him I thought he was insanely cringe and he just got cringier as time went on.
Oompa definitely got paid a lil sumn for this damage control interview.
Notice how Jimmy admits there have been wrongdoings, but he never once apologizes for any of it. All he did was deflect
That's for his wacko PR team to do 😂
My theory is he is using smaller well liked tubers as a way to look humble and normal. When really he wouldn't put them out if they were on fire. But he chose oompa bc of the candy connection. I think he promised oompa help with his candy. Either buying it selling it. Pushing it. Suppliers or distributors but some promise to help his brand by a bigger tuber and oompa sucked the third leg of beast to get his candy big.
Exactly this
Mrbeast is remarkably dishonest
Always has been
Anyone taking him seriously is sad
I mean he has money tho
Can't take him too unseriously
MrBeast wouldn't talk to Coffeezilla because Coffeezilla is not as soft as Oompaville.
Isnt Oompa supposed to be the guy who calls it like he sees it, and speaks his mind? I wonder why he never asked any gotcha questions.
Oompa didn't "interview" him. He was starstruck and let him just talk about how victimized he is.
You're the only commentary youtuber I know that's worth listening to, keep doing what you're doing.
"I was young therefore not at fault and when I was at fault I didn't do it. My sources? Trust me bro."
His reputation can be as awful as possible and i bet it wont make a difference.
Look no further than the Paul brothers.
I stand with Dogpack! We will get rid of these scummy companies like MrBeast!
The Men Vs Women Survival bit a while back gave the women's side straight up ringers that were already experienced survivalist and had participated in Naked and Afraid. Sure the other side had some experience in outdoors but they were not to a survival level. Also the bear stunt near the end was utter trash.
No kidding, everyone already knows the only thing that "Female-Survivalists" do is P*ss & Moan while trying to make friends with something that is meant to be food; just like every other Men vs. Women "Survival" Show.
Guys, we need to pump this video.
Allegations aside, mr beast just isn’t the nice guy in his videos. He is pretty deceitful and shady.
The fact Mr beast reached out to sloptubers to watch the soggy video is just so sad, instead of addressing the issues he just wants to pull the veil back over our eyes so we see him as “the golden boy”
I literally never heard of this guy or his channel until a couple months ago. It appears his channel is aimed at the young and the ignorant which is probably the reason.
But it also occurs to me that, if I was a scam artist, I would also choose to focus my grift on the young and the ingnorant. His deliberate choice of audience type makes him more sus.
I'd never heard of him either which tells me I'm doing something right.
All his paid puff piece tour is doing is just making me hate him more.
Oompa did a sort of pre-quel to his Interview explaining his thoughts getting in, but i wish he did that after the Interview aswell, to Check if he Was successful at his own goals. I would agree, that it very much seemed like in the Phone call that Oompa wanted to be harder on him after not doing that in the Interview beforehand
I was not impressed by MorePegasus's response.
I don't know if his heart-to-heart with Beast got to him or he is concerned about grtting sued also.
Yea same he favored Jimmy a bit more in the new video ngl
@@denniselroy4517 I was kinda surprised. He was like "It's all good now. Bye."
He probably got a call from Mr yeast himself
@@lJ0blixen He did, it was his second last video on this. That is when his tone changed.
@@OnTheThirdDay 100%
I know it's probably trivial to a lot of people, but Jimmy sitting there and putting his foot on the table in the room really peeved me. That's disrespectful where I come from. You don't sit in someone else's home and put your shoes on their table. Sit in a chair like a normal person and put your feet on the floor.
Even if it’s non cultural, this type of body language is too laid back and self assured. He literally lacks empathy and does this to show confidence. People who do this often come off as overly confident gloaters who feel like everything is their property. It’s a type of entitlement of someone who is out of touch with situational awareness and respect as it’s not very humbling.
@@C0smiccharm Yeah I feel like a body language expert would say that having his leg up on the table and in front of him like that is a sort of "shield" to feel protected from attacks. But aside from that it's also just the intent behind his actions and it feels like he doesn't respect a normal boundary. But his posture definitely feels over confident and relaxed when he shouldn't feel that way in this situation.
I don't know how much Oompa realizes he fucked up with that video. I didn't see a single comment under his video that was even close to neutral; no one was on his side in the slightest cause it was that apparent to everyone how he basically spent the entire video licking Mr Beast's shoes
Oompaville is such an awful interviewer.
To be fair he did say so himself in the video