MetalGarurumon vs Leviamon - BT-15 Matchplay Commentary

แชร์
ฝัง
  • เผยแพร่เมื่อ 14 ธ.ค. 2024

ความคิดเห็น • 16

  • @PWERUP_Pyro
    @PWERUP_Pyro 9 หลายเดือนก่อน +9

    So, the play at the end of game 2 could not happen. In order for Gabumon to warp to Metalgarurumon. Matt must be in play. There was no Matt in play, so Gabu could not warp

    • @HyperColosseum
      @HyperColosseum  9 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

      Yep -- first time for Josh running the deck so i think got a little caught in the sauce but it happens. We will all learn from it

  • @RoyalK614
    @RoyalK614 9 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    You can tell the melga player was new to the deck, but besides a few mistakes some were bigger then others it was a learning experience so good games y’all and thank you👏🏽

    • @joshuajaniec7427
      @joshuajaniec7427 9 หลายเดือนก่อน

      Appreciated. I didn’t play when Melga was originally meta and I typically play SecCon so trying to step out a little bit.

    • @RoyalK614
      @RoyalK614 9 หลายเดือนก่อน

      @@joshuajaniec7427i think it’s great you tried something out of your comfort zone. It’s the best part about the game, to just to learn knew things and have fun.

    • @HyperColosseum
      @HyperColosseum  9 หลายเดือนก่อน

      Thank you for tuning in! Always appreciate the support

  • @linkage.
    @linkage. 9 หลายเดือนก่อน +3

    min. 11:48 metalgaruru X, can't use his second effect, there are no metalgaruru or x-antibody in his sources.
    min. 12:21 metalgaruru can't digivolve on gabumon, no Matt

    • @HyperColosseum
      @HyperColosseum  9 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      yep -- good catch on both and definitely a new learning mistake on melga's part

  • @TonyPino18
    @TonyPino18 9 หลายเดือนก่อน

    In game 2 did the Leviamon player have a Leviamon or Leviamon x in the trash? I felt that they could have use waruseadrsmon and bitting crush a little bit more effectively in the turn.

  • @lazybear427
    @lazybear427 9 หลายเดือนก่อน

    6:46 weregarurumon should not have jamming because he go less digivolutions than leviathan x

    • @HyperColosseum
      @HyperColosseum  9 หลายเดือนก่อน

      Very true - Buka giving jamming probably felt like autopilot at that point

  • @TheNinja4
    @TheNinja4 9 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Gotta allow some redos, if you don't know then you don't know. Once or twice sure but be warned to ASK before doing things. READ CARDS PEOPLE

    • @HyperColosseum
      @HyperColosseum  9 หลายเดือนก่อน

      YES! we are all human but at the same time to take that next step sometimes redos and reading is a necessity. Definitely advocate for locals being an environment where we can all learn from each other and grow together

  • @un_solved5012
    @un_solved5012 9 หลายเดือนก่อน +3

    Judge!!! : While you have a Tamer with [Matt Ishida] in its name and your opponent has a 10000 DP or higher Digimon, one of your [Gabumon] may digivolve into this card in your hand for a digivolution cost of 4, ignoring its digivolution requirements.
    Like ok the deck player clearly knew he was cheating when he went for that play ... the opponent did not know and probably didn't even care ... the worst part is that the commentators didn't say anything about it :/

    • @joshuajaniec7427
      @joshuajaniec7427 9 หลายเดือนก่อน +4

      Ok. 1. I did not know I was cheating. Was literally day 1 with the deck. My bad though

    • @un_solved5012
      @un_solved5012 9 หลายเดือนก่อน

      @@joshuajaniec7427 ok fair fair .