@@VengeanceYT21I'll have to find the German equivalent to taco bell as there isn't one anywhere nearby...so sauerkraut and beans with bacon? Baconkraut?
I have a suggestion: Try to seal the turbine so little to no air can escape! This maximises torque or speed output significantly. Like you should place some kind of substance to seal the turbine so that no air can escape through any open gaps. And the turbine is entirely enclosed except for the pipe air intake. - Riley
I've seen a video of a truck made from lego technic that used a piston engine powered by compressed air. It was very impressive, and I an intrigued to see how a turbine approach will go.
Ah yes, Green Gecko and others have some phenomenal designs. Piston engines I believe are much more efficient and produce much more torque. There's just something about turbines that's really satisfying though!
In order to make a balanced turbine, you need to measure both voltage and current. The higher the current, the more torque it has and the higher the voltage, the higher the speed is.
A small suggestion: Pay attention to the length/radius/diameter of your "air parts". Torque is a measure of force over a distance (Newton on a meter stick, Pound on a 1 foot rod), so if you have large radii being pushed by air, you will be able to make use of more of the energy of the moving air. This means your compressed air will do more work. Notice the results of the "many bladed turbine" compared to the smaller diameter small bladed version. It was the diameter that was affecting your results the most. So, something with a diameter larger than you tested, but with the blade shape of what you ended up using, will get you more power to the gears. On the wheel side, you want smaller wheels to make more use of that torque produced by the turbine. What you have is fine for higher RPM, but you can't get to that RPM with so little torque.
Yeah you're totally right, the efficiency of this one is absolutely awful - I'm sure there's a lot of potential being wasted. It's just a pity Lego doesn't design larger parts that can act as turbines. Building larger ones tends to make them quite heavy. But perhaps this is a job for 3d printing!
Dude the back tires are too big and they need way more torque to spin so try replacing them with smaller ones (the smaller they are less torque is needed)
You're totally right! I didn't include footage of it, but I tried it with smaller wheels (same as the front ones) and it went quite a bit faster from the starting position. But its top speed was a bit slower
New idea just popup in my head: Make a car using a Lego piston ( or bigger version of it ) BUT that Lego piston engine work similar to REAL GASOLINE ENGINE ( u can replace fuel or "gasoline" with compressed air if u want )
As a heads up for cheap good bottles for pressure vimto squash comes in 3L thick bottles that can handle 200PSI which is almost double that regular 2L drink bottles can handle while also being larger. I haven’t played with them under pressure but I have friends who did at uni and for a while there was always vimto squash around
03:17 But in this case, it only was about speed, wasnt it? The only variable for how much voltage you get was the speed of the magnets relative to the coil. Or am I missing something?
Yup, that's right. At first I was interested to simply see what speed we get using different designs. Speed has some utility. But speed doesn't necessarily mean we'll be able to drive a load, which is why the second test was needed. I knew driving a car would need the turbine to overcome some significant resistance. Especially while stationary
@@JamiesBrickJams Ah yes, makes sense. The "engine" needs some torque to get the car going. Just an idea if you do something similar in the future, try to measure the peak force you can pull with the string. Because I think once the car gets going, it needs significantly less power from the engine so it needs less air pressure. But still, very nice video, I enjoyed it a lot! Cheers!
Yeah you're totally right, once it gets going, it can build up to some great speed as the resistance drops. Especially directly from the compressor. I feel like I've seen some torque curves for turbines somewhere - need to see how folks measure that. Good tip, thanks 🙏
Tesla turbine has the same efficiency as conventional turbine when you connect it to power something and it also has a low torque at high speeds because it's spinning really fast ( TH-camr Jonny Q90 made one that spins at over 99.000 RPM 6-7 years ago).
In the case of a small turbine that's powered by airflow, I think my point makes sense. Unlike large aircraft engines with a bypass system for efficiency, this small turbine doesn't have that. It relies directly on the airflow to spin the blades, without internal combustion or a bypass stream. So, the bypass concept from big turbofan engines doesn’t really apply here.
Depends on what kind of jet you're talking about. Large jets have large bypass ratios to maximize efficiency over power. Fighters typically have a super low bypass ratio to maximize power over efficiency
Tip: Great big plastic bottles usually come full of horrible cheap cider! You can pour it down the drain for all it's worth, I really wouldn't recommend actually drinking any.
You really want to encase the turbine: Like the design at 4:33 should be rather decent, but without any housing it just deflects the air away. Simplest would just be a square box of bricks with the turbine vertically in the middle, with a air-inlet at one side at top, and outlet at the other side at the top - to force the air to go through the turbine.
You're right. That was my original idea. And it sort of worked with a brick-built turbine. But for whatever reason, I just couldn't get a circular enclosure to run smoothly. It kept developing speed wobbles and vibrations, which increased the friction a lot. Certainly worth experimenting with further though
Haha and a parachute! No joke though, I love the idea of air brakes. And if using the same tank, the power of the brakes would remain proportional to the power to the engine
Instead of using an actuator, put motor to directly open the airflow. Far doesn't run for a long time,so it won't be a big deal. Or, put a worm gear on a motor and a small gear on the trigger arm
It's certainly possible to do that. However I wanted fine control of the throttle, rather than just on/off. A worm gear driving an arm could certainly work. But at that point, it's really just doing the same job as a linear actuator 😁
@@xmysef4920 I do now! Wish I'd remembered to do that for this project. Thanks for the reminder - it'd be a perfect way to power a smaller, lighter vehicle
@@JamiesBrickJams Oh and also, when testing different turbine rotors like you did in the video, make sure to also try slightly different gear ratios for each turbine, because some may spin slower, but produce more torque, but that torque wouldn’t be used for more power if the gear ratio doesn’t favor it. Just a recommendation!
2:25 - voltage is one thing but as you are applying an electrical load on the generator it will be harder to turn 3:18 - you are part way there, Idk anything about actual electric generator design so someone else would have to chime in
For this one, there was no load, so the generator was essentially 'free wheeling'. If nothing else, the results here are at least internally consistent. But for sure, if adding a significant load, it would create drag. I've made various air-powered generators that all experience massive drag when the load begins drawing power
You try something like a hydroelectric turbine ? Like the one u build but the air exit in the center (on the axis of rotation), and that would create a spiral, it would surely add more torque at the expense of some speed or it could be worse, I don't know, I'm not an engineer, but I am pretty sure that it will be much more efficient and if you are looking to create a vehicle that can carry its own propellant, it is essential to have an efficient engine.
Found this channel by accident, loved it! Subbed. Question: did you consider changing the shape of the output nozzle for the air to match the surface shape of the turbine blades?
Thanks a lot! That's actually an interesting point. I haven't really experimented with that, other than just the pipe, vs the connector piece with the smaller nozzle. The nozzle concentrates it much better. But other shapes (like a flattened nozzle) could be very interesting. Thanks for the suggestion 🙏
AWESOMEEE! love your designs haha random suggestion, lipo pack powering a server fan or a small ducted fan for a LVE? (lego vacuum engine? :D) oh yeah do ya have a discord btw
Ooooh now that's a cool idea. Do you reckon a small ducted fan would be able to create a vacuum strong enough to drive an LVE? It's worth a try anyway! Cheers for the suggestion 🙏
@@JamiesBrickJams haha not fully sure but stuff like 10W or 50W server fans for sure can, small ducted fans with enough static pressure should be able to though each type would need to be tested I guess
I got mine from Amazon! I wasn't sure if it was worth investing in, but I've gotta say - it's a fantastic little compressor and has outlasted my other ones. Very well built. The brand is Autder
Yeah, agreed. There's definitely more efficiency that can be squeezed out of this thing with a better housing. I assumed the Lego bricks would work well, but the turbine kept developing speed wobbles and vibration. Real weird. Worth trying some more though
@JamiesBrickJams this is how you find small imperfections in lego pieces. I've had similar experience. Swap pieces. What piece number are you using for your curved pieces?
power, not just voltage, so you get a comparable output value, let turns on with a couple milliamperes at 1.6V. so about 1mW. in turbine rotation terms, power = torque x rpm-speed. so you did a screw press instead. lol. nice. maybe a metal compressed air tank at 10bars or more would contain more energy. pneumatic drive train. maybe diesel-electric-pneumatic powered train. efficiency tho. instead of full electric.
Quite a lot I found. Going deeper rather than shallower worked well for this small turbine shape. Though I'd imagine the angle of attack would be different for different turbine shapes
I guess technically you could pressurise a water bottle (e.g. 50 percent water and air) and have a powerful stream of water driving a turbine ... Like a vehicle powered by a water pistol!
You definitely would - piston pneumatic engines are much more powerful and more efficient! This was really just a fun experiment to see if I could even get something to move using a turbine and onboard air supply.
Yo i have idea get a mini air pump and pressure switch and put it on to fill the bottle back up while driving like a 12. Volt one with a small rc plane battery
Ah yes, I'd love to test out a Tesla turbine! It's unfortunately almost impossible to build using Lego, but I'm sure some 3d printing could make that a reality
Haha what an idea. I wonder if it's even possible to drive an air piston engine from a large tank of air with enough force to lift it. I'd imagine with a 5+ liter bottle and very light materials it might be possible
I want to like Circuit Cubes, because they're small and cheap, but they didn't work when I got them. I see people using them successfully in videos like this, so I assume they're just very hit and miss in quality. :/
Aw man sorry they didn't work for you! That's a pity. Guess I got lucky with mine. It's amazing how small they managed to make them, while still being quite powerful. Just wish they'd allow you to daisy chain the Bluetooth units so you can control more than 3 motors
its not air turbine powered the steering is controlled by a battery could u make it so that when the propellers are spinning it captures the energy and converts it into electricity through a magnetic driven electricity please its a request pls pls
So you're telling me you can make a car that runs on farts? Interesting...
I have an idea…
Gonna need a lot of beans ...
@@JamiesBrickJams and Taco Bell…
@@VengeanceYT21I'll have to find the German equivalent to taco bell as there isn't one anywhere nearby...so sauerkraut and beans with bacon?
Baconkraut?
That actually sounds delicious
I have a suggestion: Try to seal the turbine so little to no air can escape! This maximises torque or speed output significantly. Like you should place some kind of substance to seal the turbine so that no air can escape through any open gaps. And the turbine is entirely enclosed except for the pipe air intake. - Riley
What about making a hole for air exit?
@@CenReaper. What’s “qir”? - Riley
@@suezq74 I meant air but misspelled-Ivan
@@suezq74 bro speaks in quotation marks
@@spookwave4966 wrong person.
I've seen a video of a truck made from lego technic that used a piston engine powered by compressed air. It was very impressive, and I an intrigued to see how a turbine approach will go.
Ah yes, Green Gecko and others have some phenomenal designs. Piston engines I believe are much more efficient and produce much more torque. There's just something about turbines that's really satisfying though!
@@JamiesBrickJams
Saying that you remind me a lot of Integza, who also seems to be in love with turbines XD
@@Lampe2020 Absolutely love Integza's videos! Very inspiring
Can you try do truck with self powered lpe mechanism (compressor and motor together)
In order to make a balanced turbine, you need to measure both voltage and current. The higher the current, the more torque it has and the higher the voltage, the higher the speed is.
As a french personn i love the way that you say: " ET Voila " ! XD
😂
A small suggestion: Pay attention to the length/radius/diameter of your "air parts".
Torque is a measure of force over a distance (Newton on a meter stick, Pound on a 1 foot rod), so if you have large radii being pushed by air, you will be able to make use of more of the energy of the moving air. This means your compressed air will do more work. Notice the results of the "many bladed turbine" compared to the smaller diameter small bladed version. It was the diameter that was affecting your results the most. So, something with a diameter larger than you tested, but with the blade shape of what you ended up using, will get you more power to the gears.
On the wheel side, you want smaller wheels to make more use of that torque produced by the turbine. What you have is fine for higher RPM, but you can't get to that RPM with so little torque.
Yeah you're totally right, the efficiency of this one is absolutely awful - I'm sure there's a lot of potential being wasted. It's just a pity Lego doesn't design larger parts that can act as turbines. Building larger ones tends to make them quite heavy. But perhaps this is a job for 3d printing!
@@JamiesBrickJamsI have a 3d printer (That works 20% of the time)
me 17 seconds ago:" well i know what im watching next"
me 12 seconds ago: well suddenly i am bored of this 5 year old video that i have rewatched twice already over the 5 years and was rewatching again!
Yep
Hes back! I love your videos, I love how you combine fun concepts with lego and make it entertaining at the same time
I love when he uploads
I love it that each project gives ideas and usefull information for the next
Thanks a lot, appreciate it 😊 And delighted it can give folks ideas for their own projects
Dude the back tires are too big and they need way more torque to spin so try replacing them with smaller ones (the smaller they are less torque is needed)
You're totally right! I didn't include footage of it, but I tried it with smaller wheels (same as the front ones) and it went quite a bit faster from the starting position. But its top speed was a bit slower
@@JamiesBrickJams well smaller wheels also mean less speed but i think its better to keep the tiny ones
I don't know why, but the engine/Turbine concept with Legos is fascinating to me :D
Totally agree. No idea why - it's just really satisfying 😁
I love your videos, they are so creative! I also love your use of Circuit Cubes, I just got my hands on some and they are great!
Oh awesome, yeah they're great - surprisingly powerful for their size. Enjoy your builds!
What about sealing the turbine more and probably adding in some kind of gearbox to give it a better kick at the start and then ramping up?
New idea just popup in my head:
Make a car using a Lego piston ( or bigger version of it ) BUT that Lego piston engine work similar to REAL GASOLINE ENGINE ( u can replace fuel or "gasoline" with compressed air if u want )
u got urself a sub. keep it up!!!
Appreciate it! 😄
As a heads up for cheap good bottles for pressure vimto squash comes in 3L thick bottles that can handle 200PSI which is almost double that regular 2L drink bottles can handle while also being larger. I haven’t played with them under pressure but I have friends who did at uni and for a while there was always vimto squash around
03:17
But in this case, it only was about speed, wasnt it?
The only variable for how much voltage you get was the speed of the magnets relative to the coil.
Or am I missing something?
Yup, that's right. At first I was interested to simply see what speed we get using different designs. Speed has some utility. But speed doesn't necessarily mean we'll be able to drive a load, which is why the second test was needed. I knew driving a car would need the turbine to overcome some significant resistance. Especially while stationary
@@JamiesBrickJams Ah yes, makes sense. The "engine" needs some torque to get the car going. Just an idea if you do something similar in the future, try to measure the peak force you can pull with the string. Because I think once the car gets going, it needs significantly less power from the engine so it needs less air pressure.
But still, very nice video, I enjoyed it a lot! Cheers!
Yeah you're totally right, once it gets going, it can build up to some great speed as the resistance drops. Especially directly from the compressor. I feel like I've seen some torque curves for turbines somewhere - need to see how folks measure that. Good tip, thanks 🙏
Amazing video, as always😊
Appreciate it 🙏😁
awesome
Hey, this is really cool.
Two ideas: a tesla turbine might be more efficient, at the cost of yet another non-lego part.
Also you need brakes.
Tesla turbine has the same efficiency as conventional turbine when you connect it to power something and it also has a low torque at high speeds because it's spinning really fast ( TH-camr Jonny Q90 made one that spins at over 99.000 RPM 6-7 years ago).
I do love the idea of a Tesla turbine, even if just for the novelty of it! Just gotta get into some 3D printing
@@CenReaper. oh
This video is deserving of a like.
I don’t know if closer is mor efficient for the generator, plane turbines with a large bypass ratio have better efficiency
Hmmm interesting 🤔 got some learning to do here ...
In the case of a small turbine that's powered by airflow, I think my point makes sense. Unlike large aircraft engines with a bypass system for efficiency, this small turbine doesn't have that. It relies directly on the airflow to spin the blades, without internal combustion or a bypass stream. So, the bypass concept from big turbofan engines doesn’t really apply here.
Depends on what kind of jet you're talking about. Large jets have large bypass ratios to maximize efficiency over power. Fighters typically have a super low bypass ratio to maximize power over efficiency
Tip: Great big plastic bottles usually come full of horrible cheap cider! You can pour it down the drain for all it's worth, I really wouldn't recommend actually drinking any.
You really want to encase the turbine: Like the design at 4:33 should be rather decent, but without any housing it just deflects the air away.
Simplest would just be a square box of bricks with the turbine vertically in the middle, with a air-inlet at one side at top, and outlet at the other side at the top - to force the air to go through the turbine.
You're right. That was my original idea. And it sort of worked with a brick-built turbine. But for whatever reason, I just couldn't get a circular enclosure to run smoothly. It kept developing speed wobbles and vibrations, which increased the friction a lot. Certainly worth experimenting with further though
Air brakes, obviously needed for these kinds of speeds.
Haha and a parachute! No joke though, I love the idea of air brakes. And if using the same tank, the power of the brakes would remain proportional to the power to the engine
Wow scientific testing in Lego :D Now please also make the air supply out of Lego :D
I guess technically you could buy hundreds of Lego pneumatic tanks and pump them up using Lego compressors 😉
@@JamiesBrickJamswould love to see it❤
Me too... Probably would need to drop about 2 grand in parts though 😬
@@JamiesBrickJams yea thats alot to spend on lego...
as always great video
Thanks a lot 😊🙏
It’s awesome
Appreciate it 😁
NIce Video!
Cheers 😁
Good 👍
Instead of using an actuator, put motor to directly open the airflow. Far doesn't run for a long time,so it won't be a big deal.
Or, put a worm gear on a motor and a small gear on the trigger arm
It's certainly possible to do that. However I wanted fine control of the throttle, rather than just on/off. A worm gear driving an arm could certainly work. But at that point, it's really just doing the same job as a linear actuator 😁
yes new video
Hey man, awesome video! Did you ever attempt using the aerosol-can cap though?
Ooooh that would have been a much better idea! Fantastic suggestion for a v2 - thanks 🙌
@@JamiesBrickJams Yeah haha, I was the guy who recommended that last time if you remember :)
@@xmysef4920 I do now! Wish I'd remembered to do that for this project. Thanks for the reminder - it'd be a perfect way to power a smaller, lighter vehicle
@@JamiesBrickJams Oh and also, when testing different turbine rotors like you did in the video, make sure to also try slightly different gear ratios for each turbine, because some may spin slower, but produce more torque, but that torque wouldn’t be used for more power if the gear ratio doesn’t favor it. Just a recommendation!
While testing did you use compressed air, or did you faint a lot? 😂
Haha no joke - I did get pretty lightheaded blowing the turbine for a number of takes 😅
Id never heard of circuit cubes before. You should be sponsored
Haha if they reach out I'd be open to it 😁
Комментарий в поддержку канала и ролика, а также труда мастера.
Thanks a lot, appreciate it! ☺️
nice
2:25 - voltage is one thing but as you are applying an electrical load on the generator it will be harder to turn
3:18 - you are part way there, Idk anything about actual electric generator design so someone else would have to chime in
For this one, there was no load, so the generator was essentially 'free wheeling'. If nothing else, the results here are at least internally consistent. But for sure, if adding a significant load, it would create drag. I've made various air-powered generators that all experience massive drag when the load begins drawing power
You try something like a hydroelectric turbine ? Like the one u build but the air exit in the center (on the axis of rotation), and that would create a spiral, it would surely add more torque at the expense of some speed or it could be worse, I don't know, I'm not an engineer, but I am pretty sure that it will be much more efficient and if you are looking to create a vehicle that can carry its own propellant, it is essential to have an efficient engine.
Use pneumatic pistons instead. I was able to get incredible torque and speed, while keeping efficiency to its maximum!
That's awesome, did you build your own engine to power something? You're totally right, piston engines are way more efficient and powerful
Now try using a steam engine
2:29 I was NOT expecting that speed…
Found this channel by accident, loved it! Subbed.
Question: did you consider changing the shape of the output nozzle for the air to match the surface shape of the turbine blades?
lol me to
Thanks a lot! That's actually an interesting point. I haven't really experimented with that, other than just the pipe, vs the connector piece with the smaller nozzle. The nozzle concentrates it much better. But other shapes (like a flattened nozzle) could be very interesting. Thanks for the suggestion 🙏
@@JamiesBrickJams My pleasure! Keep up the awesome work, loving the vids I have seen so far 👍
Nice video!
nah fr
@@itsJelix early gang 💪
@@zachslegoworkshop yes SIR
my favorite lego creator MADE A VIDEO
DOES THIS MEAN A LEGO STEAM LOCOMOTIVE USINF AIR PRESSURE IS POSSIBLE?
where is the 'winning' turbine piece from? is it an official lego part?
Yup, it's a real piece: www.bricklink.com/v2/catalog/catalogitem.page?P=41530#T=C
Make a semi truck that has a turbine in the cab make it rwd. Then put the 2l bottle on the trailer so it can move with the turbine😊
Can’t find a bigger bottle? How big are you willing to go? What about one of those big water jugs for water dispensers?
Haha well now that you mention it ... 🤔
Please make a car with magnets to gear rotation.
Love the idea, thanks for the suggestion! Do you mean like a magnetic gearbox?
You should make something similar to an airplane turbine, and close it off.
AWESOMEEE! love your designs haha
random suggestion, lipo pack powering a server fan or a small ducted fan for a LVE? (lego vacuum engine? :D)
oh yeah do ya have a discord btw
Ooooh now that's a cool idea. Do you reckon a small ducted fan would be able to create a vacuum strong enough to drive an LVE? It's worth a try anyway! Cheers for the suggestion 🙏
@@JamiesBrickJams haha not fully sure but stuff like 10W or 50W server fans for sure can, small ducted fans with enough static pressure should be able to though each type would need to be tested I guess
Awesome, I'm already looking up some server fans 😎 Thanks again for the idea
I need to see a 3 blade design should be double the power.
Do a vacuum engine powered one
Can you give this one's moc instructions please it pretty damn good I want to build it pls
I'm afraid I don't make instructions for these models - they're just made up on the spot and then deconstructed afterwards 😅
Next make a air power lego skate board
This is random
I love it
I think it’s gold and white
Yeah well I think you should stop bullying me
@@JettySkeadyVRbro what
where can I buy the handheld air compressor that you have used in the video?
I got mine from Amazon! I wasn't sure if it was worth investing in, but I've gotta say - it's a fantastic little compressor and has outlasted my other ones. Very well built. The brand is Autder
More on the white cylinder housing!
Bent shaft
All the fan blade designs should have been tested in a housing
Yeah, agreed. There's definitely more efficiency that can be squeezed out of this thing with a better housing. I assumed the Lego bricks would work well, but the turbine kept developing speed wobbles and vibration. Real weird. Worth trying some more though
@JamiesBrickJams this is how you find small imperfections in lego pieces. I've had similar experience. Swap pieces. What piece number are you using for your curved pieces?
power, not just voltage, so you get a comparable output value, let turns on with a couple milliamperes at 1.6V. so about 1mW. in turbine rotation terms, power = torque x rpm-speed. so you did a screw press instead. lol. nice. maybe a metal compressed air tank at 10bars or more would contain more energy. pneumatic drive train. maybe diesel-electric-pneumatic powered train. efficiency tho. instead of full electric.
You definitely should try to build a small but fast vehicle
Hell yeah, that sounds like fun 😁
Imagine putting a super mini model engine in aluminium lego bars and control the throttle with a proportional motor and steered with buwizz
I always wanted to build something like this but never had the right parts
It's surprisingly easy if you have a bit of technic lying around! You can turn almost anything into a turbine if you blow it hard enough
you should try with Co2 cartridges
How much impact does angle of attack have on rotation speed?
Quite a lot I found. Going deeper rather than shallower worked well for this small turbine shape. Though I'd imagine the angle of attack would be different for different turbine shapes
6:38
Машинка работающая на сжатом воздухе - легкотня. Как насчёт сделать машину работающую на сжатой воде?
You can’t compress water noticably, sadly.
@@xmysef4920 в этом и шутка
I guess technically you could pressurise a water bottle (e.g. 50 percent water and air) and have a powerful stream of water driving a turbine ... Like a vehicle powered by a water pistol!
Would you get better efficiency out of a piston engine
You definitely would - piston pneumatic engines are much more powerful and more efficient! This was really just a fun experiment to see if I could even get something to move using a turbine and onboard air supply.
Yo i have idea get a mini air pump and pressure switch and put it on to fill the bottle back up while driving like a 12. Volt one with a small rc plane battery
That's a cool idea! I saw recently a video by Integza that used a CO2 canister to refill the air tank for a pneumatic engine. Love that concept
you should make an lego tesla turbine
I don't feel worthy of touching a lego brick any longer
How bout making the turbines, flat disks.(infinity blades) If you are skeptical search Tesla turbine over 97%. It is high speed but low torque
Ah yes, I'd love to test out a Tesla turbine! It's unfortunately almost impossible to build using Lego, but I'm sure some 3d printing could make that a reality
Id argue thats not so much a throttle as an on-off switch.
Cant we just make a decent size turbine with a high pressure air tank and power a car with zero emmisions?
Bigger, I want it to be as Big as a dumbell
add a trailer with the compressor in it
I actually love that idea
Lego x Air Hogs (remember those?)
“I haven’t heard that name in years”
What about sound engine?
At this point, it might as well be more efficient than my actual car 😂
Reminds me a lot of a Tom Stanton video...
Still more efficient than an internal combustion engine
you are getting touched for this cro 🐦
Fun Fact : In Real Life This is How Cars Work.
No… just no
Do your research And get a job
Why is it till 1 minute in i realsied that there was someone actually talking in one of theese lego vids?
AIR POWERD DRONE!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
Haha what an idea. I wonder if it's even possible to drive an air piston engine from a large tank of air with enough force to lift it. I'd imagine with a 5+ liter bottle and very light materials it might be possible
4:56 the turbine: REEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEE-
I want to like Circuit Cubes, because they're small and cheap, but they didn't work when I got them. I see people using them successfully in videos like this, so I assume they're just very hit and miss in quality. :/
Aw man sorry they didn't work for you! That's a pity. Guess I got lucky with mine. It's amazing how small they managed to make them, while still being quite powerful. Just wish they'd allow you to daisy chain the Bluetooth units so you can control more than 3 motors
Try thinner wheels my mate
its not air turbine powered the steering is controlled by a battery could u make it so that when the propellers are spinning it captures the energy and converts it into electricity through a magnetic driven electricity please its a request pls pls
that volt meter looks like a smartphone
Co2 cartridge powered Lego dragster?
this video is my ideal life dopimene go brrrrrrrrr
Csn you please make a working lego record player
I like where your mind is at - I've been experimenting with exactly this 😉
2:22 0,69 Volts - nice :D
Nice 😎
🚗
Hi
Yeet
1 minute ago the vid came out
Use a table