This has got me thinking about the Einstein quote that we are slowed down sound and light waves. Chris Lehto, a former F16 pilot has a unified theory involving condenced light coming from and then returning to source. I would highly recommend you ask him to do a podcast! Love and light! 😊
If photobiomodulation on neurons works much better when higher levels of glucose are present (in the paper by John M.), under ketosis fueling alternatively, does photobiomodulation still work as effectively? If migraine is suggested as being correlated during times of reduced glucose, would that bring less neuronal help via NIR? Would alternate fueling with ketones still allow NIR help?
It would be great to know the answer to this. It's also important to remember that there are also beneficial non-metabolic (therefore non-glucose dependant) effects resulting from PBM. Perhaps the idea of 'efficacy' is skewed by what metrics you're measuring? I think alternative fuelling is a no-brainer either way in most cases though.
I was reading up on neuromelanin (NM) a couple years ago. The rough conclusion I came to was that NM is protective against neurodegeneration, particularly by chelating metals. But when those NM-containing neurons do die, the metals are "let loose" and wreak havoc. Something like that anyway.
This is an enthralling subject - a bit 'Trekky' with the 'bold new frontiers' being obviously inner space - what was the name of John's physio friend involved in early photobiomod, Anne ...?
This was a waste of this....He did not know alot of things...He has been CENTRALIZED for too long. The interviewer knew more than him....This is what happens when you STUDIED the work of uncle Jack...
This has got me thinking about the Einstein quote that we are slowed down sound and light waves. Chris Lehto, a former F16 pilot has a unified theory involving condenced light coming from and then returning to source. I would highly recommend you ask him to do a podcast! Love and light! 😊
From where came that light?
as always excellent podcast Ricci - and hes right, you're a great communicator and knowledgeable way beyond your looks! Please keep going!
If photobiomodulation on neurons works much better when higher levels of glucose are present (in the paper by John M.), under ketosis fueling alternatively, does photobiomodulation still work as effectively? If migraine is suggested as being correlated during times of reduced glucose, would that bring less neuronal help via NIR? Would alternate fueling with ketones still allow NIR help?
It would be great to know the answer to this. It's also important to remember that there are also beneficial non-metabolic (therefore non-glucose dependant) effects resulting from PBM. Perhaps the idea of 'efficacy' is skewed by what metrics you're measuring? I think alternative fuelling is a no-brainer either way in most cases though.
Thanks for this episode Cameron. It is great to see this wide variety of guests, each from their own niches.
I was reading up on neuromelanin (NM) a couple years ago. The rough conclusion I came to was that NM is protective against neurodegeneration, particularly by chelating metals. But when those NM-containing neurons do die, the metals are "let loose" and wreak havoc. Something like that anyway.
Great Information. Thank you
Top drawer stuff
Dr. Jack Kruse is the front runner on this subject ❤ .
This is an enthralling subject - a bit 'Trekky' with the 'bold new frontiers' being obviously inner space - what was the name of John's physio friend involved in early photobiomod, Anne ...?
I believe it is Ann Leibert
Dr. Jack Kruse has been saying this for years . ❤
What happened to the biophotons???? 😜
This was a waste of this....He did not know alot of things...He has been CENTRALIZED for too long. The interviewer knew more than him....This is what happens when you STUDIED the work of uncle Jack...
John is doing phenomenal work that will move the the decentralised paradigm forward. I have a massive amount of respect for him and his colleagues.