Só ficou bizarro esse russo falando mal de Stalin. Inacreditável. A China teria demorado quantos anos mais pra se libertar se não fosse os grandes acertos e luta incansável do camarada Stalin. Bizarro não tem um marxista sério que dê mais ênfase os erros de Stalin ao invés de falar do seu legado como maior construtor do socialismo real. A China é um caso a parte, no ocidente hoje a maioria dos que se dizem marxistas não passam de bandidos anti comunista.
Chinese Marxism is not static, it is fluid and dynamics and progressive. It's gone through process and transformation from traditional ideas to contemporary. A lot of western modern thinkers have been studying this, but it's still hard for them to understand. The key is when we stand for the good of all people and benevolence, the country will be prosperous. The unique thing is, this ideology cannot be copied by any countries, because it's deeply rooted in Chinese characteristics with abundant flourishing values, culture, traditions, along its way.
Also though, after the Sino-Soviet split, the Chinese were able to feign liberalization so as to attract massive foreign investment. Like Mario jumping off Yoshi to reach the far side of an especially long gap, the USSR died so China could fly.
I think that China didn't fall like the USSR becuase Deng didn't sell the nation to the western interests, like Gorbachev. China was able to escape the Shock Therapy of Eastern Europe and could maintain its system until nowadays. The thing is, China didn't have a traitor of not only the system, but the whole country, like in USSR.
Absolutely and it always will be. Absolutely never will you have a world where the United States and the West will no longer be dominant and the rest will be cuz that will be the day. When you get the exact same thing you got a hundred years ago with Japan and Germany. The only difference is this time 12,700 wmd's.
Marx is the choice to adopt for humanity. China is a living leadership in upholding this doctrine, reinforced with her ancient Chinese virtues and wisdom. Western Democracy breeds greed.
This is the best video on this channel. I've been waiting for a more critical take from cgtn. I am not disappointed. Anti-dengism too. Really great work.
Marxism is not the way to do it. Marxism is a failed ideology that has proven nothing since the very beginning of its inception in Europe by Karl Marx.
China's rise, out of poverty and starvation, i could see, when i was still young, is admirable. Our western capitalism is so corrupt and the so-called democracy works well, for the rich. I wish the Chinese People luck and hope that no imperialist Power will disturb their way. The sure will try.
Great documentary ! It could never appear in Slovenia or Europe on national tv, since here Marx is considered minor autor in last 30 years and mentioning him publicly you are imediatelly attacked and disqulified as Stalinist or worse.
Current conjuncture in Eastern Europe on communism is very negative. But conjunctures change, will change. Everything flows, everything changes, for life is dialectical.
Thank you for this magnificent video and thank you President Xi Jinping for making this world a better place for the world to enjoy peace and prosperity for generations to come. Thank you, CHINA!!! Yes, Marx is still relevant, thank you.
Socialism with Chinese Characteristics is an underrated concept. It's the fundamental reason why China didn't fall like USSR or become capitalist/imperialist like the US. As long as Socialism with Chinese Characteristics still works Marx will remain relevant in global stage.
Leninism was essencial to achieve any marxist goals. It started with people's war and liberation of the Land. Then The rebuilding of an entire economy Destroyed by decades of war. And now some Fake marxists want to say, Marx is relevant but Stalin IS not. Come on. Revisionism in 2024, are They Crazy. They think that ALL this anti Stalin bullshit in China Will lead to more socialism? And at the same time they Will talk about "learning from ussr mistakes". what have you learned If you are still a revisionist criminal! What saved China was exactly that mao never embraced revisionism.
Thanks for the documentary comrades. Hopefully, you'll do more also on Mao, Lenin, Luxemburg et al. Greetings from Türkiye and a member from Workers' Party of Türkiye (TİP)! Long live Marxism-Leninism!
As a westener I rely and I hope, I prey as well, that China will NOT follow the confrontational path that the West, and the USA above all, have engaged toward China, as scapegoat of their own failures (failures of the West and the inequalities in the USA). I hope China will show the true values that found its reality to the rest of us in the West. A non divisive world view can be shared and China is capable of the best examples.
@@amihartz Yes its a meme from 2017, not well known as it only circulated in certain bubbles, but not a contradiction. Libertarianism originally referred to anti-capitalists who wanted to abolish the state, i.e. socialists. All Communists, including Lenin, want to abolish capitalism and the state as well. _"While the State exists, there can be no freedom. When there is freedom there will be no State"_ Lenin, State And Revolution
Marx laid the foundation for good governance. As time changes , people and things change , government change to suit current trends that maximize benefits for the people and the nation.
Marx's contributions aren't really about governance. They're more about understanding capitalism and class society in the first place. In a philosophical, economical and political basis.
Cyna was once ruled by Kuomingtan Capitalist government until that Chairman M.. who studied Marxism in Soviet convince that his improvised version of Marxism ideology was well received by the people hence the birth of new kind of governance.
such way of interpreting whether marxism is still relevant today is so false. CGTN should bring better depth in discussing this theme instead of almost propagandizing a quite important topic.
Maybe it is time for new social philosophies that match the challenges of our time. Some things have not changed while other technological advancements even marx could not take into account and today a major backlash of the industrial age is climate change and ecology There is this unfinished text of engels "dialectics of nature" which i think is very timely in this context
There is Socialist Ecology and Degrowth and many other Marx inspired forward looking ideologies addressing climate change and the environment. Marx is still relevant today because his critique of capitalism is accurate. Class war, imperialism, class struggle are still true today and people are looking to Marx for an explanation.
@@kevinjohnson9533 Degrowth is antimarxist and is more of an anarchist belief. Marxism is a science of socioeconomic development, it is basically a science of growth. So it cannot be made compatible with "degrowth." Ecosocialism is popular among Marxists these days but it takes a different form. Xi Jinping for example has repeatedly said that long-term growth requires taking care of the environment or else it would not be sustainable. Growth thus not only is compatible with environmentalism but environmentalism is necessary if you believe in growth. That's the Marxist position.
White cat, black cat, it doesn't matter as long as it catches mice ~ Deng Xiaoping Capitalism is good in creating wealth but not in distribution ,, real capitalism doesn't work A mix between the two is best Leaving space for human greed with control and giving to the less lucky beings
And I want to add , seems like we are in race to the bottom.. which country can give less taxes+ more benefit to the rich to make them Richer? No I'm not saying we should take their wealth but.. don't tell me someone who has 100+ billion $ of wealth is because his "working hard". , more like others don't get what they deserve for their time and effort
Disagree. Capitalism is not as good as a planned economy at creating wealth. But a country must do business with the world hegemon in order to have some sovereignty. The market economy will be relieved of its usefulness the moment America falls. Military speaking.
The Socialist system in China as well as Vietnam are not determined by finance capital Think of stock markets as tools just like rifles or computers. Imperialists use them to extract wealth from the people and even each other. But they make investing in needed goods easier when led by a worker's state. Eventually they'll become obsolete through tech evolution. That's what Deng visioned
I would say that one important thing for wealth creation is connection to the rest of the world. By gaining access to global trade, new technology and quicker growth can be achieved. People often highlight the "reform" of Deng, but the "opening up" is also crucial. The current path that China is on is one integrated with the global economy and pushing a new way forward, with state owned enterprises and businesses in the interest of the public increasingly leading the globe in technology and production. Although for a country in this current capitalist-dominated world, private enterprises and a market economy is useful, that doesn't mean that this is the most effective system. I think if socialism was the dominant political practice in the world, it would be countries holding onto old capitalist practices that would seem inefficient. Part of the genius of Socialism with Chinese characteristics is being pragmatic enough to survive and help peacefully create the conditions in the world for further socialist development. A system can't be judged in isolation from the global situation, as comparisons between the USSR and the USA often fell victim to.
Marx: "only the people working united can lift up a country." The people working united in China: "that sounds like a good idea, we will do it." Isaacstone: "Only the people working united lifted up China, Marx's ideas had nothing to do with it."
They are talking about marxism with chinese characteristics, like mao Said since The first days of chinese republic. Stalin was Called traitor by fake marxists for the same reason during NEP períod of economic reconstruction
Stalin defended NEP until the late 1920s as far as I'm aware. In fact, contrary to Lenin, he thought the Russian State should give up its monopoly on foreign trade. He then adopted 5 year plans and a policy geared to industrialisation, which the left opposition had been advocating for. Only, it was implemented in a ruthlessly top down, dictatorial manner. The policy of the comintern under Stalin was for the Chinese Communists to literally join/merge with the Nationalists and pursue a bourgeois revolution - which was the Menshivik line in Russia which the Bolsheviks led by Lenin, abandoned in April 1917. Stalin's policy via the Chinese communists resulted in them being literally slaughtered.
China uses the capitalist market to achieve socialism. Capitalist growth and abundance for national and community needs. State owned companies alongside private companies with banking and finance controlled by the state. China controls capitalism. In China a Billionaire can go to jail, in America the billionaires are the government.
Marx also said that you cannot eliminate the private sector by decree, that you can only eliminate it in proportion to the level of socialization of production, and the socialization of production is something that is produced by markets. Marx never advocated for just banning all private property, this is a myth and would contradict with historical materialism. Marx only called for nationalizing the heights of the economy, the biggest and most centralized enterprises, and then viewed that the rest would become nationalized over a very very long period of time, but he never put a timeline on how long he'd think this would take for the rest of the economy to become socialized. The Stalin Model is called the "Stalin Model" for a reason. Outlawing all private property immediately was never a part of Marxism originally, it was something Stalin came up with.
@@amihartz I am farmer : I never employed anybody and I have accumulated some capital during my life ... that is the truth and it is universal truth ! above all during the nineteen century at the time of marx.
I go even further and state that both are merely functions, both of which are increasingly automated. (Most 'allocations of capital' are not conscious decisions by investors like Warren Buffet, but follow simple algorithms such as index fund targets (x% in this sector, y% in that sector, z% in bonds, etc.) Labor of all types of course is being automated. How does the proletariat seize the means of production when they no longer exist? Ironically, the greatest advances have been made by China with almost fully automated mines, ports, factories, i.e., the traditional bastions of 'organized labor'. We need to advance the harmony of interests more than to expect the 'negation of the negation' and the triumph of one 'class' over another. And the majority of those interests are non-economic. Industry is the means, not destination. "We work to live; not live to work."
What would emerge if WE, the global north, OECD… took a hard and critical look at our own political economy, our practices and beliefs? How were «things» here, back when Marx (and numerous others) built on i.e. Hegel to create this practical framework of critical thought and analysis? What or who strangled European people at large back then - and again now, as our own «economy» is distorted and exploited? The answers are HERE in our own «western» societies. Look to & at ourselves, at least before blaming «the others». The so called free world indeed made its own choices, right? Right…? (Literally…) 😊
Why the fluck are viewers subjected to annoying, bland, monotonous, senseless, insipid, mindless, distracting back-ground music, in these great videos? Another great video wasted!
Do not waste your time or you may gain knowledge of what's is wrong with the system! Don't educate yourself for the love of god or you may find out that you are being exploited. Don't watch it or you may discoverer why that ideology is key to fight for a better world!
It's far more ethical than any other ideology. The first thing you need to become a communist is empathy. The philosophy, economics and politics come after understanding the method and arduous study.
He was a guy who believed that socioeconomic development should be treated as a science and not a personal opinion, and developed an idea referred to as "historical materialism" where the term "historical" refers to _historical development_ (how societies change over time) and "materialism" refers to treating this as a material science. He then wrote very lengthy textbook-length books analyzing how human societies developed historically as well as how they are developing today. Marx also argued that science isn't just for intellectual pursuit, but also to _apply_ it to inform our decisions. For example, on one hand, we have the study of chemistry/biology, but on the other, we have the _application_ of this science in the form of modern medicine. Marx hoped a scientific theory of socioeconomic development could inform political decisions.
@@luked2982science can be used. for example, chemistry is used for creating medicine, plastics, fertilizer and more, because our understanding of chemistry allows us to use it in a socially useful way. electronics and electricity allow communication, callikg emergency services when needed and such, but the technology used to do that is the application of the science of eg water boiling and how electricaly generators and electricity in general works, because electricity and electronic computing only can be invented with the understanding of how the surrounding science works. similarly, economic understanding can be used to shape the economic framework in a way that it fulfills public needs better. I do not think eugenics is useful, however gene therapy, like with CRISPR, to prevent genetic diseases and enhance human capabilities is useful, if it isn’t accessible to the rich only.
Учение великого Маркса - это ключ к пониманию текущей реальности! Изучайте эти блестящие труды!
Só ficou bizarro esse russo falando mal de Stalin. Inacreditável. A China teria demorado quantos anos mais pra se libertar se não fosse os grandes acertos e luta incansável do camarada Stalin. Bizarro não tem um marxista sério que dê mais ênfase os erros de Stalin ao invés de falar do seu legado como maior construtor do socialismo real. A China é um caso a parte, no ocidente hoje a maioria dos que se dizem marxistas não passam de bandidos anti comunista.
Exactly, just bought Karl Marx’s “Capital” volumes 1-3 as I believe he lays out perfectly what’s happening in our world right now.
Chinese Marxism is not static, it is fluid and dynamics and progressive. It's gone through process and transformation from traditional ideas to contemporary. A lot of western modern thinkers have been studying this, but it's still hard for them to understand. The key is when we stand for the good of all people and benevolence, the country will be prosperous. The unique thing is, this ideology cannot be copied by any countries, because it's deeply rooted in Chinese characteristics with abundant flourishing values, culture, traditions, along its way.
The Marxist method is fluid in its inception.
It's never dogmatic. And chairman Mao understood this.
China was able to survive longer because it had learned a lot from the experience of the dissolution of the USSR and Soviet mistakes.
China only lasted because it was granted access to the capitalist west.
Also though, after the Sino-Soviet split, the Chinese were able to feign liberalization so as to attract massive foreign investment. Like Mario jumping off Yoshi to reach the far side of an especially long gap, the USSR died so China could fly.
You mean revisionist mistakes. Mao were always close to Stalin soviet union. Those were The days of internationalist brotherhood
I think that China didn't fall like the USSR becuase Deng didn't sell the nation to the western interests, like Gorbachev. China was able to escape the Shock Therapy of Eastern Europe and could maintain its system until nowadays. The thing is, China didn't have a traitor of not only the system, but the whole country, like in USSR.
Marx's works are rooted on the science of dialectical materialism.
Dialectical Materialism is much more like a "meta-scientific" method but sure.
@nickolasrobert7340 your comment is meaningless jibberish.
Dialectical materialism isn't science
Marx and Lenin are looking at us smiling from heaven
long live Marx and Socialism
long live the proletariat
Is western Democratic still relevant today?
As an African we are tired of West Sanctimony
Oh please! All of Africa is self ruled. You only have yourselves to blame.
Is capitalism or western democracy still relevant today? These are the issues that really matter now.
China is capitalist
Absolutely and it always will be. Absolutely never will you have a world where the United States and the West will no longer be dominant and the rest will be cuz that will be the day. When you get the exact same thing you got a hundred years ago with Japan and Germany. The only difference is this time 12,700 wmd's.
they are all irrelevant. now we have a technocracy .
They are relevant to the extent that the collective West will do all it can to stop global justice, including climate justice.
Apparently yes, since the west and a major portion of the east is capitalist.
Marx is the choice to adopt for humanity. China is a living leadership in upholding this doctrine, reinforced with her ancient Chinese virtues and wisdom. Western Democracy breeds greed.
I think Obrador did the same for México. Look The Maya Train is amazing
This is the best video on this channel. I've been waiting for a more critical take from cgtn. I am not disappointed. Anti-dengism too. Really great work.
These documentaries are getting better! I think the music is a bit loud compared to their voices but still good!
No It sounds Very good here
I teared up at the end. Marxism is the way forward.
workers of the world unite
So did I! ❤
Marx said, "A civilization can only progress if the video is uploaded in 1080p". CTGN comrades, can you upload in HD?
I expected a deeper dive into chinese economic policy and marxism, the documentary left me only with unanswered questions
yes, understanding capitalism is essential for everyone with a brain
Marxism is not the way to do it. Marxism is a failed ideology that has proven nothing since the very beginning of its inception in Europe by Karl Marx.
China's rise, out of poverty and starvation, i could see, when i was still young, is admirable. Our western capitalism is so corrupt and the so-called democracy works well, for the rich. I wish the Chinese People luck and hope that no imperialist Power will disturb their way. The sure will try.
It was Western capitalism that brought China out of poverty and starvation... it was Mao's Marxism that created that poverty and untold death.
Well said indeed.
At least you can criticise the government
This is a wonderfully produced documentary. Thank you. It's very informative.
The answer is it is!
Marx was actually an admirer of Adam Smith. Most neoclassical economists who quote "the invisible hand" haven't read _The Wealth of Nations._
Great documentary ! It could never appear in Slovenia or Europe on national tv, since here Marx is considered minor autor in last 30 years and mentioning him publicly you are imediatelly attacked and disqulified as Stalinist or worse.
Current conjuncture in Eastern Europe on communism is very negative. But conjunctures change, will change. Everything flows, everything changes, for life is dialectical.
Thank you for this magnificent video and thank you President Xi Jinping for making this world a better place for the world to enjoy peace and prosperity for generations to come. Thank you, CHINA!!! Yes, Marx is still relevant, thank you.
While China bullies its neighbors out of their territory and resources... yup... enjoy the peace!
Socialism with Chinese Characteristics is an underrated concept. It's the fundamental reason why China didn't fall like USSR or become capitalist/imperialist like the US.
As long as Socialism with Chinese Characteristics still works Marx will remain relevant in global stage.
Leninism was essencial to achieve any marxist goals. It started with people's war and liberation of the Land. Then The rebuilding of an entire economy Destroyed by decades of war. And now some Fake marxists want to say, Marx is relevant but Stalin IS not. Come on. Revisionism in 2024, are They Crazy. They think that ALL this anti Stalin bullshit in China Will lead to more socialism? And at the same time they Will talk about "learning from ussr mistakes". what have you learned If you are still a revisionist criminal! What saved China was exactly that mao never embraced revisionism.
Sweat shop with Chinese smoke 😂😂🤣🤣
Fantastic documentary! Thank you, CCTN ❤
Love and support from Norway
Thanks for the documentary comrades. Hopefully, you'll do more also on Mao, Lenin, Luxemburg et al. Greetings from Türkiye and a member from Workers' Party of Türkiye (TİP)! Long live Marxism-Leninism!
As a westener I rely and I hope, I prey as well, that China will NOT follow the confrontational path that the West, and the USA above all, have engaged toward China, as scapegoat of their own failures (failures of the West and the inequalities in the USA). I hope China will show the true values that found its reality to the rest of us in the West. A non divisive world view can be shared and China is capable of the best examples.
Marx is more relevant than ever before
people overhate marx, people need to read Engels and Lenin 🚩👍🏼
Informative and prescient video
Get some Party for Socialism and Liberation people on here
this is a well made commercial for China's system
is your username a meme? wtf is a "libertarian leninist"?
@@amihartz Yes its a meme from 2017, not well known as it only circulated in certain bubbles, but not a contradiction.
Libertarianism originally referred to anti-capitalists who wanted to abolish the state, i.e. socialists.
All Communists, including Lenin, want to abolish capitalism and the state as well.
_"While the State exists, there can be no freedom. When there is freedom there will be no State"_ Lenin, State And Revolution
@@LibertarianLeninistRants I hope you read more than a quote.
@@viniciustoresan4780 ofc, I'm a book worm
Hoped I could listen to this as a podcast. But there are so many beautiful images of chinese every day´s life - I'll watch this later. 🙂
LONG LIVE MARXISM-LENINISM!
Its necessary
Marx laid the foundation for good governance. As time changes , people and things change , government change to suit current trends that maximize benefits for the people and the nation.
Marx's contributions aren't really about governance.
They're more about understanding capitalism and class society in the first place. In a philosophical, economical and political basis.
Who is the founding father of middle kingdom and what was his ideology based on
Why did Soviet change from Communist to Capitalist government
Cyna was once ruled by Kuomingtan Capitalist government until that Chairman M.. who studied Marxism in Soviet convince that his improvised version of Marxism ideology was well received by the people hence the birth of new kind of governance.
@@BrandyHeng007just blame the West for pressuring the Soviet government. The early days of Russia under Yeltsin were horrible.
Great doc!
scientific thought is always relevant.
such way of interpreting whether marxism is still relevant today is so false. CGTN should bring better depth in discussing this theme instead of almost propagandizing a quite important topic.
Marx is everywhere all the time.
Maybe it is time for new social philosophies that match the challenges of our time.
Some things have not changed while other technological advancements even marx could not take into account and today a major backlash of the industrial age is climate change and ecology
There is this unfinished text of engels "dialectics of nature" which i think is very timely in this context
There is Socialist Ecology and Degrowth and many other Marx inspired forward looking ideologies addressing climate change and the environment. Marx is still relevant today because his critique of capitalism is accurate. Class war, imperialism, class struggle are still true today and people are looking to Marx for an explanation.
@@kevinjohnson9533 Degrowth is antimarxist and is more of an anarchist belief. Marxism is a science of socioeconomic development, it is basically a science of growth. So it cannot be made compatible with "degrowth." Ecosocialism is popular among Marxists these days but it takes a different form. Xi Jinping for example has repeatedly said that long-term growth requires taking care of the environment or else it would not be sustainable. Growth thus not only is compatible with environmentalism but environmentalism is necessary if you believe in growth. That's the Marxist position.
More than ever!
White cat, black cat, it doesn't matter as long as it catches mice ~ Deng Xiaoping
Capitalism is good in creating wealth but not in distribution ,, real capitalism doesn't work
A mix between the two is best
Leaving space for human greed with control and giving to the less lucky beings
And I want to add , seems like we are in race to the bottom.. which country can give less taxes+ more benefit to the rich to make them Richer? No I'm not saying we should take their wealth but.. don't tell me someone who has 100+ billion $ of wealth is because his "working hard". , more like others don't get what they deserve for their time and effort
if it wasn't for capitalism , corporations wouldn't outsource to china creating jobs
Disagree. Capitalism is not as good as a planned economy at creating wealth.
But a country must do business with the world hegemon in order to have some sovereignty.
The market economy will be relieved of its usefulness the moment America falls. Military speaking.
The Socialist system in China as well as Vietnam are not determined by finance capital
Think of stock markets as tools just like rifles or computers. Imperialists use them to extract wealth from the people and even each other. But they make investing in needed goods easier when led by a worker's state. Eventually they'll become obsolete through tech evolution.
That's what Deng visioned
I would say that one important thing for wealth creation is connection to the rest of the world. By gaining access to global trade, new technology and quicker growth can be achieved. People often highlight the "reform" of Deng, but the "opening up" is also crucial. The current path that China is on is one integrated with the global economy and pushing a new way forward, with state owned enterprises and businesses in the interest of the public increasingly leading the globe in technology and production. Although for a country in this current capitalist-dominated world, private enterprises and a market economy is useful, that doesn't mean that this is the most effective system. I think if socialism was the dominant political practice in the world, it would be countries holding onto old capitalist practices that would seem inefficient. Part of the genius of Socialism with Chinese characteristics is being pragmatic enough to survive and help peacefully create the conditions in the world for further socialist development. A system can't be judged in isolation from the global situation, as comparisons between the USSR and the USA often fell victim to.
16:48 future of humanity
720p at least please.
24:57 where is the video clip of that conference I want to see it
I believe it's people work united in China, not marx.
Myanmar as marx and didn't change anything like Laos, Vietnam, Cambodia and Cuba.
Marx: "only the people working united can lift up a country."
The people working united in China: "that sounds like a good idea, we will do it."
Isaacstone: "Only the people working united lifted up China, Marx's ideas had nothing to do with it."
amazing things are happening in china
Marxism said that to achieve Communism have to eliminate private sectors.
They are talking about marxism with chinese characteristics, like mao Said since The first days of chinese republic. Stalin was Called traitor by fake marxists for the same reason during NEP períod of economic reconstruction
If you talk about a dichotomy between state and private sectors than no, Marx did not say that.
Stalin defended NEP until the late 1920s as far as I'm aware. In fact, contrary to Lenin, he thought the Russian State should give up its monopoly on foreign trade.
He then adopted 5 year plans and a policy geared to industrialisation, which the left opposition had been advocating for.
Only, it was implemented in a ruthlessly top down, dictatorial manner.
The policy of the comintern under Stalin was for the Chinese Communists to literally join/merge with the Nationalists and pursue a bourgeois revolution - which was the Menshivik line in Russia which the Bolsheviks led by Lenin, abandoned in April 1917.
Stalin's policy via the Chinese communists resulted in them being literally slaughtered.
China uses the capitalist market to achieve socialism. Capitalist growth and abundance for national and community needs. State owned companies alongside private companies with banking and finance controlled by the state. China controls capitalism. In China a Billionaire can go to jail, in America the billionaires are the government.
Marx also said that you cannot eliminate the private sector by decree, that you can only eliminate it in proportion to the level of socialization of production, and the socialization of production is something that is produced by markets. Marx never advocated for just banning all private property, this is a myth and would contradict with historical materialism. Marx only called for nationalizing the heights of the economy, the biggest and most centralized enterprises, and then viewed that the rest would become nationalized over a very very long period of time, but he never put a timeline on how long he'd think this would take for the rest of the economy to become socialized. The Stalin Model is called the "Stalin Model" for a reason. Outlawing all private property immediately was never a part of Marxism originally, it was something Stalin came up with.
first ❤
Why only 480p?
no !
" there is no contradiction between capital and labor ... " henry george
Google: Marx-Engels correspondence - 20th June 1881.
Tell that to all the laborers lol
Somebody's never had a job lol
@@amihartz I am farmer : I never employed anybody and I have accumulated some capital during my life ... that is the truth and it is universal truth ! above all during the nineteen century at the time of marx.
I go even further and state that both are merely functions, both of which are increasingly automated. (Most 'allocations of capital' are not conscious decisions by investors like Warren Buffet, but follow simple algorithms such as index fund targets (x% in this sector, y% in that sector, z% in bonds, etc.)
Labor of all types of course is being automated. How does the proletariat seize the means of production when they no longer exist? Ironically, the greatest advances have been made by China with almost fully automated mines, ports, factories, i.e., the traditional bastions of 'organized labor'.
We need to advance the harmony of interests more than to expect the 'negation of the negation' and the triumph of one 'class' over another. And the majority of those interests are non-economic. Industry is the means, not destination. "We work to live; not live to work."
❤
What would emerge if WE, the global north, OECD… took a hard and critical look at our own political economy, our practices and beliefs?
How were «things» here, back when Marx (and numerous others) built on i.e. Hegel to create this practical framework of critical thought and analysis?
What or who strangled European people at large back then - and again now, as our own «economy» is distorted and exploited?
The answers are HERE in our own «western» societies. Look to & at ourselves, at least before blaming «the others». The so called free world indeed made its own choices, right?
Right…? (Literally…) 😊
❤❤❤❤
Subtitulos en espanhol?
Clearly these people have a very poor understanding about the ideas of Karl Marx
Yeah I'm sure the Director of the Marxist Research Institute has a poor understanding of Marx...
实事求是，一切从实际出发！具体问题具体分析！对立统一规律，量变质变规律，否定之否定规律！这些馬克思主義的基本原理和方法，中国共产党也是付出了巨大的牺牲才逐步认识到的！这里面，毛泽东居功至伟！！！毫不夸张的说，没有毛泽东就没有中国共产党，中华人民共和国，中国人民解放军！
❤🎉
That's one way to alienate support
Why the fluck are viewers subjected to annoying, bland, monotonous, senseless, insipid, mindless, distracting back-ground music, in these great videos? Another great video wasted!
💝💝💝💝💝👍👍👍👍👍👍💪💪💪💪💪💪💪
its fun how we can clearly tell who is a real leftist and who doesnt know shit about what they are speaking about 🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣
25 min of pure BS. Not even one line from Das Kapital was pronounced LOL.
Apologist for revisionism
Why are we making a video on Marx in 2024 and still asking the question of his relevance ??
"To get rich is glorious." - Deng Xiaoping
Marxism sure 😂😂😂
Marxist not right unless chinese open their economic.....😂
Nota dez pra ele, inteligentao demais 🧠
@@maloquerianordesteNota dez para o seu português.
@@andred7684 liberalzinho pooto
And above all no wisdom.
How much are you educated in Marxism-Leninism, to gift us such a bold statement?
Do not waste your time, his ideology was totally wrong and brought many people in the disastrous life - it has no ethics.
Do not waste your time or you may gain knowledge of what's is wrong with the system! Don't educate yourself for the love of god or you may find out that you are being exploited. Don't watch it or you may discoverer why that ideology is key to fight for a better world!
And this you know without having read a single word of it.
Walking with shut eyes and ears
It's far more ethical than any other ideology.
The first thing you need to become a communist is empathy.
The philosophy, economics and politics come after understanding the method and arduous study.
Dope not knowing what is all about. Pity. 🙈
Very Nice Video😊
To young to know who this man is.
He was a guy who believed that socioeconomic development should be treated as a science and not a personal opinion, and developed an idea referred to as "historical materialism" where the term "historical" refers to _historical development_ (how societies change over time) and "materialism" refers to treating this as a material science. He then wrote very lengthy textbook-length books analyzing how human societies developed historically as well as how they are developing today. Marx also argued that science isn't just for intellectual pursuit, but also to _apply_ it to inform our decisions. For example, on one hand, we have the study of chemistry/biology, but on the other, we have the _application_ of this science in the form of modern medicine. Marx hoped a scientific theory of socioeconomic development could inform political decisions.
@@luked2982science can be used. for example, chemistry is used for creating medicine, plastics, fertilizer and more, because our understanding of chemistry allows us to use it in a socially useful way. electronics and electricity allow communication, callikg emergency services when needed and such, but the technology used to do that is the application of the science of eg water boiling and how electricaly generators and electricity in general works, because electricity and electronic computing only can be invented with the understanding of how the surrounding science works. similarly, economic understanding can be used to shape the economic framework in a way that it fulfills public needs better. I do not think eugenics is useful, however gene therapy, like with CRISPR, to prevent genetic diseases and enhance human capabilities is useful, if it isn’t accessible to the rich only.