Interview with John Milbank

แชร์
ฝัง
  • เผยแพร่เมื่อ 21 ต.ค. 2024

ความคิดเห็น • 19

  • @thomassimmons1950
    @thomassimmons1950 5 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

    I also had, as a child, this intuition of what came to be called universalism. It came to me in a flash as I sat in religion class, I still remember that moment.

  • @ALLHEART_
    @ALLHEART_ 5 หลายเดือนก่อน +3

    Congrats! Good interview.

  • @janmalaszek1459
    @janmalaszek1459 21 วันที่ผ่านมา

    Nice analysis of populism. It's tense here in the UK because the veil has been lifted from many peoples eyes.

  • @chriswatson9668
    @chriswatson9668 5 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    Hi Hunter, My apologies for not responding sooner, as I have been ill. I wanted to say thank you for the book recommendation on capitalism. I hope you had a blessed Pascha! God bless you and your loved ones, too.

  • @chriswatson9668
    @chriswatson9668 5 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Hi Hunter. Thank you for the channel and the work you do. Great interview. Can you tell me what thinker Millbank refers to at 12:40? Allan Kaiye? Also, can you recommend any other books dealing with capitalism and modernity? God bless you!
    PS: I greatly anticipate purchasing and reading your book on universalism. You played a pivotal, "saving" role in convincing me of apocatastasis.

    • @dissatisfiedphilosophy
      @dissatisfiedphilosophy  5 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      May God bless you and all your loved ones!
      I recommend reading “Enchantments of Mammon” (2019) by Eugene McCarraher. DBH interviewed him on his channel so you could check that out beforehand as well.
      I unfortunately am unfamiliar with who John is speaking about in the time stamp you mentioned.

    • @doodoo4981
      @doodoo4981 5 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

      He’s talking about Alain Caille.

    • @chriswatson9668
      @chriswatson9668 5 หลายเดือนก่อน

      ​@@doodoo4981thank you.

    • @chriswatson9668
      @chriswatson9668 5 หลายเดือนก่อน

      ​@@doodoo4981thank you

  • @kaidoloveboat1591
    @kaidoloveboat1591 6 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    What is the name at 52:21?

  • @mattboulter1
    @mattboulter1 4 หลายเดือนก่อน

    For a "ressourcement" theologian who imbibes Schelling (via the Tübibgen School), there is Ratzinger. Tracey Rowland is good on this, and I talk abt it in my dissertation/book.

    • @Joeonline26
      @Joeonline26 3 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      This kid doesn't know who any of those people are

  • @judygaleinchapelhill
    @judygaleinchapelhill 4 หลายเดือนก่อน

  • @Oskar-ey6jb
    @Oskar-ey6jb หลายเดือนก่อน

    39:02 - "too Protestant". Surely you mean too Catholic. Protestantism is inherently more open to esotericism, since you have done away with the mediating function of dogmatic authority.

  • @Joeonline26
    @Joeonline26 5 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

    Largely Milbank talking to himself for an hour. The kid was clearly out of his depth.

    • @liallhristendorff5218
      @liallhristendorff5218 2 หลายเดือนก่อน +3

      Nah he was switched on. You’re unnecessarily rude

    • @Joeonline26
      @Joeonline26 2 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      @@liallhristendorff5218 I don't think you were paying attention. Nothing to do with being rude. Just an obvious truth about this 'interview'.

    • @Oskar-ey6jb
      @Oskar-ey6jb หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      It's just Milbank, he's a big talker. You wind him up and watch him go. It has both its good and bad side of course.