GE’s Molten Salt Battery Failure

แชร์
ฝัง
  • เผยแพร่เมื่อ 25 พ.ค. 2022
  • Hat tip to an anonymous subscriber for this topic suggestion.
    In 2011, then-President Barack Obama visited a General Electric or GE facility in the town of Schenectady, New York. There, he mostly discussed wind turbine exports. But he also briefly mentioned an "advanced battery" business with great promise.
    Obama was referring to a molten salt stationary battery technology branded as Durathon. GE CEO Jeff Immelt believed that it will become a billion dollar business.
    But Durathon fell far short. In 2015, the company closed its battery manufacturing factory in New York after investing nearly $200 million. Nearly a hundred people lost their jobs.
    In this video, we are going to look at General Electric's failed molten salt battery business venture.
    Links:
    - The Asianometry Newsletter: asianometry.com
    - Patreon: / asianometry
    - The Podcast: anchor.fm/asianometry
    - Twitter: / asianometry

ความคิดเห็น • 536

  • @Asianometry
    @Asianometry  2 ปีที่แล้ว +69

    What other battery topic videos do you want to see on the channel?

    • @PBnFlash
      @PBnFlash 2 ปีที่แล้ว +4

      I would like to learn about solid electrolytes

    • @Keavon
      @Keavon 2 ปีที่แล้ว +6

      The highest power density batteries in use today for niche/expensive applications and why they aren't affordable yet at wide scale but what it will take to become more widely adopted.

    • @ImgCarrot
      @ImgCarrot 2 ปีที่แล้ว +4

      Just wondering... Korea side somewhat government initiated hydrogen power industries were booming few times, and where they are now... previously US company called Nicola, which scammed hydrogen fuel cell driven car manufacturing was big issue, and many of big companies did invest and collaborate announcement made previously. What other Asian companies involved and affected then, and what they are doing now...

    • @herbertpocket8855
      @herbertpocket8855 2 ปีที่แล้ว +2

      I want to see liquid aluminum batteries, I heard about those taking advantage of the metal’s insane latent heat of fusion

    • @thewatersavior
      @thewatersavior 2 ปีที่แล้ว +3

      Not exactly batteries but dump mining and pyrolysis related tech

  • @TheCptnOfFail
    @TheCptnOfFail 2 ปีที่แล้ว +183

    "Would you want a molten salt walkman?"
    Actually, yes. If only for the sake of owning a molten salt walkman.

    • @nathanieljames7462
      @nathanieljames7462 2 ปีที่แล้ว +2

      Take mu moneh!

    • @mukamuka0
      @mukamuka0 2 ปีที่แล้ว +3

      The only music Molten salt walkman can play is the boss music~ 😂

    • @JohnDoe-ks9xx
      @JohnDoe-ks9xx ปีที่แล้ว +6

      Fun fact. That Walkman would come with the Doom Eternal soundtrack pre-installed 😂😂

  • @TubersAndPotatoes
    @TubersAndPotatoes 2 ปีที่แล้ว +338

    Interesting, so it wasn't the molten salt technology itself that failed but it failed because of GE's poor business planning. They didn't build up the market and demand before massively scaling up.

    • @mishmohd
      @mishmohd 2 ปีที่แล้ว +13

      Energy intensity is a big factor

    • @shadmansudipto7287
      @shadmansudipto7287 2 ปีที่แล้ว +52

      @@mishmohd you mean density? Lol. Anyway even without the density, it would be valuable today because of the durability. But they kept trying to use it in places where it didn't work. Like the train where there's space and weight limitations.

    • @benjiunofficial
      @benjiunofficial 2 ปีที่แล้ว +17

      @@shadmansudipto7287 Nickel-Iron batteries are already used in those niche situations where very long term durability and safety is required.

    • @remliqa
      @remliqa 2 ปีที่แล้ว +12

      @@benjiunofficial
      I think I just cut and paste my pervious post:
      The potential advantage is it should be dirt cheap to manufacture when it reach mass market as the material cost is relatively cheap, at least when compared to Li ion battery. . Of course it do have lower efficiency compared to Li battery but if I was was not mistaken it still have higher efficiency than pump hydro. Another company (Ambri) right now is developing this tech .

    • @harrickvharrick3957
      @harrickvharrick3957 2 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      @@remliqa Why not Edison battery? Also cheap, proven, indestructible, not the highest of efficiencies but even in the days of its inventor good enough to drive an electric car (the simple type they had developed) giving it a reach of several dozens of miles. For static applications it mostly does not matter much whether it takes up some more space or not and when the materials are cheap one can compensate for lower power density by simply adding (mounting, installing) more of it.

  • @maxheadrom3088
    @maxheadrom3088 2 ปีที่แล้ว +31

    Alumina is Aluminum Oxide - Al203. It's the term used in the industry.
    Diesel locomotives are actually electric - the diesel engine powers a generator that in turn powers the electric motor. This is necessary to overcome problems that come with the high torque needed to start moving the train. To have it really be a hybrid, all it needs is batteries. Since weight is not a problem, I would use the easiest to recycle and easier to produce.

  • @westrim
    @westrim 2 ปีที่แล้ว +132

    Pretty sure the "4,000 sold" quote refers to the Evolution Series locomotive model line as a whole (so he's making a point that it's a proven design with which they could experiment on a new propulsion system), not the hybrids they wanted to make within that model line, and the article's editing garbled that.

    • @hoofie2002
      @hoofie2002 2 ปีที่แล้ว +2

      Pretty clear I would have thought that it refers to the loco model line - dissapointed he is making such an issue out of it.

    • @thedave7760
      @thedave7760 2 ปีที่แล้ว +4

      If you want to try battery hybrids on railroads why would you build it into the Loco?
      It would surely be best to just put it in a wagon near to the power end so you can experiment with it and if it fails you can still have your Loco.
      It makes sense, pretty much all Locos have regenerative brakes anyway why not have a battery car to store this.

    • @thedave7760
      @thedave7760 2 ปีที่แล้ว +5

      @@ajseusa1488 The generator powers the wheels only when needed I suppose you might call that hybrid but not in the modern sense of the word. They pretty much all have regenerative braking but the massive amounts of electricity produced is put through huge resistors and dissipated as heat, I don't think many if any have a means to store the excess electricity. It should be a simple thing to have another car at the front of the train with a huge battery pack after all trains don't care much about weight.

  • @octogames6823
    @octogames6823 2 ปีที่แล้ว +45

    I worked for GE Energy Storage. I spent many hours in that building. I worked for the metrology so I measured everything that came through the door including powders and liquids.

  • @htomerif
    @htomerif 2 ปีที่แล้ว +35

    A lot of our missile systems in the Army used molten salt batteries. I always just heard them called "thermal batteries" and they got very very hot. I don't think they were long-term reliable though. All of the systems I know of that used them had pretty substantial dud rates.

    • @davidanalyst671
      @davidanalyst671 2 ปีที่แล้ว +2

      WUT???? Ive never heard of that. are you talking about "portable" missile systems? Thats pretty cool tho

    • @htomerif
      @htomerif 2 ปีที่แล้ว +23

      @@davidanalyst671 Well both. I think thermal batteries are used on almost everything that has a flight time of only a few seconds where you need a huge amount of power to run pneumatic solenoids or directly actuate flight surfaces or light steering rockets.
      When the optics system for non-fire-and-forget missiles gets its power from the missile tube (i.e. the power is disposable) then there's a thermal battery in both the missile and left behind on the tube. When its something that's non-disposable but usually found in vehicles, then its usually either NiCd or disposable lithium batteries.
      I remember one where we had a dud, it had enough power to go "pop" and spin up the optics and the missile gyro, so it was really obvious it was going, but the missile never launched. The guy had to sit there for like half an hour with a shaped charge 6 inches from his head before EOD came and took it away (i.e. 50 yards away) and blew the dud up with basically all the C4 they were carrying.
      Usually when they're duds though they just go crazy and the steering locks in one direction. I've seen them do like 180 degrees before they crash. I've seen them flip over in the air and detonate their shaped charge back at the user (i.e. fukkin *ME*) and I've seen them pile drive into the ground as soon as they physically can in front of the user. Fortunately, they all have distance safety interlocks on the detonator and I haven't seen that fail yet.
      Its interesting to see a shaped charge fire in mid-air. You just get a big green spike of smoke that suddenly appears in whatever direction the missile was pointing. (they all have copper cores and I'm assuming the green color is from copper oxide formation from the molten copper jet)
      Anyway, nothing here thats classified, so I'll hit "reply".

    • @0MoTheG
      @0MoTheG ปีที่แล้ว +1

      Those are extremely reliable but not rechargeable.

    • @htomerif
      @htomerif ปีที่แล้ว +6

      @@0MoTheG Well... no part of a missile tends to be recyclable, regardless of whether its the part that flies or the tube that it was in. And we're talking about missiles that started at $10,000 a pop and on the higher end were more than $200,000.
      I've seen the decommissioning pits where a lot of obsolete but still classified electronics go. Its literally just an endless pit of probably billions of dollars of electronics and they just have some guy with a tracked vehicle like an m88 wrecker driving back and forth for hours to crunch it all up. Seems stupid but a lot of stuff is.

    • @jaik195701
      @jaik195701 ปีที่แล้ว +3

      Thermal batteries are ones which are not active until heated to a high temperature. In munitions, thermal batteries contain a Pyrotechnic device which rapidly hits the thermal battery in milliseconds and causes the battery to become active. Then the thermal battery can deliver high power for several seconds to upwards of maybe an hour depending on the application.

  • @mrgreatauk
    @mrgreatauk 2 ปีที่แล้ว +30

    A shame it didn't work out... Can't help thinking there's still a huge amount of potential in this sort of technology if someone gets the implementation right though.

    • @internetguy1260
      @internetguy1260 2 ปีที่แล้ว +8

      It seems like it would be useful in combination with home solar and air conditioning. You could use solar to charge it during the day, and the waste heat from home A/C to heat it!

  • @madderanger7838
    @madderanger7838 2 ปีที่แล้ว +39

    GE certainly made at least 4000 diesel-electric locomotives. This is what the CEO of GE was saying. Not that they built 4000 battery equipped locos.

    • @narmale
      @narmale 2 ปีที่แล้ว +2

      which was nothing but shite, because all of the modern diesels are diesel-electric... xD

    • @davidhollenshead4892
      @davidhollenshead4892 2 ปีที่แล้ว

      Any diesel electic locomotive that stores energy in a battery or capacitor can be called a "hybrid"...

    • @narmale
      @narmale 2 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      @@davidhollenshead4892 technically they can call it a hybrid exactly as it is, cuz it is

    • @davidanalyst671
      @davidanalyst671 2 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      immelt was a bs-er and destroyed his own company on purpose

    • @girlintraining
      @girlintraining 2 ปีที่แล้ว

      It's fascinating how no matter what the misrepresentation of the truth is there's always a guy willing to defend it because it maintains the status quo.

  • @lvl10cooking
    @lvl10cooking 2 ปีที่แล้ว +4

    “Would you want a molten salt Walkman?”
    Fuck yeah!

  • @MoraFermi
    @MoraFermi 2 ปีที่แล้ว +20

    The sad part is, molten salt batteries would make perfect sense as grid scale storage for renewables. If they focused on that, they would have likely succeeded to grow a "six billion" market.. probably in ten years or so.

    • @gorak9000
      @gorak9000 2 ปีที่แล้ว +4

      And how do they compare with something much simpler, say pumped hydro, where when you have extra energy, you pump water up hill, and then later when you need it, you extract the energy back out from the water flowing back down? That seems to be a lot cheaper and a lot simpler - it's ready to go today (and is in place today already) and doesn't need anything fancy - no 250*C sodium, basically unlimited lifetime, etc etc. Why are people always looking for a complicated / expensive solution to problems that already have simple / cheap solutions

    • @oadka
      @oadka 2 ปีที่แล้ว +13

      @@gorak9000 A lot cheaper???? Pumped hydro needs a lot more land to store the same amount of energy as batteries. Even lead acid batteries will take lesser space than pumped hydro. and 250 deg is not that much tbh. Industrial furnaces are capable of much more than that. With good insulation, there won't be much issues....

    • @reinerheiner1148
      @reinerheiner1148 2 ปีที่แล้ว +16

      Pumped hydro is massively limited by available locations.

    • @megalonoobiacinc4863
      @megalonoobiacinc4863 2 ปีที่แล้ว +2

      @@reinerheiner1148 its also the least energy dense battery of all the solutions, yet it has a charm being more down to earth than any other tech

    • @clarkkent7973
      @clarkkent7973 2 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      And would have paired perfectly with their windmill generator business.

  • @Alexander_Sannikov
    @Alexander_Sannikov 2 ปีที่แล้ว +4

    > would you want a molten salt walkman?
    are you kidding? of course! having a device with temperature gradient of hundreds C over a couple millimeters and energy density comparable to modern Li-Ion? absolutely! 30 years ago, omg!

  • @zachroth2161
    @zachroth2161 2 ปีที่แล้ว +15

    As a Locomotive engineer I operate the GE Evolution Series motors on a daily basis, it's one of the two Main Primary Movers we operate. Between Catapillar's Progress Rail EMD formerly owned by General Motors with the SD70 and GE's ES44C4/AC. Or Evolution Series 4400hp AC. Or the newer ET44C4/AC motors which are Tier 4 California Emission Compliant.
    They are Hybrid, but I can't find any information on if after testing they went with the Na-NiCl2 battery or something different..

    • @ADMIN-ln4dy
      @ADMIN-ln4dy 2 ปีที่แล้ว

      T̼h̼a̼n̼k̼s̼~̼~̼f̼o̼r̼ ̼w̼a̼t̼c̼h̼i̼n̼g̼!̼!̼!̼
      ̼T̼e̼x̼t̼ ̼o̼n̼ ̼W̼h̼a̼t̼s̼A̼p̼p̼✞̼︎̼✙̼①④④③⑤③⓪⑦⑨⑦⑨🚀🚀🚀📉 ▶️.

  • @Fluffywings84
    @Fluffywings84 2 ปีที่แล้ว +6

    Without being too specific, we have a battery vendor who provides molten salt batteries. They are designed for long discharge >10 hours and slow charge, perfect for daily charge and discharge. However the market is mostly high discharge as grid support such as Global Adjustment where the energy demand is so high the price of electricity skyrockets and the discharge needed is < 2 hours typically. As a result the market for long discharge and charging is niche making it application specific.

    • @GewelReal
      @GewelReal ปีที่แล้ว

      Can't you just set a single unit to discharge over such period while others are charging?
      For very short bursts then you could implement some different technology

    • @Fluffywings84
      @Fluffywings84 ปีที่แล้ว

      @@GewelReal If you have say 4 units and you have time of day pricing, middle of the day pricing 2x higher, you would want all 4 discharging to maximize your revenue, then charging overnight when the price is low. Buy low, sell high kind of thing.

  • @colchronic
    @colchronic 2 ปีที่แล้ว +15

    It's interesting to note that basically the tomahawk missile uses a type of molten salts battery that only initiates once the missile is launched

    • @pedrowhack-a-mole6786
      @pedrowhack-a-mole6786 2 ปีที่แล้ว +7

      Thermal batteries are ideal for rockets and missiles, light weight, high energy density, almost instant start-up, and they can remain usable for decades. The downsides are that they are single-use, the chemistry consumes itself upon use, and they have a very limited lifespan once activated. Their use is very nitch. They are cool though.

    • @Debbiebabe69
      @Debbiebabe69 2 ปีที่แล้ว +5

      @@pedrowhack-a-mole6786 Sort of like RTGs then. They have a very niche use but have often been touted as 'wonder-batteries' - in the case of RTGs, they can only provide the odd amp of power - but they will provide that amp day after day, week after week, month after month, year after year, and even decade after decade, without any need for feul or other consumable chemistry - making them ideal for remote locations barely if ever maintained - such as unmanned spacecraft, ocean marker buoys, earthquake monitoring stations, and the like.
      But utterly useless for general grid operations.

    • @ferrumignis
      @ferrumignis 2 ปีที่แล้ว +2

      @@pedrowhack-a-mole6786 _"nitch"_ Arrrggh...the guy in the video said this as well, so irritating. "Niche" is pronounced like "neesh", not "nitch".

    • @pedrowhack-a-mole6786
      @pedrowhack-a-mole6786 2 ปีที่แล้ว +2

      @@ferrumignis Though my spelling of the word niche was wrong, nitch IS an acceptable way to pronounce it. And for you, and your like, I will begin spelling it that way too. Have a nice day.

    • @ferrumignis
      @ferrumignis 2 ปีที่แล้ว +2

      @@pedrowhack-a-mole6786 _" nitch IS an acceptable way to pronounce it"_
      Absolutely not, it's unacceptable.

  • @BaronVonHobgoblin
    @BaronVonHobgoblin 2 ปีที่แล้ว +11

    The fact GE wanted to (business) scale quickly has absolutely nothing to do with the failure of this technology! The technology failed because GE as a company did not understand where their product classified in the Greater Engineering Cycle - GE failed to properly distinguish the current state of the many existing technological institutions and their unique inefficiencies before attempting to sell a straw panacea that, naturally, failed to address any of those individual unique inefficiencies! Though I do agree that this is as a standard case of malign Silicon Valley influence peddling and that GE's executives were being "unreasonable" for their choice to act like they were selling software. This case is a good lesson for those who work in the "legacy" mechanical engineering industry as they are best served by avoiding reading the "Good Ideas" of the likes of Steve Blank and Eric Ries as their ideas are inapplicable to how the mechanical industries innovate! I have a video up addressing this subject of the Classification of Technology which relates what I am referring to as "The Greater Engineering Cycle" in this comment.

    • @Trgn
      @Trgn 2 ปีที่แล้ว

      👍

    • @davidanalyst671
      @davidanalyst671 2 ปีที่แล้ว

      no, this failed because Jeffrey Immelt, the failure CEO was managing the process. Imelt destroyed everything he touched. Would you like to buy an oil company right now when oil prices are at historic records??? so would immelt

    • @BaronVonHobgoblin
      @BaronVonHobgoblin 2 ปีที่แล้ว

      @@davidanalyst671 you don’t take issue with any of my points, you are just being hollowly disagreeable.
      While you are not wrong, Immelt was the ultimate bearer of authority. You are also not right to blame Immelt for the engineering errors of his subordinates.
      If you’re going to talk like an angel investor it helps if you are actually an angel investor. It’s not like you invested anything in GE or Immelt.
      Why are you so retrospectively interested in a personal decision that is both beyond your control and technically unrelated to the underlying engineering problems? You are exhibiting the very same magical thinking for which you blame Immelt!

    • @woof059
      @woof059 ปีที่แล้ว

      Where is this video? I’m looking at your channel and see some stuff on war history and some playlists of other people’s stuff. Can you state the name of the video?

  • @jakenguyen7463
    @jakenguyen7463 2 ปีที่แล้ว +62

    Solar panels are increasingly more common on residential rooftops in the US now that costs have come down further, it's still quite the expense and residential battery purchase are often just put off and homeowners simply use the grid.
    In the coming years however, as solar panels are paid off, consumers will increasingly look toward their own battery options. Since weight isn't really a concern in buildings, lithium-ion alternatives do seem like a major market waiting for the right conditions.

    • @thomascrabtree
      @thomascrabtree 2 ปีที่แล้ว +3

      There isn't enough lithium on the planet to replace 5% of the current US car stock, let alone all cars worldwide. And you think 8 billion people will be using it as batteries for their homes? LOL no way, sodium is far more common, it's literally common table salt and easily available from the sea. Sure it can only hold 80% of lithium's max charge, but it's much more realistic for the future.

    • @Marco-hl6gz
      @Marco-hl6gz 2 ปีที่แล้ว +27

      @@thomascrabtree you understood the opposite of what Jake said

    • @remliqa
      @remliqa 2 ปีที่แล้ว +23

      @@thomascrabtree
      Firstly , this is factually false. We have more than enough Li supply to switch all the vehicles in the world to EV and have more to spare.
      Secondly, the OP was suggesting for Li alternatives , not Li batteries.

    • @remliqa
      @remliqa 2 ปีที่แล้ว +17

      @@Marco-hl6gz
      I think he just wanted to spread lie about Li supply (we actually do enough Li for the entire world) rather than engaging in honest debate.

    • @Mr424242424242424242
      @Mr424242424242424242 2 ปีที่แล้ว +9

      @@remliqa There might be enough overall, but the global supply in terms of extraction could not handle the battery turn over across the projected lifespan of the US automotive sector in addition to its other uses such as alloying and pharmacological production. Lithium extraction either needs to go up massively, which has its own environmental problems, primarily related to sulfur contamination of the tailings. It needs massively increased lifespan, which does not seem to be realistic considering gains in lifespan over the recent past. Or, we need to establish effective recycling of lithium batteries, which is something that has not been done at scale.

  • @ZeZeBatata69
    @ZeZeBatata69 2 ปีที่แล้ว +14

    $200M failure is a win compared to $1B "wins" in crypto, ads or casino games..

  • @Erika-mx2vj
    @Erika-mx2vj 2 ปีที่แล้ว +2

    Excellent analysis and not 2, not 3, but 4 hands. How couldn’t Asianometry be my favorite TH-cam channel?

    • @ADMIN-ln4dy
      @ADMIN-ln4dy 2 ปีที่แล้ว

      Whatsapp✙16188099963
      More updates on ETH,NFT’s,BTC📊
      Whatsap✙16188099963
      More updates on ETH,NFT’s,BTC📊
      👆 👆 👆

  • @Pnuematictoaster
    @Pnuematictoaster 2 ปีที่แล้ว +6

    GE creates "high temperature" battery and fails to realise it can't just replace a "cold" battery installation without serious modification. sounds like the sales guys took over from engineering and started to strap on features that didn't exist.
    I astound how GE, a gigantic electrical company, failed to understand the energy storage market.
    Seems like interesting technology, I hope they manage to course correct. People still use nickle iron batteries for grid or home storage, the increased physical footprint that the batteries required to match a lithium installation, is offset by the lower cost of obtain and maintain the battery.

  • @Kakkatz
    @Kakkatz 2 ปีที่แล้ว +6

    " This eclectic mix feels more like 2nd day fried rice to me; everything that happens to be in the fridge. " -Asianometry
    Thanks for giving us a new idiom to use lmao

  • @therealdebater
    @therealdebater 2 ปีที่แล้ว +2

    Top notch documentary from this channel, as usual. Much appreciated.

  • @leflavius_nl5370
    @leflavius_nl5370 2 ปีที่แล้ว +4

    "Which is cool, because i like submarines"
    That's such a simple truth. I like.

    • @ADMIN-ln4dy
      @ADMIN-ln4dy 2 ปีที่แล้ว

      Whatsapp✙16188099963
      More updates on ETH,NFT’s,BTC📊
      Whatsap✙16188099963
      More updates on ETH,NFT’s,BTC📊
      👆👆👆

  • @ericepperson8409
    @ericepperson8409 2 ปีที่แล้ว +24

    It's unfortunate that Li-ion is the dominant emerging battery technology. Lithium mining is ecologically devastating and should be a much more expensive process to offset its impact and encourage more operations to recapture and recycle them. The number of these frankly dangerous batteries that are being improperly disposed of is a looming disaster.

    • @GewelReal
      @GewelReal ปีที่แล้ว

      It's sadly always about the money, not for the better of humanity...

  • @TheDavidlloydjones
    @TheDavidlloydjones 2 ปีที่แล้ว +6

    How could a guy named "Immelt" fail to be a sucker for a molten salt promotion?

    • @davidanalyst671
      @davidanalyst671 2 ปีที่แล้ว

      Because he was destroying GE. as the CEO

  • @mattbland2380
    @mattbland2380 2 ปีที่แล้ว +9

    The Ambri liquid metal battery for grid scale storage is something I've been following for a few years and am interested in. I hope that they are more successful than the GE Molten Salt batteries.

    • @georgedang449
      @georgedang449 2 ปีที่แล้ว

      They're competing with good old gravity - far easier, far cheaper, far less stable. Why should a hydroelectric plant jump through the hoops to melt metal, when it can just pump water?

    • @gljames24
      @gljames24 2 ปีที่แล้ว +6

      @@georgedang449 Because it's not an instantaneous continual load leveling technology and not everywhere has the topology or water to use hydro electric batteries. Cheap sodium batteries would just work out better, be more functional, and scale better.

  • @weisenterprises
    @weisenterprises 2 ปีที่แล้ว +2

    Sodium-nickel-chloride batteries are currently in use in some Sandvik underground drill rigs

    • @ADMIN-ln4dy
      @ADMIN-ln4dy 2 ปีที่แล้ว

      Whatsapp✙16188099963
      More updates on ETH,NFT’s,BTC📊
      Whatsap✙16188099963
      More updates on ETH,NFT’s,BTC📊
      👆👆 👆

  • @agenericaccount3935
    @agenericaccount3935 2 ปีที่แล้ว +6

    "Molten Salt Walkman" does sound pretty baller.

    • @Travlinmo
      @Travlinmo 2 ปีที่แล้ว +3

      And great in northern Minnesotan winters.

    • @ADMIN-ln4dy
      @ADMIN-ln4dy 2 ปีที่แล้ว

      Whatsapp✙16188099963
      More updates on ETH,NFT’s,BTC📊
      Whatsap✙16188099963
      More updates on ETH,NFT’s,BTC.📊

  • @billmaghan
    @billmaghan 2 ปีที่แล้ว

    Your captions are perfect, and much appreciated.

  • @kevinbarry71
    @kevinbarry71 2 ปีที่แล้ว +17

    Seems strange for the CEO of GE to Lei? General Electric pretty much invented the concept of "creative accounting". A.k.a. accounting fraud but pulled back a little

    • @davidanalyst671
      @davidanalyst671 2 ปีที่แล้ว

      Jeffrey Imelt was the worst CEO in the history of CEO's. you're missing the point

    • @kevinbarry71
      @kevinbarry71 2 ปีที่แล้ว

      @@davidanalyst671 not missing the point; simply pointing out something

  • @davecool42
    @davecool42 2 ปีที่แล้ว +32

    I most enjoyed your commentary at the end about the endless thirst for growth. Growth for growth's sake is self-defeating, and this kind of grasping at straws proves it. Stability is where we should aim, even while the market craves volatility.

    • @kellyhofer
      @kellyhofer 2 ปีที่แล้ว +6

      Two economic models to support this are doughnut economics and steady-state economics. Something along this line is the only way forward in my opinion.

    • @autohmae
      @autohmae 2 ปีที่แล้ว

      @@BigFormula93 I'm honestly of the opinion these days: when we need big change only government regulations can create the right incentives for capitalism to do the right thing for society (or if we are lucky certain ambitious people's goal align, so basically luck and morality). And if we want to do anything big at the government level it's a global competition between countries so a sort of capitalistic free market between countries. Which means governments don't want to cripple their own economies/countries through regulations unless other countries will too. So something like COP26 failed.

    • @linmal2242
      @linmal2242 2 ปีที่แล้ว

      @@BigFormula93 Yes, 'tis called 'Survival of the Fittest' in other words: Evolution.
      And no, that does not mean going to the gym !

  • @mickinmerton8053
    @mickinmerton8053 2 ปีที่แล้ว +9

    Interesting. What about Ambri? I understand their mouton salt battery is being trialled for grid storage. It seems to be a better approach using cheaper materials and has better life expectancy. Bill Gates is one of the companies investors.

    • @DrewNorthup
      @DrewNorthup 2 ปีที่แล้ว

      Yeah, I'm kinda curious if they've scored any Asian partner agreements which is why I was watching this channel's video on molten-salt battery technologies to begin with.

  • @JohnnieHougaardNielsen
    @JohnnieHougaardNielsen 2 ปีที่แล้ว +3

    While premature scaling is indeed a big risk factor for failing, sometimes the "Field of Dreams" gamble of "if you build it, they will come" does lead to success stories.

    • @actually5004
      @actually5004 2 ปีที่แล้ว

      Physics and chemistry don't care about risk factors.

    • @JohnnieHougaardNielsen
      @JohnnieHougaardNielsen 2 ปีที่แล้ว

      @@actually5004 People possibly nearby a failing pot of molten salt care about of risk factors. And people asked to gamble on a high risk technology with poor prospects for success do also care. While I applaud people trying out new ways of doing things, it is just part of the game that most such projects will fail. Question is then how much money was burned before it became too hard to keep up the pretence that it was a viable technology to sell to the markets.

  • @hicknopunk
    @hicknopunk 2 ปีที่แล้ว +4

    The molten batteries I have heard of use heat pumps, to run engines, to melt aluminum. This should be interesting.
    Wait, so this is just another aluminum battery???

  • @thefrunj
    @thefrunj 2 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Great video, I enjoyed your humour! The background research for these videos must take you ages

    • @ADMIN-ln4dy
      @ADMIN-ln4dy 2 ปีที่แล้ว

      Whatsapp✙16188099963
      More updates on ETH,NFT’s,BTC📊
      Whatsap✙16188099963
      More updates on ETH,NFT’s,BTC📊
      👆👆👆

  • @kolbyking2315
    @kolbyking2315 2 ปีที่แล้ว +6

    My old chemistry Dr. Sadoway is working on similar molten-material batteries. Very interesting tech, GM didn't manage it well it seems.
    Edit: GE

    • @Jaker788
      @Jaker788 2 ปีที่แล้ว

      GE General Electric

    • @kolbyking2315
      @kolbyking2315 2 ปีที่แล้ว

      @@Jaker788 thanks, I generally get those confused

    • @penguinswithdynamite
      @penguinswithdynamite 2 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      I had Ambrii batteries in the back of my mind while watching this video as well. I thought they were the first ones thinking about molten salt batteries but it seems people have been researching it for quite a while. Lets hope Ambrii can learn from GE's mistakes and successfully sell batteries. In my mind molten salt batteries are one of the most promising stationary energy storage technologies and are better suited than lithium ion for stationary storage.

    • @kazedcat
      @kazedcat 2 ปีที่แล้ว

      They suffer the same problems. They need to scale up to be cost competitive but scaling up does not create the market. So if they organically grow their market their cost is not competitive but if they jump to quick scaling and reduce cost they have no market to sell.

    • @robsonrobson4999
      @robsonrobson4999 2 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      @@penguinswithdynamite Considering Ambrii Prof. Sadoway stated explicitely that it makes only sense to build molten salt batteries using cheap, earth abundant materials...

  • @jack504
    @jack504 2 ปีที่แล้ว +7

    It seems to me that the requirement to keep them hot (280dC) is a fundamental flaw. What percentage of the battery capacity do you need to use each day to keep the battery at operating temperature?
    There will be some variation with system size but it means using a lot of resources just to keep them ticking over, much more than the amount required to top off loses due to internal discharge on other battery systems.

    • @remliqa
      @remliqa 2 ปีที่แล้ว +4

      Not really, porotype shows that with good enough thermal insulation , you can keep a constants temperature with very little energy input once the desired temperature have been reached. Of course reaching them in the first place do take quite a lot of energy. The potential advantage is it should be dirt cheap to manufacture when it reach mass market as the material cost is relatively cheap . Of course it do have lower efficiency compared to Li battery.

    • @brodriguez11000
      @brodriguez11000 2 ปีที่แล้ว +2

      @@remliqa Aerogel insulation.

    • @remliqa
      @remliqa 2 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      @@brodriguez11000 I think Ambri was using something much cheaper and mundane than that in their prototype.

    • @user-qu2oz2ut2h
      @user-qu2oz2ut2h 2 ปีที่แล้ว +2

      I've seen several datasheets.
      One particular model discharges in about two days.
      Ceramic at this temperature works as a resistor and you need to remove heat from it. It keeps itself molten partially because of self discharge.

    • @seneca983
      @seneca983 2 ปีที่แล้ว +2

      "What percentage of the battery capacity do you need to use each day to keep the battery at operating temperature?"
      The battery charging and discharging heats it up (because the battery isn't 100% efficient) so you might not need separate heating most of the time.

  • @oasntet
    @oasntet 2 ปีที่แล้ว +7

    There's definitely room for this in grid storage in the future, though. Most importantly, lithium battery prices are going to skyrocket once the easy reserves of lithium have been exhausted and we have to switch from lithium brine pools / brine flats to ore sources. And then energy density is much less of a concern for stationary storage locations, and molten salt batteries ironically don't have the problem of spontaneous energetic explosion chain reactions like lithium ion...

  • @AAA-qd8xx
    @AAA-qd8xx 2 ปีที่แล้ว

    Image transfer is smoother! Thanks for great video as always

  • @FunkBallGX
    @FunkBallGX 2 ปีที่แล้ว

    Glasgow? My hometown that is only tangentially related to the rescue sub mentioned? Nice to see that show up on screen.

  • @johnkaplun9619
    @johnkaplun9619 13 วันที่ผ่านมา

    I had to move a bunch of these across a building in Grad school in New York. They are heavy. The PI whom they belonged to said they were a great technology but didnt have a great use case, which I think is the general consensus at this point.

  • @KayAteChef
    @KayAteChef 2 ปีที่แล้ว

    I believe the company i work for has recently purchased several of those GE Locomotives, however, we have not taken delivery of them yet. We take delivery of a few locomotives each year and we need to install some infrastructure before we can use the battery Locomotives.

  • @nexusyang4832
    @nexusyang4832 2 ปีที่แล้ว

    This was very cool!!! Learned something new today. :)

    • @ADMIN-ln4dy
      @ADMIN-ln4dy 2 ปีที่แล้ว

      Whatsapp✙16188099963
      More updates on ETH,NFT’s,BTC📊
      Whatsap✙16188099963
      More updates on ETH,NFT’s,BTC📊
      👆👆 👆

  • @scarkillerful
    @scarkillerful 2 ปีที่แล้ว +2

    This is very interesting, considering I drive by the CSIR in South Africa every day!

    • @ADMIN-ln4dy
      @ADMIN-ln4dy 2 ปีที่แล้ว

      Whatsapp✙16188099963
      More updates on ETH,NFT’s,BTC📊
      Whatsap✙16188099963
      More updates on ETH,NFT’s,BTC📊
      👆👆 👆

  • @snowdog03
    @snowdog03 2 ปีที่แล้ว +8

    Misread as Morton Salt. Lol

  • @Hectico2257
    @Hectico2257 2 ปีที่แล้ว +5

    Both for companies and countries, I absolutely love the way you make these case studies! Another home run!

  • @tigertiger1699
    @tigertiger1699 2 ปีที่แล้ว

    Another great vid👍🙏

  • @cinemaipswich4636
    @cinemaipswich4636 2 ปีที่แล้ว +2

    Molten Salt reactors are different from these batteries. Molten Metal Batteries are another thing, which use 3 liquid metals and run at about 800 C. These are suited to units the size of a small house.

  • @miscbits6399
    @miscbits6399 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Nickel metal hydride was deliberately crippled in the 1990s. Search for patent encumbrance of nickel metal hydride batteries to find the history

  • @donald1w12
    @donald1w12 ปีที่แล้ว

    Hey, I worked as a cell design engineer at the Durathon plant if you have any questions. Your video is very good..

    • @donald1w12
      @donald1w12 ปีที่แล้ว

      Btw GE licenced the technology to a Chinese company, and they are making Durathon batteries today.

  • @michaeldiesel3688
    @michaeldiesel3688 2 ปีที่แล้ว

    Very nicely done.

  • @scottstewart5784
    @scottstewart5784 2 ปีที่แล้ว

    IF you fill the molten battery with power, do you have to keep it hot? If it cools, does it retain the juice?

  • @ezragonzalez8936
    @ezragonzalez8936 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    G.E is the jack of all trades and the master of some they make everything ... the best MRI ct scan and other imaging machines to Locomotives and of course the most powerful Jet Engines ever that powered the Boeing 777X

  • @zbyszanna
    @zbyszanna 2 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    We now have many more use cases for battery storage, not only with vehicles. Renewable energy sources like solar start making much more sense of you are able to store the energy you get during the day and there are different considerations for such a system then there are for a vehicle. For example, the weight doesn't really matter, the efficiency doesn't also have to be as high and the deciding factor is cost and scalability.

  • @theharbinger2573
    @theharbinger2573 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Your end notes highlight why I dislike MBAs so much - The spreadsheet management style that can only accept constant growth and quarterly results above all else. Even it if means hobbling the company along the way. I am sure there are companies if fits okay with, but for technical, engineering base endeavors it is a great way to fail (I'm looking at you Boeing)

  • @dragnardrake8633
    @dragnardrake8633 2 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    wonder if it would ever be cost effective to put solar panels on top a hybrid train. I mean I'm assuming it wouldn't power the whole things, But if it already has a battery bank for an electric motor. Ideally they wouldn't be using heavy panels but the flex printable ones.

  • @SilverNuclear
    @SilverNuclear 2 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    They thought they could break into backup power with that, but ultimately, a traditional generator accomplishes all the same goals with a more established supply chain for support. High risk in a world of guaranteed stability.

  • @kasuha
    @kasuha 2 ปีที่แล้ว +2

    I guess we might want to return to this technology after we start running into lithium shortages. Also, I heard there was some substantial breakthrough in this area just recently, perhaps allowing to run such batteries at lower temperatures.

    • @absalomdraconis
      @absalomdraconis 2 ปีที่แล้ว +9

      This general type of battery (molten salt) is already in use, it's just that they're really only used for infrastructural stuff, e.g. the hardware at railroad crossings. Because of the heat they aren't really sensible for non-professional uses, and honestly _should never_ be targeted at the consumer market.
      For lithium-ion alternatives, I'd currently only be looking at sodium-ion (for hybrids & short-range), methane (because it can seamlessly transition to synthetic methane), etc. There isn't really likely to be any good alternatives to lithium ion for e.g. the US car market.

  • @ConanDuke
    @ConanDuke 2 ปีที่แล้ว +4

    7:22 No, she's not.

  • @TheOdinsLance
    @TheOdinsLance 2 ปีที่แล้ว

    I can't imagine what went wrong.

  • @tonamiplayman4305
    @tonamiplayman4305 2 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Love the Paris Hilton reference. "That's Hot"

  • @Mike__B
    @Mike__B 2 ปีที่แล้ว +3

    So the real question is whether or not GE, the gigantic mega-corp, owns all the patent rights to this technology hence stifling any innovation from others.

    • @ADMIN-ln4dy
      @ADMIN-ln4dy 2 ปีที่แล้ว

      Whatsapp✙14435307979
      More updates on ETH,NFT’s,BTC📊
      Whatsap✙14435307979
      More updates on ETH,NFT’s,BTC📊
      👆👆 👆

    • @k.chriscaldwell4141
      @k.chriscaldwell4141 ปีที่แล้ว

      Oh, you get bet on it. Them or some other they sold to. A person will be lucky if they don’t get a cease and desist order for buying batteries and salt at the same time.

  • @hylacinerea970
    @hylacinerea970 2 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    fun thing to think of as i get repeated medical imaging using GE machines since they’re the only brand that services me area

    • @ADMIN-ln4dy
      @ADMIN-ln4dy 2 ปีที่แล้ว

      Whatsapp✙16188099963
      More updates on ETH,NFT’s,BTC📊
      Whatsap✙16188099963
      More updates on ETH,NFT’s,BTC.📊

  • @AsbestosMuffins
    @AsbestosMuffins 2 ปีที่แล้ว +14

    The government really needs to fund electrifying some of the main cargo lines, our 3 big rail freight operators certainly won't ever even try, even though its constantly being shown it will pay for itself especially in high fuel cost years. the high up front cost is always the limiting factor even though once you have the lines and trainsets you're running for pennies on the mile for fuel

    • @shadow7037932
      @shadow7037932 2 ปีที่แล้ว

      Why should the government subsidize it? The government should just force the shitty companies to eat some profit loss and get it done.

    • @alexis1156
      @alexis1156 2 ปีที่แล้ว +3

      What the government needs to do is stay the f out of the way for the most part.

    • @certaindeath7776
      @certaindeath7776 2 ปีที่แล้ว +4

      europe is decades ahead of USA with rail infrastructure, and guess what. most of the infrastructure is owned by companies which are owned by the states. you can make private rail companies. but you use public rail infrastructure and pay your share to use it. u could even build infrastructure, but u would have to share it (and get payments for sharing your infrastructure).
      works fine, we have pretty dense rail infrastructure (could always be better^^), trains are reliable and the costs for the states are much much lower then maintaining car infrastructure.
      so yes. the US goverment needs the f to get hands on all the rail infrastructure and come up with a plan to expand and improve it.

    • @alexis1156
      @alexis1156 2 ปีที่แล้ว

      @@certaindeath7776 For every example of something good, there are 10 of government intervention that ends badly.
      Ill give you an example,opeq, they are all state owned companies, and they are ran very inefficiently because of it, they kept saying on the last few months especially that they were gonna increase production, but always failed, wanna take a guess why? It has mostly to do with how inefficiently they are managed.
      People who don't understand economics, who are weak etc... Have a tendency of relying on the government.
      I don't think people like you have looked around the world, government is not the medium through which competition and improvements come, government ownership leads to Venezuela, to China, to soviet Russia, to extremely inefficient work, because when you are the government you don't really care about efficiency much as there is no competition. Or in our cases you have corporations and government in bed together, which is another bad thing as it leads to more corruption on both the government and business side.
      There is a place for the government. The first question is what is a government and what is it supposed to do? A government main job is to protect the rights of it's citizen, and to protect it's borders. That means that the government primary job is military, courts and police. It doesn't say anything about continuing to meddle with the market at every turn, and to nationalize industries, or in general to have state owned means of production. There is another word for it, and depending on the variation, and how much is owned by the state, you have either socialism, communism, or fascism, which fascism is basically "The corporations should serve the interests of the government". China is an example of a fascist state at the moment.
      No, leave the free market alone. The only times a government should get involved is in very specific cases, like fraud, or scams to punish the people who are doing it, because that's protecting the rights of it's citizen, by punishing criminals.
      Also, id like to see where you got your numbers from.
      In any case, this kind of reasoning is very appealing to people who don't understand economics, but pretend they do.

    • @WaterZer0
      @WaterZer0 2 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      I like how both replies are polar opposite.

  • @NielMalan
    @NielMalan 2 ปีที่แล้ว +4

    Oh, this is interesting. I thought the Zebra battery technology became a dead end decades ago.

    • @thomascrabtree
      @thomascrabtree 2 ปีที่แล้ว +3

      Recent advances mean we no longer have to use molten salt, making it much more feasible. Sodium (salt) batteries look just like regular lithium ones these days, hold around 80% of the max charge, are much safer, but the best bit - infinitely cheaper and easier to recycle.

  • @johnmyviews3761
    @johnmyviews3761 2 ปีที่แล้ว

    Brilliant as usual!

    • @ADMIN-ln4dy
      @ADMIN-ln4dy 2 ปีที่แล้ว

      Whatsapp✙16188099963
      More updates on ETH,NFT’s,BTC📊
      Whatsap✙16188099963
      More updates on ETH,NFT’s,BTC📊
      👆 👆 👆

  • @joesilverbliss1721
    @joesilverbliss1721 2 ปีที่แล้ว

    You have it absolutely correct 👍.

  • @harshkhandelwal9456
    @harshkhandelwal9456 2 ปีที่แล้ว

    There was a recent closure of a solar farm in Nevada when there was a leakage in the molten salt battery, is it really that durable than what it is marketed to be?

    • @ADMIN-ln4dy
      @ADMIN-ln4dy 2 ปีที่แล้ว

      Whatsapp✙14435307979
      More updates on ETH,NFT’s,BTC📊
      Whatsap✙14435307979
      More updates on ETH,NFT’s,BTC📊
      👆👆 👆

    • @Travis0palzae
      @Travis0palzae 2 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      That was molten salt thermal storage used to run a steam turbine.
      I heard operating costs for solar thermal plants weren't competitive and that's why they closed.

  • @archerkee9761
    @archerkee9761 2 ปีที่แล้ว

    can you do a video on the new photon processors and the new players on this market?
    thank you for your videos, such good quality

  • @toyotagaz
    @toyotagaz ปีที่แล้ว

    South Africa is lacking when it comes to capitalizing on its recourses. its really sad

  • @nexusyang4832
    @nexusyang4832 2 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    9:56 - second day fried rice is definitely awesome, and yes, very chaotic.
    Chaotic neutral. 🤣😋🤗

    • @ADMIN-ln4dy
      @ADMIN-ln4dy 2 ปีที่แล้ว

      Whatsapp✙16188099963
      More updates on ETH,NFT’s,BTC📊
      Whatsap✙16188099963
      More updates on ETH,NFT’s,BTC📊
      👆👆 👆

  • @obsidianjane4413
    @obsidianjane4413 2 ปีที่แล้ว

    IIRC. GE wasn't spending of "its" (shoarholder) money on Durathon, but it was using "Green energy" grants from the 08 Stumulus funding. They pulled the plug when the federal money ran out. I leave it up to you to decide if the whole thing was a scam or not.

  • @x2ul725
    @x2ul725 2 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    OMG there are 48v batteries that you would pile to the moon inside Radio sites all over the nation. You can barely lift even one of them into a trunk.

    • @ADMIN-ln4dy
      @ADMIN-ln4dy 2 ปีที่แล้ว

      Whatsapp✙16188099963
      More updates on ETH,NFT’s,BTC📊
      Whatsap✙16188099963
      More updates on ETH,NFT’s,BTC📊
      👆👆👆

  • @5roundsrapid263
    @5roundsrapid263 ปีที่แล้ว

    Molten salt is incredibly corrosive, far worse than solid salt, which is also corrosive. I think there was a solar power plant in Arizona (?) that used it, but it leaked out, and it’s now abandoned.

  • @JoeOvercoat
    @JoeOvercoat 2 ปีที่แล้ว

    10:36 Topped by concertina wire not barbed wire. It is designed to collapse on interlopers. Nasty stuff.

  • @redhongkong
    @redhongkong ปีที่แล้ว

    i remember CATL already put sodium-blahblah battery into use, i heard they work well in cold temperature, but lack in every aspect compare to lifepo4. but just as safe and cheap as a lifepo4 can be.

  • @bobjoatmon1993
    @bobjoatmon1993 ปีที่แล้ว

    As I understand it, as a portable battery there's too many problems BUT would work well for grid storage to help even out the solar and wind fluctuations so perhaps it still has a future

  • @Unsensitive
    @Unsensitive 2 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    I was hoping it would be a discussion of molten salt nuclear batteries :)

  • @davidwilkie9551
    @davidwilkie9551 2 ปีที่แล้ว

    Waiting for the reheat second serve now.

  • @hillppari
    @hillppari ปีที่แล้ว

    we need more batteries like that. we have enough solar and wind but lack storage for when its not sunny or windy

  • @WalterBurton
    @WalterBurton 2 ปีที่แล้ว

    Yes, solid analysis. Turns out that the pie isn't infinitely large after all. 👍👍👍

    • @ADMIN-ln4dy
      @ADMIN-ln4dy 2 ปีที่แล้ว

      Whatsapp✙14435307979
      More updates on ETH,NFT’s,BTC📊
      Whatsap✙14435307979
      More updates on ETH,NFT’s,BTC📊
      👆👆 👆

  • @System0Error0Message
    @System0Error0Message ปีที่แล้ว

    toyota started with NIMH not NICD while GE used NICD. The big difference here is reliability and longetivity. NIMH lasts longer and can withstand harsher conditions compared to lithium even with the lower density making it a lot safer. There are also many other alternatives to molten salt batteries.

  • @HenkPoley
    @HenkPoley 2 ปีที่แล้ว

    Of course two thirds in (10:55) there is a nice market space analysis of battery storage facilities.

    • @ADMIN-ln4dy
      @ADMIN-ln4dy 2 ปีที่แล้ว

      Whatsapp✙16188099963
      More updates on ETH,NFT’s,BTC📊
      Whatsap✙16188099963
      More updates on ETH,NFT’s,BTC📊
      👆👆👆

  • @gblargg
    @gblargg ปีที่แล้ว

    Were any of those so-called hybrid engines able to run on electricity, or was all energy derived from fuel burning in its combustion engine?

  • @johnbirk843
    @johnbirk843 2 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    you seem to have missed MIT professor Donald Saturday, the creator of the AMBI"s liquid metal battery which runs at higher temperatures does not require constant heating actually charge and discharge takes care of that it has a safe mode that it simply goes solid and then you restart it again reliability has been reported to be extended to as much as well over a hundred years.
    Science Non Domus,
    (Knowledge has No Home)
    antiguajohn

  • @yash_kambli
    @yash_kambli 2 ปีที่แล้ว +3

    Molten salt batteries have utilise molten salt....wait, couldn't we directly connect it to solar thermal power plant to not only store but generate electricity? Then we don't even require steam generation and all that complexity. It would be direct conversion. I'm right?

    • @megalonoobiacinc4863
      @megalonoobiacinc4863 2 ปีที่แล้ว

      honestly i thought he was talking about a completely different tech at first, because as you mentioned solar towers use molten salt already. Its not for long time storage though, but as a short time storage (max a day?) and energy transfers between the focal point and steam turbine (just a guess, but even in this day most of our primary power still comes in the form of steam engines)

    • @kazedcat
      @kazedcat 2 ปีที่แล้ว +4

      No. Just because you have already melted the salt does not mean they are charged. This are rechargeable battery you need to charge them. Getting melted salt is just preconditioning so that the battery can actually be charged.

    • @brodriguez11000
      @brodriguez11000 2 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      @@kazedcat Plus the additional complexity added to the system.

  • @Muonium1
    @Muonium1 2 ปีที่แล้ว +3

    A Paris Hilton that's hot joke! I make that joke all the time because it's funny and amuses me and no one knows what the hell I'm talking about because I'm old and Paris Hilton thankfully hasn't been relevant for a decade now. But anyway, THAT'S HOT

    • @ADMIN-ln4dy
      @ADMIN-ln4dy 2 ปีที่แล้ว

      Whatsapp✙16188099963
      More updates on ETH,NFT’s,BTC📊
      Whatsap✙16188099963
      More updates on ETH,NFT’s,BTC📊
      👆 👆 👆

  • @WXSTANG
    @WXSTANG ปีที่แล้ว

    I liked the video because you gave your subscriber props for the subject. Way too many contributors do the same and never acknowledge the person helping them out.

  • @Oxazepam65
    @Oxazepam65 2 ปีที่แล้ว +2

    Can't wait to buy molten salt earbuds.

    • @markbajek2541
      @markbajek2541 2 ปีที่แล้ว

      Might be nice on a winter's run

  • @InfernosReaper
    @InfernosReaper ปีที่แล้ว

    Ignoring the trains use diesel engines to power electric motors part... it kinda really falls apart at the end with integration needs part. Integration systems *already* existed even then.
    Pretty sure that GE *already had* individual systems because that is part of their business to begin and most of these systems are designed around the national power grid standards.
    Even if they *somehow* didn't, just about anyone an Associates degree in electrical engineering could figure out a solution, especially since most of these use cases that are *described* differently are in practice actually the same and all need a certain key components regardless of the individual use case. Just off the top of my head, the vast majority of power backup systems basically come down to:
    --batteries
    --power source to charge batteries. If off grid, that would be the person's generator, solar, wind, etc.
    --an inverter with output current limiting to use the power from the batteries
    --an automatic switch to switch from source power to battery backup. I can't be sure if the majority of systems would need this, but enough do that it's worth mentioning as a common component.
    The inverter specs and storage capacity are generally what will varies the most. There may be *some* minor variants in other parts of some configurations, but for the vast majority of cases, it really is rather simple. In fact, that's a big part of what makes home solar and/or wind kits
    Again, this is just off the top of my head.

  • @ProkopHapala
    @ProkopHapala 2 ปีที่แล้ว

    would be nice to say more about Sodium-Sulphur, what is the problem ... since they are from plentiful raw-materials unlike Lithum bateries, so they are suitable for large scale grid backup

    • @ADMIN-ln4dy
      @ADMIN-ln4dy 2 ปีที่แล้ว

      Whatsapp✙14435307979
      More updates on ETH,NFT’s,BTC📊
      Whatsap✙14435307979
      More updates on ETH,NFT’s,BTC📊
      👆👆 👆

  • @aniksamiurrahman6365
    @aniksamiurrahman6365 2 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Hello, Mr. Jon. Lately, MIT professor Dr. Donald Sadoway and his student Dr. Bradwell made a lot of names in molten salt battery. Their startup Ambri has also received quite some attention. Now, Dr. Sadoway and Bradwell are mainly researchers. Still, what do you think about their invention? Whether the business model of Ambri actually works or not, what do you think of the technology?

    • @ADMIN-ln4dy
      @ADMIN-ln4dy 2 ปีที่แล้ว

      Whatsapp✙14435307979
      More updates on ETH,NFT’s,BTC📊
      Whatsap✙14435307979
      More updates on ETH,NFT’s,BTC📊
      👆👆 👆

  • @walterbunn280
    @walterbunn280 ปีที่แล้ว

    In general, any battery technology that uses lithium is going to fail if it's focus isn't "being as light as possible".
    The molten salt battery didn't just focus on being heavier than it needed to be, it had to underlying cost of being constantly heated significantly above ambient temperature.
    So it was never really meant to be viable technology that was implemented into existing infrastructure. It was a test of technology, and a grab at grant money.
    The fact that molten salt has nuclear development applications is probably not incidental.

  • @IDraganM
    @IDraganM 2 ปีที่แล้ว

    Thank you for an interesting video. may I request topic of "IR" (heat) lamps...I bought a few and keep getting surprised by them....for a start it appears to me that some of them which are supposed to produce invisible light seem fairly comparable to standard outdoor reflector light and if so much power is producing visible light....it is unlikely that much is left for IR side of the spectrum. They also seem to heat socket beyond expected levels, but are enclosed in plastic, and often have ducted fan designed to take heat away (usually under the roof) while heat is obviously needed in the bathroom. The whole design seems a bit strange to me...Unit I purchased has in instructions (one gets to find out about them after opening the box- if they read them) that it should not be used for longer then 30 minutes...but no visible thermal or timed cut-out system? Seems to me that someone is gambling with other people"s lives....

    • @compwiz00
      @compwiz00 ปีที่แล้ว

      Most the energy burned in any incandescent light is emitted as infrared light across an extremely wide spectrum, some is absorbed by the materials the bulb is made of and this heat is conducted into the socket instead of shining where you need it. The visible light you see is also converted to heat when it is absorbed, you can test this by observing how a big LED or laser which emits no IR light can still warm things up.

  • @georgeelkins8011
    @georgeelkins8011 2 ปีที่แล้ว

    Brilliant!

  • @Dancingleaf243
    @Dancingleaf243 2 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    The fried rice analogy was wonderful 🤭

    • @nexusyang4832
      @nexusyang4832 2 ปีที่แล้ว

      The memes always cut deep! :)

  • @teagueman100
    @teagueman100 2 ปีที่แล้ว

    It should have been able to fit into the grid storage market right?

    • @ADMIN-ln4dy
      @ADMIN-ln4dy 2 ปีที่แล้ว

      Whatsapp✙16188099963
      More updates on ETH,NFT’s,BTC📊
      Whatsap✙16188099963
      More updates on ETH,NFT’s,BTC📊
      👆👆 👆

  • @altGoolam
    @altGoolam 2 ปีที่แล้ว

    I wonder if those hybrid diesels are out there. Hopefully someone will dig them up.

  • @NoahGooder
    @NoahGooder ปีที่แล้ว

    i can see the potential in this. The molten salt backup system atleast.

  • @take5th
    @take5th ปีที่แล้ว

    Yet to see a former or present industrial, 19th century company make the shift to software driven digital systems at the same scale. Matter of will? Inertia? Misunderstanding of integration? Or just an inability for management to truly understand the digital landscape.