@@blaze102 yep, He is trying to find the volume of the ring by the water displacement. Water displacement is same no matter the density of the object. and if it is not touching the glass bottom then water displaced = volume of the object.
But there is a possibility that there could be other element with similar physical properties like gold I think best method would be testing through SEM but it's not practical
Could you please make a video how do you calculate in karats.
Thanks
Knowledge is power...thats smart 👍👍
Wow. That's cool. 👍
Im confuse on is g/ml same as g/cm3?
1cm3 equals to 1ml; therefore g/ml is the same as g/cm3
@@Mr.Bluefarmer it is valid only in case of water
@@blaze102 yep, He is trying to find the volume of the ring by the water displacement. Water displacement is same no matter the density of the object. and if it is not touching the glass bottom then water displaced = volume of the object.
Aren't you just supposed to bite it
But there is a possibility that there could be other element with similar physical properties like gold
I think best method would be testing through SEM but it's not practical
the only one could be tungsten
it should have been 13.7 Karat according to your calculation
No , if the weight in the water was 0.17 it would have been higher karat very close to 14K (13.07 specific gravity)
your calculation is wrong. please make a video in details.
Eureka!!!!!
This is not accurate! I wasted my time!
...do whhhaat??? 🤪
I’m gonna try to make a video that makes more sense. It’s pretty cool but it’s too complicated👍
10 carat gold isn't gold. Hahaha