Mankind's Strangest Attempts at Flight

แชร์
ฝัง
  • เผยแพร่เมื่อ 26 ก.ย. 2024
  • Secure your privacy with Surfshark! Enter promo code SIDEPROJECTS for 4 months EXTRA at surfshark.deal...
    This video is #sponsored by Surfshark.
    Warographics: / @warographics643
    MegaProjects: / @megaprojects9649
    Into The Shadows: / intotheshadows
    Today I Found Out: / todayifoundout
    Highlight History: / @highlighthistory
    Brain Blaze: / @brainblaze6526
    Casual Criminalist: / thecasualcriminalist
    Decoding the Unknown: / @decodingtheunknown2373
    Places: / @places302
    Astrographics: / @astrographics-ve4yq

ความคิดเห็น • 243

  • @Sideprojects
    @Sideprojects  3 หลายเดือนก่อน +5

    Secure your privacy with Surfshark! Enter promo code SIDEPROJECTS for 4 months EXTRA at surfshark.deals/SIDEPROJECTS

  • @ThaSandwitch
    @ThaSandwitch 3 หลายเดือนก่อน +33

    Multiple wings did have practical use, within reason. The reason Red Baron preferred triplanes is more wings meant better maneuverability at the cost of speed. Since biplanes and triplanes didn't move very fast to begin with, the ability to turn on a dime was of greater benefit for some pilots

    • @michaeltelson9798
      @michaeltelson9798 3 หลายเดือนก่อน +7

      The Sopwith Triplane was successfull, the difference was in the wing chords against the Fokker Triplzne that came later. The Sop Tripe could climb faster than the Fokker but not out turn it. It did have problems in dives which may have been to cheaper wires used by the contract companies building them compared to the original builder. Also, servicing wasn’t designed simpler and more efficiently. It was the step between the Pup and Camel and had notable combat successes with the RNAS its primary user.

    • @juliadagnall5816
      @juliadagnall5816 3 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      Didn’t triplanes have issues with the top wing disintegrating at high speed?

    • @michaeltelson9798
      @michaeltelson9798 3 หลายเดือนก่อน

      @@juliadagnall5816 it was in dives and Sopwith was convinced that the two companies that were also building them were using stay wire of inferior quality

    • @williestyle35
      @williestyle35 3 หลายเดือนก่อน

      ​@@juliadagnall5816 yes, because aeroplanes with multiple wings have more aerodynamic drag. The added drag at increased speeds would tear off the wings. This is partly why as time went on planes that held speed records had two or one wing.

    • @whyjnot420
      @whyjnot420 3 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      Richthofen did not prefer triplanes. For starters the Dr.I was too weak structurally and he only started to use it in earnest after this deficiency was fixed. He was also more successful in an Albatros. Then there is the fact that the plane he was gushing over at the end of his career was a biplane (Fokker D.VII) That he is associated with the Dr.I is a fluke of history. My guess is that it is because this is the plane he was shot down in.
      Also it should be mentioned, it was the short span of the wings combined with the all moving vertical stabilizer (same idea you see with modern supersonic jets) and extra bracing of the wings in the form of struts that allowed the Dr.I to turn the way it did. It was not simply a factor of multiple wings. Having more wings allowed for each wing to be shorter, increasing the load that could be placed on them. But even then, they still required extra bracing before they were suitable for combat.

  • @ignitionfrn2223
    @ignitionfrn2223 3 หลายเดือนก่อน +21

    0:35 - Chapter 1 - Ornithopters
    1:05 - Mid roll ads
    2:10 - Back to the video
    4:55 - Chapter 2 - Phillip's multiplanes
    7:40 - Chapter 3 - Gerhardt cycleplane
    9:50 - Chapter 4 - Helicopter backpacks
    12:35 - Chapter 5 - Flying tanks

    • @newman977
      @newman977 3 หลายเดือนก่อน +3

      Thank you for your efforts in providing theses!

  • @jakek6728
    @jakek6728 3 หลายเดือนก่อน +43

    Using a parachute as a safety precaution on a backpack helicopter sounds like something out of looney toons

    • @deadzio
      @deadzio 3 หลายเดือนก่อน +4

      Small aircrafts use parachutes ;) so why not on helicopters.

    • @jakek6728
      @jakek6728 3 หลายเดือนก่อน +4

      @@deadzio you're right, maybe they have explosives on the rotor so when the parachute is deployed it won't get caught up and they just hope the blades don't hit the pilot. If the pilot is still alive after 10 second the parachute opens

    • @johndoe-so2ef
      @johndoe-so2ef 3 หลายเดือนก่อน +6

      I'm sure it was made by Acme 😂

    • @scottwilliams7683
      @scottwilliams7683 3 หลายเดือนก่อน +5

      Or Inspector Gadget

    • @SgtSupaman
      @SgtSupaman 3 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

      They just need to make sure they include the eject button so the large spring will fling you clear of the blades.

  • @crwydryny
    @crwydryny 3 หลายเดือนก่อน +7

    The backpack helicopter reminds me of a line from the web comic "schlock mercenary" when a very enthusiastic character discovers that the power armour he has been given has the ability to fly
    "You know what we call flying soldiers on the battlefield? Skeet"

  • @liamrescorla6670
    @liamrescorla6670 3 หลายเดือนก่อน +247

    Mankind’s strangest attempt at flight was when The Undertaker threw him off the Hell in a Cell

    • @the80hdgaming
      @the80hdgaming 3 หลายเดือนก่อน +21

      Bruh... Best comment ever... 😂😂😂😂

    • @terrynixon2758
      @terrynixon2758 3 หลายเดือนก่อน +9

      Here before this comment blew up

    • @oohahitsanrccar1913
      @oohahitsanrccar1913 3 หลายเดือนก่อน +4

      😂

    • @lilesmw
      @lilesmw 3 หลายเดือนก่อน +4

      Excellent

    • @clintonpangburn3698
      @clintonpangburn3698 3 หลายเดือนก่อน +13

      I'm not even going to try. Here ya go 🏆

  • @JustaMuteCat
    @JustaMuteCat 3 หลายเดือนก่อน +4

    That Hitman exit made me do a double take. Well played, video editor, well played. 4:50

  • @carringtont7632
    @carringtont7632 3 หลายเดือนก่อน +8

    Seeing some of those old newsreel footage definitely makes me want to re-watch "Those Magnificent Men in Their Flying Machines, or How I flew from London to Paris in 25 hours and 11 minutes". But at least I know now that the collapsing Cycleplane and the hopping helicopter thingy were from actual newsreels and not just made up for the movie.

  • @whyjnot420
    @whyjnot420 3 หลายเดือนก่อน +6

    Horatio Frederick Phillips and his 1904 (21 airfoils) & 1907 flying machines (200 airfoils) are the pinnacle of insanity. Even the Caproni Ca.60 pales in comparison. Though I still love the Ca.60. How can you not?

  • @philiphumphrey1548
    @philiphumphrey1548 3 หลายเดือนก่อน +4

    In world war 1 triplanes such as the Fokker and Sopwith Triplanes did have some advantages, high rate of climb and maneuverablilty, also relatively short take-off distance (eg. for a fighter launched from a ship). The problem was that it was at the cost of speed and even in WW1 the combination of speed and the right tactics generally trumped maneuverablity in a fight.

    • @williestyle35
      @williestyle35 3 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      In part because speed allows fighter pilots to choose where and when to fight, while maneuverability aids in close or melee fights.

  • @kananisha
    @kananisha 3 หลายเดือนก่อน +12

    Go go gadget backpack 😂

  • @ianmcpherson2301
    @ianmcpherson2301 3 หลายเดือนก่อน +9

    Richard Pearce is so often not mentioned when it comes to mans early flight. Yet there is a claim that he may have actually flown before the Wright Bros.

  • @BaronVonQuiply
    @BaronVonQuiply 3 หลายเดือนก่อน +4

    The first guy to test a wingsuit had an amazing flight.
    The second guy to test a wingsuit brought a parachute so he could have an amazing flight and then also land, too.

    • @nunyabiznez666
      @nunyabiznez666 3 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      You ever see the video(s?) of wingsuit person landing without a chute? 0_o
      I know one landed into a giant stack of cardboard boxes. For some reason I'm picturing one landed on a giant sloped ramp as well, but don't quote me on that 🤪

    • @BaronVonQuiply
      @BaronVonQuiply 3 หลายเดือนก่อน

      @@nunyabiznez666 Oh, I completely forgot about that Red Bull cardboard box landing despite seeing it randomly earlier in the month

  • @robertreynolds1044
    @robertreynolds1044 3 หลายเดือนก่อน +5

    My dad was a model maker for Douglas and was part of the C-17 project, he would have loved the shot of the guy with the mini wind tunnel, using his pipe smoke!My name is Bicycle Bob and I approved this message and I think that he was part of the B-2 program, but of course he couldn't talk about it.

  • @feathermerchant
    @feathermerchant 3 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    Photo at 3:12 is of Otto Lilienthal with one of his successful GLIDERS (not an ornithopter) who was an inspiration to the Wright Brothers.

    • @williestyle35
      @williestyle35 3 หลายเดือนก่อน

      Thank you for pointing this out. Gliders have had such an important part in the history of human flight, yet I feel we overlook and forget about this now.

  • @zogzoogler
    @zogzoogler 3 หลายเดือนก่อน +10

    Winged Tank a thing of the past?
    A10 Thunderbolt …Hold My Beer

    • @Shinzon23
      @Shinzon23 3 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

      IL2 would like a word

    • @MisterOcclusion
      @MisterOcclusion 3 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      Mike Sparks has a proposal for you 😂

    • @thomashayhurst6547
      @thomashayhurst6547 3 หลายเดือนก่อน +3

      Only the A10 isn't a flying tank. The Aerogavin however...

    • @williestyle35
      @williestyle35 3 หลายเดือนก่อน

      ​@@thomashayhurst6547 correct. The A 10 was meant to be a "tank buster", that just happened to have an armoured cockpit and an unusually large rotating cannon for an aircraft...

    • @thomashayhurst6547
      @thomashayhurst6547 3 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      @@williestyle35 also correct, only problem is it couldn't bust tanks even when it was new

  • @JETWTF
    @JETWTF 3 หลายเดือนก่อน +4

    The Snow Bird was only partially capable of human powered flight, it could not achieve flight on it's own but the human could work the wings to maintain altitude once it was gliding and only at gliding speed, they could not go faster and if they did not keep up the pace the speed would decrease enough to start losing altitude. Thus only partially capable of flight... well maintaining flight until the pilot is too tired is what it did.

    • @jamesengland7461
      @jamesengland7461 3 หลายเดือนก่อน

      Exactly. Like an idiot with a tarp jumping off a cliff, only slower.

  • @TheJadeFist
    @TheJadeFist 3 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

    The backpack helicopter, aside from it looking like a death trap, at that point you may as well simply have a compact 1 man helicopter that you could park and fold up.

  • @JerryListener
    @JerryListener 3 หลายเดือนก่อน +9

    I love how the Wright brothers' main rival Langley was such a hater that he claimed his boat-launched flight was the first flying machine. It was basically a grift, and instead of owning up to it, he bad mouthed the Wright bros wherever he went. He laughingly has an airport named for him in America.

    • @williestyle35
      @williestyle35 3 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      Not only an airport, one of the US's first aircraft carriers was named after Langley. You are correct - he was nothing more than a carpetbagger and often a hater.

  • @dvsreed
    @dvsreed 3 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

    The biggest problem with the helicopter backpack is the same one that the jetpack has.......fuel. Carrying enough fuel for extended flights makes the backpacks to heavy to fly. Jetpacks look cool in Bond films but they only fly for a couple of minutes.

  • @Cs13762
    @Cs13762 3 หลายเดือนก่อน +3

    obviously ornithoptors are impractical. but it's still an interesting excersize. i know working on that isn't as practical as managing finance or studying to become a doctor or something, but i still think that kind of stuff is fun.

    • @goosenotmaverick1156
      @goosenotmaverick1156 3 หลายเดือนก่อน

      I'm sure if you really get down to it, plenty of handy, helpful or breakthrough inventions/discoveries may have happened while someone was working on a project that may seem "impractical" or "pointless" by most folks standards. For that reason, I agree. I find it fun.

  • @ZomBeeNature
    @ZomBeeNature 3 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

    I bet everyone in the world has seen that collapsing wing footage some time. 😊

  • @kattphud
    @kattphud 3 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    0:14 Would you say, it's been a long road, getting from there to here?

  • @Justin_Saves
    @Justin_Saves 3 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Great episode! Thank you! 🎉😊

  • @dddon513
    @dddon513 3 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

    No ornithopters, but human powered flight has been done. Both with traditional fixed wing style and I think one with helicopter style rotors.

    • @kenbrown2808
      @kenbrown2808 3 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      yes, the gossamer albatross was a human powered fixed wing, and I recall seeing someone managed a human powered rotorcraft that was capable of flight in still air.

  • @ZOB4
    @ZOB4 3 หลายเดือนก่อน +7

    Witnessed the rare event of Factboi wearing the same clothing in the ad read as the main video! Lucky day for us

    • @deadzio
      @deadzio 3 หลายเดือนก่อน

      What ads?? 💁

  • @alecogden12345
    @alecogden12345 3 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

    I didn't realise that contraption in chicken run had a name

    • @goosenotmaverick1156
      @goosenotmaverick1156 3 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      Did we just become best friends 😂
      That is such a classic IMHO

  • @dereks1264
    @dereks1264 3 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Many aircraft manufacturers (notably Airbus) are still trying to develop aircraft that are inspired in whole or in part by dragonflies --- which are the most awesome things that fly ever.
    As an aside, I once heard a helicopter pilot describe flying a helicopter as "trying to juggle, standing on a skateboard that's perched on a yoga ball".

  • @seanmalloy7249
    @seanmalloy7249 3 หลายเดือนก่อน +5

    The T-60 was a Russian light tank, designed as a stopgap measure to replace the heavy losses suffered by the tank corps in the early days of WWII, and able to be produced by factories unable to handle dedicated tank production. It had a maximum armor thickness of 20mm, and a 20mm TNSh cannon as its main armament, later upgraded to a 45mm cannon. The designation and even the _role_ of 'main battle tank' did not exist until the production of tanks like the British Centurion at the end of WWII.

  • @Jayjay-qe6um
    @Jayjay-qe6um 3 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Ornithopter only implemented in small scales, but ones large enough to transport people run into extremely difficult problems of materials, science and power efficiency.

  • @szeredaiakos
    @szeredaiakos 3 หลายเดือนก่อน

    We are still using Philips's multi-wings for special drag and lift requirements.

  • @jsl151850b
    @jsl151850b 3 หลายเดือนก่อน

    *Glider + Thrust! Duh!*
    *What about the variable pitched vanes that are horizontal to push down on air but vertical on the upstroke?*

  • @SmartAnthony-nb9ds
    @SmartAnthony-nb9ds 3 หลายเดือนก่อน +43

    *I love the grounded reality of this channel!!!*
    Retirement took a toll on my finances, but with my involvement in the digital market, $27,000 weekly returns has been life changing. AWESOME GOD❤️

    • @SmartAnthony-nb9ds
      @SmartAnthony-nb9ds 3 หลายเดือนก่อน

      Bible is supernatural. A relationship w Jesus is supernatural. I started a three days fast this morning. Thank you for this message. I'm 47yrs old $27,000 biweekly and I'm retired, this video have inspired me greatly in many ways!!!

    • @ChristopherSykes-gk2qu
      @ChristopherSykes-gk2qu 3 หลายเดือนก่อน

      Awesome how do you make such monthly, am a born Christian and sometimes I feel so down 😭 of myself because of low finance but I still believe God😞

    • @SmartAnthony-nb9ds
      @SmartAnthony-nb9ds 3 หลายเดือนก่อน

      Thanks to my co-worker (Alex) who suggested Ms Maria Luisa Abrams.

    • @SmartAnthony-nb9ds
      @SmartAnthony-nb9ds 3 หลายเดือนก่อน

      She's a licensed broker in the states 🇺🇸

    • @SmartAnthony-nb9ds
      @SmartAnthony-nb9ds 3 หลายเดือนก่อน

      After I raised up to 325k trading with her I bought a new House and a car here in the states 🇺🇸🇺🇸 also paid for my son's surgery (Oscar). Glory to God.shalom.

  • @Luvmydeuce
    @Luvmydeuce 3 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Often forgotten, but back in 2012, there was a "successful" flying machine created by Floris Kaayk of the Netherlands. It had a web page, with many photos of the machines development. Later, there was even a video of his successful attempt to flap his arms using Wii remotes to control the wings to gain altitude.
    Turns out it was an elaborate hoax that fooled many legitimate magazines that had to retract their articles.

  • @kenbrown2808
    @kenbrown2808 3 หลายเดือนก่อน +7

    "tanks descending from the heavens is a thing of the past"
    A-10 Warthog has entered the chat.

    • @rubiconnn
      @rubiconnn 3 หลายเดือนก่อน

      There is nothing similar between an a10 and a tank

  • @jeremythornton433
    @jeremythornton433 3 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Great to be from Toronto!

  • @AvB.83
    @AvB.83 3 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    I mean... yeah, flying by flapping wings would be great, but I'd take gliding as well. With modern materials, who knows what's possible. It feels kinda odd that we're still not even remotely close to actually "conquering" the skies.

  • @LordDustinDeWynd
    @LordDustinDeWynd 3 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    Howdy from Temple, Texas, USA!

  • @fredblonder7850
    @fredblonder7850 3 หลายเดือนก่อน

    4:32: That’s clearly an entomopter.

  • @BaronVonQuiply
    @BaronVonQuiply 3 หลายเดือนก่อน

    10:38 Go-go-gadget Bad Idea!

  • @LoPhatKao
    @LoPhatKao 3 หลายเดือนก่อน

    megaprojects idea: Simon's youtube subscriber plaque storage

  • @zvast
    @zvast 3 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    Ornithopters work fine on Dune

  • @anonymustly7818
    @anonymustly7818 3 หลายเดือนก่อน

    One of the funniest things I've watched.

  • @maxstrong6915
    @maxstrong6915 3 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Lol the 50 wing plane. I look at a water strider and don't see the efficiency, I just see it as if I grow 500 feet taller and a few extra legs that I too can walk on water

  • @rudycramer225
    @rudycramer225 3 หลายเดือนก่อน

    ...outweighed any potential advantage a backpack helicopter could have provided, which as far as we can tell is....NONE!

  • @Have.An.AmicoDay
    @Have.An.AmicoDay 3 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    Take off of the 200 winged aircraft is incredible... if it did it at 30mph...

  • @Radoye
    @Radoye 3 หลายเดือนก่อน

    I'm disappointed there was no mention of flying submarines in this video!

  • @derekstein6193
    @derekstein6193 3 หลายเดือนก่อน

    0:54
    It doesn't matter how he flaps it. It's simply a matter of weight ratios. A 500 pound ornithopter cannot carry a 200 pound man.

  • @petermerchant4439
    @petermerchant4439 3 หลายเดือนก่อน

    I gotta admit, the helicopter backpack sounds pretty cool. I wonder if 21st century sensors/computer technology could help with that...🤔

    • @TheJadeFist
      @TheJadeFist 3 หลายเดือนก่อน

      As long as you're cool with being seconds away from death at all times if absolutely anything goes wrong.

  • @KeithPrince-cp3me
    @KeithPrince-cp3me 3 หลายเดือนก่อน

    In the 70s i had a toy ornithopter made of plastic powered by a rubber band.

  • @Tripskiii
    @Tripskiii 3 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    simon i dont think saying that "saftey" is a key feature in vpn, when in public wifi, is factually wrong. it does 0 for your data if someone wants it.

  • @michaelcordes
    @michaelcordes 3 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    Please Simon I've lost count of how many times I've put this in comments to vids of your many channels. It's AEROPLANE

    • @AtheistOrphan
      @AtheistOrphan 3 หลายเดือนก่อน

      Sadly he prefers to use the American term. He also mistakenly says “Aircrafts” rather than the correct ‘Aircraft’.

    • @gypsydildopunks7083
      @gypsydildopunks7083 3 หลายเดือนก่อน

      America rules #1, everything else is Crrrrrrrrrrap. Wait, maybe that was Scottish

    • @TheJoyofSix
      @TheJoyofSix หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      There are two acceptable terms for airborne devices.
      1, Aeroplanes
      2, Flying Machines

    • @AtheistOrphan
      @AtheistOrphan หลายเดือนก่อน

      @@TheJoyofSix - Aerial perambulators? ✈️

  • @BaronVonQuiply
    @BaronVonQuiply 3 หลายเดือนก่อน

    An aging Scottish pilot, one of the few remaining alive from WWII visited a girls' school one day to entertain them with war stories in their history class.
    _"So there I was when suddenly two Fokkers come over the horizon at me"_ the students giggle and their teacher jumps in to clarify _"Now, girls, a Fokker was a very common manufacturer of airplanes at the time"_ _"Aye, that it was."_ the elderly pilot nods in agreement, _"Only these two Fokkers were driving Messerschmitts"_

    • @AtheistOrphan
      @AtheistOrphan 3 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      Stan Boardman, circa 1975.

    • @BaronVonQuiply
      @BaronVonQuiply 3 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      @@AtheistOrphan Oh, I had no idea the guy I stole it from stole it too.

    • @AtheistOrphan
      @AtheistOrphan 3 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      @@BaronVonQuiply - Ha Ha! Good one!👍

  • @hervigdewilde3599
    @hervigdewilde3599 3 หลายเดือนก่อน

    I had one of those backpack helicopters for my ActionMan. 😃

  • @xpndblhero5170
    @xpndblhero5170 3 หลายเดือนก่อน

    How ridiculous that backpack helicopters are a thing now.... Just smaller helicopters but still. 😂

  • @voornaam3191
    @voornaam3191 2 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Winged tanks? Great, but how did these tanks get to Mach 5? I estimate that is the airspeed you need to lift those 60 thousand pound battle tanks. Why didn't the aviation engineers run away laughing? This idea was a three year old toddler idea, was it? Megalomannski, right?

  • @andreaadams7844
    @andreaadams7844 3 หลายเดือนก่อน

    😊favorite. This stuff is best content ever!

  • @brucekempthorne3086
    @brucekempthorne3086 3 หลายเดือนก่อน

    An electric gyrocopter backpack might be possible today. Carbon fiber blades controlled by a GPS auto pilot would give the pilot simple 4 axis control. A couple of well places joysticks on a soldiers main tool (don't want my comment deleted) and you have flying soldiers. Then its our turn.

  • @snarl3027
    @snarl3027 3 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    “50 wing coal fire powered” I’ll pass 😅

  • @warrenjohnknight.9831
    @warrenjohnknight.9831 3 หลายเดือนก่อน

    There was a successful flight here in New Zealand before the Wright Brothers, by farmer engineering man, Mr Pearse, sadly there wasn't any official evidence but the locals watched and agreed. It's now in the museum of transport and technology in Auckland New Zealand, 😊😊😊😊.

    • @jamesengland7461
      @jamesengland7461 3 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      If it could not be repeated and verified, it was pointless anyway.

  • @kineuhansen8629
    @kineuhansen8629 3 หลายเดือนก่อน

    a long road from there to here

  • @Cs13762
    @Cs13762 3 หลายเดือนก่อน

    during the afghan and iraq wars my friend's grandfather piloted a plane that dropped parachute tanks

  • @danielhenzphotography
    @danielhenzphotography 3 หลายเดือนก่อน

    It's been a long road getting from there to here, I've got faith....

  • @johnransom1146
    @johnransom1146 3 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    Militaries should have to fund themselves with bake sales

    • @jamesengland7461
      @jamesengland7461 3 หลายเดือนก่อน

      You go ahead and live in a country like that. I'll stay in a country that takes defending itself from conquering neighbors seriously, and remembers little historical events like WW1 and WW2 and the Iron Curtain and Rwanda genocide....

    • @johnransom1146
      @johnransom1146 3 หลายเดือนก่อน

      @@jamesengland7461 the USA didn’t enter either world war until late in the game. You also had nothing to do with the Rwandan genocide. It was Canadian peacekeepers.

  • @giannidcenzo
    @giannidcenzo 3 หลายเดือนก่อน

    More wings! We need more wings!

  • @robertreynolds1044
    @robertreynolds1044 3 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Fifty wings, and a coal-fired power supply?!, WTF. My name is Bicycle Bob and I approved this message.

  • @memyself3510
    @memyself3510 3 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Chapter one: 0 mana 0/1 flyers

  • @AeroGuy07
    @AeroGuy07 3 หลายเดือนก่อน

    I'm just here for the flying tank.

  • @kiwi_comanche
    @kiwi_comanche 3 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Seen a lot of Bell 212s lately 😂

  • @chriswoodend2036
    @chriswoodend2036 3 หลายเดือนก่อน +4

    Human powered Ornithopters are impossible on Earth, but not on Titan. FUND. NASA.

    • @AtheistOrphan
      @AtheistOrphan 3 หลายเดือนก่อน

      Somehow I don’t think that’s going to happen anytime soon. Interesting concept though.

  • @gypsydildopunks7083
    @gypsydildopunks7083 3 หลายเดือนก่อน

    No PeterCopter? What the hell

  • @darranwilkins4648
    @darranwilkins4648 3 หลายเดือนก่อน

    those magnificent men in there flying machines they goo uupppp tar upp upp the go dwn didly down down what a movie❤🎉

  • @michaelo3599
    @michaelo3599 3 หลายเดือนก่อน

    German backpack copter: spezielle Luftwaffentechnologien🧐🤓
    Merican: Hoppi-Copter🤡

  • @KaizersPOV
    @KaizersPOV 3 หลายเดือนก่อน

    6:16 inline what enegine?

  • @N71403
    @N71403 2 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Gossamer albatross

  • @jasondaniels1647
    @jasondaniels1647 3 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Idea for episode... the floating pear of the coast of Israel... how it was a waste of money

  • @aguynamednathan
    @aguynamednathan 3 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

    Comments this early will never take flight.

    • @SaiakuNaSenshu
      @SaiakuNaSenshu 3 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      We come here for fact boy not to gibber jabber

  • @sarahwisniewski6722
    @sarahwisniewski6722 3 หลายเดือนก่อน

    I saw this as a new video at one minute up. It's funny and kind of nice how the little things can make one smile.

  • @Jmodderator
    @Jmodderator 3 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Skip to 2:10.

  • @jamescollins345
    @jamescollins345 3 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Human powered ornithopters aren't impossible, they're impossible on Earth. With a lower gravity but sufficiently thick atmosphere such as domed habitats or tall enough underground habitats on Mars, the Moon, or other places like them I see no reason such things couldn't be a lot of fun. If at first you don't succeed change all the parameters.

  • @Crioten
    @Crioten 3 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Starfishes

  • @acmotorsport22
    @acmotorsport22 3 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Is nobody going to mention the beard anomaly in this vid?

  • @ThorstenWirth
    @ThorstenWirth 3 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Flying tanks and no A-Team footage? Shame be cast on the editor.

  • @GDTRFB
    @GDTRFB 3 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    Go Bills 🦬🦬🦬

  • @mcpinball1
    @mcpinball1 3 หลายเดือนก่อน

    The Only Plane Iv Bin On
    Is SNOOPY , The Wet Office Weather Plane
    At An Air Show
    Back In The Day
    Me Dint Flick Any Button & Thought My Mum Had Abandoned I
    When Me Left The Cockpit
    Mum Was Still Chattin Up The Pilot
    !+)

  • @voornaam3191
    @voornaam3191 2 หลายเดือนก่อน

    No. You all just babbel. Landlubbers can't sail a ship, and they suck at flying, and even thinking often gets awkward. Except, that is, the ones who have ever flewn a Pitts Special, or something similar. Shorter wings allow you to roll a whole lot faster. That is what more wings are all about. And then there is the problem that long wings simply break off, when you ask them to push you up really hard. Strength, you know? Short things ARE stronger.

  • @Razmoudah
    @Razmoudah 3 หลายเดือนก่อน

    I expect air-dropped tanks will become a thing once they figure out how to rig a powered thrust drop cradle that can be used in active combat and can slow the weight of everything enough to make the landing survivable. Drones may be good for striking at a target, but tanks are an order of magnitude or three better at holding an area.

  • @HondaMonkeyMan
    @HondaMonkeyMan 3 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Does farting count?

  • @jackvos8047
    @jackvos8047 3 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Human powered ornithopters may possibly work on Titan.

    • @AtheistOrphan
      @AtheistOrphan 3 หลายเดือนก่อน

      True, but you’ve got to get the humans there first.

  • @AHN1444
    @AHN1444 3 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    Well, now days, with A LOT OF MONEY, you could take the lightest material known to date, make angel size robot wings on vest, (no using hands to flap, the wings should flap on their own)

    • @omgandwtf1
      @omgandwtf1 3 หลายเดือนก่อน

      I think the current limitation to jet packs and other self propelled devices is fuel efficiency, there is a working jet pack you can get 20+ feet off the ground and go fairly fast but it's only got like 2 miles of range while using very expensive fuel and there's obviously the issue of excessive noise and the difficulty of managing Arial traffic and the problem of If you're jetpack fails not only see you in danger so is anyone below you especially considering the highly combustive highly compressed fuel and the ensuing explosion that seems a likely result of a crash.

    • @AHN1444
      @AHN1444 3 หลายเดือนก่อน

      @@omgandwtf1 yeah, it would have to be something extraordinary and it would be to fly 15 min and that is, there are some new fancy materials that can bend and return to original position maybe they can flap some robot wings with low power

  • @yourifriend4273
    @yourifriend4273 3 หลายเดือนก่อน

    The US airdrops Abrams tanks by parachute but not fixed wings all the time, which is one of the main roles of a C130 Hercules. Wings, I don't need no stinking Wings to drop a tank on you. Only for the first part

  • @erela9335
    @erela9335 3 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Not the vintage dude smoking a pipe directly into his science experiment 💀

  • @Just4FC
    @Just4FC 3 หลายเดือนก่อน

    What's with the heart shaped glasses?

  • @ARIXANDRE
    @ARIXANDRE 3 หลายเดือนก่อน

    I'm just a Brazilian hoping to hear the name of Alberto Santos Dummont, the true inventor of the airplane as we know it.

    • @deadzio
      @deadzio 3 หลายเดือนก่อน

      Never heard of him.

    • @benallen7704
      @benallen7704 3 หลายเดือนก่อน

      ​@@deadziobecause he didn't

    • @jamesengland7461
      @jamesengland7461 3 หลายเดือนก่อน

      He could not repeatedly or verifiably take flight, therefore he wasn't the guy.

  • @davidvavra9113
    @davidvavra9113 3 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Ornithopters are only impractical on this planet

    • @captainspaulding5963
      @captainspaulding5963 3 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      Convenient, considering we are on this planet.

  • @AyoIfa95
    @AyoIfa95 3 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

    10 seconds ago is crazy

    • @DocReaper88
      @DocReaper88 3 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      Right?

    • @aguynamednathan
      @aguynamednathan 3 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      Such a simpler time...

  • @Ulfhednir9
    @Ulfhednir9 3 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Can tell he is just reading the teleprompter in this one as he is only using silly measurements (imperial) which only makes sense in a couple of countries, instead of something that makes sense everywhere like metric... or Danny devetos

    • @captainspaulding5963
      @captainspaulding5963 3 หลายเดือนก่อน

      ...... ever since he stopped slapping scripts, he's been reading from a teleprompter.

  • @EGSBiographies-om1wb
    @EGSBiographies-om1wb 3 หลายเดือนก่อน

    150th

  • @XxAntisepticxX
    @XxAntisepticxX 3 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Hey I'm kinda early

  • @gsestream
    @gsestream 3 หลายเดือนก่อน

    whats the point of paying to get access to paying for things, double evil. about the wings, just make them large enough proportionally to carry a human. of course light also. if birds fly, then humans fly also. well just calculate how long tail and wing extensions a human needs to have to make similar shape and power to a bird. or scale down a human to a bird size, with wings and tail attached. people all of them are not combinedly smart enough. some stuff just hangs. just fly a pedalled kite airplane. yep make wing surface area great again. yep its not the efficiency but total lift, per surface area. better fly slow than not fly at all. no, wide narrow wings are not the best automatically, for all situations. human goals are just a burden.

    • @dalkay
      @dalkay 3 หลายเดือนก่อน

      Another problem though is that our bones aren’t hollow