Answer: space can and does move faster than light, otherwise the Universe could not have expanded so quickly into so large a space. It's the same reason why a "warp drive" is theoretically possible.
Could someone answer a question for me? If only one particle in a billion survived in the beginning, how did so few particles create everything? I'm no troll, or religious nut, I'm simply curious. Help me to understand. I was taught that matter cannot be created or destroyed, as a part of Newtons laws. So, wouldent matter have to have always existed?
It's slighty complicated. If you like, I'll try to explain. Newton's laws are only a good model for reality in the case of everyday length-, energy- and timescales. They also don't say anything specifically about the destruction of particles. Generally, the conservation of energy is valid. And if you have only low energy processes, mass is approximately conserved. If you want to look at the cosmos at all scales you'll find that the world is a lot better described by quantum field theory. Quantum field theory is basicly the marriage of quantum mechanics with special relativity. In quantum field theory you can have processes (they are also observed) of an electron and a positron annihilating and creating 2 photons as a result. Or you can have pairproduction of matter-antimatter pairs of particles from highly energetic photons. There are also many other processes that can destroy or create particles ... So in a simple picture: if you start with a universe that is just filled with a lot of energy, you'll have highly energetic photons (and other particles) that will decay into pairs of matter and anti-matter particles. And matter and antimatter particles will anihilate into high energy photons (and other particles) again. If you have the universe expanding, the photon energy will start to decease. That is: while they fly around, the space gets "streched" and the photons with it. So they end up having longer and longer wavelengths. At some point the energy of the photons is so low, that they cannot produce any more matter-antimatter pairs. So the production of matter and antimatter stops. You are then left with whatever matter and anti-matter the photons produced before that and that hasn't annihilated yet. But annihilation between matter and antimatter can still take place. So they annihilate ;) And everytime a matter particle meets it's corresponding anti-particle, they annihilate, producing photons until they do no longer meet anymore. Now, one of the interesting things about the universe is: there is a tiny asymmetry between matter and antimatter. The laws of physics slightly favour the production of matter over anti-matter (it's so extremely tiny that even measuring this effect is very hard). So after the energy of the photons dropped below the threshold for the production of matter-antimatter particle pairs, there was a tiny excess of matter. And when all the anti-matter had anihilated with matter, there was still matter left. Now how come we are surrounded by so many particles? Well there are a few things. For once: after the universe was "cooled down" enough so that the left over matter particles were not bombarded with very energetic photons, they could start to accumulate. So you would end up with concentrations of matter here and there. And from one of those accumulations of matter our galaxy eventually formed and all the stars with it. So you see: most of space is empty. The reasion why you see so much stuff around you is because you are in one of the few places where there actually is a lot of stuff. The space between galaxies is empty. The space between stars is also very empty (even the incredibly beautiful nebulas you sometimes see on pictures have so low densities that you wouldn't even notice them if you flew through one ... And then there is the other aspect: there simply is a large amount of matter. Eventhough only such a tiny fraction of matter "survived" the annihilation with antimatter in the early universe, there was just an enormous amount of it before that (there is direct evidence for that). All of that is a lot more complicated in reality, of course. But I still hope this massive simplification helped you a little bit ;)
It kinda did. So, what your saying is that after the big bang, and the annihilation process, what matter had survived eventually congregated into "pools" and began to form the celestial bodies we see today? This implies that billions, if not trillions and trillions of matter-antimatter reactions took place, to be able to provide enough matter to create so many planets, starts, and so-forth. Am I correct in that assumption or have I fallen of the map again. XD
TanoSithLord Yes, you are correct :) One has to keep in mind that the universe was incredibly dense in its early stage, so that particles could hardly move without bumping into other particles ...
Yano : When the alleged Big Bang happened , time and space expanded like a balloon and was packed full ,but as matter condensed and made planets , time and space continued to expand there is only so much matter but space/ time continue to expand creating the space between galaxy's .
***** Any explanation for why matter accumulated into chunks and isn't spread evenly throughout the universe? Obviously gravity is a culprit, but why did it favour certain directions over others? Why didn't all the matter just accumulate into a giant chunk (one badass black hole)? It's something to do with quantum fluctuations and the cosmic background radiation, correct?
How does antimatter respond to gravity? I read somewhere that we still don't know whether it attracts or repels other (anti)matter. Have trapped anti-atoms been subjected to tests of some kind?
That makes sense. Since the EM field and all others we know are stronger than gravity, the use of these fields to contain antimatter would make it extremely difficult to observe a gravitational effect. If the temperature of the antimatter is low enough and the trapping field could be turned off briefly, perhaps then the antimatter trajectory could be observed. Sounds pretty dodgy. Maybe cosmological observations, in which gravity rules, could answer the question?
While the consensus among physicists is that gravity will attract both matter and antimatter at the same rate that matter attracts matter, there is a strong desire to confirm this experimentally. Unknown at this point in time.
If there are matter realm and anti-matter realm, they couldn't be in the same universe. I believe that our universe in the Matter Universe and there is Anti-matter Universe is in different dimension which have everything that behave exactly the same as every matter in this universe.... i don't even understand what i was writing about....
Why does anything have had to have happened to anti matter at the beginning of time? It's a big universe. Can't it be that some of it just got blown so far away that it now sits off in some out of reach corner making it's own kind of the universe?
Also it seems maybe matter was stronger than antimatter. It's a simple answer but since they destroy each other (or seem to at least) the stronger one lives. Then again what if matter is actually antimatter and vice versa? Can we really consider antimatter to be what causes destruction, or maybe it's the power matter has when it comes into contact with antimatter. Not sure if what I'm saying even makes any sense lol. I have a lot of researching to do
So if a black hole has so much gravity that even light can't escape it....how could the big bang escape itself....since it would have so much more gravity than anyone could imagine...
+Alan Jay I wonder that too. Has kind of a scam/multi-level-marketing feel to it, with all the spam. Most of the comments are definitely bots - there's almost always a second comment saying "thanks for this" or something like that.
+Alan Jay Of course a dumb-ass will buy into anything. I am pitching a game show in Hollywood right now that has people eating their own shit for cash, called "Bottoms Up"!! I dare them and then the dumb-asses risk possible death and certain illness to eat their own shit as I offer increasing amounts of money until they munch out!! Dumb-asses Unite!!!!!! All hail the Dumb-asses!!!!!!!!!!
do not muck about with antimatter indoors. always experiment in the open, your garden or in the road for example. wear gloves and goggles and an outdoors coat. shout "antimatter" to give people some warning proceed with confidence.
At the end of this video, the question is asked "Just what is it that could break symmetry, hence trigger creation?" [paraphrased] To my mind, the much more intriguing question would be "just what type of field, or force, or event exists, or existed, that could bring into a physical realm, or appropriate vibrational/frequency state, a perfectly symmetrical ism/ion?" To me, this is, by orders of magnitude, a fantastically more difficult realization/state of matter/reality to create. Where there are an infinite number of ways to break symmetry, how many ways are there to create perfect symmetry? Zero? (not homo sapiens to create it...just anything, anyone, whatever)
what pseudoscientific bollox ... i had to stop at the " antimatter plume" at the galactic center.... its been perfectly explained by the electric universe , its plasma.
this topic is complex enough for lay people without careless editing : 17.58 complete nonsense "the electric field separates the electrons from positrons".. there are no electrons the e-field separates anti-protons and positrons 18.20 "then the molecule".. anti-hydrogen is an anti-atom not even an anti-molecule (which would be anti-H2) 20:00 the oddball molecule on the screen appears to be an anti-proton orbiting an alpha particle (He2+ nucleus) this is not explained at all
I want to know how the universe had a born on date?? What would have been there for it to be born into? Something was always there that has no beginning and no possible end. What would be there after? Always was always will be. Can not talk about "the big bang" without talking about how it even became to be or what was there before it.. Also it is "still growing", well into what!? And the bigger question what is it growing into? Space has been there forever literally and always will be there with no end! They keep talking about the universe beginning , it can not begin because what would be there before it "began" . What would be past "the end" ? It is impossible for a human brain or ANY artificial intelligence to ever understand. Everything is energy and that energy has always been in the universe and always will be. Cant make anything without it having been something else first . I challenge you to try to figure it out! It can not be explained!
If matter forms mass, could it go to reason that anti matter cannot form mass? Instead perpetually forcing apart? And if this be the case, and the fact that more anti matter is produced each day throughout the universe is considered, could it case the universe as we know it to expand faster and faster each day as we see?
my thought is similar to you.If matter can form mass(gravity as property) than antimatter can form antimass(antigravity as property), but due to very initial property of antigravity they cannot concentrete but tend to disperse. they should be distributed in entire space prabably 1unit/cubic meter or km or similar and it will not easy to detect.I have video regarding this on youtube
DonatoThomas you have not a clue. black hole cores are gravity made things that hold the exact potential to make space time exactly as we have it... to not go to black hole cores for the big bang is to say GOD DID IT...choose! Antimatter and matter make PURE ENERGY and the whole Universe space time you know is the LEFT OVERS not the antimatter or the matter but what was left over in matter... and things that come out of black hole cores become HYDROGEN and HYDROGEN made this Universe space time you know... no one can prove me wrong on this planet...do not try! it is ether a magical wave or 2 spheres... choose stupidity of waves or God did it or 2 black hole cores hit and one of them was made of antimatter...just happens to fit 100% correct to all events from the big bang to this day... so it has to be wrong???? grow up people!
NO you can't think anti matter is reversed in function IT IS NOT! All matter and anti matter act ALMOST exactly the same... a table in antimatter is exactly the same as one in matter but would explode in the AIR just touching atoms in the matter air...the composition of anti matter is simple positive and negative reversal of positions... on contact with the opposed on it turns each into energy instantly... they decompose to basic part of energy... then no one is really sure...since nothing is lost in Universe...what kind of energies were produced is now interesting to humans...light to heavy atoms are desired to be tested. For You to be asking me the question say you did not go look any of it up to learn it and know it for the rest of your life...why no just go learn how it works from the experts and pictures and all. Worth the effort!
NO, youir choices are God did from NOTHING or something made the things that made the big bang happen... and them things had to exist before the BIG BANG... so them things had to be spheres. Only by colliding 2 spheres can we make an event of such scale. the largest explosion since the big bang was 2 black hole core (or cold) stars hit together. it is them a simple conclusion that what they claim produced magical WAVES to make a big bang (hot dense state)...what was hot and what was dense? ENERGY moving faster than light speed by a factor of 80,000 times faster or more! Well nothing can do that BUT crushed by gravity atoms and crushed by gravity ANTI atoms.....well that is whol different story that can produce conditions to brake gravity 100% and for a short time spring all them atoms from crushed to free to expand..all at the same time! All matter and antimatter then changed to energy pure in waves and then cooled and slowed and spin and cycle to make stars and start the whole thing over....who knows? A universe might exist today on the other side that is antimatter and it makes stuff that gets loose and we make stuff that gets loose...one day might hit together and make another Universe like our OR like theirs. Ether way where did the hot dense state come from for the theory of the Big bang... what made them waves exist? What made them sub atomic exist? What made it so heat can happen or even density from waves (waves move at the speed of light in general...they can't be dense or hot..or is a ATOM state not subatomic)
"Inward spherical wave fronts multiplying time dilation at right+angles compressing+4-0-4+-decompressing expanding sphere's now dividing gravity at right-angles."
Ajay Kumar Singh No, the Flying Spaghetti monster did not create the multi-verses and other dimensions. He has been too busy pushing us down with his noodley appendages to keep us on Earth. This can not be an easy job.
Frank Allen Almost 14 billion years ago Chuck Norris made Spaghetti, then it got lose and Made Multiverse. Today it's known as our God. THE FLYING SPAGHETTI MONSTER !
No, the Flying Spaghetti Monster Escaped while Chuck Norris was checking his mail. You see, the pot he was boiling the noodles in overheated (no safety valves back then) and blew up causing the big bang. That's how the Spaghetti Monster escaped. Since then he has been flying around pushing everything down so they don't fly off into space. I don't believe I'm writing this. I need a hobby.
i can make that happen , pay 10k in to my account i promise when you die he will be there doing your euology. i know Dicky, hes a good guy, he dont read yt comments though, i can tell him what you guys are saying. hes in his 60s live near me in new york ( i can get him to record something on tape in case he gone before you, which is likely if you in your 20s). hes an actor.
@ 12:53 "why do we live in a matter dominated universe?" We don't. Matter makes up 3-4% of our universe. Dark matter makes up 97%. We live in a dark matter dominated universe.
he meant in comparison with anti matter. not that matter its self dominates the universe. dark matter counts for 25% of the universe. 70% consists of dark energy
*Jason* __ Ok...you're right, this has fuck all to do with anti semitism......but the fact you even take the time to explain this juvenile 6th grade bullcrap "joke" .....seems pathetic......while we are here in awe of science trying to understand the core of our universe...........Unlike you "JasonJason" 🙄, it seems Mr. Rodstein turned out very well....
Here's a tip to people who are about to scroll down: relax. Close your eyes, and take a second to grab something you can squish, like a stress ball. You're probably going to need it. If you start to lose it, chant the phrase " cola and meal please, no bread". :)
When you see a painting do you know there's a painter? Or a building a builder? Why? Why couldn't paintings or buildings just appear out of nowhere? Yet you lean into believing that one day....nothing just decided to become something ...and wallah!....the universe??? I say that....not telling you about what religion....or ideas you should believe.....just some context....that's not even getting into the mathematical improbability of self replicating "life" arising from inert matter.
@@redriver6541 Could you define "absolute nothingness?" Why should there have been a nothing before something? God is something, so, where did God come from? Are saying that nothing just decided to become something... and wallah!.... an infinitely complex, hyper-intelligent universe-creator??? If the complexity of the Universe requires a creator, then an infinitely more complex creator must also require a creator. I hate to break it to you, but evolution is an inescapable fact of reality supported an insurmountable convergence of evidence from multiple, independent scientific fields. That so-called "mathematical improbability" claim of yours does not correlate with reality.
+paul skillman It's a good point to bring up. I have proposed an alternative view. I post the development of my model, The Big Drag, on my facebook timeline. Check it out. Heat, pressure and density have no meaning within the origin point. They emerged with the point's fractal bifurcation, which formed the multiverse manifold.
How about if there was just a universe of particals that eventually colested into masses that became so massive & compressed their centers started fussion.?
Especially when he does his Orson Welles impersonation. All he has to do is just talk normally. And then someone walks up to him and asks him what he wants to do tonight, and he replies "Same thing we do every night Pinky. Try to take over the world!"
The riddle of antimatter: "If the Big Bang created equal amounts of matter and antimatter, why didn't all of it annihilate together?" Well, what if the distribution of matter and antimatter in the universe is not uniform (each of the two forms clumping together, and only rarely coming in contact to annihilate)? And more important, what if we have already observed matter/antimatter annihilations on a cosmic scale? Gamma-ray bursts. Flashes of gamma rays associated with extremely energetic explosions. All of them were observed in distant galaxies, meaning that they happened a long time in the past. Most of them (the long bursts) are consistent with the model of a supernova or hypernova that collapses to form a neutron star, quark star, or black hole. And then, there are the short bursts. Well, what if the short bursts are caused by matter/antimatter annihilations? So, we would not see any matter/antimatter annihilation in our galaxy because it has already happened, billions of years ago, leaving only the residual matter to be seen. Other galaxies might have had an excess of antimatter instead of matter, so, when the annihilation took place, they only left the residual antimatter! And we might never know which galaxy is made of which substance, because a star made out of of antimatter would emit normal light, just like a star made out of matter!
Oh stfu about political correctness. Not everything has to be about politics, just enjoy the damn video instead of bringing your right wing bullshit here.
Perhaps just like virtual particles form into a matter and antimatter pair, the big bang "popped" into existence this way too. The two universes may have had opposite forms of energy, but equal, whatever that means, thus allowing everything from nothing. Expansion must have occurred soon enough to keep each universe separated from the other. Any mathematicians or physicists care to run with this?
It wouldn't be a positive gain for humanity if we were able to harness the energy of dark matter. The kind of weapons we could make our of that energy is unimaginable. But no one can stand I'm the way of progress hopefully we use it for the good. HA! Who am I kidding, we're fucked.
People have seen sufficient evidence of God, it's all around us but they have chosen to suppress the truth about God. My mental health is fine. Meanwhile, enjoy your life here on Earth. Once you're gone your time is up forever. God bless!
It's slightly more complicated than that. For once: you'd have to explain how they got all that antimatter. Black holes basicly form due to gravitational collapses of "ordinary" matter. So you'll always start out with a black hole made up of matter. To have them change to antimatter, you'd have to have a process that preferably feeds them antimatter. There is no known process for that since the universe is mainly made up of matter and you would have to specially produce antimatter to feed it. And then it would also not simply explode, but grow instead. The mass of an object is not only given by the mass of their constituents, but also ther energy. So if you dumped a chunk of matter into an antimatter black hole (or a chunk of antimatter into a matter black hole), they might anihilate with something inside the blackhole and produce a huge amount of energy. But since that energy cannot escape the black hole, it would simply get more massive ... In reality they can "shrink" due to Hawking radiation. That is: fluctuations near the even horizon of the black hole create pairs of particles. And these particles have some energy. Where did that energy come from? It's "borrowed" from the vacuum. And sometimes one of the particles flies off from the balck hole while the other falls into it. Since the energy has to be conserved, and there is some positive energy far away from the black hole produced (the escaped particle) and the black hole has swallowed some negative energy and "shrunken". It's a lot more complicated than that in reality, but that's the main point about it. I hope that helped a little ;)
***** Great comment! Thanks. 'you'd have to explain how they got all that antimatter' Could antimatter be created in the black hole, when hawking radiation rips space appart spewing the matter out as gamma rays, and keeping the antimatter in its core? Are black holes generally stable over time or slowly growing in mass? How does the 'borrowed' energy from vacuum return to its orignal state?
betadryl You're welcome :) Hawking radiation does not "rip space appart". It's actually as subtle as the heat radiation coming from an object slightly above room temperature in your room. It is also extremely low energetic. The perceived temperature of the radiation is inversely proportional to the mass of the black hole (the more massive it is, the "colder" the radiation). So the large black holes that are typically around in our galaxy actually absorb more radiation from the cosmological background than they emit from Hawking radiation. This means: even when these black holes do not absorb anything, they would grow extremely slowly. Hawking radiation generally only becomes important when either the black hole is very small (then it would emit really hot radiation) or when the universe becomes extremely old (so that the cosmic background is so extremely cold that even the largest black holes start to evaporate). But other than this really tiny effect: large black holes are very stable. Well yes, antimatter could be created in the black hole, but it wouldn't matter since you basicly notice only the gravity of the black hole as an outside observer (or, you would also notice if it was rotating or if it was charged, but let us keep it simple for now). The antimatter could also not escape the event horizon ... So it literally does not matter what is inside of the event horizon. Well, that's a good question. Generally the escaped particle will simply have positive energy while the other one has some negative energy. After falling though the event horizon of the black hole the particle with negative energy is forced towards the singularity in the center. On it's way there it will probably interact with some other particles (for instance photons) and pick up a lot of energy. The energy it picked up from the black hole is then basicly "paying" for the "energy debt" of the particle. If it hasn't interacted in the way to the singularity, it'll definately interact there and the same thing will happen. If you would like are more detailed explanation, there is basicly no way around doing some math ...
Its possible. If I'm not mistaken, it has a lot to do with virtual particles. If a virtual particle and its clone come into existence, they should immediately annihilate each other. But if they pop up near a black hole, one of the particles get captured by the black hole and as a result, the particles do not disappear out of existence. Because of this apparant violation of the conservation of energy, something has to pay to restore it, which comes from the energy of the black hole. This is where the concept of Hawking radiation comes from. A black hole will slowly evaporate as it captures more and more virtual particles that reduce its energy levels. This is my understanding, of course. I'm sure theres some stuff i said that isnt correct, so please let me know where i got my info wrong, so i can correct myself in the future.
point being, earth will not be in earths orbit then. with the distance growing and sun losing its mass the 3.8 cm/ year is a current number which will speed up in time, according to one calculation, earth will be around where jupiter is atm, another one predicts earth will be released from suns gravity by then, either way its not too promising for any life on earth.
Is it me? Has anyone noticed how similar the cosmic web/filaments are to the same type of structure as simulations of synaptic pathways in the brain? Is the universe one colossal brain and if so, is it conscious? If I had any money, that's where I'd place my bet.
Mohannad Abdelqader That verse talks about all animals LOL don't try to fool people. Koran says that sun sets in a pond at night. quran.com/18/86 Koran says sun moves to a stopping point - quran.com/36/38
*_It must be obvious by now, the expansion of what we call space, is proof that particles of positive and negative matter are being produced continuously, each one spinning at such speeds as to create an electrical force field... This force field is constantly pushing away particles from oppositely charged twin... As like particles clump together and grow bigger, they too behave the same way and occasionally collide with catastrophic results, but for the most part, are kept apart by magnet repulsion... Beyond that, like everyone else, I'm still formulating my understanding of the subject..._* 👀
"It starts from the point you began to draw/make it and ends when it connects back to that point" I'm not asking you about a circle "you've drawn" I'm asking you about the idea of a circle thats already drawn. Also 0 to 360 degrees denotes that something is turning on the same axis which isn't the case with a circle since you depart from the point you start and make a loop. Also by saying that something ends where it starts as you did, you're indirectly affirming
Thanks for posting this great video. One stands in awe against such greatness in our universe. We must pity those that confuse faith with the reality of nature. Faith is just that, faith. It can be compared to an empty dinner plate.
@@phoenix11994466 oh. I can be one alright. Im not believing something because "scientists" say its so. There are some smart people out. I do not disrespect that at all
@@davidrogers3253 *_Skepticism is a healthy response to new information, however, skeptics never grow or learn anything new, because they lack two of life’s essential gifts; ‘Curiosity’ and enthusiasm’._*
jim speiser It's offensive to me as a student of science when religious folk try to claim science as evidence for their beliefs, when it's quite obvious to reasonable people that science does not provide evidence for any religion whatsoever. Believe what you want, but call it what it is... Belief.
No it's because they want to preach their stone age religion. If I went on a religious video and posted comments about science I'd be told I'm going to burn in hell. Bible and Quran verses have no fucking place here.
In the early 80's there was a TV show called "in search of" hosted by Leonard Nemoy. It would have episodes about everything from the loch ness monster to mental telepathy. I remember they covered every possible example of psychic phenomenon there was. From dogs finding missing children and psychics reading palms to a mother sensing their son was in a accident a couple states away. The show was very popular. Also the very idea that we could communicate with each other from some biological mutat
read Hannes Alfven's world-antiworlds: an electrolysis-like process separates the particle pairs, and annihilation would happen in a thin film, not large volumes
Ha,ha! “The triumph of mind over matter. What is mind? No matter. What is matter? Never mind.” /”Carry on doctor” - the movie 1967/ Where is postulates, there is no science !
I watched THE BIGGEST BLACK HOLES just before this and I see a pattern. Supermassive black holes eject the material galaxies are made of .Are big bangs happening all over the cosmos? We are seeing the energy of black holes billions of years old,, time enough for suns, planets, and galaxies to form without our knowledge .Creation over and over and over
also if the universe is spherical couldn't the antimatter me on one hemisphere of the universe and matter on the other? and what if we are the antimatter and we are viewing negative as positive? and that antimatter is what we think we are? What if our spherical universe is side by side with an antimatter one? circling each other maybe? these are some other concepts I have! ;3 I would love to see some of your opinions!
We have observe a greater part of universe, its all matter. Most probably,we have observed the other sphere ( we can't say universe is sphere, there is no definite proof). Even if you right, the centre part of sphere would be empty, matter and antimatter will annihilate there. There is so such place in our observation.
give it up. you and these theoretical science guys can't even solve your neighborhood sewer problems. there's a name for it. worrying about the universe instead of your problems.
Perhaps because if we understand the building blocks of the Universe, we can accomplish things that will solve all of those ills (and more) in ways we can't even imagine right now. The ability to re-order matter and traverse vast distances in short periods are hallmarks of science-fiction and among those accomplishments which make up the "holy grail" of real science, because such capabilities would remove the need for most human conflict/greed/etc.
You both underestimate the current level of technology, and it wouldn't change within months or even decades. As it stands, it costs somewhere around half a trillion USD in terms of power requirements, materials, and man-hours to produce even a few fleeting anti-particles, which is why antimatter is technically the single most valuable material in existence. Smart money would be on sustained fusion first; antimatter is a probable byproduct of that since it is found in the solar wind.
Theories still need to be proven in order to enter the realm of fact, however. Though they are a step above a hypothesis, which is colloquially referred to as an "educated guess". Theories merely have evidence and circumstances to support them - to borrow from mathematics, consider that a fully-solved equation is referred to as a "proof". Theories are not up to that level; they are merely the "most likely" explanation for phenomena according to our current level of understanding.
Gravity and anti-gravity are forces that are BOUND to matter and anti-matter. Therefore they DO travel with them. For example Earth's gravity travels with the Earth in its orbit. My (totally amateur) opinion is that matter and anti-matter separated during the "big bang" because anti-matter and the anti-gravity bound to it traveled more quickly than the matter and gravity. If that was not the case then they would have annihilated each other.
'Firmilab discovered quanta switching 3 trillion times per second from matter to antimatter. Experiments show conversion of matter into energy through its antimatter brings about gamma rays with exact opposite momentum. Sinusoidal spherical standing wave fronts of periodic or harmonic motion must propagate non linearly at central region producing two multiplying+/-dividing coupling resonances. We then observe expanding ripples now dividing from its source calling this process of change 'charge.'
Go and dig it all out, if the human race does not do it, who will? We are the appointed ones. Respect creation and give glory to the creator. The splendour displayed is an invitation for the discovery. The motivative hunger is the ultimate longing of restoration and getting to know how deep His agape love is.
Hey guys and gals. Guess what. Absolutely nothing can exist without the opposite also existing. I call this the unwritten law of opposites. It's really not that hard to understand. If you really think about it, anything you can think of physically or spiritually, the opposite has to exist with all variations and degrees in between. Its simply commonsense. Examples: Good/Bad, tall/short, positive/negative, visable/invisable, existence/non-existance. You could go on forever. That includes different multiple dimensions and maybe even dimensions within dimensions. So where do you put a limit on anything?
In some ways, it is. The graviton is still a theoretical elementary particle. Which is odd. I'd have almost expected the neutrino to be proven to exist and observed AFTER the graviton by virtue of it being a ghost particle and the graviton being the conductor of the strong force.
It's all about 0s and 1s, + and -, isn't it? Repel and attract. Evade and encumber. I loved hearing that in the very beginning after the mega-bang, that such a small percentage (1%?) formed into matter that became the Universe. In all things in life, it's the energy we put into things that shows us what matters. I love how no matter how deeply you go, how minute them particle, everything is the same. For example, look at our solar system, from a great distance, it looks like an atom. You have universes within you. Our Universe is within Universes within other Universes.
So anti matter is an exactly identical mirror image of physical matter....sounds like an intangible world....this is true very true...God is playing with our minds...there is another world out there humans can't grasp...find God, find reason... Slow minds
Mystery in mysteries, Histories in History. Here be a riddle that comes not from man For years or days or hours or seconds Are but shard grains of sand. No secret i keep But one i cant tell Could be the difference 'Tween Heaven and Hell. He who has ears Those who have eyes Will be so astonished At The Glory Suprised. Turn not your back From the Beginning of time. Nor from the start, Or the end of this rhyme.
What’s all this about Auntie matter? My Auntie Ada and my Auntie Margaret both matter. They make wonderful pies in square pans, and they are delicious, especially my Auntie Ada’s raspberry pi. Ada and Margaret don’t always get along and when they fight Margaret says that Auntie Ada’s opinions don’t matter. If that’s not what you mean by 🍣Auntie matter, then never mind. - Emily
It's all mind over matter. I don't mind,so it doesn't matter.
Smartest comment I have read so far. It makes sense if you dont't think about it.
+Rey sosa lol!
+Rey sosa like he said, it doesnt matter.
EvilNeon I...don't disagree?
Rey sosa I counter your logic by substituting my own. :D
his name is SAM TING? or was his name the same as the man before him?
Damn that was interesting. Awesome!
Answer: space can and does move faster than light, otherwise the Universe could not have expanded so quickly into so large a space. It's the same reason why a "warp drive" is theoretically possible.
Could someone answer a question for me? If only one particle in a billion survived in the beginning, how did so few particles create everything? I'm no troll, or religious nut, I'm simply curious. Help me to understand. I was taught that matter cannot be created or destroyed, as a part of Newtons laws. So, wouldent matter have to have always existed?
It's slighty complicated. If you like, I'll try to explain.
Newton's laws are only a good model for reality in the case of everyday length-, energy- and timescales. They also don't say anything specifically about the destruction of particles. Generally, the conservation of energy is valid. And if you have only low energy processes, mass is approximately conserved.
If you want to look at the cosmos at all scales you'll find that the world is a lot better described by quantum field theory. Quantum field theory is basicly the marriage of quantum mechanics with special relativity.
In quantum field theory you can have processes (they are also observed) of an electron and a positron annihilating and creating 2 photons as a result. Or you can have pairproduction of matter-antimatter pairs of particles from highly energetic photons. There are also many other processes that can destroy or create particles ...
So in a simple picture: if you start with a universe that is just filled with a lot of energy, you'll have highly energetic photons (and other particles) that will decay into pairs of matter and anti-matter particles. And matter and antimatter particles will anihilate into high energy photons (and other particles) again. If you have the universe expanding, the photon energy will start to decease. That is: while they fly around, the space gets "streched" and the photons with it. So they end up having longer and longer wavelengths. At some point the energy of the photons is so low, that they cannot produce any more matter-antimatter pairs. So the production of matter and antimatter stops.
You are then left with whatever matter and anti-matter the photons produced before that and that hasn't annihilated yet. But annihilation between matter and antimatter can still take place. So they annihilate ;)
And everytime a matter particle meets it's corresponding anti-particle, they annihilate, producing photons until they do no longer meet anymore.
Now, one of the interesting things about the universe is: there is a tiny asymmetry between matter and antimatter. The laws of physics slightly favour the production of matter over anti-matter (it's so extremely tiny that even measuring this effect is very hard). So after the energy of the photons dropped below the threshold for the production of matter-antimatter particle pairs, there was a tiny excess of matter. And when all the anti-matter had anihilated with matter, there was still matter left.
Now how come we are surrounded by so many particles? Well there are a few things. For once: after the universe was "cooled down" enough so that the left over matter particles were not bombarded with very energetic photons, they could start to accumulate. So you would end up with concentrations of matter here and there. And from one of those accumulations of matter our galaxy eventually formed and all the stars with it.
So you see: most of space is empty. The reasion why you see so much stuff around you is because you are in one of the few places where there actually is a lot of stuff. The space between galaxies is empty. The space between stars is also very empty (even the incredibly beautiful nebulas you sometimes see on pictures have so low densities that you wouldn't even notice them if you flew through one ...
And then there is the other aspect: there simply is a large amount of matter. Eventhough only such a tiny fraction of matter "survived" the annihilation with antimatter in the early universe, there was just an enormous amount of it before that (there is direct evidence for that).
All of that is a lot more complicated in reality, of course. But I still hope this massive simplification helped you a little bit ;)
It kinda did. So, what your saying is that after the big bang, and the annihilation process, what matter had survived eventually congregated into "pools" and began to form the celestial bodies we see today? This implies that billions, if not trillions and trillions of matter-antimatter reactions took place, to be able to provide enough matter to create so many planets, starts, and so-forth. Am I correct in that assumption or have I fallen of the map again. XD
TanoSithLord
Yes, you are correct :)
One has to keep in mind that the universe was incredibly dense in its early stage, so that particles could hardly move without bumping into other particles ...
Yano : When the alleged Big Bang happened , time and space expanded like a balloon and was packed full ,but as matter condensed and made planets , time and space continued to expand there is only so much matter but space/ time continue to expand creating the space between galaxy's .
***** Any explanation for why matter accumulated into chunks and isn't spread evenly throughout the universe? Obviously gravity is a culprit, but why did it favour certain directions over others? Why didn't all the matter just accumulate into a giant chunk (one badass black hole)? It's something to do with quantum fluctuations and the cosmic background radiation, correct?
I explore the universe with the finest instrument known to man, fueled by DMT ;-)
joe rogan approves
How does antimatter respond to gravity? I read somewhere that we still don't know whether it attracts or repels other (anti)matter. Have trapped anti-atoms been subjected to tests of some kind?
That makes sense. Since the EM field and all others we know are stronger than gravity, the use of these fields to contain antimatter would make it extremely difficult to observe a gravitational effect. If the temperature of the antimatter is low enough and the trapping field could be turned off briefly, perhaps then the antimatter trajectory could be observed. Sounds pretty dodgy. Maybe cosmological observations, in which gravity rules, could answer the question?
While the consensus among physicists is that gravity will attract both matter and antimatter at the same rate that matter attracts matter, there is a strong desire to confirm this experimentally. Unknown at this point in time.
If there are matter realm and anti-matter realm, they couldn't be in the same universe. I believe that our universe in the Matter Universe and there is Anti-matter Universe is in different dimension which have everything that behave exactly the same as every matter in this universe.... i don't even understand what i was writing about....
Why does anything have had to have happened to anti matter at the beginning of time? It's a big universe. Can't it be that some of it just got blown so far away that it now sits off in some out of reach corner making it's own kind of the universe?
Also it seems maybe matter was stronger than antimatter. It's a simple answer but since they destroy each other (or seem to at least) the stronger one lives. Then again what if matter is actually antimatter and vice versa? Can we really consider antimatter to be what causes destruction, or maybe it's the power matter has when it comes into contact with antimatter. Not sure if what I'm saying even makes any sense lol. I have a lot of researching to do
So if a black hole has so much gravity that even light can't escape it....how could the big bang escape itself....since it would have so much more gravity than anyone could imagine...
What's the deal with those TruthContest comments? I see them on every single video that I click on. Do people actually buy into this shit?
+Alan Jay I wonder that too. Has kind of a scam/multi-level-marketing feel to it, with all the spam. Most of the comments are definitely bots - there's almost always a second comment saying "thanks for this" or something like that.
Big West Yeah, you can tell the comments are made by bots. It's always the EXACT same comment, letter for letter. I think it's a scam.
Alan Jay I agree, it's a weirdass scam though.
+Alan Jay it IS a scam.
+Alan Jay Of course a dumb-ass will buy into anything. I am pitching a game show in Hollywood right now that has people eating their own shit for cash, called "Bottoms Up"!! I dare them and then the dumb-asses risk possible death and certain illness to eat their own shit as I offer increasing amounts of money until they munch out!! Dumb-asses Unite!!!!!! All hail the Dumb-asses!!!!!!!!!!
I don’t know what it is about his voice for god sakes.... relaxing somehow
i want a playlist of all his documentaries VO'd to sleep to.
Deep voice speaking slightly slow = 😴
Similar to Orson Welles !
He has a name.. it's DICK RODSTIEN
The commercial interruptions during these videos are getting ridiculous.
Have you not got adblock? I didn't have any commercial interruptions.
cry me a river
I'll see what I can find. Sometimes it attempts to interrupt for a commercial, but then freezes the video so I can't watch the whole thing.
Laughs in youtube premium. 😂
Give us more documentaries like this!!
the music in this video is very dissonant, borderline atonal. i like it. very trippy
Watched this high on marijuana 🍁 and shrooms 🍄and makes my mind blown away🤯✨🎆
do not muck about with antimatter indoors. always experiment in the open, your garden or in the road for example. wear gloves and goggles and an outdoors coat. shout "antimatter" to give people some warning proceed with confidence.
Also, be sure to have a water hose handy
Or if you're British,,, An hosepipe. :)
william Greene .... 🙄🙄🙄🙄🙄🙄
And if you,re Cajun, some hot sauce. It might be good to eat.
well maybe don't experiment with antimatter "in the road"!? explains the huge potholes this winter...
At the end of this video, the question is asked "Just what is it that could break symmetry, hence trigger creation?" [paraphrased]
To my mind, the much more intriguing question would be "just what type of field, or force, or event exists, or existed, that could bring into a physical realm, or appropriate vibrational/frequency state, a perfectly symmetrical ism/ion?" To me, this is, by orders of magnitude, a fantastically more difficult realization/state of matter/reality to create. Where there are an infinite number of ways to break symmetry, how many ways are there to create perfect symmetry? Zero? (not homo sapiens to create it...just anything, anyone, whatever)
One of the most interesting vids about dark matter I have seen in the last 10 years hands down😌👏👏👌👌
I'm beginning to see the gravity of this situation...
Indeed... it's quite heavy stuff, as a matter of fact. c".)
n NH
Consequently the super-massive gravity of the situation can lead to the formation of a black hole.. tsk-tsk
Ba dum tiss
Nice
My Theory is that at the moment of creation, anti-matter moved backwards in time.
Interesting 🧐🤔 can you explain it more?
what pseudoscientific bollox ... i had to stop at the " antimatter plume" at the galactic center.... its been perfectly explained by the electric universe , its plasma.
Wait wait wait, a good science video on youtube that is in 1080p whow! Extraordinary!
...true! ...:D :D :)
TwippyTwilight I just switched mine over to 240p Its better that way.
Welcome to the world of SpaceRip.
Action movies
Spacerip makes very high quality videos.. I love this channel
Pretty deep stuff !
this topic is complex enough for lay people without careless editing :
17.58 complete nonsense "the electric field separates the electrons from positrons".. there are no electrons
the e-field separates anti-protons and positrons
18.20 "then the molecule".. anti-hydrogen is an anti-atom not even an anti-molecule (which would be anti-H2)
20:00 the oddball molecule on the screen appears to be an anti-proton orbiting an alpha particle (He2+ nucleus) this is not explained at all
i want to be a space scientist and study astronomy when i grow up...!!!
What happend?
RIP.
Seriously, how you doing 5 years later?
Me too! I'm 33 years old...
He has ascended and no longer communicates in our primitive ways.
I want to know how the universe had a born on date?? What would have been there for it to be born into? Something was always there that has no beginning and no possible end. What would be there after? Always was always will be. Can not talk about "the big bang" without talking about how it even became to be or what was there before it.. Also it is "still growing", well into what!? And the bigger question what is it growing into? Space has been there forever literally and always will be there with no end! They keep talking about the universe beginning , it can not begin because what would be there before it "began" . What would be past "the end" ? It is impossible for a human brain or ANY artificial intelligence to ever understand. Everything is energy and that energy has always been in the universe and always will be. Cant make anything without it having been something else first . I challenge you to try to figure it out! It can not be explained!
It can be explained. instead of the Big Bang Theory, check out Clif High's Explaination called the Little Blip Theory for the creation of Matter.
Just like TH-cam hasn't existed forever, similarly the universe had to be created out of something at some point in time.
Actually, we are living in an anti-matter universe where all matter seems missing.
where is Morgan Freeman
maybe at antimatter dimension
Lol
Indie Gozal lol
Mason Gratias lol
In Antarctica, riding a penguin.
What happened to the energy from those early matter\antimatter reactions?
2 Soldiers from ex'iopia!nnandone seaukusaeii arehere÷467uiopl)_y].?
.?
_ _ _mor%4890].
[._)+!._._%%%+ _ _ _
_ _
_ |
If matter forms mass, could it go to reason that anti matter cannot form mass? Instead perpetually forcing apart? And if this be the case, and the fact that more anti matter is produced each day throughout the universe is considered, could it case the universe as we know it to expand faster and faster each day as we see?
This is what I want, I like to hear people's random theories.. Scientists only research what they're funded to and I think it's a huge waste.
my thought is similar to you.If matter can form mass(gravity as property) than antimatter can form antimass(antigravity as property), but due to very initial property of antigravity they cannot concentrete but tend to disperse. they should be distributed in entire space prabably 1unit/cubic meter or km or similar and it will not easy to detect.I have video regarding this on youtube
DonatoThomas
you have not a clue.
black hole cores are gravity made things that hold the exact potential to make space time exactly as we have it... to not go to black hole cores for the big bang is to say GOD DID IT...choose! Antimatter and matter make PURE ENERGY and the whole Universe space time you know is the LEFT OVERS not the antimatter or the matter but what was left over in matter... and things that come out of black hole cores become HYDROGEN and HYDROGEN made this Universe space time you know... no one can prove me wrong on this planet...do not try! it is ether a magical wave or 2 spheres... choose stupidity of waves or God did it or 2 black hole cores hit and one of them was made of antimatter...just happens to fit 100% correct to all events from the big bang to this day... so it has to be wrong???? grow up people!
NO you can't think anti matter is reversed in function IT IS NOT! All matter and anti matter act ALMOST exactly the same... a table in antimatter is exactly the same as one in matter but would explode in the AIR just touching atoms in the matter air...the composition of anti matter is simple positive and negative reversal of positions... on contact with the opposed on it turns each into energy instantly... they decompose to basic part of energy... then no one is really sure...since nothing is lost in Universe...what kind of energies were produced is now interesting to humans...light to heavy atoms are desired to be tested. For You to be asking me the question say you did not go look any of it up to learn it and know it for the rest of your life...why no just go learn how it works from the experts and pictures and all. Worth the effort!
NO, youir choices are God did from NOTHING or something made the things that made the big bang happen... and them things had to exist before the BIG BANG... so them things had to be spheres. Only by colliding 2 spheres can we make an event of such scale. the largest explosion since the big bang was 2 black hole core (or cold) stars hit together. it is them a simple conclusion that what they claim produced magical WAVES to make a big bang (hot dense state)...what was hot and what was dense? ENERGY moving faster than light speed by a factor of 80,000 times faster or more! Well nothing can do that BUT crushed by gravity atoms and crushed by gravity ANTI atoms.....well that is whol different story that can produce conditions to brake gravity 100% and for a short time spring all them atoms from crushed to free to expand..all at the same time! All matter and antimatter then changed to energy pure in waves and then cooled and slowed and spin and cycle to make stars and start the whole thing over....who knows? A universe might exist today on the other side that is antimatter and it makes stuff that gets loose and we make stuff that gets loose...one day might hit together and make another Universe like our OR like theirs. Ether way where did the hot dense state come from for the theory of the Big bang... what made them waves exist? What made them sub atomic exist? What made it so heat can happen or even density from waves (waves move at the speed of light in general...they can't be dense or hot..or is a ATOM state not subatomic)
"Inward spherical wave fronts multiplying time dilation at right+angles compressing+4-0-4+-decompressing expanding sphere's now dividing gravity at right-angles."
Everybody knows that Flying Spaggeti Monster created Multi-verse and all Dimensions.
Why do people even argue against the most obvious thing ?
Rofl best answer ever.
Ajay Kumar Singh No, the Flying Spaghetti monster did not create the multi-verses and other dimensions. He has been too busy pushing us down with his noodley appendages to keep us on Earth.
This can not be an easy job.
Frank Allen
Almost 14 billion years ago Chuck Norris made Spaghetti, then it got lose and Made Multiverse.
Today it's known as our God.
THE FLYING SPAGHETTI MONSTER !
No, the Flying Spaghetti Monster Escaped while Chuck Norris was checking his mail. You see, the pot he was boiling the noodles in overheated (no safety valves back then) and blew up causing the big bang. That's how the Spaghetti Monster escaped. Since then he has been flying around pushing everything down so they don't fly off into space.
I don't believe I'm writing this.
I need a hobby.
Frank Allen
You already have one.
Making fun with keyboard warriors.
I want this narrator to do my eulogy.
Is it possible to get the narrators name?
Dick Rodstein. It says so in the closing credits.
i can make that happen , pay 10k in to my account i promise when you die he will be there doing your euology. i know Dicky, hes a good guy, he dont read yt comments though, i can tell him what you guys are saying. hes in his 60s live near me in new york ( i can get him to record something on tape in case he gone before you, which is likely if you in your 20s). hes an actor.
Sounds a lot like James Cromwell, but it ain't.
I don't want a eulogy.
@ 12:53 "why do we live in a matter dominated universe?"
We don't. Matter makes up 3-4% of our universe. Dark matter makes up 97%. We live in a dark matter dominated universe.
he meant in comparison with anti matter. not that matter its self dominates the universe. dark matter counts for 25% of the universe. 70% consists of dark energy
Dick Rodstein... Such an unfortunate name to attend a public high-school with.
Bob Jones more unfortunate than Bob Jones?
***** His name is Dick Rod... stein
And this ain't my name. Lol
+Bob Jones No kidding. But what a voice. He and Jay O. Sanders are my favorite narrators.
+Bob Jones scrolled to long looking for this comment!
*Jason* __ Ok...you're right, this has fuck all to do with anti semitism......but the fact you even take the time to explain this juvenile 6th grade bullcrap "joke" .....seems pathetic......while we are here in awe of science trying to understand the core of our universe...........Unlike you "JasonJason" 🙄, it seems Mr. Rodstein turned out very well....
does any of this really matter........huehuehuehue
Anti-matter can have reverse effects of gravity? Hm, maybe it has something to do with Dark Energy, and matter as well.
Here's a tip to people who are about to scroll down: relax. Close your eyes, and take a second to grab something you can squish, like a stress ball. You're probably going to need it.
If you start to lose it, chant the phrase " cola and meal please, no bread".
:)
"There's holes in all of them, they aren't any more sensible than believing in God"
Really? At least these theories have evidence supporting them.
When you see a painting do you know there's a painter? Or a building a builder? Why? Why couldn't paintings or buildings just appear out of nowhere? Yet you lean into believing that one day....nothing just decided to become something ...and wallah!....the universe???
I say that....not telling you about what religion....or ideas you should believe.....just some context....that's not even getting into the mathematical improbability of self replicating "life" arising from inert matter.
@@redriver6541
Could you define "absolute nothingness?"
Why should there have been a nothing before something?
God is something, so, where did God come from? Are saying that nothing just decided to become something... and wallah!.... an infinitely complex, hyper-intelligent universe-creator???
If the complexity of the Universe requires a creator, then an infinitely more complex creator must also require a creator.
I hate to break it to you, but evolution is an inescapable fact of reality supported an insurmountable convergence of evidence from multiple, independent scientific fields. That so-called "mathematical improbability" claim of yours does not correlate with reality.
@@ominous-omnipresent-they give this a watch guy. I'm not typing all this out.
th-cam.com/video/noj4phMT9OE/w-d-xo.html
This video was uploaded on my birthday
What do you think now that you've been working on this for 6 years?
@Scribble Scrable That was 7 years ago. I was very young back then, and anti-matter was really and still is, fascinating to me.
If there's antimatter then there's is anti-human life...described as Politicians.
'"The universe began hot" Where did the heat come from?
+paul skillman we don't explain anything with the big bang, we just know it happen.... now we need to find why
+paul skillman It's a good point to bring up. I have proposed an alternative view. I post the development of my model, The Big Drag, on my facebook timeline. Check it out. Heat, pressure and density have no meaning within the origin point. They emerged with the point's fractal bifurcation, which formed the multiverse manifold.
How about if there was just a universe of particals that eventually colested into masses that became so massive & compressed their centers started fussion.?
where did the universe come from?
+paul skillman That would make it too easy to understand ;)
This narrator must be great at parties.
Especially when he does his Orson Welles impersonation. All he has to do is just talk normally. And then someone walks up to him and asks him what he wants to do tonight, and he replies "Same thing we do every night Pinky. Try to take over the world!"
somebody knows his name?
How sensitive the interior walls of the detectors must be to pick up the presence of subatomic particles from a few atoms
I'd love to see 100 grams of electrons and positrons annihilate each other, from a distance of course.... lol🤣🤣
At what distance would you feel safe, Chris?
@Greg Moonen as far away as i was when they actually ignited it....and not merely far away in distance (space), but in time, as well....
@Greg Moonen that being said, 100 grams of antimatter, as posited by mr zimmerman, has orders of magnitude more explosive power than the tsar bomb
@Greg Moonen 1/1,000,000,000 (one billionth) of a gram of positrons contains the explosive power of 80 pounds/38 kilograms of TNT
@Greg Moonen i did not say you were...in fact, in your original post, you drew no correlation between the tsar bomb and 100 grams of antimatter
The riddle of antimatter: "If the Big Bang created equal amounts of matter and antimatter, why didn't all of it annihilate together?"
Well, what if the distribution of matter and antimatter in the universe is not uniform (each of the two forms clumping together, and only rarely coming in contact to annihilate)? And more important, what if we have already observed matter/antimatter annihilations on a cosmic scale?
Gamma-ray bursts. Flashes of gamma rays associated with extremely energetic explosions. All of them were observed in distant galaxies, meaning that they happened a long time in the past. Most of them (the long bursts) are consistent with the model of a supernova or hypernova that collapses to form a neutron star, quark star, or black hole.
And then, there are the short bursts. Well, what if the short bursts are caused by matter/antimatter annihilations? So, we would not see any matter/antimatter annihilation in our galaxy because it has already happened, billions of years ago, leaving only the residual matter to be seen. Other galaxies might have had an excess of antimatter instead of matter, so, when the annihilation took place, they only left the residual antimatter! And we might never know which galaxy is made of which substance, because a star made out of of antimatter would emit normal light, just like a star made out of matter!
🤯
I love how these excellent videos always talk about "we" when most people don't know the names of the planets? Got to love this "inclusive PC" BS!
Oh stfu about political correctness. Not everything has to be about politics, just enjoy the damn video instead of bringing your right wing bullshit here.
Dirac's original gut feeling was correct, he suspected that the electron might be the anti proton. Now I can prove he was right.
atoms dont want to be contained, hence its impossible to reach absolute zero; total absence of entropy.
And if life is everywhere, even in a drop of water. Everything can happen!!!
try to study the laws of reactions and attractions of forces and energy. so you will know the true nature of creations law by emologist R.T.S
Could it be that the antimatter went into another universe during these annihilations?
The probability is almost negligible. Because then you can not say that every point in universe is the centre of universe. Check the image at 12:39.
Perhaps just like virtual particles form into a matter and antimatter pair, the big bang "popped" into existence this way too. The two universes may have had opposite forms of energy, but equal, whatever that means, thus allowing everything from nothing. Expansion must have occurred soon enough to keep each universe separated from the other. Any mathematicians or physicists care to run with this?
so many dumb comments on here.
It wouldn't be a positive gain for humanity if we were able to harness the energy of dark matter. The kind of weapons we could make our of that energy is unimaginable. But no one can stand I'm the way of progress hopefully we use it for the good. HA! Who am I kidding, we're fucked.
+First Name Last Name i'm hoping for space travel.
Sounds like science fiction... You could believe in this crap without doubt and can't even comprehend the existence of a God? Lol
WE HAVE CREATED ANTIMATTER GAY ASS FUCK WHILE THERE IS NO EVIDENCE OF GOD SO STFU
+jim speiser Yes we have...
+jim speiser except we have created it in the large hadron collider and other particle accelerators
+jim speiser We actually did create it, we didn't find antimatter, but it was created via the Large Hadron Collider
People have seen sufficient evidence of God, it's all around us but they have chosen to suppress the truth about God. My mental health is fine. Meanwhile, enjoy your life here on Earth. Once you're gone your time is up forever. God bless!
Could black holes consist of antimatter? Spewing out matter until a collapse at some point happens, resulting in a massive chain reaction / explosion.
It's slightly more complicated than that.
For once: you'd have to explain how they got all that antimatter. Black holes basicly form due to gravitational collapses of "ordinary" matter. So you'll always start out with a black hole made up of matter.
To have them change to antimatter, you'd have to have a process that preferably feeds them antimatter. There is no known process for that since the universe is mainly made up of matter and you would have to specially produce antimatter to feed it. And then it would also not simply explode, but grow instead. The mass of an object is not only given by the mass of their constituents, but also ther energy. So if you dumped a chunk of matter into an antimatter black hole (or a chunk of antimatter into a matter black hole), they might anihilate with something inside the blackhole and produce a huge amount of energy. But since that energy cannot escape the black hole, it would simply get more massive ...
In reality they can "shrink" due to Hawking radiation. That is: fluctuations near the even horizon of the black hole create pairs of particles. And these particles have some energy. Where did that energy come from? It's "borrowed" from the vacuum. And sometimes one of the particles flies off from the balck hole while the other falls into it. Since the energy has to be conserved, and there is some positive energy far away from the black hole produced (the escaped particle) and the black hole has swallowed some negative energy and "shrunken". It's a lot more complicated than that in reality, but that's the main point about it.
I hope that helped a little ;)
***** Great comment! Thanks. 'you'd have to explain how they got all that antimatter' Could antimatter be created in the black hole, when hawking radiation rips space appart spewing the matter out as gamma rays, and keeping the antimatter in its core? Are black holes generally stable over time or slowly growing in mass? How does the 'borrowed' energy from vacuum return to its orignal state?
betadryl
You're welcome :)
Hawking radiation does not "rip space appart". It's actually as subtle as the heat radiation coming from an object slightly above room temperature in your room. It is also extremely low energetic. The perceived temperature of the radiation is inversely proportional to the mass of the black hole (the more massive it is, the "colder" the radiation). So the large black holes that are typically around in our galaxy actually absorb more radiation from the cosmological background than they emit from Hawking radiation. This means: even when these black holes do not absorb anything, they would grow extremely slowly. Hawking radiation generally only becomes important when either the black hole is very small (then it would emit really hot radiation) or when the universe becomes extremely old (so that the cosmic background is so extremely cold that even the largest black holes start to evaporate).
But other than this really tiny effect: large black holes are very stable.
Well yes, antimatter could be created in the black hole, but it wouldn't matter since you basicly notice only the gravity of the black hole as an outside observer (or, you would also notice if it was rotating or if it was charged, but let us keep it simple for now). The antimatter could also not escape the event horizon ...
So it literally does not matter what is inside of the event horizon.
Well, that's a good question. Generally the escaped particle will simply have positive energy while the other one has some negative energy. After falling though the event horizon of the black hole the particle with negative energy is forced towards the singularity in the center. On it's way there it will probably interact with some other particles (for instance photons) and pick up a lot of energy. The energy it picked up from the black hole is then basicly "paying" for the "energy debt" of the particle. If it hasn't interacted in the way to the singularity, it'll definately interact there and the same thing will happen.
If you would like are more detailed explanation, there is basicly no way around doing some math ...
Its possible. If I'm not mistaken, it has a lot to do with virtual particles. If a virtual particle and its clone come into existence, they should immediately annihilate each other. But if they pop up near a black hole, one of the particles get captured by the black hole and as a result, the particles do not disappear out of existence. Because of this apparant violation of the conservation of energy, something has to pay to restore it, which comes from the energy of the black hole. This is where the concept of Hawking radiation comes from. A black hole will slowly evaporate as it captures more and more virtual particles that reduce its energy levels.
This is my understanding, of course. I'm sure theres some stuff i said that isnt correct, so please let me know where i got my info wrong, so i can correct myself in the future.
Teddy Catnip
Read my post from the 23rd ... or the wikipedia article on it ;)
point being, earth will not be in earths orbit then. with the distance growing and sun losing its mass the 3.8 cm/ year is a current number which will speed up in time, according to one calculation, earth will be around where jupiter is atm, another one predicts earth will be released from suns gravity by then, either way its not too promising for any life on earth.
Science is the mother of all religion
Jay Singh Wisdom! Then you may understand this too: "God created us and we created God."
Yes absolutely :)
Jay Singh Science isn't a religion.
thetruepure2 But it's a believe system very similar to religion. Upon that it always has been used to influence public opinion.
***** It is NOT a belief system.
Science is a tool that we use to discern truths about the world we live in.
sorry , but dark energy has the largest percentage. not dark matter
Is it me? Has anyone noticed how similar the cosmic web/filaments are to the same type of structure as simulations of synaptic pathways in the brain? Is the universe one colossal brain and if so, is it conscious? If I had any money, that's where I'd place my bet.
yep, its just you.
What if there was already a anti-matter galaxy, and we can see it but don't realize it cause we don't know what an anti-matter galaxy looks like? :o
It would look exactly the same.
“And of everything we created a pair, that perhaps you may remember.” (Qur'an 51:49)
"I am calling bullshit on this one!" (Yo momma 69:666)
Mohannad Abdelqader That verse talks about all animals LOL don't try to fool people. Koran says that sun sets in a pond at night. quran.com/18/86
Koran says sun moves to a stopping point - quran.com/36/38
This is a bad joke but im going to say it
(I guess the universe "matters" to us)
The video is good. The SPAM is bad.
*_It must be obvious by now, the expansion of what we call space, is proof that particles of positive and negative matter are being produced continuously, each one spinning at such speeds as to create an electrical force field... This force field is constantly pushing away particles from oppositely charged twin... As like particles clump together and grow bigger, they too behave the same way and occasionally collide with catastrophic results, but for the most part, are kept apart by magnet repulsion... Beyond that, like everyone else, I'm still formulating my understanding of the subject..._* 👀
Turn the music down; it's too LOUD.
Other than that, great video, as are all the Space Rip videos.
I don't see what purpose the music serves
To get High with....Ganja Bro!
"It starts from the point you began to draw/make it and ends when it connects back to that point" I'm not asking you about a circle "you've drawn" I'm asking you about the idea of a circle thats already drawn. Also 0 to 360 degrees denotes that something is turning on the same axis which isn't the case with a circle since you depart from the point you start and make a loop. Also by saying that something ends where it starts as you did, you're indirectly affirming
Thanks for posting this great video. One stands in awe against such greatness in our universe. We must pity those that confuse faith with the reality of nature. Faith is just that, faith. It can be compared to an empty dinner plate.
These clowns cant say what did or didmt happen during those first seconds of annihilation . They're guessing at best
*_Correct, just like I'm guessing right now, that YOU may be the bigger clown..._* 😃😜
@@phoenix11994466 oh. I can be one alright. Im not believing something because "scientists" say its so. There are some smart people out. I do not disrespect that at all
@@davidrogers3253
*_Skepticism is a healthy response to new information, however, skeptics never grow or learn anything new, because they lack two of life’s essential gifts; ‘Curiosity’ and enthusiasm’._*
Well I'm guessing it wasn't an old white dude in a robe that said poof and it just appeared. 😂
@@phoenix11994466 Agreed . . I do like those characteristics. I wish I had those earlier in life myself. At least 2 decades ago.
QURAN SURAH 51 VERSE 49 : And of all things We created two mates; perhaps you will remember.
Why are you here?
jim speiser It's offensive to me as a student of science when religious folk try to claim science as evidence for their beliefs, when it's quite obvious to reasonable people that science does not provide evidence for any religion whatsoever. Believe what you want, but call it what it is... Belief.
No it's because they want to preach their stone age religion. If I went on a religious video and posted comments about science I'd be told I'm going to burn in hell. Bible and Quran verses have no fucking place here.
In the early 80's there was a TV show called "in search of" hosted by Leonard Nemoy. It would have episodes about everything from the loch ness monster to mental telepathy. I remember they covered every possible example of psychic phenomenon there was. From dogs finding missing children and psychics reading palms to a mother sensing their son was in a accident a couple states away. The show was very popular. Also the very idea that we could communicate with each other from some biological mutat
MAH Y E K R U Toiupl)o_
read Hannes Alfven's world-antiworlds: an electrolysis-like process separates the particle pairs, and annihilation would happen in a thin film, not large volumes
old, old, old, bla, bla , bla
Who's this narrator???
Ha,ha!
“The triumph of mind over matter.
What is mind? No matter.
What is matter? Never mind.”
/”Carry on doctor” - the movie 1967/
Where is postulates, there is no science !
That's. It. Find. What. Makes. Antimatter. & There. You. Are. The. Fuel. To. Send. Us. Out. Through. Space faster. Than. The. Speed. Of. Light. But. How. Do. You. Stop. It. Travelling. That. Fast
Beautiful description :-)
If man is trying to play God, then who's trying to play Satan???
man
Leighton Scheer Absolutely
Anti-man
@@FlavioGaming that was my answer too. Damn!!!!
en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Turbulence#Kolmogorov's_theory_of_1941
cheating for a kirev, but not a dyslexic library unbuildeer.
6pahel.
I've notice the "Skip Ad" button is being phazed out.
I watched THE BIGGEST BLACK HOLES just before this and I see a pattern. Supermassive black holes eject the material galaxies are made of .Are big bangs happening all over the cosmos? We are seeing the energy of black holes billions of years old,, time enough for suns, planets, and galaxies to form without our knowledge .Creation over and over and over
They want to create something takes years 1 million to create space exist however in high intensities gas and is easy to get space
Hmm.. So much for Anti Matter.... NIKE MATTERS :D... Nice Nike Football ad :p
also if the universe is spherical couldn't the antimatter me on one hemisphere of the universe and matter on the other? and what if we are the antimatter and we are viewing negative as positive? and that antimatter is what we think we are? What if our spherical universe is side by side with an antimatter one? circling each other maybe? these are some other concepts I have! ;3 I would love to see some of your opinions!
We have observe a greater part of universe, its all matter. Most probably,we have observed the other sphere ( we can't say universe is sphere, there is no definite proof). Even if you right, the centre part of sphere would be empty, matter and antimatter will annihilate there. There is so such place in our observation.
give it up. you and these theoretical science guys can't even solve your neighborhood sewer problems. there's a name for it. worrying about the universe instead of your problems.
Well, there may trillions of 'what ifs' but the question is 'what is'
let's get togather and do some comic books.
Perhaps because if we understand the building blocks of the Universe, we can accomplish things that will solve all of those ills (and more) in ways we can't even imagine right now. The ability to re-order matter and traverse vast distances in short periods are hallmarks of science-fiction and among those accomplishments which make up the "holy grail" of real science, because such capabilities would remove the need for most human conflict/greed/etc.
You both underestimate the current level of technology, and it wouldn't change within months or even decades. As it stands, it costs somewhere around half a trillion USD in terms of power requirements, materials, and man-hours to produce even a few fleeting anti-particles, which is why antimatter is technically the single most valuable material in existence. Smart money would be on sustained fusion first; antimatter is a probable byproduct of that since it is found in the solar wind.
Theories still need to be proven in order to enter the realm of fact, however. Though they are a step above a hypothesis, which is colloquially referred to as an "educated guess". Theories merely have evidence and circumstances to support them - to borrow from mathematics, consider that a fully-solved equation is referred to as a "proof". Theories are not up to that level; they are merely the "most likely" explanation for phenomena according to our current level of understanding.
Gravity and anti-gravity are forces that are BOUND to matter and anti-matter. Therefore they DO travel with them. For example Earth's gravity travels with the Earth in its orbit. My (totally amateur) opinion is that matter and anti-matter separated during the "big bang" because anti-matter and the anti-gravity bound to it traveled more quickly than the matter and gravity. If that was not the case then they would have annihilated each other.
'Firmilab discovered quanta switching 3 trillion times per second from matter to antimatter.
Experiments show conversion of matter into energy through its antimatter brings about gamma rays with exact opposite momentum.
Sinusoidal spherical standing wave fronts of periodic or harmonic motion must propagate non linearly at central region producing two multiplying+/-dividing coupling resonances.
We then observe expanding ripples now dividing from its source calling this process of change 'charge.'
Go and dig it all out, if the human race does not do it, who will? We are the appointed ones. Respect creation and give glory to the creator. The splendour displayed is an invitation for the discovery. The motivative hunger is the ultimate longing of restoration and getting to know how deep His agape love is.
Hey guys and gals. Guess what.
Absolutely nothing can exist without the opposite also existing.
I call this the unwritten law of opposites. It's really not that hard to understand. If you really think about it, anything you can think of physically or spiritually, the opposite has to exist with all variations and degrees in between. Its simply commonsense. Examples:
Good/Bad, tall/short, positive/negative, visable/invisable, existence/non-existance.
You could go on forever. That includes different multiple dimensions and maybe even dimensions within dimensions.
So where do you put a limit on anything?
In some ways, it is. The graviton is still a theoretical elementary particle. Which is odd. I'd have almost expected the neutrino to be proven to exist and observed AFTER the graviton by virtue of it being a ghost particle and the graviton being the conductor of the strong force.
It's all about 0s and 1s, + and -, isn't it? Repel and attract. Evade and encumber. I loved hearing that in the very beginning after the mega-bang, that such a small percentage (1%?) formed into matter that became the Universe. In all things in life, it's the energy we put into things that shows us what matters. I love how no matter how deeply you go, how minute them particle, everything is the same. For example, look at our solar system, from a great distance, it looks like an atom. You have universes within you. Our Universe is within Universes within other Universes.
So anti matter is an exactly identical mirror image of physical matter....sounds like an intangible world....this is true very true...God is playing with our minds...there is another world out there humans can't grasp...find God, find reason... Slow minds
Mystery in mysteries, Histories in History.
Here be a riddle that comes not from man
For years or days or hours or seconds
Are but shard grains of sand.
No secret i keep
But one i cant tell
Could be the difference
'Tween Heaven and Hell.
He who has ears
Those who have eyes
Will be so astonished
At The Glory Suprised.
Turn not your back
From the Beginning of time.
Nor from the start,
Or the end of this rhyme.
What’s all this about Auntie matter? My Auntie Ada and my Auntie Margaret both matter. They make wonderful pies in square pans, and they are delicious, especially my Auntie Ada’s raspberry pi. Ada and Margaret don’t always get along and when they fight Margaret says that Auntie Ada’s opinions don’t matter.
If that’s not what you mean by 🍣Auntie matter, then never mind.
- Emily