Evolution and the Baha'i Faith

แชร์
ฝัง
  • เผยแพร่เมื่อ 10 ธ.ค. 2024

ความคิดเห็น • 14

  • @davidcrenshawphysicaltherapy
    @davidcrenshawphysicaltherapy 9 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Helpful!

  • @alexbr82
    @alexbr82 10 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Thank you Steven for this wonderful and enlighting presentation that helps to shine light on this challenging topic 🌟

  • @timelessone23
    @timelessone23 4 หลายเดือนก่อน

    ❤ I think it is important to remember, that the Bahaí Faith is an update to RELIGIOUS thinking, not specifically SCIENTIFIC thinking. Religion is about how to ACT properly based on a certain Idea. The proper way to act is described in detail by religious texts, but these are based on the knowledge available to mankind at a certain place in time. Therefore we should not confuse the two and become unnecessary dogmatic, but instead, as the Bahaí Faith also professes, bring science and religion in harmony. "Shiva Shakti atmakam Brahma" says Shrii Shrii Anandamurtiji in the Ananda Sutram. Brahma, cosmic consciousness, God, is the composite of Shiva, the knowing or observing principle and Shakti, the creative force or actional principle. In short, consciousness is composed of knowing and doing in an eternal intertwined process. The two simply can not be separated, just like the sine and cosine are inseparably related to the rotation of the circle, or the two sides of a piece of paper.
    The progressive revelation is the continuous evolution and revolution of consciousness, in individuals and collectively. So we have to take the ABSTRACT truths and principles from religious culture and combine the with the MATERIAL truths of practical science as the two progress. This is like the two hemispheres of the brain that when in good health and connected in one body allow us the be both creative and intellectual, spiritual and intuitive, and bring fantasy and reality in harmony, by knowing how they can be used and properly explored for the welfare of all.

  • @terrymcvay8606
    @terrymcvay8606 ปีที่แล้ว

    Introducing the Tree as way of understanding the varieties of evolution is extremely helpful.

  • @timelessone23
    @timelessone23 4 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Also, it is the task of the religious master to bring people to a united consciousness. That is why there has to be both the evolutionary narrative and the perception of things as they are woven into one. Therefore it may be said that in potential the human form always already existed in creation, BECAUSE creation lead obviously to how we are now. This is the top-down and the bottom-up perspective combined. The Earth as it is now has always been in the potential as it obviously lead to this Earth as it is. This is like when you come home after the holidays and that is where you are now, so this being here has always been the potential outcome, because it is as it is now. Had things gone differently, that outcome would have been your reality and had been in potentiality. Do you understand what I mean?

  • @darianlsmith6840
    @darianlsmith6840 2 หลายเดือนก่อน

    It’s understandable from the perspective of anti-entropy. Perhaps the natural evolution of those planets that are at the stage of supporting life, that life itself gravitates to a higher complexity, until it attains intelligence, then wisdom. And to higher levels of intelligence and wisdom.
    This is ‘man’, even if his form is radically different from Earth’s man. This is why Unity is the next stage of civilization.

  • @keithhopkins691
    @keithhopkins691 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Great brief presentation! Thank you for the organization of the appropriate Baha’i quotes. The unquestioned granting of intellectual legitimacy to the so called
    “scientific” perspective on any question, anymore in present time, is
    unacceptable. What is specifically a “Theory” is passed of as “gospel”, if you will, by the average public school indoctrinated bystander. If, as can easily be shown to any unbiased observer that scientific data can and is routinely
    manipulated to influence
    the beliefs of the masses then it’s authority must continuously be rigorously put to the test and only then be considered viable as a possible answer choice. No free passes for a pet “Theory” to get to be called settled science. Prove it or don’t substitute it for truth. Just saying. Everyone held to the same high standards. That, of course, under present circumstances, will not be happening in any scientific or academic settings. High priests of the scientific community are susceptible to corrupt influence like all other priesthoods throughout
    time. Point is

  • @robbyslilshadow1948
    @robbyslilshadow1948 ปีที่แล้ว

    12:13 Social Darwinism is an anathema to the Baha'i Faith.

  • @robbyslilshadow1948
    @robbyslilshadow1948 ปีที่แล้ว

    Unsurprisingly youtube scrubbed that reference in a comment of mine to Selections of the Writings of Abdu'l-Baha verse 134 and all that infers and applies healing the body with natural foods, really dissuading aiding medical malfeasance (especially medical malfeasance these past 4 years) that some non-Baha'is or people with eggregioius disrespect for Abdu'l-Baha, don't seem to understand.

  • @robbyslilshadow1948
    @robbyslilshadow1948 ปีที่แล้ว

    "The academic world, once the scene of great exploits of the mind and spirit, settled into the role of a kind of scholastic industry preoccupied with tending its machinery of dissertations, symposia, publication credits and grants." - Century of Light Prepared under the supervision of the Universal House of Justice and published in 2001, Century of Light reviews, in the context of the Bahá’í Teachings, the profound changes that the world underwent during the 20th century and their relationship with the emergence of the Bahá’í Cause during the same period.

    • @darianlsmith6840
      @darianlsmith6840 2 หลายเดือนก่อน

      Great book, Century of Light

  • @JamshidRowshan
    @JamshidRowshan 11 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Bahai Faith: creationist. Try hard but creation is Gebesis, evolution is science.

    • @darianlsmith6840
      @darianlsmith6840 2 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      Did you mean Genesis?

    • @JamshidRowshan
      @JamshidRowshan 2 หลายเดือนก่อน

      @@darianlsmith6840 yes.