Consolidated Financial Statements. Explained + Example CPA exam

แชร์
ฝัง
  • เผยแพร่เมื่อ 22 พ.ย. 2024

ความคิดเห็น • 22

  • @giryilham5892
    @giryilham5892 ปีที่แล้ว +3

    i wanna meet this guy and shake his hand. Thank you so much for this lecture sir!

  • @SubhashChandraDey-h2m
    @SubhashChandraDey-h2m 7 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    I generally avoid Farhat's YT videos since I find a lot of them a bit too rushed, but this lecture is gold.

  • @eyadmasoud641
    @eyadmasoud641 2 ปีที่แล้ว +5

    Amazing lecture . compressive example

    • @AccountingLectures
      @AccountingLectures  2 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      Thank you. Please connect with me: linktr.ee/farhatlectures

    • @antonmursid3505
      @antonmursid3505 2 ปีที่แล้ว +2

      Antonmursid🙏🙏🙏🙏🙏✌🇲🇨🇲🇨🇲🇨🇲🇨🇲🇨✌👌💝🙏

  • @dollswithballs9378
    @dollswithballs9378 2 หลายเดือนก่อน

    cleared all my doubts. amazing lecture sir

    • @AccountingLectures
      @AccountingLectures  หลายเดือนก่อน

      Most welcome. Please check my website for more. Start your free trial : farhatlectures.com/

  • @julieshah-ne4bt
    @julieshah-ne4bt 4 หลายเดือนก่อน

    In the Adjustment column can you please explain how did you ended up with figure 593,500?

  • @krishnadavda2154
    @krishnadavda2154 หลายเดือนก่อน

    RD expense amortization over 5 years why not deducted from RE at the ending elimination entry??

  • @georgecortezee6091
    @georgecortezee6091 2 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    THANK YOU
    GOOD LUCK

    • @AccountingLectures
      @AccountingLectures  2 ปีที่แล้ว

      Thank you. Please connect with me: linktr.ee/farhatlectures`

  • @mp-sv2cp
    @mp-sv2cp 2 ปีที่แล้ว +2

    I think the adjusted balance for COGS is wrong? should be $11,300,000?

    • @riyaziaf
      @riyaziaf 2 ปีที่แล้ว

      YES, U R RIGHT. IT SHOULDBE 11300K. ALSO GROSS MARGIN AFTER ADJUSTMENT SHOULD BE 7300K. THERE IS A DIFFERENCE OF 60K IN BOTH.

  • @shumirahman2382
    @shumirahman2382 9 หลายเดือนก่อน

    I am in a confused situation. I need to know the complete guide of Consolidated financial statement. You have so many lectures. I am not getting the sequence of it.

  • @jonathanwieler8863
    @jonathanwieler8863 2 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Thank you!

    • @AccountingLectures
      @AccountingLectures  2 ปีที่แล้ว

      Most welcome. Please connect with me: linktr.ee/farhatlectures

  • @sonerguney3225
    @sonerguney3225 2 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Super

    • @AccountingLectures
      @AccountingLectures  2 ปีที่แล้ว

      Super. Please connect with me: linktr.ee/farhatlectures

  • @Lotus0305
    @Lotus0305 ปีที่แล้ว

    Shouldn’t R&as be expensed (recorded in P&L instead of an asset)?

    • @Lotus0305
      @Lotus0305 ปีที่แล้ว

      I mean… Shouldn’t *R&D* be expensed (recorded in P&L instead of Assets)?

    • @SubhashChandraDey-h2m
      @SubhashChandraDey-h2m 7 หลายเดือนก่อน

      @@Lotus0305 Yes you are correct. However, the R&D expense mentioned in this problem is not the same as the concept you are mentioning. Here, the acquirer is willing to pay 150K excess over the Book Value of the net assets of the acquiree because of some on going R&D in the company which is valuable. In the acquiree's books the R&D expense, whatever the amount, is already a part of its expenses on the Income Statement. Finding some hidden worth in that R&D, the acquiror is now willing to pay 150K over and above the book value of the acquiree's firm to get a hold of it.

    • @SubhashChandraDey-h2m
      @SubhashChandraDey-h2m 7 หลายเดือนก่อน

      Thus this R&D is a part of the FMV-BV component and will only reflect as an amortizable item on the consolidated balance sheet. The other place this 150k will be embedded is in the Investment account on the parent's standalone books. This has nothing to do with the actual R&D expense incurred buy the subsidiary.