A Safety First Approach to Retirement Planning and the Problems with the 4% Rule with Dr. Wade Pfau

แชร์
ฝัง
  • เผยแพร่เมื่อ 2 ธ.ค. 2024
  • The 4% rule has become one of the cornerstones of retirement planning. And in many ways that makes sense because investors who have spent 4% of their portfolio annually have historically had a very high chance of making their money last. But with expected returns on both stocks and bonds at historical lows, the 4% rule may not work as well in the future as it has in the past.
    This week, we explore this concept and look at a different approach to retirement planning with Dr. Wade Pfau, who is a Professor of Retirement Income at the American College and a principal at McLean Asset Management.
    We cover a variety of topics including the safety first approach to retirement, the impact of expected returns on retirement planning and the role that home equity should play in a retirement plan.
    We hope you enjoy the discussion.
    MORE ABOUT WADE
    Retirement Researcher - by Wade Pfau, Ph.D. CFA & McLean Asset Management
    retirementrese...
    FOLLOW WADE ON TWITTER
    Wade Pfau (@WadePfau) / Twitter
    SEE LATEST EPISODES
    www.validea.co...
    FIND OUT MORE ABOUT VALIDEA
    www.validea.com
    FOLLOW OUR BLOG
    blog.validea.com
    FIND OUT MORE ABOUT VALIDEA CAPITAL
    www.valideacap...
    FOLLOW JACK
    Twitter: / practicalquant
    LinkedIn: / jack-forehand-8015094
    FOLLOW JUSTIN
    Twitter: / jjcarbonneau
    LinkedIn: / jcarbonneau

ความคิดเห็น • 15

  • @davidfolts5893
    @davidfolts5893 ปีที่แล้ว +3

    Wade Pfau reminds me of Jack Bogle, both Princeton graduates and wicked smart.

  • @mrb552
    @mrb552 2 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Excellent interview and great questions! 👍

  • @johngill2853
    @johngill2853 ปีที่แล้ว +2

    If you really listen to this guy you can learn a lot.
    4% is still viable (he estimates 70% of the time), you just have to be flexible if the worst shows up.

    • @ExcessReturns
      @ExcessReturns  ปีที่แล้ว +1

      Thanks John, appreciate you watching and commenting. Wade has many good/important insights in this interview.

  • @garya2223
    @garya2223 2 ปีที่แล้ว

    Now we need a video about the "tax efficiency" of the different types of income - SPIA/DIA, FIA, MYGA, WL, IUL, etc. These types of income will affect taxation of SS differently.

  • @hardcor1313
    @hardcor1313 2 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Mixing it up in retirement for myself has been going like this, | 2019 (2.364%) | 2020 (3.171%) | 2021 (2.75%)| 2022 (2.46%) |. I'm comfortable with this for now, but it only meets my expenses. So far my portfolio balance continues to go up with this type of risk management approach. 4% is too high for me even though it would be nice to have more income. Need to rebalance my portfolio and make those decisions we all struggle with in retirement.

  • @jamesmorris913
    @jamesmorris913 2 ปีที่แล้ว

    ...very elderly upon initially funding the annuity and/or, opened it with an ENORMOUS initial sum, in relation to your anticipated spending needs/life expectancy, to protect against inflation.

  • @johnnorris4509
    @johnnorris4509 3 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Very nice and bright man you are Wade . Are you still sure 2.8% will be a good withdrawal from savings

    • @johngill2853
      @johngill2853 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      Nobody is sure. They make predictions
      If they were sure of market performance they would be the richest person in the world

  • @jamesmorris913
    @jamesmorris913 2 ปีที่แล้ว +2

    This video was from nearly a year ago, when FEW people (maybe not even Dr. Pfau) could not have imagined the highest inflation-rate, in 40+ years; that we are currently experiencing! This is my big hesitation about ANNUTIES. To my knowledge..there is no such thing, as an inflation-protected annuity..so in my estimation, an annuity would NOT be "safe" for a retiree, unless you were VERY elderly. What am I missing, here?

    • @ExcessReturns
      @ExcessReturns  2 ปีที่แล้ว

      Thank you for watching and commenting James. You are correct, inflation is very problematic for most annuities. I did a quick Google search, and it looks like there are inflation protected annuities, at least according to this article. Although it looks like they come with a pretty steep cost in order to get that inflation protection.
      www.annuity.org/annuities/types/inflation-adjusted/

    • @tricord2939
      @tricord2939 2 ปีที่แล้ว

      What is the alternative? Stock market and hope.

    • @jonathanratliff4780
      @jonathanratliff4780 ปีที่แล้ว

      Indeed from a Mutual life insurer, most have most have dividend sharing income plans. So annuitant has a contractually guaranteed base income, and then annual dividends added to base that grows income to aid in inflation adjustment. Dividends are not guaranteed, but the cream of the crop Mutual insurers have declared generous dividends every single year even in worst of times for generations of time. Once dividends are declared they cannot be reversed and are then guaranteed for life

    • @johngill2853
      @johngill2853 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      You buy the annuity with a part of your money and invest the rest in a high percentage of stocks
      Also you can buy a COLA adjusted SPIA, while it doesn't increase by the stated inflation rate not everyone feels inflation the same way. For instance somebody who owns their own home won't feel inflation like a renter. Inflation rates are average and not everybody is average

    • @johngill2853
      @johngill2853 ปีที่แล้ว

      ​@@tricord2939 Hope no, calculated risk yes. That is investing . You always have the choice to stick your money in the bank or under your mattress.