I hope this gets properly investigated as it should. Atti fought incredibly and it was the best fight I’ve probably ever seen from 2 cruiser-weight. a draw was sus but to then overturn it and call Atti champion was a ridiculous decision and shows how much of a farce WBC, Muay Thai are becoming no matter what rule set that you use the outcome should not have been this. I hope you watch the five rounds again and realise what a huge mistake you have made and the impact this has on the real champions.
Definitely didn't win round 2, landed almost nothing clean compared to every shot Atti was throwing caused a grimace. Could see a draw, but it wasn't a Scott Win.
Great fight from two warriors but Scott took that fight for me. Walked Atti down for most of the fight, buckled the leg twice with low kicks, took the back in the fifth. Atti had a good mix with his weapons and great low kicks. Don't understand how Scott didn't go home with that belt, but that is no disrepect to Atti who fought excellently.
One of the best fights I've seen
Atti is made of steel. They both are.
Scott should of taken this belt back home again. Id like to see a rematch.
Scott is a machine man..WBC needs to investigate this.
This guy on the white trunks was one hell of a good fighter with legs kicks and round mid kick
I hope this gets properly investigated as it should. Atti fought incredibly and it was the best fight I’ve probably ever seen from 2 cruiser-weight. a draw was sus but to then overturn it and call Atti champion was a ridiculous decision and shows how much of a farce WBC, Muay Thai are becoming no matter what rule set that you use the outcome should not have been this. I hope you watch the five rounds again and realise what a huge mistake you have made and the impact this has on the real champions.
1-2-5 Atti.
How come the judge changed his card? Never seen something like that before
Agree sooo weird
No judge changed his card the decision was passed to the mc incorrectly by the wbc supervisor. It also states that on the wbc website
@@wainey22completely wrong decision either way
@@Jakehauleyin your opinion maybe
Changing decision last minute very unprofessional from judges , don’t get how that’s acceptable
Must admit its strange nd controversial. And should not happen at this level. I feel the 1st decision was close to being the right one.
Scott won Rounds 2 3 & 5, Belt should of stayed with Scott.
Great Fight, Poor Decision from the Judges.
Definitely didn't win round 2, landed almost nothing clean compared to every shot Atti was throwing caused a grimace. Could see a draw, but it wasn't a Scott Win.
GREAT FIGHT!
WBC loosing my respect these days, belt should have stayed with Scott
Why? It was a fair decision
8:56 yo, people are chanting "low kick" 🤣🤣😂
There chanting “Scotty Scotty” bro
@@miniman-ss2ld you're right, but i swear i heard "low kick" 1st time round 🤣
WBC score low kicks
No hate Scott won that fair belt should of stayed even atti was confused when belt given to him
Amazing Rumble both winners IMO 🙏🏽
They BOTH should be given the belt. Then face-off in 30 days for the incontestable winner. Whatever the case...Atti is my favorite. 🏆
Great fight from two warriors but Scott took that fight for me. Walked Atti down for most of the fight, buckled the leg twice with low kicks, took the back in the fifth. Atti had a good mix with his weapons and great low kicks. Don't understand how Scott didn't go home with that belt, but that is no disrepect to Atti who fought excellently.
Refs no any officials needs banning for life