Please don't push any conspiracy theory about the US having nuclear=powered aircraft (just like lots of people these believe we never went to the moon, or its opposite, that the US received space alien technology on the moon or elsewhere!). It's nonsense. As to the prospect of a nuclear-powered aircraft, I don't think it'll happen any time soon. First, there are huge technical challenges still--developing a small enough nuclear reactor with sufficient power, radiation shield issues, etc. In addition, what's the acceptability of a radioactive spill if an accident or shootdown (during war) occurs? ALL PLANES CRASH, no exception, if there are more than a handful copies of the plane. (Sometimes when there's only 1 plane, it still crashes--XB70, for instance). With a nuclear-powered aircraft, that could be a major disaster, not just a "normal" explosion. Only a reckless country like Russia would keep trying--Putin has boasted of not just a nuke-powered aircraft, but actually nuke-powered CRUISE MISSILES and torpedoes.
需要等到核聚變技術成熟才有可能
兵老師有點想當然了，航母出現機械故障或失去了動力可以漂在海面上慢慢修，但是飛行器就不一樣了。飛行器暫時失去動力還好說，可以受控降落。但如果是控制系統出問題，或者直接控制面失效，那可就真變成巡航導彈了 😂
如果成功了可能出现高達了
話說我記得俄羅斯不是有和巡航導彈，試航的時候在北約上空連續飛了一週。
我現在覺得核能無人機比較有可能實現， 直接停在空中可以幾個月的時間不動
這頻道經常用到的背景音樂是甚麼名字？
核動力飛機 （ 嚴格講是核動力轟炸機 ） ，主打能長時間滯空，如果不是機組人員的忍受能力有限，飛機機械的運轉需要休息檢修，核動力等於是擁有無限制航程，能提供不間斷的核威脅能力，但能攜帶核彈頭的洲際彈道導彈製造出來後，這點彈道導彈就自然而然的取代了，而且還沒有核動力飛機的缺點呢
感覺核動力宇航火箭更吸引人 更不會被排斥 可以輕鬆飛出太陽系外
大載重飛機上有大量消耗件，會在飛行過程中磨損，即使有了核動力，可能航程上會增加十倍二十倍，但是不會具有在空中滯留數月的能力……
天上你去哪裏生大量的水來產生蒸氣轉為電力與推進力
還有天上沒水，你怎麽讓核反應器降溫，沒水降溫你的反應器就爆炸了啊
沒有大量的水降溫，你核反應器就爆炸掉了
核动力飞行器只能做成类似高达里边的太空战舰，在大气层内飘在海面，起飞就直接上太空。何况那么强的动力储备和续航时间，在大气圈飞行实在是浪费。也许马斯克的星舰有一天能做到。
單靠核能產熱實現變循環發動機，推動飛行器從海平面升到太空有些不太現實。因為傳統渦輪核心機在燃燒產熱的同時，也大大增加了噴射尾氣的質量，從而使飛行器獲得巨大衝量。但是純熱機很難做到這一點，因為進氣質量恆等於排氣質量。即使增大進氣量，同時提高排氣流量，能對飛行器提供的衝量也比不上傳統渦輪核心機。
❤❤❤
是要做鋼彈還是機動戰艦還是大型飛碟
核聚變技術比較適用
除非能夠由核反應埋直接發電，否則根本無可能安裝在飛機上
核動力無人機就等同無人機核武，一有意外變成全球大戰，沒可能發展的
核能動力空中基地比較理想
也可以說一下核動力火箭🚀😂
核動力飛機可能要做到像漫威那樣了😂😂😂
核動力無人機好説。
發展核能飛機的人都是瘋的！
小型反應堆多大多重，產生的推力又是多少？先造台核能車每小時跑五六百公里再說。
如果有一天造出來后，也應給人禁止，這個核能飛機，等於核彈，不可能隨意起飛。
其實核航母或核潛艇給人打爆，導致核洩漏，也造成大量污染，聯合國也應限制其製造的。
飛機吃核但機師不吃核，有空中麥當奴嗎？😅
頭香~
核動力飛機飛到敵國其實已經可以當成動用核武了
打下來就有核污染
呵呵 如果俄羅斯發明出來實現
飛到美國人口密集區
你是打不打下來呢 打下來不算一顆小型核彈嗎
怎麼不說飛機失事？在俄羅斯莫斯科墜毀?
😊😊😊
現在要搞核動飛機...戰鬥妖精雪風OVA出場的女妖？
直接飞去火星吃个海底捞才回来😂😂
Please don't push any conspiracy theory about the US having nuclear=powered aircraft (just like lots of people these believe we never went to the moon, or its opposite, that the US received space alien technology on the moon or elsewhere!). It's nonsense.
As to the prospect of a nuclear-powered aircraft, I don't think it'll happen any time soon. First, there are huge technical challenges still--developing a small enough nuclear reactor with sufficient power, radiation shield issues, etc. In addition, what's the acceptability of a radioactive spill if an accident or shootdown (during war) occurs? ALL PLANES CRASH, no exception, if there are more than a handful copies of the plane. (Sometimes when there's only 1 plane, it still crashes--XB70, for instance). With a nuclear-powered aircraft, that could be a major disaster, not just a "normal" explosion.
Only a reckless country like Russia would keep trying--Putin has boasted of not just a nuke-powered aircraft, but actually nuke-powered CRUISE MISSILES and torpedoes.