Swami Vivekananda’s Philosophical Defense of Spiritual Experience · Swami Medhananda

แชร์
ฝัง
  • เผยแพร่เมื่อ 12 พ.ย. 2024

ความคิดเห็น • 15

  • @satyanarayanaalleboina1805
    @satyanarayanaalleboina1805 ปีที่แล้ว

    Pranam Swami Medhananda! Om Namah Shivay!

  • @swamivedantanandapuri1322
    @swamivedantanandapuri1322 ปีที่แล้ว

    Wonderful. Many thanks.
    Pranaam🙏🙏🙏🙏🙏🙏🙏🙏🙏🙏🙏🙏🙏🙏🙏🙏🙏🙏🙏🙏🙏

  • @I.love.Jagdamba_Shiva_Hari.
    @I.love.Jagdamba_Shiva_Hari. ปีที่แล้ว +11

    This amazing Sadhu should be given few more lecturing opportunities every month. If you agree please like my comment..लाइक ठोको আমার মন্তব্য মত

  • @meetalisengupta7886
    @meetalisengupta7886 ปีที่แล้ว

    Pronam Thakur Pronam Maa Pronam Swamiji Pronam Maharaj

  • @mokshajetley9244
    @mokshajetley9244 ปีที่แล้ว

    Pranaam Swami Medhananda ji. Stay blessed

  • @meetalisengupta7886
    @meetalisengupta7886 ปีที่แล้ว

    Today's class was awesome. No words from my end to explain how good it was. Thankyou Swamiji. Pronam neben.

  • @bhattacharya6774
    @bhattacharya6774 ปีที่แล้ว

    Pranam Maharaj 🙏 🙏

  • @mokshajetley9244
    @mokshajetley9244 ปีที่แล้ว

    Jai Swami Vivekananda

  • @mkh2799
    @mkh2799 ปีที่แล้ว

    🙏

  • @alecmisra4964
    @alecmisra4964 ปีที่แล้ว

    A simple example of the same kind of reasoning you use here is to ask how you verify the existence of dreams?
    You follow a certain procedure (ie going to sleep) and at some point the experience of the dreaming state occurs.
    With mystical experience, superconsciousness etc, the procedure is trickier but the principle is still valid and has been validated many times of course. But still they do not accept accumulated testimony (cp nde's also) yet claim to be being scientific.

  • @kenjones7719
    @kenjones7719 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Vedanta teacher James Swartz, who also goes by the name Ramji, recently said that he doesn't believe Vivekananda was enlightened, and further, that he doesn't think Ramakrishna was taught Vedanta properly, in part because he went into samadhi at will, whereas Swartz apparently finds that as proof that he couldn't have been enlightened! Those claims likely stem from Swartz's faith in Shankaracharya's interpretation of scripture. It's these kinds of controversies that leave seekers with a bad taste and to go looking elsewhere, such as neo-Advaita.

    • @bratatimukherjee6400
      @bratatimukherjee6400 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      Sri Ramkrishna dev was enlightened. He used to go in Samadhi and come back to this world for the benefit of beings as he has understood that Brahman has become this universe. He had infinite compassion for the suffering of the beings!Various people claim to know vedanta but practically they themselves have not achieved required purification of the mind and the body.their understanding is therefore incomplete!

    • @unified2002
      @unified2002 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      That's the view of all most people belong to Shankara school... They look at Vivekanda in the lines of Shankara.. Swami Medhananda clears this confusion in his book...

    • @kenjones7719
      @kenjones7719 ปีที่แล้ว

      @@unified2002 I very much look forward to reading his book as I have watched his talks on TH-cam.

    • @kenjones7719
      @kenjones7719 ปีที่แล้ว

      @@bratatimukherjee6400 Thank you for those words. Can you tell me the meaning of the hand posture Ramakrishna made when he went into samadhi, with the two middle fingers touching the palm? I believe I know, but need to have an answer from others.